Is the term “small” applied differently between piston engine planes and jet engine planes?Is there a definition of light/medium/heavy aircraft?Is it incorrect to refer to a C-130 as a jet?
Numbers Decrease while Letters Increase
Dealing with an extrovert co-worker
How to prevent cutting edges on my TV, HDMI-connected?
Shouldn't the "credit score" prevent Americans from going deeper and deeper into personal debt?
Why isn't "I've" a proper response?
What to say to a student who has failed?
How do I request a longer than normal leave of absence period for my wedding?
How would one country purchase another?
Irish Snap: Variant Rules
Does norwegian.no airline overbook flights?
Earth rotation discrepancy
Which household object drew this pattern?
Why don't electrons take the shorter path in coils?
Prove your innocence
Can realistic planetary invasion have any meaningful strategy?
Is "The life is beautiful" incorrect or just very non-idiomatic?
Why did MS-DOS applications built using Turbo Pascal fail to start with a division by zero error on faster systems?
How to respectfully refuse to assist co-workers with IT issues?
What is the difference between true neutral and unaligned?
Fried gnocchi with spinach, bacon, cream sauce in a single pan
Are there account age or level requirements for obtaining special research?
Are illustrations in novels frowned upon?
What is wrong about this application of Kirchhoffs Current Law?
If the first law of thermodynamics ensures conservation of energy, why does it allow systems to lose energy?
Is the term “small” applied differently between piston engine planes and jet engine planes?
Is there a definition of light/medium/heavy aircraft?Is it incorrect to refer to a C-130 as a jet?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
My understanding was that "small" covered planes up to 12,500 pounds, no matter the engine type.
Would that be gross weight/max takeoff weight?
Brought to mind by the two recent Cessna Citation crashes (Cessna 560, Cessna 680A), and head lines of "Small jet crashed during takeoff" and "Small jet crashed during landing". Pretty sure their gross weights, 15900 lbs and 30800 lbs would push them out of the small category.
Luckily, all crew and passengers were able to walk away in both accidents.
airplane
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My understanding was that "small" covered planes up to 12,500 pounds, no matter the engine type.
Would that be gross weight/max takeoff weight?
Brought to mind by the two recent Cessna Citation crashes (Cessna 560, Cessna 680A), and head lines of "Small jet crashed during takeoff" and "Small jet crashed during landing". Pretty sure their gross weights, 15900 lbs and 30800 lbs would push them out of the small category.
Luckily, all crew and passengers were able to walk away in both accidents.
airplane
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
Related: Is there a definition of light/medium/heavy aircraft? From that Q&A I read it as MTOW. I'd guess when a newspaper writes about a "small airplane" then they probably don't have ICAO or FAA regulations in mind but simply common sense, like "up to 10 seats", "up to 150 seats" and "(way) more than 200 seats" or something similar which is comprehensible to laymen.
$endgroup$
– PerlDuck
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
So that link would suggest "Medium" then: (E) Medium: Small commuter aircraft including business jets weighing more than 12,500 up to 41,000 lbs such as the Embraer 120 or the Learjet 35; The news couldn't even get that correct.
$endgroup$
– CrossRoads
11 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
"Light" is a category with a specific criteria (MTOGW 12,500# or less). "Small" is simply an adjective, applied subjectively and without a similarly clear definition. Especially when used by reporters.
$endgroup$
– Ralph J
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My understanding was that "small" covered planes up to 12,500 pounds, no matter the engine type.
Would that be gross weight/max takeoff weight?
Brought to mind by the two recent Cessna Citation crashes (Cessna 560, Cessna 680A), and head lines of "Small jet crashed during takeoff" and "Small jet crashed during landing". Pretty sure their gross weights, 15900 lbs and 30800 lbs would push them out of the small category.
Luckily, all crew and passengers were able to walk away in both accidents.
airplane
$endgroup$
My understanding was that "small" covered planes up to 12,500 pounds, no matter the engine type.
Would that be gross weight/max takeoff weight?
Brought to mind by the two recent Cessna Citation crashes (Cessna 560, Cessna 680A), and head lines of "Small jet crashed during takeoff" and "Small jet crashed during landing". Pretty sure their gross weights, 15900 lbs and 30800 lbs would push them out of the small category.
Luckily, all crew and passengers were able to walk away in both accidents.
airplane
airplane
edited 11 hours ago
CrossRoads
asked 11 hours ago
CrossRoadsCrossRoads
6,6911 gold badge11 silver badges22 bronze badges
6,6911 gold badge11 silver badges22 bronze badges
3
$begingroup$
Related: Is there a definition of light/medium/heavy aircraft? From that Q&A I read it as MTOW. I'd guess when a newspaper writes about a "small airplane" then they probably don't have ICAO or FAA regulations in mind but simply common sense, like "up to 10 seats", "up to 150 seats" and "(way) more than 200 seats" or something similar which is comprehensible to laymen.
$endgroup$
– PerlDuck
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
So that link would suggest "Medium" then: (E) Medium: Small commuter aircraft including business jets weighing more than 12,500 up to 41,000 lbs such as the Embraer 120 or the Learjet 35; The news couldn't even get that correct.
$endgroup$
– CrossRoads
11 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
"Light" is a category with a specific criteria (MTOGW 12,500# or less). "Small" is simply an adjective, applied subjectively and without a similarly clear definition. Especially when used by reporters.
$endgroup$
– Ralph J
9 hours ago
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
Related: Is there a definition of light/medium/heavy aircraft? From that Q&A I read it as MTOW. I'd guess when a newspaper writes about a "small airplane" then they probably don't have ICAO or FAA regulations in mind but simply common sense, like "up to 10 seats", "up to 150 seats" and "(way) more than 200 seats" or something similar which is comprehensible to laymen.
$endgroup$
– PerlDuck
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
So that link would suggest "Medium" then: (E) Medium: Small commuter aircraft including business jets weighing more than 12,500 up to 41,000 lbs such as the Embraer 120 or the Learjet 35; The news couldn't even get that correct.
$endgroup$
– CrossRoads
11 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
"Light" is a category with a specific criteria (MTOGW 12,500# or less). "Small" is simply an adjective, applied subjectively and without a similarly clear definition. Especially when used by reporters.
$endgroup$
– Ralph J
9 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
Related: Is there a definition of light/medium/heavy aircraft? From that Q&A I read it as MTOW. I'd guess when a newspaper writes about a "small airplane" then they probably don't have ICAO or FAA regulations in mind but simply common sense, like "up to 10 seats", "up to 150 seats" and "(way) more than 200 seats" or something similar which is comprehensible to laymen.
$endgroup$
– PerlDuck
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
Related: Is there a definition of light/medium/heavy aircraft? From that Q&A I read it as MTOW. I'd guess when a newspaper writes about a "small airplane" then they probably don't have ICAO or FAA regulations in mind but simply common sense, like "up to 10 seats", "up to 150 seats" and "(way) more than 200 seats" or something similar which is comprehensible to laymen.
$endgroup$
– PerlDuck
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
So that link would suggest "Medium" then: (E) Medium: Small commuter aircraft including business jets weighing more than 12,500 up to 41,000 lbs such as the Embraer 120 or the Learjet 35; The news couldn't even get that correct.
$endgroup$
– CrossRoads
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
So that link would suggest "Medium" then: (E) Medium: Small commuter aircraft including business jets weighing more than 12,500 up to 41,000 lbs such as the Embraer 120 or the Learjet 35; The news couldn't even get that correct.
$endgroup$
– CrossRoads
11 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
"Light" is a category with a specific criteria (MTOGW 12,500# or less). "Small" is simply an adjective, applied subjectively and without a similarly clear definition. Especially when used by reporters.
$endgroup$
– Ralph J
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
"Light" is a category with a specific criteria (MTOGW 12,500# or less). "Small" is simply an adjective, applied subjectively and without a similarly clear definition. Especially when used by reporters.
$endgroup$
– Ralph J
9 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I wouldn't expect press headlines to adhere to the FAA or ICAO definitions of "small", "large", "heavy", etc. This would be a public vernacular definition of "small", which would distinguish from the big airliners most people think of when hearing about jet planes.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Agreed, and related: Is it incorrect to refer to a C-130 as a jet?
$endgroup$
– ymb1
10 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "528"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f67974%2fis-the-term-small-applied-differently-between-piston-engine-planes-and-jet-eng%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I wouldn't expect press headlines to adhere to the FAA or ICAO definitions of "small", "large", "heavy", etc. This would be a public vernacular definition of "small", which would distinguish from the big airliners most people think of when hearing about jet planes.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Agreed, and related: Is it incorrect to refer to a C-130 as a jet?
$endgroup$
– ymb1
10 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I wouldn't expect press headlines to adhere to the FAA or ICAO definitions of "small", "large", "heavy", etc. This would be a public vernacular definition of "small", which would distinguish from the big airliners most people think of when hearing about jet planes.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Agreed, and related: Is it incorrect to refer to a C-130 as a jet?
$endgroup$
– ymb1
10 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I wouldn't expect press headlines to adhere to the FAA or ICAO definitions of "small", "large", "heavy", etc. This would be a public vernacular definition of "small", which would distinguish from the big airliners most people think of when hearing about jet planes.
$endgroup$
I wouldn't expect press headlines to adhere to the FAA or ICAO definitions of "small", "large", "heavy", etc. This would be a public vernacular definition of "small", which would distinguish from the big airliners most people think of when hearing about jet planes.
answered 10 hours ago
Fred LarsonFred Larson
1,54912 silver badges15 bronze badges
1,54912 silver badges15 bronze badges
1
$begingroup$
Agreed, and related: Is it incorrect to refer to a C-130 as a jet?
$endgroup$
– ymb1
10 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Agreed, and related: Is it incorrect to refer to a C-130 as a jet?
$endgroup$
– ymb1
10 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Agreed, and related: Is it incorrect to refer to a C-130 as a jet?
$endgroup$
– ymb1
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
Agreed, and related: Is it incorrect to refer to a C-130 as a jet?
$endgroup$
– ymb1
10 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f67974%2fis-the-term-small-applied-differently-between-piston-engine-planes-and-jet-eng%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
Related: Is there a definition of light/medium/heavy aircraft? From that Q&A I read it as MTOW. I'd guess when a newspaper writes about a "small airplane" then they probably don't have ICAO or FAA regulations in mind but simply common sense, like "up to 10 seats", "up to 150 seats" and "(way) more than 200 seats" or something similar which is comprehensible to laymen.
$endgroup$
– PerlDuck
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
So that link would suggest "Medium" then: (E) Medium: Small commuter aircraft including business jets weighing more than 12,500 up to 41,000 lbs such as the Embraer 120 or the Learjet 35; The news couldn't even get that correct.
$endgroup$
– CrossRoads
11 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
"Light" is a category with a specific criteria (MTOGW 12,500# or less). "Small" is simply an adjective, applied subjectively and without a similarly clear definition. Especially when used by reporters.
$endgroup$
– Ralph J
9 hours ago