Is the term “small” applied differently between piston engine planes and jet engine planes?Is there a definition of light/medium/heavy aircraft?Is it incorrect to refer to a C-130 as a jet?

Numbers Decrease while Letters Increase

Dealing with an extrovert co-worker

How to prevent cutting edges on my TV, HDMI-connected?

Shouldn't the "credit score" prevent Americans from going deeper and deeper into personal debt?

Why isn't "I've" a proper response?

What to say to a student who has failed?

How do I request a longer than normal leave of absence period for my wedding?

How would one country purchase another?

Irish Snap: Variant Rules

Does norwegian.no airline overbook flights?

Earth rotation discrepancy

Which household object drew this pattern?

Why don't electrons take the shorter path in coils?

Prove your innocence

Can realistic planetary invasion have any meaningful strategy?

Is "The life is beautiful" incorrect or just very non-idiomatic?

Why did MS-DOS applications built using Turbo Pascal fail to start with a division by zero error on faster systems?

How to respectfully refuse to assist co-workers with IT issues?

What is the difference between true neutral and unaligned?

Fried gnocchi with spinach, bacon, cream sauce in a single pan

Are there account age or level requirements for obtaining special research?

Are illustrations in novels frowned upon?

What is wrong about this application of Kirchhoffs Current Law?

If the first law of thermodynamics ensures conservation of energy, why does it allow systems to lose energy?



Is the term “small” applied differently between piston engine planes and jet engine planes?


Is there a definition of light/medium/heavy aircraft?Is it incorrect to refer to a C-130 as a jet?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1












$begingroup$


My understanding was that "small" covered planes up to 12,500 pounds, no matter the engine type.



Would that be gross weight/max takeoff weight?



Brought to mind by the two recent Cessna Citation crashes (Cessna 560, Cessna 680A), and head lines of "Small jet crashed during takeoff" and "Small jet crashed during landing". Pretty sure their gross weights, 15900 lbs and 30800 lbs would push them out of the small category.



Luckily, all crew and passengers were able to walk away in both accidents.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Related: Is there a definition of light/medium/heavy aircraft? From that Q&A I read it as MTOW. I'd guess when a newspaper writes about a "small airplane" then they probably don't have ICAO or FAA regulations in mind but simply common sense, like "up to 10 seats", "up to 150 seats" and "(way) more than 200 seats" or something similar which is comprehensible to laymen.
    $endgroup$
    – PerlDuck
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    So that link would suggest "Medium" then: (E) Medium: Small commuter aircraft including business jets weighing more than 12,500 up to 41,000 lbs such as the Embraer 120 or the Learjet 35; The news couldn't even get that correct.
    $endgroup$
    – CrossRoads
    11 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    "Light" is a category with a specific criteria (MTOGW 12,500# or less). "Small" is simply an adjective, applied subjectively and without a similarly clear definition. Especially when used by reporters.
    $endgroup$
    – Ralph J
    9 hours ago


















1












$begingroup$


My understanding was that "small" covered planes up to 12,500 pounds, no matter the engine type.



Would that be gross weight/max takeoff weight?



Brought to mind by the two recent Cessna Citation crashes (Cessna 560, Cessna 680A), and head lines of "Small jet crashed during takeoff" and "Small jet crashed during landing". Pretty sure their gross weights, 15900 lbs and 30800 lbs would push them out of the small category.



Luckily, all crew and passengers were able to walk away in both accidents.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Related: Is there a definition of light/medium/heavy aircraft? From that Q&A I read it as MTOW. I'd guess when a newspaper writes about a "small airplane" then they probably don't have ICAO or FAA regulations in mind but simply common sense, like "up to 10 seats", "up to 150 seats" and "(way) more than 200 seats" or something similar which is comprehensible to laymen.
    $endgroup$
    – PerlDuck
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    So that link would suggest "Medium" then: (E) Medium: Small commuter aircraft including business jets weighing more than 12,500 up to 41,000 lbs such as the Embraer 120 or the Learjet 35; The news couldn't even get that correct.
    $endgroup$
    – CrossRoads
    11 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    "Light" is a category with a specific criteria (MTOGW 12,500# or less). "Small" is simply an adjective, applied subjectively and without a similarly clear definition. Especially when used by reporters.
    $endgroup$
    – Ralph J
    9 hours ago














1












1








1


1



$begingroup$


My understanding was that "small" covered planes up to 12,500 pounds, no matter the engine type.



Would that be gross weight/max takeoff weight?



Brought to mind by the two recent Cessna Citation crashes (Cessna 560, Cessna 680A), and head lines of "Small jet crashed during takeoff" and "Small jet crashed during landing". Pretty sure their gross weights, 15900 lbs and 30800 lbs would push them out of the small category.



Luckily, all crew and passengers were able to walk away in both accidents.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




My understanding was that "small" covered planes up to 12,500 pounds, no matter the engine type.



Would that be gross weight/max takeoff weight?



Brought to mind by the two recent Cessna Citation crashes (Cessna 560, Cessna 680A), and head lines of "Small jet crashed during takeoff" and "Small jet crashed during landing". Pretty sure their gross weights, 15900 lbs and 30800 lbs would push them out of the small category.



Luckily, all crew and passengers were able to walk away in both accidents.







airplane






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 11 hours ago







CrossRoads

















asked 11 hours ago









CrossRoadsCrossRoads

6,6911 gold badge11 silver badges22 bronze badges




6,6911 gold badge11 silver badges22 bronze badges










  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Related: Is there a definition of light/medium/heavy aircraft? From that Q&A I read it as MTOW. I'd guess when a newspaper writes about a "small airplane" then they probably don't have ICAO or FAA regulations in mind but simply common sense, like "up to 10 seats", "up to 150 seats" and "(way) more than 200 seats" or something similar which is comprehensible to laymen.
    $endgroup$
    – PerlDuck
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    So that link would suggest "Medium" then: (E) Medium: Small commuter aircraft including business jets weighing more than 12,500 up to 41,000 lbs such as the Embraer 120 or the Learjet 35; The news couldn't even get that correct.
    $endgroup$
    – CrossRoads
    11 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    "Light" is a category with a specific criteria (MTOGW 12,500# or less). "Small" is simply an adjective, applied subjectively and without a similarly clear definition. Especially when used by reporters.
    $endgroup$
    – Ralph J
    9 hours ago













  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Related: Is there a definition of light/medium/heavy aircraft? From that Q&A I read it as MTOW. I'd guess when a newspaper writes about a "small airplane" then they probably don't have ICAO or FAA regulations in mind but simply common sense, like "up to 10 seats", "up to 150 seats" and "(way) more than 200 seats" or something similar which is comprehensible to laymen.
    $endgroup$
    – PerlDuck
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    So that link would suggest "Medium" then: (E) Medium: Small commuter aircraft including business jets weighing more than 12,500 up to 41,000 lbs such as the Embraer 120 or the Learjet 35; The news couldn't even get that correct.
    $endgroup$
    – CrossRoads
    11 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    "Light" is a category with a specific criteria (MTOGW 12,500# or less). "Small" is simply an adjective, applied subjectively and without a similarly clear definition. Especially when used by reporters.
    $endgroup$
    – Ralph J
    9 hours ago








3




3




$begingroup$
Related: Is there a definition of light/medium/heavy aircraft? From that Q&A I read it as MTOW. I'd guess when a newspaper writes about a "small airplane" then they probably don't have ICAO or FAA regulations in mind but simply common sense, like "up to 10 seats", "up to 150 seats" and "(way) more than 200 seats" or something similar which is comprehensible to laymen.
$endgroup$
– PerlDuck
11 hours ago




$begingroup$
Related: Is there a definition of light/medium/heavy aircraft? From that Q&A I read it as MTOW. I'd guess when a newspaper writes about a "small airplane" then they probably don't have ICAO or FAA regulations in mind but simply common sense, like "up to 10 seats", "up to 150 seats" and "(way) more than 200 seats" or something similar which is comprehensible to laymen.
$endgroup$
– PerlDuck
11 hours ago












$begingroup$
So that link would suggest "Medium" then: (E) Medium: Small commuter aircraft including business jets weighing more than 12,500 up to 41,000 lbs such as the Embraer 120 or the Learjet 35; The news couldn't even get that correct.
$endgroup$
– CrossRoads
11 hours ago




$begingroup$
So that link would suggest "Medium" then: (E) Medium: Small commuter aircraft including business jets weighing more than 12,500 up to 41,000 lbs such as the Embraer 120 or the Learjet 35; The news couldn't even get that correct.
$endgroup$
– CrossRoads
11 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
"Light" is a category with a specific criteria (MTOGW 12,500# or less). "Small" is simply an adjective, applied subjectively and without a similarly clear definition. Especially when used by reporters.
$endgroup$
– Ralph J
9 hours ago





$begingroup$
"Light" is a category with a specific criteria (MTOGW 12,500# or less). "Small" is simply an adjective, applied subjectively and without a similarly clear definition. Especially when used by reporters.
$endgroup$
– Ralph J
9 hours ago











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















8













$begingroup$

I wouldn't expect press headlines to adhere to the FAA or ICAO definitions of "small", "large", "heavy", etc. This would be a public vernacular definition of "small", which would distinguish from the big airliners most people think of when hearing about jet planes.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Agreed, and related: Is it incorrect to refer to a C-130 as a jet?
    $endgroup$
    – ymb1
    10 hours ago













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "528"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f67974%2fis-the-term-small-applied-differently-between-piston-engine-planes-and-jet-eng%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









8













$begingroup$

I wouldn't expect press headlines to adhere to the FAA or ICAO definitions of "small", "large", "heavy", etc. This would be a public vernacular definition of "small", which would distinguish from the big airliners most people think of when hearing about jet planes.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Agreed, and related: Is it incorrect to refer to a C-130 as a jet?
    $endgroup$
    – ymb1
    10 hours ago















8













$begingroup$

I wouldn't expect press headlines to adhere to the FAA or ICAO definitions of "small", "large", "heavy", etc. This would be a public vernacular definition of "small", which would distinguish from the big airliners most people think of when hearing about jet planes.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Agreed, and related: Is it incorrect to refer to a C-130 as a jet?
    $endgroup$
    – ymb1
    10 hours ago













8














8










8







$begingroup$

I wouldn't expect press headlines to adhere to the FAA or ICAO definitions of "small", "large", "heavy", etc. This would be a public vernacular definition of "small", which would distinguish from the big airliners most people think of when hearing about jet planes.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



I wouldn't expect press headlines to adhere to the FAA or ICAO definitions of "small", "large", "heavy", etc. This would be a public vernacular definition of "small", which would distinguish from the big airliners most people think of when hearing about jet planes.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 10 hours ago









Fred LarsonFred Larson

1,54912 silver badges15 bronze badges




1,54912 silver badges15 bronze badges










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Agreed, and related: Is it incorrect to refer to a C-130 as a jet?
    $endgroup$
    – ymb1
    10 hours ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Agreed, and related: Is it incorrect to refer to a C-130 as a jet?
    $endgroup$
    – ymb1
    10 hours ago







1




1




$begingroup$
Agreed, and related: Is it incorrect to refer to a C-130 as a jet?
$endgroup$
– ymb1
10 hours ago




$begingroup$
Agreed, and related: Is it incorrect to refer to a C-130 as a jet?
$endgroup$
– ymb1
10 hours ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f67974%2fis-the-term-small-applied-differently-between-piston-engine-planes-and-jet-eng%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її