Is it standard/normal to request details of illness on a return to work form (sick leave) (UK)? Should I provide the details?What are the risks if you are off work sick for too long?Process of taking a leave of absence due to severe anxietyHow to respond when my employer asks me why I'm taking so much sick leave

What is the design rationale for having armor and magic penetration mechanics?

Standard cumulative distribution function with optimization model variable

Will Schnorr Multi-signatures completely replace ECDSA?

Easy way of generating a 50-150W load @12V

How to give a rationality-inducing drug to an entire software company?

Is a list of the most common English words copyrightable?

What could possibly power an Alcubierre drive?

A fast aquatic predator with multiple eyes and pupils. Would these eyes be possible?

Does my protagonist need to be the most important character?

How can I turn on Adventure Sync?

Difference between commands `setminus` and `backslash`

Does really each and every single photon leave a dot on the screen in the bright area (double slit)?

Is it possible to have 2 ports open on SSH with 2 different authentication schemes?

Does an excessive table violate normalization rules?

Is there a historical explanation as to why the USA people are so litigious compared to France?

Front hydraulic disk brake is too powerful on MTB — solutions?

Is it possible to unmount a partition table?

Why do Computer Science degrees contain a high proportion of mathematics?

How can I prove mathematically the reflection matrix has only the eigenvalues 1 or -1?

'Pound' meaning in this context

Dice? = Is that so?

Why does Sonny say they call Michael "Giogali"?

What is the "Applicable country" field on the Icelandair check-in form?

Slaad Chaos Phage: Weak Combat Ability?



Is it standard/normal to request details of illness on a return to work form (sick leave) (UK)? Should I provide the details?


What are the risks if you are off work sick for too long?Process of taking a leave of absence due to severe anxietyHow to respond when my employer asks me why I'm taking so much sick leave






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;









1

















So, I was recently off for two days due to flu, post weekend, and I'm now returning to work. I have to complete a self assessment form, and complete an interview with my line manager. This is the policy set for all instances of sick leave regardless of length or reason.



Upon reviewing the self assessment form I was somewhat set back by the questions:




This must be specific. For absence related to dependants or compassionate, details of the relationship should be provided. For absence related to illness words like ‘sick’ or ‘ill’ will not suffice.




Followed by




Did you receive medication from



  1. your doctor Yes [ ] No [ ]


  2. self prescribed from chemist Yes [ ] No [ ]



    Please give names/details of any medication being taken, prescribed
    or
    otherwise:





So, my question is... Is it common practice to request such granular level of detail such as medication for basic office work (software development) sick leave, and are you at liberty to provide it?



I can't fathom what they would even do with the medication information given we don't employ pharmacists.



Update:
Posting from UK, England.



Thanks










share|improve this question









New contributor



user2091374 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


















  • 4





    Depending upon your location asking for such information may be illegal. Please update the question to indicate a country for better results.

    – Steve
    13 hours ago











  • @Steve Updated.

    – user2091374
    13 hours ago











  • I recall these exact questions being on my self assessment form at my old company. They were brought in as the company was undergoing a take over by a much larger parent company, leading me to believe that it was part of the agreement in the take over

    – Bee
    12 hours ago






  • 2





    Somewhat off topic. I was just speaking to a colleague who was off for a short while with depression. He listed his medication. What shocked me with that is HR started giving their personal opinions on one of the medications stating "you shouldn't really be taking x as its addictive". That to me is crossing so many lines. They are not medical professionals and have absolutely no place questioning the practice of someone who is. It just leads me back to original question.. Given HR aren't medically qualified, for what use is listing medication?

    – user2091374
    12 hours ago






  • 1





    "and don't mind providing the requested information." Even then don't provide any information to make it easier for those who really don't want to make their illness public.

    – FooTheBar
    12 hours ago

















1

















So, I was recently off for two days due to flu, post weekend, and I'm now returning to work. I have to complete a self assessment form, and complete an interview with my line manager. This is the policy set for all instances of sick leave regardless of length or reason.



Upon reviewing the self assessment form I was somewhat set back by the questions:




This must be specific. For absence related to dependants or compassionate, details of the relationship should be provided. For absence related to illness words like ‘sick’ or ‘ill’ will not suffice.




Followed by




Did you receive medication from



  1. your doctor Yes [ ] No [ ]


  2. self prescribed from chemist Yes [ ] No [ ]



    Please give names/details of any medication being taken, prescribed
    or
    otherwise:





So, my question is... Is it common practice to request such granular level of detail such as medication for basic office work (software development) sick leave, and are you at liberty to provide it?



I can't fathom what they would even do with the medication information given we don't employ pharmacists.



Update:
Posting from UK, England.



Thanks










share|improve this question









New contributor



user2091374 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


















  • 4





    Depending upon your location asking for such information may be illegal. Please update the question to indicate a country for better results.

    – Steve
    13 hours ago











  • @Steve Updated.

    – user2091374
    13 hours ago











  • I recall these exact questions being on my self assessment form at my old company. They were brought in as the company was undergoing a take over by a much larger parent company, leading me to believe that it was part of the agreement in the take over

    – Bee
    12 hours ago






  • 2





    Somewhat off topic. I was just speaking to a colleague who was off for a short while with depression. He listed his medication. What shocked me with that is HR started giving their personal opinions on one of the medications stating "you shouldn't really be taking x as its addictive". That to me is crossing so many lines. They are not medical professionals and have absolutely no place questioning the practice of someone who is. It just leads me back to original question.. Given HR aren't medically qualified, for what use is listing medication?

    – user2091374
    12 hours ago






  • 1





    "and don't mind providing the requested information." Even then don't provide any information to make it easier for those who really don't want to make their illness public.

    – FooTheBar
    12 hours ago













1












1








1








So, I was recently off for two days due to flu, post weekend, and I'm now returning to work. I have to complete a self assessment form, and complete an interview with my line manager. This is the policy set for all instances of sick leave regardless of length or reason.



Upon reviewing the self assessment form I was somewhat set back by the questions:




This must be specific. For absence related to dependants or compassionate, details of the relationship should be provided. For absence related to illness words like ‘sick’ or ‘ill’ will not suffice.




Followed by




Did you receive medication from



  1. your doctor Yes [ ] No [ ]


  2. self prescribed from chemist Yes [ ] No [ ]



    Please give names/details of any medication being taken, prescribed
    or
    otherwise:





So, my question is... Is it common practice to request such granular level of detail such as medication for basic office work (software development) sick leave, and are you at liberty to provide it?



I can't fathom what they would even do with the medication information given we don't employ pharmacists.



Update:
Posting from UK, England.



Thanks










share|improve this question









New contributor



user2091374 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











So, I was recently off for two days due to flu, post weekend, and I'm now returning to work. I have to complete a self assessment form, and complete an interview with my line manager. This is the policy set for all instances of sick leave regardless of length or reason.



Upon reviewing the self assessment form I was somewhat set back by the questions:




This must be specific. For absence related to dependants or compassionate, details of the relationship should be provided. For absence related to illness words like ‘sick’ or ‘ill’ will not suffice.




Followed by




Did you receive medication from



  1. your doctor Yes [ ] No [ ]


  2. self prescribed from chemist Yes [ ] No [ ]



    Please give names/details of any medication being taken, prescribed
    or
    otherwise:





So, my question is... Is it common practice to request such granular level of detail such as medication for basic office work (software development) sick leave, and are you at liberty to provide it?



I can't fathom what they would even do with the medication information given we don't employ pharmacists.



Update:
Posting from UK, England.



Thanks







united-kingdom leave-of-absence






share|improve this question









New contributor



user2091374 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



user2091374 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question



share|improve this question








edited 9 mins ago









seventyeightist

5343 silver badges10 bronze badges




5343 silver badges10 bronze badges






New contributor



user2091374 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 13 hours ago









user2091374user2091374

113 bronze badges




113 bronze badges




New contributor



user2091374 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




user2091374 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • 4





    Depending upon your location asking for such information may be illegal. Please update the question to indicate a country for better results.

    – Steve
    13 hours ago











  • @Steve Updated.

    – user2091374
    13 hours ago











  • I recall these exact questions being on my self assessment form at my old company. They were brought in as the company was undergoing a take over by a much larger parent company, leading me to believe that it was part of the agreement in the take over

    – Bee
    12 hours ago






  • 2





    Somewhat off topic. I was just speaking to a colleague who was off for a short while with depression. He listed his medication. What shocked me with that is HR started giving their personal opinions on one of the medications stating "you shouldn't really be taking x as its addictive". That to me is crossing so many lines. They are not medical professionals and have absolutely no place questioning the practice of someone who is. It just leads me back to original question.. Given HR aren't medically qualified, for what use is listing medication?

    – user2091374
    12 hours ago






  • 1





    "and don't mind providing the requested information." Even then don't provide any information to make it easier for those who really don't want to make their illness public.

    – FooTheBar
    12 hours ago












  • 4





    Depending upon your location asking for such information may be illegal. Please update the question to indicate a country for better results.

    – Steve
    13 hours ago











  • @Steve Updated.

    – user2091374
    13 hours ago











  • I recall these exact questions being on my self assessment form at my old company. They were brought in as the company was undergoing a take over by a much larger parent company, leading me to believe that it was part of the agreement in the take over

    – Bee
    12 hours ago






  • 2





    Somewhat off topic. I was just speaking to a colleague who was off for a short while with depression. He listed his medication. What shocked me with that is HR started giving their personal opinions on one of the medications stating "you shouldn't really be taking x as its addictive". That to me is crossing so many lines. They are not medical professionals and have absolutely no place questioning the practice of someone who is. It just leads me back to original question.. Given HR aren't medically qualified, for what use is listing medication?

    – user2091374
    12 hours ago






  • 1





    "and don't mind providing the requested information." Even then don't provide any information to make it easier for those who really don't want to make their illness public.

    – FooTheBar
    12 hours ago







4




4





Depending upon your location asking for such information may be illegal. Please update the question to indicate a country for better results.

– Steve
13 hours ago





Depending upon your location asking for such information may be illegal. Please update the question to indicate a country for better results.

– Steve
13 hours ago













@Steve Updated.

– user2091374
13 hours ago





@Steve Updated.

– user2091374
13 hours ago













I recall these exact questions being on my self assessment form at my old company. They were brought in as the company was undergoing a take over by a much larger parent company, leading me to believe that it was part of the agreement in the take over

– Bee
12 hours ago





I recall these exact questions being on my self assessment form at my old company. They were brought in as the company was undergoing a take over by a much larger parent company, leading me to believe that it was part of the agreement in the take over

– Bee
12 hours ago




2




2





Somewhat off topic. I was just speaking to a colleague who was off for a short while with depression. He listed his medication. What shocked me with that is HR started giving their personal opinions on one of the medications stating "you shouldn't really be taking x as its addictive". That to me is crossing so many lines. They are not medical professionals and have absolutely no place questioning the practice of someone who is. It just leads me back to original question.. Given HR aren't medically qualified, for what use is listing medication?

– user2091374
12 hours ago





Somewhat off topic. I was just speaking to a colleague who was off for a short while with depression. He listed his medication. What shocked me with that is HR started giving their personal opinions on one of the medications stating "you shouldn't really be taking x as its addictive". That to me is crossing so many lines. They are not medical professionals and have absolutely no place questioning the practice of someone who is. It just leads me back to original question.. Given HR aren't medically qualified, for what use is listing medication?

– user2091374
12 hours ago




1




1





"and don't mind providing the requested information." Even then don't provide any information to make it easier for those who really don't want to make their illness public.

– FooTheBar
12 hours ago





"and don't mind providing the requested information." Even then don't provide any information to make it easier for those who really don't want to make their illness public.

– FooTheBar
12 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5


















They can ask but you don't have to answer - as your absence was less than 7 calendar days simply stating that you were not well enough to work is sufficient.



To quote acas:




If a worker is absent due to sickness for seven days or less they can self-certify their absence. This means the worker informs their employer that they are not well enough to work and do not need to provide any further medical evidence.




(emphasis mine).



That said there are circumstances where the granular detail of medications you describe is appropriate - e.g. where your role includes driving or operating Forklifts or other heavy machinery. Basic office work? Not so much - it's going to be very difficult for any employer to prove it's reasonable to know what you were/are taking, and the same goes for symptoms - they are only pertinent when it could affect your ability to perform the role or the safety of yourself or others at work. Even then it's not a right for them to know this information, at worst they can seek a Fit Note from the doctor.



The text of the form is likely a boiler plate one designed to cover all scenarios rather than specific to you or this employer.



Is this a hill worth dying on in this particular case? That's going to have to be your call - personally for something this trivial I would probably just answer rather than get into it.






share|improve this answer


























  • Thanks for your answer. "Is this a hill worth dying on in this particular case?" No. And I'm fine providing the information. I'm just curious as to how common a practice this is, and if I'm at liberty to provide the information.

    – user2091374
    12 hours ago






  • 1





    "Is this a hill worth dying on in this particular case?" Maybe not for you. But by providing this information you make it harder for those who really do not want to make their illness public.

    – FooTheBar
    12 hours ago


















4


















A Return to Work procedure is standard and common place, but listing the provided medications is odd - but not illegal or unethical.



If you're on medication that can possibly affect your performance, such as pain killers, you can use this form to pre-emptively cover yourself by informing your HR department.



BUT



This information falls under the Data Protection Act and is sensitive information, and should only been viewed or accessed under proper circumstances. Posting this information on an intranet site or otherwise without prior consent is in direct violation of said act.






share|improve this answer


























  • "but not illegal or unethical" Asking for it with this pressure "This must be specific." is at least unethical and likely also illegal.

    – FooTheBar
    12 hours ago






  • 5





    @FooTheBar no this is the standard boilerplate text used in the UK = its the exact wording my company does I just summarise the symptoms eg vomiting, dhioreha or what have you

    – Neuromancer
    12 hours ago












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "423"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);







user2091374 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded
















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f146126%2fis-it-standard-normal-to-request-details-of-illness-on-a-return-to-work-form-si%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown


























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5


















They can ask but you don't have to answer - as your absence was less than 7 calendar days simply stating that you were not well enough to work is sufficient.



To quote acas:




If a worker is absent due to sickness for seven days or less they can self-certify their absence. This means the worker informs their employer that they are not well enough to work and do not need to provide any further medical evidence.




(emphasis mine).



That said there are circumstances where the granular detail of medications you describe is appropriate - e.g. where your role includes driving or operating Forklifts or other heavy machinery. Basic office work? Not so much - it's going to be very difficult for any employer to prove it's reasonable to know what you were/are taking, and the same goes for symptoms - they are only pertinent when it could affect your ability to perform the role or the safety of yourself or others at work. Even then it's not a right for them to know this information, at worst they can seek a Fit Note from the doctor.



The text of the form is likely a boiler plate one designed to cover all scenarios rather than specific to you or this employer.



Is this a hill worth dying on in this particular case? That's going to have to be your call - personally for something this trivial I would probably just answer rather than get into it.






share|improve this answer


























  • Thanks for your answer. "Is this a hill worth dying on in this particular case?" No. And I'm fine providing the information. I'm just curious as to how common a practice this is, and if I'm at liberty to provide the information.

    – user2091374
    12 hours ago






  • 1





    "Is this a hill worth dying on in this particular case?" Maybe not for you. But by providing this information you make it harder for those who really do not want to make their illness public.

    – FooTheBar
    12 hours ago















5


















They can ask but you don't have to answer - as your absence was less than 7 calendar days simply stating that you were not well enough to work is sufficient.



To quote acas:




If a worker is absent due to sickness for seven days or less they can self-certify their absence. This means the worker informs their employer that they are not well enough to work and do not need to provide any further medical evidence.




(emphasis mine).



That said there are circumstances where the granular detail of medications you describe is appropriate - e.g. where your role includes driving or operating Forklifts or other heavy machinery. Basic office work? Not so much - it's going to be very difficult for any employer to prove it's reasonable to know what you were/are taking, and the same goes for symptoms - they are only pertinent when it could affect your ability to perform the role or the safety of yourself or others at work. Even then it's not a right for them to know this information, at worst they can seek a Fit Note from the doctor.



The text of the form is likely a boiler plate one designed to cover all scenarios rather than specific to you or this employer.



Is this a hill worth dying on in this particular case? That's going to have to be your call - personally for something this trivial I would probably just answer rather than get into it.






share|improve this answer


























  • Thanks for your answer. "Is this a hill worth dying on in this particular case?" No. And I'm fine providing the information. I'm just curious as to how common a practice this is, and if I'm at liberty to provide the information.

    – user2091374
    12 hours ago






  • 1





    "Is this a hill worth dying on in this particular case?" Maybe not for you. But by providing this information you make it harder for those who really do not want to make their illness public.

    – FooTheBar
    12 hours ago













5














5










5









They can ask but you don't have to answer - as your absence was less than 7 calendar days simply stating that you were not well enough to work is sufficient.



To quote acas:




If a worker is absent due to sickness for seven days or less they can self-certify their absence. This means the worker informs their employer that they are not well enough to work and do not need to provide any further medical evidence.




(emphasis mine).



That said there are circumstances where the granular detail of medications you describe is appropriate - e.g. where your role includes driving or operating Forklifts or other heavy machinery. Basic office work? Not so much - it's going to be very difficult for any employer to prove it's reasonable to know what you were/are taking, and the same goes for symptoms - they are only pertinent when it could affect your ability to perform the role or the safety of yourself or others at work. Even then it's not a right for them to know this information, at worst they can seek a Fit Note from the doctor.



The text of the form is likely a boiler plate one designed to cover all scenarios rather than specific to you or this employer.



Is this a hill worth dying on in this particular case? That's going to have to be your call - personally for something this trivial I would probably just answer rather than get into it.






share|improve this answer














They can ask but you don't have to answer - as your absence was less than 7 calendar days simply stating that you were not well enough to work is sufficient.



To quote acas:




If a worker is absent due to sickness for seven days or less they can self-certify their absence. This means the worker informs their employer that they are not well enough to work and do not need to provide any further medical evidence.




(emphasis mine).



That said there are circumstances where the granular detail of medications you describe is appropriate - e.g. where your role includes driving or operating Forklifts or other heavy machinery. Basic office work? Not so much - it's going to be very difficult for any employer to prove it's reasonable to know what you were/are taking, and the same goes for symptoms - they are only pertinent when it could affect your ability to perform the role or the safety of yourself or others at work. Even then it's not a right for them to know this information, at worst they can seek a Fit Note from the doctor.



The text of the form is likely a boiler plate one designed to cover all scenarios rather than specific to you or this employer.



Is this a hill worth dying on in this particular case? That's going to have to be your call - personally for something this trivial I would probably just answer rather than get into it.







share|improve this answer













share|improve this answer




share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 12 hours ago









motosubatsumotosubatsu

62.9k34 gold badges177 silver badges251 bronze badges




62.9k34 gold badges177 silver badges251 bronze badges















  • Thanks for your answer. "Is this a hill worth dying on in this particular case?" No. And I'm fine providing the information. I'm just curious as to how common a practice this is, and if I'm at liberty to provide the information.

    – user2091374
    12 hours ago






  • 1





    "Is this a hill worth dying on in this particular case?" Maybe not for you. But by providing this information you make it harder for those who really do not want to make their illness public.

    – FooTheBar
    12 hours ago

















  • Thanks for your answer. "Is this a hill worth dying on in this particular case?" No. And I'm fine providing the information. I'm just curious as to how common a practice this is, and if I'm at liberty to provide the information.

    – user2091374
    12 hours ago






  • 1





    "Is this a hill worth dying on in this particular case?" Maybe not for you. But by providing this information you make it harder for those who really do not want to make their illness public.

    – FooTheBar
    12 hours ago
















Thanks for your answer. "Is this a hill worth dying on in this particular case?" No. And I'm fine providing the information. I'm just curious as to how common a practice this is, and if I'm at liberty to provide the information.

– user2091374
12 hours ago





Thanks for your answer. "Is this a hill worth dying on in this particular case?" No. And I'm fine providing the information. I'm just curious as to how common a practice this is, and if I'm at liberty to provide the information.

– user2091374
12 hours ago




1




1





"Is this a hill worth dying on in this particular case?" Maybe not for you. But by providing this information you make it harder for those who really do not want to make their illness public.

– FooTheBar
12 hours ago





"Is this a hill worth dying on in this particular case?" Maybe not for you. But by providing this information you make it harder for those who really do not want to make their illness public.

– FooTheBar
12 hours ago













4


















A Return to Work procedure is standard and common place, but listing the provided medications is odd - but not illegal or unethical.



If you're on medication that can possibly affect your performance, such as pain killers, you can use this form to pre-emptively cover yourself by informing your HR department.



BUT



This information falls under the Data Protection Act and is sensitive information, and should only been viewed or accessed under proper circumstances. Posting this information on an intranet site or otherwise without prior consent is in direct violation of said act.






share|improve this answer


























  • "but not illegal or unethical" Asking for it with this pressure "This must be specific." is at least unethical and likely also illegal.

    – FooTheBar
    12 hours ago






  • 5





    @FooTheBar no this is the standard boilerplate text used in the UK = its the exact wording my company does I just summarise the symptoms eg vomiting, dhioreha or what have you

    – Neuromancer
    12 hours ago















4


















A Return to Work procedure is standard and common place, but listing the provided medications is odd - but not illegal or unethical.



If you're on medication that can possibly affect your performance, such as pain killers, you can use this form to pre-emptively cover yourself by informing your HR department.



BUT



This information falls under the Data Protection Act and is sensitive information, and should only been viewed or accessed under proper circumstances. Posting this information on an intranet site or otherwise without prior consent is in direct violation of said act.






share|improve this answer


























  • "but not illegal or unethical" Asking for it with this pressure "This must be specific." is at least unethical and likely also illegal.

    – FooTheBar
    12 hours ago






  • 5





    @FooTheBar no this is the standard boilerplate text used in the UK = its the exact wording my company does I just summarise the symptoms eg vomiting, dhioreha or what have you

    – Neuromancer
    12 hours ago













4














4










4









A Return to Work procedure is standard and common place, but listing the provided medications is odd - but not illegal or unethical.



If you're on medication that can possibly affect your performance, such as pain killers, you can use this form to pre-emptively cover yourself by informing your HR department.



BUT



This information falls under the Data Protection Act and is sensitive information, and should only been viewed or accessed under proper circumstances. Posting this information on an intranet site or otherwise without prior consent is in direct violation of said act.






share|improve this answer














A Return to Work procedure is standard and common place, but listing the provided medications is odd - but not illegal or unethical.



If you're on medication that can possibly affect your performance, such as pain killers, you can use this form to pre-emptively cover yourself by informing your HR department.



BUT



This information falls under the Data Protection Act and is sensitive information, and should only been viewed or accessed under proper circumstances. Posting this information on an intranet site or otherwise without prior consent is in direct violation of said act.







share|improve this answer













share|improve this answer




share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 12 hours ago









Jay GouldJay Gould

2,5292 gold badges7 silver badges16 bronze badges




2,5292 gold badges7 silver badges16 bronze badges















  • "but not illegal or unethical" Asking for it with this pressure "This must be specific." is at least unethical and likely also illegal.

    – FooTheBar
    12 hours ago






  • 5





    @FooTheBar no this is the standard boilerplate text used in the UK = its the exact wording my company does I just summarise the symptoms eg vomiting, dhioreha or what have you

    – Neuromancer
    12 hours ago

















  • "but not illegal or unethical" Asking for it with this pressure "This must be specific." is at least unethical and likely also illegal.

    – FooTheBar
    12 hours ago






  • 5





    @FooTheBar no this is the standard boilerplate text used in the UK = its the exact wording my company does I just summarise the symptoms eg vomiting, dhioreha or what have you

    – Neuromancer
    12 hours ago
















"but not illegal or unethical" Asking for it with this pressure "This must be specific." is at least unethical and likely also illegal.

– FooTheBar
12 hours ago





"but not illegal or unethical" Asking for it with this pressure "This must be specific." is at least unethical and likely also illegal.

– FooTheBar
12 hours ago




5




5





@FooTheBar no this is the standard boilerplate text used in the UK = its the exact wording my company does I just summarise the symptoms eg vomiting, dhioreha or what have you

– Neuromancer
12 hours ago





@FooTheBar no this is the standard boilerplate text used in the UK = its the exact wording my company does I just summarise the symptoms eg vomiting, dhioreha or what have you

– Neuromancer
12 hours ago











user2091374 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded

















user2091374 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












user2091374 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











user2091374 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to The Workplace Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f146126%2fis-it-standard-normal-to-request-details-of-illness-on-a-return-to-work-form-si%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown









Popular posts from this blog

Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

199年 目錄 大件事 到箇年出世嗰人 到箇年死嗰人 節慶、風俗習慣 導覽選單