How can I understand if an object stay (zero velocity) or moving with constant velocity (zero acceleration)How to get distance when acceleration is not constant?Physics behind Wheel SlippingFinding the force of friction of a moving object and its change when it accelerates to a constant speedCan a object with constant acceleration change its trajectory?How can an object with zero acceleration move?How to apply Newton's first law to moving object?How does a body accelerate that is put into a flow field with constant speed?How to calculate acceleration vector of a moving object to intercept a stationary objectThe mechanics of retention of velocity/acceleration when an object is dropped from a moving bodyCan an object have constant speed and tangential acceleration without undergoing circular motion?

Movie featuring a De Lorean - NOT Back to the Future

Why do people prefer metropolitan areas, considering monsters and villains?

Why am I getting unevenly-spread results when using $RANDOM?

How can I understand if an object stay (zero velocity) or moving with constant velocity (zero acceleration)

Why do Martians have to wear space helmets?

E12 LED light bulb flickers when OFF in candelabra

Was the 45.9°C temperature in France in June 2019 the highest ever recorded in France?

What was the significance of Spider-Man: Far From Home being an MCU Phase 3 film instead of a Phase 4 film?

As a supervisor, what feedback would you expect from a PhD who quits?

Array or vector? Two dimensional array or matrix?

Jimmy needs your help!

Taking my Ph.D. advisor out for dinner after graduation

Why does the Misal rico de Cisneros uses the word "Qiſſa", and what is it supposed to mean? Why not "Miſſa" (Missa)?

Uniform initialization by tuple

In layman's terms, does the Luckstone just give a passive +1 to all d20 rolls and saves except for death saves?

Four ships at the ocean with the same distance

How did the IEC decide to create kibibytes?

How to evaluate the performance of open source solver?

What exactly is a "murder hobo"?

Who goes first? Person disembarking bus or the bicycle?

Is this car delivery via Ebay Motors on Craigslist a scam?

What are the effects of abstaining from eating a certain flavor?

Is conquering your neighbors to fight a greater enemy a valid strategy?

Computer name naming convention for security



How can I understand if an object stay (zero velocity) or moving with constant velocity (zero acceleration)


How to get distance when acceleration is not constant?Physics behind Wheel SlippingFinding the force of friction of a moving object and its change when it accelerates to a constant speedCan a object with constant acceleration change its trajectory?How can an object with zero acceleration move?How to apply Newton's first law to moving object?How does a body accelerate that is put into a flow field with constant speed?How to calculate acceleration vector of a moving object to intercept a stationary objectThe mechanics of retention of velocity/acceleration when an object is dropped from a moving bodyCan an object have constant speed and tangential acceleration without undergoing circular motion?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1












$begingroup$


I thought a scenario like; lets say I am looking an object and there is nothing except this object. Is there a way to understand that if this object is stay on its position or if object moving with a constant speed and also I am moving as same constant speed with this object ? (consider there is not any friction etc.)










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There is no way to tell the difference. This is what Galilean relativity is about.
    $endgroup$
    – Stéphane Rollandin
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    If it is possible to compare clocks between constant velocity & zero velocity situations, can we say constant velocity time will lower than zero velocity time ? @StéphaneRollandin
    $endgroup$
    – Ozn Ozi
    8 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    It’s impossible. This is the principle that gave the theory of relativity its name. First noticed by Galileo in 1632 for mechanics, it was generalized by Einstein in 1905 to all physics laws.
    $endgroup$
    – J. Manuel
    7 hours ago

















1












$begingroup$


I thought a scenario like; lets say I am looking an object and there is nothing except this object. Is there a way to understand that if this object is stay on its position or if object moving with a constant speed and also I am moving as same constant speed with this object ? (consider there is not any friction etc.)










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There is no way to tell the difference. This is what Galilean relativity is about.
    $endgroup$
    – Stéphane Rollandin
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    If it is possible to compare clocks between constant velocity & zero velocity situations, can we say constant velocity time will lower than zero velocity time ? @StéphaneRollandin
    $endgroup$
    – Ozn Ozi
    8 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    It’s impossible. This is the principle that gave the theory of relativity its name. First noticed by Galileo in 1632 for mechanics, it was generalized by Einstein in 1905 to all physics laws.
    $endgroup$
    – J. Manuel
    7 hours ago













1












1








1





$begingroup$


I thought a scenario like; lets say I am looking an object and there is nothing except this object. Is there a way to understand that if this object is stay on its position or if object moving with a constant speed and also I am moving as same constant speed with this object ? (consider there is not any friction etc.)










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I thought a scenario like; lets say I am looking an object and there is nothing except this object. Is there a way to understand that if this object is stay on its position or if object moving with a constant speed and also I am moving as same constant speed with this object ? (consider there is not any friction etc.)







kinematics acceleration velocity displacement






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago









Qmechanic

111k12 gold badges211 silver badges1302 bronze badges




111k12 gold badges211 silver badges1302 bronze badges










asked 8 hours ago









Ozn OziOzn Ozi

1361 silver badge7 bronze badges




1361 silver badge7 bronze badges







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There is no way to tell the difference. This is what Galilean relativity is about.
    $endgroup$
    – Stéphane Rollandin
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    If it is possible to compare clocks between constant velocity & zero velocity situations, can we say constant velocity time will lower than zero velocity time ? @StéphaneRollandin
    $endgroup$
    – Ozn Ozi
    8 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    It’s impossible. This is the principle that gave the theory of relativity its name. First noticed by Galileo in 1632 for mechanics, it was generalized by Einstein in 1905 to all physics laws.
    $endgroup$
    – J. Manuel
    7 hours ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There is no way to tell the difference. This is what Galilean relativity is about.
    $endgroup$
    – Stéphane Rollandin
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    If it is possible to compare clocks between constant velocity & zero velocity situations, can we say constant velocity time will lower than zero velocity time ? @StéphaneRollandin
    $endgroup$
    – Ozn Ozi
    8 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    It’s impossible. This is the principle that gave the theory of relativity its name. First noticed by Galileo in 1632 for mechanics, it was generalized by Einstein in 1905 to all physics laws.
    $endgroup$
    – J. Manuel
    7 hours ago







1




1




$begingroup$
There is no way to tell the difference. This is what Galilean relativity is about.
$endgroup$
– Stéphane Rollandin
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
There is no way to tell the difference. This is what Galilean relativity is about.
$endgroup$
– Stéphane Rollandin
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
If it is possible to compare clocks between constant velocity & zero velocity situations, can we say constant velocity time will lower than zero velocity time ? @StéphaneRollandin
$endgroup$
– Ozn Ozi
8 hours ago





$begingroup$
If it is possible to compare clocks between constant velocity & zero velocity situations, can we say constant velocity time will lower than zero velocity time ? @StéphaneRollandin
$endgroup$
– Ozn Ozi
8 hours ago













$begingroup$
It’s impossible. This is the principle that gave the theory of relativity its name. First noticed by Galileo in 1632 for mechanics, it was generalized by Einstein in 1905 to all physics laws.
$endgroup$
– J. Manuel
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
It’s impossible. This is the principle that gave the theory of relativity its name. First noticed by Galileo in 1632 for mechanics, it was generalized by Einstein in 1905 to all physics laws.
$endgroup$
– J. Manuel
7 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

You cannot tell the difference. In fact many would say there is no difference. If you're really in a universe where there's nothing except the object like you say, there would be no difference between just sitting still and moving at a constant speed. There are no stars to see whizzing by, no atmosphere to make you feel the wind, nothing to make the light so you can measure redshift with special relativity.



If you're curious, this is one of the fundamental assumptions of special relativity.






share|cite|improve this answer










New contributor



Jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





$endgroup$




















    3












    $begingroup$

    Constant velocity and speed have no meaning unless you specify the frame of reference with respect to which it is measured or observed. (The only exception is the speed of light).



    If you see an object “moving”, then it is moving with respect to your frame of reference. If you see it as “still” it is still with respect to your frame of reference.



    But in the frame of reference of somebody who is with the object in a windowless compartment the object is always at rest and the person has no no way of knowing what you are seeing.



    All this assumes constant velocity.



    Hope this helps






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "151"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f489979%2fhow-can-i-understand-if-an-object-stay-zero-velocity-or-moving-with-constant-v%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1












      $begingroup$

      You cannot tell the difference. In fact many would say there is no difference. If you're really in a universe where there's nothing except the object like you say, there would be no difference between just sitting still and moving at a constant speed. There are no stars to see whizzing by, no atmosphere to make you feel the wind, nothing to make the light so you can measure redshift with special relativity.



      If you're curious, this is one of the fundamental assumptions of special relativity.






      share|cite|improve this answer










      New contributor



      Jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      $endgroup$

















        1












        $begingroup$

        You cannot tell the difference. In fact many would say there is no difference. If you're really in a universe where there's nothing except the object like you say, there would be no difference between just sitting still and moving at a constant speed. There are no stars to see whizzing by, no atmosphere to make you feel the wind, nothing to make the light so you can measure redshift with special relativity.



        If you're curious, this is one of the fundamental assumptions of special relativity.






        share|cite|improve this answer










        New contributor



        Jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        $endgroup$















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          You cannot tell the difference. In fact many would say there is no difference. If you're really in a universe where there's nothing except the object like you say, there would be no difference between just sitting still and moving at a constant speed. There are no stars to see whizzing by, no atmosphere to make you feel the wind, nothing to make the light so you can measure redshift with special relativity.



          If you're curious, this is one of the fundamental assumptions of special relativity.






          share|cite|improve this answer










          New contributor



          Jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          $endgroup$



          You cannot tell the difference. In fact many would say there is no difference. If you're really in a universe where there's nothing except the object like you say, there would be no difference between just sitting still and moving at a constant speed. There are no stars to see whizzing by, no atmosphere to make you feel the wind, nothing to make the light so you can measure redshift with special relativity.



          If you're curious, this is one of the fundamental assumptions of special relativity.







          share|cite|improve this answer










          New contributor



          Jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.








          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 2 hours ago









          xray0

          2642 silver badges14 bronze badges




          2642 silver badges14 bronze badges






          New contributor



          Jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.








          answered 8 hours ago









          JackJack

          443 bronze badges




          443 bronze badges




          New contributor



          Jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.




          New contributor




          Jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.

























              3












              $begingroup$

              Constant velocity and speed have no meaning unless you specify the frame of reference with respect to which it is measured or observed. (The only exception is the speed of light).



              If you see an object “moving”, then it is moving with respect to your frame of reference. If you see it as “still” it is still with respect to your frame of reference.



              But in the frame of reference of somebody who is with the object in a windowless compartment the object is always at rest and the person has no no way of knowing what you are seeing.



              All this assumes constant velocity.



              Hope this helps






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$

















                3












                $begingroup$

                Constant velocity and speed have no meaning unless you specify the frame of reference with respect to which it is measured or observed. (The only exception is the speed of light).



                If you see an object “moving”, then it is moving with respect to your frame of reference. If you see it as “still” it is still with respect to your frame of reference.



                But in the frame of reference of somebody who is with the object in a windowless compartment the object is always at rest and the person has no no way of knowing what you are seeing.



                All this assumes constant velocity.



                Hope this helps






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$















                  3












                  3








                  3





                  $begingroup$

                  Constant velocity and speed have no meaning unless you specify the frame of reference with respect to which it is measured or observed. (The only exception is the speed of light).



                  If you see an object “moving”, then it is moving with respect to your frame of reference. If you see it as “still” it is still with respect to your frame of reference.



                  But in the frame of reference of somebody who is with the object in a windowless compartment the object is always at rest and the person has no no way of knowing what you are seeing.



                  All this assumes constant velocity.



                  Hope this helps






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  Constant velocity and speed have no meaning unless you specify the frame of reference with respect to which it is measured or observed. (The only exception is the speed of light).



                  If you see an object “moving”, then it is moving with respect to your frame of reference. If you see it as “still” it is still with respect to your frame of reference.



                  But in the frame of reference of somebody who is with the object in a windowless compartment the object is always at rest and the person has no no way of knowing what you are seeing.



                  All this assumes constant velocity.



                  Hope this helps







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited 8 hours ago

























                  answered 8 hours ago









                  Bob DBob D

                  9,8803 gold badges9 silver badges34 bronze badges




                  9,8803 gold badges9 silver badges34 bronze badges



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f489979%2fhow-can-i-understand-if-an-object-stay-zero-velocity-or-moving-with-constant-v%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                      Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                      Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її