The actual purview of Her Majesty The Queen's Perogative?What mechanisms exist to prevent “hard” Brexit?Is there a country in which the parliamentary majority issued a no confidence vote against its own government soon after being confirmed?What if the House of Commons votes no confidence in the Prime Minister?How long can a vote of no confidence against the prime minister be delayed or avoided?Would a Government who lose the confidence of the House really delay an election until after the event over which that confidence was lost transpires?How did Theresa May remain PM after her Brexit deal was rejected?Can Theresa May easily circumvent the Yvette Cooper bill?Do any countries use a codified version of the “matter of confidence” of (former) UK tradition?How could the PM prorogue Parliament without the Queen's consent?To what extent do precedents in Westminster systems apply in other countries that use it?

Pronouns when writing from the point of view of a robot

Differentiability of operator norm

Colleagues speaking another language and it impacts work

Validation and verification of mathematical models

Does the length of a password for Wi-Fi affect speed?

Should I self-publish my novella on Amazon or try my luck getting publishers?

How do these cubesats' whip antennas work?

What does VB stand for?

What city skyline is this picture of?

Was Richard I's imprisonment by Leopold of Austria justified?

Is there a difference between 「目を覚ます」 and 「目覚める」

How to halve redstone signal strength?

How do I get the =LEFT function in excel, to also take the number zero as the first number?

"In charge of" vs "Responsible for"

What can make Linux so unresponsive?

Who is the god Ao?

Does a 4 bladed prop have almost twice the thrust of a 2 bladed prop?

Can you use the Help action to give a 2019 UA Artillerist artificer's turret advantage?

What are the examples (applications) of the MIPs in which the objective function has nonzero coefficients for only continuous variables?

Is it a bad idea to offer variants of a final exam based on the type of allowed calculators?

Why is Chromosome 1 called Chromosome 1?

Is a switch from R to Python worth it?

Will a paper be retracted if a flaw in released software code invalidates its central idea?

Where in ש״ס who one find the adage, “He who suggests the idea should carry it out”?



The actual purview of Her Majesty The Queen's Perogative?


What mechanisms exist to prevent “hard” Brexit?Is there a country in which the parliamentary majority issued a no confidence vote against its own government soon after being confirmed?What if the House of Commons votes no confidence in the Prime Minister?How long can a vote of no confidence against the prime minister be delayed or avoided?Would a Government who lose the confidence of the House really delay an election until after the event over which that confidence was lost transpires?How did Theresa May remain PM after her Brexit deal was rejected?Can Theresa May easily circumvent the Yvette Cooper bill?Do any countries use a codified version of the “matter of confidence” of (former) UK tradition?How could the PM prorogue Parliament without the Queen's consent?To what extent do precedents in Westminster systems apply in other countries that use it?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








4















In keeping up to date on Brexit, Dominic Cummings, Special Advisor to Boris Johnson - UK Prime Minister - has stated that, in the event that a motion of no confidence has passed the House of Commons, Johnson could ignore a motion of no confidence, even if an alliance, holding the majority in the Commons, was formed:




Cummings is said to have told advisers that Johnson would ignore the result of the confidence vote and call a “people v politicians” general election – to be held after Britain had left the EU.




Reference



To my mind, the Fixed-term Parliaments Act of 2011 doesn't make provisions for a now defunct Ministry to pick a time a General Election is to be held without the express consent of the Commons. However, as stated be Cummings, the current Ministry intends to attempt to do just that while not recognizing the formation of a new Government, if a new Government had been formed:




Cummings, the former campaign director of Vote Leave, is understood to have told government advisers last week that Johnson could stay on as prime minister even if rebel Tory MPs were able to form a “government of national unity” opposed to a no-deal Brexit.




My interest is not in the legality of whether they could do such a thing, but, in the event Her Majesty is brought in to resolve the issue, what does Her Majesty's Prerogative allow in the such an event where the previous Ministry (the Ministry that lost the no confidence vote) ignores both the no confidence vote and the guidelines pursuant to the Fixed-terms Parliament Act while a formal alliance holding a majority in the Commons is presented to Her Majesty?



And second to that, does Her Majesty hold the power to order the Police, Army, or even the Grenadier guards to arrest the individuals making up the defunct Ministry in order to allow the new alliance to form a Government?










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    "The Queen has a veto. The Queen has at most one veto."

    – Martin Schröder
    8 hours ago











  • @MartinSchröder Would you elaborate on that, please?

    – Duke Jake Morgan
    8 hours ago











  • By the way, the Grenadier Guards are part of the army and function as a normal infantry regiment.

    – DJClayworth
    6 hours ago






  • 3





    @DukeJakeMorgan If the monarch actually used the veto to meddle in daily politics (like canceling A50), the UK would become a republic very fast.

    – Martin Schröder
    6 hours ago







  • 1





    @DJClayworth I know, however at least one company serves as a guard for Her Majesty. I was wondering whether Her Majesty would have the power to order the company guarding the Queen to arrest those making up the defunct Ministry if the Johnson Ministry and the Monarchy come head to head if a Johnson Ministry defied a no confidence vote.

    – Duke Jake Morgan
    6 hours ago


















4















In keeping up to date on Brexit, Dominic Cummings, Special Advisor to Boris Johnson - UK Prime Minister - has stated that, in the event that a motion of no confidence has passed the House of Commons, Johnson could ignore a motion of no confidence, even if an alliance, holding the majority in the Commons, was formed:




Cummings is said to have told advisers that Johnson would ignore the result of the confidence vote and call a “people v politicians” general election – to be held after Britain had left the EU.




Reference



To my mind, the Fixed-term Parliaments Act of 2011 doesn't make provisions for a now defunct Ministry to pick a time a General Election is to be held without the express consent of the Commons. However, as stated be Cummings, the current Ministry intends to attempt to do just that while not recognizing the formation of a new Government, if a new Government had been formed:




Cummings, the former campaign director of Vote Leave, is understood to have told government advisers last week that Johnson could stay on as prime minister even if rebel Tory MPs were able to form a “government of national unity” opposed to a no-deal Brexit.




My interest is not in the legality of whether they could do such a thing, but, in the event Her Majesty is brought in to resolve the issue, what does Her Majesty's Prerogative allow in the such an event where the previous Ministry (the Ministry that lost the no confidence vote) ignores both the no confidence vote and the guidelines pursuant to the Fixed-terms Parliament Act while a formal alliance holding a majority in the Commons is presented to Her Majesty?



And second to that, does Her Majesty hold the power to order the Police, Army, or even the Grenadier guards to arrest the individuals making up the defunct Ministry in order to allow the new alliance to form a Government?










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    "The Queen has a veto. The Queen has at most one veto."

    – Martin Schröder
    8 hours ago











  • @MartinSchröder Would you elaborate on that, please?

    – Duke Jake Morgan
    8 hours ago











  • By the way, the Grenadier Guards are part of the army and function as a normal infantry regiment.

    – DJClayworth
    6 hours ago






  • 3





    @DukeJakeMorgan If the monarch actually used the veto to meddle in daily politics (like canceling A50), the UK would become a republic very fast.

    – Martin Schröder
    6 hours ago







  • 1





    @DJClayworth I know, however at least one company serves as a guard for Her Majesty. I was wondering whether Her Majesty would have the power to order the company guarding the Queen to arrest those making up the defunct Ministry if the Johnson Ministry and the Monarchy come head to head if a Johnson Ministry defied a no confidence vote.

    – Duke Jake Morgan
    6 hours ago














4












4








4








In keeping up to date on Brexit, Dominic Cummings, Special Advisor to Boris Johnson - UK Prime Minister - has stated that, in the event that a motion of no confidence has passed the House of Commons, Johnson could ignore a motion of no confidence, even if an alliance, holding the majority in the Commons, was formed:




Cummings is said to have told advisers that Johnson would ignore the result of the confidence vote and call a “people v politicians” general election – to be held after Britain had left the EU.




Reference



To my mind, the Fixed-term Parliaments Act of 2011 doesn't make provisions for a now defunct Ministry to pick a time a General Election is to be held without the express consent of the Commons. However, as stated be Cummings, the current Ministry intends to attempt to do just that while not recognizing the formation of a new Government, if a new Government had been formed:




Cummings, the former campaign director of Vote Leave, is understood to have told government advisers last week that Johnson could stay on as prime minister even if rebel Tory MPs were able to form a “government of national unity” opposed to a no-deal Brexit.




My interest is not in the legality of whether they could do such a thing, but, in the event Her Majesty is brought in to resolve the issue, what does Her Majesty's Prerogative allow in the such an event where the previous Ministry (the Ministry that lost the no confidence vote) ignores both the no confidence vote and the guidelines pursuant to the Fixed-terms Parliament Act while a formal alliance holding a majority in the Commons is presented to Her Majesty?



And second to that, does Her Majesty hold the power to order the Police, Army, or even the Grenadier guards to arrest the individuals making up the defunct Ministry in order to allow the new alliance to form a Government?










share|improve this question














In keeping up to date on Brexit, Dominic Cummings, Special Advisor to Boris Johnson - UK Prime Minister - has stated that, in the event that a motion of no confidence has passed the House of Commons, Johnson could ignore a motion of no confidence, even if an alliance, holding the majority in the Commons, was formed:




Cummings is said to have told advisers that Johnson would ignore the result of the confidence vote and call a “people v politicians” general election – to be held after Britain had left the EU.




Reference



To my mind, the Fixed-term Parliaments Act of 2011 doesn't make provisions for a now defunct Ministry to pick a time a General Election is to be held without the express consent of the Commons. However, as stated be Cummings, the current Ministry intends to attempt to do just that while not recognizing the formation of a new Government, if a new Government had been formed:




Cummings, the former campaign director of Vote Leave, is understood to have told government advisers last week that Johnson could stay on as prime minister even if rebel Tory MPs were able to form a “government of national unity” opposed to a no-deal Brexit.




My interest is not in the legality of whether they could do such a thing, but, in the event Her Majesty is brought in to resolve the issue, what does Her Majesty's Prerogative allow in the such an event where the previous Ministry (the Ministry that lost the no confidence vote) ignores both the no confidence vote and the guidelines pursuant to the Fixed-terms Parliament Act while a formal alliance holding a majority in the Commons is presented to Her Majesty?



And second to that, does Her Majesty hold the power to order the Police, Army, or even the Grenadier guards to arrest the individuals making up the defunct Ministry in order to allow the new alliance to form a Government?







united-kingdom brexit government monarchy






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 9 hours ago









Duke Jake MorganDuke Jake Morgan

333 bronze badges




333 bronze badges










  • 1





    "The Queen has a veto. The Queen has at most one veto."

    – Martin Schröder
    8 hours ago











  • @MartinSchröder Would you elaborate on that, please?

    – Duke Jake Morgan
    8 hours ago











  • By the way, the Grenadier Guards are part of the army and function as a normal infantry regiment.

    – DJClayworth
    6 hours ago






  • 3





    @DukeJakeMorgan If the monarch actually used the veto to meddle in daily politics (like canceling A50), the UK would become a republic very fast.

    – Martin Schröder
    6 hours ago







  • 1





    @DJClayworth I know, however at least one company serves as a guard for Her Majesty. I was wondering whether Her Majesty would have the power to order the company guarding the Queen to arrest those making up the defunct Ministry if the Johnson Ministry and the Monarchy come head to head if a Johnson Ministry defied a no confidence vote.

    – Duke Jake Morgan
    6 hours ago













  • 1





    "The Queen has a veto. The Queen has at most one veto."

    – Martin Schröder
    8 hours ago











  • @MartinSchröder Would you elaborate on that, please?

    – Duke Jake Morgan
    8 hours ago











  • By the way, the Grenadier Guards are part of the army and function as a normal infantry regiment.

    – DJClayworth
    6 hours ago






  • 3





    @DukeJakeMorgan If the monarch actually used the veto to meddle in daily politics (like canceling A50), the UK would become a republic very fast.

    – Martin Schröder
    6 hours ago







  • 1





    @DJClayworth I know, however at least one company serves as a guard for Her Majesty. I was wondering whether Her Majesty would have the power to order the company guarding the Queen to arrest those making up the defunct Ministry if the Johnson Ministry and the Monarchy come head to head if a Johnson Ministry defied a no confidence vote.

    – Duke Jake Morgan
    6 hours ago








1




1





"The Queen has a veto. The Queen has at most one veto."

– Martin Schröder
8 hours ago





"The Queen has a veto. The Queen has at most one veto."

– Martin Schröder
8 hours ago













@MartinSchröder Would you elaborate on that, please?

– Duke Jake Morgan
8 hours ago





@MartinSchröder Would you elaborate on that, please?

– Duke Jake Morgan
8 hours ago













By the way, the Grenadier Guards are part of the army and function as a normal infantry regiment.

– DJClayworth
6 hours ago





By the way, the Grenadier Guards are part of the army and function as a normal infantry regiment.

– DJClayworth
6 hours ago




3




3





@DukeJakeMorgan If the monarch actually used the veto to meddle in daily politics (like canceling A50), the UK would become a republic very fast.

– Martin Schröder
6 hours ago






@DukeJakeMorgan If the monarch actually used the veto to meddle in daily politics (like canceling A50), the UK would become a republic very fast.

– Martin Schröder
6 hours ago





1




1





@DJClayworth I know, however at least one company serves as a guard for Her Majesty. I was wondering whether Her Majesty would have the power to order the company guarding the Queen to arrest those making up the defunct Ministry if the Johnson Ministry and the Monarchy come head to head if a Johnson Ministry defied a no confidence vote.

– Duke Jake Morgan
6 hours ago






@DJClayworth I know, however at least one company serves as a guard for Her Majesty. I was wondering whether Her Majesty would have the power to order the company guarding the Queen to arrest those making up the defunct Ministry if the Johnson Ministry and the Monarchy come head to head if a Johnson Ministry defied a no confidence vote.

– Duke Jake Morgan
6 hours ago











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5














Her Majesty is obliged to appoint as Prime Minister the person who she feels is most likely to command the confidence of the House of Commons.



If Boris Johnson loses a vote of no confidence (as set out under the Fixed Term Parliament Act), and another leader is able to convince Her Majesty that he is more likely to be able to get the confidence of the Commons within that two week period, then Her Majesty would be within her rights to sack Mr. Johnson and appoint this other person as Prime Minister. While the sacking of a Prime Minister has not been done in the UK (at least not in modern history), it was done in Australia in 1975, in what became known as The Dismissal.



After this two-week period, the election must be held, but as the Fixed Term Parliament Act does not specify precisely when said election must be held, it is up to Her Majesty on the advice of the Prime Minister. It would be expected that there would be a short wash-up period to get some essential business through (though said business would require support from the opposition), and then Parliament would get dissolved five weeks before the election.






share|improve this answer
































    4














    Her Majesty can appoint whomever as Prime Minister. By convention, that is on the recommendation of the outgoing PM, but the recommendation is not required.



    Having been appointed, the Prime Minister can organise their Cabinet however they desire, re-arrange the Civil Service, etc.



    Johnson barricading himself in Downing Street would be a futile gesture, (presumably) Corbyn could govern from some other building.






    share|improve this answer

























    • "Her Majesty can appoint whomever as Prime Minister". I'm confused on that, is there a reference you can give supporting that statement? As far as I know, not implying that I am right nor wrong, Her Majesty cannot appoint someone who isn't 1) retaining the majority in the House of Commons and 2) hasn't been presented as a credible candidacy for the Premiership?

      – Duke Jake Morgan
      8 hours ago






    • 1





      @DukeJakeMorgan She chooses to only appoint the leader of the party (or coalition) that has a commons majority

      – Caleth
      4 hours ago













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "475"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f43513%2fthe-actual-purview-of-her-majesty-the-queens-perogative%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5














    Her Majesty is obliged to appoint as Prime Minister the person who she feels is most likely to command the confidence of the House of Commons.



    If Boris Johnson loses a vote of no confidence (as set out under the Fixed Term Parliament Act), and another leader is able to convince Her Majesty that he is more likely to be able to get the confidence of the Commons within that two week period, then Her Majesty would be within her rights to sack Mr. Johnson and appoint this other person as Prime Minister. While the sacking of a Prime Minister has not been done in the UK (at least not in modern history), it was done in Australia in 1975, in what became known as The Dismissal.



    After this two-week period, the election must be held, but as the Fixed Term Parliament Act does not specify precisely when said election must be held, it is up to Her Majesty on the advice of the Prime Minister. It would be expected that there would be a short wash-up period to get some essential business through (though said business would require support from the opposition), and then Parliament would get dissolved five weeks before the election.






    share|improve this answer





























      5














      Her Majesty is obliged to appoint as Prime Minister the person who she feels is most likely to command the confidence of the House of Commons.



      If Boris Johnson loses a vote of no confidence (as set out under the Fixed Term Parliament Act), and another leader is able to convince Her Majesty that he is more likely to be able to get the confidence of the Commons within that two week period, then Her Majesty would be within her rights to sack Mr. Johnson and appoint this other person as Prime Minister. While the sacking of a Prime Minister has not been done in the UK (at least not in modern history), it was done in Australia in 1975, in what became known as The Dismissal.



      After this two-week period, the election must be held, but as the Fixed Term Parliament Act does not specify precisely when said election must be held, it is up to Her Majesty on the advice of the Prime Minister. It would be expected that there would be a short wash-up period to get some essential business through (though said business would require support from the opposition), and then Parliament would get dissolved five weeks before the election.






      share|improve this answer



























        5












        5








        5







        Her Majesty is obliged to appoint as Prime Minister the person who she feels is most likely to command the confidence of the House of Commons.



        If Boris Johnson loses a vote of no confidence (as set out under the Fixed Term Parliament Act), and another leader is able to convince Her Majesty that he is more likely to be able to get the confidence of the Commons within that two week period, then Her Majesty would be within her rights to sack Mr. Johnson and appoint this other person as Prime Minister. While the sacking of a Prime Minister has not been done in the UK (at least not in modern history), it was done in Australia in 1975, in what became known as The Dismissal.



        After this two-week period, the election must be held, but as the Fixed Term Parliament Act does not specify precisely when said election must be held, it is up to Her Majesty on the advice of the Prime Minister. It would be expected that there would be a short wash-up period to get some essential business through (though said business would require support from the opposition), and then Parliament would get dissolved five weeks before the election.






        share|improve this answer













        Her Majesty is obliged to appoint as Prime Minister the person who she feels is most likely to command the confidence of the House of Commons.



        If Boris Johnson loses a vote of no confidence (as set out under the Fixed Term Parliament Act), and another leader is able to convince Her Majesty that he is more likely to be able to get the confidence of the Commons within that two week period, then Her Majesty would be within her rights to sack Mr. Johnson and appoint this other person as Prime Minister. While the sacking of a Prime Minister has not been done in the UK (at least not in modern history), it was done in Australia in 1975, in what became known as The Dismissal.



        After this two-week period, the election must be held, but as the Fixed Term Parliament Act does not specify precisely when said election must be held, it is up to Her Majesty on the advice of the Prime Minister. It would be expected that there would be a short wash-up period to get some essential business through (though said business would require support from the opposition), and then Parliament would get dissolved five weeks before the election.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 7 hours ago









        Joe CJoe C

        5,89213 silver badges42 bronze badges




        5,89213 silver badges42 bronze badges


























            4














            Her Majesty can appoint whomever as Prime Minister. By convention, that is on the recommendation of the outgoing PM, but the recommendation is not required.



            Having been appointed, the Prime Minister can organise their Cabinet however they desire, re-arrange the Civil Service, etc.



            Johnson barricading himself in Downing Street would be a futile gesture, (presumably) Corbyn could govern from some other building.






            share|improve this answer

























            • "Her Majesty can appoint whomever as Prime Minister". I'm confused on that, is there a reference you can give supporting that statement? As far as I know, not implying that I am right nor wrong, Her Majesty cannot appoint someone who isn't 1) retaining the majority in the House of Commons and 2) hasn't been presented as a credible candidacy for the Premiership?

              – Duke Jake Morgan
              8 hours ago






            • 1





              @DukeJakeMorgan She chooses to only appoint the leader of the party (or coalition) that has a commons majority

              – Caleth
              4 hours ago















            4














            Her Majesty can appoint whomever as Prime Minister. By convention, that is on the recommendation of the outgoing PM, but the recommendation is not required.



            Having been appointed, the Prime Minister can organise their Cabinet however they desire, re-arrange the Civil Service, etc.



            Johnson barricading himself in Downing Street would be a futile gesture, (presumably) Corbyn could govern from some other building.






            share|improve this answer

























            • "Her Majesty can appoint whomever as Prime Minister". I'm confused on that, is there a reference you can give supporting that statement? As far as I know, not implying that I am right nor wrong, Her Majesty cannot appoint someone who isn't 1) retaining the majority in the House of Commons and 2) hasn't been presented as a credible candidacy for the Premiership?

              – Duke Jake Morgan
              8 hours ago






            • 1





              @DukeJakeMorgan She chooses to only appoint the leader of the party (or coalition) that has a commons majority

              – Caleth
              4 hours ago













            4












            4








            4







            Her Majesty can appoint whomever as Prime Minister. By convention, that is on the recommendation of the outgoing PM, but the recommendation is not required.



            Having been appointed, the Prime Minister can organise their Cabinet however they desire, re-arrange the Civil Service, etc.



            Johnson barricading himself in Downing Street would be a futile gesture, (presumably) Corbyn could govern from some other building.






            share|improve this answer













            Her Majesty can appoint whomever as Prime Minister. By convention, that is on the recommendation of the outgoing PM, but the recommendation is not required.



            Having been appointed, the Prime Minister can organise their Cabinet however they desire, re-arrange the Civil Service, etc.



            Johnson barricading himself in Downing Street would be a futile gesture, (presumably) Corbyn could govern from some other building.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 9 hours ago









            CalethCaleth

            1,2226 silver badges12 bronze badges




            1,2226 silver badges12 bronze badges















            • "Her Majesty can appoint whomever as Prime Minister". I'm confused on that, is there a reference you can give supporting that statement? As far as I know, not implying that I am right nor wrong, Her Majesty cannot appoint someone who isn't 1) retaining the majority in the House of Commons and 2) hasn't been presented as a credible candidacy for the Premiership?

              – Duke Jake Morgan
              8 hours ago






            • 1





              @DukeJakeMorgan She chooses to only appoint the leader of the party (or coalition) that has a commons majority

              – Caleth
              4 hours ago

















            • "Her Majesty can appoint whomever as Prime Minister". I'm confused on that, is there a reference you can give supporting that statement? As far as I know, not implying that I am right nor wrong, Her Majesty cannot appoint someone who isn't 1) retaining the majority in the House of Commons and 2) hasn't been presented as a credible candidacy for the Premiership?

              – Duke Jake Morgan
              8 hours ago






            • 1





              @DukeJakeMorgan She chooses to only appoint the leader of the party (or coalition) that has a commons majority

              – Caleth
              4 hours ago
















            "Her Majesty can appoint whomever as Prime Minister". I'm confused on that, is there a reference you can give supporting that statement? As far as I know, not implying that I am right nor wrong, Her Majesty cannot appoint someone who isn't 1) retaining the majority in the House of Commons and 2) hasn't been presented as a credible candidacy for the Premiership?

            – Duke Jake Morgan
            8 hours ago





            "Her Majesty can appoint whomever as Prime Minister". I'm confused on that, is there a reference you can give supporting that statement? As far as I know, not implying that I am right nor wrong, Her Majesty cannot appoint someone who isn't 1) retaining the majority in the House of Commons and 2) hasn't been presented as a credible candidacy for the Premiership?

            – Duke Jake Morgan
            8 hours ago




            1




            1





            @DukeJakeMorgan She chooses to only appoint the leader of the party (or coalition) that has a commons majority

            – Caleth
            4 hours ago





            @DukeJakeMorgan She chooses to only appoint the leader of the party (or coalition) that has a commons majority

            – Caleth
            4 hours ago

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Politics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f43513%2fthe-actual-purview-of-her-majesty-the-queens-perogative%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її