Will 700 more planes a day fly because of the Heathrow expansion?Were the Wright Brothers the first to fly?Why do we open the window shades during landing and take-off?During EAA Airventure Oshkosh, is Wittman Regional Airport the “world's busiest”?Did planes crash into the WTC on 9-11?Did Ukraine set up Russia on the MH17 incident?Can lightning bring down a plane?Was there a coordinated action on 9/11 to crash an unarmed F-16 into a hijacked plane?Did NATO Air Forces start shooting down Russian fighter jets?Do airlines in North America make around $10 profit per customer?Is travelling by car better for preventing climate change than by plane?

How does this change to the opportunity attack rule impact combat?

Set collection doesn't always enforce uniqueness with the Date datatype? Does the following example seem correct?

How should I tell my manager I'm not paying for an optional after work event I'm not going to?

Would Hubble Space Telescope improve black hole image observed by EHT if it joined array of telesopes?

Can my company stop me from working overtime?

What was the design of the Macintosh II's MMU replacement?

Why was the battle set up *outside* Winterfell?

How to apply differences on part of a list and keep the rest

Would glacier 'trees' be plausible?

Using a microphone from the 1930s

Multi-channel audio upsampling interpolation

What was the first instance of a "planet eater" in sci-fi?

How can I get a job without pushing my family's income into a higher tax bracket?

What property of a BJT transistor makes it an amplifier?

Why do people keep telling me that I am a bad photographer?

Understanding trademark infringements in a world where many dictionary words are trademarks?

Is there an idiom that support the idea that "inflation is bad"?

Missing Piece of Pie - Can you find it?

How to model the curly cable part of the phone

What does a spell range of "25 ft. + 5 ft./2 levels" mean?

How was the quadratic formula created?

Why Isn’t SQL More Refactorable?

Can hackers enable the camera after the user disabled it?

What are the advantages of luxury car brands like Acura/Lexus over their sibling non-luxury brands Honda/Toyota?



Will 700 more planes a day fly because of the Heathrow expansion?


Were the Wright Brothers the first to fly?Why do we open the window shades during landing and take-off?During EAA Airventure Oshkosh, is Wittman Regional Airport the “world's busiest”?Did planes crash into the WTC on 9-11?Did Ukraine set up Russia on the MH17 incident?Can lightning bring down a plane?Was there a coordinated action on 9/11 to crash an unarmed F-16 into a hijacked plane?Did NATO Air Forces start shooting down Russian fighter jets?Do airlines in North America make around $10 profit per customer?Is travelling by car better for preventing climate change than by plane?













2















Some people are protesting a proposed expansion of London Heathrow. I saw some protestors of the Heathrow expansion with signs that read "Stop 700 more planes a day".



Photo of protestors



Will 700 more planes a day fly because of the Heathrow expansion, as the signs imply?










share|improve this question









New contributor




J. D is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
























    2















    Some people are protesting a proposed expansion of London Heathrow. I saw some protestors of the Heathrow expansion with signs that read "Stop 700 more planes a day".



    Photo of protestors



    Will 700 more planes a day fly because of the Heathrow expansion, as the signs imply?










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    J. D is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      2












      2








      2








      Some people are protesting a proposed expansion of London Heathrow. I saw some protestors of the Heathrow expansion with signs that read "Stop 700 more planes a day".



      Photo of protestors



      Will 700 more planes a day fly because of the Heathrow expansion, as the signs imply?










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      J. D is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      Some people are protesting a proposed expansion of London Heathrow. I saw some protestors of the Heathrow expansion with signs that read "Stop 700 more planes a day".



      Photo of protestors



      Will 700 more planes a day fly because of the Heathrow expansion, as the signs imply?







      aviation






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      J. D is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      J. D is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 15 mins ago









      Barry Harrison

      3,59811355




      3,59811355






      New contributor




      J. D is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 3 hours ago









      J. DJ. D

      112




      112




      New contributor




      J. D is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      J. D is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      J. D is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          Heathrow Airport has a "dedicated website" for the planned creation of an additional runway. From the dedicated website (emphasis added):




          Heathrow Today



          • 98% capacity – Flight movements at Heathrow are capped at 480,000/year

          Heathrow Expansion:



          • 740,000 flight movements capacity



          Assuming the capacity in the expanded airport is still per year (as is explicitly stated on another Heathrow Airport website), there would be the capacity for an additional 260,000 flights per year. That is equivalent to ~712 flights per day offered by the additional capacity.



          OAG, "an air travel intelligence company," predicts a total of 140,556 air traffic movements (ATMs). Their report is pretty comprehensive and includes long-haul, short-haul, etc. A single departure (and arrival) counts as one ATM. Thus, the increase of 140,556 ATMs is equivalent to 385 additional flights per day. Equivalently, 54.1% of the additional capacity is expected to be used, and not 100%.



          To summarize:




          Would 700 more planes a day fly because of the Heathrow expansion, as the signs imply?




          Maybe. Probably not. The expansion will increase the airport capacity by 712 flights per day. This is not a guarantee that 712 extra flights will occur a day. In fact, an airline analysis company predicts just 385 additional flights per day. This figure is nowhere near 700.






          share|improve this answer






























            2














            Yes, assuming that the airport continues to run at 98% capacity or higher.



            According to Heathrowexpansion.com (a site apparently also owned by the airport), the expansion would have a "740,000 flight movements capacity" (per year for three runways) while currently the capacity is 480,000/year. This makes the math to figure out the new cap (740,000-480,000)/365 which is about 712 flights per day more than the previous cap. If they run at 98% capacity that makes it 698 flights per day extra.






            share|improve this answer


















            • 2





              But that's a big assumption to make when you've increased capacity by 50%.

              – Bob
              17 mins ago











            • @Bob Is the other answer correct? "Probably not." In bold. That is a strong statement.

              – J. D
              4 mins ago


















            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4














            Heathrow Airport has a "dedicated website" for the planned creation of an additional runway. From the dedicated website (emphasis added):




            Heathrow Today



            • 98% capacity – Flight movements at Heathrow are capped at 480,000/year

            Heathrow Expansion:



            • 740,000 flight movements capacity



            Assuming the capacity in the expanded airport is still per year (as is explicitly stated on another Heathrow Airport website), there would be the capacity for an additional 260,000 flights per year. That is equivalent to ~712 flights per day offered by the additional capacity.



            OAG, "an air travel intelligence company," predicts a total of 140,556 air traffic movements (ATMs). Their report is pretty comprehensive and includes long-haul, short-haul, etc. A single departure (and arrival) counts as one ATM. Thus, the increase of 140,556 ATMs is equivalent to 385 additional flights per day. Equivalently, 54.1% of the additional capacity is expected to be used, and not 100%.



            To summarize:




            Would 700 more planes a day fly because of the Heathrow expansion, as the signs imply?




            Maybe. Probably not. The expansion will increase the airport capacity by 712 flights per day. This is not a guarantee that 712 extra flights will occur a day. In fact, an airline analysis company predicts just 385 additional flights per day. This figure is nowhere near 700.






            share|improve this answer



























              4














              Heathrow Airport has a "dedicated website" for the planned creation of an additional runway. From the dedicated website (emphasis added):




              Heathrow Today



              • 98% capacity – Flight movements at Heathrow are capped at 480,000/year

              Heathrow Expansion:



              • 740,000 flight movements capacity



              Assuming the capacity in the expanded airport is still per year (as is explicitly stated on another Heathrow Airport website), there would be the capacity for an additional 260,000 flights per year. That is equivalent to ~712 flights per day offered by the additional capacity.



              OAG, "an air travel intelligence company," predicts a total of 140,556 air traffic movements (ATMs). Their report is pretty comprehensive and includes long-haul, short-haul, etc. A single departure (and arrival) counts as one ATM. Thus, the increase of 140,556 ATMs is equivalent to 385 additional flights per day. Equivalently, 54.1% of the additional capacity is expected to be used, and not 100%.



              To summarize:




              Would 700 more planes a day fly because of the Heathrow expansion, as the signs imply?




              Maybe. Probably not. The expansion will increase the airport capacity by 712 flights per day. This is not a guarantee that 712 extra flights will occur a day. In fact, an airline analysis company predicts just 385 additional flights per day. This figure is nowhere near 700.






              share|improve this answer

























                4












                4








                4







                Heathrow Airport has a "dedicated website" for the planned creation of an additional runway. From the dedicated website (emphasis added):




                Heathrow Today



                • 98% capacity – Flight movements at Heathrow are capped at 480,000/year

                Heathrow Expansion:



                • 740,000 flight movements capacity



                Assuming the capacity in the expanded airport is still per year (as is explicitly stated on another Heathrow Airport website), there would be the capacity for an additional 260,000 flights per year. That is equivalent to ~712 flights per day offered by the additional capacity.



                OAG, "an air travel intelligence company," predicts a total of 140,556 air traffic movements (ATMs). Their report is pretty comprehensive and includes long-haul, short-haul, etc. A single departure (and arrival) counts as one ATM. Thus, the increase of 140,556 ATMs is equivalent to 385 additional flights per day. Equivalently, 54.1% of the additional capacity is expected to be used, and not 100%.



                To summarize:




                Would 700 more planes a day fly because of the Heathrow expansion, as the signs imply?




                Maybe. Probably not. The expansion will increase the airport capacity by 712 flights per day. This is not a guarantee that 712 extra flights will occur a day. In fact, an airline analysis company predicts just 385 additional flights per day. This figure is nowhere near 700.






                share|improve this answer













                Heathrow Airport has a "dedicated website" for the planned creation of an additional runway. From the dedicated website (emphasis added):




                Heathrow Today



                • 98% capacity – Flight movements at Heathrow are capped at 480,000/year

                Heathrow Expansion:



                • 740,000 flight movements capacity



                Assuming the capacity in the expanded airport is still per year (as is explicitly stated on another Heathrow Airport website), there would be the capacity for an additional 260,000 flights per year. That is equivalent to ~712 flights per day offered by the additional capacity.



                OAG, "an air travel intelligence company," predicts a total of 140,556 air traffic movements (ATMs). Their report is pretty comprehensive and includes long-haul, short-haul, etc. A single departure (and arrival) counts as one ATM. Thus, the increase of 140,556 ATMs is equivalent to 385 additional flights per day. Equivalently, 54.1% of the additional capacity is expected to be used, and not 100%.



                To summarize:




                Would 700 more planes a day fly because of the Heathrow expansion, as the signs imply?




                Maybe. Probably not. The expansion will increase the airport capacity by 712 flights per day. This is not a guarantee that 712 extra flights will occur a day. In fact, an airline analysis company predicts just 385 additional flights per day. This figure is nowhere near 700.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 2 hours ago









                Barry HarrisonBarry Harrison

                3,59811355




                3,59811355





















                    2














                    Yes, assuming that the airport continues to run at 98% capacity or higher.



                    According to Heathrowexpansion.com (a site apparently also owned by the airport), the expansion would have a "740,000 flight movements capacity" (per year for three runways) while currently the capacity is 480,000/year. This makes the math to figure out the new cap (740,000-480,000)/365 which is about 712 flights per day more than the previous cap. If they run at 98% capacity that makes it 698 flights per day extra.






                    share|improve this answer


















                    • 2





                      But that's a big assumption to make when you've increased capacity by 50%.

                      – Bob
                      17 mins ago











                    • @Bob Is the other answer correct? "Probably not." In bold. That is a strong statement.

                      – J. D
                      4 mins ago















                    2














                    Yes, assuming that the airport continues to run at 98% capacity or higher.



                    According to Heathrowexpansion.com (a site apparently also owned by the airport), the expansion would have a "740,000 flight movements capacity" (per year for three runways) while currently the capacity is 480,000/year. This makes the math to figure out the new cap (740,000-480,000)/365 which is about 712 flights per day more than the previous cap. If they run at 98% capacity that makes it 698 flights per day extra.






                    share|improve this answer


















                    • 2





                      But that's a big assumption to make when you've increased capacity by 50%.

                      – Bob
                      17 mins ago











                    • @Bob Is the other answer correct? "Probably not." In bold. That is a strong statement.

                      – J. D
                      4 mins ago













                    2












                    2








                    2







                    Yes, assuming that the airport continues to run at 98% capacity or higher.



                    According to Heathrowexpansion.com (a site apparently also owned by the airport), the expansion would have a "740,000 flight movements capacity" (per year for three runways) while currently the capacity is 480,000/year. This makes the math to figure out the new cap (740,000-480,000)/365 which is about 712 flights per day more than the previous cap. If they run at 98% capacity that makes it 698 flights per day extra.






                    share|improve this answer













                    Yes, assuming that the airport continues to run at 98% capacity or higher.



                    According to Heathrowexpansion.com (a site apparently also owned by the airport), the expansion would have a "740,000 flight movements capacity" (per year for three runways) while currently the capacity is 480,000/year. This makes the math to figure out the new cap (740,000-480,000)/365 which is about 712 flights per day more than the previous cap. If they run at 98% capacity that makes it 698 flights per day extra.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered 2 hours ago









                    LaurelLaurel

                    12.7k65361




                    12.7k65361







                    • 2





                      But that's a big assumption to make when you've increased capacity by 50%.

                      – Bob
                      17 mins ago











                    • @Bob Is the other answer correct? "Probably not." In bold. That is a strong statement.

                      – J. D
                      4 mins ago












                    • 2





                      But that's a big assumption to make when you've increased capacity by 50%.

                      – Bob
                      17 mins ago











                    • @Bob Is the other answer correct? "Probably not." In bold. That is a strong statement.

                      – J. D
                      4 mins ago







                    2




                    2





                    But that's a big assumption to make when you've increased capacity by 50%.

                    – Bob
                    17 mins ago





                    But that's a big assumption to make when you've increased capacity by 50%.

                    – Bob
                    17 mins ago













                    @Bob Is the other answer correct? "Probably not." In bold. That is a strong statement.

                    – J. D
                    4 mins ago





                    @Bob Is the other answer correct? "Probably not." In bold. That is a strong statement.

                    – J. D
                    4 mins ago



                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                    Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                    Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її