Many one decreasing function?many to one functionsDemonstrating that a function is monotonically increasing/decreasingHow to determine if this function is one-to-oneHow many times does the function $y=x+sin^2left(frac x3right)-3$ cross the x-axis?Having trouble finding the domain of this function?How to determine the new domain and range given the old domain and range?I got a question on whether the function is one-one or many-one and onto or into .Problem in finding whether function is one-one or many-oneShow that $left(dfrac1(xln x(ln(ln x))^2/3right)$ is decreasing for all $x > 3$principal root confusion
What does the copyright in a dissertation protect exactly?
What calendar would the Saturn nation use?
If an attacker targets a creature with the Sanctuary spell cast on them, but fails the Wisdom save, can they choose not to attack anyone else?
Learning how to read schematics, questions about fractional voltage in schematic
Convert Numbers To Emoji Math
What does “two-bit (jerk)” mean?
In a series of books, what happens after the coming of age?
Splitting polygons and dividing attribute value proportionally using ArcGIS Pro?
How does "politician" work as a job/career?
How to increase speed on my hybrid bike with flat handlebars and 700X35C tyres?
How to increase row height of a table and vertically "align middle"?
How do I minimise waste on a flight?
Drug Testing and Prescribed Medications
What's the difference between "ricochet" and "bounce"?
Convert a huge txt-file into a dataset
Why did Dr. Strange keep looking into the future after the snap?
Why is there a cap on 401k contributions?
What did Varys actually mean?
Concatenate all values of the same XML element using XPath/XQuery
Does restarting the SQL Services (on the machine) clear the server cache (for things like query plans and statistics)?
why it is 2>&1 and not 2>>&1 to append to a log file
How is it believable that Euron could so easily pull off this ambush?
Searching for a sentence that I only know part of it using Google's operators
Select list elements based on other list
Many one decreasing function?
many to one functionsDemonstrating that a function is monotonically increasing/decreasingHow to determine if this function is one-to-oneHow many times does the function $y=x+sin^2left(frac x3right)-3$ cross the x-axis?Having trouble finding the domain of this function?How to determine the new domain and range given the old domain and range?I got a question on whether the function is one-one or many-one and onto or into .Problem in finding whether function is one-one or many-oneShow that $left(dfrac1(xln x(ln(ln x))^2/3right)$ is decreasing for all $x > 3$principal root confusion
$begingroup$
The function $f(x) = frac1x-1 + frac2x-2 + frac3x-3$ is many-to-one, despite it having a strictly negative derivative (the domain being $mathbbR - 1,2,3$). Why is this so? Is there any way of knowing this without actually graphing $f(x)$, which seems rather difficult?
functions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The function $f(x) = frac1x-1 + frac2x-2 + frac3x-3$ is many-to-one, despite it having a strictly negative derivative (the domain being $mathbbR - 1,2,3$). Why is this so? Is there any way of knowing this without actually graphing $f(x)$, which seems rather difficult?
functions
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Umm... "my book"?
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@DavidG.Stork Resonance rank booster, it is a preparatory book for joint entrance advanced examination in India, I didn't think it would be well known so I didn't mention it.
$endgroup$
– Hema
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
You DID mention it... that's the problem!
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
59 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The function $f(x) = frac1x-1 + frac2x-2 + frac3x-3$ is many-to-one, despite it having a strictly negative derivative (the domain being $mathbbR - 1,2,3$). Why is this so? Is there any way of knowing this without actually graphing $f(x)$, which seems rather difficult?
functions
$endgroup$
The function $f(x) = frac1x-1 + frac2x-2 + frac3x-3$ is many-to-one, despite it having a strictly negative derivative (the domain being $mathbbR - 1,2,3$). Why is this so? Is there any way of knowing this without actually graphing $f(x)$, which seems rather difficult?
functions
functions
edited 55 mins ago
David G. Stork
12.4k41836
12.4k41836
asked 2 hours ago
HemaHema
6601313
6601313
1
$begingroup$
Umm... "my book"?
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@DavidG.Stork Resonance rank booster, it is a preparatory book for joint entrance advanced examination in India, I didn't think it would be well known so I didn't mention it.
$endgroup$
– Hema
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
You DID mention it... that's the problem!
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
59 mins ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Umm... "my book"?
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@DavidG.Stork Resonance rank booster, it is a preparatory book for joint entrance advanced examination in India, I didn't think it would be well known so I didn't mention it.
$endgroup$
– Hema
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
You DID mention it... that's the problem!
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
59 mins ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Umm... "my book"?
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Umm... "my book"?
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@DavidG.Stork Resonance rank booster, it is a preparatory book for joint entrance advanced examination in India, I didn't think it would be well known so I didn't mention it.
$endgroup$
– Hema
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@DavidG.Stork Resonance rank booster, it is a preparatory book for joint entrance advanced examination in India, I didn't think it would be well known so I didn't mention it.
$endgroup$
– Hema
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
You DID mention it... that's the problem!
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
59 mins ago
$begingroup$
You DID mention it... that's the problem!
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
59 mins ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
When we approach $x=1$ very close from the negative direction, $x-1$ will be a very small negative value and so $frac1x-1$ will be a very large negative value. Approaching from the other side we have $frac1x-1$ becoming a very positive value. In fact, it can become as large or as small as you like, provided you get as close to $x=1$ as necessary.
By looking at the other terms, we see that the same thing happens at $x=2$ and $x=3$ and we see that, near each of these points, the function can attain any value we like. Therefore, there exist distinct $x$ values for which $f(x)$ is the same, and so the function is not one-to-one.
$$rule4cm0.4pt$$
By the way, the reason we can have a function with a strictly negative derivative that isn’t one-to-one is because it isn’t continuous. Specifically, this function isn’t continuous at the points $x=1, x=2, x=3$. Even if we remove these points from the domain as we have, we still find that our function can attain a particular value more than once without the derivative ever becoming zero or switching sign. This is because, at a certain point, the function ‘blows up’ to negative infinity and then magically returns again from positive infinity, so on the domain we have defined, the derivative is always negative.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's because it goes from plus infinity to minus infinity on both $(1,2)$ and $(2,3)$ (so by Intermediate value theorem it assumes every real value at least twice) which you can see by computing the appropriate limits.
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Note that the function is continuous on the domain given and so the IVT applies.
$endgroup$
– 雨が好きな人
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3216622%2fmany-one-decreasing-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
When we approach $x=1$ very close from the negative direction, $x-1$ will be a very small negative value and so $frac1x-1$ will be a very large negative value. Approaching from the other side we have $frac1x-1$ becoming a very positive value. In fact, it can become as large or as small as you like, provided you get as close to $x=1$ as necessary.
By looking at the other terms, we see that the same thing happens at $x=2$ and $x=3$ and we see that, near each of these points, the function can attain any value we like. Therefore, there exist distinct $x$ values for which $f(x)$ is the same, and so the function is not one-to-one.
$$rule4cm0.4pt$$
By the way, the reason we can have a function with a strictly negative derivative that isn’t one-to-one is because it isn’t continuous. Specifically, this function isn’t continuous at the points $x=1, x=2, x=3$. Even if we remove these points from the domain as we have, we still find that our function can attain a particular value more than once without the derivative ever becoming zero or switching sign. This is because, at a certain point, the function ‘blows up’ to negative infinity and then magically returns again from positive infinity, so on the domain we have defined, the derivative is always negative.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When we approach $x=1$ very close from the negative direction, $x-1$ will be a very small negative value and so $frac1x-1$ will be a very large negative value. Approaching from the other side we have $frac1x-1$ becoming a very positive value. In fact, it can become as large or as small as you like, provided you get as close to $x=1$ as necessary.
By looking at the other terms, we see that the same thing happens at $x=2$ and $x=3$ and we see that, near each of these points, the function can attain any value we like. Therefore, there exist distinct $x$ values for which $f(x)$ is the same, and so the function is not one-to-one.
$$rule4cm0.4pt$$
By the way, the reason we can have a function with a strictly negative derivative that isn’t one-to-one is because it isn’t continuous. Specifically, this function isn’t continuous at the points $x=1, x=2, x=3$. Even if we remove these points from the domain as we have, we still find that our function can attain a particular value more than once without the derivative ever becoming zero or switching sign. This is because, at a certain point, the function ‘blows up’ to negative infinity and then magically returns again from positive infinity, so on the domain we have defined, the derivative is always negative.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When we approach $x=1$ very close from the negative direction, $x-1$ will be a very small negative value and so $frac1x-1$ will be a very large negative value. Approaching from the other side we have $frac1x-1$ becoming a very positive value. In fact, it can become as large or as small as you like, provided you get as close to $x=1$ as necessary.
By looking at the other terms, we see that the same thing happens at $x=2$ and $x=3$ and we see that, near each of these points, the function can attain any value we like. Therefore, there exist distinct $x$ values for which $f(x)$ is the same, and so the function is not one-to-one.
$$rule4cm0.4pt$$
By the way, the reason we can have a function with a strictly negative derivative that isn’t one-to-one is because it isn’t continuous. Specifically, this function isn’t continuous at the points $x=1, x=2, x=3$. Even if we remove these points from the domain as we have, we still find that our function can attain a particular value more than once without the derivative ever becoming zero or switching sign. This is because, at a certain point, the function ‘blows up’ to negative infinity and then magically returns again from positive infinity, so on the domain we have defined, the derivative is always negative.
$endgroup$
When we approach $x=1$ very close from the negative direction, $x-1$ will be a very small negative value and so $frac1x-1$ will be a very large negative value. Approaching from the other side we have $frac1x-1$ becoming a very positive value. In fact, it can become as large or as small as you like, provided you get as close to $x=1$ as necessary.
By looking at the other terms, we see that the same thing happens at $x=2$ and $x=3$ and we see that, near each of these points, the function can attain any value we like. Therefore, there exist distinct $x$ values for which $f(x)$ is the same, and so the function is not one-to-one.
$$rule4cm0.4pt$$
By the way, the reason we can have a function with a strictly negative derivative that isn’t one-to-one is because it isn’t continuous. Specifically, this function isn’t continuous at the points $x=1, x=2, x=3$. Even if we remove these points from the domain as we have, we still find that our function can attain a particular value more than once without the derivative ever becoming zero or switching sign. This is because, at a certain point, the function ‘blows up’ to negative infinity and then magically returns again from positive infinity, so on the domain we have defined, the derivative is always negative.
edited 2 hours ago
answered 2 hours ago
雨が好きな人雨が好きな人
1,426316
1,426316
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's because it goes from plus infinity to minus infinity on both $(1,2)$ and $(2,3)$ (so by Intermediate value theorem it assumes every real value at least twice) which you can see by computing the appropriate limits.
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Note that the function is continuous on the domain given and so the IVT applies.
$endgroup$
– 雨が好きな人
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's because it goes from plus infinity to minus infinity on both $(1,2)$ and $(2,3)$ (so by Intermediate value theorem it assumes every real value at least twice) which you can see by computing the appropriate limits.
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Note that the function is continuous on the domain given and so the IVT applies.
$endgroup$
– 雨が好きな人
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's because it goes from plus infinity to minus infinity on both $(1,2)$ and $(2,3)$ (so by Intermediate value theorem it assumes every real value at least twice) which you can see by computing the appropriate limits.
New contributor
$endgroup$
It's because it goes from plus infinity to minus infinity on both $(1,2)$ and $(2,3)$ (so by Intermediate value theorem it assumes every real value at least twice) which you can see by computing the appropriate limits.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 2 hours ago
BartekBartek
112
112
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
Note that the function is continuous on the domain given and so the IVT applies.
$endgroup$
– 雨が好きな人
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Note that the function is continuous on the domain given and so the IVT applies.
$endgroup$
– 雨が好きな人
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Note that the function is continuous on the domain given and so the IVT applies.
$endgroup$
– 雨が好きな人
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Note that the function is continuous on the domain given and so the IVT applies.
$endgroup$
– 雨が好きな人
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3216622%2fmany-one-decreasing-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Umm... "my book"?
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@DavidG.Stork Resonance rank booster, it is a preparatory book for joint entrance advanced examination in India, I didn't think it would be well known so I didn't mention it.
$endgroup$
– Hema
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
You DID mention it... that's the problem!
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
59 mins ago