Can Superspeed Cause Illusions?Everything Joe says will become true. Can anybody notice?What would be an actual real life mechanisms of an accelerated healing factor?What required secondary powers does my speedster need in order to be able to accelerate at 2,250 ft/s^2 without harmful effects?How would a person be able to attain superspeed if they could subvert Newton's 2nd Law of Motion?

Can we not simply connect a battery to a RAM to prevent data loss during power cuts?

Slaad Chaos Phage: Weak Combat Ability?

Can you upgrade armour from breastplate to halfplate?

How can a "proper" function have a vertical slope?

How can I prove mathematically the reflection matrix has only the eigenvalues 1 or -1?

Front hydraulic disk brake is too powerful on MTB — solutions?

What are the branches of statistics?

How to create a vimrc macro using :sort?

Novel with a mix of real world and gods

Is anyone against the rational teachings of Maimonides?

How does Firefox know my ISP login page?

Usefulness of Nash embedding theorem

Do businesses save their customers' credit card information until the payment is finalized?

What does the British parliament hope to achieve by requesting a third Brexit extension?

What could possibly power an Alcubierre drive?

What‘s wrong with my proof of the Law of Total Variance?

What is "demographic engineering" and how does it differ from ethnic cleansing?

Why exactly is the answer 50 ohms?

2 Guards, 3 Keys, 2 Locks

3-prong to 4-prong conversion - EXTRA MISLABELLED WIRES - Dryer cable upgrade and installation

Why do adjectives come before nouns in English?

My Villain scrys on the party, but I forgot about the sensor!

Incorrect mmap behavior when assembly files included in the project

'Pound' meaning in this context



Can Superspeed Cause Illusions?


Everything Joe says will become true. Can anybody notice?What would be an actual real life mechanisms of an accelerated healing factor?What required secondary powers does my speedster need in order to be able to accelerate at 2,250 ft/s^2 without harmful effects?How would a person be able to attain superspeed if they could subvert Newton's 2nd Law of Motion?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;

.everyonelovesstackoverflowposition:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;








1














$begingroup$


My story involves people with supernatural abilities. I want to create a character that has classic superspeed like the comic book superhero The Flash, but I want my character to only have realistic applications of such a power.



Some applications I have already debunked:



  • Saving people: Grabbing people at lightning speed and then transporting them out of harm's way would just turn their insides into jelly, due to the sudden changes in speed. (Law of Conversation of Momentum) I do not accept mystical reasons like "the speed force protects them while in transit". In my story there is no "speed force".

  • Running up completely vertical walls indefinitely: Friction is needed to go up the wall. But to get friction, one needs to press their feet against the wall, which pushes them away from it. And then eventually they're not close enough to keep running up the wall.

  • Super speed in general: At higher speeds, the user would superheat the area around themselves, incinerating objects and people around themselves. This is caused by the friction of the air molecules; the same reason most objects burn up during atmospheric entry.

  • Time travel: This is just stupid, to be honest.

  • The list goes on

It seems that most of the applications used in comics are actually impossible. There is one that has caught my attention, though: the ability to create illusions.



According to the theory, if a person moves fast enough, they can move back and forth at a speed great enough to cast the illusion of duplicates.



Is it possible to cause completely opaque illusions by moving back and forth at incredible speeds?



Let's say that a person spends 49.9999% of their time in one pose, and 49.9999% of their time in another pose. The remaining 0.0002% is spent transitioning between the two different poses.



My theory: An outside observer would see two poses that are roughly 50% transparent. After all, each pose can't be in each location 100% of the time.



A good example is that when you look at a ceiling fan turned on high, you can see everything that is behind the fan at the same time. A helicopter's propellers show this phenomenon, as well.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Going up the wall is not completely impossible. You just have to flap your arms fast enough to give you enough push to stay in contact with the wall. Of course, then you could fly...
    $endgroup$
    – puppetsock
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I mean, I said running which means you use your feet.
    $endgroup$
    – overlord
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Scientifically speaking, even horizontal running is problematic for speedsters. As the speed increases, the hero would go airborne and the locomotion would resemble hopping on the Moon.
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How do you compensate for air friction and make sure your person doesn't burst into flames like a shuttle upon re-entry?
    $endgroup$
    – kleer001
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @kleer001 stay well hydrated.
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    7 hours ago

















1














$begingroup$


My story involves people with supernatural abilities. I want to create a character that has classic superspeed like the comic book superhero The Flash, but I want my character to only have realistic applications of such a power.



Some applications I have already debunked:



  • Saving people: Grabbing people at lightning speed and then transporting them out of harm's way would just turn their insides into jelly, due to the sudden changes in speed. (Law of Conversation of Momentum) I do not accept mystical reasons like "the speed force protects them while in transit". In my story there is no "speed force".

  • Running up completely vertical walls indefinitely: Friction is needed to go up the wall. But to get friction, one needs to press their feet against the wall, which pushes them away from it. And then eventually they're not close enough to keep running up the wall.

  • Super speed in general: At higher speeds, the user would superheat the area around themselves, incinerating objects and people around themselves. This is caused by the friction of the air molecules; the same reason most objects burn up during atmospheric entry.

  • Time travel: This is just stupid, to be honest.

  • The list goes on

It seems that most of the applications used in comics are actually impossible. There is one that has caught my attention, though: the ability to create illusions.



According to the theory, if a person moves fast enough, they can move back and forth at a speed great enough to cast the illusion of duplicates.



Is it possible to cause completely opaque illusions by moving back and forth at incredible speeds?



Let's say that a person spends 49.9999% of their time in one pose, and 49.9999% of their time in another pose. The remaining 0.0002% is spent transitioning between the two different poses.



My theory: An outside observer would see two poses that are roughly 50% transparent. After all, each pose can't be in each location 100% of the time.



A good example is that when you look at a ceiling fan turned on high, you can see everything that is behind the fan at the same time. A helicopter's propellers show this phenomenon, as well.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Going up the wall is not completely impossible. You just have to flap your arms fast enough to give you enough push to stay in contact with the wall. Of course, then you could fly...
    $endgroup$
    – puppetsock
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I mean, I said running which means you use your feet.
    $endgroup$
    – overlord
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Scientifically speaking, even horizontal running is problematic for speedsters. As the speed increases, the hero would go airborne and the locomotion would resemble hopping on the Moon.
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How do you compensate for air friction and make sure your person doesn't burst into flames like a shuttle upon re-entry?
    $endgroup$
    – kleer001
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @kleer001 stay well hydrated.
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    7 hours ago













1












1








1





$begingroup$


My story involves people with supernatural abilities. I want to create a character that has classic superspeed like the comic book superhero The Flash, but I want my character to only have realistic applications of such a power.



Some applications I have already debunked:



  • Saving people: Grabbing people at lightning speed and then transporting them out of harm's way would just turn their insides into jelly, due to the sudden changes in speed. (Law of Conversation of Momentum) I do not accept mystical reasons like "the speed force protects them while in transit". In my story there is no "speed force".

  • Running up completely vertical walls indefinitely: Friction is needed to go up the wall. But to get friction, one needs to press their feet against the wall, which pushes them away from it. And then eventually they're not close enough to keep running up the wall.

  • Super speed in general: At higher speeds, the user would superheat the area around themselves, incinerating objects and people around themselves. This is caused by the friction of the air molecules; the same reason most objects burn up during atmospheric entry.

  • Time travel: This is just stupid, to be honest.

  • The list goes on

It seems that most of the applications used in comics are actually impossible. There is one that has caught my attention, though: the ability to create illusions.



According to the theory, if a person moves fast enough, they can move back and forth at a speed great enough to cast the illusion of duplicates.



Is it possible to cause completely opaque illusions by moving back and forth at incredible speeds?



Let's say that a person spends 49.9999% of their time in one pose, and 49.9999% of their time in another pose. The remaining 0.0002% is spent transitioning between the two different poses.



My theory: An outside observer would see two poses that are roughly 50% transparent. After all, each pose can't be in each location 100% of the time.



A good example is that when you look at a ceiling fan turned on high, you can see everything that is behind the fan at the same time. A helicopter's propellers show this phenomenon, as well.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




My story involves people with supernatural abilities. I want to create a character that has classic superspeed like the comic book superhero The Flash, but I want my character to only have realistic applications of such a power.



Some applications I have already debunked:



  • Saving people: Grabbing people at lightning speed and then transporting them out of harm's way would just turn their insides into jelly, due to the sudden changes in speed. (Law of Conversation of Momentum) I do not accept mystical reasons like "the speed force protects them while in transit". In my story there is no "speed force".

  • Running up completely vertical walls indefinitely: Friction is needed to go up the wall. But to get friction, one needs to press their feet against the wall, which pushes them away from it. And then eventually they're not close enough to keep running up the wall.

  • Super speed in general: At higher speeds, the user would superheat the area around themselves, incinerating objects and people around themselves. This is caused by the friction of the air molecules; the same reason most objects burn up during atmospheric entry.

  • Time travel: This is just stupid, to be honest.

  • The list goes on

It seems that most of the applications used in comics are actually impossible. There is one that has caught my attention, though: the ability to create illusions.



According to the theory, if a person moves fast enough, they can move back and forth at a speed great enough to cast the illusion of duplicates.



Is it possible to cause completely opaque illusions by moving back and forth at incredible speeds?



Let's say that a person spends 49.9999% of their time in one pose, and 49.9999% of their time in another pose. The remaining 0.0002% is spent transitioning between the two different poses.



My theory: An outside observer would see two poses that are roughly 50% transparent. After all, each pose can't be in each location 100% of the time.



A good example is that when you look at a ceiling fan turned on high, you can see everything that is behind the fan at the same time. A helicopter's propellers show this phenomenon, as well.







reality-check super-powers






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question



share|improve this question










asked 8 hours ago









overlordoverlord

1,4134 silver badges21 bronze badges




1,4134 silver badges21 bronze badges










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Going up the wall is not completely impossible. You just have to flap your arms fast enough to give you enough push to stay in contact with the wall. Of course, then you could fly...
    $endgroup$
    – puppetsock
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I mean, I said running which means you use your feet.
    $endgroup$
    – overlord
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Scientifically speaking, even horizontal running is problematic for speedsters. As the speed increases, the hero would go airborne and the locomotion would resemble hopping on the Moon.
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How do you compensate for air friction and make sure your person doesn't burst into flames like a shuttle upon re-entry?
    $endgroup$
    – kleer001
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @kleer001 stay well hydrated.
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    7 hours ago












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Going up the wall is not completely impossible. You just have to flap your arms fast enough to give you enough push to stay in contact with the wall. Of course, then you could fly...
    $endgroup$
    – puppetsock
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I mean, I said running which means you use your feet.
    $endgroup$
    – overlord
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Scientifically speaking, even horizontal running is problematic for speedsters. As the speed increases, the hero would go airborne and the locomotion would resemble hopping on the Moon.
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How do you compensate for air friction and make sure your person doesn't burst into flames like a shuttle upon re-entry?
    $endgroup$
    – kleer001
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @kleer001 stay well hydrated.
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    7 hours ago







2




2




$begingroup$
Going up the wall is not completely impossible. You just have to flap your arms fast enough to give you enough push to stay in contact with the wall. Of course, then you could fly...
$endgroup$
– puppetsock
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
Going up the wall is not completely impossible. You just have to flap your arms fast enough to give you enough push to stay in contact with the wall. Of course, then you could fly...
$endgroup$
– puppetsock
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
I mean, I said running which means you use your feet.
$endgroup$
– overlord
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
I mean, I said running which means you use your feet.
$endgroup$
– overlord
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
Scientifically speaking, even horizontal running is problematic for speedsters. As the speed increases, the hero would go airborne and the locomotion would resemble hopping on the Moon.
$endgroup$
– Alexander
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
Scientifically speaking, even horizontal running is problematic for speedsters. As the speed increases, the hero would go airborne and the locomotion would resemble hopping on the Moon.
$endgroup$
– Alexander
8 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
How do you compensate for air friction and make sure your person doesn't burst into flames like a shuttle upon re-entry?
$endgroup$
– kleer001
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
How do you compensate for air friction and make sure your person doesn't burst into flames like a shuttle upon re-entry?
$endgroup$
– kleer001
7 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@kleer001 stay well hydrated.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
@kleer001 stay well hydrated.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
7 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















6
















$begingroup$

I don't think it's possible while remaining within the bounds relative plausibility. This character has to be so fast that even The Flash might raise an eyebrow. I'll call the character UberFlash.



So, let's say UberFlash tries to create two "illusions". He stands in one spot, then quickly goes to another and back. Visual diagram:



A <---> B


This has to be done multiple times a second. About the lowest frames per second you can get nowadays in video games is 30FPS. That means that an image is shown 30 times on the screen each second. This makes the transition between images seem like it's (mostly) non-existent and it's actually a continuous video. Some people can easily distinguish 30 FPS, as it "flickers" or "looks choppy" and otherwise doesn't maintains good illusion for a smooth stream of visual data. Still, I'm going to use 30 FPS as the baseline for UberFlash.



Running to each spot 30 times.



So, UberFlash has to show up in two places and stand at each 30 times over the course of one second. So he has to move between A and B 29 times in a second.



Taking the proposed 0.0002% of time spend travelling, then UberFlash will have to move the ENTIRE distance 29 times in 0.0002% of a second, or 2 microseconds. For further reference, that's 0.002 milliseconds. That is the TOTAL time to make 29 trips. Let's say the two "illusions" are fairly close - 1m apart. If both "illusions held their hands outstretched, they would be touching or even overlapping.



(29 * 1m) / 0.002ms = ???



UberFlash has to be moving at about 14 500 m/s or 52 200 km/h. UberFlash can run a marathon in just under 3 seconds.



Mach 1 speed (speed of sound) is about 1 235 km/h and going over it produces a sonic boom. UberFlash would be moving at roughly 42 times that speed. I don't think it would be very subtle or very safe for...anybody and anything.



Running to each spot 10 times



But perhaps 30FPS is too high. The "illusions" don't need to be perfect. Let's cut it down to 10 FPS - it will produce noticeable flickering of the images. Let's also make the distance smaller - 50cm, the two are almost shoulder to shoulder. Oh, and let's give UberFlash a bit more leniency - instead of 0.002 milliseconds, let's make it few orders of magnitude more and give him 1 millisecond. Just 1/1000th of a second to travel between the two locations.



(9*0.5m) / 1ms = ???



That means that UberFlash will move at 4 500 m/s or 16 200 km/h. Still more than 10 times the sonic boom speeds.



I think at these speeds, aside from the images of UberFlash, there would be some high winds, loud noises, and maybe even flames around.






share|improve this answer












$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Mach 10 at sea level will cause enough aerodynamic heating to incinerate pretty much everything. The Sprint missile needed a super aerodynamic shape with no control fins and an ablative heat shield and generated a plasma sheath.
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Oh, and also consider the bone-liquifying accelerations required to reach mach 10 in under a millisecond and slow down to a stop in less than a millisecond afterwards.
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @StarfishPrime I guess any onlookers would be too busy being dead to notice that the illusions are not perfect.
    $endgroup$
    – VLAZ
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I don't think it would be fatal... extremely unpleasant and probably resulting in permanent deafness, if you were close enough. You probably wouldn't have to be too far away to avoid that, too. It would rather spoil the illusion though.
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Uberflash says, "Stand further back! I promise, this is cool... at a distance!"
    $endgroup$
    – SRM
    3 hours ago


















0
















$begingroup$

As long as you are above 60 frames (transitions from one location to the other) per second, most humans will see two people. This is how films work. At 120 FPS, it’ll be indistinguishable from two people standing there to all biological observers and most cameras.



Note that the continuous peals of thunder as you shift back and forth may give you away. :-) Also will have problem in fog — a clear channel between your two positions will open.






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$










  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Human eyes don’t actually have a ‘frame rate’ like film. It’s a handy lie, but it’s nowhere near as simple as FPS, so I’m not sure this wouldn’t just cause a blur that’s oddly solid at either end.
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Bloggs
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm pretty sure some people will notice the two shapes "flickering". Maybe not all but people can and do notice frame transitions. Also, this requires moving between the two locations in such high speed that you'll even give The Flash a run for his money.
    $endgroup$
    – VLAZ
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    That's not how human perception works, that's not how light works. It is how cameras work, so your answer would be fine for security cameras. But that wasn't really OPs question.
    $endgroup$
    – kleer001
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Much research has been done on this... the flicker fusion threshold is about 60hz but fast eye movements can result in much higher frequency flickering becoming apparent, even up as high as 500hz.
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    7 hours ago












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);














draft saved

draft discarded
















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f157834%2fcan-superspeed-cause-illusions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown


























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









6
















$begingroup$

I don't think it's possible while remaining within the bounds relative plausibility. This character has to be so fast that even The Flash might raise an eyebrow. I'll call the character UberFlash.



So, let's say UberFlash tries to create two "illusions". He stands in one spot, then quickly goes to another and back. Visual diagram:



A <---> B


This has to be done multiple times a second. About the lowest frames per second you can get nowadays in video games is 30FPS. That means that an image is shown 30 times on the screen each second. This makes the transition between images seem like it's (mostly) non-existent and it's actually a continuous video. Some people can easily distinguish 30 FPS, as it "flickers" or "looks choppy" and otherwise doesn't maintains good illusion for a smooth stream of visual data. Still, I'm going to use 30 FPS as the baseline for UberFlash.



Running to each spot 30 times.



So, UberFlash has to show up in two places and stand at each 30 times over the course of one second. So he has to move between A and B 29 times in a second.



Taking the proposed 0.0002% of time spend travelling, then UberFlash will have to move the ENTIRE distance 29 times in 0.0002% of a second, or 2 microseconds. For further reference, that's 0.002 milliseconds. That is the TOTAL time to make 29 trips. Let's say the two "illusions" are fairly close - 1m apart. If both "illusions held their hands outstretched, they would be touching or even overlapping.



(29 * 1m) / 0.002ms = ???



UberFlash has to be moving at about 14 500 m/s or 52 200 km/h. UberFlash can run a marathon in just under 3 seconds.



Mach 1 speed (speed of sound) is about 1 235 km/h and going over it produces a sonic boom. UberFlash would be moving at roughly 42 times that speed. I don't think it would be very subtle or very safe for...anybody and anything.



Running to each spot 10 times



But perhaps 30FPS is too high. The "illusions" don't need to be perfect. Let's cut it down to 10 FPS - it will produce noticeable flickering of the images. Let's also make the distance smaller - 50cm, the two are almost shoulder to shoulder. Oh, and let's give UberFlash a bit more leniency - instead of 0.002 milliseconds, let's make it few orders of magnitude more and give him 1 millisecond. Just 1/1000th of a second to travel between the two locations.



(9*0.5m) / 1ms = ???



That means that UberFlash will move at 4 500 m/s or 16 200 km/h. Still more than 10 times the sonic boom speeds.



I think at these speeds, aside from the images of UberFlash, there would be some high winds, loud noises, and maybe even flames around.






share|improve this answer












$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Mach 10 at sea level will cause enough aerodynamic heating to incinerate pretty much everything. The Sprint missile needed a super aerodynamic shape with no control fins and an ablative heat shield and generated a plasma sheath.
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Oh, and also consider the bone-liquifying accelerations required to reach mach 10 in under a millisecond and slow down to a stop in less than a millisecond afterwards.
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @StarfishPrime I guess any onlookers would be too busy being dead to notice that the illusions are not perfect.
    $endgroup$
    – VLAZ
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I don't think it would be fatal... extremely unpleasant and probably resulting in permanent deafness, if you were close enough. You probably wouldn't have to be too far away to avoid that, too. It would rather spoil the illusion though.
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Uberflash says, "Stand further back! I promise, this is cool... at a distance!"
    $endgroup$
    – SRM
    3 hours ago















6
















$begingroup$

I don't think it's possible while remaining within the bounds relative plausibility. This character has to be so fast that even The Flash might raise an eyebrow. I'll call the character UberFlash.



So, let's say UberFlash tries to create two "illusions". He stands in one spot, then quickly goes to another and back. Visual diagram:



A <---> B


This has to be done multiple times a second. About the lowest frames per second you can get nowadays in video games is 30FPS. That means that an image is shown 30 times on the screen each second. This makes the transition between images seem like it's (mostly) non-existent and it's actually a continuous video. Some people can easily distinguish 30 FPS, as it "flickers" or "looks choppy" and otherwise doesn't maintains good illusion for a smooth stream of visual data. Still, I'm going to use 30 FPS as the baseline for UberFlash.



Running to each spot 30 times.



So, UberFlash has to show up in two places and stand at each 30 times over the course of one second. So he has to move between A and B 29 times in a second.



Taking the proposed 0.0002% of time spend travelling, then UberFlash will have to move the ENTIRE distance 29 times in 0.0002% of a second, or 2 microseconds. For further reference, that's 0.002 milliseconds. That is the TOTAL time to make 29 trips. Let's say the two "illusions" are fairly close - 1m apart. If both "illusions held their hands outstretched, they would be touching or even overlapping.



(29 * 1m) / 0.002ms = ???



UberFlash has to be moving at about 14 500 m/s or 52 200 km/h. UberFlash can run a marathon in just under 3 seconds.



Mach 1 speed (speed of sound) is about 1 235 km/h and going over it produces a sonic boom. UberFlash would be moving at roughly 42 times that speed. I don't think it would be very subtle or very safe for...anybody and anything.



Running to each spot 10 times



But perhaps 30FPS is too high. The "illusions" don't need to be perfect. Let's cut it down to 10 FPS - it will produce noticeable flickering of the images. Let's also make the distance smaller - 50cm, the two are almost shoulder to shoulder. Oh, and let's give UberFlash a bit more leniency - instead of 0.002 milliseconds, let's make it few orders of magnitude more and give him 1 millisecond. Just 1/1000th of a second to travel between the two locations.



(9*0.5m) / 1ms = ???



That means that UberFlash will move at 4 500 m/s or 16 200 km/h. Still more than 10 times the sonic boom speeds.



I think at these speeds, aside from the images of UberFlash, there would be some high winds, loud noises, and maybe even flames around.






share|improve this answer












$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Mach 10 at sea level will cause enough aerodynamic heating to incinerate pretty much everything. The Sprint missile needed a super aerodynamic shape with no control fins and an ablative heat shield and generated a plasma sheath.
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Oh, and also consider the bone-liquifying accelerations required to reach mach 10 in under a millisecond and slow down to a stop in less than a millisecond afterwards.
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @StarfishPrime I guess any onlookers would be too busy being dead to notice that the illusions are not perfect.
    $endgroup$
    – VLAZ
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I don't think it would be fatal... extremely unpleasant and probably resulting in permanent deafness, if you were close enough. You probably wouldn't have to be too far away to avoid that, too. It would rather spoil the illusion though.
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Uberflash says, "Stand further back! I promise, this is cool... at a distance!"
    $endgroup$
    – SRM
    3 hours ago













6














6










6







$begingroup$

I don't think it's possible while remaining within the bounds relative plausibility. This character has to be so fast that even The Flash might raise an eyebrow. I'll call the character UberFlash.



So, let's say UberFlash tries to create two "illusions". He stands in one spot, then quickly goes to another and back. Visual diagram:



A <---> B


This has to be done multiple times a second. About the lowest frames per second you can get nowadays in video games is 30FPS. That means that an image is shown 30 times on the screen each second. This makes the transition between images seem like it's (mostly) non-existent and it's actually a continuous video. Some people can easily distinguish 30 FPS, as it "flickers" or "looks choppy" and otherwise doesn't maintains good illusion for a smooth stream of visual data. Still, I'm going to use 30 FPS as the baseline for UberFlash.



Running to each spot 30 times.



So, UberFlash has to show up in two places and stand at each 30 times over the course of one second. So he has to move between A and B 29 times in a second.



Taking the proposed 0.0002% of time spend travelling, then UberFlash will have to move the ENTIRE distance 29 times in 0.0002% of a second, or 2 microseconds. For further reference, that's 0.002 milliseconds. That is the TOTAL time to make 29 trips. Let's say the two "illusions" are fairly close - 1m apart. If both "illusions held their hands outstretched, they would be touching or even overlapping.



(29 * 1m) / 0.002ms = ???



UberFlash has to be moving at about 14 500 m/s or 52 200 km/h. UberFlash can run a marathon in just under 3 seconds.



Mach 1 speed (speed of sound) is about 1 235 km/h and going over it produces a sonic boom. UberFlash would be moving at roughly 42 times that speed. I don't think it would be very subtle or very safe for...anybody and anything.



Running to each spot 10 times



But perhaps 30FPS is too high. The "illusions" don't need to be perfect. Let's cut it down to 10 FPS - it will produce noticeable flickering of the images. Let's also make the distance smaller - 50cm, the two are almost shoulder to shoulder. Oh, and let's give UberFlash a bit more leniency - instead of 0.002 milliseconds, let's make it few orders of magnitude more and give him 1 millisecond. Just 1/1000th of a second to travel between the two locations.



(9*0.5m) / 1ms = ???



That means that UberFlash will move at 4 500 m/s or 16 200 km/h. Still more than 10 times the sonic boom speeds.



I think at these speeds, aside from the images of UberFlash, there would be some high winds, loud noises, and maybe even flames around.






share|improve this answer












$endgroup$



I don't think it's possible while remaining within the bounds relative plausibility. This character has to be so fast that even The Flash might raise an eyebrow. I'll call the character UberFlash.



So, let's say UberFlash tries to create two "illusions". He stands in one spot, then quickly goes to another and back. Visual diagram:



A <---> B


This has to be done multiple times a second. About the lowest frames per second you can get nowadays in video games is 30FPS. That means that an image is shown 30 times on the screen each second. This makes the transition between images seem like it's (mostly) non-existent and it's actually a continuous video. Some people can easily distinguish 30 FPS, as it "flickers" or "looks choppy" and otherwise doesn't maintains good illusion for a smooth stream of visual data. Still, I'm going to use 30 FPS as the baseline for UberFlash.



Running to each spot 30 times.



So, UberFlash has to show up in two places and stand at each 30 times over the course of one second. So he has to move between A and B 29 times in a second.



Taking the proposed 0.0002% of time spend travelling, then UberFlash will have to move the ENTIRE distance 29 times in 0.0002% of a second, or 2 microseconds. For further reference, that's 0.002 milliseconds. That is the TOTAL time to make 29 trips. Let's say the two "illusions" are fairly close - 1m apart. If both "illusions held their hands outstretched, they would be touching or even overlapping.



(29 * 1m) / 0.002ms = ???



UberFlash has to be moving at about 14 500 m/s or 52 200 km/h. UberFlash can run a marathon in just under 3 seconds.



Mach 1 speed (speed of sound) is about 1 235 km/h and going over it produces a sonic boom. UberFlash would be moving at roughly 42 times that speed. I don't think it would be very subtle or very safe for...anybody and anything.



Running to each spot 10 times



But perhaps 30FPS is too high. The "illusions" don't need to be perfect. Let's cut it down to 10 FPS - it will produce noticeable flickering of the images. Let's also make the distance smaller - 50cm, the two are almost shoulder to shoulder. Oh, and let's give UberFlash a bit more leniency - instead of 0.002 milliseconds, let's make it few orders of magnitude more and give him 1 millisecond. Just 1/1000th of a second to travel between the two locations.



(9*0.5m) / 1ms = ???



That means that UberFlash will move at 4 500 m/s or 16 200 km/h. Still more than 10 times the sonic boom speeds.



I think at these speeds, aside from the images of UberFlash, there would be some high winds, loud noises, and maybe even flames around.







share|improve this answer















share|improve this answer




share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 7 hours ago

























answered 7 hours ago









VLAZVLAZ

1,2221 gold badge7 silver badges21 bronze badges




1,2221 gold badge7 silver badges21 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    Mach 10 at sea level will cause enough aerodynamic heating to incinerate pretty much everything. The Sprint missile needed a super aerodynamic shape with no control fins and an ablative heat shield and generated a plasma sheath.
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Oh, and also consider the bone-liquifying accelerations required to reach mach 10 in under a millisecond and slow down to a stop in less than a millisecond afterwards.
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @StarfishPrime I guess any onlookers would be too busy being dead to notice that the illusions are not perfect.
    $endgroup$
    – VLAZ
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I don't think it would be fatal... extremely unpleasant and probably resulting in permanent deafness, if you were close enough. You probably wouldn't have to be too far away to avoid that, too. It would rather spoil the illusion though.
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Uberflash says, "Stand further back! I promise, this is cool... at a distance!"
    $endgroup$
    – SRM
    3 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Mach 10 at sea level will cause enough aerodynamic heating to incinerate pretty much everything. The Sprint missile needed a super aerodynamic shape with no control fins and an ablative heat shield and generated a plasma sheath.
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Oh, and also consider the bone-liquifying accelerations required to reach mach 10 in under a millisecond and slow down to a stop in less than a millisecond afterwards.
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @StarfishPrime I guess any onlookers would be too busy being dead to notice that the illusions are not perfect.
    $endgroup$
    – VLAZ
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I don't think it would be fatal... extremely unpleasant and probably resulting in permanent deafness, if you were close enough. You probably wouldn't have to be too far away to avoid that, too. It would rather spoil the illusion though.
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Uberflash says, "Stand further back! I promise, this is cool... at a distance!"
    $endgroup$
    – SRM
    3 hours ago















$begingroup$
Mach 10 at sea level will cause enough aerodynamic heating to incinerate pretty much everything. The Sprint missile needed a super aerodynamic shape with no control fins and an ablative heat shield and generated a plasma sheath.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
Mach 10 at sea level will cause enough aerodynamic heating to incinerate pretty much everything. The Sprint missile needed a super aerodynamic shape with no control fins and an ablative heat shield and generated a plasma sheath.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
7 hours ago












$begingroup$
Oh, and also consider the bone-liquifying accelerations required to reach mach 10 in under a millisecond and slow down to a stop in less than a millisecond afterwards.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
Oh, and also consider the bone-liquifying accelerations required to reach mach 10 in under a millisecond and slow down to a stop in less than a millisecond afterwards.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
7 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@StarfishPrime I guess any onlookers would be too busy being dead to notice that the illusions are not perfect.
$endgroup$
– VLAZ
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
@StarfishPrime I guess any onlookers would be too busy being dead to notice that the illusions are not perfect.
$endgroup$
– VLAZ
7 hours ago












$begingroup$
I don't think it would be fatal... extremely unpleasant and probably resulting in permanent deafness, if you were close enough. You probably wouldn't have to be too far away to avoid that, too. It would rather spoil the illusion though.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
I don't think it would be fatal... extremely unpleasant and probably resulting in permanent deafness, if you were close enough. You probably wouldn't have to be too far away to avoid that, too. It would rather spoil the illusion though.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
7 hours ago












$begingroup$
Uberflash says, "Stand further back! I promise, this is cool... at a distance!"
$endgroup$
– SRM
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
Uberflash says, "Stand further back! I promise, this is cool... at a distance!"
$endgroup$
– SRM
3 hours ago













0
















$begingroup$

As long as you are above 60 frames (transitions from one location to the other) per second, most humans will see two people. This is how films work. At 120 FPS, it’ll be indistinguishable from two people standing there to all biological observers and most cameras.



Note that the continuous peals of thunder as you shift back and forth may give you away. :-) Also will have problem in fog — a clear channel between your two positions will open.






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$










  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Human eyes don’t actually have a ‘frame rate’ like film. It’s a handy lie, but it’s nowhere near as simple as FPS, so I’m not sure this wouldn’t just cause a blur that’s oddly solid at either end.
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Bloggs
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm pretty sure some people will notice the two shapes "flickering". Maybe not all but people can and do notice frame transitions. Also, this requires moving between the two locations in such high speed that you'll even give The Flash a run for his money.
    $endgroup$
    – VLAZ
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    That's not how human perception works, that's not how light works. It is how cameras work, so your answer would be fine for security cameras. But that wasn't really OPs question.
    $endgroup$
    – kleer001
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Much research has been done on this... the flicker fusion threshold is about 60hz but fast eye movements can result in much higher frequency flickering becoming apparent, even up as high as 500hz.
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    7 hours ago















0
















$begingroup$

As long as you are above 60 frames (transitions from one location to the other) per second, most humans will see two people. This is how films work. At 120 FPS, it’ll be indistinguishable from two people standing there to all biological observers and most cameras.



Note that the continuous peals of thunder as you shift back and forth may give you away. :-) Also will have problem in fog — a clear channel between your two positions will open.






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$










  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Human eyes don’t actually have a ‘frame rate’ like film. It’s a handy lie, but it’s nowhere near as simple as FPS, so I’m not sure this wouldn’t just cause a blur that’s oddly solid at either end.
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Bloggs
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm pretty sure some people will notice the two shapes "flickering". Maybe not all but people can and do notice frame transitions. Also, this requires moving between the two locations in such high speed that you'll even give The Flash a run for his money.
    $endgroup$
    – VLAZ
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    That's not how human perception works, that's not how light works. It is how cameras work, so your answer would be fine for security cameras. But that wasn't really OPs question.
    $endgroup$
    – kleer001
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Much research has been done on this... the flicker fusion threshold is about 60hz but fast eye movements can result in much higher frequency flickering becoming apparent, even up as high as 500hz.
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    7 hours ago













0














0










0







$begingroup$

As long as you are above 60 frames (transitions from one location to the other) per second, most humans will see two people. This is how films work. At 120 FPS, it’ll be indistinguishable from two people standing there to all biological observers and most cameras.



Note that the continuous peals of thunder as you shift back and forth may give you away. :-) Also will have problem in fog — a clear channel between your two positions will open.






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$



As long as you are above 60 frames (transitions from one location to the other) per second, most humans will see two people. This is how films work. At 120 FPS, it’ll be indistinguishable from two people standing there to all biological observers and most cameras.



Note that the continuous peals of thunder as you shift back and forth may give you away. :-) Also will have problem in fog — a clear channel between your two positions will open.







share|improve this answer













share|improve this answer




share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 8 hours ago









SRMSRM

17.9k4 gold badges32 silver badges81 bronze badges




17.9k4 gold badges32 silver badges81 bronze badges










  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Human eyes don’t actually have a ‘frame rate’ like film. It’s a handy lie, but it’s nowhere near as simple as FPS, so I’m not sure this wouldn’t just cause a blur that’s oddly solid at either end.
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Bloggs
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm pretty sure some people will notice the two shapes "flickering". Maybe not all but people can and do notice frame transitions. Also, this requires moving between the two locations in such high speed that you'll even give The Flash a run for his money.
    $endgroup$
    – VLAZ
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    That's not how human perception works, that's not how light works. It is how cameras work, so your answer would be fine for security cameras. But that wasn't really OPs question.
    $endgroup$
    – kleer001
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Much research has been done on this... the flicker fusion threshold is about 60hz but fast eye movements can result in much higher frequency flickering becoming apparent, even up as high as 500hz.
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    7 hours ago












  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Human eyes don’t actually have a ‘frame rate’ like film. It’s a handy lie, but it’s nowhere near as simple as FPS, so I’m not sure this wouldn’t just cause a blur that’s oddly solid at either end.
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Bloggs
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm pretty sure some people will notice the two shapes "flickering". Maybe not all but people can and do notice frame transitions. Also, this requires moving between the two locations in such high speed that you'll even give The Flash a run for his money.
    $endgroup$
    – VLAZ
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    That's not how human perception works, that's not how light works. It is how cameras work, so your answer would be fine for security cameras. But that wasn't really OPs question.
    $endgroup$
    – kleer001
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Much research has been done on this... the flicker fusion threshold is about 60hz but fast eye movements can result in much higher frequency flickering becoming apparent, even up as high as 500hz.
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    7 hours ago







4




4




$begingroup$
Human eyes don’t actually have a ‘frame rate’ like film. It’s a handy lie, but it’s nowhere near as simple as FPS, so I’m not sure this wouldn’t just cause a blur that’s oddly solid at either end.
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
Human eyes don’t actually have a ‘frame rate’ like film. It’s a handy lie, but it’s nowhere near as simple as FPS, so I’m not sure this wouldn’t just cause a blur that’s oddly solid at either end.
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
8 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
I'm pretty sure some people will notice the two shapes "flickering". Maybe not all but people can and do notice frame transitions. Also, this requires moving between the two locations in such high speed that you'll even give The Flash a run for his money.
$endgroup$
– VLAZ
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
I'm pretty sure some people will notice the two shapes "flickering". Maybe not all but people can and do notice frame transitions. Also, this requires moving between the two locations in such high speed that you'll even give The Flash a run for his money.
$endgroup$
– VLAZ
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
That's not how human perception works, that's not how light works. It is how cameras work, so your answer would be fine for security cameras. But that wasn't really OPs question.
$endgroup$
– kleer001
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
That's not how human perception works, that's not how light works. It is how cameras work, so your answer would be fine for security cameras. But that wasn't really OPs question.
$endgroup$
– kleer001
7 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Much research has been done on this... the flicker fusion threshold is about 60hz but fast eye movements can result in much higher frequency flickering becoming apparent, even up as high as 500hz.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
Much research has been done on this... the flicker fusion threshold is about 60hz but fast eye movements can result in much higher frequency flickering becoming apparent, even up as high as 500hz.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
7 hours ago


















draft saved

draft discarded















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f157834%2fcan-superspeed-cause-illusions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown









Popular posts from this blog

Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

Tom Holland Mục lục Đầu đời và giáo dục | Sự nghiệp | Cuộc sống cá nhân | Phim tham gia | Giải thưởng và đề cử | Chú thích | Liên kết ngoài | Trình đơn chuyển hướngProfile“Person Details for Thomas Stanley Holland, "England and Wales Birth Registration Index, 1837-2008" — FamilySearch.org”"Meet Tom Holland... the 16-year-old star of The Impossible""Schoolboy actor Tom Holland finds himself in Oscar contention for role in tsunami drama"“Naomi Watts on the Prince William and Harry's reaction to her film about the late Princess Diana”lưu trữ"Holland and Pflueger Are West End's Two New 'Billy Elliots'""I'm so envious of my son, the movie star! British writer Dominic Holland's spent 20 years trying to crack Hollywood - but he's been beaten to it by a very unlikely rival"“Richard and Margaret Povey of Jersey, Channel Islands, UK: Information about Thomas Stanley Holland”"Tom Holland to play Billy Elliot""New Billy Elliot leaving the garage"Billy Elliot the Musical - Tom Holland - Billy"A Tale of four Billys: Tom Holland""The Feel Good Factor""Thames Christian College schoolboys join Myleene Klass for The Feelgood Factor""Government launches £600,000 arts bursaries pilot""BILLY's Chapman, Holland, Gardner & Jackson-Keen Visit Prime Minister""Elton John 'blown away' by Billy Elliot fifth birthday" (video with John's interview and fragments of Holland's performance)"First News interviews Arrietty's Tom Holland"“33rd Critics' Circle Film Awards winners”“National Board of Review Current Awards”Bản gốc"Ron Howard Whaling Tale 'In The Heart Of The Sea' Casts Tom Holland"“'Spider-Man' Finds Tom Holland to Star as New Web-Slinger”lưu trữ“Captain America: Civil War (2016)”“Film Review: ‘Captain America: Civil War’”lưu trữ“‘Captain America: Civil War’ review: Choose your own avenger”lưu trữ“The Lost City of Z reviews”“Sony Pictures and Marvel Studios Find Their 'Spider-Man' Star and Director”“‘Mary Magdalene’, ‘Current War’ & ‘Wind River’ Get 2017 Release Dates From Weinstein”“Lionsgate Unleashing Daisy Ridley & Tom Holland Starrer ‘Chaos Walking’ In Cannes”“PTA's 'Master' Leads Chicago Film Critics Nominations, UPDATED: Houston and Indiana Critics Nominations”“Nominaciones Goya 2013 Telecinco Cinema – ENG”“Jameson Empire Film Awards: Martin Freeman wins best actor for performance in The Hobbit”“34th Annual Young Artist Awards”Bản gốc“Teen Choice Awards 2016—Captain America: Civil War Leads Second Wave of Nominations”“BAFTA Film Award Nominations: ‘La La Land’ Leads Race”“Saturn Awards Nominations 2017: 'Rogue One,' 'Walking Dead' Lead”Tom HollandTom HollandTom HollandTom Hollandmedia.gettyimages.comWorldCat Identities300279794no20130442900000 0004 0355 42791085670554170004732cb16706349t(data)XX5557367