Importance of the principal bundle in Chern-Simons theoryAnalog of “Spin” Chern-Simons TheoryThe Chern-Simons/Wess-Zumino-Witten correspondence Choice of framing in Gravitational Chern Simonstertiary characteristic class: integration of the Chern-Simons formDefine the 3d Chern-Simons TQFT on a discrete simplicial complexHow is Chern-Simons theory related to Floer homology?Chern-Simons theory with non-compact gauge groups GChern-Simons and framing dependence$.$The existence of the extension of a non-trivial line bundleWhat is variation of the Chern-Simons functional, and why can it be calculated as follows?

Importance of the principal bundle in Chern-Simons theory


Analog of “Spin” Chern-Simons TheoryThe Chern-Simons/Wess-Zumino-Witten correspondence Choice of framing in Gravitational Chern Simonstertiary characteristic class: integration of the Chern-Simons formDefine the 3d Chern-Simons TQFT on a discrete simplicial complexHow is Chern-Simons theory related to Floer homology?Chern-Simons theory with non-compact gauge groups GChern-Simons and framing dependence$.$The existence of the extension of a non-trivial line bundleWhat is variation of the Chern-Simons functional, and why can it be calculated as follows?













4












$begingroup$


This is a very basic beginners question about Chern-Simons theory. The configurations that we sum over to get the partition function are given by a Lie-algebra valued 1-form $A$ on a topological 3-manifold, called the connection. More precisely, $A$ is a connection of a principal Lie-group bundle over the manifold.



What is the role of this principal bundle?



I didn't find this spelled out explicitly anywhere, but I assume one does not sum over different choices of principle bundles when calculating the partition function? Or are different choices of principle bundle already encoded in different choices of $A$?



So is Chern-Simons theory not only a topological field theory that one can put on any topological manifold, but one that we can additionally put on any topological manifold with a Lie-group principle bundle? Can one restrict to trivial principle bundles without loosing any of the physical interpretation? If one talks about the "3-manifold invariants" of the Chern-Simons theory, does that refer to the partition function on the trivial principle bundle over those manifolds? Or is the partition function independent of the choice of bundle?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Dan Freed: arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9206021
    $endgroup$
    – AHusain
    7 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    One thing to remember is that a principal $G$-bundle on a 3-manifold is trivializable when $G$ is connected and simply-connected. So, the partition function where you restrict to the trivial $G$-bundle is simply the partition function of Chern--Simons for the universal cover of $G$.
    $endgroup$
    – Pavel Safronov
    6 hours ago















4












$begingroup$


This is a very basic beginners question about Chern-Simons theory. The configurations that we sum over to get the partition function are given by a Lie-algebra valued 1-form $A$ on a topological 3-manifold, called the connection. More precisely, $A$ is a connection of a principal Lie-group bundle over the manifold.



What is the role of this principal bundle?



I didn't find this spelled out explicitly anywhere, but I assume one does not sum over different choices of principle bundles when calculating the partition function? Or are different choices of principle bundle already encoded in different choices of $A$?



So is Chern-Simons theory not only a topological field theory that one can put on any topological manifold, but one that we can additionally put on any topological manifold with a Lie-group principle bundle? Can one restrict to trivial principle bundles without loosing any of the physical interpretation? If one talks about the "3-manifold invariants" of the Chern-Simons theory, does that refer to the partition function on the trivial principle bundle over those manifolds? Or is the partition function independent of the choice of bundle?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Dan Freed: arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9206021
    $endgroup$
    – AHusain
    7 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    One thing to remember is that a principal $G$-bundle on a 3-manifold is trivializable when $G$ is connected and simply-connected. So, the partition function where you restrict to the trivial $G$-bundle is simply the partition function of Chern--Simons for the universal cover of $G$.
    $endgroup$
    – Pavel Safronov
    6 hours ago













4












4








4


1



$begingroup$


This is a very basic beginners question about Chern-Simons theory. The configurations that we sum over to get the partition function are given by a Lie-algebra valued 1-form $A$ on a topological 3-manifold, called the connection. More precisely, $A$ is a connection of a principal Lie-group bundle over the manifold.



What is the role of this principal bundle?



I didn't find this spelled out explicitly anywhere, but I assume one does not sum over different choices of principle bundles when calculating the partition function? Or are different choices of principle bundle already encoded in different choices of $A$?



So is Chern-Simons theory not only a topological field theory that one can put on any topological manifold, but one that we can additionally put on any topological manifold with a Lie-group principle bundle? Can one restrict to trivial principle bundles without loosing any of the physical interpretation? If one talks about the "3-manifold invariants" of the Chern-Simons theory, does that refer to the partition function on the trivial principle bundle over those manifolds? Or is the partition function independent of the choice of bundle?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




This is a very basic beginners question about Chern-Simons theory. The configurations that we sum over to get the partition function are given by a Lie-algebra valued 1-form $A$ on a topological 3-manifold, called the connection. More precisely, $A$ is a connection of a principal Lie-group bundle over the manifold.



What is the role of this principal bundle?



I didn't find this spelled out explicitly anywhere, but I assume one does not sum over different choices of principle bundles when calculating the partition function? Or are different choices of principle bundle already encoded in different choices of $A$?



So is Chern-Simons theory not only a topological field theory that one can put on any topological manifold, but one that we can additionally put on any topological manifold with a Lie-group principle bundle? Can one restrict to trivial principle bundles without loosing any of the physical interpretation? If one talks about the "3-manifold invariants" of the Chern-Simons theory, does that refer to the partition function on the trivial principle bundle over those manifolds? Or is the partition function independent of the choice of bundle?







mp.mathematical-physics tqft physics chern-simons-theory






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 8 hours ago









Andi BauerAndi Bauer

5091 silver badge9 bronze badges




5091 silver badge9 bronze badges











  • $begingroup$
    Dan Freed: arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9206021
    $endgroup$
    – AHusain
    7 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    One thing to remember is that a principal $G$-bundle on a 3-manifold is trivializable when $G$ is connected and simply-connected. So, the partition function where you restrict to the trivial $G$-bundle is simply the partition function of Chern--Simons for the universal cover of $G$.
    $endgroup$
    – Pavel Safronov
    6 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Dan Freed: arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9206021
    $endgroup$
    – AHusain
    7 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    One thing to remember is that a principal $G$-bundle on a 3-manifold is trivializable when $G$ is connected and simply-connected. So, the partition function where you restrict to the trivial $G$-bundle is simply the partition function of Chern--Simons for the universal cover of $G$.
    $endgroup$
    – Pavel Safronov
    6 hours ago















$begingroup$
Dan Freed: arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9206021
$endgroup$
– AHusain
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
Dan Freed: arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9206021
$endgroup$
– AHusain
7 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
One thing to remember is that a principal $G$-bundle on a 3-manifold is trivializable when $G$ is connected and simply-connected. So, the partition function where you restrict to the trivial $G$-bundle is simply the partition function of Chern--Simons for the universal cover of $G$.
$endgroup$
– Pavel Safronov
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
One thing to remember is that a principal $G$-bundle on a 3-manifold is trivializable when $G$ is connected and simply-connected. So, the partition function where you restrict to the trivial $G$-bundle is simply the partition function of Chern--Simons for the universal cover of $G$.
$endgroup$
– Pavel Safronov
6 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

In quantum Chern-Simons theory with gauge group $G$ (compact Lie), a field on a 3-manifold $M$ is a principal $G$-bundle with a connection $A$. The partition function/path integral associated to $M$ is supposed to be the integral over the (generally infinite-dimensional) space ("stack") $mathcalF$ of all principal $G$-bundles $P$ over $M$ equipped with a choice of connection $A$ (modulo gauge equivalence) of $exp(iS(A))$, where $S$ is the classical Chern-Simons action.



Perhaps it is easier for pedagogical purposes to explore the simpler case of Chern-Simons theory when $G$ is finite; this is Dijkgraaf-Witten theory. In this case, one can make the notion of an integral over $mathcalF$ perfectly rigorous. If $G$ is finite, then each bundle has a unique connection, so $mathcalF$ is precisely $[M, BG]$, where $BG$ is the classifying space of $G$. The Lie algebra of $G$ is also trivial, so the action vanishes, and we're left with integrating (summing) $1$ over the space $[M,BG]$ with respect to some measure; the weight of a principal $G$-bundle $P$ in this case is $1/|mathrmAut(P)|$. In other words, the finite-group version of the Chern-Simons partition function is
$$Z(M) = sum_Pin [M,BG] frac1mathrmAut(P).$$



This is the literal analogue of Chern-Simons theory for a finite gauge group; however, a more interesting analogue is twisted Dijkgraaf-Witten theory, which might be what you were trying to get at. Recall that the action associated to the field $(P,A)$ over $M$ is $S(A) = int_M q(A)$; what matters is that the integrand $q(A)$ is a $3$-form. Since a Chern-Simons field on $M$ is a principal $G$-bundle with a choice of connection $A$, one might attempt to "canonically" associate to each principal $G$-bundle a $3$-form on $M$ in the finite group case; this $3$-form would be the replacement of $A$. Note that in this story, $A$ plays a somewhat different role.



Think of the $3$-form as a singular cochain on $M$, so integration is pairing the cochain with the fundamental class of the manifold $M$ (assume it's closed and oriented). Since a field on our manifold is still a principal $G$-bundle, determined by a map $f_P:Mto BG$, we can associate to each bundle a $3$-dimensional cohomology class if we fix a choice of $alphain mathrmH^3(BG;mathbfC^times)$; then, the $3$-form "$q(A)$" associated to $P$ is $f_P^ast(alpha)in mathrmH^3(M;mathbfC^times)$. (Really, one should fix a $3$-cocycle in $Z^3(BG;mathbfC^times)$.) The action associated to $P$ is then $langle [M], f_P^ast(alpha)rangle$, and to obtain the quantum theory, one can now integrate over the space of all $G$-bundles (with the same measure as the untwisted case). Note that $A$ by itself doesn't appear in this story; only the analogue of the associated $3$-form does.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "504"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f334510%2fimportance-of-the-principal-bundle-in-chern-simons-theory%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5












    $begingroup$

    In quantum Chern-Simons theory with gauge group $G$ (compact Lie), a field on a 3-manifold $M$ is a principal $G$-bundle with a connection $A$. The partition function/path integral associated to $M$ is supposed to be the integral over the (generally infinite-dimensional) space ("stack") $mathcalF$ of all principal $G$-bundles $P$ over $M$ equipped with a choice of connection $A$ (modulo gauge equivalence) of $exp(iS(A))$, where $S$ is the classical Chern-Simons action.



    Perhaps it is easier for pedagogical purposes to explore the simpler case of Chern-Simons theory when $G$ is finite; this is Dijkgraaf-Witten theory. In this case, one can make the notion of an integral over $mathcalF$ perfectly rigorous. If $G$ is finite, then each bundle has a unique connection, so $mathcalF$ is precisely $[M, BG]$, where $BG$ is the classifying space of $G$. The Lie algebra of $G$ is also trivial, so the action vanishes, and we're left with integrating (summing) $1$ over the space $[M,BG]$ with respect to some measure; the weight of a principal $G$-bundle $P$ in this case is $1/|mathrmAut(P)|$. In other words, the finite-group version of the Chern-Simons partition function is
    $$Z(M) = sum_Pin [M,BG] frac1mathrmAut(P).$$



    This is the literal analogue of Chern-Simons theory for a finite gauge group; however, a more interesting analogue is twisted Dijkgraaf-Witten theory, which might be what you were trying to get at. Recall that the action associated to the field $(P,A)$ over $M$ is $S(A) = int_M q(A)$; what matters is that the integrand $q(A)$ is a $3$-form. Since a Chern-Simons field on $M$ is a principal $G$-bundle with a choice of connection $A$, one might attempt to "canonically" associate to each principal $G$-bundle a $3$-form on $M$ in the finite group case; this $3$-form would be the replacement of $A$. Note that in this story, $A$ plays a somewhat different role.



    Think of the $3$-form as a singular cochain on $M$, so integration is pairing the cochain with the fundamental class of the manifold $M$ (assume it's closed and oriented). Since a field on our manifold is still a principal $G$-bundle, determined by a map $f_P:Mto BG$, we can associate to each bundle a $3$-dimensional cohomology class if we fix a choice of $alphain mathrmH^3(BG;mathbfC^times)$; then, the $3$-form "$q(A)$" associated to $P$ is $f_P^ast(alpha)in mathrmH^3(M;mathbfC^times)$. (Really, one should fix a $3$-cocycle in $Z^3(BG;mathbfC^times)$.) The action associated to $P$ is then $langle [M], f_P^ast(alpha)rangle$, and to obtain the quantum theory, one can now integrate over the space of all $G$-bundles (with the same measure as the untwisted case). Note that $A$ by itself doesn't appear in this story; only the analogue of the associated $3$-form does.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      5












      $begingroup$

      In quantum Chern-Simons theory with gauge group $G$ (compact Lie), a field on a 3-manifold $M$ is a principal $G$-bundle with a connection $A$. The partition function/path integral associated to $M$ is supposed to be the integral over the (generally infinite-dimensional) space ("stack") $mathcalF$ of all principal $G$-bundles $P$ over $M$ equipped with a choice of connection $A$ (modulo gauge equivalence) of $exp(iS(A))$, where $S$ is the classical Chern-Simons action.



      Perhaps it is easier for pedagogical purposes to explore the simpler case of Chern-Simons theory when $G$ is finite; this is Dijkgraaf-Witten theory. In this case, one can make the notion of an integral over $mathcalF$ perfectly rigorous. If $G$ is finite, then each bundle has a unique connection, so $mathcalF$ is precisely $[M, BG]$, where $BG$ is the classifying space of $G$. The Lie algebra of $G$ is also trivial, so the action vanishes, and we're left with integrating (summing) $1$ over the space $[M,BG]$ with respect to some measure; the weight of a principal $G$-bundle $P$ in this case is $1/|mathrmAut(P)|$. In other words, the finite-group version of the Chern-Simons partition function is
      $$Z(M) = sum_Pin [M,BG] frac1mathrmAut(P).$$



      This is the literal analogue of Chern-Simons theory for a finite gauge group; however, a more interesting analogue is twisted Dijkgraaf-Witten theory, which might be what you were trying to get at. Recall that the action associated to the field $(P,A)$ over $M$ is $S(A) = int_M q(A)$; what matters is that the integrand $q(A)$ is a $3$-form. Since a Chern-Simons field on $M$ is a principal $G$-bundle with a choice of connection $A$, one might attempt to "canonically" associate to each principal $G$-bundle a $3$-form on $M$ in the finite group case; this $3$-form would be the replacement of $A$. Note that in this story, $A$ plays a somewhat different role.



      Think of the $3$-form as a singular cochain on $M$, so integration is pairing the cochain with the fundamental class of the manifold $M$ (assume it's closed and oriented). Since a field on our manifold is still a principal $G$-bundle, determined by a map $f_P:Mto BG$, we can associate to each bundle a $3$-dimensional cohomology class if we fix a choice of $alphain mathrmH^3(BG;mathbfC^times)$; then, the $3$-form "$q(A)$" associated to $P$ is $f_P^ast(alpha)in mathrmH^3(M;mathbfC^times)$. (Really, one should fix a $3$-cocycle in $Z^3(BG;mathbfC^times)$.) The action associated to $P$ is then $langle [M], f_P^ast(alpha)rangle$, and to obtain the quantum theory, one can now integrate over the space of all $G$-bundles (with the same measure as the untwisted case). Note that $A$ by itself doesn't appear in this story; only the analogue of the associated $3$-form does.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        5












        5








        5





        $begingroup$

        In quantum Chern-Simons theory with gauge group $G$ (compact Lie), a field on a 3-manifold $M$ is a principal $G$-bundle with a connection $A$. The partition function/path integral associated to $M$ is supposed to be the integral over the (generally infinite-dimensional) space ("stack") $mathcalF$ of all principal $G$-bundles $P$ over $M$ equipped with a choice of connection $A$ (modulo gauge equivalence) of $exp(iS(A))$, where $S$ is the classical Chern-Simons action.



        Perhaps it is easier for pedagogical purposes to explore the simpler case of Chern-Simons theory when $G$ is finite; this is Dijkgraaf-Witten theory. In this case, one can make the notion of an integral over $mathcalF$ perfectly rigorous. If $G$ is finite, then each bundle has a unique connection, so $mathcalF$ is precisely $[M, BG]$, where $BG$ is the classifying space of $G$. The Lie algebra of $G$ is also trivial, so the action vanishes, and we're left with integrating (summing) $1$ over the space $[M,BG]$ with respect to some measure; the weight of a principal $G$-bundle $P$ in this case is $1/|mathrmAut(P)|$. In other words, the finite-group version of the Chern-Simons partition function is
        $$Z(M) = sum_Pin [M,BG] frac1mathrmAut(P).$$



        This is the literal analogue of Chern-Simons theory for a finite gauge group; however, a more interesting analogue is twisted Dijkgraaf-Witten theory, which might be what you were trying to get at. Recall that the action associated to the field $(P,A)$ over $M$ is $S(A) = int_M q(A)$; what matters is that the integrand $q(A)$ is a $3$-form. Since a Chern-Simons field on $M$ is a principal $G$-bundle with a choice of connection $A$, one might attempt to "canonically" associate to each principal $G$-bundle a $3$-form on $M$ in the finite group case; this $3$-form would be the replacement of $A$. Note that in this story, $A$ plays a somewhat different role.



        Think of the $3$-form as a singular cochain on $M$, so integration is pairing the cochain with the fundamental class of the manifold $M$ (assume it's closed and oriented). Since a field on our manifold is still a principal $G$-bundle, determined by a map $f_P:Mto BG$, we can associate to each bundle a $3$-dimensional cohomology class if we fix a choice of $alphain mathrmH^3(BG;mathbfC^times)$; then, the $3$-form "$q(A)$" associated to $P$ is $f_P^ast(alpha)in mathrmH^3(M;mathbfC^times)$. (Really, one should fix a $3$-cocycle in $Z^3(BG;mathbfC^times)$.) The action associated to $P$ is then $langle [M], f_P^ast(alpha)rangle$, and to obtain the quantum theory, one can now integrate over the space of all $G$-bundles (with the same measure as the untwisted case). Note that $A$ by itself doesn't appear in this story; only the analogue of the associated $3$-form does.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        In quantum Chern-Simons theory with gauge group $G$ (compact Lie), a field on a 3-manifold $M$ is a principal $G$-bundle with a connection $A$. The partition function/path integral associated to $M$ is supposed to be the integral over the (generally infinite-dimensional) space ("stack") $mathcalF$ of all principal $G$-bundles $P$ over $M$ equipped with a choice of connection $A$ (modulo gauge equivalence) of $exp(iS(A))$, where $S$ is the classical Chern-Simons action.



        Perhaps it is easier for pedagogical purposes to explore the simpler case of Chern-Simons theory when $G$ is finite; this is Dijkgraaf-Witten theory. In this case, one can make the notion of an integral over $mathcalF$ perfectly rigorous. If $G$ is finite, then each bundle has a unique connection, so $mathcalF$ is precisely $[M, BG]$, where $BG$ is the classifying space of $G$. The Lie algebra of $G$ is also trivial, so the action vanishes, and we're left with integrating (summing) $1$ over the space $[M,BG]$ with respect to some measure; the weight of a principal $G$-bundle $P$ in this case is $1/|mathrmAut(P)|$. In other words, the finite-group version of the Chern-Simons partition function is
        $$Z(M) = sum_Pin [M,BG] frac1mathrmAut(P).$$



        This is the literal analogue of Chern-Simons theory for a finite gauge group; however, a more interesting analogue is twisted Dijkgraaf-Witten theory, which might be what you were trying to get at. Recall that the action associated to the field $(P,A)$ over $M$ is $S(A) = int_M q(A)$; what matters is that the integrand $q(A)$ is a $3$-form. Since a Chern-Simons field on $M$ is a principal $G$-bundle with a choice of connection $A$, one might attempt to "canonically" associate to each principal $G$-bundle a $3$-form on $M$ in the finite group case; this $3$-form would be the replacement of $A$. Note that in this story, $A$ plays a somewhat different role.



        Think of the $3$-form as a singular cochain on $M$, so integration is pairing the cochain with the fundamental class of the manifold $M$ (assume it's closed and oriented). Since a field on our manifold is still a principal $G$-bundle, determined by a map $f_P:Mto BG$, we can associate to each bundle a $3$-dimensional cohomology class if we fix a choice of $alphain mathrmH^3(BG;mathbfC^times)$; then, the $3$-form "$q(A)$" associated to $P$ is $f_P^ast(alpha)in mathrmH^3(M;mathbfC^times)$. (Really, one should fix a $3$-cocycle in $Z^3(BG;mathbfC^times)$.) The action associated to $P$ is then $langle [M], f_P^ast(alpha)rangle$, and to obtain the quantum theory, one can now integrate over the space of all $G$-bundles (with the same measure as the untwisted case). Note that $A$ by itself doesn't appear in this story; only the analogue of the associated $3$-form does.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 7 hours ago









        skdskd

        2,4181 gold badge10 silver badges28 bronze badges




        2,4181 gold badge10 silver badges28 bronze badges



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f334510%2fimportance-of-the-principal-bundle-in-chern-simons-theory%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            François Viète Contents Biography Work and thought Bibliography See also Notes Further reading External links Navigation menup. 21Google Bookspp. 75–77Google BooksDe thou (from University of Saint Andrews)ArchivedGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle booksGoogle Bookscc-parthenay.frL'histoire universelle (fr)Universal History (en)ArchivedAdsabs.harvard.eduPagesperso-orange.frArchive.orgChikara Sasaki. Descartes' mathematical thought p.259Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle Bookspp. 152 and onwardGoogle BooksGoogle BooksScribd.comGoogle Books1257-7979Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGallica.bnf.frGoogle BooksGoogle Books"François Viète"Francois Viète: Father of Modern Algebraic NotationThe Lawyer and the GamblerAbout TarporleySite de Jean-Paul GuichardL'algèbre nouvelle"About the Harmonicon"cb120511976(data)1188044800000 0001 0913 5903n82164680ola2013766880073431702w6vt1sb70287374827140948071409480