Is there any evidence that the small canisters (10 liters) of 95% oxygen actually help with altitude sickness?Acclimitization: Would 20 min at an “oxygen bar” deliver more than an ephermal boost to a healthy person?Can you pre-identify the risk of severe Altitude sickness?Is there evidence to support or refute the hypothesis that frequent trips to high altitude aid acclimatization?

Isn't this a trivial corollary?

Hot coffee brewing solutions for deep woods camping

What kind of wire should I use to pigtail an outlet?

Inverse-quotes-quine

Would a two-seat light aircaft with a landing speed of 20 knots and a top speed of 180 knots be technically possible?

Why is Madam Hooch not a professor?

Was there ever a name for the weapons of the Others?

Animation advice please

As a DM, how do you control a dysfunctional group wanting different things out of a game?

How to reply to small talk/random facts in a non-offensive way?

What are the benefits of using the X Card safety tool in comparison to plain communication?

How well known and how commonly used was Huffman coding in 1979?

How to split an equation over two lines?

Why is the voltage measurement of this circuit different when the switch is on?

Is this one of the engines from the 9/11 aircraft?

Cascading Repair Costs following Blown Head Gasket on a 2004 Subaru Outback

Analog is Obtuse!

Do equal angles necessarily mean a polygon is regular?

Did Karl Marx ever use any example that involved cotton and dollars to illustrate the way capital and surplus value were generated?

ては's role in this 「追いかけては来ないでしょう」

What happens when I sacrifice a creature when my Teysa Karlov is on the battlefield?

Employer wants to use my work email account after I quit, is this legal under German law? Is this a GDPR waiver?

Sho, greek letter

Catching generic Exception in a toString implementation - bad practice?



Is there any evidence that the small canisters (10 liters) of 95% oxygen actually help with altitude sickness?


Acclimitization: Would 20 min at an “oxygen bar” deliver more than an ephermal boost to a healthy person?Can you pre-identify the risk of severe Altitude sickness?Is there evidence to support or refute the hypothesis that frequent trips to high altitude aid acclimatization?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3















In Colorado outdoor stores its not uncommon to see these small canisters of 95% percent oxygen that's sold to help people cope with high altitude.



Is there any evidence that these actually help with altitude sickness? I mean plenty of places still sell the Sawyer Venom extractor kits and there is no evidence those work.










share|improve this question
























  • You can find evidence if you look at the various treatment methods used by medical professionals. Virtually all of them include either directly (e.g. application of supplemental O2 or drugs that increase breathing rate) or indirectly (remove patient to lower altitude) increasing the oxygen saturation of the patient's' body. The cerebral and pulmonary edema common with altitude sickness is caused by lower oxygen levels than what the patient has been acclimated to...

    – Jimmy Fix-it
    6 hours ago











  • @JimmyFix-it Human lungs are about 6 liters and each breath is around 0.5 liters. The cans hold 10 liters.

    – Charlie Brumbaugh
    6 hours ago











  • So knowing that O2 will help, the question is related to the minimal amount (~20 breaths) of therapy available in these small OTC canisters... got it.

    – Jimmy Fix-it
    6 hours ago











  • @Charlie Brumbaugh - For what is worth, recently in a medical setting I learned a bit about supplemental oxygen, not sure how that translates to altitude related uses, but; for most people on O2 a typical amount would be 2-4 liters / hour. In more extreme medically monitored cases, use could be up to 10-14 liters / hour.

    – renesis
    5 hours ago






  • 1





    @renesis; no, emergency responders (EMTs) in the US typically administer O2 via mask at 15 liters per minute. A severe case of altitude sickness (resulting in altered consciousness or other tangible life-threatening symptoms) would be treated that way.

    – Jimmy Fix-it
    2 hours ago

















3















In Colorado outdoor stores its not uncommon to see these small canisters of 95% percent oxygen that's sold to help people cope with high altitude.



Is there any evidence that these actually help with altitude sickness? I mean plenty of places still sell the Sawyer Venom extractor kits and there is no evidence those work.










share|improve this question
























  • You can find evidence if you look at the various treatment methods used by medical professionals. Virtually all of them include either directly (e.g. application of supplemental O2 or drugs that increase breathing rate) or indirectly (remove patient to lower altitude) increasing the oxygen saturation of the patient's' body. The cerebral and pulmonary edema common with altitude sickness is caused by lower oxygen levels than what the patient has been acclimated to...

    – Jimmy Fix-it
    6 hours ago











  • @JimmyFix-it Human lungs are about 6 liters and each breath is around 0.5 liters. The cans hold 10 liters.

    – Charlie Brumbaugh
    6 hours ago











  • So knowing that O2 will help, the question is related to the minimal amount (~20 breaths) of therapy available in these small OTC canisters... got it.

    – Jimmy Fix-it
    6 hours ago











  • @Charlie Brumbaugh - For what is worth, recently in a medical setting I learned a bit about supplemental oxygen, not sure how that translates to altitude related uses, but; for most people on O2 a typical amount would be 2-4 liters / hour. In more extreme medically monitored cases, use could be up to 10-14 liters / hour.

    – renesis
    5 hours ago






  • 1





    @renesis; no, emergency responders (EMTs) in the US typically administer O2 via mask at 15 liters per minute. A severe case of altitude sickness (resulting in altered consciousness or other tangible life-threatening symptoms) would be treated that way.

    – Jimmy Fix-it
    2 hours ago













3












3








3








In Colorado outdoor stores its not uncommon to see these small canisters of 95% percent oxygen that's sold to help people cope with high altitude.



Is there any evidence that these actually help with altitude sickness? I mean plenty of places still sell the Sawyer Venom extractor kits and there is no evidence those work.










share|improve this question
















In Colorado outdoor stores its not uncommon to see these small canisters of 95% percent oxygen that's sold to help people cope with high altitude.



Is there any evidence that these actually help with altitude sickness? I mean plenty of places still sell the Sawyer Venom extractor kits and there is no evidence those work.







high-altitude






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 7 hours ago







Charlie Brumbaugh

















asked 8 hours ago









Charlie BrumbaughCharlie Brumbaugh

52.9k17 gold badges149 silver badges309 bronze badges




52.9k17 gold badges149 silver badges309 bronze badges












  • You can find evidence if you look at the various treatment methods used by medical professionals. Virtually all of them include either directly (e.g. application of supplemental O2 or drugs that increase breathing rate) or indirectly (remove patient to lower altitude) increasing the oxygen saturation of the patient's' body. The cerebral and pulmonary edema common with altitude sickness is caused by lower oxygen levels than what the patient has been acclimated to...

    – Jimmy Fix-it
    6 hours ago











  • @JimmyFix-it Human lungs are about 6 liters and each breath is around 0.5 liters. The cans hold 10 liters.

    – Charlie Brumbaugh
    6 hours ago











  • So knowing that O2 will help, the question is related to the minimal amount (~20 breaths) of therapy available in these small OTC canisters... got it.

    – Jimmy Fix-it
    6 hours ago











  • @Charlie Brumbaugh - For what is worth, recently in a medical setting I learned a bit about supplemental oxygen, not sure how that translates to altitude related uses, but; for most people on O2 a typical amount would be 2-4 liters / hour. In more extreme medically monitored cases, use could be up to 10-14 liters / hour.

    – renesis
    5 hours ago






  • 1





    @renesis; no, emergency responders (EMTs) in the US typically administer O2 via mask at 15 liters per minute. A severe case of altitude sickness (resulting in altered consciousness or other tangible life-threatening symptoms) would be treated that way.

    – Jimmy Fix-it
    2 hours ago

















  • You can find evidence if you look at the various treatment methods used by medical professionals. Virtually all of them include either directly (e.g. application of supplemental O2 or drugs that increase breathing rate) or indirectly (remove patient to lower altitude) increasing the oxygen saturation of the patient's' body. The cerebral and pulmonary edema common with altitude sickness is caused by lower oxygen levels than what the patient has been acclimated to...

    – Jimmy Fix-it
    6 hours ago











  • @JimmyFix-it Human lungs are about 6 liters and each breath is around 0.5 liters. The cans hold 10 liters.

    – Charlie Brumbaugh
    6 hours ago











  • So knowing that O2 will help, the question is related to the minimal amount (~20 breaths) of therapy available in these small OTC canisters... got it.

    – Jimmy Fix-it
    6 hours ago











  • @Charlie Brumbaugh - For what is worth, recently in a medical setting I learned a bit about supplemental oxygen, not sure how that translates to altitude related uses, but; for most people on O2 a typical amount would be 2-4 liters / hour. In more extreme medically monitored cases, use could be up to 10-14 liters / hour.

    – renesis
    5 hours ago






  • 1





    @renesis; no, emergency responders (EMTs) in the US typically administer O2 via mask at 15 liters per minute. A severe case of altitude sickness (resulting in altered consciousness or other tangible life-threatening symptoms) would be treated that way.

    – Jimmy Fix-it
    2 hours ago
















You can find evidence if you look at the various treatment methods used by medical professionals. Virtually all of them include either directly (e.g. application of supplemental O2 or drugs that increase breathing rate) or indirectly (remove patient to lower altitude) increasing the oxygen saturation of the patient's' body. The cerebral and pulmonary edema common with altitude sickness is caused by lower oxygen levels than what the patient has been acclimated to...

– Jimmy Fix-it
6 hours ago





You can find evidence if you look at the various treatment methods used by medical professionals. Virtually all of them include either directly (e.g. application of supplemental O2 or drugs that increase breathing rate) or indirectly (remove patient to lower altitude) increasing the oxygen saturation of the patient's' body. The cerebral and pulmonary edema common with altitude sickness is caused by lower oxygen levels than what the patient has been acclimated to...

– Jimmy Fix-it
6 hours ago













@JimmyFix-it Human lungs are about 6 liters and each breath is around 0.5 liters. The cans hold 10 liters.

– Charlie Brumbaugh
6 hours ago





@JimmyFix-it Human lungs are about 6 liters and each breath is around 0.5 liters. The cans hold 10 liters.

– Charlie Brumbaugh
6 hours ago













So knowing that O2 will help, the question is related to the minimal amount (~20 breaths) of therapy available in these small OTC canisters... got it.

– Jimmy Fix-it
6 hours ago





So knowing that O2 will help, the question is related to the minimal amount (~20 breaths) of therapy available in these small OTC canisters... got it.

– Jimmy Fix-it
6 hours ago













@Charlie Brumbaugh - For what is worth, recently in a medical setting I learned a bit about supplemental oxygen, not sure how that translates to altitude related uses, but; for most people on O2 a typical amount would be 2-4 liters / hour. In more extreme medically monitored cases, use could be up to 10-14 liters / hour.

– renesis
5 hours ago





@Charlie Brumbaugh - For what is worth, recently in a medical setting I learned a bit about supplemental oxygen, not sure how that translates to altitude related uses, but; for most people on O2 a typical amount would be 2-4 liters / hour. In more extreme medically monitored cases, use could be up to 10-14 liters / hour.

– renesis
5 hours ago




1




1





@renesis; no, emergency responders (EMTs) in the US typically administer O2 via mask at 15 liters per minute. A severe case of altitude sickness (resulting in altered consciousness or other tangible life-threatening symptoms) would be treated that way.

– Jimmy Fix-it
2 hours ago





@renesis; no, emergency responders (EMTs) in the US typically administer O2 via mask at 15 liters per minute. A severe case of altitude sickness (resulting in altered consciousness or other tangible life-threatening symptoms) would be treated that way.

– Jimmy Fix-it
2 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















2














There is some evidence that increasing the concentration oxygen in the air breathed can help with mild symptoms of altitude sickness.



Source here looks at long-term increases in oxygen concentration at high elevation and finds benefits--whether or not the same happens with short bursts from a canister is unclear. I have heard circumstantial evidence from friends in the skiing world that a hit from the oxygen canister works pretty well for mild exhaustion after a hike at 13,000 ft or so.



Since one of the main causes of altitude sickness is the reduced partial pressure of oxygen at elevation, increasing the ratio of oxygen to other gases in the air should help a bit, to an extent. Of course, when the pressure is really low, no matter how high the concentration or O2, the partial pressure will never be enough.



I'd also add that the source in Gabriel's answer is about hyperoxia at sea level, not how to mitigate hypoxyia at elevation. Then again, Gabriel is probably right that stores carry them because they sell, not because they necessarily work.



Edit re: how many breaths is the canister "useful" for: At sea level where atmospheric pressure is 760mmHg and O2 concentration is 21% the partial pressure is about 160mmHg. By 10,000 feet, that drops to about 110mmHg. To maintain sea-level partial pressure of O2, you'd need to be breathing about 30% O2 instead of 20%, which means 1.5 times as much.



So for each 0.5L breath of 21% oxygen air at 10,000ft, you'd need to inhale an additional 0.052L of 95% oxygen to get the same inhaled partial pressures as sea level. The 10L can would give you 192 hits of this volume. This fits nearly with the 200 breaths advertised!



Obviously, at higher elevations, you'd need more oxygen, but since these are mostly sold at ski resorts where 9,000-12,000ft is the norm, the 200 advertised servings per container seems reasonable.






share|improve this answer










New contributor



John Hughes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


























    2














    In this study from 2014 in the Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, the conclusion seems to be that it's no better than placebo:



    Introduction (excerpt)




    Oxygen supplementation has often been used as an aid for athletic individuals who ascend to high altitudes before acclimatization or experience symptoms of altitude sickness. The effectiveness of oxygen supplementation in augmenting arterial blood oxygen levels [...] could have contributed to hyperoxia supplements, gaining popularity in the ergogenic aid market. [...] However, the efficacy of such products is in need of evaluation. There is increasing need for additional research to determine the efficacy of such products due to the fact that hyperoxic supplements are being made available to the general public, with promises of enhancing exercise performance and recovery.




    Conclusion (excerpt)




    As was previously stated, hyperoxia supplements are gaining popularity in the ergogenic aid market with a number of manufacturers supporting the use of personal oxygen cylinders to augment sports performance, and the aim of this study was to explore the efficacy of such products. The present investigation does not support the use of personal OSs for exercise performance, exercise recovery, or postexercise cognitive performance. It is important that strength and conditioning professionals are armed with accurate and relevant data when making decisions regarding the use of supplements. Given the results of this study, personal hyperoxic products do not seem to provide the desired results that would be expected from an effective ergogenic aid. Athletes, coaches, trainers, and recreational exercisers are encouraged to consider the results of this study when considering the use of similar supplements.




    I am a big skeptic of this kind of "supplement". It seems like a good way to upsell cans full of worthless product, similar to homeopathic pills.



    Usually, the reason stores carry these even if there's no proven health benefit is because there is demand, and they are harmless in themselves.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 1





      IANAMD but, the question is not about using supplemental oxygen to induce Hyperoxia to boost performance or in post workout conditions at normal atmospheric oxygen concentrations (normal altitudes). The question is about treating Hypoxia / altitude sickness at high altitudes. The excerpt you provided is addressing a COMPLETELY different use for supplemental oxygen.

      – renesis
      5 hours ago











    • @renesis If you take the time to read the article and check the articles it references (many do show that supplemental oxygen does help treat hypoxic symptoms), it's never in the context of low-pressure personal canisters, but as medical treatments with significant equipment. This study focuses on the exact product showcased in the question.

      – Gabriel C.
      4 hours ago






    • 1





      Look I'm not going to argue with you, I have read the article, I do not have time to read the references. If you are saying the references indicate low pressure personal oxygen canisters are not useful for treating altitude sickness then that should be your answer. Everything else you've written is debunking their use for performance. Altitude sickness is not a lack of performance. Ergogenic = enhancing physical performance. I'm not defending their use, but this study does not evaluate them for the use in question. IE: "Is there any evidence that these actually help with altitude sickness?"

      – renesis
      3 hours ago






    • 1





      @renesis Thanks for distinguishing between altitude sickness and reduction in energy and performance. I have never experienced altitude sickness (e.g., nausea, trouble sleeping, headache, loss of appetite) but always experience a reduction in energy for at least several days. I don't know if sniffing O2 would have helped (See this Q. I wish more people here would not automatically assume that feeling non-energetic means one is sick.

      – ab2
      10 mins ago


















    0














    While not sure about the medical backing, from personal experience I once had HAPE and my oxygen reached 62% SpO2 by the time I was at the ER. I had one of those style canisters and I think it definitely helped during the 45 min between buying it and getting to the ER. I was using it fairly constantly during that time period though not just a single air shot as you see advertised. While I can't say conclusively what my SpO2 level would have been, it possibly would have been lower than 62%.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor



    noah is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "395"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2foutdoors.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f22441%2fis-there-any-evidence-that-the-small-canisters-10-liters-of-95-oxygen-actuall%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2














      There is some evidence that increasing the concentration oxygen in the air breathed can help with mild symptoms of altitude sickness.



      Source here looks at long-term increases in oxygen concentration at high elevation and finds benefits--whether or not the same happens with short bursts from a canister is unclear. I have heard circumstantial evidence from friends in the skiing world that a hit from the oxygen canister works pretty well for mild exhaustion after a hike at 13,000 ft or so.



      Since one of the main causes of altitude sickness is the reduced partial pressure of oxygen at elevation, increasing the ratio of oxygen to other gases in the air should help a bit, to an extent. Of course, when the pressure is really low, no matter how high the concentration or O2, the partial pressure will never be enough.



      I'd also add that the source in Gabriel's answer is about hyperoxia at sea level, not how to mitigate hypoxyia at elevation. Then again, Gabriel is probably right that stores carry them because they sell, not because they necessarily work.



      Edit re: how many breaths is the canister "useful" for: At sea level where atmospheric pressure is 760mmHg and O2 concentration is 21% the partial pressure is about 160mmHg. By 10,000 feet, that drops to about 110mmHg. To maintain sea-level partial pressure of O2, you'd need to be breathing about 30% O2 instead of 20%, which means 1.5 times as much.



      So for each 0.5L breath of 21% oxygen air at 10,000ft, you'd need to inhale an additional 0.052L of 95% oxygen to get the same inhaled partial pressures as sea level. The 10L can would give you 192 hits of this volume. This fits nearly with the 200 breaths advertised!



      Obviously, at higher elevations, you'd need more oxygen, but since these are mostly sold at ski resorts where 9,000-12,000ft is the norm, the 200 advertised servings per container seems reasonable.






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor



      John Hughes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.























        2














        There is some evidence that increasing the concentration oxygen in the air breathed can help with mild symptoms of altitude sickness.



        Source here looks at long-term increases in oxygen concentration at high elevation and finds benefits--whether or not the same happens with short bursts from a canister is unclear. I have heard circumstantial evidence from friends in the skiing world that a hit from the oxygen canister works pretty well for mild exhaustion after a hike at 13,000 ft or so.



        Since one of the main causes of altitude sickness is the reduced partial pressure of oxygen at elevation, increasing the ratio of oxygen to other gases in the air should help a bit, to an extent. Of course, when the pressure is really low, no matter how high the concentration or O2, the partial pressure will never be enough.



        I'd also add that the source in Gabriel's answer is about hyperoxia at sea level, not how to mitigate hypoxyia at elevation. Then again, Gabriel is probably right that stores carry them because they sell, not because they necessarily work.



        Edit re: how many breaths is the canister "useful" for: At sea level where atmospheric pressure is 760mmHg and O2 concentration is 21% the partial pressure is about 160mmHg. By 10,000 feet, that drops to about 110mmHg. To maintain sea-level partial pressure of O2, you'd need to be breathing about 30% O2 instead of 20%, which means 1.5 times as much.



        So for each 0.5L breath of 21% oxygen air at 10,000ft, you'd need to inhale an additional 0.052L of 95% oxygen to get the same inhaled partial pressures as sea level. The 10L can would give you 192 hits of this volume. This fits nearly with the 200 breaths advertised!



        Obviously, at higher elevations, you'd need more oxygen, but since these are mostly sold at ski resorts where 9,000-12,000ft is the norm, the 200 advertised servings per container seems reasonable.






        share|improve this answer










        New contributor



        John Hughes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





















          2












          2








          2







          There is some evidence that increasing the concentration oxygen in the air breathed can help with mild symptoms of altitude sickness.



          Source here looks at long-term increases in oxygen concentration at high elevation and finds benefits--whether or not the same happens with short bursts from a canister is unclear. I have heard circumstantial evidence from friends in the skiing world that a hit from the oxygen canister works pretty well for mild exhaustion after a hike at 13,000 ft or so.



          Since one of the main causes of altitude sickness is the reduced partial pressure of oxygen at elevation, increasing the ratio of oxygen to other gases in the air should help a bit, to an extent. Of course, when the pressure is really low, no matter how high the concentration or O2, the partial pressure will never be enough.



          I'd also add that the source in Gabriel's answer is about hyperoxia at sea level, not how to mitigate hypoxyia at elevation. Then again, Gabriel is probably right that stores carry them because they sell, not because they necessarily work.



          Edit re: how many breaths is the canister "useful" for: At sea level where atmospheric pressure is 760mmHg and O2 concentration is 21% the partial pressure is about 160mmHg. By 10,000 feet, that drops to about 110mmHg. To maintain sea-level partial pressure of O2, you'd need to be breathing about 30% O2 instead of 20%, which means 1.5 times as much.



          So for each 0.5L breath of 21% oxygen air at 10,000ft, you'd need to inhale an additional 0.052L of 95% oxygen to get the same inhaled partial pressures as sea level. The 10L can would give you 192 hits of this volume. This fits nearly with the 200 breaths advertised!



          Obviously, at higher elevations, you'd need more oxygen, but since these are mostly sold at ski resorts where 9,000-12,000ft is the norm, the 200 advertised servings per container seems reasonable.






          share|improve this answer










          New contributor



          John Hughes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          There is some evidence that increasing the concentration oxygen in the air breathed can help with mild symptoms of altitude sickness.



          Source here looks at long-term increases in oxygen concentration at high elevation and finds benefits--whether or not the same happens with short bursts from a canister is unclear. I have heard circumstantial evidence from friends in the skiing world that a hit from the oxygen canister works pretty well for mild exhaustion after a hike at 13,000 ft or so.



          Since one of the main causes of altitude sickness is the reduced partial pressure of oxygen at elevation, increasing the ratio of oxygen to other gases in the air should help a bit, to an extent. Of course, when the pressure is really low, no matter how high the concentration or O2, the partial pressure will never be enough.



          I'd also add that the source in Gabriel's answer is about hyperoxia at sea level, not how to mitigate hypoxyia at elevation. Then again, Gabriel is probably right that stores carry them because they sell, not because they necessarily work.



          Edit re: how many breaths is the canister "useful" for: At sea level where atmospheric pressure is 760mmHg and O2 concentration is 21% the partial pressure is about 160mmHg. By 10,000 feet, that drops to about 110mmHg. To maintain sea-level partial pressure of O2, you'd need to be breathing about 30% O2 instead of 20%, which means 1.5 times as much.



          So for each 0.5L breath of 21% oxygen air at 10,000ft, you'd need to inhale an additional 0.052L of 95% oxygen to get the same inhaled partial pressures as sea level. The 10L can would give you 192 hits of this volume. This fits nearly with the 200 breaths advertised!



          Obviously, at higher elevations, you'd need more oxygen, but since these are mostly sold at ski resorts where 9,000-12,000ft is the norm, the 200 advertised servings per container seems reasonable.







          share|improve this answer










          New contributor



          John Hughes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.








          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 5 hours ago





















          New contributor



          John Hughes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.








          answered 6 hours ago









          John HughesJohn Hughes

          293 bronze badges




          293 bronze badges




          New contributor



          John Hughes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.




          New contributor




          John Hughes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.

























              2














              In this study from 2014 in the Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, the conclusion seems to be that it's no better than placebo:



              Introduction (excerpt)




              Oxygen supplementation has often been used as an aid for athletic individuals who ascend to high altitudes before acclimatization or experience symptoms of altitude sickness. The effectiveness of oxygen supplementation in augmenting arterial blood oxygen levels [...] could have contributed to hyperoxia supplements, gaining popularity in the ergogenic aid market. [...] However, the efficacy of such products is in need of evaluation. There is increasing need for additional research to determine the efficacy of such products due to the fact that hyperoxic supplements are being made available to the general public, with promises of enhancing exercise performance and recovery.




              Conclusion (excerpt)




              As was previously stated, hyperoxia supplements are gaining popularity in the ergogenic aid market with a number of manufacturers supporting the use of personal oxygen cylinders to augment sports performance, and the aim of this study was to explore the efficacy of such products. The present investigation does not support the use of personal OSs for exercise performance, exercise recovery, or postexercise cognitive performance. It is important that strength and conditioning professionals are armed with accurate and relevant data when making decisions regarding the use of supplements. Given the results of this study, personal hyperoxic products do not seem to provide the desired results that would be expected from an effective ergogenic aid. Athletes, coaches, trainers, and recreational exercisers are encouraged to consider the results of this study when considering the use of similar supplements.




              I am a big skeptic of this kind of "supplement". It seems like a good way to upsell cans full of worthless product, similar to homeopathic pills.



              Usually, the reason stores carry these even if there's no proven health benefit is because there is demand, and they are harmless in themselves.






              share|improve this answer




















              • 1





                IANAMD but, the question is not about using supplemental oxygen to induce Hyperoxia to boost performance or in post workout conditions at normal atmospheric oxygen concentrations (normal altitudes). The question is about treating Hypoxia / altitude sickness at high altitudes. The excerpt you provided is addressing a COMPLETELY different use for supplemental oxygen.

                – renesis
                5 hours ago











              • @renesis If you take the time to read the article and check the articles it references (many do show that supplemental oxygen does help treat hypoxic symptoms), it's never in the context of low-pressure personal canisters, but as medical treatments with significant equipment. This study focuses on the exact product showcased in the question.

                – Gabriel C.
                4 hours ago






              • 1





                Look I'm not going to argue with you, I have read the article, I do not have time to read the references. If you are saying the references indicate low pressure personal oxygen canisters are not useful for treating altitude sickness then that should be your answer. Everything else you've written is debunking their use for performance. Altitude sickness is not a lack of performance. Ergogenic = enhancing physical performance. I'm not defending their use, but this study does not evaluate them for the use in question. IE: "Is there any evidence that these actually help with altitude sickness?"

                – renesis
                3 hours ago






              • 1





                @renesis Thanks for distinguishing between altitude sickness and reduction in energy and performance. I have never experienced altitude sickness (e.g., nausea, trouble sleeping, headache, loss of appetite) but always experience a reduction in energy for at least several days. I don't know if sniffing O2 would have helped (See this Q. I wish more people here would not automatically assume that feeling non-energetic means one is sick.

                – ab2
                10 mins ago















              2














              In this study from 2014 in the Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, the conclusion seems to be that it's no better than placebo:



              Introduction (excerpt)




              Oxygen supplementation has often been used as an aid for athletic individuals who ascend to high altitudes before acclimatization or experience symptoms of altitude sickness. The effectiveness of oxygen supplementation in augmenting arterial blood oxygen levels [...] could have contributed to hyperoxia supplements, gaining popularity in the ergogenic aid market. [...] However, the efficacy of such products is in need of evaluation. There is increasing need for additional research to determine the efficacy of such products due to the fact that hyperoxic supplements are being made available to the general public, with promises of enhancing exercise performance and recovery.




              Conclusion (excerpt)




              As was previously stated, hyperoxia supplements are gaining popularity in the ergogenic aid market with a number of manufacturers supporting the use of personal oxygen cylinders to augment sports performance, and the aim of this study was to explore the efficacy of such products. The present investigation does not support the use of personal OSs for exercise performance, exercise recovery, or postexercise cognitive performance. It is important that strength and conditioning professionals are armed with accurate and relevant data when making decisions regarding the use of supplements. Given the results of this study, personal hyperoxic products do not seem to provide the desired results that would be expected from an effective ergogenic aid. Athletes, coaches, trainers, and recreational exercisers are encouraged to consider the results of this study when considering the use of similar supplements.




              I am a big skeptic of this kind of "supplement". It seems like a good way to upsell cans full of worthless product, similar to homeopathic pills.



              Usually, the reason stores carry these even if there's no proven health benefit is because there is demand, and they are harmless in themselves.






              share|improve this answer




















              • 1





                IANAMD but, the question is not about using supplemental oxygen to induce Hyperoxia to boost performance or in post workout conditions at normal atmospheric oxygen concentrations (normal altitudes). The question is about treating Hypoxia / altitude sickness at high altitudes. The excerpt you provided is addressing a COMPLETELY different use for supplemental oxygen.

                – renesis
                5 hours ago











              • @renesis If you take the time to read the article and check the articles it references (many do show that supplemental oxygen does help treat hypoxic symptoms), it's never in the context of low-pressure personal canisters, but as medical treatments with significant equipment. This study focuses on the exact product showcased in the question.

                – Gabriel C.
                4 hours ago






              • 1





                Look I'm not going to argue with you, I have read the article, I do not have time to read the references. If you are saying the references indicate low pressure personal oxygen canisters are not useful for treating altitude sickness then that should be your answer. Everything else you've written is debunking their use for performance. Altitude sickness is not a lack of performance. Ergogenic = enhancing physical performance. I'm not defending their use, but this study does not evaluate them for the use in question. IE: "Is there any evidence that these actually help with altitude sickness?"

                – renesis
                3 hours ago






              • 1





                @renesis Thanks for distinguishing between altitude sickness and reduction in energy and performance. I have never experienced altitude sickness (e.g., nausea, trouble sleeping, headache, loss of appetite) but always experience a reduction in energy for at least several days. I don't know if sniffing O2 would have helped (See this Q. I wish more people here would not automatically assume that feeling non-energetic means one is sick.

                – ab2
                10 mins ago













              2












              2








              2







              In this study from 2014 in the Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, the conclusion seems to be that it's no better than placebo:



              Introduction (excerpt)




              Oxygen supplementation has often been used as an aid for athletic individuals who ascend to high altitudes before acclimatization or experience symptoms of altitude sickness. The effectiveness of oxygen supplementation in augmenting arterial blood oxygen levels [...] could have contributed to hyperoxia supplements, gaining popularity in the ergogenic aid market. [...] However, the efficacy of such products is in need of evaluation. There is increasing need for additional research to determine the efficacy of such products due to the fact that hyperoxic supplements are being made available to the general public, with promises of enhancing exercise performance and recovery.




              Conclusion (excerpt)




              As was previously stated, hyperoxia supplements are gaining popularity in the ergogenic aid market with a number of manufacturers supporting the use of personal oxygen cylinders to augment sports performance, and the aim of this study was to explore the efficacy of such products. The present investigation does not support the use of personal OSs for exercise performance, exercise recovery, or postexercise cognitive performance. It is important that strength and conditioning professionals are armed with accurate and relevant data when making decisions regarding the use of supplements. Given the results of this study, personal hyperoxic products do not seem to provide the desired results that would be expected from an effective ergogenic aid. Athletes, coaches, trainers, and recreational exercisers are encouraged to consider the results of this study when considering the use of similar supplements.




              I am a big skeptic of this kind of "supplement". It seems like a good way to upsell cans full of worthless product, similar to homeopathic pills.



              Usually, the reason stores carry these even if there's no proven health benefit is because there is demand, and they are harmless in themselves.






              share|improve this answer















              In this study from 2014 in the Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, the conclusion seems to be that it's no better than placebo:



              Introduction (excerpt)




              Oxygen supplementation has often been used as an aid for athletic individuals who ascend to high altitudes before acclimatization or experience symptoms of altitude sickness. The effectiveness of oxygen supplementation in augmenting arterial blood oxygen levels [...] could have contributed to hyperoxia supplements, gaining popularity in the ergogenic aid market. [...] However, the efficacy of such products is in need of evaluation. There is increasing need for additional research to determine the efficacy of such products due to the fact that hyperoxic supplements are being made available to the general public, with promises of enhancing exercise performance and recovery.




              Conclusion (excerpt)




              As was previously stated, hyperoxia supplements are gaining popularity in the ergogenic aid market with a number of manufacturers supporting the use of personal oxygen cylinders to augment sports performance, and the aim of this study was to explore the efficacy of such products. The present investigation does not support the use of personal OSs for exercise performance, exercise recovery, or postexercise cognitive performance. It is important that strength and conditioning professionals are armed with accurate and relevant data when making decisions regarding the use of supplements. Given the results of this study, personal hyperoxic products do not seem to provide the desired results that would be expected from an effective ergogenic aid. Athletes, coaches, trainers, and recreational exercisers are encouraged to consider the results of this study when considering the use of similar supplements.




              I am a big skeptic of this kind of "supplement". It seems like a good way to upsell cans full of worthless product, similar to homeopathic pills.



              Usually, the reason stores carry these even if there's no proven health benefit is because there is demand, and they are harmless in themselves.







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited 4 hours ago

























              answered 7 hours ago









              Gabriel C.Gabriel C.

              2,9361 gold badge2 silver badges27 bronze badges




              2,9361 gold badge2 silver badges27 bronze badges







              • 1





                IANAMD but, the question is not about using supplemental oxygen to induce Hyperoxia to boost performance or in post workout conditions at normal atmospheric oxygen concentrations (normal altitudes). The question is about treating Hypoxia / altitude sickness at high altitudes. The excerpt you provided is addressing a COMPLETELY different use for supplemental oxygen.

                – renesis
                5 hours ago











              • @renesis If you take the time to read the article and check the articles it references (many do show that supplemental oxygen does help treat hypoxic symptoms), it's never in the context of low-pressure personal canisters, but as medical treatments with significant equipment. This study focuses on the exact product showcased in the question.

                – Gabriel C.
                4 hours ago






              • 1





                Look I'm not going to argue with you, I have read the article, I do not have time to read the references. If you are saying the references indicate low pressure personal oxygen canisters are not useful for treating altitude sickness then that should be your answer. Everything else you've written is debunking their use for performance. Altitude sickness is not a lack of performance. Ergogenic = enhancing physical performance. I'm not defending their use, but this study does not evaluate them for the use in question. IE: "Is there any evidence that these actually help with altitude sickness?"

                – renesis
                3 hours ago






              • 1





                @renesis Thanks for distinguishing between altitude sickness and reduction in energy and performance. I have never experienced altitude sickness (e.g., nausea, trouble sleeping, headache, loss of appetite) but always experience a reduction in energy for at least several days. I don't know if sniffing O2 would have helped (See this Q. I wish more people here would not automatically assume that feeling non-energetic means one is sick.

                – ab2
                10 mins ago












              • 1





                IANAMD but, the question is not about using supplemental oxygen to induce Hyperoxia to boost performance or in post workout conditions at normal atmospheric oxygen concentrations (normal altitudes). The question is about treating Hypoxia / altitude sickness at high altitudes. The excerpt you provided is addressing a COMPLETELY different use for supplemental oxygen.

                – renesis
                5 hours ago











              • @renesis If you take the time to read the article and check the articles it references (many do show that supplemental oxygen does help treat hypoxic symptoms), it's never in the context of low-pressure personal canisters, but as medical treatments with significant equipment. This study focuses on the exact product showcased in the question.

                – Gabriel C.
                4 hours ago






              • 1





                Look I'm not going to argue with you, I have read the article, I do not have time to read the references. If you are saying the references indicate low pressure personal oxygen canisters are not useful for treating altitude sickness then that should be your answer. Everything else you've written is debunking their use for performance. Altitude sickness is not a lack of performance. Ergogenic = enhancing physical performance. I'm not defending their use, but this study does not evaluate them for the use in question. IE: "Is there any evidence that these actually help with altitude sickness?"

                – renesis
                3 hours ago






              • 1





                @renesis Thanks for distinguishing between altitude sickness and reduction in energy and performance. I have never experienced altitude sickness (e.g., nausea, trouble sleeping, headache, loss of appetite) but always experience a reduction in energy for at least several days. I don't know if sniffing O2 would have helped (See this Q. I wish more people here would not automatically assume that feeling non-energetic means one is sick.

                – ab2
                10 mins ago







              1




              1





              IANAMD but, the question is not about using supplemental oxygen to induce Hyperoxia to boost performance or in post workout conditions at normal atmospheric oxygen concentrations (normal altitudes). The question is about treating Hypoxia / altitude sickness at high altitudes. The excerpt you provided is addressing a COMPLETELY different use for supplemental oxygen.

              – renesis
              5 hours ago





              IANAMD but, the question is not about using supplemental oxygen to induce Hyperoxia to boost performance or in post workout conditions at normal atmospheric oxygen concentrations (normal altitudes). The question is about treating Hypoxia / altitude sickness at high altitudes. The excerpt you provided is addressing a COMPLETELY different use for supplemental oxygen.

              – renesis
              5 hours ago













              @renesis If you take the time to read the article and check the articles it references (many do show that supplemental oxygen does help treat hypoxic symptoms), it's never in the context of low-pressure personal canisters, but as medical treatments with significant equipment. This study focuses on the exact product showcased in the question.

              – Gabriel C.
              4 hours ago





              @renesis If you take the time to read the article and check the articles it references (many do show that supplemental oxygen does help treat hypoxic symptoms), it's never in the context of low-pressure personal canisters, but as medical treatments with significant equipment. This study focuses on the exact product showcased in the question.

              – Gabriel C.
              4 hours ago




              1




              1





              Look I'm not going to argue with you, I have read the article, I do not have time to read the references. If you are saying the references indicate low pressure personal oxygen canisters are not useful for treating altitude sickness then that should be your answer. Everything else you've written is debunking their use for performance. Altitude sickness is not a lack of performance. Ergogenic = enhancing physical performance. I'm not defending their use, but this study does not evaluate them for the use in question. IE: "Is there any evidence that these actually help with altitude sickness?"

              – renesis
              3 hours ago





              Look I'm not going to argue with you, I have read the article, I do not have time to read the references. If you are saying the references indicate low pressure personal oxygen canisters are not useful for treating altitude sickness then that should be your answer. Everything else you've written is debunking their use for performance. Altitude sickness is not a lack of performance. Ergogenic = enhancing physical performance. I'm not defending their use, but this study does not evaluate them for the use in question. IE: "Is there any evidence that these actually help with altitude sickness?"

              – renesis
              3 hours ago




              1




              1





              @renesis Thanks for distinguishing between altitude sickness and reduction in energy and performance. I have never experienced altitude sickness (e.g., nausea, trouble sleeping, headache, loss of appetite) but always experience a reduction in energy for at least several days. I don't know if sniffing O2 would have helped (See this Q. I wish more people here would not automatically assume that feeling non-energetic means one is sick.

              – ab2
              10 mins ago





              @renesis Thanks for distinguishing between altitude sickness and reduction in energy and performance. I have never experienced altitude sickness (e.g., nausea, trouble sleeping, headache, loss of appetite) but always experience a reduction in energy for at least several days. I don't know if sniffing O2 would have helped (See this Q. I wish more people here would not automatically assume that feeling non-energetic means one is sick.

              – ab2
              10 mins ago











              0














              While not sure about the medical backing, from personal experience I once had HAPE and my oxygen reached 62% SpO2 by the time I was at the ER. I had one of those style canisters and I think it definitely helped during the 45 min between buying it and getting to the ER. I was using it fairly constantly during that time period though not just a single air shot as you see advertised. While I can't say conclusively what my SpO2 level would have been, it possibly would have been lower than 62%.






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor



              noah is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.























                0














                While not sure about the medical backing, from personal experience I once had HAPE and my oxygen reached 62% SpO2 by the time I was at the ER. I had one of those style canisters and I think it definitely helped during the 45 min between buying it and getting to the ER. I was using it fairly constantly during that time period though not just a single air shot as you see advertised. While I can't say conclusively what my SpO2 level would have been, it possibly would have been lower than 62%.






                share|improve this answer








                New contributor



                noah is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                  0












                  0








                  0







                  While not sure about the medical backing, from personal experience I once had HAPE and my oxygen reached 62% SpO2 by the time I was at the ER. I had one of those style canisters and I think it definitely helped during the 45 min between buying it and getting to the ER. I was using it fairly constantly during that time period though not just a single air shot as you see advertised. While I can't say conclusively what my SpO2 level would have been, it possibly would have been lower than 62%.






                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor



                  noah is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  While not sure about the medical backing, from personal experience I once had HAPE and my oxygen reached 62% SpO2 by the time I was at the ER. I had one of those style canisters and I think it definitely helped during the 45 min between buying it and getting to the ER. I was using it fairly constantly during that time period though not just a single air shot as you see advertised. While I can't say conclusively what my SpO2 level would have been, it possibly would have been lower than 62%.







                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor



                  noah is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.








                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer






                  New contributor



                  noah is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.








                  answered 5 hours ago









                  noahnoah

                  11 bronze badge




                  11 bronze badge




                  New contributor



                  noah is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.




                  New contributor




                  noah is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to The Great Outdoors Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2foutdoors.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f22441%2fis-there-any-evidence-that-the-small-canisters-10-liters-of-95-oxygen-actuall%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                      Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                      Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її