USGS Relief map (GeoTIFF raster) misaligns with vector layers (QGIS)Importing a PostGIS and a Delimited Text layer in QGIS, not overlappingHow to project TIGER & WGS84 to Spherical Mercator?Problem with spatial reference system / shapefile projectionUSGS GeoTiff extent via GDALTrouble calculating areas in QGIS using field calculatorAlign vector and raster layers with D3Fixing artifacts in rendered ocean polygonsLoading NAD83 and WGS84 layers together in QGIS?CRS problem after raster reproject via QGIS WarpProjecting NLCD data as WGS84 using QGIS?

How can I make 12 tone and atonal melodies sound interesting?

Who won a Game of Bar Dice?

Does the new finding on "reversing a quantum jump mid-flight" rule out any interpretations of QM?

Are polynomials with the same roots identical?

Can I utilise a baking stone to make crepes?

What should I write in an apology letter, since I have decided not to join a company after accepting an offer letter

Is using 'echo' to display attacker-controlled data on the terminal dangerous?

AMPScript SMS InsertDE() function not working in SMS

USGS Relief map (GeoTIFF raster) misaligns with vector layers (QGIS)

What is the purpose of bonds within an investment portfolio?

Printing Pascal’s triangle for n number of rows in Python

How to safely destroy (a large quantity of) valid checks?

Next date with distinct digits

Why can I traceroute to this IP address, but not ping?

I've been given a project I can't complete, what should I do?

Why am I getting a strange double quote (“) in Open Office instead of the ordinary one (")?

Is there a set of positive integers of density 1 which contains no infinite arithmetic progression?

How can I use String in enum for Apex?

I have a problematic assistant manager, but I can't fire him

Is it possible to have 2 different but equal size real number sets that have the same mean and standard deviation?

What does 思ってやっている mean?

Which is the better way to call a method that is only available to one class that implements an interface but not the other one?

Ability To Change Root User Password (Vulnerability?)

Why does this query, missing a FROM clause, not error out?



USGS Relief map (GeoTIFF raster) misaligns with vector layers (QGIS)


Importing a PostGIS and a Delimited Text layer in QGIS, not overlappingHow to project TIGER & WGS84 to Spherical Mercator?Problem with spatial reference system / shapefile projectionUSGS GeoTiff extent via GDALTrouble calculating areas in QGIS using field calculatorAlign vector and raster layers with D3Fixing artifacts in rendered ocean polygonsLoading NAD83 and WGS84 layers together in QGIS?CRS problem after raster reproject via QGIS WarpProjecting NLCD data as WGS84 using QGIS?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1















I'm trying to correct the alignment of three layers (described below), but I'm not entirely sure how to go about re-projecting raster layers to my other layers. Ultimately my goal is to clip the relief map to the park boundaries, to look similar to Grossenbacher's map. There are some park boundaries to remove/exclude, but I first want to make sure everything is aligned.



The main thing that is confusing me is the many different projections of my layers, and which one to choose as the main projection. As well as correctly re-projecting the raster layer.



enter image description hereenter image description here



Layer 1 (brown, TIGER census tracts)



  • CRS: EPSG:4269 - NAD83 - Geographic


  • Source: https://www2.census.gov/geo/tiger/TGRGDB16/


Layer 2 (yellow, National Park boundaries)



  • CRS: EPSG:3857 - WGS 84 / Pseudo-Mercator - Projected


  • Source: https://public-nps.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/national-park-service-park-unit-boundaries


Layer 3 (gray, USGS Relief map [Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution])



  • CRS: Generated CRS (+proj=laea +lat_0=45 +lon_0=-100 +x_0=0 +y_0=0 +datum=NAD83 +units=m +no_defs) - Projected


  • Source: https://nationalmap.gov/small_scale/atlasftp.html#srgy48i










share|improve this question
























  • The main CRS of your map doesn't matter for this purpose. As long as the CRS of each layer is correctly assigned, QGIS can display them so that they line up. This feature is called "on-the-fly reprojection; in QGIS 3 it happens automatically, and in earlier versions you could turn it on and off through project properties menu. If you have OTF reprojection turned on, the problem might be that one or more layers has an incorrect CRS. The most common cause would be if you (incorrectly) changed one of the layer's CRS through the layer properties. Or maybe the "generated CRS" is incorrect.

    – csk
    7 hours ago











  • If you did change the CRS (in the layer property) of any of these layers, remove that layer from your map and add it back in. This will hopefully reset the layer back to its intended CRS. Also, look up the metadata / layer description of the relief map and see what CRS it's supposed to be in. Then see if you can find a pre-loaded CRS to use for that layer.

    – csk
    7 hours ago











  • And can you provide links to the original source data? You can use the edit link under your question to add them.

    – csk
    7 hours ago











  • I remove/added all the layers without making any changes in the CRS, but I'm still getting same results. Also, didn't find anything in the metadata of the relief map. Anything else I can do?

    – James R.
    7 hours ago











  • "The Grayscale United States Shaded Relief – 200 Meter Resolution map layer is available in both a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection and an Albers Conical Equal-Area projection." It looks like you have the Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection version. Try setting the CRS (in the layer properties) to a CRS in the "Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area" section of the CRS selector. EPSG:2163 (US National Atlas Equal Area) sounds like a reasonable one to try.

    – csk
    7 hours ago

















1















I'm trying to correct the alignment of three layers (described below), but I'm not entirely sure how to go about re-projecting raster layers to my other layers. Ultimately my goal is to clip the relief map to the park boundaries, to look similar to Grossenbacher's map. There are some park boundaries to remove/exclude, but I first want to make sure everything is aligned.



The main thing that is confusing me is the many different projections of my layers, and which one to choose as the main projection. As well as correctly re-projecting the raster layer.



enter image description hereenter image description here



Layer 1 (brown, TIGER census tracts)



  • CRS: EPSG:4269 - NAD83 - Geographic


  • Source: https://www2.census.gov/geo/tiger/TGRGDB16/


Layer 2 (yellow, National Park boundaries)



  • CRS: EPSG:3857 - WGS 84 / Pseudo-Mercator - Projected


  • Source: https://public-nps.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/national-park-service-park-unit-boundaries


Layer 3 (gray, USGS Relief map [Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution])



  • CRS: Generated CRS (+proj=laea +lat_0=45 +lon_0=-100 +x_0=0 +y_0=0 +datum=NAD83 +units=m +no_defs) - Projected


  • Source: https://nationalmap.gov/small_scale/atlasftp.html#srgy48i










share|improve this question
























  • The main CRS of your map doesn't matter for this purpose. As long as the CRS of each layer is correctly assigned, QGIS can display them so that they line up. This feature is called "on-the-fly reprojection; in QGIS 3 it happens automatically, and in earlier versions you could turn it on and off through project properties menu. If you have OTF reprojection turned on, the problem might be that one or more layers has an incorrect CRS. The most common cause would be if you (incorrectly) changed one of the layer's CRS through the layer properties. Or maybe the "generated CRS" is incorrect.

    – csk
    7 hours ago











  • If you did change the CRS (in the layer property) of any of these layers, remove that layer from your map and add it back in. This will hopefully reset the layer back to its intended CRS. Also, look up the metadata / layer description of the relief map and see what CRS it's supposed to be in. Then see if you can find a pre-loaded CRS to use for that layer.

    – csk
    7 hours ago











  • And can you provide links to the original source data? You can use the edit link under your question to add them.

    – csk
    7 hours ago











  • I remove/added all the layers without making any changes in the CRS, but I'm still getting same results. Also, didn't find anything in the metadata of the relief map. Anything else I can do?

    – James R.
    7 hours ago











  • "The Grayscale United States Shaded Relief – 200 Meter Resolution map layer is available in both a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection and an Albers Conical Equal-Area projection." It looks like you have the Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection version. Try setting the CRS (in the layer properties) to a CRS in the "Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area" section of the CRS selector. EPSG:2163 (US National Atlas Equal Area) sounds like a reasonable one to try.

    – csk
    7 hours ago













1












1








1








I'm trying to correct the alignment of three layers (described below), but I'm not entirely sure how to go about re-projecting raster layers to my other layers. Ultimately my goal is to clip the relief map to the park boundaries, to look similar to Grossenbacher's map. There are some park boundaries to remove/exclude, but I first want to make sure everything is aligned.



The main thing that is confusing me is the many different projections of my layers, and which one to choose as the main projection. As well as correctly re-projecting the raster layer.



enter image description hereenter image description here



Layer 1 (brown, TIGER census tracts)



  • CRS: EPSG:4269 - NAD83 - Geographic


  • Source: https://www2.census.gov/geo/tiger/TGRGDB16/


Layer 2 (yellow, National Park boundaries)



  • CRS: EPSG:3857 - WGS 84 / Pseudo-Mercator - Projected


  • Source: https://public-nps.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/national-park-service-park-unit-boundaries


Layer 3 (gray, USGS Relief map [Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution])



  • CRS: Generated CRS (+proj=laea +lat_0=45 +lon_0=-100 +x_0=0 +y_0=0 +datum=NAD83 +units=m +no_defs) - Projected


  • Source: https://nationalmap.gov/small_scale/atlasftp.html#srgy48i










share|improve this question
















I'm trying to correct the alignment of three layers (described below), but I'm not entirely sure how to go about re-projecting raster layers to my other layers. Ultimately my goal is to clip the relief map to the park boundaries, to look similar to Grossenbacher's map. There are some park boundaries to remove/exclude, but I first want to make sure everything is aligned.



The main thing that is confusing me is the many different projections of my layers, and which one to choose as the main projection. As well as correctly re-projecting the raster layer.



enter image description hereenter image description here



Layer 1 (brown, TIGER census tracts)



  • CRS: EPSG:4269 - NAD83 - Geographic


  • Source: https://www2.census.gov/geo/tiger/TGRGDB16/


Layer 2 (yellow, National Park boundaries)



  • CRS: EPSG:3857 - WGS 84 / Pseudo-Mercator - Projected


  • Source: https://public-nps.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/national-park-service-park-unit-boundaries


Layer 3 (gray, USGS Relief map [Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution])



  • CRS: Generated CRS (+proj=laea +lat_0=45 +lon_0=-100 +x_0=0 +y_0=0 +datum=NAD83 +units=m +no_defs) - Projected


  • Source: https://nationalmap.gov/small_scale/atlasftp.html#srgy48i







qgis raster coordinate-system






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 6 hours ago







James R.

















asked 8 hours ago









James R.James R.

135




135












  • The main CRS of your map doesn't matter for this purpose. As long as the CRS of each layer is correctly assigned, QGIS can display them so that they line up. This feature is called "on-the-fly reprojection; in QGIS 3 it happens automatically, and in earlier versions you could turn it on and off through project properties menu. If you have OTF reprojection turned on, the problem might be that one or more layers has an incorrect CRS. The most common cause would be if you (incorrectly) changed one of the layer's CRS through the layer properties. Or maybe the "generated CRS" is incorrect.

    – csk
    7 hours ago











  • If you did change the CRS (in the layer property) of any of these layers, remove that layer from your map and add it back in. This will hopefully reset the layer back to its intended CRS. Also, look up the metadata / layer description of the relief map and see what CRS it's supposed to be in. Then see if you can find a pre-loaded CRS to use for that layer.

    – csk
    7 hours ago











  • And can you provide links to the original source data? You can use the edit link under your question to add them.

    – csk
    7 hours ago











  • I remove/added all the layers without making any changes in the CRS, but I'm still getting same results. Also, didn't find anything in the metadata of the relief map. Anything else I can do?

    – James R.
    7 hours ago











  • "The Grayscale United States Shaded Relief – 200 Meter Resolution map layer is available in both a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection and an Albers Conical Equal-Area projection." It looks like you have the Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection version. Try setting the CRS (in the layer properties) to a CRS in the "Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area" section of the CRS selector. EPSG:2163 (US National Atlas Equal Area) sounds like a reasonable one to try.

    – csk
    7 hours ago

















  • The main CRS of your map doesn't matter for this purpose. As long as the CRS of each layer is correctly assigned, QGIS can display them so that they line up. This feature is called "on-the-fly reprojection; in QGIS 3 it happens automatically, and in earlier versions you could turn it on and off through project properties menu. If you have OTF reprojection turned on, the problem might be that one or more layers has an incorrect CRS. The most common cause would be if you (incorrectly) changed one of the layer's CRS through the layer properties. Or maybe the "generated CRS" is incorrect.

    – csk
    7 hours ago











  • If you did change the CRS (in the layer property) of any of these layers, remove that layer from your map and add it back in. This will hopefully reset the layer back to its intended CRS. Also, look up the metadata / layer description of the relief map and see what CRS it's supposed to be in. Then see if you can find a pre-loaded CRS to use for that layer.

    – csk
    7 hours ago











  • And can you provide links to the original source data? You can use the edit link under your question to add them.

    – csk
    7 hours ago











  • I remove/added all the layers without making any changes in the CRS, but I'm still getting same results. Also, didn't find anything in the metadata of the relief map. Anything else I can do?

    – James R.
    7 hours ago











  • "The Grayscale United States Shaded Relief – 200 Meter Resolution map layer is available in both a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection and an Albers Conical Equal-Area projection." It looks like you have the Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection version. Try setting the CRS (in the layer properties) to a CRS in the "Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area" section of the CRS selector. EPSG:2163 (US National Atlas Equal Area) sounds like a reasonable one to try.

    – csk
    7 hours ago
















The main CRS of your map doesn't matter for this purpose. As long as the CRS of each layer is correctly assigned, QGIS can display them so that they line up. This feature is called "on-the-fly reprojection; in QGIS 3 it happens automatically, and in earlier versions you could turn it on and off through project properties menu. If you have OTF reprojection turned on, the problem might be that one or more layers has an incorrect CRS. The most common cause would be if you (incorrectly) changed one of the layer's CRS through the layer properties. Or maybe the "generated CRS" is incorrect.

– csk
7 hours ago





The main CRS of your map doesn't matter for this purpose. As long as the CRS of each layer is correctly assigned, QGIS can display them so that they line up. This feature is called "on-the-fly reprojection; in QGIS 3 it happens automatically, and in earlier versions you could turn it on and off through project properties menu. If you have OTF reprojection turned on, the problem might be that one or more layers has an incorrect CRS. The most common cause would be if you (incorrectly) changed one of the layer's CRS through the layer properties. Or maybe the "generated CRS" is incorrect.

– csk
7 hours ago













If you did change the CRS (in the layer property) of any of these layers, remove that layer from your map and add it back in. This will hopefully reset the layer back to its intended CRS. Also, look up the metadata / layer description of the relief map and see what CRS it's supposed to be in. Then see if you can find a pre-loaded CRS to use for that layer.

– csk
7 hours ago





If you did change the CRS (in the layer property) of any of these layers, remove that layer from your map and add it back in. This will hopefully reset the layer back to its intended CRS. Also, look up the metadata / layer description of the relief map and see what CRS it's supposed to be in. Then see if you can find a pre-loaded CRS to use for that layer.

– csk
7 hours ago













And can you provide links to the original source data? You can use the edit link under your question to add them.

– csk
7 hours ago





And can you provide links to the original source data? You can use the edit link under your question to add them.

– csk
7 hours ago













I remove/added all the layers without making any changes in the CRS, but I'm still getting same results. Also, didn't find anything in the metadata of the relief map. Anything else I can do?

– James R.
7 hours ago





I remove/added all the layers without making any changes in the CRS, but I'm still getting same results. Also, didn't find anything in the metadata of the relief map. Anything else I can do?

– James R.
7 hours ago













"The Grayscale United States Shaded Relief – 200 Meter Resolution map layer is available in both a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection and an Albers Conical Equal-Area projection." It looks like you have the Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection version. Try setting the CRS (in the layer properties) to a CRS in the "Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area" section of the CRS selector. EPSG:2163 (US National Atlas Equal Area) sounds like a reasonable one to try.

– csk
7 hours ago





"The Grayscale United States Shaded Relief – 200 Meter Resolution map layer is available in both a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection and an Albers Conical Equal-Area projection." It looks like you have the Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection version. Try setting the CRS (in the layer properties) to a CRS in the "Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area" section of the CRS selector. EPSG:2163 (US National Atlas Equal Area) sounds like a reasonable one to try.

– csk
7 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3














From the screenshot, it's clear that this is a projection issue. The layers all have sufficient detail, that their misalignment cannot be due to low resolution. Also, they are offset by varying amounts in different places. So, to fix this issue we have to figure out the cause of the projection issue. Here are the various things to check:



  1. If using a version of QGIS older than 3.0, make sure on-the-fly reprojection is turned on. This feature allows you to have layers in different CRS's displayed on the same map. QGIS displays them projected into the same CRS, without any need to change the source data. In QGIS 3.0 and later, on-the-fly reprojection is always on.



  2. Once we know that you have OTF reprojection turned on (or are using QGIS 3.0 or later), the most likely cause is that one or more layers has an incorrect CRS.



    • The most common cause of an incorrect CRS would be if you (incorrectly) changed one of the layer's CRS through the layer properties. If you did change the CRS (in the layer property) of any of these layers, remove that layer from your map and add it back in. This will hopefully reset the layer back to its intended CRS.


    • Another possible cause is that the layer did not automatically load with the correct CRS. To fix this, look up the metadata / layer description of the relief map and see what CRS it's supposed to be in. Then try to find a pre-loaded CRS to use for that layer. Change the CRS of the layer in the layer properties to the correct CRS. You may need to make a few guesses, and try a few different CRS's until you find the right one.



In this case, the most likely culprit is the Relief map layer (full name: Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution), because it's in a "generated CRS." Always be suspicious of a layer that automatically loads in a "generated CRS."



The Relief layer doesn't have any helpful information in the metadata or layer properties. However, if we go to the source website, at the very bottom of the page is the information we need:




The Grayscale United States Shaded Relief – 200 Meter Resolution map layer is available in both a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection and an Albers Conical Equal-Area projection.




Now we know this layer is either in a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection or an Albers Conical Equal-Area projection.



On this page, we can see a list of all the related layers. There are layers called



  • "Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution" and

  • "Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution Albers Projection"

Obviously the one with "Albers Projection" in the name is in an Albers projection, so by process of elimination we can assume that our layer is in Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection.



So now we go into the layer properties and change the CRS to a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection. In the CRS selector window, in the section called "Coordinate Reference Systems of the World, scroll down until you find the section called "Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area." (Don't be enticed by "Lambert Conformal Conic.")



enter image description here



QGIS has 21 options for Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projections, but fortunately only one of them sounds remotely reasonable for this area of interest: US National Atlas Equal Area EPSG:2163



Notes:



  • If there's more than one reasonable-sounding CRS, try them all, and use the one that makes the layer correctly align with the other layers.

  • This method depends on having at least one layer that you know is correctly aligned. If you're not sure that any of your layers is in the correct CRS, then you can't use them for comparison. Instead, use the QuickMapServices plugin to obtain a basemap such as Open Street Map.





share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "79"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgis.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f325192%2fusgs-relief-map-geotiff-raster-misaligns-with-vector-layers-qgis%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3














    From the screenshot, it's clear that this is a projection issue. The layers all have sufficient detail, that their misalignment cannot be due to low resolution. Also, they are offset by varying amounts in different places. So, to fix this issue we have to figure out the cause of the projection issue. Here are the various things to check:



    1. If using a version of QGIS older than 3.0, make sure on-the-fly reprojection is turned on. This feature allows you to have layers in different CRS's displayed on the same map. QGIS displays them projected into the same CRS, without any need to change the source data. In QGIS 3.0 and later, on-the-fly reprojection is always on.



    2. Once we know that you have OTF reprojection turned on (or are using QGIS 3.0 or later), the most likely cause is that one or more layers has an incorrect CRS.



      • The most common cause of an incorrect CRS would be if you (incorrectly) changed one of the layer's CRS through the layer properties. If you did change the CRS (in the layer property) of any of these layers, remove that layer from your map and add it back in. This will hopefully reset the layer back to its intended CRS.


      • Another possible cause is that the layer did not automatically load with the correct CRS. To fix this, look up the metadata / layer description of the relief map and see what CRS it's supposed to be in. Then try to find a pre-loaded CRS to use for that layer. Change the CRS of the layer in the layer properties to the correct CRS. You may need to make a few guesses, and try a few different CRS's until you find the right one.



    In this case, the most likely culprit is the Relief map layer (full name: Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution), because it's in a "generated CRS." Always be suspicious of a layer that automatically loads in a "generated CRS."



    The Relief layer doesn't have any helpful information in the metadata or layer properties. However, if we go to the source website, at the very bottom of the page is the information we need:




    The Grayscale United States Shaded Relief – 200 Meter Resolution map layer is available in both a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection and an Albers Conical Equal-Area projection.




    Now we know this layer is either in a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection or an Albers Conical Equal-Area projection.



    On this page, we can see a list of all the related layers. There are layers called



    • "Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution" and

    • "Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution Albers Projection"

    Obviously the one with "Albers Projection" in the name is in an Albers projection, so by process of elimination we can assume that our layer is in Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection.



    So now we go into the layer properties and change the CRS to a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection. In the CRS selector window, in the section called "Coordinate Reference Systems of the World, scroll down until you find the section called "Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area." (Don't be enticed by "Lambert Conformal Conic.")



    enter image description here



    QGIS has 21 options for Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projections, but fortunately only one of them sounds remotely reasonable for this area of interest: US National Atlas Equal Area EPSG:2163



    Notes:



    • If there's more than one reasonable-sounding CRS, try them all, and use the one that makes the layer correctly align with the other layers.

    • This method depends on having at least one layer that you know is correctly aligned. If you're not sure that any of your layers is in the correct CRS, then you can't use them for comparison. Instead, use the QuickMapServices plugin to obtain a basemap such as Open Street Map.





    share|improve this answer



























      3














      From the screenshot, it's clear that this is a projection issue. The layers all have sufficient detail, that their misalignment cannot be due to low resolution. Also, they are offset by varying amounts in different places. So, to fix this issue we have to figure out the cause of the projection issue. Here are the various things to check:



      1. If using a version of QGIS older than 3.0, make sure on-the-fly reprojection is turned on. This feature allows you to have layers in different CRS's displayed on the same map. QGIS displays them projected into the same CRS, without any need to change the source data. In QGIS 3.0 and later, on-the-fly reprojection is always on.



      2. Once we know that you have OTF reprojection turned on (or are using QGIS 3.0 or later), the most likely cause is that one or more layers has an incorrect CRS.



        • The most common cause of an incorrect CRS would be if you (incorrectly) changed one of the layer's CRS through the layer properties. If you did change the CRS (in the layer property) of any of these layers, remove that layer from your map and add it back in. This will hopefully reset the layer back to its intended CRS.


        • Another possible cause is that the layer did not automatically load with the correct CRS. To fix this, look up the metadata / layer description of the relief map and see what CRS it's supposed to be in. Then try to find a pre-loaded CRS to use for that layer. Change the CRS of the layer in the layer properties to the correct CRS. You may need to make a few guesses, and try a few different CRS's until you find the right one.



      In this case, the most likely culprit is the Relief map layer (full name: Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution), because it's in a "generated CRS." Always be suspicious of a layer that automatically loads in a "generated CRS."



      The Relief layer doesn't have any helpful information in the metadata or layer properties. However, if we go to the source website, at the very bottom of the page is the information we need:




      The Grayscale United States Shaded Relief – 200 Meter Resolution map layer is available in both a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection and an Albers Conical Equal-Area projection.




      Now we know this layer is either in a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection or an Albers Conical Equal-Area projection.



      On this page, we can see a list of all the related layers. There are layers called



      • "Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution" and

      • "Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution Albers Projection"

      Obviously the one with "Albers Projection" in the name is in an Albers projection, so by process of elimination we can assume that our layer is in Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection.



      So now we go into the layer properties and change the CRS to a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection. In the CRS selector window, in the section called "Coordinate Reference Systems of the World, scroll down until you find the section called "Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area." (Don't be enticed by "Lambert Conformal Conic.")



      enter image description here



      QGIS has 21 options for Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projections, but fortunately only one of them sounds remotely reasonable for this area of interest: US National Atlas Equal Area EPSG:2163



      Notes:



      • If there's more than one reasonable-sounding CRS, try them all, and use the one that makes the layer correctly align with the other layers.

      • This method depends on having at least one layer that you know is correctly aligned. If you're not sure that any of your layers is in the correct CRS, then you can't use them for comparison. Instead, use the QuickMapServices plugin to obtain a basemap such as Open Street Map.





      share|improve this answer

























        3












        3








        3







        From the screenshot, it's clear that this is a projection issue. The layers all have sufficient detail, that their misalignment cannot be due to low resolution. Also, they are offset by varying amounts in different places. So, to fix this issue we have to figure out the cause of the projection issue. Here are the various things to check:



        1. If using a version of QGIS older than 3.0, make sure on-the-fly reprojection is turned on. This feature allows you to have layers in different CRS's displayed on the same map. QGIS displays them projected into the same CRS, without any need to change the source data. In QGIS 3.0 and later, on-the-fly reprojection is always on.



        2. Once we know that you have OTF reprojection turned on (or are using QGIS 3.0 or later), the most likely cause is that one or more layers has an incorrect CRS.



          • The most common cause of an incorrect CRS would be if you (incorrectly) changed one of the layer's CRS through the layer properties. If you did change the CRS (in the layer property) of any of these layers, remove that layer from your map and add it back in. This will hopefully reset the layer back to its intended CRS.


          • Another possible cause is that the layer did not automatically load with the correct CRS. To fix this, look up the metadata / layer description of the relief map and see what CRS it's supposed to be in. Then try to find a pre-loaded CRS to use for that layer. Change the CRS of the layer in the layer properties to the correct CRS. You may need to make a few guesses, and try a few different CRS's until you find the right one.



        In this case, the most likely culprit is the Relief map layer (full name: Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution), because it's in a "generated CRS." Always be suspicious of a layer that automatically loads in a "generated CRS."



        The Relief layer doesn't have any helpful information in the metadata or layer properties. However, if we go to the source website, at the very bottom of the page is the information we need:




        The Grayscale United States Shaded Relief – 200 Meter Resolution map layer is available in both a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection and an Albers Conical Equal-Area projection.




        Now we know this layer is either in a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection or an Albers Conical Equal-Area projection.



        On this page, we can see a list of all the related layers. There are layers called



        • "Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution" and

        • "Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution Albers Projection"

        Obviously the one with "Albers Projection" in the name is in an Albers projection, so by process of elimination we can assume that our layer is in Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection.



        So now we go into the layer properties and change the CRS to a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection. In the CRS selector window, in the section called "Coordinate Reference Systems of the World, scroll down until you find the section called "Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area." (Don't be enticed by "Lambert Conformal Conic.")



        enter image description here



        QGIS has 21 options for Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projections, but fortunately only one of them sounds remotely reasonable for this area of interest: US National Atlas Equal Area EPSG:2163



        Notes:



        • If there's more than one reasonable-sounding CRS, try them all, and use the one that makes the layer correctly align with the other layers.

        • This method depends on having at least one layer that you know is correctly aligned. If you're not sure that any of your layers is in the correct CRS, then you can't use them for comparison. Instead, use the QuickMapServices plugin to obtain a basemap such as Open Street Map.





        share|improve this answer













        From the screenshot, it's clear that this is a projection issue. The layers all have sufficient detail, that their misalignment cannot be due to low resolution. Also, they are offset by varying amounts in different places. So, to fix this issue we have to figure out the cause of the projection issue. Here are the various things to check:



        1. If using a version of QGIS older than 3.0, make sure on-the-fly reprojection is turned on. This feature allows you to have layers in different CRS's displayed on the same map. QGIS displays them projected into the same CRS, without any need to change the source data. In QGIS 3.0 and later, on-the-fly reprojection is always on.



        2. Once we know that you have OTF reprojection turned on (or are using QGIS 3.0 or later), the most likely cause is that one or more layers has an incorrect CRS.



          • The most common cause of an incorrect CRS would be if you (incorrectly) changed one of the layer's CRS through the layer properties. If you did change the CRS (in the layer property) of any of these layers, remove that layer from your map and add it back in. This will hopefully reset the layer back to its intended CRS.


          • Another possible cause is that the layer did not automatically load with the correct CRS. To fix this, look up the metadata / layer description of the relief map and see what CRS it's supposed to be in. Then try to find a pre-loaded CRS to use for that layer. Change the CRS of the layer in the layer properties to the correct CRS. You may need to make a few guesses, and try a few different CRS's until you find the right one.



        In this case, the most likely culprit is the Relief map layer (full name: Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution), because it's in a "generated CRS." Always be suspicious of a layer that automatically loads in a "generated CRS."



        The Relief layer doesn't have any helpful information in the metadata or layer properties. However, if we go to the source website, at the very bottom of the page is the information we need:




        The Grayscale United States Shaded Relief – 200 Meter Resolution map layer is available in both a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection and an Albers Conical Equal-Area projection.




        Now we know this layer is either in a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection or an Albers Conical Equal-Area projection.



        On this page, we can see a list of all the related layers. There are layers called



        • "Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution" and

        • "Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution Albers Projection"

        Obviously the one with "Albers Projection" in the name is in an Albers projection, so by process of elimination we can assume that our layer is in Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection.



        So now we go into the layer properties and change the CRS to a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection. In the CRS selector window, in the section called "Coordinate Reference Systems of the World, scroll down until you find the section called "Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area." (Don't be enticed by "Lambert Conformal Conic.")



        enter image description here



        QGIS has 21 options for Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projections, but fortunately only one of them sounds remotely reasonable for this area of interest: US National Atlas Equal Area EPSG:2163



        Notes:



        • If there's more than one reasonable-sounding CRS, try them all, and use the one that makes the layer correctly align with the other layers.

        • This method depends on having at least one layer that you know is correctly aligned. If you're not sure that any of your layers is in the correct CRS, then you can't use them for comparison. Instead, use the QuickMapServices plugin to obtain a basemap such as Open Street Map.






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 6 hours ago









        cskcsk

        11.8k1337




        11.8k1337



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Geographic Information Systems Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgis.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f325192%2fusgs-relief-map-geotiff-raster-misaligns-with-vector-layers-qgis%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її