The selling of the sheepThe story of green apples and red herringsWhat's your price for the eggs?3 Planks, 1 nailQueue in the bankThe Pie-Maker's SonA Fairytale Of The PastClever Jack - A logical fairy taleReading in the dark, faster than lightAbnormal Beyond StressedThe Boy of Fire: The Final Battle

Huffman Code in C++

What is the meaning of 「隣のおじいさんは言いました」

Python 3 - simple temperature program version 1.3

Why increasing of the temperature of the objects like wood, paper etc. doesn't fire them?

Has the United States ever had a non-Christian President?

How to replace space with '+' symbol in a triangular array?

Make me a minimum magic sum

Subnumcases as a part of align

Can anyone identify this unknown 1988 PC card from The Palantir Corporation?

Changing stroke width vertically but not horizontally in Inkscape

Can an earth elemental drag a tiny creature underground with Earth Glide?

What would happen if I combined this polymer and this metal (assuming I can)

Can an Iranian citizen enter the USA on a Dutch passport?

Why can't argument be forwarded inside lambda without mutable?

How to detect nM levels of Copper(I) Oxide in blood?

How did the Apollo guidance computer handle parity bit errors?

In "Avengers: Endgame", what does this name refer to?

Is throwing dice a stochastic or a deterministic process?

Guess the number game (Python)

How to use awk to extract data from a file based on the content of another file?

What happens if I accidentally leave an app running and click "Install Now" in Software Updater?

Where did Lovecraft write about Carcosa?

How do I, as a DM, handle a party that decides to set up an ambush in a dungeon?

How did the Force make Luke hard to hit in the Battle of Yavin?



The selling of the sheep


The story of green apples and red herringsWhat's your price for the eggs?3 Planks, 1 nailQueue in the bankThe Pie-Maker's SonA Fairytale Of The PastClever Jack - A logical fairy taleReading in the dark, faster than lightAbnormal Beyond StressedThe Boy of Fire: The Final Battle













3












$begingroup$


I do not know the answer to this puzzle, and I found it in some old files I had




Many years ago, there was a shepherd with 3 children. One day, while talking to the owner of the herd, the shepherd was praising how smart and creative his children were.
His boss decided to put that to a test and called the 3 boys to him. His words were the following:


"Here are 90 sheep. You should take them to the market next Saturday. Lewis, the oldest, will take 50 sheep; John will take 30; and Peter will take 10. The price by which Lewis negotiates his sheep should be the same for the rest of you, i.e. if Lewis decides to sell at 100€ per sheep, John and Peter should sell at the same price. You should sell all the sheep and you should earn equal amounts. I don't want any sheep back and I want to earn money from this."


The following Saturday, the brothers went to the market, sold all the sheep (Lewis sold 50, John sold 30 and Peter sold 10), the price was always the same, and each returned with equal sums of money. How?


Clarification: The price of each sheep and the amount earned by each brother should be higher than 0€. Also, selling between brothers is not considered valid.











share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Lewis gives Peter 20 sheep.
    $endgroup$
    – Dr Xorile
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DrXorile I forgot to add something to the story that I think that forbids that, sorry. Edited.
    $endgroup$
    – cinico
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Does "selling between brothers" imply that rot13(gurl pna'g tvir zbarl gb rnpu bgure)?
    $endgroup$
    – EKons
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @EKons The original puzzle does not say it explicitly, but it seems to me that is implicit that that's not allowed. But again, I do not know the solution. I will wait a few weeks for a neat and clean solution to be answered. If not, I will accept the most original/creative one.
    $endgroup$
    – cinico
    3 hours ago















3












$begingroup$


I do not know the answer to this puzzle, and I found it in some old files I had




Many years ago, there was a shepherd with 3 children. One day, while talking to the owner of the herd, the shepherd was praising how smart and creative his children were.
His boss decided to put that to a test and called the 3 boys to him. His words were the following:


"Here are 90 sheep. You should take them to the market next Saturday. Lewis, the oldest, will take 50 sheep; John will take 30; and Peter will take 10. The price by which Lewis negotiates his sheep should be the same for the rest of you, i.e. if Lewis decides to sell at 100€ per sheep, John and Peter should sell at the same price. You should sell all the sheep and you should earn equal amounts. I don't want any sheep back and I want to earn money from this."


The following Saturday, the brothers went to the market, sold all the sheep (Lewis sold 50, John sold 30 and Peter sold 10), the price was always the same, and each returned with equal sums of money. How?


Clarification: The price of each sheep and the amount earned by each brother should be higher than 0€. Also, selling between brothers is not considered valid.











share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Lewis gives Peter 20 sheep.
    $endgroup$
    – Dr Xorile
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DrXorile I forgot to add something to the story that I think that forbids that, sorry. Edited.
    $endgroup$
    – cinico
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Does "selling between brothers" imply that rot13(gurl pna'g tvir zbarl gb rnpu bgure)?
    $endgroup$
    – EKons
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @EKons The original puzzle does not say it explicitly, but it seems to me that is implicit that that's not allowed. But again, I do not know the solution. I will wait a few weeks for a neat and clean solution to be answered. If not, I will accept the most original/creative one.
    $endgroup$
    – cinico
    3 hours ago













3












3








3





$begingroup$


I do not know the answer to this puzzle, and I found it in some old files I had




Many years ago, there was a shepherd with 3 children. One day, while talking to the owner of the herd, the shepherd was praising how smart and creative his children were.
His boss decided to put that to a test and called the 3 boys to him. His words were the following:


"Here are 90 sheep. You should take them to the market next Saturday. Lewis, the oldest, will take 50 sheep; John will take 30; and Peter will take 10. The price by which Lewis negotiates his sheep should be the same for the rest of you, i.e. if Lewis decides to sell at 100€ per sheep, John and Peter should sell at the same price. You should sell all the sheep and you should earn equal amounts. I don't want any sheep back and I want to earn money from this."


The following Saturday, the brothers went to the market, sold all the sheep (Lewis sold 50, John sold 30 and Peter sold 10), the price was always the same, and each returned with equal sums of money. How?


Clarification: The price of each sheep and the amount earned by each brother should be higher than 0€. Also, selling between brothers is not considered valid.











share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I do not know the answer to this puzzle, and I found it in some old files I had




Many years ago, there was a shepherd with 3 children. One day, while talking to the owner of the herd, the shepherd was praising how smart and creative his children were.
His boss decided to put that to a test and called the 3 boys to him. His words were the following:


"Here are 90 sheep. You should take them to the market next Saturday. Lewis, the oldest, will take 50 sheep; John will take 30; and Peter will take 10. The price by which Lewis negotiates his sheep should be the same for the rest of you, i.e. if Lewis decides to sell at 100€ per sheep, John and Peter should sell at the same price. You should sell all the sheep and you should earn equal amounts. I don't want any sheep back and I want to earn money from this."


The following Saturday, the brothers went to the market, sold all the sheep (Lewis sold 50, John sold 30 and Peter sold 10), the price was always the same, and each returned with equal sums of money. How?


Clarification: The price of each sheep and the amount earned by each brother should be higher than 0€. Also, selling between brothers is not considered valid.








lateral-thinking story strategy






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago









Gareth McCaughan

70.1k3178272




70.1k3178272










asked 4 hours ago









cinicocinico

22116




22116







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Lewis gives Peter 20 sheep.
    $endgroup$
    – Dr Xorile
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DrXorile I forgot to add something to the story that I think that forbids that, sorry. Edited.
    $endgroup$
    – cinico
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Does "selling between brothers" imply that rot13(gurl pna'g tvir zbarl gb rnpu bgure)?
    $endgroup$
    – EKons
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @EKons The original puzzle does not say it explicitly, but it seems to me that is implicit that that's not allowed. But again, I do not know the solution. I will wait a few weeks for a neat and clean solution to be answered. If not, I will accept the most original/creative one.
    $endgroup$
    – cinico
    3 hours ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Lewis gives Peter 20 sheep.
    $endgroup$
    – Dr Xorile
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DrXorile I forgot to add something to the story that I think that forbids that, sorry. Edited.
    $endgroup$
    – cinico
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Does "selling between brothers" imply that rot13(gurl pna'g tvir zbarl gb rnpu bgure)?
    $endgroup$
    – EKons
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @EKons The original puzzle does not say it explicitly, but it seems to me that is implicit that that's not allowed. But again, I do not know the solution. I will wait a few weeks for a neat and clean solution to be answered. If not, I will accept the most original/creative one.
    $endgroup$
    – cinico
    3 hours ago







1




1




$begingroup$
Lewis gives Peter 20 sheep.
$endgroup$
– Dr Xorile
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
Lewis gives Peter 20 sheep.
$endgroup$
– Dr Xorile
4 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@DrXorile I forgot to add something to the story that I think that forbids that, sorry. Edited.
$endgroup$
– cinico
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
@DrXorile I forgot to add something to the story that I think that forbids that, sorry. Edited.
$endgroup$
– cinico
3 hours ago












$begingroup$
Does "selling between brothers" imply that rot13(gurl pna'g tvir zbarl gb rnpu bgure)?
$endgroup$
– EKons
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
Does "selling between brothers" imply that rot13(gurl pna'g tvir zbarl gb rnpu bgure)?
$endgroup$
– EKons
3 hours ago












$begingroup$
@EKons The original puzzle does not say it explicitly, but it seems to me that is implicit that that's not allowed. But again, I do not know the solution. I will wait a few weeks for a neat and clean solution to be answered. If not, I will accept the most original/creative one.
$endgroup$
– cinico
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
@EKons The original puzzle does not say it explicitly, but it seems to me that is implicit that that's not allowed. But again, I do not know the solution. I will wait a few weeks for a neat and clean solution to be answered. If not, I will accept the most original/creative one.
$endgroup$
– cinico
3 hours ago










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$


The oldest brother paid expenses for the youngest and himself. The middle one covered only his own.


5000-4000=3000-2000=1000-0







share|improve this answer










New contributor




Carl Dombrowski is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Very nice answer! I don't know if this is what the OP wants, but it certainly works.
    $endgroup$
    – Brandon_J
    2 hours ago


















3












$begingroup$

and each returned with equal sums of money. How?




When they went to the market (and sold all the sheep for 100), Lewis went with nothing, John with 2000 and Peter with 4000 in spare change. So they all returned with equal sums of money!







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    1












    $begingroup$

    My answer:




    When negotiating, Lewis just needs to specify that the price is divided by "the number of sheep I have". So, for example, if he negotiates the price of each sheep to "500€ divided by the number of sheep I have", then: Lewis makes 500€/50 * 50 sheep = 500€, John makes 500€/30 * 30 sheep = 500€, and Peter makes 500€/10 * 10 sheep = 500€







    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      0












      $begingroup$

      Assuming that the brothers are benevolent to each other:




      The question states they "returned with equal sums of money". It does not necessarily say that is was their own money. Perhaps Lewis' money is too heavy for him to carry himself. In that case, Peter could have offered to carry some of his brother's money, and promised to give it back after they had returned.







      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$




















        0












        $begingroup$

        Similar to @JonMarkPerry's answer, but working from the other direction:




        After they made their profit (say 100 per sheep), Lewis spent 4000 at the market on some unrelated items, and John spent 2000. They all returned home with only 1000 in their pocket.







        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$




















          0












          $begingroup$


          They set the price of the sheep at $600€$ per $12$ sheep and $300€$ per individual sheep.



          Lewis sells $4 * 12$ sheep $= 48$ sheep at $4 * 600€ = 2400€.$ Lewis then sells his remaining $2$ sheep at $2 * 300€ = 600€.$ His total is $2400€ + 600€ = 3000€.$



          John sells $2 * 12$ sheep $= 24$ sheep at $2 * 600€ = 1200€.$ John then sells his remaining $6$ sheep at $6 * 300€ = 1800€.$ His total is $1200€ + 1800€ = 3000€.$



          Peter sells his $10$ sheep at $10 * 300€ = 3000€$.






          share








          New contributor




          Kevin Fegan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "559"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f83653%2fthe-selling-of-the-sheep%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            6 Answers
            6






            active

            oldest

            votes








            6 Answers
            6






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4












            $begingroup$


            The oldest brother paid expenses for the youngest and himself. The middle one covered only his own.


            5000-4000=3000-2000=1000-0







            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Carl Dombrowski is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            $endgroup$








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Very nice answer! I don't know if this is what the OP wants, but it certainly works.
              $endgroup$
              – Brandon_J
              2 hours ago















            4












            $begingroup$


            The oldest brother paid expenses for the youngest and himself. The middle one covered only his own.


            5000-4000=3000-2000=1000-0







            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Carl Dombrowski is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            $endgroup$








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Very nice answer! I don't know if this is what the OP wants, but it certainly works.
              $endgroup$
              – Brandon_J
              2 hours ago













            4












            4








            4





            $begingroup$


            The oldest brother paid expenses for the youngest and himself. The middle one covered only his own.


            5000-4000=3000-2000=1000-0







            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Carl Dombrowski is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            $endgroup$




            The oldest brother paid expenses for the youngest and himself. The middle one covered only his own.


            5000-4000=3000-2000=1000-0








            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Carl Dombrowski is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 2 hours ago









            Brandon_J

            4,287449




            4,287449






            New contributor




            Carl Dombrowski is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            answered 3 hours ago









            Carl DombrowskiCarl Dombrowski

            1414




            1414




            New contributor




            Carl Dombrowski is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





            New contributor





            Carl Dombrowski is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            Carl Dombrowski is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Very nice answer! I don't know if this is what the OP wants, but it certainly works.
              $endgroup$
              – Brandon_J
              2 hours ago












            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Very nice answer! I don't know if this is what the OP wants, but it certainly works.
              $endgroup$
              – Brandon_J
              2 hours ago







            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            Very nice answer! I don't know if this is what the OP wants, but it certainly works.
            $endgroup$
            – Brandon_J
            2 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            Very nice answer! I don't know if this is what the OP wants, but it certainly works.
            $endgroup$
            – Brandon_J
            2 hours ago











            3












            $begingroup$

            and each returned with equal sums of money. How?




            When they went to the market (and sold all the sheep for 100), Lewis went with nothing, John with 2000 and Peter with 4000 in spare change. So they all returned with equal sums of money!







            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              3












              $begingroup$

              and each returned with equal sums of money. How?




              When they went to the market (and sold all the sheep for 100), Lewis went with nothing, John with 2000 and Peter with 4000 in spare change. So they all returned with equal sums of money!







              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                3












                3








                3





                $begingroup$

                and each returned with equal sums of money. How?




                When they went to the market (and sold all the sheep for 100), Lewis went with nothing, John with 2000 and Peter with 4000 in spare change. So they all returned with equal sums of money!







                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                and each returned with equal sums of money. How?




                When they went to the market (and sold all the sheep for 100), Lewis went with nothing, John with 2000 and Peter with 4000 in spare change. So they all returned with equal sums of money!








                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 2 hours ago









                JonMark PerryJonMark Perry

                21.4k641101




                21.4k641101





















                    1












                    $begingroup$

                    My answer:




                    When negotiating, Lewis just needs to specify that the price is divided by "the number of sheep I have". So, for example, if he negotiates the price of each sheep to "500€ divided by the number of sheep I have", then: Lewis makes 500€/50 * 50 sheep = 500€, John makes 500€/30 * 30 sheep = 500€, and Peter makes 500€/10 * 10 sheep = 500€







                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$

















                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      My answer:




                      When negotiating, Lewis just needs to specify that the price is divided by "the number of sheep I have". So, for example, if he negotiates the price of each sheep to "500€ divided by the number of sheep I have", then: Lewis makes 500€/50 * 50 sheep = 500€, John makes 500€/30 * 30 sheep = 500€, and Peter makes 500€/10 * 10 sheep = 500€







                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$















                        1












                        1








                        1





                        $begingroup$

                        My answer:




                        When negotiating, Lewis just needs to specify that the price is divided by "the number of sheep I have". So, for example, if he negotiates the price of each sheep to "500€ divided by the number of sheep I have", then: Lewis makes 500€/50 * 50 sheep = 500€, John makes 500€/30 * 30 sheep = 500€, and Peter makes 500€/10 * 10 sheep = 500€







                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$



                        My answer:




                        When negotiating, Lewis just needs to specify that the price is divided by "the number of sheep I have". So, for example, if he negotiates the price of each sheep to "500€ divided by the number of sheep I have", then: Lewis makes 500€/50 * 50 sheep = 500€, John makes 500€/30 * 30 sheep = 500€, and Peter makes 500€/10 * 10 sheep = 500€








                        share|improve this answer












                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer










                        answered 2 hours ago









                        windbladewindblade

                        1237




                        1237





















                            0












                            $begingroup$

                            Assuming that the brothers are benevolent to each other:




                            The question states they "returned with equal sums of money". It does not necessarily say that is was their own money. Perhaps Lewis' money is too heavy for him to carry himself. In that case, Peter could have offered to carry some of his brother's money, and promised to give it back after they had returned.







                            share|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$

















                              0












                              $begingroup$

                              Assuming that the brothers are benevolent to each other:




                              The question states they "returned with equal sums of money". It does not necessarily say that is was their own money. Perhaps Lewis' money is too heavy for him to carry himself. In that case, Peter could have offered to carry some of his brother's money, and promised to give it back after they had returned.







                              share|improve this answer









                              $endgroup$















                                0












                                0








                                0





                                $begingroup$

                                Assuming that the brothers are benevolent to each other:




                                The question states they "returned with equal sums of money". It does not necessarily say that is was their own money. Perhaps Lewis' money is too heavy for him to carry himself. In that case, Peter could have offered to carry some of his brother's money, and promised to give it back after they had returned.







                                share|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$



                                Assuming that the brothers are benevolent to each other:




                                The question states they "returned with equal sums of money". It does not necessarily say that is was their own money. Perhaps Lewis' money is too heavy for him to carry himself. In that case, Peter could have offered to carry some of his brother's money, and promised to give it back after they had returned.








                                share|improve this answer












                                share|improve this answer



                                share|improve this answer










                                answered 1 hour ago









                                Dr SheldonDr Sheldon

                                1605




                                1605





















                                    0












                                    $begingroup$

                                    Similar to @JonMarkPerry's answer, but working from the other direction:




                                    After they made their profit (say 100 per sheep), Lewis spent 4000 at the market on some unrelated items, and John spent 2000. They all returned home with only 1000 in their pocket.







                                    share|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$

















                                      0












                                      $begingroup$

                                      Similar to @JonMarkPerry's answer, but working from the other direction:




                                      After they made their profit (say 100 per sheep), Lewis spent 4000 at the market on some unrelated items, and John spent 2000. They all returned home with only 1000 in their pocket.







                                      share|improve this answer









                                      $endgroup$















                                        0












                                        0








                                        0





                                        $begingroup$

                                        Similar to @JonMarkPerry's answer, but working from the other direction:




                                        After they made their profit (say 100 per sheep), Lewis spent 4000 at the market on some unrelated items, and John spent 2000. They all returned home with only 1000 in their pocket.







                                        share|improve this answer









                                        $endgroup$



                                        Similar to @JonMarkPerry's answer, but working from the other direction:




                                        After they made their profit (say 100 per sheep), Lewis spent 4000 at the market on some unrelated items, and John spent 2000. They all returned home with only 1000 in their pocket.








                                        share|improve this answer












                                        share|improve this answer



                                        share|improve this answer










                                        answered 55 mins ago









                                        Dr SheldonDr Sheldon

                                        1605




                                        1605





















                                            0












                                            $begingroup$


                                            They set the price of the sheep at $600€$ per $12$ sheep and $300€$ per individual sheep.



                                            Lewis sells $4 * 12$ sheep $= 48$ sheep at $4 * 600€ = 2400€.$ Lewis then sells his remaining $2$ sheep at $2 * 300€ = 600€.$ His total is $2400€ + 600€ = 3000€.$



                                            John sells $2 * 12$ sheep $= 24$ sheep at $2 * 600€ = 1200€.$ John then sells his remaining $6$ sheep at $6 * 300€ = 1800€.$ His total is $1200€ + 1800€ = 3000€.$



                                            Peter sells his $10$ sheep at $10 * 300€ = 3000€$.






                                            share








                                            New contributor




                                            Kevin Fegan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                            Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                            $endgroup$

















                                              0












                                              $begingroup$


                                              They set the price of the sheep at $600€$ per $12$ sheep and $300€$ per individual sheep.



                                              Lewis sells $4 * 12$ sheep $= 48$ sheep at $4 * 600€ = 2400€.$ Lewis then sells his remaining $2$ sheep at $2 * 300€ = 600€.$ His total is $2400€ + 600€ = 3000€.$



                                              John sells $2 * 12$ sheep $= 24$ sheep at $2 * 600€ = 1200€.$ John then sells his remaining $6$ sheep at $6 * 300€ = 1800€.$ His total is $1200€ + 1800€ = 3000€.$



                                              Peter sells his $10$ sheep at $10 * 300€ = 3000€$.






                                              share








                                              New contributor




                                              Kevin Fegan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                              Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                              $endgroup$















                                                0












                                                0








                                                0





                                                $begingroup$


                                                They set the price of the sheep at $600€$ per $12$ sheep and $300€$ per individual sheep.



                                                Lewis sells $4 * 12$ sheep $= 48$ sheep at $4 * 600€ = 2400€.$ Lewis then sells his remaining $2$ sheep at $2 * 300€ = 600€.$ His total is $2400€ + 600€ = 3000€.$



                                                John sells $2 * 12$ sheep $= 24$ sheep at $2 * 600€ = 1200€.$ John then sells his remaining $6$ sheep at $6 * 300€ = 1800€.$ His total is $1200€ + 1800€ = 3000€.$



                                                Peter sells his $10$ sheep at $10 * 300€ = 3000€$.






                                                share








                                                New contributor




                                                Kevin Fegan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                                $endgroup$




                                                They set the price of the sheep at $600€$ per $12$ sheep and $300€$ per individual sheep.



                                                Lewis sells $4 * 12$ sheep $= 48$ sheep at $4 * 600€ = 2400€.$ Lewis then sells his remaining $2$ sheep at $2 * 300€ = 600€.$ His total is $2400€ + 600€ = 3000€.$



                                                John sells $2 * 12$ sheep $= 24$ sheep at $2 * 600€ = 1200€.$ John then sells his remaining $6$ sheep at $6 * 300€ = 1800€.$ His total is $1200€ + 1800€ = 3000€.$



                                                Peter sells his $10$ sheep at $10 * 300€ = 3000€$.







                                                share








                                                New contributor




                                                Kevin Fegan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                Check out our Code of Conduct.








                                                share


                                                share






                                                New contributor




                                                Kevin Fegan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                                answered 5 mins ago









                                                Kevin FeganKevin Fegan

                                                1033




                                                1033




                                                New contributor




                                                Kevin Fegan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                                New contributor





                                                Kevin Fegan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                                Kevin Fegan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                Check out our Code of Conduct.



























                                                    draft saved

                                                    draft discarded
















































                                                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


                                                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                    But avoid


                                                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                                    draft saved


                                                    draft discarded














                                                    StackExchange.ready(
                                                    function ()
                                                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f83653%2fthe-selling-of-the-sheep%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                                    );

                                                    Post as a guest















                                                    Required, but never shown





















































                                                    Required, but never shown














                                                    Required, but never shown












                                                    Required, but never shown







                                                    Required, but never shown

































                                                    Required, but never shown














                                                    Required, but never shown












                                                    Required, but never shown







                                                    Required, but never shown







                                                    Popular posts from this blog

                                                    Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                                                    Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                                                    François Viète Contents Biography Work and thought Bibliography See also Notes Further reading External links Navigation menup. 21Google Bookspp. 75–77Google BooksDe thou (from University of Saint Andrews)ArchivedGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle booksGoogle Bookscc-parthenay.frL'histoire universelle (fr)Universal History (en)ArchivedAdsabs.harvard.eduPagesperso-orange.frArchive.orgChikara Sasaki. Descartes' mathematical thought p.259Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle Bookspp. 152 and onwardGoogle BooksGoogle BooksScribd.comGoogle Books1257-7979Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGallica.bnf.frGoogle BooksGoogle Books"François Viète"Francois Viète: Father of Modern Algebraic NotationThe Lawyer and the GamblerAbout TarporleySite de Jean-Paul GuichardL'algèbre nouvelle"About the Harmonicon"cb120511976(data)1188044800000 0001 0913 5903n82164680ola2013766880073431702w6vt1sb70287374827140948071409480