Can a caster that cast Polymorph on themselves stop concentrating at any point even if their Int is low? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow worldly is a polymorphic elf?How can I reliably turn a formulaic Eye range spell into a Touch spell?Damaging transmuted stateWhat is the meaning of 'permanent' in description of True Polymorph?How do multiple castings of True Polymorph interact?Can a Druid cast the spell Polymorph on themselves?Are the rules in the DMG for calculating encounter difficulty inaccurate?Can someone who has been Feebleminded have their Int and Cha scores changed via Polymorph?When exactly can a caster stop concentrating on a spell?Is a low Constitution frontline EK/War Wizard viable or is the low HP a deal-breaker at higher levels? Would the Tough feat constitute a solution?

How should I support this large drywall patch?

How do spells that require an ability check vs. the caster's spell save DC work?

Describing a person. What needs to be mentioned?

MAZDA 3 2006 (UK) - poor acceleration then takes off at 3250 revs

How can I get through very long and very dry, but also very useful technical documents when learning a new tool?

How to count occurrences of text in a file?

I believe this to be a fraud - hired, then asked to cash check and send cash as Bitcoin

Should I tutor a student who I know has cheated on their homework?

The King's new dress

Why doesn't a table tennis ball float on the surface? How do we calculate buoyancy here?

Whats the best way to handle refactoring a big file?

Increase performance creating Mandelbrot set in python

Science fiction novels about a solar system spanning civilisation where people change their bodies at will

How to safely derail a train during transit?

Grabbing quick drinks

What is the difference between "behavior" and "behaviour"?

Putting a 2D region plot under a 3D plot

What makes a siege story/plot interesting?

Return of the Riley Riddles in Reverse

Is it okay to store user locations?

Why does C# sound extremely flat when saxophone is tuned to G?

Can a caster that cast Polymorph on themselves stop concentrating at any point even if their Int is low?

Solution of this Diophantine Equation

What's the point of interval inversion?



Can a caster that cast Polymorph on themselves stop concentrating at any point even if their Int is low?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow worldly is a polymorphic elf?How can I reliably turn a formulaic Eye range spell into a Touch spell?Damaging transmuted stateWhat is the meaning of 'permanent' in description of True Polymorph?How do multiple castings of True Polymorph interact?Can a Druid cast the spell Polymorph on themselves?Are the rules in the DMG for calculating encounter difficulty inaccurate?Can someone who has been Feebleminded have their Int and Cha scores changed via Polymorph?When exactly can a caster stop concentrating on a spell?Is a low Constitution frontline EK/War Wizard viable or is the low HP a deal-breaker at higher levels? Would the Tough feat constitute a solution?










11












$begingroup$


I was playing a moon druid and cast the polymorph spell on myself, changing me into a T-Rex, which caused my Int to become 2 and my Wis 12. I realized my targets had immunity to non-magical damage which is all a T-Rex can do, so I wanted to stop concentrating.



I made the check to determine that my current form could not affect the creatures, but when I stated that I would stop concentrating, the DM said that, as a T-Rex, my Int was too low for me to realize that I had a spell I was concentrating on that was keeping me in this form. So, I was stuck as T-Rex until the HP depleted or the spell ended.



Was my DM correct or can a polymorphed creature still choose to end concentration?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Carl Bozeman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for clarifying the system! You can check out the tour as an introduction to the site and the help center for further guidance. Good luck and happy gaming!
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    We can definitely answer the "can a polymorphed creature end concentration on a spell", but the "why would the t-rex concentration" is only going to be speculation, and is probably not a good fit for the site.
    $endgroup$
    – David Coffron
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DavidCoffron "Why" in this context is not speculative - it is about specific situation when player looses ability to decide for his character, and rules that govern that situation, if any. Lack of "why" in the rules (if that's the case) would be helpful answer, I believe. Am I right, Carl Bozeman? I agree it could be worded a bit better.
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    11 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Molot is correct that is what I meant but couldn't figure out how to address it.
    $endgroup$
    – Carl Bozeman
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @CarlBozeman glad to help. Now we just need someone who can edit this clarification into your question. My English skill is not enough to do it, I'm afraid.
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    10 hours ago















11












$begingroup$


I was playing a moon druid and cast the polymorph spell on myself, changing me into a T-Rex, which caused my Int to become 2 and my Wis 12. I realized my targets had immunity to non-magical damage which is all a T-Rex can do, so I wanted to stop concentrating.



I made the check to determine that my current form could not affect the creatures, but when I stated that I would stop concentrating, the DM said that, as a T-Rex, my Int was too low for me to realize that I had a spell I was concentrating on that was keeping me in this form. So, I was stuck as T-Rex until the HP depleted or the spell ended.



Was my DM correct or can a polymorphed creature still choose to end concentration?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Carl Bozeman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for clarifying the system! You can check out the tour as an introduction to the site and the help center for further guidance. Good luck and happy gaming!
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    We can definitely answer the "can a polymorphed creature end concentration on a spell", but the "why would the t-rex concentration" is only going to be speculation, and is probably not a good fit for the site.
    $endgroup$
    – David Coffron
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DavidCoffron "Why" in this context is not speculative - it is about specific situation when player looses ability to decide for his character, and rules that govern that situation, if any. Lack of "why" in the rules (if that's the case) would be helpful answer, I believe. Am I right, Carl Bozeman? I agree it could be worded a bit better.
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    11 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Molot is correct that is what I meant but couldn't figure out how to address it.
    $endgroup$
    – Carl Bozeman
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @CarlBozeman glad to help. Now we just need someone who can edit this clarification into your question. My English skill is not enough to do it, I'm afraid.
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    10 hours ago













11












11








11





$begingroup$


I was playing a moon druid and cast the polymorph spell on myself, changing me into a T-Rex, which caused my Int to become 2 and my Wis 12. I realized my targets had immunity to non-magical damage which is all a T-Rex can do, so I wanted to stop concentrating.



I made the check to determine that my current form could not affect the creatures, but when I stated that I would stop concentrating, the DM said that, as a T-Rex, my Int was too low for me to realize that I had a spell I was concentrating on that was keeping me in this form. So, I was stuck as T-Rex until the HP depleted or the spell ended.



Was my DM correct or can a polymorphed creature still choose to end concentration?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Carl Bozeman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




I was playing a moon druid and cast the polymorph spell on myself, changing me into a T-Rex, which caused my Int to become 2 and my Wis 12. I realized my targets had immunity to non-magical damage which is all a T-Rex can do, so I wanted to stop concentrating.



I made the check to determine that my current form could not affect the creatures, but when I stated that I would stop concentrating, the DM said that, as a T-Rex, my Int was too low for me to realize that I had a spell I was concentrating on that was keeping me in this form. So, I was stuck as T-Rex until the HP depleted or the spell ended.



Was my DM correct or can a polymorphed creature still choose to end concentration?







dnd-5e spells polymorph concentration






share|improve this question









New contributor




Carl Bozeman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Carl Bozeman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 6 hours ago









V2Blast

25.7k488158




25.7k488158






New contributor




Carl Bozeman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 11 hours ago









Carl BozemanCarl Bozeman

565




565




New contributor




Carl Bozeman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Carl Bozeman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Carl Bozeman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for clarifying the system! You can check out the tour as an introduction to the site and the help center for further guidance. Good luck and happy gaming!
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    We can definitely answer the "can a polymorphed creature end concentration on a spell", but the "why would the t-rex concentration" is only going to be speculation, and is probably not a good fit for the site.
    $endgroup$
    – David Coffron
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DavidCoffron "Why" in this context is not speculative - it is about specific situation when player looses ability to decide for his character, and rules that govern that situation, if any. Lack of "why" in the rules (if that's the case) would be helpful answer, I believe. Am I right, Carl Bozeman? I agree it could be worded a bit better.
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    11 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Molot is correct that is what I meant but couldn't figure out how to address it.
    $endgroup$
    – Carl Bozeman
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @CarlBozeman glad to help. Now we just need someone who can edit this clarification into your question. My English skill is not enough to do it, I'm afraid.
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    10 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for clarifying the system! You can check out the tour as an introduction to the site and the help center for further guidance. Good luck and happy gaming!
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    We can definitely answer the "can a polymorphed creature end concentration on a spell", but the "why would the t-rex concentration" is only going to be speculation, and is probably not a good fit for the site.
    $endgroup$
    – David Coffron
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DavidCoffron "Why" in this context is not speculative - it is about specific situation when player looses ability to decide for his character, and rules that govern that situation, if any. Lack of "why" in the rules (if that's the case) would be helpful answer, I believe. Am I right, Carl Bozeman? I agree it could be worded a bit better.
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    11 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Molot is correct that is what I meant but couldn't figure out how to address it.
    $endgroup$
    – Carl Bozeman
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @CarlBozeman glad to help. Now we just need someone who can edit this clarification into your question. My English skill is not enough to do it, I'm afraid.
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    10 hours ago















$begingroup$
Thank you for clarifying the system! You can check out the tour as an introduction to the site and the help center for further guidance. Good luck and happy gaming!
$endgroup$
– Sdjz
11 hours ago




$begingroup$
Thank you for clarifying the system! You can check out the tour as an introduction to the site and the help center for further guidance. Good luck and happy gaming!
$endgroup$
– Sdjz
11 hours ago












$begingroup$
We can definitely answer the "can a polymorphed creature end concentration on a spell", but the "why would the t-rex concentration" is only going to be speculation, and is probably not a good fit for the site.
$endgroup$
– David Coffron
11 hours ago




$begingroup$
We can definitely answer the "can a polymorphed creature end concentration on a spell", but the "why would the t-rex concentration" is only going to be speculation, and is probably not a good fit for the site.
$endgroup$
– David Coffron
11 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@DavidCoffron "Why" in this context is not speculative - it is about specific situation when player looses ability to decide for his character, and rules that govern that situation, if any. Lack of "why" in the rules (if that's the case) would be helpful answer, I believe. Am I right, Carl Bozeman? I agree it could be worded a bit better.
$endgroup$
– Mołot
11 hours ago





$begingroup$
@DavidCoffron "Why" in this context is not speculative - it is about specific situation when player looses ability to decide for his character, and rules that govern that situation, if any. Lack of "why" in the rules (if that's the case) would be helpful answer, I believe. Am I right, Carl Bozeman? I agree it could be worded a bit better.
$endgroup$
– Mołot
11 hours ago













$begingroup$
Molot is correct that is what I meant but couldn't figure out how to address it.
$endgroup$
– Carl Bozeman
11 hours ago




$begingroup$
Molot is correct that is what I meant but couldn't figure out how to address it.
$endgroup$
– Carl Bozeman
11 hours ago












$begingroup$
@CarlBozeman glad to help. Now we just need someone who can edit this clarification into your question. My English skill is not enough to do it, I'm afraid.
$endgroup$
– Mołot
10 hours ago




$begingroup$
@CarlBozeman glad to help. Now we just need someone who can edit this clarification into your question. My English skill is not enough to do it, I'm afraid.
$endgroup$
– Mołot
10 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















18












$begingroup$

There is no intelligence limit on the rules for concentration.



Nothing in the rules dictate that a creature has to have a sufficiently high intelligence to maintain or drop concentration. In fact, there are examples of extremely low intelligence creatures fully utilizing concentration spells. See the Neothelid in Volo's Guide to Monsters (p. 181):




INT

3 (-4)



[...]



Innate Spellcasting (Psionics).



[...]



At will: levitate




If the creature, who is not much smarter than a t-rex, is able to use a concentration spell like levitate, there is hardly a reason a t-rex wouldn't be able to use one to full effect as well.



Your DM may be using a houserule.



It is possible that your DM is implementing a houserule where intelligence has more of an impact than in the base game. If this is the case, he is the only one who can answer questions like why a t-rex could/would concentrate on a spell at all.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    11












    $begingroup$

    RAW implies you can end concentration, but a shaky argument can be made against



    According to PHB, concentration is very easy to end.




    You can end concentration at any time (no action required).




    Additionally, the Polymorph spell states:




    [The target] retains its alignment and personality. [...] The creature is limited in the actions it can perform by the nature of its new from, and it can't speak, cast spells, or take any action that requires hands or speech.




    Nothing here says you can't end concentration, which seems to be a simple mental activity.



    The one argument I can see is that the beast couldn't have started concentration (part of casting the spell), but that would imply the beast can't maintain concentration either, which would never allow you to successfully Polymorph yourself. If the DM is prohibiting ending concentration, he/she should prohibit Polymorphing oneself.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      That's what I was thinking
      $endgroup$
      – Carl Bozeman
      10 hours ago


















    -1












    $begingroup$

    No rule prevents you from ending concentration



    The PHB states:




    You can end concentration at any time (no action required).




    There simply isn't a rule which says that you cannot end concentration because your intelligence (or any other Ability for that matter) is too low.



    Choosing to end concentration is metagaming



    Metagaming is handled differently at different tables, but it's generally reasonable for a DM to request that you play a character as though that character were lacking a piece of information.



    Even though you know that ending concentration is the best course of action, a T-Rex would not understand the same. Consider the thought process required in that situation:




    1. I am not dealing damage,

    2. because my attacks are non-magical,

    3. because I used magic on myself and

    4. I can stop that magic if I end concentration.



    It's entirely reasonable to assume that a beast with 2 intelligence is incapable of understanding magic and would be unable to think past point 1.



    Case in point, here is a dog struggling with the ramifications (pun intended) of a big stick. This dog does not immediatelly understand that simply turning its head is enough to move past the fence, even though it's hilariously obvious to us:



    A poor doggo



    A mastiff (3 int, 12 wis, 7 cha) has similar mental scores to a T-Rex (2 int, 12 wis, 9 cha) and I think we can all agree that magic is more complicated than a big stick.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "122"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );






      Carl Bozeman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144088%2fcan-a-caster-that-cast-polymorph-on-themselves-stop-concentrating-at-any-point-e%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      18












      $begingroup$

      There is no intelligence limit on the rules for concentration.



      Nothing in the rules dictate that a creature has to have a sufficiently high intelligence to maintain or drop concentration. In fact, there are examples of extremely low intelligence creatures fully utilizing concentration spells. See the Neothelid in Volo's Guide to Monsters (p. 181):




      INT

      3 (-4)



      [...]



      Innate Spellcasting (Psionics).



      [...]



      At will: levitate




      If the creature, who is not much smarter than a t-rex, is able to use a concentration spell like levitate, there is hardly a reason a t-rex wouldn't be able to use one to full effect as well.



      Your DM may be using a houserule.



      It is possible that your DM is implementing a houserule where intelligence has more of an impact than in the base game. If this is the case, he is the only one who can answer questions like why a t-rex could/would concentrate on a spell at all.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$

















        18












        $begingroup$

        There is no intelligence limit on the rules for concentration.



        Nothing in the rules dictate that a creature has to have a sufficiently high intelligence to maintain or drop concentration. In fact, there are examples of extremely low intelligence creatures fully utilizing concentration spells. See the Neothelid in Volo's Guide to Monsters (p. 181):




        INT

        3 (-4)



        [...]



        Innate Spellcasting (Psionics).



        [...]



        At will: levitate




        If the creature, who is not much smarter than a t-rex, is able to use a concentration spell like levitate, there is hardly a reason a t-rex wouldn't be able to use one to full effect as well.



        Your DM may be using a houserule.



        It is possible that your DM is implementing a houserule where intelligence has more of an impact than in the base game. If this is the case, he is the only one who can answer questions like why a t-rex could/would concentrate on a spell at all.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$















          18












          18








          18





          $begingroup$

          There is no intelligence limit on the rules for concentration.



          Nothing in the rules dictate that a creature has to have a sufficiently high intelligence to maintain or drop concentration. In fact, there are examples of extremely low intelligence creatures fully utilizing concentration spells. See the Neothelid in Volo's Guide to Monsters (p. 181):




          INT

          3 (-4)



          [...]



          Innate Spellcasting (Psionics).



          [...]



          At will: levitate




          If the creature, who is not much smarter than a t-rex, is able to use a concentration spell like levitate, there is hardly a reason a t-rex wouldn't be able to use one to full effect as well.



          Your DM may be using a houserule.



          It is possible that your DM is implementing a houserule where intelligence has more of an impact than in the base game. If this is the case, he is the only one who can answer questions like why a t-rex could/would concentrate on a spell at all.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          There is no intelligence limit on the rules for concentration.



          Nothing in the rules dictate that a creature has to have a sufficiently high intelligence to maintain or drop concentration. In fact, there are examples of extremely low intelligence creatures fully utilizing concentration spells. See the Neothelid in Volo's Guide to Monsters (p. 181):




          INT

          3 (-4)



          [...]



          Innate Spellcasting (Psionics).



          [...]



          At will: levitate




          If the creature, who is not much smarter than a t-rex, is able to use a concentration spell like levitate, there is hardly a reason a t-rex wouldn't be able to use one to full effect as well.



          Your DM may be using a houserule.



          It is possible that your DM is implementing a houserule where intelligence has more of an impact than in the base game. If this is the case, he is the only one who can answer questions like why a t-rex could/would concentrate on a spell at all.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 6 hours ago









          V2Blast

          25.7k488158




          25.7k488158










          answered 10 hours ago









          David CoffronDavid Coffron

          38.5k3133273




          38.5k3133273























              11












              $begingroup$

              RAW implies you can end concentration, but a shaky argument can be made against



              According to PHB, concentration is very easy to end.




              You can end concentration at any time (no action required).




              Additionally, the Polymorph spell states:




              [The target] retains its alignment and personality. [...] The creature is limited in the actions it can perform by the nature of its new from, and it can't speak, cast spells, or take any action that requires hands or speech.




              Nothing here says you can't end concentration, which seems to be a simple mental activity.



              The one argument I can see is that the beast couldn't have started concentration (part of casting the spell), but that would imply the beast can't maintain concentration either, which would never allow you to successfully Polymorph yourself. If the DM is prohibiting ending concentration, he/she should prohibit Polymorphing oneself.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$












              • $begingroup$
                That's what I was thinking
                $endgroup$
                – Carl Bozeman
                10 hours ago















              11












              $begingroup$

              RAW implies you can end concentration, but a shaky argument can be made against



              According to PHB, concentration is very easy to end.




              You can end concentration at any time (no action required).




              Additionally, the Polymorph spell states:




              [The target] retains its alignment and personality. [...] The creature is limited in the actions it can perform by the nature of its new from, and it can't speak, cast spells, or take any action that requires hands or speech.




              Nothing here says you can't end concentration, which seems to be a simple mental activity.



              The one argument I can see is that the beast couldn't have started concentration (part of casting the spell), but that would imply the beast can't maintain concentration either, which would never allow you to successfully Polymorph yourself. If the DM is prohibiting ending concentration, he/she should prohibit Polymorphing oneself.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$












              • $begingroup$
                That's what I was thinking
                $endgroup$
                – Carl Bozeman
                10 hours ago













              11












              11








              11





              $begingroup$

              RAW implies you can end concentration, but a shaky argument can be made against



              According to PHB, concentration is very easy to end.




              You can end concentration at any time (no action required).




              Additionally, the Polymorph spell states:




              [The target] retains its alignment and personality. [...] The creature is limited in the actions it can perform by the nature of its new from, and it can't speak, cast spells, or take any action that requires hands or speech.




              Nothing here says you can't end concentration, which seems to be a simple mental activity.



              The one argument I can see is that the beast couldn't have started concentration (part of casting the spell), but that would imply the beast can't maintain concentration either, which would never allow you to successfully Polymorph yourself. If the DM is prohibiting ending concentration, he/she should prohibit Polymorphing oneself.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$



              RAW implies you can end concentration, but a shaky argument can be made against



              According to PHB, concentration is very easy to end.




              You can end concentration at any time (no action required).




              Additionally, the Polymorph spell states:




              [The target] retains its alignment and personality. [...] The creature is limited in the actions it can perform by the nature of its new from, and it can't speak, cast spells, or take any action that requires hands or speech.




              Nothing here says you can't end concentration, which seems to be a simple mental activity.



              The one argument I can see is that the beast couldn't have started concentration (part of casting the spell), but that would imply the beast can't maintain concentration either, which would never allow you to successfully Polymorph yourself. If the DM is prohibiting ending concentration, he/she should prohibit Polymorphing oneself.







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited 6 hours ago









              V2Blast

              25.7k488158




              25.7k488158










              answered 10 hours ago









              Sean ScottSean Scott

              25219




              25219











              • $begingroup$
                That's what I was thinking
                $endgroup$
                – Carl Bozeman
                10 hours ago
















              • $begingroup$
                That's what I was thinking
                $endgroup$
                – Carl Bozeman
                10 hours ago















              $begingroup$
              That's what I was thinking
              $endgroup$
              – Carl Bozeman
              10 hours ago




              $begingroup$
              That's what I was thinking
              $endgroup$
              – Carl Bozeman
              10 hours ago











              -1












              $begingroup$

              No rule prevents you from ending concentration



              The PHB states:




              You can end concentration at any time (no action required).




              There simply isn't a rule which says that you cannot end concentration because your intelligence (or any other Ability for that matter) is too low.



              Choosing to end concentration is metagaming



              Metagaming is handled differently at different tables, but it's generally reasonable for a DM to request that you play a character as though that character were lacking a piece of information.



              Even though you know that ending concentration is the best course of action, a T-Rex would not understand the same. Consider the thought process required in that situation:




              1. I am not dealing damage,

              2. because my attacks are non-magical,

              3. because I used magic on myself and

              4. I can stop that magic if I end concentration.



              It's entirely reasonable to assume that a beast with 2 intelligence is incapable of understanding magic and would be unable to think past point 1.



              Case in point, here is a dog struggling with the ramifications (pun intended) of a big stick. This dog does not immediatelly understand that simply turning its head is enough to move past the fence, even though it's hilariously obvious to us:



              A poor doggo



              A mastiff (3 int, 12 wis, 7 cha) has similar mental scores to a T-Rex (2 int, 12 wis, 9 cha) and I think we can all agree that magic is more complicated than a big stick.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$

















                -1












                $begingroup$

                No rule prevents you from ending concentration



                The PHB states:




                You can end concentration at any time (no action required).




                There simply isn't a rule which says that you cannot end concentration because your intelligence (or any other Ability for that matter) is too low.



                Choosing to end concentration is metagaming



                Metagaming is handled differently at different tables, but it's generally reasonable for a DM to request that you play a character as though that character were lacking a piece of information.



                Even though you know that ending concentration is the best course of action, a T-Rex would not understand the same. Consider the thought process required in that situation:




                1. I am not dealing damage,

                2. because my attacks are non-magical,

                3. because I used magic on myself and

                4. I can stop that magic if I end concentration.



                It's entirely reasonable to assume that a beast with 2 intelligence is incapable of understanding magic and would be unable to think past point 1.



                Case in point, here is a dog struggling with the ramifications (pun intended) of a big stick. This dog does not immediatelly understand that simply turning its head is enough to move past the fence, even though it's hilariously obvious to us:



                A poor doggo



                A mastiff (3 int, 12 wis, 7 cha) has similar mental scores to a T-Rex (2 int, 12 wis, 9 cha) and I think we can all agree that magic is more complicated than a big stick.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$















                  -1












                  -1








                  -1





                  $begingroup$

                  No rule prevents you from ending concentration



                  The PHB states:




                  You can end concentration at any time (no action required).




                  There simply isn't a rule which says that you cannot end concentration because your intelligence (or any other Ability for that matter) is too low.



                  Choosing to end concentration is metagaming



                  Metagaming is handled differently at different tables, but it's generally reasonable for a DM to request that you play a character as though that character were lacking a piece of information.



                  Even though you know that ending concentration is the best course of action, a T-Rex would not understand the same. Consider the thought process required in that situation:




                  1. I am not dealing damage,

                  2. because my attacks are non-magical,

                  3. because I used magic on myself and

                  4. I can stop that magic if I end concentration.



                  It's entirely reasonable to assume that a beast with 2 intelligence is incapable of understanding magic and would be unable to think past point 1.



                  Case in point, here is a dog struggling with the ramifications (pun intended) of a big stick. This dog does not immediatelly understand that simply turning its head is enough to move past the fence, even though it's hilariously obvious to us:



                  A poor doggo



                  A mastiff (3 int, 12 wis, 7 cha) has similar mental scores to a T-Rex (2 int, 12 wis, 9 cha) and I think we can all agree that magic is more complicated than a big stick.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  No rule prevents you from ending concentration



                  The PHB states:




                  You can end concentration at any time (no action required).




                  There simply isn't a rule which says that you cannot end concentration because your intelligence (or any other Ability for that matter) is too low.



                  Choosing to end concentration is metagaming



                  Metagaming is handled differently at different tables, but it's generally reasonable for a DM to request that you play a character as though that character were lacking a piece of information.



                  Even though you know that ending concentration is the best course of action, a T-Rex would not understand the same. Consider the thought process required in that situation:




                  1. I am not dealing damage,

                  2. because my attacks are non-magical,

                  3. because I used magic on myself and

                  4. I can stop that magic if I end concentration.



                  It's entirely reasonable to assume that a beast with 2 intelligence is incapable of understanding magic and would be unable to think past point 1.



                  Case in point, here is a dog struggling with the ramifications (pun intended) of a big stick. This dog does not immediatelly understand that simply turning its head is enough to move past the fence, even though it's hilariously obvious to us:



                  A poor doggo



                  A mastiff (3 int, 12 wis, 7 cha) has similar mental scores to a T-Rex (2 int, 12 wis, 9 cha) and I think we can all agree that magic is more complicated than a big stick.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 2 hours ago









                  V2Blast

                  25.7k488158




                  25.7k488158










                  answered 2 hours ago









                  RuseRuse

                  6,88011557




                  6,88011557




















                      Carl Bozeman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      Carl Bozeman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      Carl Bozeman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                      Carl Bozeman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144088%2fcan-a-caster-that-cast-polymorph-on-themselves-stop-concentrating-at-any-point-e%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                      Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                      Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її