Could flaps be raised upward to serve as spoilers / lift dumpers?Do negative flaps increase glide ratio?Could flaps replace spoilers by deflecting more than 90°?Is it considered good or bad practice to raise the flaps right after touchdown?Can a super land without flaps/spoilers?Do flaps have a maximum speed limit but spoilers don't? Why?What are the differences between air brakes, spoilers and lift dumpers?What theoretically would happen if the flaps were extending even further?If no low-speed compromises were made, what would an ideal Mach-3 wing look like?Could flight control be achieved by rotating a wing entirely?Why didn't the Concorde have flaps or slats?Could Mach 1.4 be a better design point for SST?Could flaps replace spoilers by deflecting more than 90°?
A coworker mumbles to herself when working. How can I ask her to stop?
How to structure presentation to avoid getting questions that will be answered later in the presentation?
Derivative is just speed of change?
Should I put my name first or last in the team members list?
Delete the following space
Why is “deal 6 damage” a legit phrase?
Can machine learning learn a function like finding maximum from a list?
Guidelines for writing a chord progression
Oath of redemption: Does Emmissary of Peace reflect damage taken from Aura of the Guardian?
How does Asimov's second law deal with contradictory orders from different people?
Help me, I hate squares!
How to crop this photo of water drops on a leaf to improve the composition?
Is this mechanically safe?
Should 2FA be enabled on service accounts?
Return last number in sub-sequences in a list of integers
Can I shorten this filter, that finds disk sizes over 100G?
Backpacking with incontinence
How to derive trigonometric Cartesian equation from parametric
Adding a (stair/baby) gate without facing walls
"DDoouubbllee ssppeeaakk!!"
Should students have access to past exams or an exam bank?
Are some indefinite integrals impossible to compute or just don't exist?
mv Command Deleted Files In Source Directory and Target Directory
Why did the United States not resort to nuclear weapons in Vietnam?
Could flaps be raised upward to serve as spoilers / lift dumpers?
Do negative flaps increase glide ratio?Could flaps replace spoilers by deflecting more than 90°?Is it considered good or bad practice to raise the flaps right after touchdown?Can a super land without flaps/spoilers?Do flaps have a maximum speed limit but spoilers don't? Why?What are the differences between air brakes, spoilers and lift dumpers?What theoretically would happen if the flaps were extending even further?If no low-speed compromises were made, what would an ideal Mach-3 wing look like?Could flight control be achieved by rotating a wing entirely?Why didn't the Concorde have flaps or slats?Could Mach 1.4 be a better design point for SST?Could flaps replace spoilers by deflecting more than 90°?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
I should preface that I'm by no means an aviation person. I'm just in a aircraft knowledge obsession phase and daydreaming about designing my own ultralight (will never happen).
The idea would be to simplify and lighten a small aircraft using the flaps as spoilers. As a practical example, the same handle could be used in one movement to get from flaps raised just before touchdown to spoiler raised just after it, making it fast and intuitive.
Basically you would have on a single axis :
high lift + high drag <-> normal lift + low drag <-> low lift + high drag
Is that possible? I guess not because I couldn't find anything like that, but why?
I name them flapoilers.

The Fairey-Youngman flaps seem to do that but all I could find as explanation is "so that the aircraft could be dived vertically without needing excessive trim changes" and I'm not sure how to understand that.
aircraft-design flaps spoilers
New contributor
Adel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I should preface that I'm by no means an aviation person. I'm just in a aircraft knowledge obsession phase and daydreaming about designing my own ultralight (will never happen).
The idea would be to simplify and lighten a small aircraft using the flaps as spoilers. As a practical example, the same handle could be used in one movement to get from flaps raised just before touchdown to spoiler raised just after it, making it fast and intuitive.
Basically you would have on a single axis :
high lift + high drag <-> normal lift + low drag <-> low lift + high drag
Is that possible? I guess not because I couldn't find anything like that, but why?
I name them flapoilers.

The Fairey-Youngman flaps seem to do that but all I could find as explanation is "so that the aircraft could be dived vertically without needing excessive trim changes" and I'm not sure how to understand that.
aircraft-design flaps spoilers
New contributor
Adel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Welcome to Stack Exchange! I think this is a very interesting question.
$endgroup$
– Tanner Swett
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you for the welcome! This forum has tons of really great questions and information, it's a great source of brain food.
$endgroup$
– Adel
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Related: Could flaps replace spoilers by deflecting more than 90°?
$endgroup$
– ymb1
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
"simplify and lighten": the latter will certainly be true when combining functions, the former (probably) not. Recently came across an article by one of Airbus' heads of R&D, detailing their/his vision on multifunctional wing movables. Interesting read: issuu.com/maurits11/docs/00_magazine_/10.
$endgroup$
– Bram
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Pretty sure this is done on some model gliders but I don't have my copy of Simon's book handy atm.
$endgroup$
– AEhere
8 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I should preface that I'm by no means an aviation person. I'm just in a aircraft knowledge obsession phase and daydreaming about designing my own ultralight (will never happen).
The idea would be to simplify and lighten a small aircraft using the flaps as spoilers. As a practical example, the same handle could be used in one movement to get from flaps raised just before touchdown to spoiler raised just after it, making it fast and intuitive.
Basically you would have on a single axis :
high lift + high drag <-> normal lift + low drag <-> low lift + high drag
Is that possible? I guess not because I couldn't find anything like that, but why?
I name them flapoilers.

The Fairey-Youngman flaps seem to do that but all I could find as explanation is "so that the aircraft could be dived vertically without needing excessive trim changes" and I'm not sure how to understand that.
aircraft-design flaps spoilers
New contributor
Adel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
I should preface that I'm by no means an aviation person. I'm just in a aircraft knowledge obsession phase and daydreaming about designing my own ultralight (will never happen).
The idea would be to simplify and lighten a small aircraft using the flaps as spoilers. As a practical example, the same handle could be used in one movement to get from flaps raised just before touchdown to spoiler raised just after it, making it fast and intuitive.
Basically you would have on a single axis :
high lift + high drag <-> normal lift + low drag <-> low lift + high drag
Is that possible? I guess not because I couldn't find anything like that, but why?
I name them flapoilers.

The Fairey-Youngman flaps seem to do that but all I could find as explanation is "so that the aircraft could be dived vertically without needing excessive trim changes" and I'm not sure how to understand that.
aircraft-design flaps spoilers
aircraft-design flaps spoilers
New contributor
Adel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Adel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 9 hours ago
Adel
New contributor
Adel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 9 hours ago
AdelAdel
363 bronze badges
363 bronze badges
New contributor
Adel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Adel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
$begingroup$
Welcome to Stack Exchange! I think this is a very interesting question.
$endgroup$
– Tanner Swett
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you for the welcome! This forum has tons of really great questions and information, it's a great source of brain food.
$endgroup$
– Adel
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Related: Could flaps replace spoilers by deflecting more than 90°?
$endgroup$
– ymb1
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
"simplify and lighten": the latter will certainly be true when combining functions, the former (probably) not. Recently came across an article by one of Airbus' heads of R&D, detailing their/his vision on multifunctional wing movables. Interesting read: issuu.com/maurits11/docs/00_magazine_/10.
$endgroup$
– Bram
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Pretty sure this is done on some model gliders but I don't have my copy of Simon's book handy atm.
$endgroup$
– AEhere
8 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
1
$begingroup$
Welcome to Stack Exchange! I think this is a very interesting question.
$endgroup$
– Tanner Swett
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you for the welcome! This forum has tons of really great questions and information, it's a great source of brain food.
$endgroup$
– Adel
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Related: Could flaps replace spoilers by deflecting more than 90°?
$endgroup$
– ymb1
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
"simplify and lighten": the latter will certainly be true when combining functions, the former (probably) not. Recently came across an article by one of Airbus' heads of R&D, detailing their/his vision on multifunctional wing movables. Interesting read: issuu.com/maurits11/docs/00_magazine_/10.
$endgroup$
– Bram
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Pretty sure this is done on some model gliders but I don't have my copy of Simon's book handy atm.
$endgroup$
– AEhere
8 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Welcome to Stack Exchange! I think this is a very interesting question.
$endgroup$
– Tanner Swett
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Welcome to Stack Exchange! I think this is a very interesting question.
$endgroup$
– Tanner Swett
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you for the welcome! This forum has tons of really great questions and information, it's a great source of brain food.
$endgroup$
– Adel
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you for the welcome! This forum has tons of really great questions and information, it's a great source of brain food.
$endgroup$
– Adel
9 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Related: Could flaps replace spoilers by deflecting more than 90°?
$endgroup$
– ymb1
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Related: Could flaps replace spoilers by deflecting more than 90°?
$endgroup$
– ymb1
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
"simplify and lighten": the latter will certainly be true when combining functions, the former (probably) not. Recently came across an article by one of Airbus' heads of R&D, detailing their/his vision on multifunctional wing movables. Interesting read: issuu.com/maurits11/docs/00_magazine_/10.
$endgroup$
– Bram
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
"simplify and lighten": the latter will certainly be true when combining functions, the former (probably) not. Recently came across an article by one of Airbus' heads of R&D, detailing their/his vision on multifunctional wing movables. Interesting read: issuu.com/maurits11/docs/00_magazine_/10.
$endgroup$
– Bram
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Pretty sure this is done on some model gliders but I don't have my copy of Simon's book handy atm.
$endgroup$
– AEhere
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Pretty sure this is done on some model gliders but I don't have my copy of Simon's book handy atm.
$endgroup$
– AEhere
8 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
One reason is that any device you want to use as a lift dumper needs to be able to be instantly retracted and this is really difficult to do with a flap. On an airliner when the lift dumpers come up, if you slam the thrust back up to TO, they immediately come back down. A flap system with its slow moving drive line can't do this, and it's enough that it has to be retracted from landing to takeoff setting for a balked landing like that.
Plus, even in a normal landing, you would be landing with the flaps at the landing setting, and when you touch down they would need 10-20 seconds a typical drive system would need to move up past 0 to a fully up position. You'd be stopped by then, and deciding to take off again on the rollout is out of the question.
So you can see that any system like this would require flaps that can move up and down rapidly like ailerons. A really difficult engineering problem.
You might do this on a small airplane with manual flaps operated by a lever, but now you have to cater to twice the movement range as regular flaps, and you'd lose the mechanical leverage you'd need for manual flaps to work unless you made the lever move twice as far (by say having it move in a 180 degree arc - but now the lever handle is in the back seat).
Lots of gliders use flaps - without any spoilers - and they can in most cases be "reflexed" up a small amount, but this feature is done only to unload the trailing edge region for high speed running which has an effect similar to reducing wing area and pitching moment to reduce both induced drag and trim drag.
For approach control and landing, they actually do the opposite of what you would think; you drop the flaps down to near 90 degrees when you want to come down steeply and for the landing roll. Not everybody likes that kind of system because you have the same problem - you can't bring them up and down quickly like spoilers so you can't work the flap lever like a throttle on approach the way you normally do with regular spoilers/dive brakes, and they require different flying techniques, on which a pilot used to spoilers needs to be carefully briefed to avoid trouble.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I was thinking for small planes using levers yes. So it's doable as long as the movement range is carefully designed? The technique of "flaps raised before touchdown and flaps down and spoiler up for hard brake" seem to be used by STOL bush plane flyers. They often don't have spoilers though...
$endgroup$
– Adel
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Sure if you had simple plain flaps on a light airplane it would be a simple matter to set the "up" stop at say 20 deg reflexed up if you could set up the required travel range in the lever. But I'm pretty sure you wouldn't find them all that useful in the overall scheme of things, which is why you don't see them very much.
$endgroup$
– John K
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What is created by deflecting a flap (or aileron) up is a reflexed airfoil, which, at higher angle of attack actually might create LESS drag and contribute a lower pitching up tendency. This design is used on flying wings, while others prefer to have pitch control duties handled by a separate tail.
Conceptually, "flapoilers" are a good idea, but aerodynamics requires spoilers to be placed further forward on the upper wing surface to be effective.
There for, they are usually a separate control surface from flaps, although a "clamshell" arrangement is seen as a speed brake. Model gliders, as AEhere mentioned, put both ailerons up and (closer to fuselage) flaps down in the "crow" configuration to achieve spot landings in competition.
But keep spoilers in mind as the (old and new B-52) makes very effective use of them as
"spoilerons" to bank and turn the aircraft.
But, with exception of some gliders, most aircraft want to land at as low an airspeed with as much drag as possible. This favors the flap.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For radio- controlled gliders, it is common to deflect both (outboard) ailerons upward while also deflecting both (inboard) flaps downward. This combination is called "crow", and it makes lots of drag to allow for a steeper glide path for easier landings, with no increase in stall speed.
Something similar would surely be possible with some full-scale aircraft, though as other answers have noted, there may be some engineering challenges.
Actually what you are trying to do is INCREASE the stall speed when the surface is deployed. (So after the wheels touch, the flaps suddenly snap to the raised-upward position.) My point is just that in the R.C. world it is possible for a control surface to be fast-moving AND to hold position in the face of heavy aerodynamic loading, so there must be SOME way scale this up. Whether that would ever be considered an optimal or good approach, is another matter.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
( I now see some other answers have specifically mentioned crow)
$endgroup$
– quiet flyer
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Current designs do not support that. In planes with Fowler style flaps for example, the flaps extend down and back on a curved track. The top back of the wing extends over the top of the flap when retracted to make a smooth surface. The track would have to be redesigned to allow the flap to go up.
I have not felt the need for spoilers in my 4-seat plane. Any big altitude losses, generally when coming in too high on final, can be accomplished by side slipping the plane - lots of right rudder while banking left with the ailerons for example. Makes the plane nice and draggy to enhance vertical descent rate.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Probably not since spoilers are located further up the wing (leading edge) to "spoil the air" that is moving faster over the top of the wing rather than after it falls off the back of the wing hitting the air from underneath. None the less, the idea sounds logical. My glider has spoilers do to the huge amount lift the wings produce and can send you rising past 15K feet before you know it and needing O2!! The spoilers are a separate lever and lift the flaps that are centered over the middle area of the wings and give equal "spoiling" allowing the aircraft to slow down evenly without tipping the nose up or down like control surfaces on the trailing edges do.
New contributor
Bert Wonderstone is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "528"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Adel is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f67246%2fcould-flaps-be-raised-upward-to-serve-as-spoilers-lift-dumpers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
One reason is that any device you want to use as a lift dumper needs to be able to be instantly retracted and this is really difficult to do with a flap. On an airliner when the lift dumpers come up, if you slam the thrust back up to TO, they immediately come back down. A flap system with its slow moving drive line can't do this, and it's enough that it has to be retracted from landing to takeoff setting for a balked landing like that.
Plus, even in a normal landing, you would be landing with the flaps at the landing setting, and when you touch down they would need 10-20 seconds a typical drive system would need to move up past 0 to a fully up position. You'd be stopped by then, and deciding to take off again on the rollout is out of the question.
So you can see that any system like this would require flaps that can move up and down rapidly like ailerons. A really difficult engineering problem.
You might do this on a small airplane with manual flaps operated by a lever, but now you have to cater to twice the movement range as regular flaps, and you'd lose the mechanical leverage you'd need for manual flaps to work unless you made the lever move twice as far (by say having it move in a 180 degree arc - but now the lever handle is in the back seat).
Lots of gliders use flaps - without any spoilers - and they can in most cases be "reflexed" up a small amount, but this feature is done only to unload the trailing edge region for high speed running which has an effect similar to reducing wing area and pitching moment to reduce both induced drag and trim drag.
For approach control and landing, they actually do the opposite of what you would think; you drop the flaps down to near 90 degrees when you want to come down steeply and for the landing roll. Not everybody likes that kind of system because you have the same problem - you can't bring them up and down quickly like spoilers so you can't work the flap lever like a throttle on approach the way you normally do with regular spoilers/dive brakes, and they require different flying techniques, on which a pilot used to spoilers needs to be carefully briefed to avoid trouble.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I was thinking for small planes using levers yes. So it's doable as long as the movement range is carefully designed? The technique of "flaps raised before touchdown and flaps down and spoiler up for hard brake" seem to be used by STOL bush plane flyers. They often don't have spoilers though...
$endgroup$
– Adel
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Sure if you had simple plain flaps on a light airplane it would be a simple matter to set the "up" stop at say 20 deg reflexed up if you could set up the required travel range in the lever. But I'm pretty sure you wouldn't find them all that useful in the overall scheme of things, which is why you don't see them very much.
$endgroup$
– John K
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
One reason is that any device you want to use as a lift dumper needs to be able to be instantly retracted and this is really difficult to do with a flap. On an airliner when the lift dumpers come up, if you slam the thrust back up to TO, they immediately come back down. A flap system with its slow moving drive line can't do this, and it's enough that it has to be retracted from landing to takeoff setting for a balked landing like that.
Plus, even in a normal landing, you would be landing with the flaps at the landing setting, and when you touch down they would need 10-20 seconds a typical drive system would need to move up past 0 to a fully up position. You'd be stopped by then, and deciding to take off again on the rollout is out of the question.
So you can see that any system like this would require flaps that can move up and down rapidly like ailerons. A really difficult engineering problem.
You might do this on a small airplane with manual flaps operated by a lever, but now you have to cater to twice the movement range as regular flaps, and you'd lose the mechanical leverage you'd need for manual flaps to work unless you made the lever move twice as far (by say having it move in a 180 degree arc - but now the lever handle is in the back seat).
Lots of gliders use flaps - without any spoilers - and they can in most cases be "reflexed" up a small amount, but this feature is done only to unload the trailing edge region for high speed running which has an effect similar to reducing wing area and pitching moment to reduce both induced drag and trim drag.
For approach control and landing, they actually do the opposite of what you would think; you drop the flaps down to near 90 degrees when you want to come down steeply and for the landing roll. Not everybody likes that kind of system because you have the same problem - you can't bring them up and down quickly like spoilers so you can't work the flap lever like a throttle on approach the way you normally do with regular spoilers/dive brakes, and they require different flying techniques, on which a pilot used to spoilers needs to be carefully briefed to avoid trouble.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I was thinking for small planes using levers yes. So it's doable as long as the movement range is carefully designed? The technique of "flaps raised before touchdown and flaps down and spoiler up for hard brake" seem to be used by STOL bush plane flyers. They often don't have spoilers though...
$endgroup$
– Adel
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Sure if you had simple plain flaps on a light airplane it would be a simple matter to set the "up" stop at say 20 deg reflexed up if you could set up the required travel range in the lever. But I'm pretty sure you wouldn't find them all that useful in the overall scheme of things, which is why you don't see them very much.
$endgroup$
– John K
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
One reason is that any device you want to use as a lift dumper needs to be able to be instantly retracted and this is really difficult to do with a flap. On an airliner when the lift dumpers come up, if you slam the thrust back up to TO, they immediately come back down. A flap system with its slow moving drive line can't do this, and it's enough that it has to be retracted from landing to takeoff setting for a balked landing like that.
Plus, even in a normal landing, you would be landing with the flaps at the landing setting, and when you touch down they would need 10-20 seconds a typical drive system would need to move up past 0 to a fully up position. You'd be stopped by then, and deciding to take off again on the rollout is out of the question.
So you can see that any system like this would require flaps that can move up and down rapidly like ailerons. A really difficult engineering problem.
You might do this on a small airplane with manual flaps operated by a lever, but now you have to cater to twice the movement range as regular flaps, and you'd lose the mechanical leverage you'd need for manual flaps to work unless you made the lever move twice as far (by say having it move in a 180 degree arc - but now the lever handle is in the back seat).
Lots of gliders use flaps - without any spoilers - and they can in most cases be "reflexed" up a small amount, but this feature is done only to unload the trailing edge region for high speed running which has an effect similar to reducing wing area and pitching moment to reduce both induced drag and trim drag.
For approach control and landing, they actually do the opposite of what you would think; you drop the flaps down to near 90 degrees when you want to come down steeply and for the landing roll. Not everybody likes that kind of system because you have the same problem - you can't bring them up and down quickly like spoilers so you can't work the flap lever like a throttle on approach the way you normally do with regular spoilers/dive brakes, and they require different flying techniques, on which a pilot used to spoilers needs to be carefully briefed to avoid trouble.
$endgroup$
One reason is that any device you want to use as a lift dumper needs to be able to be instantly retracted and this is really difficult to do with a flap. On an airliner when the lift dumpers come up, if you slam the thrust back up to TO, they immediately come back down. A flap system with its slow moving drive line can't do this, and it's enough that it has to be retracted from landing to takeoff setting for a balked landing like that.
Plus, even in a normal landing, you would be landing with the flaps at the landing setting, and when you touch down they would need 10-20 seconds a typical drive system would need to move up past 0 to a fully up position. You'd be stopped by then, and deciding to take off again on the rollout is out of the question.
So you can see that any system like this would require flaps that can move up and down rapidly like ailerons. A really difficult engineering problem.
You might do this on a small airplane with manual flaps operated by a lever, but now you have to cater to twice the movement range as regular flaps, and you'd lose the mechanical leverage you'd need for manual flaps to work unless you made the lever move twice as far (by say having it move in a 180 degree arc - but now the lever handle is in the back seat).
Lots of gliders use flaps - without any spoilers - and they can in most cases be "reflexed" up a small amount, but this feature is done only to unload the trailing edge region for high speed running which has an effect similar to reducing wing area and pitching moment to reduce both induced drag and trim drag.
For approach control and landing, they actually do the opposite of what you would think; you drop the flaps down to near 90 degrees when you want to come down steeply and for the landing roll. Not everybody likes that kind of system because you have the same problem - you can't bring them up and down quickly like spoilers so you can't work the flap lever like a throttle on approach the way you normally do with regular spoilers/dive brakes, and they require different flying techniques, on which a pilot used to spoilers needs to be carefully briefed to avoid trouble.
answered 9 hours ago
John KJohn K
36.5k1 gold badge63 silver badges120 bronze badges
36.5k1 gold badge63 silver badges120 bronze badges
$begingroup$
I was thinking for small planes using levers yes. So it's doable as long as the movement range is carefully designed? The technique of "flaps raised before touchdown and flaps down and spoiler up for hard brake" seem to be used by STOL bush plane flyers. They often don't have spoilers though...
$endgroup$
– Adel
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Sure if you had simple plain flaps on a light airplane it would be a simple matter to set the "up" stop at say 20 deg reflexed up if you could set up the required travel range in the lever. But I'm pretty sure you wouldn't find them all that useful in the overall scheme of things, which is why you don't see them very much.
$endgroup$
– John K
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was thinking for small planes using levers yes. So it's doable as long as the movement range is carefully designed? The technique of "flaps raised before touchdown and flaps down and spoiler up for hard brake" seem to be used by STOL bush plane flyers. They often don't have spoilers though...
$endgroup$
– Adel
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Sure if you had simple plain flaps on a light airplane it would be a simple matter to set the "up" stop at say 20 deg reflexed up if you could set up the required travel range in the lever. But I'm pretty sure you wouldn't find them all that useful in the overall scheme of things, which is why you don't see them very much.
$endgroup$
– John K
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I was thinking for small planes using levers yes. So it's doable as long as the movement range is carefully designed? The technique of "flaps raised before touchdown and flaps down and spoiler up for hard brake" seem to be used by STOL bush plane flyers. They often don't have spoilers though...
$endgroup$
– Adel
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
I was thinking for small planes using levers yes. So it's doable as long as the movement range is carefully designed? The technique of "flaps raised before touchdown and flaps down and spoiler up for hard brake" seem to be used by STOL bush plane flyers. They often don't have spoilers though...
$endgroup$
– Adel
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Sure if you had simple plain flaps on a light airplane it would be a simple matter to set the "up" stop at say 20 deg reflexed up if you could set up the required travel range in the lever. But I'm pretty sure you wouldn't find them all that useful in the overall scheme of things, which is why you don't see them very much.
$endgroup$
– John K
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Sure if you had simple plain flaps on a light airplane it would be a simple matter to set the "up" stop at say 20 deg reflexed up if you could set up the required travel range in the lever. But I'm pretty sure you wouldn't find them all that useful in the overall scheme of things, which is why you don't see them very much.
$endgroup$
– John K
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What is created by deflecting a flap (or aileron) up is a reflexed airfoil, which, at higher angle of attack actually might create LESS drag and contribute a lower pitching up tendency. This design is used on flying wings, while others prefer to have pitch control duties handled by a separate tail.
Conceptually, "flapoilers" are a good idea, but aerodynamics requires spoilers to be placed further forward on the upper wing surface to be effective.
There for, they are usually a separate control surface from flaps, although a "clamshell" arrangement is seen as a speed brake. Model gliders, as AEhere mentioned, put both ailerons up and (closer to fuselage) flaps down in the "crow" configuration to achieve spot landings in competition.
But keep spoilers in mind as the (old and new B-52) makes very effective use of them as
"spoilerons" to bank and turn the aircraft.
But, with exception of some gliders, most aircraft want to land at as low an airspeed with as much drag as possible. This favors the flap.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What is created by deflecting a flap (or aileron) up is a reflexed airfoil, which, at higher angle of attack actually might create LESS drag and contribute a lower pitching up tendency. This design is used on flying wings, while others prefer to have pitch control duties handled by a separate tail.
Conceptually, "flapoilers" are a good idea, but aerodynamics requires spoilers to be placed further forward on the upper wing surface to be effective.
There for, they are usually a separate control surface from flaps, although a "clamshell" arrangement is seen as a speed brake. Model gliders, as AEhere mentioned, put both ailerons up and (closer to fuselage) flaps down in the "crow" configuration to achieve spot landings in competition.
But keep spoilers in mind as the (old and new B-52) makes very effective use of them as
"spoilerons" to bank and turn the aircraft.
But, with exception of some gliders, most aircraft want to land at as low an airspeed with as much drag as possible. This favors the flap.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What is created by deflecting a flap (or aileron) up is a reflexed airfoil, which, at higher angle of attack actually might create LESS drag and contribute a lower pitching up tendency. This design is used on flying wings, while others prefer to have pitch control duties handled by a separate tail.
Conceptually, "flapoilers" are a good idea, but aerodynamics requires spoilers to be placed further forward on the upper wing surface to be effective.
There for, they are usually a separate control surface from flaps, although a "clamshell" arrangement is seen as a speed brake. Model gliders, as AEhere mentioned, put both ailerons up and (closer to fuselage) flaps down in the "crow" configuration to achieve spot landings in competition.
But keep spoilers in mind as the (old and new B-52) makes very effective use of them as
"spoilerons" to bank and turn the aircraft.
But, with exception of some gliders, most aircraft want to land at as low an airspeed with as much drag as possible. This favors the flap.
$endgroup$
What is created by deflecting a flap (or aileron) up is a reflexed airfoil, which, at higher angle of attack actually might create LESS drag and contribute a lower pitching up tendency. This design is used on flying wings, while others prefer to have pitch control duties handled by a separate tail.
Conceptually, "flapoilers" are a good idea, but aerodynamics requires spoilers to be placed further forward on the upper wing surface to be effective.
There for, they are usually a separate control surface from flaps, although a "clamshell" arrangement is seen as a speed brake. Model gliders, as AEhere mentioned, put both ailerons up and (closer to fuselage) flaps down in the "crow" configuration to achieve spot landings in competition.
But keep spoilers in mind as the (old and new B-52) makes very effective use of them as
"spoilerons" to bank and turn the aircraft.
But, with exception of some gliders, most aircraft want to land at as low an airspeed with as much drag as possible. This favors the flap.
answered 3 hours ago
Robert DiGiovanniRobert DiGiovanni
4,4421 gold badge4 silver badges22 bronze badges
4,4421 gold badge4 silver badges22 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For radio- controlled gliders, it is common to deflect both (outboard) ailerons upward while also deflecting both (inboard) flaps downward. This combination is called "crow", and it makes lots of drag to allow for a steeper glide path for easier landings, with no increase in stall speed.
Something similar would surely be possible with some full-scale aircraft, though as other answers have noted, there may be some engineering challenges.
Actually what you are trying to do is INCREASE the stall speed when the surface is deployed. (So after the wheels touch, the flaps suddenly snap to the raised-upward position.) My point is just that in the R.C. world it is possible for a control surface to be fast-moving AND to hold position in the face of heavy aerodynamic loading, so there must be SOME way scale this up. Whether that would ever be considered an optimal or good approach, is another matter.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
( I now see some other answers have specifically mentioned crow)
$endgroup$
– quiet flyer
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For radio- controlled gliders, it is common to deflect both (outboard) ailerons upward while also deflecting both (inboard) flaps downward. This combination is called "crow", and it makes lots of drag to allow for a steeper glide path for easier landings, with no increase in stall speed.
Something similar would surely be possible with some full-scale aircraft, though as other answers have noted, there may be some engineering challenges.
Actually what you are trying to do is INCREASE the stall speed when the surface is deployed. (So after the wheels touch, the flaps suddenly snap to the raised-upward position.) My point is just that in the R.C. world it is possible for a control surface to be fast-moving AND to hold position in the face of heavy aerodynamic loading, so there must be SOME way scale this up. Whether that would ever be considered an optimal or good approach, is another matter.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
( I now see some other answers have specifically mentioned crow)
$endgroup$
– quiet flyer
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For radio- controlled gliders, it is common to deflect both (outboard) ailerons upward while also deflecting both (inboard) flaps downward. This combination is called "crow", and it makes lots of drag to allow for a steeper glide path for easier landings, with no increase in stall speed.
Something similar would surely be possible with some full-scale aircraft, though as other answers have noted, there may be some engineering challenges.
Actually what you are trying to do is INCREASE the stall speed when the surface is deployed. (So after the wheels touch, the flaps suddenly snap to the raised-upward position.) My point is just that in the R.C. world it is possible for a control surface to be fast-moving AND to hold position in the face of heavy aerodynamic loading, so there must be SOME way scale this up. Whether that would ever be considered an optimal or good approach, is another matter.
$endgroup$
For radio- controlled gliders, it is common to deflect both (outboard) ailerons upward while also deflecting both (inboard) flaps downward. This combination is called "crow", and it makes lots of drag to allow for a steeper glide path for easier landings, with no increase in stall speed.
Something similar would surely be possible with some full-scale aircraft, though as other answers have noted, there may be some engineering challenges.
Actually what you are trying to do is INCREASE the stall speed when the surface is deployed. (So after the wheels touch, the flaps suddenly snap to the raised-upward position.) My point is just that in the R.C. world it is possible for a control surface to be fast-moving AND to hold position in the face of heavy aerodynamic loading, so there must be SOME way scale this up. Whether that would ever be considered an optimal or good approach, is another matter.
edited 3 hours ago
answered 3 hours ago
quiet flyerquiet flyer
4,3307 silver badges42 bronze badges
4,3307 silver badges42 bronze badges
$begingroup$
( I now see some other answers have specifically mentioned crow)
$endgroup$
– quiet flyer
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
( I now see some other answers have specifically mentioned crow)
$endgroup$
– quiet flyer
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
( I now see some other answers have specifically mentioned crow)
$endgroup$
– quiet flyer
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
( I now see some other answers have specifically mentioned crow)
$endgroup$
– quiet flyer
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Current designs do not support that. In planes with Fowler style flaps for example, the flaps extend down and back on a curved track. The top back of the wing extends over the top of the flap when retracted to make a smooth surface. The track would have to be redesigned to allow the flap to go up.
I have not felt the need for spoilers in my 4-seat plane. Any big altitude losses, generally when coming in too high on final, can be accomplished by side slipping the plane - lots of right rudder while banking left with the ailerons for example. Makes the plane nice and draggy to enhance vertical descent rate.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Current designs do not support that. In planes with Fowler style flaps for example, the flaps extend down and back on a curved track. The top back of the wing extends over the top of the flap when retracted to make a smooth surface. The track would have to be redesigned to allow the flap to go up.
I have not felt the need for spoilers in my 4-seat plane. Any big altitude losses, generally when coming in too high on final, can be accomplished by side slipping the plane - lots of right rudder while banking left with the ailerons for example. Makes the plane nice and draggy to enhance vertical descent rate.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Current designs do not support that. In planes with Fowler style flaps for example, the flaps extend down and back on a curved track. The top back of the wing extends over the top of the flap when retracted to make a smooth surface. The track would have to be redesigned to allow the flap to go up.
I have not felt the need for spoilers in my 4-seat plane. Any big altitude losses, generally when coming in too high on final, can be accomplished by side slipping the plane - lots of right rudder while banking left with the ailerons for example. Makes the plane nice and draggy to enhance vertical descent rate.
$endgroup$
Current designs do not support that. In planes with Fowler style flaps for example, the flaps extend down and back on a curved track. The top back of the wing extends over the top of the flap when retracted to make a smooth surface. The track would have to be redesigned to allow the flap to go up.
I have not felt the need for spoilers in my 4-seat plane. Any big altitude losses, generally when coming in too high on final, can be accomplished by side slipping the plane - lots of right rudder while banking left with the ailerons for example. Makes the plane nice and draggy to enhance vertical descent rate.
answered 9 hours ago
CrossRoadsCrossRoads
6,1771 gold badge10 silver badges20 bronze badges
6,1771 gold badge10 silver badges20 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Probably not since spoilers are located further up the wing (leading edge) to "spoil the air" that is moving faster over the top of the wing rather than after it falls off the back of the wing hitting the air from underneath. None the less, the idea sounds logical. My glider has spoilers do to the huge amount lift the wings produce and can send you rising past 15K feet before you know it and needing O2!! The spoilers are a separate lever and lift the flaps that are centered over the middle area of the wings and give equal "spoiling" allowing the aircraft to slow down evenly without tipping the nose up or down like control surfaces on the trailing edges do.
New contributor
Bert Wonderstone is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Probably not since spoilers are located further up the wing (leading edge) to "spoil the air" that is moving faster over the top of the wing rather than after it falls off the back of the wing hitting the air from underneath. None the less, the idea sounds logical. My glider has spoilers do to the huge amount lift the wings produce and can send you rising past 15K feet before you know it and needing O2!! The spoilers are a separate lever and lift the flaps that are centered over the middle area of the wings and give equal "spoiling" allowing the aircraft to slow down evenly without tipping the nose up or down like control surfaces on the trailing edges do.
New contributor
Bert Wonderstone is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Probably not since spoilers are located further up the wing (leading edge) to "spoil the air" that is moving faster over the top of the wing rather than after it falls off the back of the wing hitting the air from underneath. None the less, the idea sounds logical. My glider has spoilers do to the huge amount lift the wings produce and can send you rising past 15K feet before you know it and needing O2!! The spoilers are a separate lever and lift the flaps that are centered over the middle area of the wings and give equal "spoiling" allowing the aircraft to slow down evenly without tipping the nose up or down like control surfaces on the trailing edges do.
New contributor
Bert Wonderstone is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
Probably not since spoilers are located further up the wing (leading edge) to "spoil the air" that is moving faster over the top of the wing rather than after it falls off the back of the wing hitting the air from underneath. None the less, the idea sounds logical. My glider has spoilers do to the huge amount lift the wings produce and can send you rising past 15K feet before you know it and needing O2!! The spoilers are a separate lever and lift the flaps that are centered over the middle area of the wings and give equal "spoiling" allowing the aircraft to slow down evenly without tipping the nose up or down like control surfaces on the trailing edges do.
New contributor
Bert Wonderstone is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 4 hours ago
FreeMan
8,11210 gold badges61 silver badges131 bronze badges
8,11210 gold badges61 silver badges131 bronze badges
New contributor
Bert Wonderstone is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 9 hours ago
Bert WonderstoneBert Wonderstone
1
1
New contributor
Bert Wonderstone is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Bert Wonderstone is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
Adel is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Adel is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Adel is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Adel is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f67246%2fcould-flaps-be-raised-upward-to-serve-as-spoilers-lift-dumpers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Welcome to Stack Exchange! I think this is a very interesting question.
$endgroup$
– Tanner Swett
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you for the welcome! This forum has tons of really great questions and information, it's a great source of brain food.
$endgroup$
– Adel
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Related: Could flaps replace spoilers by deflecting more than 90°?
$endgroup$
– ymb1
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
"simplify and lighten": the latter will certainly be true when combining functions, the former (probably) not. Recently came across an article by one of Airbus' heads of R&D, detailing their/his vision on multifunctional wing movables. Interesting read: issuu.com/maurits11/docs/00_magazine_/10.
$endgroup$
– Bram
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Pretty sure this is done on some model gliders but I don't have my copy of Simon's book handy atm.
$endgroup$
– AEhere
8 hours ago