Can you open the door or die?A game of Green JackSearching for a secret doorColored Pills MADNESSFind the correct door!The Monty Hall Arena12 Birds in the petshopCan you open the bathroom door?Hacking an electronic keypad v233 stones into gold transmuterWhat is the optimal strategy for this triangular board game?

Why does there seem to be an extreme lack of public trashcans in Taiwan?

Print "N NE E SE S SW W NW"

How do I type a hyphen in iOS 12?

Problem with pronounciation

Why did the World Bank set the global poverty line at $1.90?

C++ logging library

Suppose leased car is totalled: what are financial implications?

Why are ambiguous grammars bad?

How can powerful telekinesis avoid violating Newton's 3rd Law?

Why would a home insurer offer a discount based on credit score?

Why is my power MOSFET heating up when on?

What do I need to do, tax-wise, for a sudden windfall?

What plausible reason could I give for my FTL drive only working in space

How to change the headfont of newtheorem environments to match komascript font?

How much web presence should I have?

Who is "He that flies" in Lord of the Rings?

What would the consequences be of a high number of solar systems being within close proximity to one another?

What does this line mean in Zelazny's "The Courts of Chaos"?

Why do the TIE Fighter pilot helmets have similar ridges as the rebels?

Can I use 220 V outlets on a 15 ampere breaker and wire it up as 110 V?

Why do I seem to lose data using this bash pipe construction?

When to use и or а as “and”?

Dedicated bike GPS computer over smartphone

Placement of positioning lights on A320 winglets



Can you open the door or die?


A game of Green JackSearching for a secret doorColored Pills MADNESSFind the correct door!The Monty Hall Arena12 Birds in the petshopCan you open the bathroom door?Hacking an electronic keypad v233 stones into gold transmuterWhat is the optimal strategy for this triangular board game?













2












$begingroup$


You wake up and you found yourself in a very strange room where there is a single door in it. and you found a note on the ground with lots of cards around it:



"There are 66 green and 66 blue door cards on the ground, if you put one blue and one green cards into the slots next to the door, the door will open. If you put the same color, you will hear a fail sound and lose a life! I won't tell you how many lifes you have, but you will die if you fail more than that!"



it would only require one try normally but you remember that you cannot distinguish the color of the stones, especially when they are green and blue because you are colorblind!, and probably whoever put you there knows this very well and that guy also knows what would be the minimum number of tries you need to open the door guaranteed as well so



Can you open it in time?



if so




How many tries do you need to open the door guaranteed?










share











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Can I get the cards back after an attempt?
    $endgroup$
    – cinico
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @cinico of course
    $endgroup$
    – Oray
    6 hours ago















2












$begingroup$


You wake up and you found yourself in a very strange room where there is a single door in it. and you found a note on the ground with lots of cards around it:



"There are 66 green and 66 blue door cards on the ground, if you put one blue and one green cards into the slots next to the door, the door will open. If you put the same color, you will hear a fail sound and lose a life! I won't tell you how many lifes you have, but you will die if you fail more than that!"



it would only require one try normally but you remember that you cannot distinguish the color of the stones, especially when they are green and blue because you are colorblind!, and probably whoever put you there knows this very well and that guy also knows what would be the minimum number of tries you need to open the door guaranteed as well so



Can you open it in time?



if so




How many tries do you need to open the door guaranteed?










share











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Can I get the cards back after an attempt?
    $endgroup$
    – cinico
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @cinico of course
    $endgroup$
    – Oray
    6 hours ago













2












2








2


1



$begingroup$


You wake up and you found yourself in a very strange room where there is a single door in it. and you found a note on the ground with lots of cards around it:



"There are 66 green and 66 blue door cards on the ground, if you put one blue and one green cards into the slots next to the door, the door will open. If you put the same color, you will hear a fail sound and lose a life! I won't tell you how many lifes you have, but you will die if you fail more than that!"



it would only require one try normally but you remember that you cannot distinguish the color of the stones, especially when they are green and blue because you are colorblind!, and probably whoever put you there knows this very well and that guy also knows what would be the minimum number of tries you need to open the door guaranteed as well so



Can you open it in time?



if so




How many tries do you need to open the door guaranteed?










share











$endgroup$




You wake up and you found yourself in a very strange room where there is a single door in it. and you found a note on the ground with lots of cards around it:



"There are 66 green and 66 blue door cards on the ground, if you put one blue and one green cards into the slots next to the door, the door will open. If you put the same color, you will hear a fail sound and lose a life! I won't tell you how many lifes you have, but you will die if you fail more than that!"



it would only require one try normally but you remember that you cannot distinguish the color of the stones, especially when they are green and blue because you are colorblind!, and probably whoever put you there knows this very well and that guy also knows what would be the minimum number of tries you need to open the door guaranteed as well so



Can you open it in time?



if so




How many tries do you need to open the door guaranteed?








logical-deduction strategy optimization





share














share












share



share








edited 7 hours ago







Oray

















asked 8 hours ago









OrayOray

16.5k438165




16.5k438165











  • $begingroup$
    Can I get the cards back after an attempt?
    $endgroup$
    – cinico
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @cinico of course
    $endgroup$
    – Oray
    6 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Can I get the cards back after an attempt?
    $endgroup$
    – cinico
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @cinico of course
    $endgroup$
    – Oray
    6 hours ago















$begingroup$
Can I get the cards back after an attempt?
$endgroup$
– cinico
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
Can I get the cards back after an attempt?
$endgroup$
– cinico
6 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@cinico of course
$endgroup$
– Oray
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
@cinico of course
$endgroup$
– Oray
6 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

I believe I can open it in




66




The reasoning behind it is:




The general strategy I'll be using is just brute-forcing a single card against all others. Pick a card, this'll be the "master" card you'll always use. Then you simply test the master card with another card up to 66 times. If it doesn't work, than you toss out the non-master card, and repeat.

As there are an equal number of green and blue cards (66), we can solve it the same regardless of the first card you chose.

So say your first card is green, then the worst case is that you fail your first 65 tries by getting 65 greens in a row. Then on the 66th try you're guaranteed to have a matching blue card since there are no green cards remaining besides the one in your hand.

The argument applies in exactly the same way if you chose a blue card first, just with blue cards instead.







share|improve this answer








New contributor



Jay is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Ooo, I like it! I'll have to think more on it (Sorry, my discrete math's a bit rough around the edges)
    $endgroup$
    – Jay
    7 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This seems far too simple to be the answer, but I can't think of a better one.
    $endgroup$
    – Christian
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I think you can do it in less if you do it in pairs. I'll try to organize this idea and write up an answer
    $endgroup$
    – João Bravo
    6 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    seems i did something wrong with my assumptions and failed with question, this answer seems quite right to me now... :/ sorry...
    $endgroup$
    – Oray
    6 hours ago


















1












$begingroup$

This is like a reverse puzzle to the well-known




"How often do you have to break a chocolate apart to end up with 24 pieces?" - The answer is 23 because every act of breaking - no matter how - increases the number of pieces by exactly one




Here in reverse:




Any failed attempt with two cards in effect only tells you that these two cards have the same colour. As they are henceforth equivalent, you can as well dispose one of them - or to stay in the spirit of the chocolate puzzle, glue them together to a larger monochromatic card cluster.
The only move that guarantees that the door opens is when you would upon failure produce a card cluster of 67 or more cards (as a cluster of this size cannot be monochromatic). But producing a cluster of size 67 is easily possible in many different ways with 66 moves, but definitely not with less than 66 moves (cf. chocolate puzzle)





A remark as a thinking outside the box solution:




Most cases of colour blindness are red-green blindness and as far as I know can distinguish blue from green ;)







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As a colorblind person myself, I can confirm that yes, I can generally distinguish blue from green. That said, if the green is slightly blue-tinted or vice versa, the two colors would look a lot more similar to me than they would for a normal-sighted person. In general, for a colorblind person, all colors look a bit more like other colors than they should (with the exception of red and green, which look a lot more like each other than they should). So it's possible that the cards are shades of blue and green that would stump only colorblind people.
    $endgroup$
    – Gilad M
    5 hours ago


















-2












$begingroup$

If I can get the cards back after an attempt




the minimum number of tries to open the door is 3. Pick 3 cards. Worst case scenario is: you pick green and blue for the first attempt; then you pick one of the first and test it against the third, which fails. Then, you know that the third card will match the card unpicked on the second attempt and you can open the door.




Otherwise,




It is not guaranteed that you can open the door, because there is a chance that you will always pick different colors for the 66 attempts.







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    This is the right answer, but to a different question (the left and right sock problem). Read again, what condition opens the door.
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I'm must be slower than usual today, because I don't understand what I misunderstood from the conditions
    $endgroup$
    – cinico
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You are thinking that equal colors will open the door. They must be different
    $endgroup$
    – João Bravo
    5 hours ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f84899%2fcan-you-open-the-door-or-die%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5












$begingroup$

I believe I can open it in




66




The reasoning behind it is:




The general strategy I'll be using is just brute-forcing a single card against all others. Pick a card, this'll be the "master" card you'll always use. Then you simply test the master card with another card up to 66 times. If it doesn't work, than you toss out the non-master card, and repeat.

As there are an equal number of green and blue cards (66), we can solve it the same regardless of the first card you chose.

So say your first card is green, then the worst case is that you fail your first 65 tries by getting 65 greens in a row. Then on the 66th try you're guaranteed to have a matching blue card since there are no green cards remaining besides the one in your hand.

The argument applies in exactly the same way if you chose a blue card first, just with blue cards instead.







share|improve this answer








New contributor



Jay is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Ooo, I like it! I'll have to think more on it (Sorry, my discrete math's a bit rough around the edges)
    $endgroup$
    – Jay
    7 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This seems far too simple to be the answer, but I can't think of a better one.
    $endgroup$
    – Christian
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I think you can do it in less if you do it in pairs. I'll try to organize this idea and write up an answer
    $endgroup$
    – João Bravo
    6 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    seems i did something wrong with my assumptions and failed with question, this answer seems quite right to me now... :/ sorry...
    $endgroup$
    – Oray
    6 hours ago















5












$begingroup$

I believe I can open it in




66




The reasoning behind it is:




The general strategy I'll be using is just brute-forcing a single card against all others. Pick a card, this'll be the "master" card you'll always use. Then you simply test the master card with another card up to 66 times. If it doesn't work, than you toss out the non-master card, and repeat.

As there are an equal number of green and blue cards (66), we can solve it the same regardless of the first card you chose.

So say your first card is green, then the worst case is that you fail your first 65 tries by getting 65 greens in a row. Then on the 66th try you're guaranteed to have a matching blue card since there are no green cards remaining besides the one in your hand.

The argument applies in exactly the same way if you chose a blue card first, just with blue cards instead.







share|improve this answer








New contributor



Jay is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Ooo, I like it! I'll have to think more on it (Sorry, my discrete math's a bit rough around the edges)
    $endgroup$
    – Jay
    7 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This seems far too simple to be the answer, but I can't think of a better one.
    $endgroup$
    – Christian
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I think you can do it in less if you do it in pairs. I'll try to organize this idea and write up an answer
    $endgroup$
    – João Bravo
    6 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    seems i did something wrong with my assumptions and failed with question, this answer seems quite right to me now... :/ sorry...
    $endgroup$
    – Oray
    6 hours ago













5












5








5





$begingroup$

I believe I can open it in




66




The reasoning behind it is:




The general strategy I'll be using is just brute-forcing a single card against all others. Pick a card, this'll be the "master" card you'll always use. Then you simply test the master card with another card up to 66 times. If it doesn't work, than you toss out the non-master card, and repeat.

As there are an equal number of green and blue cards (66), we can solve it the same regardless of the first card you chose.

So say your first card is green, then the worst case is that you fail your first 65 tries by getting 65 greens in a row. Then on the 66th try you're guaranteed to have a matching blue card since there are no green cards remaining besides the one in your hand.

The argument applies in exactly the same way if you chose a blue card first, just with blue cards instead.







share|improve this answer








New contributor



Jay is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





$endgroup$



I believe I can open it in




66




The reasoning behind it is:




The general strategy I'll be using is just brute-forcing a single card against all others. Pick a card, this'll be the "master" card you'll always use. Then you simply test the master card with another card up to 66 times. If it doesn't work, than you toss out the non-master card, and repeat.

As there are an equal number of green and blue cards (66), we can solve it the same regardless of the first card you chose.

So say your first card is green, then the worst case is that you fail your first 65 tries by getting 65 greens in a row. Then on the 66th try you're guaranteed to have a matching blue card since there are no green cards remaining besides the one in your hand.

The argument applies in exactly the same way if you chose a blue card first, just with blue cards instead.








share|improve this answer








New contributor



Jay is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer






New contributor



Jay is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








answered 7 hours ago









JayJay

661




661




New contributor



Jay is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




Jay is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













  • $begingroup$
    Ooo, I like it! I'll have to think more on it (Sorry, my discrete math's a bit rough around the edges)
    $endgroup$
    – Jay
    7 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This seems far too simple to be the answer, but I can't think of a better one.
    $endgroup$
    – Christian
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I think you can do it in less if you do it in pairs. I'll try to organize this idea and write up an answer
    $endgroup$
    – João Bravo
    6 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    seems i did something wrong with my assumptions and failed with question, this answer seems quite right to me now... :/ sorry...
    $endgroup$
    – Oray
    6 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Ooo, I like it! I'll have to think more on it (Sorry, my discrete math's a bit rough around the edges)
    $endgroup$
    – Jay
    7 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This seems far too simple to be the answer, but I can't think of a better one.
    $endgroup$
    – Christian
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I think you can do it in less if you do it in pairs. I'll try to organize this idea and write up an answer
    $endgroup$
    – João Bravo
    6 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    seems i did something wrong with my assumptions and failed with question, this answer seems quite right to me now... :/ sorry...
    $endgroup$
    – Oray
    6 hours ago















$begingroup$
Ooo, I like it! I'll have to think more on it (Sorry, my discrete math's a bit rough around the edges)
$endgroup$
– Jay
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
Ooo, I like it! I'll have to think more on it (Sorry, my discrete math's a bit rough around the edges)
$endgroup$
– Jay
7 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
This seems far too simple to be the answer, but I can't think of a better one.
$endgroup$
– Christian
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
This seems far too simple to be the answer, but I can't think of a better one.
$endgroup$
– Christian
7 hours ago












$begingroup$
I think you can do it in less if you do it in pairs. I'll try to organize this idea and write up an answer
$endgroup$
– João Bravo
6 hours ago





$begingroup$
I think you can do it in less if you do it in pairs. I'll try to organize this idea and write up an answer
$endgroup$
– João Bravo
6 hours ago













$begingroup$
seems i did something wrong with my assumptions and failed with question, this answer seems quite right to me now... :/ sorry...
$endgroup$
– Oray
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
seems i did something wrong with my assumptions and failed with question, this answer seems quite right to me now... :/ sorry...
$endgroup$
– Oray
6 hours ago











1












$begingroup$

This is like a reverse puzzle to the well-known




"How often do you have to break a chocolate apart to end up with 24 pieces?" - The answer is 23 because every act of breaking - no matter how - increases the number of pieces by exactly one




Here in reverse:




Any failed attempt with two cards in effect only tells you that these two cards have the same colour. As they are henceforth equivalent, you can as well dispose one of them - or to stay in the spirit of the chocolate puzzle, glue them together to a larger monochromatic card cluster.
The only move that guarantees that the door opens is when you would upon failure produce a card cluster of 67 or more cards (as a cluster of this size cannot be monochromatic). But producing a cluster of size 67 is easily possible in many different ways with 66 moves, but definitely not with less than 66 moves (cf. chocolate puzzle)





A remark as a thinking outside the box solution:




Most cases of colour blindness are red-green blindness and as far as I know can distinguish blue from green ;)







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As a colorblind person myself, I can confirm that yes, I can generally distinguish blue from green. That said, if the green is slightly blue-tinted or vice versa, the two colors would look a lot more similar to me than they would for a normal-sighted person. In general, for a colorblind person, all colors look a bit more like other colors than they should (with the exception of red and green, which look a lot more like each other than they should). So it's possible that the cards are shades of blue and green that would stump only colorblind people.
    $endgroup$
    – Gilad M
    5 hours ago















1












$begingroup$

This is like a reverse puzzle to the well-known




"How often do you have to break a chocolate apart to end up with 24 pieces?" - The answer is 23 because every act of breaking - no matter how - increases the number of pieces by exactly one




Here in reverse:




Any failed attempt with two cards in effect only tells you that these two cards have the same colour. As they are henceforth equivalent, you can as well dispose one of them - or to stay in the spirit of the chocolate puzzle, glue them together to a larger monochromatic card cluster.
The only move that guarantees that the door opens is when you would upon failure produce a card cluster of 67 or more cards (as a cluster of this size cannot be monochromatic). But producing a cluster of size 67 is easily possible in many different ways with 66 moves, but definitely not with less than 66 moves (cf. chocolate puzzle)





A remark as a thinking outside the box solution:




Most cases of colour blindness are red-green blindness and as far as I know can distinguish blue from green ;)







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As a colorblind person myself, I can confirm that yes, I can generally distinguish blue from green. That said, if the green is slightly blue-tinted or vice versa, the two colors would look a lot more similar to me than they would for a normal-sighted person. In general, for a colorblind person, all colors look a bit more like other colors than they should (with the exception of red and green, which look a lot more like each other than they should). So it's possible that the cards are shades of blue and green that would stump only colorblind people.
    $endgroup$
    – Gilad M
    5 hours ago













1












1








1





$begingroup$

This is like a reverse puzzle to the well-known




"How often do you have to break a chocolate apart to end up with 24 pieces?" - The answer is 23 because every act of breaking - no matter how - increases the number of pieces by exactly one




Here in reverse:




Any failed attempt with two cards in effect only tells you that these two cards have the same colour. As they are henceforth equivalent, you can as well dispose one of them - or to stay in the spirit of the chocolate puzzle, glue them together to a larger monochromatic card cluster.
The only move that guarantees that the door opens is when you would upon failure produce a card cluster of 67 or more cards (as a cluster of this size cannot be monochromatic). But producing a cluster of size 67 is easily possible in many different ways with 66 moves, but definitely not with less than 66 moves (cf. chocolate puzzle)





A remark as a thinking outside the box solution:




Most cases of colour blindness are red-green blindness and as far as I know can distinguish blue from green ;)







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



This is like a reverse puzzle to the well-known




"How often do you have to break a chocolate apart to end up with 24 pieces?" - The answer is 23 because every act of breaking - no matter how - increases the number of pieces by exactly one




Here in reverse:




Any failed attempt with two cards in effect only tells you that these two cards have the same colour. As they are henceforth equivalent, you can as well dispose one of them - or to stay in the spirit of the chocolate puzzle, glue them together to a larger monochromatic card cluster.
The only move that guarantees that the door opens is when you would upon failure produce a card cluster of 67 or more cards (as a cluster of this size cannot be monochromatic). But producing a cluster of size 67 is easily possible in many different ways with 66 moves, but definitely not with less than 66 moves (cf. chocolate puzzle)





A remark as a thinking outside the box solution:




Most cases of colour blindness are red-green blindness and as far as I know can distinguish blue from green ;)








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 6 hours ago

























answered 6 hours ago









Hagen von EitzenHagen von Eitzen

40627




40627







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As a colorblind person myself, I can confirm that yes, I can generally distinguish blue from green. That said, if the green is slightly blue-tinted or vice versa, the two colors would look a lot more similar to me than they would for a normal-sighted person. In general, for a colorblind person, all colors look a bit more like other colors than they should (with the exception of red and green, which look a lot more like each other than they should). So it's possible that the cards are shades of blue and green that would stump only colorblind people.
    $endgroup$
    – Gilad M
    5 hours ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As a colorblind person myself, I can confirm that yes, I can generally distinguish blue from green. That said, if the green is slightly blue-tinted or vice versa, the two colors would look a lot more similar to me than they would for a normal-sighted person. In general, for a colorblind person, all colors look a bit more like other colors than they should (with the exception of red and green, which look a lot more like each other than they should). So it's possible that the cards are shades of blue and green that would stump only colorblind people.
    $endgroup$
    – Gilad M
    5 hours ago







1




1




$begingroup$
As a colorblind person myself, I can confirm that yes, I can generally distinguish blue from green. That said, if the green is slightly blue-tinted or vice versa, the two colors would look a lot more similar to me than they would for a normal-sighted person. In general, for a colorblind person, all colors look a bit more like other colors than they should (with the exception of red and green, which look a lot more like each other than they should). So it's possible that the cards are shades of blue and green that would stump only colorblind people.
$endgroup$
– Gilad M
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
As a colorblind person myself, I can confirm that yes, I can generally distinguish blue from green. That said, if the green is slightly blue-tinted or vice versa, the two colors would look a lot more similar to me than they would for a normal-sighted person. In general, for a colorblind person, all colors look a bit more like other colors than they should (with the exception of red and green, which look a lot more like each other than they should). So it's possible that the cards are shades of blue and green that would stump only colorblind people.
$endgroup$
– Gilad M
5 hours ago











-2












$begingroup$

If I can get the cards back after an attempt




the minimum number of tries to open the door is 3. Pick 3 cards. Worst case scenario is: you pick green and blue for the first attempt; then you pick one of the first and test it against the third, which fails. Then, you know that the third card will match the card unpicked on the second attempt and you can open the door.




Otherwise,




It is not guaranteed that you can open the door, because there is a chance that you will always pick different colors for the 66 attempts.







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    This is the right answer, but to a different question (the left and right sock problem). Read again, what condition opens the door.
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I'm must be slower than usual today, because I don't understand what I misunderstood from the conditions
    $endgroup$
    – cinico
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You are thinking that equal colors will open the door. They must be different
    $endgroup$
    – João Bravo
    5 hours ago















-2












$begingroup$

If I can get the cards back after an attempt




the minimum number of tries to open the door is 3. Pick 3 cards. Worst case scenario is: you pick green and blue for the first attempt; then you pick one of the first and test it against the third, which fails. Then, you know that the third card will match the card unpicked on the second attempt and you can open the door.




Otherwise,




It is not guaranteed that you can open the door, because there is a chance that you will always pick different colors for the 66 attempts.







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    This is the right answer, but to a different question (the left and right sock problem). Read again, what condition opens the door.
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I'm must be slower than usual today, because I don't understand what I misunderstood from the conditions
    $endgroup$
    – cinico
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You are thinking that equal colors will open the door. They must be different
    $endgroup$
    – João Bravo
    5 hours ago













-2












-2








-2





$begingroup$

If I can get the cards back after an attempt




the minimum number of tries to open the door is 3. Pick 3 cards. Worst case scenario is: you pick green and blue for the first attempt; then you pick one of the first and test it against the third, which fails. Then, you know that the third card will match the card unpicked on the second attempt and you can open the door.




Otherwise,




It is not guaranteed that you can open the door, because there is a chance that you will always pick different colors for the 66 attempts.







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



If I can get the cards back after an attempt




the minimum number of tries to open the door is 3. Pick 3 cards. Worst case scenario is: you pick green and blue for the first attempt; then you pick one of the first and test it against the third, which fails. Then, you know that the third card will match the card unpicked on the second attempt and you can open the door.




Otherwise,




It is not guaranteed that you can open the door, because there is a chance that you will always pick different colors for the 66 attempts.








share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 6 hours ago









cinicocinico

27416




27416







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    This is the right answer, but to a different question (the left and right sock problem). Read again, what condition opens the door.
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I'm must be slower than usual today, because I don't understand what I misunderstood from the conditions
    $endgroup$
    – cinico
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You are thinking that equal colors will open the door. They must be different
    $endgroup$
    – João Bravo
    5 hours ago












  • 3




    $begingroup$
    This is the right answer, but to a different question (the left and right sock problem). Read again, what condition opens the door.
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I'm must be slower than usual today, because I don't understand what I misunderstood from the conditions
    $endgroup$
    – cinico
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You are thinking that equal colors will open the door. They must be different
    $endgroup$
    – João Bravo
    5 hours ago







3




3




$begingroup$
This is the right answer, but to a different question (the left and right sock problem). Read again, what condition opens the door.
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
This is the right answer, but to a different question (the left and right sock problem). Read again, what condition opens the door.
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
6 hours ago












$begingroup$
I'm must be slower than usual today, because I don't understand what I misunderstood from the conditions
$endgroup$
– cinico
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
I'm must be slower than usual today, because I don't understand what I misunderstood from the conditions
$endgroup$
– cinico
5 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
You are thinking that equal colors will open the door. They must be different
$endgroup$
– João Bravo
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
You are thinking that equal colors will open the door. They must be different
$endgroup$
– João Bravo
5 hours ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f84899%2fcan-you-open-the-door-or-die%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її