Would the Disguise Self spell be able to reveal hidden birthmarks/tattoos (of the person they're disguised as) to a character?What is the source of the “spells do only what they say they do” rules interpretation principle?Is Alter Self strictly better than Disguise Self as at-will invocations?Can disguise self give advantage in attacksDoes the Disguise Self spell change the caster's voice?How to disguise a Devil as a HumanCan you create an illusion of empty space?Taking 5th Edition D&D Spells into 4th Edition D&DCan the effects of Alter Self and Disguise Self be combined to make you look like a specific person?If you cast Disguise Self and then Project Image, is the illusory copy from Project Image disguised?Is there an item or spell to see through the Disguise Self spell?What are the consequences of playing a non-combat-oriented bard in an underdark campaign?

Why Isn’t SQL More Refactorable?

Did we get closer to another plane than we were supposed to, or was the pilot just protecting our delicate sensibilities?

How should I tell my manager I'm not paying for an optional after work event I'm not going to?

As matter approaches a black hole, does it speed up?

Are there any Final Fantasy Spirits in Super Smash Bros Ultimate?

Why isn't nylon as strong as kevlar?

Lie super algebra presentation of the Kähler identities

I drew a randomly colored grid of points with tikz, how do I force it to remember the first grid from then on?

Which module had more 'comfort' in terms of living space, the Lunar Module or the Command module?

Getting a W on your transcript for grad school applications

Can a nothic's Weird Insight action discover secrets about a player character that the character doesn't know about themselves?

How does this change to the opportunity attack rule impact combat?

How do I tell my manager that his code review comment is wrong?

Expressing 'our' for objects belonging to our apartment

Shantae Dance Matching

What does a spell range of "25 ft. + 5 ft./2 levels" mean?

Why do only some White Walkers shatter into ice chips?

Can there be a single technologically advanced nation, in a continent full of non-technologically advanced nations?

Manager is threatening to grade me poorly if I don't complete the project

If I readied a spell with the trigger "When I take damage", do I have to make a constitution saving throw to avoid losing Concentration?

How can I close a gap between my fence and my neighbor's that's on his side of the property line?

Position of past participle and extent of the Verbklammer

How to apply differences on part of a list and keep the rest

How to change lightning-radio-group selected value programmatically?



Would the Disguise Self spell be able to reveal hidden birthmarks/tattoos (of the person they're disguised as) to a character?


What is the source of the “spells do only what they say they do” rules interpretation principle?Is Alter Self strictly better than Disguise Self as at-will invocations?Can disguise self give advantage in attacksDoes the Disguise Self spell change the caster's voice?How to disguise a Devil as a HumanCan you create an illusion of empty space?Taking 5th Edition D&D Spells into 4th Edition D&DCan the effects of Alter Self and Disguise Self be combined to make you look like a specific person?If you cast Disguise Self and then Project Image, is the illusory copy from Project Image disguised?Is there an item or spell to see through the Disguise Self spell?What are the consequences of playing a non-combat-oriented bard in an underdark campaign?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2












$begingroup$


I wanted to know in case I had ever wanted to have an NPC that has a hidden birthmark and I didn't want the players to just guess it.



Waybe what I really wanna know is if the illusion in Disguise Self is based on what the player sees or what they say.



If they said "I appear as Lady Morticia," would they be able to know that Lady Morticia has (for example) a third nipple?










share|improve this question









New contributor




pizzadog is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    3 hours ago

















2












$begingroup$


I wanted to know in case I had ever wanted to have an NPC that has a hidden birthmark and I didn't want the players to just guess it.



Waybe what I really wanna know is if the illusion in Disguise Self is based on what the player sees or what they say.



If they said "I appear as Lady Morticia," would they be able to know that Lady Morticia has (for example) a third nipple?










share|improve this question









New contributor




pizzadog is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    3 hours ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$


I wanted to know in case I had ever wanted to have an NPC that has a hidden birthmark and I didn't want the players to just guess it.



Waybe what I really wanna know is if the illusion in Disguise Self is based on what the player sees or what they say.



If they said "I appear as Lady Morticia," would they be able to know that Lady Morticia has (for example) a third nipple?










share|improve this question









New contributor




pizzadog is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




I wanted to know in case I had ever wanted to have an NPC that has a hidden birthmark and I didn't want the players to just guess it.



Waybe what I really wanna know is if the illusion in Disguise Self is based on what the player sees or what they say.



If they said "I appear as Lady Morticia," would they be able to know that Lady Morticia has (for example) a third nipple?







dnd-5e spells illusion disguise






share|improve this question









New contributor




pizzadog is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




pizzadog is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago









V2Blast

28.5k5103173




28.5k5103173






New contributor




pizzadog is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 4 hours ago









pizzadogpizzadog

111




111




New contributor




pizzadog is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





pizzadog is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






pizzadog is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    3 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    3 hours ago















$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
3 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

No, disguise self doesn't grant the caster any knowledge.



The disguise self spell description says:




You make yourself--including your clothing, armor, weapons, and other belongings on your person--look different until the spell ends or until you use your action to dismiss it. You can seem 1 foot shorter or taller and can appear thin, fat, or in between. You can't change your body type, so you must adopt a form that has the same basic arrangement of limbs. Otherwise, the extent of the illusion is up to you.




Spells do what they say they do. No part of the spell description tells you that you gain any knowledge - it simply says you can make yourself look different.



You can choose exactly what you look like within the limits of the spell description, so you could emulate the appearance of any roughly humanoid (in terms of body type) creature of relatively similar height to the best of your knowledge - but people can't copy things they don't know about.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I feel like the key line is "the extent of the illusion is up to you". You control the illusion (outside of certain restrictions) - there's no special spell intelligence that can shape the illusion beyond what you choose
    $endgroup$
    – divibisan
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @divibisan: Pretty much. It doesn't magically copy someone else's appearance completely; it magically disguises you in ways that you specifically choose.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    It is also Illusion not Divination, I know schools took a serious backseat in this edition but they are still there even if they break those rules with Polymorph and Goodberry.
    $endgroup$
    – Slagmoth
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    While I agree with the ruling, it's interesting that often people short-hand it like the example "I appear as Lady Morticia" in OP's question when the spell designates "The extent of the illusion is up to you". It's an interesting precedent to set that the magic can be the exact same spell that a different person casts, but the effects are based entirely on each caster's perception of the thing they're conjuring. Basically only important here to bring it up with whatever specific circumstances OP might be able to use with it.
    $endgroup$
    – Tyler Mackey
    13 mins ago












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






pizzadog is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f147268%2fwould-the-disguise-self-spell-be-able-to-reveal-hidden-birthmarks-tattoos-of-th%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









6












$begingroup$

No, disguise self doesn't grant the caster any knowledge.



The disguise self spell description says:




You make yourself--including your clothing, armor, weapons, and other belongings on your person--look different until the spell ends or until you use your action to dismiss it. You can seem 1 foot shorter or taller and can appear thin, fat, or in between. You can't change your body type, so you must adopt a form that has the same basic arrangement of limbs. Otherwise, the extent of the illusion is up to you.




Spells do what they say they do. No part of the spell description tells you that you gain any knowledge - it simply says you can make yourself look different.



You can choose exactly what you look like within the limits of the spell description, so you could emulate the appearance of any roughly humanoid (in terms of body type) creature of relatively similar height to the best of your knowledge - but people can't copy things they don't know about.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I feel like the key line is "the extent of the illusion is up to you". You control the illusion (outside of certain restrictions) - there's no special spell intelligence that can shape the illusion beyond what you choose
    $endgroup$
    – divibisan
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @divibisan: Pretty much. It doesn't magically copy someone else's appearance completely; it magically disguises you in ways that you specifically choose.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    It is also Illusion not Divination, I know schools took a serious backseat in this edition but they are still there even if they break those rules with Polymorph and Goodberry.
    $endgroup$
    – Slagmoth
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    While I agree with the ruling, it's interesting that often people short-hand it like the example "I appear as Lady Morticia" in OP's question when the spell designates "The extent of the illusion is up to you". It's an interesting precedent to set that the magic can be the exact same spell that a different person casts, but the effects are based entirely on each caster's perception of the thing they're conjuring. Basically only important here to bring it up with whatever specific circumstances OP might be able to use with it.
    $endgroup$
    – Tyler Mackey
    13 mins ago
















6












$begingroup$

No, disguise self doesn't grant the caster any knowledge.



The disguise self spell description says:




You make yourself--including your clothing, armor, weapons, and other belongings on your person--look different until the spell ends or until you use your action to dismiss it. You can seem 1 foot shorter or taller and can appear thin, fat, or in between. You can't change your body type, so you must adopt a form that has the same basic arrangement of limbs. Otherwise, the extent of the illusion is up to you.




Spells do what they say they do. No part of the spell description tells you that you gain any knowledge - it simply says you can make yourself look different.



You can choose exactly what you look like within the limits of the spell description, so you could emulate the appearance of any roughly humanoid (in terms of body type) creature of relatively similar height to the best of your knowledge - but people can't copy things they don't know about.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I feel like the key line is "the extent of the illusion is up to you". You control the illusion (outside of certain restrictions) - there's no special spell intelligence that can shape the illusion beyond what you choose
    $endgroup$
    – divibisan
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @divibisan: Pretty much. It doesn't magically copy someone else's appearance completely; it magically disguises you in ways that you specifically choose.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    It is also Illusion not Divination, I know schools took a serious backseat in this edition but they are still there even if they break those rules with Polymorph and Goodberry.
    $endgroup$
    – Slagmoth
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    While I agree with the ruling, it's interesting that often people short-hand it like the example "I appear as Lady Morticia" in OP's question when the spell designates "The extent of the illusion is up to you". It's an interesting precedent to set that the magic can be the exact same spell that a different person casts, but the effects are based entirely on each caster's perception of the thing they're conjuring. Basically only important here to bring it up with whatever specific circumstances OP might be able to use with it.
    $endgroup$
    – Tyler Mackey
    13 mins ago














6












6








6





$begingroup$

No, disguise self doesn't grant the caster any knowledge.



The disguise self spell description says:




You make yourself--including your clothing, armor, weapons, and other belongings on your person--look different until the spell ends or until you use your action to dismiss it. You can seem 1 foot shorter or taller and can appear thin, fat, or in between. You can't change your body type, so you must adopt a form that has the same basic arrangement of limbs. Otherwise, the extent of the illusion is up to you.




Spells do what they say they do. No part of the spell description tells you that you gain any knowledge - it simply says you can make yourself look different.



You can choose exactly what you look like within the limits of the spell description, so you could emulate the appearance of any roughly humanoid (in terms of body type) creature of relatively similar height to the best of your knowledge - but people can't copy things they don't know about.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



No, disguise self doesn't grant the caster any knowledge.



The disguise self spell description says:




You make yourself--including your clothing, armor, weapons, and other belongings on your person--look different until the spell ends or until you use your action to dismiss it. You can seem 1 foot shorter or taller and can appear thin, fat, or in between. You can't change your body type, so you must adopt a form that has the same basic arrangement of limbs. Otherwise, the extent of the illusion is up to you.




Spells do what they say they do. No part of the spell description tells you that you gain any knowledge - it simply says you can make yourself look different.



You can choose exactly what you look like within the limits of the spell description, so you could emulate the appearance of any roughly humanoid (in terms of body type) creature of relatively similar height to the best of your knowledge - but people can't copy things they don't know about.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 3 hours ago









V2BlastV2Blast

28.5k5103173




28.5k5103173











  • $begingroup$
    I feel like the key line is "the extent of the illusion is up to you". You control the illusion (outside of certain restrictions) - there's no special spell intelligence that can shape the illusion beyond what you choose
    $endgroup$
    – divibisan
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @divibisan: Pretty much. It doesn't magically copy someone else's appearance completely; it magically disguises you in ways that you specifically choose.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    It is also Illusion not Divination, I know schools took a serious backseat in this edition but they are still there even if they break those rules with Polymorph and Goodberry.
    $endgroup$
    – Slagmoth
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    While I agree with the ruling, it's interesting that often people short-hand it like the example "I appear as Lady Morticia" in OP's question when the spell designates "The extent of the illusion is up to you". It's an interesting precedent to set that the magic can be the exact same spell that a different person casts, but the effects are based entirely on each caster's perception of the thing they're conjuring. Basically only important here to bring it up with whatever specific circumstances OP might be able to use with it.
    $endgroup$
    – Tyler Mackey
    13 mins ago

















  • $begingroup$
    I feel like the key line is "the extent of the illusion is up to you". You control the illusion (outside of certain restrictions) - there's no special spell intelligence that can shape the illusion beyond what you choose
    $endgroup$
    – divibisan
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @divibisan: Pretty much. It doesn't magically copy someone else's appearance completely; it magically disguises you in ways that you specifically choose.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    It is also Illusion not Divination, I know schools took a serious backseat in this edition but they are still there even if they break those rules with Polymorph and Goodberry.
    $endgroup$
    – Slagmoth
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    While I agree with the ruling, it's interesting that often people short-hand it like the example "I appear as Lady Morticia" in OP's question when the spell designates "The extent of the illusion is up to you". It's an interesting precedent to set that the magic can be the exact same spell that a different person casts, but the effects are based entirely on each caster's perception of the thing they're conjuring. Basically only important here to bring it up with whatever specific circumstances OP might be able to use with it.
    $endgroup$
    – Tyler Mackey
    13 mins ago
















$begingroup$
I feel like the key line is "the extent of the illusion is up to you". You control the illusion (outside of certain restrictions) - there's no special spell intelligence that can shape the illusion beyond what you choose
$endgroup$
– divibisan
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
I feel like the key line is "the extent of the illusion is up to you". You control the illusion (outside of certain restrictions) - there's no special spell intelligence that can shape the illusion beyond what you choose
$endgroup$
– divibisan
3 hours ago












$begingroup$
@divibisan: Pretty much. It doesn't magically copy someone else's appearance completely; it magically disguises you in ways that you specifically choose.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
@divibisan: Pretty much. It doesn't magically copy someone else's appearance completely; it magically disguises you in ways that you specifically choose.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
3 hours ago












$begingroup$
It is also Illusion not Divination, I know schools took a serious backseat in this edition but they are still there even if they break those rules with Polymorph and Goodberry.
$endgroup$
– Slagmoth
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
It is also Illusion not Divination, I know schools took a serious backseat in this edition but they are still there even if they break those rules with Polymorph and Goodberry.
$endgroup$
– Slagmoth
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
While I agree with the ruling, it's interesting that often people short-hand it like the example "I appear as Lady Morticia" in OP's question when the spell designates "The extent of the illusion is up to you". It's an interesting precedent to set that the magic can be the exact same spell that a different person casts, but the effects are based entirely on each caster's perception of the thing they're conjuring. Basically only important here to bring it up with whatever specific circumstances OP might be able to use with it.
$endgroup$
– Tyler Mackey
13 mins ago





$begingroup$
While I agree with the ruling, it's interesting that often people short-hand it like the example "I appear as Lady Morticia" in OP's question when the spell designates "The extent of the illusion is up to you". It's an interesting precedent to set that the magic can be the exact same spell that a different person casts, but the effects are based entirely on each caster's perception of the thing they're conjuring. Basically only important here to bring it up with whatever specific circumstances OP might be able to use with it.
$endgroup$
– Tyler Mackey
13 mins ago











pizzadog is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















pizzadog is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












pizzadog is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











pizzadog is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f147268%2fwould-the-disguise-self-spell-be-able-to-reveal-hidden-birthmarks-tattoos-of-th%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

François Viète Contents Biography Work and thought Bibliography See also Notes Further reading External links Navigation menup. 21Google Bookspp. 75–77Google BooksDe thou (from University of Saint Andrews)ArchivedGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle booksGoogle Bookscc-parthenay.frL'histoire universelle (fr)Universal History (en)ArchivedAdsabs.harvard.eduPagesperso-orange.frArchive.orgChikara Sasaki. Descartes' mathematical thought p.259Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle Bookspp. 152 and onwardGoogle BooksGoogle BooksScribd.comGoogle Books1257-7979Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGallica.bnf.frGoogle BooksGoogle Books"François Viète"Francois Viète: Father of Modern Algebraic NotationThe Lawyer and the GamblerAbout TarporleySite de Jean-Paul GuichardL'algèbre nouvelle"About the Harmonicon"cb120511976(data)1188044800000 0001 0913 5903n82164680ola2013766880073431702w6vt1sb70287374827140948071409480