Solve Riddle With AlgebraCan someone please explain the catch behind this question?How do I solve two equations in two unknowns?Generalization of a certain riddle and ultrafilters (?)Determining how many sibling a person hasCounting Siblings Word Problem: Linear Algebra SystemsWhich of these two methods provides the correct answer for this probability riddle?Riddle to solve. Grouping of integers.Translate riddle to math“A Queer Coincidence,” riddle from Dudeney's bookCounting siblings problem

Origin of "boor"

Fermat's statement about the ancients: How serious was he?

How to trick the reader into thinking they're following a redshirt instead of the protagonist?

Bb13b9 confusion

Someone whose aspirations exceed abilities or means

Understanding "Current Draw" in terms of "Ohm's Law"

If there's something that implicates the president why is there then a national security issue? (John Dowd)

Increase speed altering column on large table to NON NULL

A word that means "blending into a community too much"

Which languages would be most useful in Europe at the end of the 19th century?

Is this a bug in plotting step functions?

Who won a Game of Bar Dice?

Printing Pascal’s triangle for n number of rows in Python

With Ubuntu 18.04, how can I have a hot corner that locks the computer?

PDF vs. PNG figure: why does figure load so much faster even if file sizes are the same?

Why Does Mama Coco Look Old After Going to the Other World?

What would be the way to say "just saying" in German? (Not the literal translation)

Can the removal of a duty-free sales trolley result in a measurable reduction in emissions?

Russian word for a male zebra

What should I write in an apology letter, since I have decided not to join a company after accepting an offer letter

How to hide rifle during medieval town entrance inspection?

Does putting salt first make it easier for attacker to bruteforce the hash?

Should I put programming books I wrote a few years ago on my resume?

Why does this query, missing a FROM clause, not error out?



Solve Riddle With Algebra


Can someone please explain the catch behind this question?How do I solve two equations in two unknowns?Generalization of a certain riddle and ultrafilters (?)Determining how many sibling a person hasCounting Siblings Word Problem: Linear Algebra SystemsWhich of these two methods provides the correct answer for this probability riddle?Riddle to solve. Grouping of integers.Translate riddle to math“A Queer Coincidence,” riddle from Dudeney's bookCounting siblings problem













4












$begingroup$


There is a riddle and I believe it can be solved by algebra - please assist




A boy has as many sisters as brothers, but each sister has only half as many sisters as brothers. How many brothers and sisters are there in the family




Here is algebra, but I am stuck



$b=brother$



$s=sister$



$t=total$




boy has as many brothers as sisters




$b + b + s = t$




each sister has only half as many sisters as brothers




$s + s + b = t$



$s + frac1b + b = t$



Hence



$b + b + s = s + frac1b + b$



$2b + s = s + frac3b2$



$2b = frac3b2$



$4b = 3b$



Please assist.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Better to choose variables for the number of boys and girls. Remember that a boy has one fewer brother than a girl has.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    A boy (who is one of the brothers) has as many brothers as sisters. So we know $total= boys + girls$ and we know $boys = girls + 1$. Each sister has half as many sisters as brothers. So one sister, could have 1 sister and 2 brothers, or 2 sisters and 4 brothers, etc. but only 2 sister and 4 brothers fits with the previous. So there are 3 girls and 4 boys
    $endgroup$
    – Benedict W. J. Irwin
    8 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    better to write better description of variables. "b=brothers" and "t=total" mean nothing. "Let $b$ be the number of brothers X has" (where you need to specify X too) is a much better description of what you are trying to do so you and anyone reading your work is less likely to be confused.
    $endgroup$
    – user10354138
    8 hours ago















4












$begingroup$


There is a riddle and I believe it can be solved by algebra - please assist




A boy has as many sisters as brothers, but each sister has only half as many sisters as brothers. How many brothers and sisters are there in the family




Here is algebra, but I am stuck



$b=brother$



$s=sister$



$t=total$




boy has as many brothers as sisters




$b + b + s = t$




each sister has only half as many sisters as brothers




$s + s + b = t$



$s + frac1b + b = t$



Hence



$b + b + s = s + frac1b + b$



$2b + s = s + frac3b2$



$2b = frac3b2$



$4b = 3b$



Please assist.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Better to choose variables for the number of boys and girls. Remember that a boy has one fewer brother than a girl has.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    A boy (who is one of the brothers) has as many brothers as sisters. So we know $total= boys + girls$ and we know $boys = girls + 1$. Each sister has half as many sisters as brothers. So one sister, could have 1 sister and 2 brothers, or 2 sisters and 4 brothers, etc. but only 2 sister and 4 brothers fits with the previous. So there are 3 girls and 4 boys
    $endgroup$
    – Benedict W. J. Irwin
    8 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    better to write better description of variables. "b=brothers" and "t=total" mean nothing. "Let $b$ be the number of brothers X has" (where you need to specify X too) is a much better description of what you are trying to do so you and anyone reading your work is less likely to be confused.
    $endgroup$
    – user10354138
    8 hours ago













4












4








4





$begingroup$


There is a riddle and I believe it can be solved by algebra - please assist




A boy has as many sisters as brothers, but each sister has only half as many sisters as brothers. How many brothers and sisters are there in the family




Here is algebra, but I am stuck



$b=brother$



$s=sister$



$t=total$




boy has as many brothers as sisters




$b + b + s = t$




each sister has only half as many sisters as brothers




$s + s + b = t$



$s + frac1b + b = t$



Hence



$b + b + s = s + frac1b + b$



$2b + s = s + frac3b2$



$2b = frac3b2$



$4b = 3b$



Please assist.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




There is a riddle and I believe it can be solved by algebra - please assist




A boy has as many sisters as brothers, but each sister has only half as many sisters as brothers. How many brothers and sisters are there in the family




Here is algebra, but I am stuck



$b=brother$



$s=sister$



$t=total$




boy has as many brothers as sisters




$b + b + s = t$




each sister has only half as many sisters as brothers




$s + s + b = t$



$s + frac1b + b = t$



Hence



$b + b + s = s + frac1b + b$



$2b + s = s + frac3b2$



$2b = frac3b2$



$4b = 3b$



Please assist.







algebra-precalculus puzzle word-problem






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 8 hours ago









J. W. Tanner

7,6341722




7,6341722










asked 8 hours ago









MariumMarium

1523




1523







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Better to choose variables for the number of boys and girls. Remember that a boy has one fewer brother than a girl has.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    A boy (who is one of the brothers) has as many brothers as sisters. So we know $total= boys + girls$ and we know $boys = girls + 1$. Each sister has half as many sisters as brothers. So one sister, could have 1 sister and 2 brothers, or 2 sisters and 4 brothers, etc. but only 2 sister and 4 brothers fits with the previous. So there are 3 girls and 4 boys
    $endgroup$
    – Benedict W. J. Irwin
    8 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    better to write better description of variables. "b=brothers" and "t=total" mean nothing. "Let $b$ be the number of brothers X has" (where you need to specify X too) is a much better description of what you are trying to do so you and anyone reading your work is less likely to be confused.
    $endgroup$
    – user10354138
    8 hours ago












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Better to choose variables for the number of boys and girls. Remember that a boy has one fewer brother than a girl has.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    A boy (who is one of the brothers) has as many brothers as sisters. So we know $total= boys + girls$ and we know $boys = girls + 1$. Each sister has half as many sisters as brothers. So one sister, could have 1 sister and 2 brothers, or 2 sisters and 4 brothers, etc. but only 2 sister and 4 brothers fits with the previous. So there are 3 girls and 4 boys
    $endgroup$
    – Benedict W. J. Irwin
    8 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    better to write better description of variables. "b=brothers" and "t=total" mean nothing. "Let $b$ be the number of brothers X has" (where you need to specify X too) is a much better description of what you are trying to do so you and anyone reading your work is less likely to be confused.
    $endgroup$
    – user10354138
    8 hours ago







2




2




$begingroup$
Better to choose variables for the number of boys and girls. Remember that a boy has one fewer brother than a girl has.
$endgroup$
– lulu
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
Better to choose variables for the number of boys and girls. Remember that a boy has one fewer brother than a girl has.
$endgroup$
– lulu
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
A boy (who is one of the brothers) has as many brothers as sisters. So we know $total= boys + girls$ and we know $boys = girls + 1$. Each sister has half as many sisters as brothers. So one sister, could have 1 sister and 2 brothers, or 2 sisters and 4 brothers, etc. but only 2 sister and 4 brothers fits with the previous. So there are 3 girls and 4 boys
$endgroup$
– Benedict W. J. Irwin
8 hours ago





$begingroup$
A boy (who is one of the brothers) has as many brothers as sisters. So we know $total= boys + girls$ and we know $boys = girls + 1$. Each sister has half as many sisters as brothers. So one sister, could have 1 sister and 2 brothers, or 2 sisters and 4 brothers, etc. but only 2 sister and 4 brothers fits with the previous. So there are 3 girls and 4 boys
$endgroup$
– Benedict W. J. Irwin
8 hours ago













$begingroup$
better to write better description of variables. "b=brothers" and "t=total" mean nothing. "Let $b$ be the number of brothers X has" (where you need to specify X too) is a much better description of what you are trying to do so you and anyone reading your work is less likely to be confused.
$endgroup$
– user10354138
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
better to write better description of variables. "b=brothers" and "t=total" mean nothing. "Let $b$ be the number of brothers X has" (where you need to specify X too) is a much better description of what you are trying to do so you and anyone reading your work is less likely to be confused.
$endgroup$
– user10354138
8 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

$b$ = number of boys = number of brothers each girl has



$g$ = number of girls = number of sisters each boy has



$b-1$ = number of brothers each boy has



$g-1$ = number of sisters each girl has



$$b-1 = g, qquad (textEquation 1)$$



$$g-1 = dfracb2, qquad (textEquation 2)$$



Plugging in for $g=b-1$ into the second equation:



$$b-1-1 = dfracb2 Longrightarrow b=4, g=3$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Yet you are missing a solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Marc van Leeuwen
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Am I though? It depends on how you read the OP's question. The "missing" solution is not an algebraic one. It requires an understanding of logic and set theory. The OP did not explicitly ask for all solutions. The OP asked for a solution derived algebraically.
    $endgroup$
    – InterstellarProbe
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    A solution is a solution, it exists independently of any derivation. And besides, one is always using logic to derive the algebraic conditions from the stated facts before solving them. In doing so, one cannot just assume that something that has to be true for every girl is actually instantiated at least once; that is just bad deduction.
    $endgroup$
    – Marc van Leeuwen
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @MarcvanLeeuwen Agree to disagree?
    $endgroup$
    – InterstellarProbe
    5 hours ago



















4












$begingroup$

Although this is probably not intentional, this problem has two different solutions. If you assume there are $s>0$ sisters, the boy also has $s$ brothers making $s+1$ boys in all. Each boy being a brother of any of the girls, each having $s-1$ sisters, the equation $s+1=2(s-1)$ easily solves to $s=3$ (four boys and three girls in all).



However, the question does not say that $sneq0$; the boy need not have any sisters. In that case each of the sisters has (whatever) is true; there aren't any sisters so that is vacuously true. So $s=0$ is another solution: a family with one boy and no girls. Technically, in this case there are no brothers and sisters at all in the family (which is what the question was asking), as the one child that is there is neither a sister nor a brother. Actually, nowadays this is the more likely solution, I would think.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    2












    $begingroup$

    The problem is you're using $b$ for the number of the boy's brothers and also for the number of the girl's brothers.



    Instead say there are $b$ boys and $g$ girls. Then a boy has $b-1$ brothers, so $$g=b-1.$$Similarly $$g-1=b/2.$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      There is another solution.
      $endgroup$
      – Marc van Leeuwen
      8 hours ago


















    1












    $begingroup$

    I think it'd be easiest to do



    $b = $ number of boys



    $g = $ number of girls and the essential insight is to notice:



    A boy has $b-1$ brothers and $g$ sisters, and a girl has $b$ brother and $g-1$ sisters.



    So "A boy has as many sisters as brothers" means $b-1 = g$.



    And "each sister has only half as many sisters as brothers" means $ g-1 = frac 12 b$



    So solve the two equations two unknowns:



    $b-1 = g$



    $g-1 =frac 12 b$



    ......



    If you want to use variables for brothers and sisters you can do



    $b_b = $ number of brothers a boy has



    $b_g = $ number of brothers a girl has



    $s_b = $ number of sisters a boy has and



    $s_g = $ number of sisters a girl has.



    Then our riddle is $b_b = s_b$ and $s_g = frac 12 b_s$.



    But to solve it we need to not the unstated but essential a girl has $1$ fewer sister than a boy, and a boy has one fewer brother than a girl. So



    $b_b = b_g -1$ and $s_g = s_b - 1$.



    So solve the four equations four unknowns



    $b_b = s_b$



    $s_g = frac 12b_s$



    $b_b = b_s -1$



    $s_g = s_b - 1$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Your notation is not clear. You state $b_b=b_g-1$ and then below that, you have $b_b=b_g$. This implies $0=-1$, a contradiction.
      $endgroup$
      – InterstellarProbe
      7 hours ago












    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3254382%2fsolve-riddle-with-algebra%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4












    $begingroup$

    $b$ = number of boys = number of brothers each girl has



    $g$ = number of girls = number of sisters each boy has



    $b-1$ = number of brothers each boy has



    $g-1$ = number of sisters each girl has



    $$b-1 = g, qquad (textEquation 1)$$



    $$g-1 = dfracb2, qquad (textEquation 2)$$



    Plugging in for $g=b-1$ into the second equation:



    $$b-1-1 = dfracb2 Longrightarrow b=4, g=3$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Yet you are missing a solution.
      $endgroup$
      – Marc van Leeuwen
      8 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Am I though? It depends on how you read the OP's question. The "missing" solution is not an algebraic one. It requires an understanding of logic and set theory. The OP did not explicitly ask for all solutions. The OP asked for a solution derived algebraically.
      $endgroup$
      – InterstellarProbe
      7 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      A solution is a solution, it exists independently of any derivation. And besides, one is always using logic to derive the algebraic conditions from the stated facts before solving them. In doing so, one cannot just assume that something that has to be true for every girl is actually instantiated at least once; that is just bad deduction.
      $endgroup$
      – Marc van Leeuwen
      5 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @MarcvanLeeuwen Agree to disagree?
      $endgroup$
      – InterstellarProbe
      5 hours ago
















    4












    $begingroup$

    $b$ = number of boys = number of brothers each girl has



    $g$ = number of girls = number of sisters each boy has



    $b-1$ = number of brothers each boy has



    $g-1$ = number of sisters each girl has



    $$b-1 = g, qquad (textEquation 1)$$



    $$g-1 = dfracb2, qquad (textEquation 2)$$



    Plugging in for $g=b-1$ into the second equation:



    $$b-1-1 = dfracb2 Longrightarrow b=4, g=3$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Yet you are missing a solution.
      $endgroup$
      – Marc van Leeuwen
      8 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Am I though? It depends on how you read the OP's question. The "missing" solution is not an algebraic one. It requires an understanding of logic and set theory. The OP did not explicitly ask for all solutions. The OP asked for a solution derived algebraically.
      $endgroup$
      – InterstellarProbe
      7 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      A solution is a solution, it exists independently of any derivation. And besides, one is always using logic to derive the algebraic conditions from the stated facts before solving them. In doing so, one cannot just assume that something that has to be true for every girl is actually instantiated at least once; that is just bad deduction.
      $endgroup$
      – Marc van Leeuwen
      5 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @MarcvanLeeuwen Agree to disagree?
      $endgroup$
      – InterstellarProbe
      5 hours ago














    4












    4








    4





    $begingroup$

    $b$ = number of boys = number of brothers each girl has



    $g$ = number of girls = number of sisters each boy has



    $b-1$ = number of brothers each boy has



    $g-1$ = number of sisters each girl has



    $$b-1 = g, qquad (textEquation 1)$$



    $$g-1 = dfracb2, qquad (textEquation 2)$$



    Plugging in for $g=b-1$ into the second equation:



    $$b-1-1 = dfracb2 Longrightarrow b=4, g=3$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    $b$ = number of boys = number of brothers each girl has



    $g$ = number of girls = number of sisters each boy has



    $b-1$ = number of brothers each boy has



    $g-1$ = number of sisters each girl has



    $$b-1 = g, qquad (textEquation 1)$$



    $$g-1 = dfracb2, qquad (textEquation 2)$$



    Plugging in for $g=b-1$ into the second equation:



    $$b-1-1 = dfracb2 Longrightarrow b=4, g=3$$







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered 8 hours ago









    InterstellarProbeInterstellarProbe

    4,450931




    4,450931











    • $begingroup$
      Yet you are missing a solution.
      $endgroup$
      – Marc van Leeuwen
      8 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Am I though? It depends on how you read the OP's question. The "missing" solution is not an algebraic one. It requires an understanding of logic and set theory. The OP did not explicitly ask for all solutions. The OP asked for a solution derived algebraically.
      $endgroup$
      – InterstellarProbe
      7 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      A solution is a solution, it exists independently of any derivation. And besides, one is always using logic to derive the algebraic conditions from the stated facts before solving them. In doing so, one cannot just assume that something that has to be true for every girl is actually instantiated at least once; that is just bad deduction.
      $endgroup$
      – Marc van Leeuwen
      5 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @MarcvanLeeuwen Agree to disagree?
      $endgroup$
      – InterstellarProbe
      5 hours ago

















    • $begingroup$
      Yet you are missing a solution.
      $endgroup$
      – Marc van Leeuwen
      8 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Am I though? It depends on how you read the OP's question. The "missing" solution is not an algebraic one. It requires an understanding of logic and set theory. The OP did not explicitly ask for all solutions. The OP asked for a solution derived algebraically.
      $endgroup$
      – InterstellarProbe
      7 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      A solution is a solution, it exists independently of any derivation. And besides, one is always using logic to derive the algebraic conditions from the stated facts before solving them. In doing so, one cannot just assume that something that has to be true for every girl is actually instantiated at least once; that is just bad deduction.
      $endgroup$
      – Marc van Leeuwen
      5 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @MarcvanLeeuwen Agree to disagree?
      $endgroup$
      – InterstellarProbe
      5 hours ago
















    $begingroup$
    Yet you are missing a solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Marc van Leeuwen
    8 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Yet you are missing a solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Marc van Leeuwen
    8 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    Am I though? It depends on how you read the OP's question. The "missing" solution is not an algebraic one. It requires an understanding of logic and set theory. The OP did not explicitly ask for all solutions. The OP asked for a solution derived algebraically.
    $endgroup$
    – InterstellarProbe
    7 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Am I though? It depends on how you read the OP's question. The "missing" solution is not an algebraic one. It requires an understanding of logic and set theory. The OP did not explicitly ask for all solutions. The OP asked for a solution derived algebraically.
    $endgroup$
    – InterstellarProbe
    7 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    A solution is a solution, it exists independently of any derivation. And besides, one is always using logic to derive the algebraic conditions from the stated facts before solving them. In doing so, one cannot just assume that something that has to be true for every girl is actually instantiated at least once; that is just bad deduction.
    $endgroup$
    – Marc van Leeuwen
    5 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    A solution is a solution, it exists independently of any derivation. And besides, one is always using logic to derive the algebraic conditions from the stated facts before solving them. In doing so, one cannot just assume that something that has to be true for every girl is actually instantiated at least once; that is just bad deduction.
    $endgroup$
    – Marc van Leeuwen
    5 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    @MarcvanLeeuwen Agree to disagree?
    $endgroup$
    – InterstellarProbe
    5 hours ago





    $begingroup$
    @MarcvanLeeuwen Agree to disagree?
    $endgroup$
    – InterstellarProbe
    5 hours ago












    4












    $begingroup$

    Although this is probably not intentional, this problem has two different solutions. If you assume there are $s>0$ sisters, the boy also has $s$ brothers making $s+1$ boys in all. Each boy being a brother of any of the girls, each having $s-1$ sisters, the equation $s+1=2(s-1)$ easily solves to $s=3$ (four boys and three girls in all).



    However, the question does not say that $sneq0$; the boy need not have any sisters. In that case each of the sisters has (whatever) is true; there aren't any sisters so that is vacuously true. So $s=0$ is another solution: a family with one boy and no girls. Technically, in this case there are no brothers and sisters at all in the family (which is what the question was asking), as the one child that is there is neither a sister nor a brother. Actually, nowadays this is the more likely solution, I would think.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      4












      $begingroup$

      Although this is probably not intentional, this problem has two different solutions. If you assume there are $s>0$ sisters, the boy also has $s$ brothers making $s+1$ boys in all. Each boy being a brother of any of the girls, each having $s-1$ sisters, the equation $s+1=2(s-1)$ easily solves to $s=3$ (four boys and three girls in all).



      However, the question does not say that $sneq0$; the boy need not have any sisters. In that case each of the sisters has (whatever) is true; there aren't any sisters so that is vacuously true. So $s=0$ is another solution: a family with one boy and no girls. Technically, in this case there are no brothers and sisters at all in the family (which is what the question was asking), as the one child that is there is neither a sister nor a brother. Actually, nowadays this is the more likely solution, I would think.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        Although this is probably not intentional, this problem has two different solutions. If you assume there are $s>0$ sisters, the boy also has $s$ brothers making $s+1$ boys in all. Each boy being a brother of any of the girls, each having $s-1$ sisters, the equation $s+1=2(s-1)$ easily solves to $s=3$ (four boys and three girls in all).



        However, the question does not say that $sneq0$; the boy need not have any sisters. In that case each of the sisters has (whatever) is true; there aren't any sisters so that is vacuously true. So $s=0$ is another solution: a family with one boy and no girls. Technically, in this case there are no brothers and sisters at all in the family (which is what the question was asking), as the one child that is there is neither a sister nor a brother. Actually, nowadays this is the more likely solution, I would think.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Although this is probably not intentional, this problem has two different solutions. If you assume there are $s>0$ sisters, the boy also has $s$ brothers making $s+1$ boys in all. Each boy being a brother of any of the girls, each having $s-1$ sisters, the equation $s+1=2(s-1)$ easily solves to $s=3$ (four boys and three girls in all).



        However, the question does not say that $sneq0$; the boy need not have any sisters. In that case each of the sisters has (whatever) is true; there aren't any sisters so that is vacuously true. So $s=0$ is another solution: a family with one boy and no girls. Technically, in this case there are no brothers and sisters at all in the family (which is what the question was asking), as the one child that is there is neither a sister nor a brother. Actually, nowadays this is the more likely solution, I would think.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 8 hours ago

























        answered 8 hours ago









        Marc van LeeuwenMarc van Leeuwen

        90k6112235




        90k6112235





















            2












            $begingroup$

            The problem is you're using $b$ for the number of the boy's brothers and also for the number of the girl's brothers.



            Instead say there are $b$ boys and $g$ girls. Then a boy has $b-1$ brothers, so $$g=b-1.$$Similarly $$g-1=b/2.$$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              There is another solution.
              $endgroup$
              – Marc van Leeuwen
              8 hours ago















            2












            $begingroup$

            The problem is you're using $b$ for the number of the boy's brothers and also for the number of the girl's brothers.



            Instead say there are $b$ boys and $g$ girls. Then a boy has $b-1$ brothers, so $$g=b-1.$$Similarly $$g-1=b/2.$$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              There is another solution.
              $endgroup$
              – Marc van Leeuwen
              8 hours ago













            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            The problem is you're using $b$ for the number of the boy's brothers and also for the number of the girl's brothers.



            Instead say there are $b$ boys and $g$ girls. Then a boy has $b-1$ brothers, so $$g=b-1.$$Similarly $$g-1=b/2.$$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            The problem is you're using $b$ for the number of the boy's brothers and also for the number of the girl's brothers.



            Instead say there are $b$ boys and $g$ girls. Then a boy has $b-1$ brothers, so $$g=b-1.$$Similarly $$g-1=b/2.$$







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 8 hours ago









            David C. UllrichDavid C. Ullrich

            63k44298




            63k44298







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              There is another solution.
              $endgroup$
              – Marc van Leeuwen
              8 hours ago












            • 1




              $begingroup$
              There is another solution.
              $endgroup$
              – Marc van Leeuwen
              8 hours ago







            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            There is another solution.
            $endgroup$
            – Marc van Leeuwen
            8 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            There is another solution.
            $endgroup$
            – Marc van Leeuwen
            8 hours ago











            1












            $begingroup$

            I think it'd be easiest to do



            $b = $ number of boys



            $g = $ number of girls and the essential insight is to notice:



            A boy has $b-1$ brothers and $g$ sisters, and a girl has $b$ brother and $g-1$ sisters.



            So "A boy has as many sisters as brothers" means $b-1 = g$.



            And "each sister has only half as many sisters as brothers" means $ g-1 = frac 12 b$



            So solve the two equations two unknowns:



            $b-1 = g$



            $g-1 =frac 12 b$



            ......



            If you want to use variables for brothers and sisters you can do



            $b_b = $ number of brothers a boy has



            $b_g = $ number of brothers a girl has



            $s_b = $ number of sisters a boy has and



            $s_g = $ number of sisters a girl has.



            Then our riddle is $b_b = s_b$ and $s_g = frac 12 b_s$.



            But to solve it we need to not the unstated but essential a girl has $1$ fewer sister than a boy, and a boy has one fewer brother than a girl. So



            $b_b = b_g -1$ and $s_g = s_b - 1$.



            So solve the four equations four unknowns



            $b_b = s_b$



            $s_g = frac 12b_s$



            $b_b = b_s -1$



            $s_g = s_b - 1$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Your notation is not clear. You state $b_b=b_g-1$ and then below that, you have $b_b=b_g$. This implies $0=-1$, a contradiction.
              $endgroup$
              – InterstellarProbe
              7 hours ago
















            1












            $begingroup$

            I think it'd be easiest to do



            $b = $ number of boys



            $g = $ number of girls and the essential insight is to notice:



            A boy has $b-1$ brothers and $g$ sisters, and a girl has $b$ brother and $g-1$ sisters.



            So "A boy has as many sisters as brothers" means $b-1 = g$.



            And "each sister has only half as many sisters as brothers" means $ g-1 = frac 12 b$



            So solve the two equations two unknowns:



            $b-1 = g$



            $g-1 =frac 12 b$



            ......



            If you want to use variables for brothers and sisters you can do



            $b_b = $ number of brothers a boy has



            $b_g = $ number of brothers a girl has



            $s_b = $ number of sisters a boy has and



            $s_g = $ number of sisters a girl has.



            Then our riddle is $b_b = s_b$ and $s_g = frac 12 b_s$.



            But to solve it we need to not the unstated but essential a girl has $1$ fewer sister than a boy, and a boy has one fewer brother than a girl. So



            $b_b = b_g -1$ and $s_g = s_b - 1$.



            So solve the four equations four unknowns



            $b_b = s_b$



            $s_g = frac 12b_s$



            $b_b = b_s -1$



            $s_g = s_b - 1$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Your notation is not clear. You state $b_b=b_g-1$ and then below that, you have $b_b=b_g$. This implies $0=-1$, a contradiction.
              $endgroup$
              – InterstellarProbe
              7 hours ago














            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            I think it'd be easiest to do



            $b = $ number of boys



            $g = $ number of girls and the essential insight is to notice:



            A boy has $b-1$ brothers and $g$ sisters, and a girl has $b$ brother and $g-1$ sisters.



            So "A boy has as many sisters as brothers" means $b-1 = g$.



            And "each sister has only half as many sisters as brothers" means $ g-1 = frac 12 b$



            So solve the two equations two unknowns:



            $b-1 = g$



            $g-1 =frac 12 b$



            ......



            If you want to use variables for brothers and sisters you can do



            $b_b = $ number of brothers a boy has



            $b_g = $ number of brothers a girl has



            $s_b = $ number of sisters a boy has and



            $s_g = $ number of sisters a girl has.



            Then our riddle is $b_b = s_b$ and $s_g = frac 12 b_s$.



            But to solve it we need to not the unstated but essential a girl has $1$ fewer sister than a boy, and a boy has one fewer brother than a girl. So



            $b_b = b_g -1$ and $s_g = s_b - 1$.



            So solve the four equations four unknowns



            $b_b = s_b$



            $s_g = frac 12b_s$



            $b_b = b_s -1$



            $s_g = s_b - 1$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            I think it'd be easiest to do



            $b = $ number of boys



            $g = $ number of girls and the essential insight is to notice:



            A boy has $b-1$ brothers and $g$ sisters, and a girl has $b$ brother and $g-1$ sisters.



            So "A boy has as many sisters as brothers" means $b-1 = g$.



            And "each sister has only half as many sisters as brothers" means $ g-1 = frac 12 b$



            So solve the two equations two unknowns:



            $b-1 = g$



            $g-1 =frac 12 b$



            ......



            If you want to use variables for brothers and sisters you can do



            $b_b = $ number of brothers a boy has



            $b_g = $ number of brothers a girl has



            $s_b = $ number of sisters a boy has and



            $s_g = $ number of sisters a girl has.



            Then our riddle is $b_b = s_b$ and $s_g = frac 12 b_s$.



            But to solve it we need to not the unstated but essential a girl has $1$ fewer sister than a boy, and a boy has one fewer brother than a girl. So



            $b_b = b_g -1$ and $s_g = s_b - 1$.



            So solve the four equations four unknowns



            $b_b = s_b$



            $s_g = frac 12b_s$



            $b_b = b_s -1$



            $s_g = s_b - 1$.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 5 hours ago

























            answered 8 hours ago









            fleabloodfleablood

            74.3k22892




            74.3k22892







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Your notation is not clear. You state $b_b=b_g-1$ and then below that, you have $b_b=b_g$. This implies $0=-1$, a contradiction.
              $endgroup$
              – InterstellarProbe
              7 hours ago













            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Your notation is not clear. You state $b_b=b_g-1$ and then below that, you have $b_b=b_g$. This implies $0=-1$, a contradiction.
              $endgroup$
              – InterstellarProbe
              7 hours ago








            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            Your notation is not clear. You state $b_b=b_g-1$ and then below that, you have $b_b=b_g$. This implies $0=-1$, a contradiction.
            $endgroup$
            – InterstellarProbe
            7 hours ago





            $begingroup$
            Your notation is not clear. You state $b_b=b_g-1$ and then below that, you have $b_b=b_g$. This implies $0=-1$, a contradiction.
            $endgroup$
            – InterstellarProbe
            7 hours ago


















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3254382%2fsolve-riddle-with-algebra%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її