Prove your innocenceA double-agent with a conundrumMurderer, Car and ColourSeeking SidekicksThe harsh password changeFind your way to the control roomA Prison Officer's PasswordBirdies and Tigers and Bears, Oh My!What do chess and wordoku have to do with each other? - Clue Thirty-OneThe Evicted TenantDo I Work with an Orangutan?A strange hotel

Using `With[...]` with a list specification as a variable

In the MCU, why does Mjölnir retain its enchantments after Ragnarok?

Is it possible to get crispy, crunchy carrots from canned carrots?

Why do all fields in a QFT transform like *irreducible* representations of some group?

Science fiction short story where aliens contact a drunk about Earth's impending destruction

Why in most German places is the church the tallest building?

Did the British navy fail to take into account the ballistics correction due to Coriolis force during WW1 Falkland Islands battle?

Are there account age or level requirements for obtaining special research?

Earth rotation discrepancy

Confirming resignation after resignation letter ripped up

Can you feel passing through the sound barrier in an F-16?

What is this symbol: semicircles facing eachother

Most practical knots for hitching a line to an object while keeping the bitter end as tight as possible, without sag?

Cross-referencing enumerate item

If all stars rotate, why was there a theory developed, that requires non-rotating stars?

Does norwegian.no airline overbook flights?

Is there any way to keep a player from killing an NPC?

Why is less being run unnecessarily by git?

Mathematical uses of string theory

See details of old sessions

Prove your innocence

Non-visual Computers - thoughts?

What magic extends life or grants immortality?

Shouldn't the "credit score" prevent Americans from going deeper and deeper into personal debt?



Prove your innocence


A double-agent with a conundrumMurderer, Car and ColourSeeking SidekicksThe harsh password changeFind your way to the control roomA Prison Officer's PasswordBirdies and Tigers and Bears, Oh My!What do chess and wordoku have to do with each other? - Clue Thirty-OneThe Evicted TenantDo I Work with an Orangutan?A strange hotel






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








7












$begingroup$


Inspired by A double-agent with a conundrum. Everything is hypothetical and while the choice of countries are important, they serve no political purpose.



Tension between the US and China is rising. You are a senior officer working for the CIA, in charge of protecting secret technology from the hands of Chinese spies. You also appear in public often, making you the target of many hostile groups.



One day, there appeared a video, showing you conversing and divulging classified information to China's intelligence counterpart. Espionage, if charged, means maximum security prison for life. The problem? That was not you. You believed that the Chinese government hired a body double and faked the video from mainland China to frame you into espionage. You have to prove your innocence before it's too late, because the system will err on the side of guilt except there exist a "smoking gun" evidence.



You scrutinized the video. It started with the title "CIA senior officer at a secret meeting in Denver, August 2nd 2019." The video then cut to a likeness of you, sitting opposite a desk from two other Chinese senior ranking officers. The video seems to be captured by a hidden high quality camera. The faces were blurred in the video, but the voice sounded exactly like yours. The room was white, illuminated by bright florescence light. Besides the desk, chairs, and a clock on the wall, the room was bare. Nothing about the furniture could have told you anything about their origin. Your likeness was able to capture you quite well, copy your very mannerism and accent. He must have watched a lot of your interviews. He even wore everything that you have, down to the wrist watch. You know that everything talked about in the video are true, but the Chinese could have known that already from previous espionage attempts. The metadata was stripped bare, and no one knows who tipped the video in the first place. You also cannot unblur the face to show that it is actually not you.



Suddenly, you had an idea. You went back to your computer and used one last forensics trick...Bingo! The Chinese might tried very hard in hiding anything that revealed the video's actual location, but this showed that the video is recorded in China and not in America! Coupled with the fact that you never left America, you have found the smoking gun for you innocence!




What is your evidence?











share|improve this question









$endgroup$




















    7












    $begingroup$


    Inspired by A double-agent with a conundrum. Everything is hypothetical and while the choice of countries are important, they serve no political purpose.



    Tension between the US and China is rising. You are a senior officer working for the CIA, in charge of protecting secret technology from the hands of Chinese spies. You also appear in public often, making you the target of many hostile groups.



    One day, there appeared a video, showing you conversing and divulging classified information to China's intelligence counterpart. Espionage, if charged, means maximum security prison for life. The problem? That was not you. You believed that the Chinese government hired a body double and faked the video from mainland China to frame you into espionage. You have to prove your innocence before it's too late, because the system will err on the side of guilt except there exist a "smoking gun" evidence.



    You scrutinized the video. It started with the title "CIA senior officer at a secret meeting in Denver, August 2nd 2019." The video then cut to a likeness of you, sitting opposite a desk from two other Chinese senior ranking officers. The video seems to be captured by a hidden high quality camera. The faces were blurred in the video, but the voice sounded exactly like yours. The room was white, illuminated by bright florescence light. Besides the desk, chairs, and a clock on the wall, the room was bare. Nothing about the furniture could have told you anything about their origin. Your likeness was able to capture you quite well, copy your very mannerism and accent. He must have watched a lot of your interviews. He even wore everything that you have, down to the wrist watch. You know that everything talked about in the video are true, but the Chinese could have known that already from previous espionage attempts. The metadata was stripped bare, and no one knows who tipped the video in the first place. You also cannot unblur the face to show that it is actually not you.



    Suddenly, you had an idea. You went back to your computer and used one last forensics trick...Bingo! The Chinese might tried very hard in hiding anything that revealed the video's actual location, but this showed that the video is recorded in China and not in America! Coupled with the fact that you never left America, you have found the smoking gun for you innocence!




    What is your evidence?











    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$
















      7












      7








      7


      1



      $begingroup$


      Inspired by A double-agent with a conundrum. Everything is hypothetical and while the choice of countries are important, they serve no political purpose.



      Tension between the US and China is rising. You are a senior officer working for the CIA, in charge of protecting secret technology from the hands of Chinese spies. You also appear in public often, making you the target of many hostile groups.



      One day, there appeared a video, showing you conversing and divulging classified information to China's intelligence counterpart. Espionage, if charged, means maximum security prison for life. The problem? That was not you. You believed that the Chinese government hired a body double and faked the video from mainland China to frame you into espionage. You have to prove your innocence before it's too late, because the system will err on the side of guilt except there exist a "smoking gun" evidence.



      You scrutinized the video. It started with the title "CIA senior officer at a secret meeting in Denver, August 2nd 2019." The video then cut to a likeness of you, sitting opposite a desk from two other Chinese senior ranking officers. The video seems to be captured by a hidden high quality camera. The faces were blurred in the video, but the voice sounded exactly like yours. The room was white, illuminated by bright florescence light. Besides the desk, chairs, and a clock on the wall, the room was bare. Nothing about the furniture could have told you anything about their origin. Your likeness was able to capture you quite well, copy your very mannerism and accent. He must have watched a lot of your interviews. He even wore everything that you have, down to the wrist watch. You know that everything talked about in the video are true, but the Chinese could have known that already from previous espionage attempts. The metadata was stripped bare, and no one knows who tipped the video in the first place. You also cannot unblur the face to show that it is actually not you.



      Suddenly, you had an idea. You went back to your computer and used one last forensics trick...Bingo! The Chinese might tried very hard in hiding anything that revealed the video's actual location, but this showed that the video is recorded in China and not in America! Coupled with the fact that you never left America, you have found the smoking gun for you innocence!




      What is your evidence?











      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Inspired by A double-agent with a conundrum. Everything is hypothetical and while the choice of countries are important, they serve no political purpose.



      Tension between the US and China is rising. You are a senior officer working for the CIA, in charge of protecting secret technology from the hands of Chinese spies. You also appear in public often, making you the target of many hostile groups.



      One day, there appeared a video, showing you conversing and divulging classified information to China's intelligence counterpart. Espionage, if charged, means maximum security prison for life. The problem? That was not you. You believed that the Chinese government hired a body double and faked the video from mainland China to frame you into espionage. You have to prove your innocence before it's too late, because the system will err on the side of guilt except there exist a "smoking gun" evidence.



      You scrutinized the video. It started with the title "CIA senior officer at a secret meeting in Denver, August 2nd 2019." The video then cut to a likeness of you, sitting opposite a desk from two other Chinese senior ranking officers. The video seems to be captured by a hidden high quality camera. The faces were blurred in the video, but the voice sounded exactly like yours. The room was white, illuminated by bright florescence light. Besides the desk, chairs, and a clock on the wall, the room was bare. Nothing about the furniture could have told you anything about their origin. Your likeness was able to capture you quite well, copy your very mannerism and accent. He must have watched a lot of your interviews. He even wore everything that you have, down to the wrist watch. You know that everything talked about in the video are true, but the Chinese could have known that already from previous espionage attempts. The metadata was stripped bare, and no one knows who tipped the video in the first place. You also cannot unblur the face to show that it is actually not you.



      Suddenly, you had an idea. You went back to your computer and used one last forensics trick...Bingo! The Chinese might tried very hard in hiding anything that revealed the video's actual location, but this showed that the video is recorded in China and not in America! Coupled with the fact that you never left America, you have found the smoking gun for you innocence!




      What is your evidence?








      knowledge story






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 8 hours ago









      Minh TranMinh Tran

      1,6101 gold badge7 silver badges33 bronze badges




      1,6101 gold badge7 silver badges33 bronze badges























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          14













          $begingroup$

          I don't think there's anything in the story that shows that the (fictional) Chinese didn't fake this right, but here's a thing that seems like it might be easy to get wrong and possible to detect:




          The US uses 60Hz electrity and China uses 50Hz electricity, which will produce different speeds of lighting flicker from those fluorescent lights (a kind of lighting that is consistently very flickery). If the lighting flicker rate matches the video's frame rate, then there will be either no visible artefacts or there will be more or less static variation in brightness across the image as a result. If it mismatches substantially, then successive frames will either vary in overall brightness or vary in spatial brightness variation, depending on the details of the camera. Either way, if we know the video's frame rate then we should be able to tell whether the lighting is powered by 50Hz or 60Hz electricity.




          Some caveats:




          It is possible to reprocess video to change its frame rate. It is possible to rig up your own electricity generation so as to produce electricity at a frequency different from what the mains gives you.







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$










          • 3




            $begingroup$
            Nice idea! I was thinking about what to make of the clock, but anything I could come up with was boring.
            $endgroup$
            – Arnaud Mortier
            8 hours ago













          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "559"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f87302%2fprove-your-innocence%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          14













          $begingroup$

          I don't think there's anything in the story that shows that the (fictional) Chinese didn't fake this right, but here's a thing that seems like it might be easy to get wrong and possible to detect:




          The US uses 60Hz electrity and China uses 50Hz electricity, which will produce different speeds of lighting flicker from those fluorescent lights (a kind of lighting that is consistently very flickery). If the lighting flicker rate matches the video's frame rate, then there will be either no visible artefacts or there will be more or less static variation in brightness across the image as a result. If it mismatches substantially, then successive frames will either vary in overall brightness or vary in spatial brightness variation, depending on the details of the camera. Either way, if we know the video's frame rate then we should be able to tell whether the lighting is powered by 50Hz or 60Hz electricity.




          Some caveats:




          It is possible to reprocess video to change its frame rate. It is possible to rig up your own electricity generation so as to produce electricity at a frequency different from what the mains gives you.







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$










          • 3




            $begingroup$
            Nice idea! I was thinking about what to make of the clock, but anything I could come up with was boring.
            $endgroup$
            – Arnaud Mortier
            8 hours ago















          14













          $begingroup$

          I don't think there's anything in the story that shows that the (fictional) Chinese didn't fake this right, but here's a thing that seems like it might be easy to get wrong and possible to detect:




          The US uses 60Hz electrity and China uses 50Hz electricity, which will produce different speeds of lighting flicker from those fluorescent lights (a kind of lighting that is consistently very flickery). If the lighting flicker rate matches the video's frame rate, then there will be either no visible artefacts or there will be more or less static variation in brightness across the image as a result. If it mismatches substantially, then successive frames will either vary in overall brightness or vary in spatial brightness variation, depending on the details of the camera. Either way, if we know the video's frame rate then we should be able to tell whether the lighting is powered by 50Hz or 60Hz electricity.




          Some caveats:




          It is possible to reprocess video to change its frame rate. It is possible to rig up your own electricity generation so as to produce electricity at a frequency different from what the mains gives you.







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$










          • 3




            $begingroup$
            Nice idea! I was thinking about what to make of the clock, but anything I could come up with was boring.
            $endgroup$
            – Arnaud Mortier
            8 hours ago













          14














          14










          14







          $begingroup$

          I don't think there's anything in the story that shows that the (fictional) Chinese didn't fake this right, but here's a thing that seems like it might be easy to get wrong and possible to detect:




          The US uses 60Hz electrity and China uses 50Hz electricity, which will produce different speeds of lighting flicker from those fluorescent lights (a kind of lighting that is consistently very flickery). If the lighting flicker rate matches the video's frame rate, then there will be either no visible artefacts or there will be more or less static variation in brightness across the image as a result. If it mismatches substantially, then successive frames will either vary in overall brightness or vary in spatial brightness variation, depending on the details of the camera. Either way, if we know the video's frame rate then we should be able to tell whether the lighting is powered by 50Hz or 60Hz electricity.




          Some caveats:




          It is possible to reprocess video to change its frame rate. It is possible to rig up your own electricity generation so as to produce electricity at a frequency different from what the mains gives you.







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          I don't think there's anything in the story that shows that the (fictional) Chinese didn't fake this right, but here's a thing that seems like it might be easy to get wrong and possible to detect:




          The US uses 60Hz electrity and China uses 50Hz electricity, which will produce different speeds of lighting flicker from those fluorescent lights (a kind of lighting that is consistently very flickery). If the lighting flicker rate matches the video's frame rate, then there will be either no visible artefacts or there will be more or less static variation in brightness across the image as a result. If it mismatches substantially, then successive frames will either vary in overall brightness or vary in spatial brightness variation, depending on the details of the camera. Either way, if we know the video's frame rate then we should be able to tell whether the lighting is powered by 50Hz or 60Hz electricity.




          Some caveats:




          It is possible to reprocess video to change its frame rate. It is possible to rig up your own electricity generation so as to produce electricity at a frequency different from what the mains gives you.








          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 8 hours ago









          Gareth McCaughanGareth McCaughan

          79.4k3 gold badges201 silver badges307 bronze badges




          79.4k3 gold badges201 silver badges307 bronze badges










          • 3




            $begingroup$
            Nice idea! I was thinking about what to make of the clock, but anything I could come up with was boring.
            $endgroup$
            – Arnaud Mortier
            8 hours ago












          • 3




            $begingroup$
            Nice idea! I was thinking about what to make of the clock, but anything I could come up with was boring.
            $endgroup$
            – Arnaud Mortier
            8 hours ago







          3




          3




          $begingroup$
          Nice idea! I was thinking about what to make of the clock, but anything I could come up with was boring.
          $endgroup$
          – Arnaud Mortier
          8 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Nice idea! I was thinking about what to make of the clock, but anything I could come up with was boring.
          $endgroup$
          – Arnaud Mortier
          8 hours ago

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f87302%2fprove-your-innocence%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

          Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

          Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її