Does a creature have cover when moving through an ally space?Does the Linebreaker feat imply that the battlemind provokes an opportunity attack?Does moving towards an enemy with a reach weapon provoke an attack of opportunity?AoOs against the same enemy on his turn?Does moving into an opponent's square generate an Attack of Opportunity when you do so with a 5-foot step?What square do attacks of opportunity occur in — the square being moved out of or the one being enteredHow many Acrobatics checks are needed to pass through a medium creature's threatened area via its space?Does The Idea Of Threatened Squares Exist in 5e?Does moving out of multiple squares that a single opponent threatens provoke multiple attacks of opportunity?Does a ranged attack around a corner incur cover penalties?Does a creature get to choose which square it takes its Attack of Opportunity from movement on?

What do I do when a student working in my lab "ghosts" me?

How do I run a game when my PCs have different approaches to combat?

How can I prevent corporations from growing their own workforce?

Can two figures have the same area, perimeter, and same number of segments have different shape?

A planet illuminated by a black hole?

How to write a sincerely religious protagonist without preaching or affirming or judging their worldview?

Is it legal for private citizens to "impound" e-scooters?

Replacing tongue and groove floorboards: but can't find a match

Trapped in an ocean Temple in Minecraft?

Inadvertently nuked my disk permission structure - why?

Commercial jet accompanied by small plane near Seattle

The seven story archetypes. Are they truly all of them?

What is the meaning of "you has the wind of me"?

Why is a dedicated QA team member necessary?

Strange Cron Job takes up 100% of CPU Ubuntu 18 LTS Server

Is it correct to translate English noun adjuncts into adjectives?

Why did Saturn V not head straight to the moon?

How did C64 games handle music during gameplay?

Explanation for a joke about a three-legged dog that walks into a bar

Why are there not any MRI machines available in Interstellar?

"I you already know": is this proper English?

Q: What is a Checkmate Word™?

USA: Can a witness take the 5th to avoid perjury?

kids pooling money for Lego League and taxes



Does a creature have cover when moving through an ally space?


Does the Linebreaker feat imply that the battlemind provokes an opportunity attack?Does moving towards an enemy with a reach weapon provoke an attack of opportunity?AoOs against the same enemy on his turn?Does moving into an opponent's square generate an Attack of Opportunity when you do so with a 5-foot step?What square do attacks of opportunity occur in — the square being moved out of or the one being enteredHow many Acrobatics checks are needed to pass through a medium creature's threatened area via its space?Does The Idea Of Threatened Squares Exist in 5e?Does moving out of multiple squares that a single opponent threatens provoke multiple attacks of opportunity?Does a ranged attack around a corner incur cover penalties?Does a creature get to choose which square it takes its Attack of Opportunity from movement on?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








6












$begingroup$


Suppose in the following position A has a reach weapon (and is an enemy of both B and C, not sure if that changes anything). C has soft cover from A, but is also out of reach. Now, C moves closer to A - through B's square then into the empty square. Movement into the empty square would normally provoke an attack of opportunity for moving out of the square threatened via reach, but if B provides soft cover for those moving through his space, that attack cannot be taken. So. Do any rules, FAQs, etc. rule either way?



A.BC









share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    That’s a damn good question; I don’t think there’s an answer for it. Here’s hoping someone knows something I don’t!
    $endgroup$
    – KRyan
    8 hours ago

















6












$begingroup$


Suppose in the following position A has a reach weapon (and is an enemy of both B and C, not sure if that changes anything). C has soft cover from A, but is also out of reach. Now, C moves closer to A - through B's square then into the empty square. Movement into the empty square would normally provoke an attack of opportunity for moving out of the square threatened via reach, but if B provides soft cover for those moving through his space, that attack cannot be taken. So. Do any rules, FAQs, etc. rule either way?



A.BC









share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    That’s a damn good question; I don’t think there’s an answer for it. Here’s hoping someone knows something I don’t!
    $endgroup$
    – KRyan
    8 hours ago













6












6








6





$begingroup$


Suppose in the following position A has a reach weapon (and is an enemy of both B and C, not sure if that changes anything). C has soft cover from A, but is also out of reach. Now, C moves closer to A - through B's square then into the empty square. Movement into the empty square would normally provoke an attack of opportunity for moving out of the square threatened via reach, but if B provides soft cover for those moving through his space, that attack cannot be taken. So. Do any rules, FAQs, etc. rule either way?



A.BC









share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Suppose in the following position A has a reach weapon (and is an enemy of both B and C, not sure if that changes anything). C has soft cover from A, but is also out of reach. Now, C moves closer to A - through B's square then into the empty square. Movement into the empty square would normally provoke an attack of opportunity for moving out of the square threatened via reach, but if B provides soft cover for those moving through his space, that attack cannot be taken. So. Do any rules, FAQs, etc. rule either way?



A.BC






pathfinder combat opportunity-attack cover






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 8 hours ago









ShadowKras

57.3k4 gold badges83 silver badges149 bronze badges




57.3k4 gold badges83 silver badges149 bronze badges










asked 8 hours ago









Eugene RyabtsevEugene Ryabtsev

2,1069 silver badges17 bronze badges




2,1069 silver badges17 bronze badges











  • $begingroup$
    That’s a damn good question; I don’t think there’s an answer for it. Here’s hoping someone knows something I don’t!
    $endgroup$
    – KRyan
    8 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    That’s a damn good question; I don’t think there’s an answer for it. Here’s hoping someone knows something I don’t!
    $endgroup$
    – KRyan
    8 hours ago















$begingroup$
That’s a damn good question; I don’t think there’s an answer for it. Here’s hoping someone knows something I don’t!
$endgroup$
– KRyan
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
That’s a damn good question; I don’t think there’s an answer for it. Here’s hoping someone knows something I don’t!
$endgroup$
– KRyan
8 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















7












$begingroup$

On Cover says, "When making a melee attack against a target that isn’t adjacent to you (such as with a reach weapon), use the rules for determining cover from ranged attacks." That's done by doing this:




To determine whether your target has cover from your ranged attack, choose a corner of your square. If any line from this corner to any corner of the target’s square passes through a square or border that blocks line of effect or provides cover, or through a square occupied by a creature, the target has cover (+4 to AC).




Also, on Cover and Attacks of Opportunity says, "You can’t execute an attack of opportunity against an opponent with cover relative to you."



However, Moving through a Square says, "You can move through a square occupied by a friendly character, unless you are charging. When you move through a square occupied by a friendly character, that character doesn’t provide you with cover" (emphasis mine).



Thus, in the scenario described in the question, when C takes a move action to move into his ally B's square, A can't make an attack of opportunity against C because the attack of opportunity would've been provoked from the square C just left, and C has soft cover from A in that square. However, when C exits B's square (as he typically must), if C exits into a space that that A still threatens, C will provoke attacks of opportunity normally as C being in the square with B doesn't provide either of them with cover.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    True Story: In D&D 3.5 (whence this Pathfinder rule originates), the PCs at my table were taking on a conversion of The Keep on the Borderland and were happily moving through each other's squares to avoid attacks of opportunity (i.e. the Pardon Me! school of combat) until someone noticed the Player's Handbook's rules on Moving through a Square (147). The adventure suddenly got far more dangerous!
    $endgroup$
    – Hey I Can Chan
    7 hours ago














Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f152497%2fdoes-a-creature-have-cover-when-moving-through-an-ally-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









7












$begingroup$

On Cover says, "When making a melee attack against a target that isn’t adjacent to you (such as with a reach weapon), use the rules for determining cover from ranged attacks." That's done by doing this:




To determine whether your target has cover from your ranged attack, choose a corner of your square. If any line from this corner to any corner of the target’s square passes through a square or border that blocks line of effect or provides cover, or through a square occupied by a creature, the target has cover (+4 to AC).




Also, on Cover and Attacks of Opportunity says, "You can’t execute an attack of opportunity against an opponent with cover relative to you."



However, Moving through a Square says, "You can move through a square occupied by a friendly character, unless you are charging. When you move through a square occupied by a friendly character, that character doesn’t provide you with cover" (emphasis mine).



Thus, in the scenario described in the question, when C takes a move action to move into his ally B's square, A can't make an attack of opportunity against C because the attack of opportunity would've been provoked from the square C just left, and C has soft cover from A in that square. However, when C exits B's square (as he typically must), if C exits into a space that that A still threatens, C will provoke attacks of opportunity normally as C being in the square with B doesn't provide either of them with cover.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    True Story: In D&D 3.5 (whence this Pathfinder rule originates), the PCs at my table were taking on a conversion of The Keep on the Borderland and were happily moving through each other's squares to avoid attacks of opportunity (i.e. the Pardon Me! school of combat) until someone noticed the Player's Handbook's rules on Moving through a Square (147). The adventure suddenly got far more dangerous!
    $endgroup$
    – Hey I Can Chan
    7 hours ago
















7












$begingroup$

On Cover says, "When making a melee attack against a target that isn’t adjacent to you (such as with a reach weapon), use the rules for determining cover from ranged attacks." That's done by doing this:




To determine whether your target has cover from your ranged attack, choose a corner of your square. If any line from this corner to any corner of the target’s square passes through a square or border that blocks line of effect or provides cover, or through a square occupied by a creature, the target has cover (+4 to AC).




Also, on Cover and Attacks of Opportunity says, "You can’t execute an attack of opportunity against an opponent with cover relative to you."



However, Moving through a Square says, "You can move through a square occupied by a friendly character, unless you are charging. When you move through a square occupied by a friendly character, that character doesn’t provide you with cover" (emphasis mine).



Thus, in the scenario described in the question, when C takes a move action to move into his ally B's square, A can't make an attack of opportunity against C because the attack of opportunity would've been provoked from the square C just left, and C has soft cover from A in that square. However, when C exits B's square (as he typically must), if C exits into a space that that A still threatens, C will provoke attacks of opportunity normally as C being in the square with B doesn't provide either of them with cover.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    True Story: In D&D 3.5 (whence this Pathfinder rule originates), the PCs at my table were taking on a conversion of The Keep on the Borderland and were happily moving through each other's squares to avoid attacks of opportunity (i.e. the Pardon Me! school of combat) until someone noticed the Player's Handbook's rules on Moving through a Square (147). The adventure suddenly got far more dangerous!
    $endgroup$
    – Hey I Can Chan
    7 hours ago














7












7








7





$begingroup$

On Cover says, "When making a melee attack against a target that isn’t adjacent to you (such as with a reach weapon), use the rules for determining cover from ranged attacks." That's done by doing this:




To determine whether your target has cover from your ranged attack, choose a corner of your square. If any line from this corner to any corner of the target’s square passes through a square or border that blocks line of effect or provides cover, or through a square occupied by a creature, the target has cover (+4 to AC).




Also, on Cover and Attacks of Opportunity says, "You can’t execute an attack of opportunity against an opponent with cover relative to you."



However, Moving through a Square says, "You can move through a square occupied by a friendly character, unless you are charging. When you move through a square occupied by a friendly character, that character doesn’t provide you with cover" (emphasis mine).



Thus, in the scenario described in the question, when C takes a move action to move into his ally B's square, A can't make an attack of opportunity against C because the attack of opportunity would've been provoked from the square C just left, and C has soft cover from A in that square. However, when C exits B's square (as he typically must), if C exits into a space that that A still threatens, C will provoke attacks of opportunity normally as C being in the square with B doesn't provide either of them with cover.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



On Cover says, "When making a melee attack against a target that isn’t adjacent to you (such as with a reach weapon), use the rules for determining cover from ranged attacks." That's done by doing this:




To determine whether your target has cover from your ranged attack, choose a corner of your square. If any line from this corner to any corner of the target’s square passes through a square or border that blocks line of effect or provides cover, or through a square occupied by a creature, the target has cover (+4 to AC).




Also, on Cover and Attacks of Opportunity says, "You can’t execute an attack of opportunity against an opponent with cover relative to you."



However, Moving through a Square says, "You can move through a square occupied by a friendly character, unless you are charging. When you move through a square occupied by a friendly character, that character doesn’t provide you with cover" (emphasis mine).



Thus, in the scenario described in the question, when C takes a move action to move into his ally B's square, A can't make an attack of opportunity against C because the attack of opportunity would've been provoked from the square C just left, and C has soft cover from A in that square. However, when C exits B's square (as he typically must), if C exits into a space that that A still threatens, C will provoke attacks of opportunity normally as C being in the square with B doesn't provide either of them with cover.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 8 hours ago









Hey I Can ChanHey I Can Chan

153k12 gold badges279 silver badges654 bronze badges




153k12 gold badges279 silver badges654 bronze badges











  • $begingroup$
    True Story: In D&D 3.5 (whence this Pathfinder rule originates), the PCs at my table were taking on a conversion of The Keep on the Borderland and were happily moving through each other's squares to avoid attacks of opportunity (i.e. the Pardon Me! school of combat) until someone noticed the Player's Handbook's rules on Moving through a Square (147). The adventure suddenly got far more dangerous!
    $endgroup$
    – Hey I Can Chan
    7 hours ago

















  • $begingroup$
    True Story: In D&D 3.5 (whence this Pathfinder rule originates), the PCs at my table were taking on a conversion of The Keep on the Borderland and were happily moving through each other's squares to avoid attacks of opportunity (i.e. the Pardon Me! school of combat) until someone noticed the Player's Handbook's rules on Moving through a Square (147). The adventure suddenly got far more dangerous!
    $endgroup$
    – Hey I Can Chan
    7 hours ago
















$begingroup$
True Story: In D&D 3.5 (whence this Pathfinder rule originates), the PCs at my table were taking on a conversion of The Keep on the Borderland and were happily moving through each other's squares to avoid attacks of opportunity (i.e. the Pardon Me! school of combat) until someone noticed the Player's Handbook's rules on Moving through a Square (147). The adventure suddenly got far more dangerous!
$endgroup$
– Hey I Can Chan
7 hours ago





$begingroup$
True Story: In D&D 3.5 (whence this Pathfinder rule originates), the PCs at my table were taking on a conversion of The Keep on the Borderland and were happily moving through each other's squares to avoid attacks of opportunity (i.e. the Pardon Me! school of combat) until someone noticed the Player's Handbook's rules on Moving through a Square (147). The adventure suddenly got far more dangerous!
$endgroup$
– Hey I Can Chan
7 hours ago


















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f152497%2fdoes-a-creature-have-cover-when-moving-through-an-ally-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

François Viète Contents Biography Work and thought Bibliography See also Notes Further reading External links Navigation menup. 21Google Bookspp. 75–77Google BooksDe thou (from University of Saint Andrews)ArchivedGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle booksGoogle Bookscc-parthenay.frL'histoire universelle (fr)Universal History (en)ArchivedAdsabs.harvard.eduPagesperso-orange.frArchive.orgChikara Sasaki. Descartes' mathematical thought p.259Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle Bookspp. 152 and onwardGoogle BooksGoogle BooksScribd.comGoogle Books1257-7979Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGallica.bnf.frGoogle BooksGoogle Books"François Viète"Francois Viète: Father of Modern Algebraic NotationThe Lawyer and the GamblerAbout TarporleySite de Jean-Paul GuichardL'algèbre nouvelle"About the Harmonicon"cb120511976(data)1188044800000 0001 0913 5903n82164680ola2013766880073431702w6vt1sb70287374827140948071409480