Why didn't Khan get resurrected in the Genesis Explosion? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWhy did Khan keep Ceti eels?Why does Carol Marcus not recognize Khan in The Wrath of Khan?Why did Khan decide to chase the Enterprise into the Mutara Nebula in Star Trek II?What is the light source in the Genesis cave?Who did Khan get his Starfleet insignia from?Were the Project Genesis Summary animations computer generated?What does this blurry technobabble on the Project Genesis Summary splash screen say?In Star Trek 2 (movie) The Wrath Of Khan, why does Khan wear the federation emblem?Why didn't Khan beam Kirk up from the planet when he beamed up the Genesis Device?Why does Khan have two copies of “Paradise Lost”?

What can we do to stop prior company from asking us questions?

How do I solve this limit?

Term for the "extreme-extension" version of a straw man fallacy?

Opposite of a diet

What is meant by a M next to a roman numeral?

How do we know the LHC results are robust?

Whats the best way to handle refactoring a big file?

Example of a Mathematician/Physicist whose Other Publications during their PhD eclipsed their PhD Thesis

Describing a person. What needs to be mentioned?

Why didn't Theresa May consult with Parliament before negotiating a deal with the EU?

How should I support this large drywall patch?

Would this house-rule that treats advantage as a +1 to the roll instead (and disadvantage as -1) and allows them to stack be balanced?

Can a caster that cast Polymorph on themselves stop concentrating at any point even if their Int is low?

How to make a software documentation "officially" citable?

How do scammers retract money, while you can’t?

Why were Madagascar and New Zealand discovered so late?

How do I go from 300 unfinished/half written blog posts, to published posts?

Is the concept of a "numerable" fiber bundle really useful or an empty generalization?

How to safely derail a train during transit?

Why doesn't a table tennis ball float on the surface? How do we calculate buoyancy here?

What happens if you roll doubles 3 times then land on "Go to jail?"

Go Pregnant or Go Home

What is the point of a new vote on May's deal when the indicative votes suggest she will not win?

What do "high sea" and "carry" mean in this sentence?



Why didn't Khan get resurrected in the Genesis Explosion?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWhy did Khan keep Ceti eels?Why does Carol Marcus not recognize Khan in The Wrath of Khan?Why did Khan decide to chase the Enterprise into the Mutara Nebula in Star Trek II?What is the light source in the Genesis cave?Who did Khan get his Starfleet insignia from?Were the Project Genesis Summary animations computer generated?What does this blurry technobabble on the Project Genesis Summary splash screen say?In Star Trek 2 (movie) The Wrath Of Khan, why does Khan wear the federation emblem?Why didn't Khan beam Kirk up from the planet when he beamed up the Genesis Device?Why does Khan have two copies of “Paradise Lost”?










7















In the end of (1980s) Star Trek II: Wrath of Khan, as the Enterprise escapes the nebula, leaving the dying Reliant behind, we see Khan engaging the memory banks of the Genesis device.



Later we see Spock's coffin torpedo ends up on the newly formed Genesis planet and as part of the result of the Genesis effect, clearly gets resurrected.



Wouldn't Khan have been resurrected too? Although, yes, Reliant was destroyed by the Genesis wave explosion, shouldn't he (and his crew??) have been resurrected as a by-product of the Genesis effect as well?










share|improve this question



















  • 5





    Khan's body would have been obliterated, blasted into billions of tiny little pieces, and altogether vaporized in the explosion, as opposed to Spock, whose carcass was torpedoed to the burgeoning Genesis planet? Remember, the wave destroys life, "in favour of its new matrix.". Khan and his crew were caught up in the destructive, life-killing part of the wave.. Spock's body was part of the 'new matrix"

    – NKCampbell
    10 hours ago







  • 1





    Maybe he did, in the centre of the planet. Being confined, for his pride and rebellion, in something geometrically resembling the Ninth Circle of Hell seems appropriate for someone who quotes Milton.

    – Gaultheria
    7 hours ago















7















In the end of (1980s) Star Trek II: Wrath of Khan, as the Enterprise escapes the nebula, leaving the dying Reliant behind, we see Khan engaging the memory banks of the Genesis device.



Later we see Spock's coffin torpedo ends up on the newly formed Genesis planet and as part of the result of the Genesis effect, clearly gets resurrected.



Wouldn't Khan have been resurrected too? Although, yes, Reliant was destroyed by the Genesis wave explosion, shouldn't he (and his crew??) have been resurrected as a by-product of the Genesis effect as well?










share|improve this question



















  • 5





    Khan's body would have been obliterated, blasted into billions of tiny little pieces, and altogether vaporized in the explosion, as opposed to Spock, whose carcass was torpedoed to the burgeoning Genesis planet? Remember, the wave destroys life, "in favour of its new matrix.". Khan and his crew were caught up in the destructive, life-killing part of the wave.. Spock's body was part of the 'new matrix"

    – NKCampbell
    10 hours ago







  • 1





    Maybe he did, in the centre of the planet. Being confined, for his pride and rebellion, in something geometrically resembling the Ninth Circle of Hell seems appropriate for someone who quotes Milton.

    – Gaultheria
    7 hours ago













7












7








7








In the end of (1980s) Star Trek II: Wrath of Khan, as the Enterprise escapes the nebula, leaving the dying Reliant behind, we see Khan engaging the memory banks of the Genesis device.



Later we see Spock's coffin torpedo ends up on the newly formed Genesis planet and as part of the result of the Genesis effect, clearly gets resurrected.



Wouldn't Khan have been resurrected too? Although, yes, Reliant was destroyed by the Genesis wave explosion, shouldn't he (and his crew??) have been resurrected as a by-product of the Genesis effect as well?










share|improve this question
















In the end of (1980s) Star Trek II: Wrath of Khan, as the Enterprise escapes the nebula, leaving the dying Reliant behind, we see Khan engaging the memory banks of the Genesis device.



Later we see Spock's coffin torpedo ends up on the newly formed Genesis planet and as part of the result of the Genesis effect, clearly gets resurrected.



Wouldn't Khan have been resurrected too? Although, yes, Reliant was destroyed by the Genesis wave explosion, shouldn't he (and his crew??) have been resurrected as a by-product of the Genesis effect as well?







star-trek the-wrath-of-khan






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 10 hours ago









Null

54.4k18229312




54.4k18229312










asked 10 hours ago









MissouriSpartanMissouriSpartan

48111




48111







  • 5





    Khan's body would have been obliterated, blasted into billions of tiny little pieces, and altogether vaporized in the explosion, as opposed to Spock, whose carcass was torpedoed to the burgeoning Genesis planet? Remember, the wave destroys life, "in favour of its new matrix.". Khan and his crew were caught up in the destructive, life-killing part of the wave.. Spock's body was part of the 'new matrix"

    – NKCampbell
    10 hours ago







  • 1





    Maybe he did, in the centre of the planet. Being confined, for his pride and rebellion, in something geometrically resembling the Ninth Circle of Hell seems appropriate for someone who quotes Milton.

    – Gaultheria
    7 hours ago












  • 5





    Khan's body would have been obliterated, blasted into billions of tiny little pieces, and altogether vaporized in the explosion, as opposed to Spock, whose carcass was torpedoed to the burgeoning Genesis planet? Remember, the wave destroys life, "in favour of its new matrix.". Khan and his crew were caught up in the destructive, life-killing part of the wave.. Spock's body was part of the 'new matrix"

    – NKCampbell
    10 hours ago







  • 1





    Maybe he did, in the centre of the planet. Being confined, for his pride and rebellion, in something geometrically resembling the Ninth Circle of Hell seems appropriate for someone who quotes Milton.

    – Gaultheria
    7 hours ago







5




5





Khan's body would have been obliterated, blasted into billions of tiny little pieces, and altogether vaporized in the explosion, as opposed to Spock, whose carcass was torpedoed to the burgeoning Genesis planet? Remember, the wave destroys life, "in favour of its new matrix.". Khan and his crew were caught up in the destructive, life-killing part of the wave.. Spock's body was part of the 'new matrix"

– NKCampbell
10 hours ago






Khan's body would have been obliterated, blasted into billions of tiny little pieces, and altogether vaporized in the explosion, as opposed to Spock, whose carcass was torpedoed to the burgeoning Genesis planet? Remember, the wave destroys life, "in favour of its new matrix.". Khan and his crew were caught up in the destructive, life-killing part of the wave.. Spock's body was part of the 'new matrix"

– NKCampbell
10 hours ago





1




1





Maybe he did, in the centre of the planet. Being confined, for his pride and rebellion, in something geometrically resembling the Ninth Circle of Hell seems appropriate for someone who quotes Milton.

– Gaultheria
7 hours ago





Maybe he did, in the centre of the planet. Being confined, for his pride and rebellion, in something geometrically resembling the Ninth Circle of Hell seems appropriate for someone who quotes Milton.

– Gaultheria
7 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















22














As observed in this dialogue from the movie:




McCoy: Dear Lord. You think we're intelligent enough to... suppose... what if this thing were used where life already exists?



Spock: It would destroy such life in favor of its new matrix.




Khan and his gang were literally at ground zero supplying the detonating Genesis Device with raw material. Spock came in much later, comparatively, to be exposed to a slow "simmer" of the cooling Genesis Effect.






share|improve this answer

























  • it might have khan dna in the future of the creation of that planet tho....

    – King of NES
    6 hours ago


















11














The Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect anybody.



Spock was very definitely dead when he was put into the torpedo. His death in the engine room was caused by his efforts to make sure the Enterprise escaped the Genesis Wave. His funeral and "burial at sea" was after the sun and planet had formed.



From The Wrath of Kahn (emphasis added):




KIRK: We are assembled here today to pay final respects to our honoured dead. And yet it should be noted that in the midst of our sorrow, this death takes place in the shadow of new life, the sunrise of a new world, a world that our beloved comrade gave his life to protect and nourish. He did not feel that sacrifice a vain or empty one... and we will not debate his profound wisdom at these proceedings. Of my friend, I can only say this. Of all the souls I have encountered in my travels, ...his was the most ...human.




It's uncertain if the Enterprise was was aiming to put it in orbit of the planet, have it incinerate in the atmosphere, or launch it into the star. The survey crew from the Grissom was clearly surprised to find it intact on the surface.



From The Search for Spock:




SAAVIK: Metallic mass.



DAVID: Close-range scan. ...A photon tube! ...Gravitational fields were in flux. ...It must have soft-landed!



ESTEBAN: In code to Starfleet. 'Captain's Spock's tube located on Genesis surface.'







share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    If the Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect anybody, then what resurrected Spock?

    – Jesse C. Slicer
    6 hours ago











  • @JesseC.Slicer That's beyond the scope of this question. It'd make a good separate question.

    – T.J.L.
    6 hours ago






  • 3





    @T.J.L.then perhaps it might be germane to constrain the big bold part of the answer to "The Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect Khan" since that's what the question asked.

    – Jesse C. Slicer
    6 hours ago











  • @JesseC.Slicer The only other person resurrected was Spock. The body of the text serves to point towards how he was resurrected, as evidence that Kahn didn't experience the same conditions.

    – T.J.L.
    5 hours ago


















2














The out-of-universe reason is that Ricardo Montalban was offered the chance to reprise his role (including in a guest appearance in TNG that would have been revealed as a holodeck episode) and turned it down.



Due to worsening injuries from a riding accident in 1951, he could only walk with great difficulty (as you can see at 0:13 of this ad from 1983) and, by the mid-1990s, was confined to a wheelchair.






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    Do you have a source for that?

    – Joe
    33 mins ago











  • I originally read it in a magazine article years ago by someone who wrote the episode and was told it that was the reason it was rejected. The plotline reminded me of “Ship in a Bottle,” but I could not tell you which came first and whether both writers came up with a similar concept independently.

    – Davislor
    25 mins ago












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "186"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f208067%2fwhy-didnt-khan-get-resurrected-in-the-genesis-explosion%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









22














As observed in this dialogue from the movie:




McCoy: Dear Lord. You think we're intelligent enough to... suppose... what if this thing were used where life already exists?



Spock: It would destroy such life in favor of its new matrix.




Khan and his gang were literally at ground zero supplying the detonating Genesis Device with raw material. Spock came in much later, comparatively, to be exposed to a slow "simmer" of the cooling Genesis Effect.






share|improve this answer

























  • it might have khan dna in the future of the creation of that planet tho....

    – King of NES
    6 hours ago















22














As observed in this dialogue from the movie:




McCoy: Dear Lord. You think we're intelligent enough to... suppose... what if this thing were used where life already exists?



Spock: It would destroy such life in favor of its new matrix.




Khan and his gang were literally at ground zero supplying the detonating Genesis Device with raw material. Spock came in much later, comparatively, to be exposed to a slow "simmer" of the cooling Genesis Effect.






share|improve this answer

























  • it might have khan dna in the future of the creation of that planet tho....

    – King of NES
    6 hours ago













22












22








22







As observed in this dialogue from the movie:




McCoy: Dear Lord. You think we're intelligent enough to... suppose... what if this thing were used where life already exists?



Spock: It would destroy such life in favor of its new matrix.




Khan and his gang were literally at ground zero supplying the detonating Genesis Device with raw material. Spock came in much later, comparatively, to be exposed to a slow "simmer" of the cooling Genesis Effect.






share|improve this answer















As observed in this dialogue from the movie:




McCoy: Dear Lord. You think we're intelligent enough to... suppose... what if this thing were used where life already exists?



Spock: It would destroy such life in favor of its new matrix.




Khan and his gang were literally at ground zero supplying the detonating Genesis Device with raw material. Spock came in much later, comparatively, to be exposed to a slow "simmer" of the cooling Genesis Effect.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 9 hours ago









Thunderforge

31.3k23148309




31.3k23148309










answered 9 hours ago









BlazeBlaze

1,558517




1,558517












  • it might have khan dna in the future of the creation of that planet tho....

    – King of NES
    6 hours ago

















  • it might have khan dna in the future of the creation of that planet tho....

    – King of NES
    6 hours ago
















it might have khan dna in the future of the creation of that planet tho....

– King of NES
6 hours ago





it might have khan dna in the future of the creation of that planet tho....

– King of NES
6 hours ago













11














The Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect anybody.



Spock was very definitely dead when he was put into the torpedo. His death in the engine room was caused by his efforts to make sure the Enterprise escaped the Genesis Wave. His funeral and "burial at sea" was after the sun and planet had formed.



From The Wrath of Kahn (emphasis added):




KIRK: We are assembled here today to pay final respects to our honoured dead. And yet it should be noted that in the midst of our sorrow, this death takes place in the shadow of new life, the sunrise of a new world, a world that our beloved comrade gave his life to protect and nourish. He did not feel that sacrifice a vain or empty one... and we will not debate his profound wisdom at these proceedings. Of my friend, I can only say this. Of all the souls I have encountered in my travels, ...his was the most ...human.




It's uncertain if the Enterprise was was aiming to put it in orbit of the planet, have it incinerate in the atmosphere, or launch it into the star. The survey crew from the Grissom was clearly surprised to find it intact on the surface.



From The Search for Spock:




SAAVIK: Metallic mass.



DAVID: Close-range scan. ...A photon tube! ...Gravitational fields were in flux. ...It must have soft-landed!



ESTEBAN: In code to Starfleet. 'Captain's Spock's tube located on Genesis surface.'







share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    If the Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect anybody, then what resurrected Spock?

    – Jesse C. Slicer
    6 hours ago











  • @JesseC.Slicer That's beyond the scope of this question. It'd make a good separate question.

    – T.J.L.
    6 hours ago






  • 3





    @T.J.L.then perhaps it might be germane to constrain the big bold part of the answer to "The Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect Khan" since that's what the question asked.

    – Jesse C. Slicer
    6 hours ago











  • @JesseC.Slicer The only other person resurrected was Spock. The body of the text serves to point towards how he was resurrected, as evidence that Kahn didn't experience the same conditions.

    – T.J.L.
    5 hours ago















11














The Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect anybody.



Spock was very definitely dead when he was put into the torpedo. His death in the engine room was caused by his efforts to make sure the Enterprise escaped the Genesis Wave. His funeral and "burial at sea" was after the sun and planet had formed.



From The Wrath of Kahn (emphasis added):




KIRK: We are assembled here today to pay final respects to our honoured dead. And yet it should be noted that in the midst of our sorrow, this death takes place in the shadow of new life, the sunrise of a new world, a world that our beloved comrade gave his life to protect and nourish. He did not feel that sacrifice a vain or empty one... and we will not debate his profound wisdom at these proceedings. Of my friend, I can only say this. Of all the souls I have encountered in my travels, ...his was the most ...human.




It's uncertain if the Enterprise was was aiming to put it in orbit of the planet, have it incinerate in the atmosphere, or launch it into the star. The survey crew from the Grissom was clearly surprised to find it intact on the surface.



From The Search for Spock:




SAAVIK: Metallic mass.



DAVID: Close-range scan. ...A photon tube! ...Gravitational fields were in flux. ...It must have soft-landed!



ESTEBAN: In code to Starfleet. 'Captain's Spock's tube located on Genesis surface.'







share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    If the Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect anybody, then what resurrected Spock?

    – Jesse C. Slicer
    6 hours ago











  • @JesseC.Slicer That's beyond the scope of this question. It'd make a good separate question.

    – T.J.L.
    6 hours ago






  • 3





    @T.J.L.then perhaps it might be germane to constrain the big bold part of the answer to "The Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect Khan" since that's what the question asked.

    – Jesse C. Slicer
    6 hours ago











  • @JesseC.Slicer The only other person resurrected was Spock. The body of the text serves to point towards how he was resurrected, as evidence that Kahn didn't experience the same conditions.

    – T.J.L.
    5 hours ago













11












11








11







The Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect anybody.



Spock was very definitely dead when he was put into the torpedo. His death in the engine room was caused by his efforts to make sure the Enterprise escaped the Genesis Wave. His funeral and "burial at sea" was after the sun and planet had formed.



From The Wrath of Kahn (emphasis added):




KIRK: We are assembled here today to pay final respects to our honoured dead. And yet it should be noted that in the midst of our sorrow, this death takes place in the shadow of new life, the sunrise of a new world, a world that our beloved comrade gave his life to protect and nourish. He did not feel that sacrifice a vain or empty one... and we will not debate his profound wisdom at these proceedings. Of my friend, I can only say this. Of all the souls I have encountered in my travels, ...his was the most ...human.




It's uncertain if the Enterprise was was aiming to put it in orbit of the planet, have it incinerate in the atmosphere, or launch it into the star. The survey crew from the Grissom was clearly surprised to find it intact on the surface.



From The Search for Spock:




SAAVIK: Metallic mass.



DAVID: Close-range scan. ...A photon tube! ...Gravitational fields were in flux. ...It must have soft-landed!



ESTEBAN: In code to Starfleet. 'Captain's Spock's tube located on Genesis surface.'







share|improve this answer















The Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect anybody.



Spock was very definitely dead when he was put into the torpedo. His death in the engine room was caused by his efforts to make sure the Enterprise escaped the Genesis Wave. His funeral and "burial at sea" was after the sun and planet had formed.



From The Wrath of Kahn (emphasis added):




KIRK: We are assembled here today to pay final respects to our honoured dead. And yet it should be noted that in the midst of our sorrow, this death takes place in the shadow of new life, the sunrise of a new world, a world that our beloved comrade gave his life to protect and nourish. He did not feel that sacrifice a vain or empty one... and we will not debate his profound wisdom at these proceedings. Of my friend, I can only say this. Of all the souls I have encountered in my travels, ...his was the most ...human.




It's uncertain if the Enterprise was was aiming to put it in orbit of the planet, have it incinerate in the atmosphere, or launch it into the star. The survey crew from the Grissom was clearly surprised to find it intact on the surface.



From The Search for Spock:




SAAVIK: Metallic mass.



DAVID: Close-range scan. ...A photon tube! ...Gravitational fields were in flux. ...It must have soft-landed!



ESTEBAN: In code to Starfleet. 'Captain's Spock's tube located on Genesis surface.'








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 6 hours ago

























answered 7 hours ago









T.J.L.T.J.L.

4,02431843




4,02431843







  • 1





    If the Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect anybody, then what resurrected Spock?

    – Jesse C. Slicer
    6 hours ago











  • @JesseC.Slicer That's beyond the scope of this question. It'd make a good separate question.

    – T.J.L.
    6 hours ago






  • 3





    @T.J.L.then perhaps it might be germane to constrain the big bold part of the answer to "The Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect Khan" since that's what the question asked.

    – Jesse C. Slicer
    6 hours ago











  • @JesseC.Slicer The only other person resurrected was Spock. The body of the text serves to point towards how he was resurrected, as evidence that Kahn didn't experience the same conditions.

    – T.J.L.
    5 hours ago












  • 1





    If the Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect anybody, then what resurrected Spock?

    – Jesse C. Slicer
    6 hours ago











  • @JesseC.Slicer That's beyond the scope of this question. It'd make a good separate question.

    – T.J.L.
    6 hours ago






  • 3





    @T.J.L.then perhaps it might be germane to constrain the big bold part of the answer to "The Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect Khan" since that's what the question asked.

    – Jesse C. Slicer
    6 hours ago











  • @JesseC.Slicer The only other person resurrected was Spock. The body of the text serves to point towards how he was resurrected, as evidence that Kahn didn't experience the same conditions.

    – T.J.L.
    5 hours ago







1




1





If the Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect anybody, then what resurrected Spock?

– Jesse C. Slicer
6 hours ago





If the Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect anybody, then what resurrected Spock?

– Jesse C. Slicer
6 hours ago













@JesseC.Slicer That's beyond the scope of this question. It'd make a good separate question.

– T.J.L.
6 hours ago





@JesseC.Slicer That's beyond the scope of this question. It'd make a good separate question.

– T.J.L.
6 hours ago




3




3





@T.J.L.then perhaps it might be germane to constrain the big bold part of the answer to "The Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect Khan" since that's what the question asked.

– Jesse C. Slicer
6 hours ago





@T.J.L.then perhaps it might be germane to constrain the big bold part of the answer to "The Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect Khan" since that's what the question asked.

– Jesse C. Slicer
6 hours ago













@JesseC.Slicer The only other person resurrected was Spock. The body of the text serves to point towards how he was resurrected, as evidence that Kahn didn't experience the same conditions.

– T.J.L.
5 hours ago





@JesseC.Slicer The only other person resurrected was Spock. The body of the text serves to point towards how he was resurrected, as evidence that Kahn didn't experience the same conditions.

– T.J.L.
5 hours ago











2














The out-of-universe reason is that Ricardo Montalban was offered the chance to reprise his role (including in a guest appearance in TNG that would have been revealed as a holodeck episode) and turned it down.



Due to worsening injuries from a riding accident in 1951, he could only walk with great difficulty (as you can see at 0:13 of this ad from 1983) and, by the mid-1990s, was confined to a wheelchair.






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    Do you have a source for that?

    – Joe
    33 mins ago











  • I originally read it in a magazine article years ago by someone who wrote the episode and was told it that was the reason it was rejected. The plotline reminded me of “Ship in a Bottle,” but I could not tell you which came first and whether both writers came up with a similar concept independently.

    – Davislor
    25 mins ago
















2














The out-of-universe reason is that Ricardo Montalban was offered the chance to reprise his role (including in a guest appearance in TNG that would have been revealed as a holodeck episode) and turned it down.



Due to worsening injuries from a riding accident in 1951, he could only walk with great difficulty (as you can see at 0:13 of this ad from 1983) and, by the mid-1990s, was confined to a wheelchair.






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    Do you have a source for that?

    – Joe
    33 mins ago











  • I originally read it in a magazine article years ago by someone who wrote the episode and was told it that was the reason it was rejected. The plotline reminded me of “Ship in a Bottle,” but I could not tell you which came first and whether both writers came up with a similar concept independently.

    – Davislor
    25 mins ago














2












2








2







The out-of-universe reason is that Ricardo Montalban was offered the chance to reprise his role (including in a guest appearance in TNG that would have been revealed as a holodeck episode) and turned it down.



Due to worsening injuries from a riding accident in 1951, he could only walk with great difficulty (as you can see at 0:13 of this ad from 1983) and, by the mid-1990s, was confined to a wheelchair.






share|improve this answer















The out-of-universe reason is that Ricardo Montalban was offered the chance to reprise his role (including in a guest appearance in TNG that would have been revealed as a holodeck episode) and turned it down.



Due to worsening injuries from a riding accident in 1951, he could only walk with great difficulty (as you can see at 0:13 of this ad from 1983) and, by the mid-1990s, was confined to a wheelchair.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 10 mins ago

























answered 45 mins ago









DavislorDavislor

1,50028




1,50028







  • 1





    Do you have a source for that?

    – Joe
    33 mins ago











  • I originally read it in a magazine article years ago by someone who wrote the episode and was told it that was the reason it was rejected. The plotline reminded me of “Ship in a Bottle,” but I could not tell you which came first and whether both writers came up with a similar concept independently.

    – Davislor
    25 mins ago













  • 1





    Do you have a source for that?

    – Joe
    33 mins ago











  • I originally read it in a magazine article years ago by someone who wrote the episode and was told it that was the reason it was rejected. The plotline reminded me of “Ship in a Bottle,” but I could not tell you which came first and whether both writers came up with a similar concept independently.

    – Davislor
    25 mins ago








1




1





Do you have a source for that?

– Joe
33 mins ago





Do you have a source for that?

– Joe
33 mins ago













I originally read it in a magazine article years ago by someone who wrote the episode and was told it that was the reason it was rejected. The plotline reminded me of “Ship in a Bottle,” but I could not tell you which came first and whether both writers came up with a similar concept independently.

– Davislor
25 mins ago






I originally read it in a magazine article years ago by someone who wrote the episode and was told it that was the reason it was rejected. The plotline reminded me of “Ship in a Bottle,” but I could not tell you which came first and whether both writers came up with a similar concept independently.

– Davislor
25 mins ago


















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f208067%2fwhy-didnt-khan-get-resurrected-in-the-genesis-explosion%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її