What can damage a lich in an antimagic field?Does every damage type have a way to deal nonmagical damage?Does ki count as magic for the purpose of an antimagic field, or is it only fluff?Pact of the Blade and Antimagic FieldsCan Catapult's target be in an antimagic field?Effects of Non-Damage Spells (Antimagic Field) on CRIs this Library-encounter balanced?Pact of the Blade and Antimagic FieldsIs this homebrew mechanoid race balanced?Under what circumstances does an antimagic field suppress the casting of a spell?Is a shield guardian affected by demonic madness in the Out of the Abyss adventure?Can a non-magical “Detect Magic”-type trait sense magic when used within an Antimagic Field?What damaging options does a lich have while in an anti-magic field?

Is there a reason behind the 'Ending' joke?

Is It Possible to Make a Virus That Acts as an Anti-virus?

Does Australia produce unique 'specialty steel'?

one-liner vs script

Little Endian Number to String Conversion

What does IKEA-like mean?

Can you decide not to sneak into a room after seeing your roll?

Slow coworker receiving compliments while I receive complaints

How to remind myself to lock my doors

'Cheddar goes "good" with burgers?' Can "go" be seen as a verb of the senses?

Test if two food are the same

Why is the intercept changing in a logistic regression when all predictors are standardized?

Modern warfare theory in a medieval setting

What kind of tools would be used to carve bone?

What can I do to avoid potential charges for bribery?

Is there a way to make a Minor key sound "less dark"?

From Plate to State

Is data science mathematically interesting?

D&D Monsters and Copyright

Suspicious crontab entry

Chain with double bond or triple bond

What is joint estimation?

Can you be promoted and then fired for-cause? (Performance)

Why didn't Kes send Voyager home?



What can damage a lich in an antimagic field?


Does every damage type have a way to deal nonmagical damage?Does ki count as magic for the purpose of an antimagic field, or is it only fluff?Pact of the Blade and Antimagic FieldsCan Catapult's target be in an antimagic field?Effects of Non-Damage Spells (Antimagic Field) on CRIs this Library-encounter balanced?Pact of the Blade and Antimagic FieldsIs this homebrew mechanoid race balanced?Under what circumstances does an antimagic field suppress the casting of a spell?Is a shield guardian affected by demonic madness in the Out of the Abyss adventure?Can a non-magical “Detect Magic”-type trait sense magic when used within an Antimagic Field?What damaging options does a lich have while in an anti-magic field?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;









6














$begingroup$


An antimagic field spell makes magical weapons into normal weapons for purposes of attack. Magical spells also lose their effects.



A lich is listed as having damage immunities to: Poison; Bludgeoning, Piercing, and Slashing From Nonmagical Attacks. Liches also have condition immunities to: Charmed, Exhaustion, Frightened, Paralyzed, and Poisoned.



The only effects that penetrate an antimagic field are artifacts and effects from deities. Given the immunities of a lich, this seems to leave only fire and acid as a way to damage liches apart from artifacts and deities.



However, Jeremy Crawford previously wrote, "Antimagic field has no effect on a creature's immunities, unless those immunities are sustained by magic."



Are a lich's immunities "sustained by magic" as described by Crawford and go away in an antimagic field? More generally, apart from artifacts, deities, and fire, what can damage a lich in an antimagic field?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$















  • $begingroup$
    Somewhat related: Does every damage type have a way to deal nonmagical damage?
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    8 hours ago

















6














$begingroup$


An antimagic field spell makes magical weapons into normal weapons for purposes of attack. Magical spells also lose their effects.



A lich is listed as having damage immunities to: Poison; Bludgeoning, Piercing, and Slashing From Nonmagical Attacks. Liches also have condition immunities to: Charmed, Exhaustion, Frightened, Paralyzed, and Poisoned.



The only effects that penetrate an antimagic field are artifacts and effects from deities. Given the immunities of a lich, this seems to leave only fire and acid as a way to damage liches apart from artifacts and deities.



However, Jeremy Crawford previously wrote, "Antimagic field has no effect on a creature's immunities, unless those immunities are sustained by magic."



Are a lich's immunities "sustained by magic" as described by Crawford and go away in an antimagic field? More generally, apart from artifacts, deities, and fire, what can damage a lich in an antimagic field?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$















  • $begingroup$
    Somewhat related: Does every damage type have a way to deal nonmagical damage?
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    8 hours ago













6












6








6





$begingroup$


An antimagic field spell makes magical weapons into normal weapons for purposes of attack. Magical spells also lose their effects.



A lich is listed as having damage immunities to: Poison; Bludgeoning, Piercing, and Slashing From Nonmagical Attacks. Liches also have condition immunities to: Charmed, Exhaustion, Frightened, Paralyzed, and Poisoned.



The only effects that penetrate an antimagic field are artifacts and effects from deities. Given the immunities of a lich, this seems to leave only fire and acid as a way to damage liches apart from artifacts and deities.



However, Jeremy Crawford previously wrote, "Antimagic field has no effect on a creature's immunities, unless those immunities are sustained by magic."



Are a lich's immunities "sustained by magic" as described by Crawford and go away in an antimagic field? More generally, apart from artifacts, deities, and fire, what can damage a lich in an antimagic field?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




An antimagic field spell makes magical weapons into normal weapons for purposes of attack. Magical spells also lose their effects.



A lich is listed as having damage immunities to: Poison; Bludgeoning, Piercing, and Slashing From Nonmagical Attacks. Liches also have condition immunities to: Charmed, Exhaustion, Frightened, Paralyzed, and Poisoned.



The only effects that penetrate an antimagic field are artifacts and effects from deities. Given the immunities of a lich, this seems to leave only fire and acid as a way to damage liches apart from artifacts and deities.



However, Jeremy Crawford previously wrote, "Antimagic field has no effect on a creature's immunities, unless those immunities are sustained by magic."



Are a lich's immunities "sustained by magic" as described by Crawford and go away in an antimagic field? More generally, apart from artifacts, deities, and fire, what can damage a lich in an antimagic field?







dnd-5e monsters combat damage antimagic-field






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question



share|improve this question








edited 8 hours ago









NautArch

80.6k16 gold badges312 silver badges528 bronze badges




80.6k16 gold badges312 silver badges528 bronze badges










asked 8 hours ago









PraxitelesPraxiteles

5,2693 gold badges32 silver badges116 bronze badges




5,2693 gold badges32 silver badges116 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    Somewhat related: Does every damage type have a way to deal nonmagical damage?
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    8 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Somewhat related: Does every damage type have a way to deal nonmagical damage?
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    8 hours ago















$begingroup$
Somewhat related: Does every damage type have a way to deal nonmagical damage?
$endgroup$
– Sdjz
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
Somewhat related: Does every damage type have a way to deal nonmagical damage?
$endgroup$
– Sdjz
8 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















5
















$begingroup$

The lich retains its immunities but can still be damaged



The lich's immunities are not sustained through a magical effect or spell which are what anti-magic field suppresses. They are inherent to the lich and are not mentioned as being "magical".



That said, there are still ways to damage a lich, for example Bludgeoning/Piercing/Slashing damage that is not from an attack. For example, the catapult spell may work (discussed here) or fall damage. Also as user @guildsbounty points out, objects falling onto the lich will also work, perhaps you could make the ceiling collapse. Another method is non-magical elemental damage which is available through various features and items such as alchemists' fire. This answer to the question "Does every damage type have a way to deal nonmagical damage?" shows ways for PC's to have non-magical elemental damage.






share|improve this answer












$endgroup$










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure Catapult would work. If the magical bit goes away when it enters the AMF and the object hits the lich, then you've got non-magical bludgeoning and that immunity.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @nautarch Oh right! That's a great point
    $endgroup$
    – Medix2
    7 hours ago


















2
















$begingroup$

Class abilities and certain items



Alchemist's fire, vials of acid and holy water are all non-magical items which can cause damage the lich does not have immunity to.



Certain classes gain abilities that can allow them to damage a lich even inside of an antimagic field. Some examples:



Monk's at 6th level gain the Ki-Empowered Strikes ability which makes their unarmed strikes count as magical for the purpose of bypassing damage resistance and immunity. This is not actually a magical ability so the AMF won't stop it.



Clerics who have the life domain gain the Divine Strike ability at level 8 which makes their weapon attacks do extra radiant damage.



Paladins gain Improved Divine Smite at level 11 which gives them extra radiant damage on their melee attacks.



Warlocks with the Fiend pact gain Hurl Through Hell at level 14 which can send the lich through the lower planes and make them take psychic damage on their return.






share|improve this answer












$endgroup$










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure how "counts as magical" means isn't magical for AMF. Ki empowered strikes are specifically covered in this question and guessing some others are also effected in AMF.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The language used tells you as much. If Ki empowered strikes were magical it would simply say they are magical. Since it says "counts as magical" it means they are treated as have the benefit of being magical for damage resistance/immunity, but they aren't actually magical.
    $endgroup$
    – Allan Mills
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If it counts as magical, that seems like it's magical.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Both answers to the question "Does ki count as magic for the purpose of an antimagic field, or is it only fluff?" explain that Ki-Empowered Strikes would be suppressed.
    $endgroup$
    – Medix2
    3 hours ago



















0
















$begingroup$

There are a few skills/class features that should still work



For instance, a 6th level monk gets "Ki-Empowered Strikes" which:




Starting at 6th level, your unarmed strikes count as magical for the purpose of overcoming resistance and immunity to nonmagical attacks and damage.




Similarly, the Warlock's Pact of the Blade:




You can use your action to create a pact weapon in your empty hand. You can choose the form that this melee weapon takes each time you create it (see chapter 5 for weapon options). You are proficient with it while you wield it. This weapon counts as magical for the purpose of overcoming resistance and immunity to nonmagical attacks and damage.




Even the lowly Beast Master Ranger, at 7th level gains Exceptional Training:




Beginning at 7th level, on any of your turns when your beast companion doesn't attack, you can use a bonus action to command the beast to take the Dash, Disengage, or Help action on its turn. In addition, the beast's attacks now count as magical for the purpose of overcoming resistance and immunity to nonmagical attacks and damage.




All of these examples are not magical so they won't be suppressed, but will still overcome resistance and immunity.



I know this list is not exhaustive, but should be a good starting point.






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    I'm not sure how "counts as magical" means isn't magical for AMF. Ki empowered strikes are specifically covered in this question and guessing the others are also effected in AMF.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The language says, "counts as magical". If it were magic, it would say so. This is also off a JC tweet which are no longer considered as rule. This was never added to the Sage Advice
    $endgroup$
    – MivaScott
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Right, and it says counts as magical...so, magical.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    But sounds like you or Alan Mills should submit a new answer to the ki question.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Medix2 Look at it this way. The Rangers Beast is clearly not magical. It's just a beast with deep ties to the Ranger. But the 7th level ability uses the exact same wording of "count as magical for the purpose of overcoming resistance and immunity to nonmagical attacks and damage". The beast is not magical, their claws (hooves, etc) are not magical, but their attack counts as magical. Why would the other skills use the exact same wording if they are different from the Ranger feature which has no magic? In fact, the only magic mentioned anywhere in the whole skill in during bonding.
    $endgroup$
    – MivaScott
    3 hours ago












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);














draft saved

draft discarded
















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f157139%2fwhat-can-damage-a-lich-in-an-antimagic-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5
















$begingroup$

The lich retains its immunities but can still be damaged



The lich's immunities are not sustained through a magical effect or spell which are what anti-magic field suppresses. They are inherent to the lich and are not mentioned as being "magical".



That said, there are still ways to damage a lich, for example Bludgeoning/Piercing/Slashing damage that is not from an attack. For example, the catapult spell may work (discussed here) or fall damage. Also as user @guildsbounty points out, objects falling onto the lich will also work, perhaps you could make the ceiling collapse. Another method is non-magical elemental damage which is available through various features and items such as alchemists' fire. This answer to the question "Does every damage type have a way to deal nonmagical damage?" shows ways for PC's to have non-magical elemental damage.






share|improve this answer












$endgroup$










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure Catapult would work. If the magical bit goes away when it enters the AMF and the object hits the lich, then you've got non-magical bludgeoning and that immunity.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @nautarch Oh right! That's a great point
    $endgroup$
    – Medix2
    7 hours ago















5
















$begingroup$

The lich retains its immunities but can still be damaged



The lich's immunities are not sustained through a magical effect or spell which are what anti-magic field suppresses. They are inherent to the lich and are not mentioned as being "magical".



That said, there are still ways to damage a lich, for example Bludgeoning/Piercing/Slashing damage that is not from an attack. For example, the catapult spell may work (discussed here) or fall damage. Also as user @guildsbounty points out, objects falling onto the lich will also work, perhaps you could make the ceiling collapse. Another method is non-magical elemental damage which is available through various features and items such as alchemists' fire. This answer to the question "Does every damage type have a way to deal nonmagical damage?" shows ways for PC's to have non-magical elemental damage.






share|improve this answer












$endgroup$










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure Catapult would work. If the magical bit goes away when it enters the AMF and the object hits the lich, then you've got non-magical bludgeoning and that immunity.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @nautarch Oh right! That's a great point
    $endgroup$
    – Medix2
    7 hours ago













5














5










5







$begingroup$

The lich retains its immunities but can still be damaged



The lich's immunities are not sustained through a magical effect or spell which are what anti-magic field suppresses. They are inherent to the lich and are not mentioned as being "magical".



That said, there are still ways to damage a lich, for example Bludgeoning/Piercing/Slashing damage that is not from an attack. For example, the catapult spell may work (discussed here) or fall damage. Also as user @guildsbounty points out, objects falling onto the lich will also work, perhaps you could make the ceiling collapse. Another method is non-magical elemental damage which is available through various features and items such as alchemists' fire. This answer to the question "Does every damage type have a way to deal nonmagical damage?" shows ways for PC's to have non-magical elemental damage.






share|improve this answer












$endgroup$



The lich retains its immunities but can still be damaged



The lich's immunities are not sustained through a magical effect or spell which are what anti-magic field suppresses. They are inherent to the lich and are not mentioned as being "magical".



That said, there are still ways to damage a lich, for example Bludgeoning/Piercing/Slashing damage that is not from an attack. For example, the catapult spell may work (discussed here) or fall damage. Also as user @guildsbounty points out, objects falling onto the lich will also work, perhaps you could make the ceiling collapse. Another method is non-magical elemental damage which is available through various features and items such as alchemists' fire. This answer to the question "Does every damage type have a way to deal nonmagical damage?" shows ways for PC's to have non-magical elemental damage.







share|improve this answer















share|improve this answer




share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 6 hours ago

























answered 8 hours ago









Medix2Medix2

14.3k2 gold badges54 silver badges137 bronze badges




14.3k2 gold badges54 silver badges137 bronze badges










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure Catapult would work. If the magical bit goes away when it enters the AMF and the object hits the lich, then you've got non-magical bludgeoning and that immunity.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @nautarch Oh right! That's a great point
    $endgroup$
    – Medix2
    7 hours ago












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure Catapult would work. If the magical bit goes away when it enters the AMF and the object hits the lich, then you've got non-magical bludgeoning and that immunity.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @nautarch Oh right! That's a great point
    $endgroup$
    – Medix2
    7 hours ago







2




2




$begingroup$
I'm not sure Catapult would work. If the magical bit goes away when it enters the AMF and the object hits the lich, then you've got non-magical bludgeoning and that immunity.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
I'm not sure Catapult would work. If the magical bit goes away when it enters the AMF and the object hits the lich, then you've got non-magical bludgeoning and that immunity.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
7 hours ago












$begingroup$
@nautarch Oh right! That's a great point
$endgroup$
– Medix2
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
@nautarch Oh right! That's a great point
$endgroup$
– Medix2
7 hours ago













2
















$begingroup$

Class abilities and certain items



Alchemist's fire, vials of acid and holy water are all non-magical items which can cause damage the lich does not have immunity to.



Certain classes gain abilities that can allow them to damage a lich even inside of an antimagic field. Some examples:



Monk's at 6th level gain the Ki-Empowered Strikes ability which makes their unarmed strikes count as magical for the purpose of bypassing damage resistance and immunity. This is not actually a magical ability so the AMF won't stop it.



Clerics who have the life domain gain the Divine Strike ability at level 8 which makes their weapon attacks do extra radiant damage.



Paladins gain Improved Divine Smite at level 11 which gives them extra radiant damage on their melee attacks.



Warlocks with the Fiend pact gain Hurl Through Hell at level 14 which can send the lich through the lower planes and make them take psychic damage on their return.






share|improve this answer












$endgroup$










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure how "counts as magical" means isn't magical for AMF. Ki empowered strikes are specifically covered in this question and guessing some others are also effected in AMF.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The language used tells you as much. If Ki empowered strikes were magical it would simply say they are magical. Since it says "counts as magical" it means they are treated as have the benefit of being magical for damage resistance/immunity, but they aren't actually magical.
    $endgroup$
    – Allan Mills
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If it counts as magical, that seems like it's magical.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Both answers to the question "Does ki count as magic for the purpose of an antimagic field, or is it only fluff?" explain that Ki-Empowered Strikes would be suppressed.
    $endgroup$
    – Medix2
    3 hours ago
















2
















$begingroup$

Class abilities and certain items



Alchemist's fire, vials of acid and holy water are all non-magical items which can cause damage the lich does not have immunity to.



Certain classes gain abilities that can allow them to damage a lich even inside of an antimagic field. Some examples:



Monk's at 6th level gain the Ki-Empowered Strikes ability which makes their unarmed strikes count as magical for the purpose of bypassing damage resistance and immunity. This is not actually a magical ability so the AMF won't stop it.



Clerics who have the life domain gain the Divine Strike ability at level 8 which makes their weapon attacks do extra radiant damage.



Paladins gain Improved Divine Smite at level 11 which gives them extra radiant damage on their melee attacks.



Warlocks with the Fiend pact gain Hurl Through Hell at level 14 which can send the lich through the lower planes and make them take psychic damage on their return.






share|improve this answer












$endgroup$










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure how "counts as magical" means isn't magical for AMF. Ki empowered strikes are specifically covered in this question and guessing some others are also effected in AMF.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The language used tells you as much. If Ki empowered strikes were magical it would simply say they are magical. Since it says "counts as magical" it means they are treated as have the benefit of being magical for damage resistance/immunity, but they aren't actually magical.
    $endgroup$
    – Allan Mills
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If it counts as magical, that seems like it's magical.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Both answers to the question "Does ki count as magic for the purpose of an antimagic field, or is it only fluff?" explain that Ki-Empowered Strikes would be suppressed.
    $endgroup$
    – Medix2
    3 hours ago














2














2










2







$begingroup$

Class abilities and certain items



Alchemist's fire, vials of acid and holy water are all non-magical items which can cause damage the lich does not have immunity to.



Certain classes gain abilities that can allow them to damage a lich even inside of an antimagic field. Some examples:



Monk's at 6th level gain the Ki-Empowered Strikes ability which makes their unarmed strikes count as magical for the purpose of bypassing damage resistance and immunity. This is not actually a magical ability so the AMF won't stop it.



Clerics who have the life domain gain the Divine Strike ability at level 8 which makes their weapon attacks do extra radiant damage.



Paladins gain Improved Divine Smite at level 11 which gives them extra radiant damage on their melee attacks.



Warlocks with the Fiend pact gain Hurl Through Hell at level 14 which can send the lich through the lower planes and make them take psychic damage on their return.






share|improve this answer












$endgroup$



Class abilities and certain items



Alchemist's fire, vials of acid and holy water are all non-magical items which can cause damage the lich does not have immunity to.



Certain classes gain abilities that can allow them to damage a lich even inside of an antimagic field. Some examples:



Monk's at 6th level gain the Ki-Empowered Strikes ability which makes their unarmed strikes count as magical for the purpose of bypassing damage resistance and immunity. This is not actually a magical ability so the AMF won't stop it.



Clerics who have the life domain gain the Divine Strike ability at level 8 which makes their weapon attacks do extra radiant damage.



Paladins gain Improved Divine Smite at level 11 which gives them extra radiant damage on their melee attacks.



Warlocks with the Fiend pact gain Hurl Through Hell at level 14 which can send the lich through the lower planes and make them take psychic damage on their return.







share|improve this answer















share|improve this answer




share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 4 hours ago

























answered 4 hours ago









Allan MillsAllan Mills

7,0891 gold badge10 silver badges48 bronze badges




7,0891 gold badge10 silver badges48 bronze badges










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure how "counts as magical" means isn't magical for AMF. Ki empowered strikes are specifically covered in this question and guessing some others are also effected in AMF.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The language used tells you as much. If Ki empowered strikes were magical it would simply say they are magical. Since it says "counts as magical" it means they are treated as have the benefit of being magical for damage resistance/immunity, but they aren't actually magical.
    $endgroup$
    – Allan Mills
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If it counts as magical, that seems like it's magical.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Both answers to the question "Does ki count as magic for the purpose of an antimagic field, or is it only fluff?" explain that Ki-Empowered Strikes would be suppressed.
    $endgroup$
    – Medix2
    3 hours ago













  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure how "counts as magical" means isn't magical for AMF. Ki empowered strikes are specifically covered in this question and guessing some others are also effected in AMF.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The language used tells you as much. If Ki empowered strikes were magical it would simply say they are magical. Since it says "counts as magical" it means they are treated as have the benefit of being magical for damage resistance/immunity, but they aren't actually magical.
    $endgroup$
    – Allan Mills
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If it counts as magical, that seems like it's magical.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Both answers to the question "Does ki count as magic for the purpose of an antimagic field, or is it only fluff?" explain that Ki-Empowered Strikes would be suppressed.
    $endgroup$
    – Medix2
    3 hours ago








1




1




$begingroup$
I'm not sure how "counts as magical" means isn't magical for AMF. Ki empowered strikes are specifically covered in this question and guessing some others are also effected in AMF.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
I'm not sure how "counts as magical" means isn't magical for AMF. Ki empowered strikes are specifically covered in this question and guessing some others are also effected in AMF.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
The language used tells you as much. If Ki empowered strikes were magical it would simply say they are magical. Since it says "counts as magical" it means they are treated as have the benefit of being magical for damage resistance/immunity, but they aren't actually magical.
$endgroup$
– Allan Mills
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
The language used tells you as much. If Ki empowered strikes were magical it would simply say they are magical. Since it says "counts as magical" it means they are treated as have the benefit of being magical for damage resistance/immunity, but they aren't actually magical.
$endgroup$
– Allan Mills
4 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
If it counts as magical, that seems like it's magical.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
If it counts as magical, that seems like it's magical.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
3 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Both answers to the question "Does ki count as magic for the purpose of an antimagic field, or is it only fluff?" explain that Ki-Empowered Strikes would be suppressed.
$endgroup$
– Medix2
3 hours ago





$begingroup$
Both answers to the question "Does ki count as magic for the purpose of an antimagic field, or is it only fluff?" explain that Ki-Empowered Strikes would be suppressed.
$endgroup$
– Medix2
3 hours ago












0
















$begingroup$

There are a few skills/class features that should still work



For instance, a 6th level monk gets "Ki-Empowered Strikes" which:




Starting at 6th level, your unarmed strikes count as magical for the purpose of overcoming resistance and immunity to nonmagical attacks and damage.




Similarly, the Warlock's Pact of the Blade:




You can use your action to create a pact weapon in your empty hand. You can choose the form that this melee weapon takes each time you create it (see chapter 5 for weapon options). You are proficient with it while you wield it. This weapon counts as magical for the purpose of overcoming resistance and immunity to nonmagical attacks and damage.




Even the lowly Beast Master Ranger, at 7th level gains Exceptional Training:




Beginning at 7th level, on any of your turns when your beast companion doesn't attack, you can use a bonus action to command the beast to take the Dash, Disengage, or Help action on its turn. In addition, the beast's attacks now count as magical for the purpose of overcoming resistance and immunity to nonmagical attacks and damage.




All of these examples are not magical so they won't be suppressed, but will still overcome resistance and immunity.



I know this list is not exhaustive, but should be a good starting point.






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    I'm not sure how "counts as magical" means isn't magical for AMF. Ki empowered strikes are specifically covered in this question and guessing the others are also effected in AMF.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The language says, "counts as magical". If it were magic, it would say so. This is also off a JC tweet which are no longer considered as rule. This was never added to the Sage Advice
    $endgroup$
    – MivaScott
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Right, and it says counts as magical...so, magical.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    But sounds like you or Alan Mills should submit a new answer to the ki question.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Medix2 Look at it this way. The Rangers Beast is clearly not magical. It's just a beast with deep ties to the Ranger. But the 7th level ability uses the exact same wording of "count as magical for the purpose of overcoming resistance and immunity to nonmagical attacks and damage". The beast is not magical, their claws (hooves, etc) are not magical, but their attack counts as magical. Why would the other skills use the exact same wording if they are different from the Ranger feature which has no magic? In fact, the only magic mentioned anywhere in the whole skill in during bonding.
    $endgroup$
    – MivaScott
    3 hours ago















0
















$begingroup$

There are a few skills/class features that should still work



For instance, a 6th level monk gets "Ki-Empowered Strikes" which:




Starting at 6th level, your unarmed strikes count as magical for the purpose of overcoming resistance and immunity to nonmagical attacks and damage.




Similarly, the Warlock's Pact of the Blade:




You can use your action to create a pact weapon in your empty hand. You can choose the form that this melee weapon takes each time you create it (see chapter 5 for weapon options). You are proficient with it while you wield it. This weapon counts as magical for the purpose of overcoming resistance and immunity to nonmagical attacks and damage.




Even the lowly Beast Master Ranger, at 7th level gains Exceptional Training:




Beginning at 7th level, on any of your turns when your beast companion doesn't attack, you can use a bonus action to command the beast to take the Dash, Disengage, or Help action on its turn. In addition, the beast's attacks now count as magical for the purpose of overcoming resistance and immunity to nonmagical attacks and damage.




All of these examples are not magical so they won't be suppressed, but will still overcome resistance and immunity.



I know this list is not exhaustive, but should be a good starting point.






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    I'm not sure how "counts as magical" means isn't magical for AMF. Ki empowered strikes are specifically covered in this question and guessing the others are also effected in AMF.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The language says, "counts as magical". If it were magic, it would say so. This is also off a JC tweet which are no longer considered as rule. This was never added to the Sage Advice
    $endgroup$
    – MivaScott
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Right, and it says counts as magical...so, magical.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    But sounds like you or Alan Mills should submit a new answer to the ki question.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Medix2 Look at it this way. The Rangers Beast is clearly not magical. It's just a beast with deep ties to the Ranger. But the 7th level ability uses the exact same wording of "count as magical for the purpose of overcoming resistance and immunity to nonmagical attacks and damage". The beast is not magical, their claws (hooves, etc) are not magical, but their attack counts as magical. Why would the other skills use the exact same wording if they are different from the Ranger feature which has no magic? In fact, the only magic mentioned anywhere in the whole skill in during bonding.
    $endgroup$
    – MivaScott
    3 hours ago













0














0










0







$begingroup$

There are a few skills/class features that should still work



For instance, a 6th level monk gets "Ki-Empowered Strikes" which:




Starting at 6th level, your unarmed strikes count as magical for the purpose of overcoming resistance and immunity to nonmagical attacks and damage.




Similarly, the Warlock's Pact of the Blade:




You can use your action to create a pact weapon in your empty hand. You can choose the form that this melee weapon takes each time you create it (see chapter 5 for weapon options). You are proficient with it while you wield it. This weapon counts as magical for the purpose of overcoming resistance and immunity to nonmagical attacks and damage.




Even the lowly Beast Master Ranger, at 7th level gains Exceptional Training:




Beginning at 7th level, on any of your turns when your beast companion doesn't attack, you can use a bonus action to command the beast to take the Dash, Disengage, or Help action on its turn. In addition, the beast's attacks now count as magical for the purpose of overcoming resistance and immunity to nonmagical attacks and damage.




All of these examples are not magical so they won't be suppressed, but will still overcome resistance and immunity.



I know this list is not exhaustive, but should be a good starting point.






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$



There are a few skills/class features that should still work



For instance, a 6th level monk gets "Ki-Empowered Strikes" which:




Starting at 6th level, your unarmed strikes count as magical for the purpose of overcoming resistance and immunity to nonmagical attacks and damage.




Similarly, the Warlock's Pact of the Blade:




You can use your action to create a pact weapon in your empty hand. You can choose the form that this melee weapon takes each time you create it (see chapter 5 for weapon options). You are proficient with it while you wield it. This weapon counts as magical for the purpose of overcoming resistance and immunity to nonmagical attacks and damage.




Even the lowly Beast Master Ranger, at 7th level gains Exceptional Training:




Beginning at 7th level, on any of your turns when your beast companion doesn't attack, you can use a bonus action to command the beast to take the Dash, Disengage, or Help action on its turn. In addition, the beast's attacks now count as magical for the purpose of overcoming resistance and immunity to nonmagical attacks and damage.




All of these examples are not magical so they won't be suppressed, but will still overcome resistance and immunity.



I know this list is not exhaustive, but should be a good starting point.







share|improve this answer













share|improve this answer




share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 4 hours ago









MivaScottMivaScott

7,9371 gold badge23 silver badges57 bronze badges




7,9371 gold badge23 silver badges57 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    I'm not sure how "counts as magical" means isn't magical for AMF. Ki empowered strikes are specifically covered in this question and guessing the others are also effected in AMF.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The language says, "counts as magical". If it were magic, it would say so. This is also off a JC tweet which are no longer considered as rule. This was never added to the Sage Advice
    $endgroup$
    – MivaScott
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Right, and it says counts as magical...so, magical.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    But sounds like you or Alan Mills should submit a new answer to the ki question.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Medix2 Look at it this way. The Rangers Beast is clearly not magical. It's just a beast with deep ties to the Ranger. But the 7th level ability uses the exact same wording of "count as magical for the purpose of overcoming resistance and immunity to nonmagical attacks and damage". The beast is not magical, their claws (hooves, etc) are not magical, but their attack counts as magical. Why would the other skills use the exact same wording if they are different from the Ranger feature which has no magic? In fact, the only magic mentioned anywhere in the whole skill in during bonding.
    $endgroup$
    – MivaScott
    3 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    I'm not sure how "counts as magical" means isn't magical for AMF. Ki empowered strikes are specifically covered in this question and guessing the others are also effected in AMF.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The language says, "counts as magical". If it were magic, it would say so. This is also off a JC tweet which are no longer considered as rule. This was never added to the Sage Advice
    $endgroup$
    – MivaScott
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Right, and it says counts as magical...so, magical.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    But sounds like you or Alan Mills should submit a new answer to the ki question.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Medix2 Look at it this way. The Rangers Beast is clearly not magical. It's just a beast with deep ties to the Ranger. But the 7th level ability uses the exact same wording of "count as magical for the purpose of overcoming resistance and immunity to nonmagical attacks and damage". The beast is not magical, their claws (hooves, etc) are not magical, but their attack counts as magical. Why would the other skills use the exact same wording if they are different from the Ranger feature which has no magic? In fact, the only magic mentioned anywhere in the whole skill in during bonding.
    $endgroup$
    – MivaScott
    3 hours ago















$begingroup$
I'm not sure how "counts as magical" means isn't magical for AMF. Ki empowered strikes are specifically covered in this question and guessing the others are also effected in AMF.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
I'm not sure how "counts as magical" means isn't magical for AMF. Ki empowered strikes are specifically covered in this question and guessing the others are also effected in AMF.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
The language says, "counts as magical". If it were magic, it would say so. This is also off a JC tweet which are no longer considered as rule. This was never added to the Sage Advice
$endgroup$
– MivaScott
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
The language says, "counts as magical". If it were magic, it would say so. This is also off a JC tweet which are no longer considered as rule. This was never added to the Sage Advice
$endgroup$
– MivaScott
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
Right, and it says counts as magical...so, magical.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
Right, and it says counts as magical...so, magical.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
3 hours ago












$begingroup$
But sounds like you or Alan Mills should submit a new answer to the ki question.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
But sounds like you or Alan Mills should submit a new answer to the ki question.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
3 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@Medix2 Look at it this way. The Rangers Beast is clearly not magical. It's just a beast with deep ties to the Ranger. But the 7th level ability uses the exact same wording of "count as magical for the purpose of overcoming resistance and immunity to nonmagical attacks and damage". The beast is not magical, their claws (hooves, etc) are not magical, but their attack counts as magical. Why would the other skills use the exact same wording if they are different from the Ranger feature which has no magic? In fact, the only magic mentioned anywhere in the whole skill in during bonding.
$endgroup$
– MivaScott
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
@Medix2 Look at it this way. The Rangers Beast is clearly not magical. It's just a beast with deep ties to the Ranger. But the 7th level ability uses the exact same wording of "count as magical for the purpose of overcoming resistance and immunity to nonmagical attacks and damage". The beast is not magical, their claws (hooves, etc) are not magical, but their attack counts as magical. Why would the other skills use the exact same wording if they are different from the Ranger feature which has no magic? In fact, the only magic mentioned anywhere in the whole skill in during bonding.
$endgroup$
– MivaScott
3 hours ago


















draft saved

draft discarded















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f157139%2fwhat-can-damage-a-lich-in-an-antimagic-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

199年 目錄 大件事 到箇年出世嗰人 到箇年死嗰人 節慶、風俗習慣 導覽選單