What is a gender neutral equivalent for the following phrase?Is there a politer way of saying 'don't get you panties in a bunch'?Gender-neutral equivalent for “Take it like a man”Is “Jew” gender-neutral?Looking for a gender neutral equivalent for “dairyman”Is “past master” a gender neutral phrase?What is gender neutral for fraternity/sorority?Gender-neutral mermaidWhat is the true gender-neutral equivalent of “man”?Is there a gender neutral equivalent of “manspreading”?Gender-neutral “Jane Doe” / “John Doe”Gender-neutral equivalent of “to a man”

In "Avatar: The Last Airbender" can a metalbender bloodbend if there is metal in our blood?

Text on old-fashioned differential geometry

In the comics, have any of the Robins called their costume "target attraction" for villains?

How can I turn on Adventure Sync?

What is this game with a red cricket pushing a ball?

How many records can an Apex Batch process

What could possibly power an Alcubierre drive?

A curious 5x5 square

Incorrect mmap behavior when assembly files included in the project

What is "demographic engineering" and how does it differ from ethnic cleansing?

What is a gender neutral equivalent for the following phrase?

Can you upgrade armour from breastplate to halfplate?

What does すきすき mean here?

3-prong to 4-prong conversion - EXTRA MISLABELLED WIRES - Dryer cable upgrade and installation

What does this text mean with capitalized letters?

Novel with a mix of real world and gods

How to respond to "Why didn't you do a postdoc after your PhD?"

What‘s wrong with my proof of the Law of Total Variance?

What is the "Applicable country" field on the Icelandair check-in form?

Code Golf Measurer © 2019

Standard cumulative distribution function with optimization model variable

Who can change WIP limit in DoW when urgent work emerges?

Fermat's polygonal number theorem

A fast aquatic predator with multiple eyes and pupils. Would these eyes be possible?



What is a gender neutral equivalent for the following phrase?


Is there a politer way of saying 'don't get you panties in a bunch'?Gender-neutral equivalent for “Take it like a man”Is “Jew” gender-neutral?Looking for a gender neutral equivalent for “dairyman”Is “past master” a gender neutral phrase?What is gender neutral for fraternity/sorority?Gender-neutral mermaidWhat is the true gender-neutral equivalent of “man”?Is there a gender neutral equivalent of “manspreading”?Gender-neutral “Jane Doe” / “John Doe”Gender-neutral equivalent of “to a man”






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;









1

















Sometimes I see the phrase




I'm not going to get my panties in a bunch [if such-and-so...]




which is an idiom for




I'm not going to get upset [if such-and-so...]




There are variants involving knickers, twisting, knot, etc.



Suppose someone wants to use an expression with a similarly light tone, but without the gender focus --given that panties and knickers are by definition women's garments. What would be a functionally equivalent expression without the single gender focus?



(Note, Is there a politer way of saying 'don't get you panties in a bunch'? includes the panties in a bunch but the meaning there is different.)




Update:



Many of you are misreading my question. I am not asking for an equivalent to "Don't get your panties in a bunch." I am asking for an equivalent to "I'm not going to get my panties in a bunch" -- which is completely different.










share|improve this question




























  • flip your biscuits

    – samgak
    2 hours ago











  • @samgak - I think you've got the question backwards -- please see the update.

    – aparente001
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    "I'm not gonna flip a biscuit"?

    – samgak
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    The dictionary definition of the idiom "knickers in a twist" doesn't mention gender. I'm sure I've heard both that and "knickers in a knot" applied to both women and men here in Australia.

    – nnnnnn
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    @aparente001 I'm addressing the title of your question. If that's not what you want to ask, then you need to rephrase it.

    – Jason Bassford
    2 hours ago

















1

















Sometimes I see the phrase




I'm not going to get my panties in a bunch [if such-and-so...]




which is an idiom for




I'm not going to get upset [if such-and-so...]




There are variants involving knickers, twisting, knot, etc.



Suppose someone wants to use an expression with a similarly light tone, but without the gender focus --given that panties and knickers are by definition women's garments. What would be a functionally equivalent expression without the single gender focus?



(Note, Is there a politer way of saying 'don't get you panties in a bunch'? includes the panties in a bunch but the meaning there is different.)




Update:



Many of you are misreading my question. I am not asking for an equivalent to "Don't get your panties in a bunch." I am asking for an equivalent to "I'm not going to get my panties in a bunch" -- which is completely different.










share|improve this question




























  • flip your biscuits

    – samgak
    2 hours ago











  • @samgak - I think you've got the question backwards -- please see the update.

    – aparente001
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    "I'm not gonna flip a biscuit"?

    – samgak
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    The dictionary definition of the idiom "knickers in a twist" doesn't mention gender. I'm sure I've heard both that and "knickers in a knot" applied to both women and men here in Australia.

    – nnnnnn
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    @aparente001 I'm addressing the title of your question. If that's not what you want to ask, then you need to rephrase it.

    – Jason Bassford
    2 hours ago













1












1








1








Sometimes I see the phrase




I'm not going to get my panties in a bunch [if such-and-so...]




which is an idiom for




I'm not going to get upset [if such-and-so...]




There are variants involving knickers, twisting, knot, etc.



Suppose someone wants to use an expression with a similarly light tone, but without the gender focus --given that panties and knickers are by definition women's garments. What would be a functionally equivalent expression without the single gender focus?



(Note, Is there a politer way of saying 'don't get you panties in a bunch'? includes the panties in a bunch but the meaning there is different.)




Update:



Many of you are misreading my question. I am not asking for an equivalent to "Don't get your panties in a bunch." I am asking for an equivalent to "I'm not going to get my panties in a bunch" -- which is completely different.










share|improve this question
















Sometimes I see the phrase




I'm not going to get my panties in a bunch [if such-and-so...]




which is an idiom for




I'm not going to get upset [if such-and-so...]




There are variants involving knickers, twisting, knot, etc.



Suppose someone wants to use an expression with a similarly light tone, but without the gender focus --given that panties and knickers are by definition women's garments. What would be a functionally equivalent expression without the single gender focus?



(Note, Is there a politer way of saying 'don't get you panties in a bunch'? includes the panties in a bunch but the meaning there is different.)




Update:



Many of you are misreading my question. I am not asking for an equivalent to "Don't get your panties in a bunch." I am asking for an equivalent to "I'm not going to get my panties in a bunch" -- which is completely different.







phrase-requests idiom-requests expression-requests gender-neutral






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question



share|improve this question








edited 2 hours ago







aparente001

















asked 8 hours ago









aparente001aparente001

16.2k5 gold badges37 silver badges78 bronze badges




16.2k5 gold badges37 silver badges78 bronze badges















  • flip your biscuits

    – samgak
    2 hours ago











  • @samgak - I think you've got the question backwards -- please see the update.

    – aparente001
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    "I'm not gonna flip a biscuit"?

    – samgak
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    The dictionary definition of the idiom "knickers in a twist" doesn't mention gender. I'm sure I've heard both that and "knickers in a knot" applied to both women and men here in Australia.

    – nnnnnn
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    @aparente001 I'm addressing the title of your question. If that's not what you want to ask, then you need to rephrase it.

    – Jason Bassford
    2 hours ago

















  • flip your biscuits

    – samgak
    2 hours ago











  • @samgak - I think you've got the question backwards -- please see the update.

    – aparente001
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    "I'm not gonna flip a biscuit"?

    – samgak
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    The dictionary definition of the idiom "knickers in a twist" doesn't mention gender. I'm sure I've heard both that and "knickers in a knot" applied to both women and men here in Australia.

    – nnnnnn
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    @aparente001 I'm addressing the title of your question. If that's not what you want to ask, then you need to rephrase it.

    – Jason Bassford
    2 hours ago
















flip your biscuits

– samgak
2 hours ago





flip your biscuits

– samgak
2 hours ago













@samgak - I think you've got the question backwards -- please see the update.

– aparente001
2 hours ago





@samgak - I think you've got the question backwards -- please see the update.

– aparente001
2 hours ago




1




1





"I'm not gonna flip a biscuit"?

– samgak
2 hours ago





"I'm not gonna flip a biscuit"?

– samgak
2 hours ago




1




1





The dictionary definition of the idiom "knickers in a twist" doesn't mention gender. I'm sure I've heard both that and "knickers in a knot" applied to both women and men here in Australia.

– nnnnnn
2 hours ago





The dictionary definition of the idiom "knickers in a twist" doesn't mention gender. I'm sure I've heard both that and "knickers in a knot" applied to both women and men here in Australia.

– nnnnnn
2 hours ago




1




1





@aparente001 I'm addressing the title of your question. If that's not what you want to ask, then you need to rephrase it.

– Jason Bassford
2 hours ago





@aparente001 I'm addressing the title of your question. If that's not what you want to ask, then you need to rephrase it.

– Jason Bassford
2 hours ago










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















3


















There's nothing wrong with "... get your knickers in a twist". It's the idiomatic expression, and it can be applied to anybody regardless of gender or underwear choice. They are, after all, only metaphorical knickers, not literal ones.



Replacing the nouns in that expression will just make it seem as if you don't know the idiomatic form. Whatever gender-neutral boxes it might tick, it would fail to be good English.






share|improve this answer


























  • Whether there's anything wrong with an expression is a matter of opinion. I am most familiar with US English, and in my opinion (I realize some may disagree), the panties phrase is disrespectful to women. I am guessing I'd have a similar reaction to the knickers version if I were really fluent in UK English, for the same reason, because I checked a dictionary and it said knickers are worn by women. At any rate, thanks for trying to help, but this doesn't answer the question. I didn't ask whether the panties and knickers expressions are problematic. I'd suggest a comment instead.

    – aparente001
    7 hours ago







  • 2





    UK here. It's an entirely idiomatic expression, which means that it's basically lost all meaning. Knickers is certainly the most common form, and equally applicable to both sexes.

    – Andrew Leach
    7 hours ago











  • @aparente001 If you want to avoid disrespect, I’d suggest not using any variant of the saying. It’s intentionally disrespectful to the addressee, so you won’t get away from that no matter what item of clothing you substitute. Like Andrew and Rosie, I don’t perceive any gender bias in the phrase, despite the garment being primarily feminine, but it is disrespectful. You might use “Keep your hair on”, but that has similar, though milder, notes of disrespect. Essentially, I’d say the notion itself is hard to express without disrespect.

    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    4 hours ago











  • I agree with @Janud Bahs Jacquet - it's always going to be a rude phrase, whatever item of clothing you attempt to substitute. I'd be offended if someone said it to me, and I'd be incensed if they used the 'panties in a bunch' version, which I would also perceive as sexist.

    – Jelila
    4 hours ago











  • @AndrewLeach - I didn't ask whether the knickers expression is problematic. I asked for an alternative that could be used by someone who does not want to use an idiom that includes the word "knickers."

    – aparente001
    2 hours ago



















3


















Is this affected by region? I believe I've heard "undies in a bunch" most recently, which has the advantage of carrying the rhythm of the original.






share|improve this answer









New contributor



Scample is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • It works for me (US English).... Hopefully it works in UK English too.

    – aparente001
    7 hours ago






  • 1





    The only version with which I, as a British English speaker, am familiar, is "knickers in a twist". All the rest of them sound like more or less clumsy variations on that to me.

    – BoldBen
    6 hours ago












  • @BoldBen - It doesn't need to be an established expression, as long as people can understand it. Consider the undulation example, for instance.

    – aparente001
    2 hours ago


















3


















Try this:




I'm not going to get all bent out of shape.




No gender implied at all, and the meaning is the same (to get upset to distraction about something).




  1. (of a person) Upset or angry.
    Don't get all bent out of shape—I'm sure she didn't mean to insult you.

    You should apologize to Phil before he gets bent out of shape.

    TFD Online






share|improve this answer




























  • Robusto, you've got the question backwards (along with almost everybody else who's participated on this page). Please see the question update.

    – aparente001
    2 hours ago











  • I see your update but I disagree that I got it wrong. What I and others have replied is true of any pronoun. But note that I did say "I'm not going to get all bent out of shape." You're trying to make a distinction without a difference.

    – Robusto
    2 hours ago












  • Ah, I just read your answer more carefully. I read your earlier answer, prior to your edit, stepped away, and came back and wrote the comment now, without noticing that you had added to your answer. Yes, by jove, I think you've hit on something! This expression works, and it works equally well, in the "you" version and in the "I" version. Thank you.

    – aparente001
    2 hours ago



















2


















Out of sorts, don't get upset



You could say 'don't get upset', or 'there's no need to get out of sorts about it'.



Note that 'knickers in a twist' is a fairly rude phrase. Saying it directly to someone is always going to be really 'fanning the flames' - not calming the situation. You can't convert a rude phrase like this into something polite without changing its very nature.



Non-rude alternatives are going to need to include genuine care for the person and be calming or assisting the situation.



You may however, harmlessly use the phrase to talk about someone out of their earshot, like 'my boss really got his knickers in a twist about my lateness'. But if he overheard you saying it - that would be baaaad! Sooo. Bad.



Note that in UK English we use the expression for men or women, still with 'knickers'.



Why? Well it's even more funny!



Postscript:



'knickers in a twist' is a way of saying 'I perceive that something, under the surface, unseen, may be troubling you'. You need therapist-level sensitivity, to be able to pull off saying that to somebody without enraging them.






share|improve this answer




























  • (Please see clarifying update in question.) What do you think about Scample's proposal of the undies?

    – aparente001
    2 hours ago











  • "Get upset" does work -- but it's a bit flavorless. I think "bent out of shape" sounds more like an expression or idiom. // Thanks for explaining the funny aspect in the UK of men referring to the knickers.

    – aparente001
    1 hour ago



















0


















There are some proposals written by a Jacob Weeks on Quora:




Growing up I read a lot of Andy Griffiths books, and my answer is
heavily influenced by that fact. My chosen phrases are:



  • Don't get your knickers in a knot

  • Don't get your trousers in a twist

Here are some that I have concocted:



  • Don't get your slacks in a swivel


  • Don't get your jeans in a jerk


I also came up with this one, but I don't think it has quite the same
ring to it:



  • Don't get your underwear into an undulation



The first two are too gender-suggestive; the jeans won't work because jerk isn't a gracious word; slacks might work but I think the undulation is funnier, so that's my current best candidate.






share|improve this answer



































    0


















    I have always liked "I won't get my undies in a bundle". Though, technically, undies usually refer to woman/girl underwear, it doesn't necessarily always refer to female underwear.






    share|improve this answer









    New contributor



    Wordsmyth is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





















    • Oh shoot. I just checked a dictionary and saw that you're right, undies are apparently primarily for girls and women. I was thinking this was going to work when @Scample proposed it. Oh well, back to the drawing board.

      – aparente001
      2 hours ago












    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );














    draft saved

    draft discarded
















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f514842%2fwhat-is-a-gender-neutral-equivalent-for-the-following-phrase%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown


























    6 Answers
    6






    active

    oldest

    votes








    6 Answers
    6






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3


















    There's nothing wrong with "... get your knickers in a twist". It's the idiomatic expression, and it can be applied to anybody regardless of gender or underwear choice. They are, after all, only metaphorical knickers, not literal ones.



    Replacing the nouns in that expression will just make it seem as if you don't know the idiomatic form. Whatever gender-neutral boxes it might tick, it would fail to be good English.






    share|improve this answer


























    • Whether there's anything wrong with an expression is a matter of opinion. I am most familiar with US English, and in my opinion (I realize some may disagree), the panties phrase is disrespectful to women. I am guessing I'd have a similar reaction to the knickers version if I were really fluent in UK English, for the same reason, because I checked a dictionary and it said knickers are worn by women. At any rate, thanks for trying to help, but this doesn't answer the question. I didn't ask whether the panties and knickers expressions are problematic. I'd suggest a comment instead.

      – aparente001
      7 hours ago







    • 2





      UK here. It's an entirely idiomatic expression, which means that it's basically lost all meaning. Knickers is certainly the most common form, and equally applicable to both sexes.

      – Andrew Leach
      7 hours ago











    • @aparente001 If you want to avoid disrespect, I’d suggest not using any variant of the saying. It’s intentionally disrespectful to the addressee, so you won’t get away from that no matter what item of clothing you substitute. Like Andrew and Rosie, I don’t perceive any gender bias in the phrase, despite the garment being primarily feminine, but it is disrespectful. You might use “Keep your hair on”, but that has similar, though milder, notes of disrespect. Essentially, I’d say the notion itself is hard to express without disrespect.

      – Janus Bahs Jacquet
      4 hours ago











    • I agree with @Janud Bahs Jacquet - it's always going to be a rude phrase, whatever item of clothing you attempt to substitute. I'd be offended if someone said it to me, and I'd be incensed if they used the 'panties in a bunch' version, which I would also perceive as sexist.

      – Jelila
      4 hours ago











    • @AndrewLeach - I didn't ask whether the knickers expression is problematic. I asked for an alternative that could be used by someone who does not want to use an idiom that includes the word "knickers."

      – aparente001
      2 hours ago
















    3


















    There's nothing wrong with "... get your knickers in a twist". It's the idiomatic expression, and it can be applied to anybody regardless of gender or underwear choice. They are, after all, only metaphorical knickers, not literal ones.



    Replacing the nouns in that expression will just make it seem as if you don't know the idiomatic form. Whatever gender-neutral boxes it might tick, it would fail to be good English.






    share|improve this answer


























    • Whether there's anything wrong with an expression is a matter of opinion. I am most familiar with US English, and in my opinion (I realize some may disagree), the panties phrase is disrespectful to women. I am guessing I'd have a similar reaction to the knickers version if I were really fluent in UK English, for the same reason, because I checked a dictionary and it said knickers are worn by women. At any rate, thanks for trying to help, but this doesn't answer the question. I didn't ask whether the panties and knickers expressions are problematic. I'd suggest a comment instead.

      – aparente001
      7 hours ago







    • 2





      UK here. It's an entirely idiomatic expression, which means that it's basically lost all meaning. Knickers is certainly the most common form, and equally applicable to both sexes.

      – Andrew Leach
      7 hours ago











    • @aparente001 If you want to avoid disrespect, I’d suggest not using any variant of the saying. It’s intentionally disrespectful to the addressee, so you won’t get away from that no matter what item of clothing you substitute. Like Andrew and Rosie, I don’t perceive any gender bias in the phrase, despite the garment being primarily feminine, but it is disrespectful. You might use “Keep your hair on”, but that has similar, though milder, notes of disrespect. Essentially, I’d say the notion itself is hard to express without disrespect.

      – Janus Bahs Jacquet
      4 hours ago











    • I agree with @Janud Bahs Jacquet - it's always going to be a rude phrase, whatever item of clothing you attempt to substitute. I'd be offended if someone said it to me, and I'd be incensed if they used the 'panties in a bunch' version, which I would also perceive as sexist.

      – Jelila
      4 hours ago











    • @AndrewLeach - I didn't ask whether the knickers expression is problematic. I asked for an alternative that could be used by someone who does not want to use an idiom that includes the word "knickers."

      – aparente001
      2 hours ago














    3














    3










    3









    There's nothing wrong with "... get your knickers in a twist". It's the idiomatic expression, and it can be applied to anybody regardless of gender or underwear choice. They are, after all, only metaphorical knickers, not literal ones.



    Replacing the nouns in that expression will just make it seem as if you don't know the idiomatic form. Whatever gender-neutral boxes it might tick, it would fail to be good English.






    share|improve this answer














    There's nothing wrong with "... get your knickers in a twist". It's the idiomatic expression, and it can be applied to anybody regardless of gender or underwear choice. They are, after all, only metaphorical knickers, not literal ones.



    Replacing the nouns in that expression will just make it seem as if you don't know the idiomatic form. Whatever gender-neutral boxes it might tick, it would fail to be good English.







    share|improve this answer













    share|improve this answer




    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 7 hours ago









    Rosie FRosie F

    1,3843 silver badges9 bronze badges




    1,3843 silver badges9 bronze badges















    • Whether there's anything wrong with an expression is a matter of opinion. I am most familiar with US English, and in my opinion (I realize some may disagree), the panties phrase is disrespectful to women. I am guessing I'd have a similar reaction to the knickers version if I were really fluent in UK English, for the same reason, because I checked a dictionary and it said knickers are worn by women. At any rate, thanks for trying to help, but this doesn't answer the question. I didn't ask whether the panties and knickers expressions are problematic. I'd suggest a comment instead.

      – aparente001
      7 hours ago







    • 2





      UK here. It's an entirely idiomatic expression, which means that it's basically lost all meaning. Knickers is certainly the most common form, and equally applicable to both sexes.

      – Andrew Leach
      7 hours ago











    • @aparente001 If you want to avoid disrespect, I’d suggest not using any variant of the saying. It’s intentionally disrespectful to the addressee, so you won’t get away from that no matter what item of clothing you substitute. Like Andrew and Rosie, I don’t perceive any gender bias in the phrase, despite the garment being primarily feminine, but it is disrespectful. You might use “Keep your hair on”, but that has similar, though milder, notes of disrespect. Essentially, I’d say the notion itself is hard to express without disrespect.

      – Janus Bahs Jacquet
      4 hours ago











    • I agree with @Janud Bahs Jacquet - it's always going to be a rude phrase, whatever item of clothing you attempt to substitute. I'd be offended if someone said it to me, and I'd be incensed if they used the 'panties in a bunch' version, which I would also perceive as sexist.

      – Jelila
      4 hours ago











    • @AndrewLeach - I didn't ask whether the knickers expression is problematic. I asked for an alternative that could be used by someone who does not want to use an idiom that includes the word "knickers."

      – aparente001
      2 hours ago


















    • Whether there's anything wrong with an expression is a matter of opinion. I am most familiar with US English, and in my opinion (I realize some may disagree), the panties phrase is disrespectful to women. I am guessing I'd have a similar reaction to the knickers version if I were really fluent in UK English, for the same reason, because I checked a dictionary and it said knickers are worn by women. At any rate, thanks for trying to help, but this doesn't answer the question. I didn't ask whether the panties and knickers expressions are problematic. I'd suggest a comment instead.

      – aparente001
      7 hours ago







    • 2





      UK here. It's an entirely idiomatic expression, which means that it's basically lost all meaning. Knickers is certainly the most common form, and equally applicable to both sexes.

      – Andrew Leach
      7 hours ago











    • @aparente001 If you want to avoid disrespect, I’d suggest not using any variant of the saying. It’s intentionally disrespectful to the addressee, so you won’t get away from that no matter what item of clothing you substitute. Like Andrew and Rosie, I don’t perceive any gender bias in the phrase, despite the garment being primarily feminine, but it is disrespectful. You might use “Keep your hair on”, but that has similar, though milder, notes of disrespect. Essentially, I’d say the notion itself is hard to express without disrespect.

      – Janus Bahs Jacquet
      4 hours ago











    • I agree with @Janud Bahs Jacquet - it's always going to be a rude phrase, whatever item of clothing you attempt to substitute. I'd be offended if someone said it to me, and I'd be incensed if they used the 'panties in a bunch' version, which I would also perceive as sexist.

      – Jelila
      4 hours ago











    • @AndrewLeach - I didn't ask whether the knickers expression is problematic. I asked for an alternative that could be used by someone who does not want to use an idiom that includes the word "knickers."

      – aparente001
      2 hours ago

















    Whether there's anything wrong with an expression is a matter of opinion. I am most familiar with US English, and in my opinion (I realize some may disagree), the panties phrase is disrespectful to women. I am guessing I'd have a similar reaction to the knickers version if I were really fluent in UK English, for the same reason, because I checked a dictionary and it said knickers are worn by women. At any rate, thanks for trying to help, but this doesn't answer the question. I didn't ask whether the panties and knickers expressions are problematic. I'd suggest a comment instead.

    – aparente001
    7 hours ago






    Whether there's anything wrong with an expression is a matter of opinion. I am most familiar with US English, and in my opinion (I realize some may disagree), the panties phrase is disrespectful to women. I am guessing I'd have a similar reaction to the knickers version if I were really fluent in UK English, for the same reason, because I checked a dictionary and it said knickers are worn by women. At any rate, thanks for trying to help, but this doesn't answer the question. I didn't ask whether the panties and knickers expressions are problematic. I'd suggest a comment instead.

    – aparente001
    7 hours ago





    2




    2





    UK here. It's an entirely idiomatic expression, which means that it's basically lost all meaning. Knickers is certainly the most common form, and equally applicable to both sexes.

    – Andrew Leach
    7 hours ago





    UK here. It's an entirely idiomatic expression, which means that it's basically lost all meaning. Knickers is certainly the most common form, and equally applicable to both sexes.

    – Andrew Leach
    7 hours ago













    @aparente001 If you want to avoid disrespect, I’d suggest not using any variant of the saying. It’s intentionally disrespectful to the addressee, so you won’t get away from that no matter what item of clothing you substitute. Like Andrew and Rosie, I don’t perceive any gender bias in the phrase, despite the garment being primarily feminine, but it is disrespectful. You might use “Keep your hair on”, but that has similar, though milder, notes of disrespect. Essentially, I’d say the notion itself is hard to express without disrespect.

    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    4 hours ago





    @aparente001 If you want to avoid disrespect, I’d suggest not using any variant of the saying. It’s intentionally disrespectful to the addressee, so you won’t get away from that no matter what item of clothing you substitute. Like Andrew and Rosie, I don’t perceive any gender bias in the phrase, despite the garment being primarily feminine, but it is disrespectful. You might use “Keep your hair on”, but that has similar, though milder, notes of disrespect. Essentially, I’d say the notion itself is hard to express without disrespect.

    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    4 hours ago













    I agree with @Janud Bahs Jacquet - it's always going to be a rude phrase, whatever item of clothing you attempt to substitute. I'd be offended if someone said it to me, and I'd be incensed if they used the 'panties in a bunch' version, which I would also perceive as sexist.

    – Jelila
    4 hours ago





    I agree with @Janud Bahs Jacquet - it's always going to be a rude phrase, whatever item of clothing you attempt to substitute. I'd be offended if someone said it to me, and I'd be incensed if they used the 'panties in a bunch' version, which I would also perceive as sexist.

    – Jelila
    4 hours ago













    @AndrewLeach - I didn't ask whether the knickers expression is problematic. I asked for an alternative that could be used by someone who does not want to use an idiom that includes the word "knickers."

    – aparente001
    2 hours ago






    @AndrewLeach - I didn't ask whether the knickers expression is problematic. I asked for an alternative that could be used by someone who does not want to use an idiom that includes the word "knickers."

    – aparente001
    2 hours ago














    3


















    Is this affected by region? I believe I've heard "undies in a bunch" most recently, which has the advantage of carrying the rhythm of the original.






    share|improve this answer









    New contributor



    Scample is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





















    • It works for me (US English).... Hopefully it works in UK English too.

      – aparente001
      7 hours ago






    • 1





      The only version with which I, as a British English speaker, am familiar, is "knickers in a twist". All the rest of them sound like more or less clumsy variations on that to me.

      – BoldBen
      6 hours ago












    • @BoldBen - It doesn't need to be an established expression, as long as people can understand it. Consider the undulation example, for instance.

      – aparente001
      2 hours ago















    3


















    Is this affected by region? I believe I've heard "undies in a bunch" most recently, which has the advantage of carrying the rhythm of the original.






    share|improve this answer









    New contributor



    Scample is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





















    • It works for me (US English).... Hopefully it works in UK English too.

      – aparente001
      7 hours ago






    • 1





      The only version with which I, as a British English speaker, am familiar, is "knickers in a twist". All the rest of them sound like more or less clumsy variations on that to me.

      – BoldBen
      6 hours ago












    • @BoldBen - It doesn't need to be an established expression, as long as people can understand it. Consider the undulation example, for instance.

      – aparente001
      2 hours ago













    3














    3










    3









    Is this affected by region? I believe I've heard "undies in a bunch" most recently, which has the advantage of carrying the rhythm of the original.






    share|improve this answer









    New contributor



    Scample is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    Is this affected by region? I believe I've heard "undies in a bunch" most recently, which has the advantage of carrying the rhythm of the original.







    share|improve this answer









    New contributor



    Scample is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.








    share|improve this answer




    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer






    New contributor



    Scample is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.








    answered 7 hours ago









    ScampleScample

    311 bronze badge




    311 bronze badge




    New contributor



    Scample is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.




    New contributor




    Scample is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.

















    • It works for me (US English).... Hopefully it works in UK English too.

      – aparente001
      7 hours ago






    • 1





      The only version with which I, as a British English speaker, am familiar, is "knickers in a twist". All the rest of them sound like more or less clumsy variations on that to me.

      – BoldBen
      6 hours ago












    • @BoldBen - It doesn't need to be an established expression, as long as people can understand it. Consider the undulation example, for instance.

      – aparente001
      2 hours ago

















    • It works for me (US English).... Hopefully it works in UK English too.

      – aparente001
      7 hours ago






    • 1





      The only version with which I, as a British English speaker, am familiar, is "knickers in a twist". All the rest of them sound like more or less clumsy variations on that to me.

      – BoldBen
      6 hours ago












    • @BoldBen - It doesn't need to be an established expression, as long as people can understand it. Consider the undulation example, for instance.

      – aparente001
      2 hours ago
















    It works for me (US English).... Hopefully it works in UK English too.

    – aparente001
    7 hours ago





    It works for me (US English).... Hopefully it works in UK English too.

    – aparente001
    7 hours ago




    1




    1





    The only version with which I, as a British English speaker, am familiar, is "knickers in a twist". All the rest of them sound like more or less clumsy variations on that to me.

    – BoldBen
    6 hours ago






    The only version with which I, as a British English speaker, am familiar, is "knickers in a twist". All the rest of them sound like more or less clumsy variations on that to me.

    – BoldBen
    6 hours ago














    @BoldBen - It doesn't need to be an established expression, as long as people can understand it. Consider the undulation example, for instance.

    – aparente001
    2 hours ago





    @BoldBen - It doesn't need to be an established expression, as long as people can understand it. Consider the undulation example, for instance.

    – aparente001
    2 hours ago











    3


















    Try this:




    I'm not going to get all bent out of shape.




    No gender implied at all, and the meaning is the same (to get upset to distraction about something).




    1. (of a person) Upset or angry.
      Don't get all bent out of shape—I'm sure she didn't mean to insult you.

      You should apologize to Phil before he gets bent out of shape.

      TFD Online






    share|improve this answer




























    • Robusto, you've got the question backwards (along with almost everybody else who's participated on this page). Please see the question update.

      – aparente001
      2 hours ago











    • I see your update but I disagree that I got it wrong. What I and others have replied is true of any pronoun. But note that I did say "I'm not going to get all bent out of shape." You're trying to make a distinction without a difference.

      – Robusto
      2 hours ago












    • Ah, I just read your answer more carefully. I read your earlier answer, prior to your edit, stepped away, and came back and wrote the comment now, without noticing that you had added to your answer. Yes, by jove, I think you've hit on something! This expression works, and it works equally well, in the "you" version and in the "I" version. Thank you.

      – aparente001
      2 hours ago
















    3


















    Try this:




    I'm not going to get all bent out of shape.




    No gender implied at all, and the meaning is the same (to get upset to distraction about something).




    1. (of a person) Upset or angry.
      Don't get all bent out of shape—I'm sure she didn't mean to insult you.

      You should apologize to Phil before he gets bent out of shape.

      TFD Online






    share|improve this answer




























    • Robusto, you've got the question backwards (along with almost everybody else who's participated on this page). Please see the question update.

      – aparente001
      2 hours ago











    • I see your update but I disagree that I got it wrong. What I and others have replied is true of any pronoun. But note that I did say "I'm not going to get all bent out of shape." You're trying to make a distinction without a difference.

      – Robusto
      2 hours ago












    • Ah, I just read your answer more carefully. I read your earlier answer, prior to your edit, stepped away, and came back and wrote the comment now, without noticing that you had added to your answer. Yes, by jove, I think you've hit on something! This expression works, and it works equally well, in the "you" version and in the "I" version. Thank you.

      – aparente001
      2 hours ago














    3














    3










    3









    Try this:




    I'm not going to get all bent out of shape.




    No gender implied at all, and the meaning is the same (to get upset to distraction about something).




    1. (of a person) Upset or angry.
      Don't get all bent out of shape—I'm sure she didn't mean to insult you.

      You should apologize to Phil before he gets bent out of shape.

      TFD Online






    share|improve this answer
















    Try this:




    I'm not going to get all bent out of shape.




    No gender implied at all, and the meaning is the same (to get upset to distraction about something).




    1. (of a person) Upset or angry.
      Don't get all bent out of shape—I'm sure she didn't mean to insult you.

      You should apologize to Phil before he gets bent out of shape.

      TFD Online







    share|improve this answer















    share|improve this answer




    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 4 hours ago

























    answered 4 hours ago









    RobustoRobusto

    132k31 gold badges320 silver badges534 bronze badges




    132k31 gold badges320 silver badges534 bronze badges















    • Robusto, you've got the question backwards (along with almost everybody else who's participated on this page). Please see the question update.

      – aparente001
      2 hours ago











    • I see your update but I disagree that I got it wrong. What I and others have replied is true of any pronoun. But note that I did say "I'm not going to get all bent out of shape." You're trying to make a distinction without a difference.

      – Robusto
      2 hours ago












    • Ah, I just read your answer more carefully. I read your earlier answer, prior to your edit, stepped away, and came back and wrote the comment now, without noticing that you had added to your answer. Yes, by jove, I think you've hit on something! This expression works, and it works equally well, in the "you" version and in the "I" version. Thank you.

      – aparente001
      2 hours ago


















    • Robusto, you've got the question backwards (along with almost everybody else who's participated on this page). Please see the question update.

      – aparente001
      2 hours ago











    • I see your update but I disagree that I got it wrong. What I and others have replied is true of any pronoun. But note that I did say "I'm not going to get all bent out of shape." You're trying to make a distinction without a difference.

      – Robusto
      2 hours ago












    • Ah, I just read your answer more carefully. I read your earlier answer, prior to your edit, stepped away, and came back and wrote the comment now, without noticing that you had added to your answer. Yes, by jove, I think you've hit on something! This expression works, and it works equally well, in the "you" version and in the "I" version. Thank you.

      – aparente001
      2 hours ago

















    Robusto, you've got the question backwards (along with almost everybody else who's participated on this page). Please see the question update.

    – aparente001
    2 hours ago





    Robusto, you've got the question backwards (along with almost everybody else who's participated on this page). Please see the question update.

    – aparente001
    2 hours ago













    I see your update but I disagree that I got it wrong. What I and others have replied is true of any pronoun. But note that I did say "I'm not going to get all bent out of shape." You're trying to make a distinction without a difference.

    – Robusto
    2 hours ago






    I see your update but I disagree that I got it wrong. What I and others have replied is true of any pronoun. But note that I did say "I'm not going to get all bent out of shape." You're trying to make a distinction without a difference.

    – Robusto
    2 hours ago














    Ah, I just read your answer more carefully. I read your earlier answer, prior to your edit, stepped away, and came back and wrote the comment now, without noticing that you had added to your answer. Yes, by jove, I think you've hit on something! This expression works, and it works equally well, in the "you" version and in the "I" version. Thank you.

    – aparente001
    2 hours ago






    Ah, I just read your answer more carefully. I read your earlier answer, prior to your edit, stepped away, and came back and wrote the comment now, without noticing that you had added to your answer. Yes, by jove, I think you've hit on something! This expression works, and it works equally well, in the "you" version and in the "I" version. Thank you.

    – aparente001
    2 hours ago












    2


















    Out of sorts, don't get upset



    You could say 'don't get upset', or 'there's no need to get out of sorts about it'.



    Note that 'knickers in a twist' is a fairly rude phrase. Saying it directly to someone is always going to be really 'fanning the flames' - not calming the situation. You can't convert a rude phrase like this into something polite without changing its very nature.



    Non-rude alternatives are going to need to include genuine care for the person and be calming or assisting the situation.



    You may however, harmlessly use the phrase to talk about someone out of their earshot, like 'my boss really got his knickers in a twist about my lateness'. But if he overheard you saying it - that would be baaaad! Sooo. Bad.



    Note that in UK English we use the expression for men or women, still with 'knickers'.



    Why? Well it's even more funny!



    Postscript:



    'knickers in a twist' is a way of saying 'I perceive that something, under the surface, unseen, may be troubling you'. You need therapist-level sensitivity, to be able to pull off saying that to somebody without enraging them.






    share|improve this answer




























    • (Please see clarifying update in question.) What do you think about Scample's proposal of the undies?

      – aparente001
      2 hours ago











    • "Get upset" does work -- but it's a bit flavorless. I think "bent out of shape" sounds more like an expression or idiom. // Thanks for explaining the funny aspect in the UK of men referring to the knickers.

      – aparente001
      1 hour ago
















    2


















    Out of sorts, don't get upset



    You could say 'don't get upset', or 'there's no need to get out of sorts about it'.



    Note that 'knickers in a twist' is a fairly rude phrase. Saying it directly to someone is always going to be really 'fanning the flames' - not calming the situation. You can't convert a rude phrase like this into something polite without changing its very nature.



    Non-rude alternatives are going to need to include genuine care for the person and be calming or assisting the situation.



    You may however, harmlessly use the phrase to talk about someone out of their earshot, like 'my boss really got his knickers in a twist about my lateness'. But if he overheard you saying it - that would be baaaad! Sooo. Bad.



    Note that in UK English we use the expression for men or women, still with 'knickers'.



    Why? Well it's even more funny!



    Postscript:



    'knickers in a twist' is a way of saying 'I perceive that something, under the surface, unseen, may be troubling you'. You need therapist-level sensitivity, to be able to pull off saying that to somebody without enraging them.






    share|improve this answer




























    • (Please see clarifying update in question.) What do you think about Scample's proposal of the undies?

      – aparente001
      2 hours ago











    • "Get upset" does work -- but it's a bit flavorless. I think "bent out of shape" sounds more like an expression or idiom. // Thanks for explaining the funny aspect in the UK of men referring to the knickers.

      – aparente001
      1 hour ago














    2














    2










    2









    Out of sorts, don't get upset



    You could say 'don't get upset', or 'there's no need to get out of sorts about it'.



    Note that 'knickers in a twist' is a fairly rude phrase. Saying it directly to someone is always going to be really 'fanning the flames' - not calming the situation. You can't convert a rude phrase like this into something polite without changing its very nature.



    Non-rude alternatives are going to need to include genuine care for the person and be calming or assisting the situation.



    You may however, harmlessly use the phrase to talk about someone out of their earshot, like 'my boss really got his knickers in a twist about my lateness'. But if he overheard you saying it - that would be baaaad! Sooo. Bad.



    Note that in UK English we use the expression for men or women, still with 'knickers'.



    Why? Well it's even more funny!



    Postscript:



    'knickers in a twist' is a way of saying 'I perceive that something, under the surface, unseen, may be troubling you'. You need therapist-level sensitivity, to be able to pull off saying that to somebody without enraging them.






    share|improve this answer
















    Out of sorts, don't get upset



    You could say 'don't get upset', or 'there's no need to get out of sorts about it'.



    Note that 'knickers in a twist' is a fairly rude phrase. Saying it directly to someone is always going to be really 'fanning the flames' - not calming the situation. You can't convert a rude phrase like this into something polite without changing its very nature.



    Non-rude alternatives are going to need to include genuine care for the person and be calming or assisting the situation.



    You may however, harmlessly use the phrase to talk about someone out of their earshot, like 'my boss really got his knickers in a twist about my lateness'. But if he overheard you saying it - that would be baaaad! Sooo. Bad.



    Note that in UK English we use the expression for men or women, still with 'knickers'.



    Why? Well it's even more funny!



    Postscript:



    'knickers in a twist' is a way of saying 'I perceive that something, under the surface, unseen, may be troubling you'. You need therapist-level sensitivity, to be able to pull off saying that to somebody without enraging them.







    share|improve this answer















    share|improve this answer




    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 3 hours ago

























    answered 4 hours ago









    JelilaJelila

    4,3091 gold badge3 silver badges21 bronze badges




    4,3091 gold badge3 silver badges21 bronze badges















    • (Please see clarifying update in question.) What do you think about Scample's proposal of the undies?

      – aparente001
      2 hours ago











    • "Get upset" does work -- but it's a bit flavorless. I think "bent out of shape" sounds more like an expression or idiom. // Thanks for explaining the funny aspect in the UK of men referring to the knickers.

      – aparente001
      1 hour ago


















    • (Please see clarifying update in question.) What do you think about Scample's proposal of the undies?

      – aparente001
      2 hours ago











    • "Get upset" does work -- but it's a bit flavorless. I think "bent out of shape" sounds more like an expression or idiom. // Thanks for explaining the funny aspect in the UK of men referring to the knickers.

      – aparente001
      1 hour ago

















    (Please see clarifying update in question.) What do you think about Scample's proposal of the undies?

    – aparente001
    2 hours ago





    (Please see clarifying update in question.) What do you think about Scample's proposal of the undies?

    – aparente001
    2 hours ago













    "Get upset" does work -- but it's a bit flavorless. I think "bent out of shape" sounds more like an expression or idiom. // Thanks for explaining the funny aspect in the UK of men referring to the knickers.

    – aparente001
    1 hour ago






    "Get upset" does work -- but it's a bit flavorless. I think "bent out of shape" sounds more like an expression or idiom. // Thanks for explaining the funny aspect in the UK of men referring to the knickers.

    – aparente001
    1 hour ago












    0


















    There are some proposals written by a Jacob Weeks on Quora:




    Growing up I read a lot of Andy Griffiths books, and my answer is
    heavily influenced by that fact. My chosen phrases are:



    • Don't get your knickers in a knot

    • Don't get your trousers in a twist

    Here are some that I have concocted:



    • Don't get your slacks in a swivel


    • Don't get your jeans in a jerk


    I also came up with this one, but I don't think it has quite the same
    ring to it:



    • Don't get your underwear into an undulation



    The first two are too gender-suggestive; the jeans won't work because jerk isn't a gracious word; slacks might work but I think the undulation is funnier, so that's my current best candidate.






    share|improve this answer
































      0


















      There are some proposals written by a Jacob Weeks on Quora:




      Growing up I read a lot of Andy Griffiths books, and my answer is
      heavily influenced by that fact. My chosen phrases are:



      • Don't get your knickers in a knot

      • Don't get your trousers in a twist

      Here are some that I have concocted:



      • Don't get your slacks in a swivel


      • Don't get your jeans in a jerk


      I also came up with this one, but I don't think it has quite the same
      ring to it:



      • Don't get your underwear into an undulation



      The first two are too gender-suggestive; the jeans won't work because jerk isn't a gracious word; slacks might work but I think the undulation is funnier, so that's my current best candidate.






      share|improve this answer






























        0














        0










        0









        There are some proposals written by a Jacob Weeks on Quora:




        Growing up I read a lot of Andy Griffiths books, and my answer is
        heavily influenced by that fact. My chosen phrases are:



        • Don't get your knickers in a knot

        • Don't get your trousers in a twist

        Here are some that I have concocted:



        • Don't get your slacks in a swivel


        • Don't get your jeans in a jerk


        I also came up with this one, but I don't think it has quite the same
        ring to it:



        • Don't get your underwear into an undulation



        The first two are too gender-suggestive; the jeans won't work because jerk isn't a gracious word; slacks might work but I think the undulation is funnier, so that's my current best candidate.






        share|improve this answer
















        There are some proposals written by a Jacob Weeks on Quora:




        Growing up I read a lot of Andy Griffiths books, and my answer is
        heavily influenced by that fact. My chosen phrases are:



        • Don't get your knickers in a knot

        • Don't get your trousers in a twist

        Here are some that I have concocted:



        • Don't get your slacks in a swivel


        • Don't get your jeans in a jerk


        I also came up with this one, but I don't think it has quite the same
        ring to it:



        • Don't get your underwear into an undulation



        The first two are too gender-suggestive; the jeans won't work because jerk isn't a gracious word; slacks might work but I think the undulation is funnier, so that's my current best candidate.







        share|improve this answer















        share|improve this answer




        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        answered 8 hours ago


























        community wiki





        aparente001

























            0


















            I have always liked "I won't get my undies in a bundle". Though, technically, undies usually refer to woman/girl underwear, it doesn't necessarily always refer to female underwear.






            share|improve this answer









            New contributor



            Wordsmyth is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





















            • Oh shoot. I just checked a dictionary and saw that you're right, undies are apparently primarily for girls and women. I was thinking this was going to work when @Scample proposed it. Oh well, back to the drawing board.

              – aparente001
              2 hours ago















            0


















            I have always liked "I won't get my undies in a bundle". Though, technically, undies usually refer to woman/girl underwear, it doesn't necessarily always refer to female underwear.






            share|improve this answer









            New contributor



            Wordsmyth is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





















            • Oh shoot. I just checked a dictionary and saw that you're right, undies are apparently primarily for girls and women. I was thinking this was going to work when @Scample proposed it. Oh well, back to the drawing board.

              – aparente001
              2 hours ago













            0














            0










            0









            I have always liked "I won't get my undies in a bundle". Though, technically, undies usually refer to woman/girl underwear, it doesn't necessarily always refer to female underwear.






            share|improve this answer









            New contributor



            Wordsmyth is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            I have always liked "I won't get my undies in a bundle". Though, technically, undies usually refer to woman/girl underwear, it doesn't necessarily always refer to female underwear.







            share|improve this answer









            New contributor



            Wordsmyth is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.








            share|improve this answer




            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer






            New contributor



            Wordsmyth is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.








            answered 4 hours ago









            WordsmythWordsmyth

            1




            1




            New contributor



            Wordsmyth is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.




            New contributor




            Wordsmyth is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.

















            • Oh shoot. I just checked a dictionary and saw that you're right, undies are apparently primarily for girls and women. I was thinking this was going to work when @Scample proposed it. Oh well, back to the drawing board.

              – aparente001
              2 hours ago

















            • Oh shoot. I just checked a dictionary and saw that you're right, undies are apparently primarily for girls and women. I was thinking this was going to work when @Scample proposed it. Oh well, back to the drawing board.

              – aparente001
              2 hours ago
















            Oh shoot. I just checked a dictionary and saw that you're right, undies are apparently primarily for girls and women. I was thinking this was going to work when @Scample proposed it. Oh well, back to the drawing board.

            – aparente001
            2 hours ago





            Oh shoot. I just checked a dictionary and saw that you're right, undies are apparently primarily for girls and women. I was thinking this was going to work when @Scample proposed it. Oh well, back to the drawing board.

            – aparente001
            2 hours ago


















            draft saved

            draft discarded















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f514842%2fwhat-is-a-gender-neutral-equivalent-for-the-following-phrase%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown









            Popular posts from this blog

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            199年 目錄 大件事 到箇年出世嗰人 到箇年死嗰人 節慶、風俗習慣 導覽選單