Word for an event that will likely never happen againWhat word is used to describe an event that will never occur?A single word for “Someone who cannot say no to anyone asking for help.”Is there a term for an anniversary that falls on the same day of the week as its original date?A word or phrase for an unremarkable event that occurs with uncanny frequencyA word or phrase to describe quick thinking in the momentIs there a real word that means “pre-enact”?A word for making an event more likely or less likelyWhat's a word for when someone is drawing out a story for dramatic effect?

What is my malfunctioning AI harvesting from humans?

Super Duper Vdd stiffening required on 555 timer, what is the best way?

Why did Gandalf use a sword against the Balrog?

Is it feasible to get a hash collision for CRC32, MD-5 and SHA-1 on one file?

How do some PhD students get 10+ papers? Is that what I need for landing good faculty position?

Is there any way to stop a user from creating executables and running them?

How to take the beginning and end parts of a list with simpler syntax?

What gave Harry Potter the idea of writing in Tom Riddle's diary?

Submitting a new paper just after another was accepted by the same journal

Is this n-speak?

Redis Cache Shared Session Configuration

Can "être sur" mean "to be about" ?

0xF1 opcode-prefix on i80286

How are you supposed to know the strumming pattern for a song from the "chord sheet music"?

Why are Gatwick's runways too close together?

A torrent of foreign terms

Why aren't rainbows blurred-out into nothing after they are produced?

Solution to German Tank Problem

When does Tiana, Ship's Caretaker check card type?

Do I have to cite common CS algorithms?

How much maintenance time did it take to make an F4U Corsair ready for another flight?

is this F 6'9 chord a figured bass or a chord extension?

Loading military units into ships optimally, using backtracking

Are differences between uniformly distributed numbers uniformly distributed?



Word for an event that will likely never happen again


What word is used to describe an event that will never occur?A single word for “Someone who cannot say no to anyone asking for help.”Is there a term for an anniversary that falls on the same day of the week as its original date?A word or phrase for an unremarkable event that occurs with uncanny frequencyA word or phrase to describe quick thinking in the momentIs there a real word that means “pre-enact”?A word for making an event more likely or less likelyWhat's a word for when someone is drawing out a story for dramatic effect?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1















I've read this question, but none of them are what I am looking for. I once read a book that used a word to describe an event that has happened in the past, but the odds were so astronomical that it will likely never happen a second time. The context I read these words in were the creation of the first life on earth (without any theological ideas). Basically, the text said that the scenario for the creation of the first living organism happened on a planet where conditions were just right by complete chance, and that the odds of this were so astronomical that it would likely never happen again anywhere in the universe over any length of time.



Sample sentence: "The creation of the first organisms were incredibly unlikely, the event can be called a ______ event, or an event that will likely never happen again."



I can't pretend to understand the validity of the claims by the text, but the words they used to describe these events were quite clever (and scientific sounding) that it would make a fun hyperbole.



I thought it was something along the lines of singularity event, but that doesn't sound quite right.










share|improve this question









New contributor



Thaddeus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1





    Unique would work.

    – Xanne
    7 hours ago











  • I don’t think it perfectly fits in this context, but anomaly might work in others

    – gen-z ready to perish
    4 hours ago











  • A black swan?

    – John Lawler
    3 hours ago

















1















I've read this question, but none of them are what I am looking for. I once read a book that used a word to describe an event that has happened in the past, but the odds were so astronomical that it will likely never happen a second time. The context I read these words in were the creation of the first life on earth (without any theological ideas). Basically, the text said that the scenario for the creation of the first living organism happened on a planet where conditions were just right by complete chance, and that the odds of this were so astronomical that it would likely never happen again anywhere in the universe over any length of time.



Sample sentence: "The creation of the first organisms were incredibly unlikely, the event can be called a ______ event, or an event that will likely never happen again."



I can't pretend to understand the validity of the claims by the text, but the words they used to describe these events were quite clever (and scientific sounding) that it would make a fun hyperbole.



I thought it was something along the lines of singularity event, but that doesn't sound quite right.










share|improve this question









New contributor



Thaddeus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1





    Unique would work.

    – Xanne
    7 hours ago











  • I don’t think it perfectly fits in this context, but anomaly might work in others

    – gen-z ready to perish
    4 hours ago











  • A black swan?

    – John Lawler
    3 hours ago













1












1








1








I've read this question, but none of them are what I am looking for. I once read a book that used a word to describe an event that has happened in the past, but the odds were so astronomical that it will likely never happen a second time. The context I read these words in were the creation of the first life on earth (without any theological ideas). Basically, the text said that the scenario for the creation of the first living organism happened on a planet where conditions were just right by complete chance, and that the odds of this were so astronomical that it would likely never happen again anywhere in the universe over any length of time.



Sample sentence: "The creation of the first organisms were incredibly unlikely, the event can be called a ______ event, or an event that will likely never happen again."



I can't pretend to understand the validity of the claims by the text, but the words they used to describe these events were quite clever (and scientific sounding) that it would make a fun hyperbole.



I thought it was something along the lines of singularity event, but that doesn't sound quite right.










share|improve this question









New contributor



Thaddeus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I've read this question, but none of them are what I am looking for. I once read a book that used a word to describe an event that has happened in the past, but the odds were so astronomical that it will likely never happen a second time. The context I read these words in were the creation of the first life on earth (without any theological ideas). Basically, the text said that the scenario for the creation of the first living organism happened on a planet where conditions were just right by complete chance, and that the odds of this were so astronomical that it would likely never happen again anywhere in the universe over any length of time.



Sample sentence: "The creation of the first organisms were incredibly unlikely, the event can be called a ______ event, or an event that will likely never happen again."



I can't pretend to understand the validity of the claims by the text, but the words they used to describe these events were quite clever (and scientific sounding) that it would make a fun hyperbole.



I thought it was something along the lines of singularity event, but that doesn't sound quite right.







single-word-requests






share|improve this question









New contributor



Thaddeus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



Thaddeus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 8 hours ago









Glorfindel

10.9k12 gold badges48 silver badges47 bronze badges




10.9k12 gold badges48 silver badges47 bronze badges






New contributor



Thaddeus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 8 hours ago









ThaddeusThaddeus

61 bronze badge




61 bronze badge




New contributor



Thaddeus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




Thaddeus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • 1





    Unique would work.

    – Xanne
    7 hours ago











  • I don’t think it perfectly fits in this context, but anomaly might work in others

    – gen-z ready to perish
    4 hours ago











  • A black swan?

    – John Lawler
    3 hours ago












  • 1





    Unique would work.

    – Xanne
    7 hours ago











  • I don’t think it perfectly fits in this context, but anomaly might work in others

    – gen-z ready to perish
    4 hours ago











  • A black swan?

    – John Lawler
    3 hours ago







1




1





Unique would work.

– Xanne
7 hours ago





Unique would work.

– Xanne
7 hours ago













I don’t think it perfectly fits in this context, but anomaly might work in others

– gen-z ready to perish
4 hours ago





I don’t think it perfectly fits in this context, but anomaly might work in others

– gen-z ready to perish
4 hours ago













A black swan?

– John Lawler
3 hours ago





A black swan?

– John Lawler
3 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















3














The Century Dictionary and Cyclopedia defines Singular as meaning:




  1. Out of the usual course; unusual, uncomon; somewhat strange; a little extraordinary: As a singlular phenomena




More literally it derives from single, meaning one, so a singular phenomena is logistically something that is assessed as happening just once. It is of course possible to use the term hyperbolicly or mistakenly, which can diminish the effect, but I doubt you will find any word that lacks that particular problem. The nature of hyperbole is that people tend to exaggerate, and sometimes intentionally, so they will choose whichever word most effectively achieves the exaggeration they want to convey.



Since the dictionary entry was written, Singular Event actually overtook singular phenomena in popularity as shown by google Ngrams, and collins shows that singular is one of the top 10,000 words used in the language, so I figure that this demonstrates that it is more than common and easily enough understood.



This chart demonstrates the popularity of singular event vs singular phenomena. Both were very popular in the 1820s but declined usage until the 1940s, but afterwards singular event began to rise in popularity again while phenomona remained stable, making Singular event the more popular form by a few times over.



An example of relevant usage used in a context regarding the unlikely creation of life can be found on page 3 of Free Radicals: Biology and Detection by Spinn Trapping et al (1999):




This biblical account of creation [referring to an excluded quotation of Genesis 1:1–7], a theme common to the cultural life of many societies over the past several millennia (westerman, 1974, fortells the birth of life on our planet. From the available evidence we have today, this epic began about 15 billion years ago, when, we are told, a massive explosion of incomprehensible power, referred to as "The Big Bang," created everything that was, is, and will be (Hawking, 1088; Peebles et al., 1994). From this singular event, the evolution of life commenced with the formation of hydrogen and, to a lesser extent, helium.





Regarding singularity event❌, the reason that does not work is because the -ity suffix functions to change the adjective into a noun, as noted by the entry for -ity:




A common termination of nouns of Latin origin or formed after Latin analogy, from adjectives, properly from adjectives of latin origin or type, as in *activity, civility, suavity etc., but also in some words from adjectives not from latin origin or type, as in jollity. The suffix is properly -ty, the preceeding vowel belonging originally to the adjective. See -ty2.




Sometimes adjoined nouns do modify nouns, but much more rarely than adjectives and in a very different manner.






share|improve this answer


































    2















    The creation of the first organisms were incredibly unlikely, the event can be called a one-off event, or an event that will likely never happen again.




    Merriam Webster defines it as




    limited to a single time, occasion, or instance




    A witty alternative would be once in a lifetime but I find it rather confusing in this context. It might work for shorter timescales, though.






    share|improve this answer

























    • That is probably the word the text should have used, as that is the sole purpose of the word, but the reason I remembered reading this text was because I asked myself "Why didn't the author use one-off?" Although for anyone reading the question, one-off is definitely the word that should be used.

      – Thaddeus
      8 hours ago











    • The word I am looking for has a more scientific connotation behind it.

      – Thaddeus
      8 hours ago


















    0














    Unique.



    Unique means ‘singular, or only happening once.’



    It is from the word one - etymology - ‘early 17th century: from French, from Latin unicus, from unus ‘one’.’



    A unique event. One that happens only once.



    Unique has also been broadened to mean ‘unusual or rare’ but then, things that only happen once, generally are that.



    https://www.thefreedictionary.com/unique






    share|improve this answer



























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "97"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );






      Thaddeus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f508125%2fword-for-an-event-that-will-likely-never-happen-again%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3














      The Century Dictionary and Cyclopedia defines Singular as meaning:




      1. Out of the usual course; unusual, uncomon; somewhat strange; a little extraordinary: As a singlular phenomena




      More literally it derives from single, meaning one, so a singular phenomena is logistically something that is assessed as happening just once. It is of course possible to use the term hyperbolicly or mistakenly, which can diminish the effect, but I doubt you will find any word that lacks that particular problem. The nature of hyperbole is that people tend to exaggerate, and sometimes intentionally, so they will choose whichever word most effectively achieves the exaggeration they want to convey.



      Since the dictionary entry was written, Singular Event actually overtook singular phenomena in popularity as shown by google Ngrams, and collins shows that singular is one of the top 10,000 words used in the language, so I figure that this demonstrates that it is more than common and easily enough understood.



      This chart demonstrates the popularity of singular event vs singular phenomena. Both were very popular in the 1820s but declined usage until the 1940s, but afterwards singular event began to rise in popularity again while phenomona remained stable, making Singular event the more popular form by a few times over.



      An example of relevant usage used in a context regarding the unlikely creation of life can be found on page 3 of Free Radicals: Biology and Detection by Spinn Trapping et al (1999):




      This biblical account of creation [referring to an excluded quotation of Genesis 1:1–7], a theme common to the cultural life of many societies over the past several millennia (westerman, 1974, fortells the birth of life on our planet. From the available evidence we have today, this epic began about 15 billion years ago, when, we are told, a massive explosion of incomprehensible power, referred to as "The Big Bang," created everything that was, is, and will be (Hawking, 1088; Peebles et al., 1994). From this singular event, the evolution of life commenced with the formation of hydrogen and, to a lesser extent, helium.





      Regarding singularity event❌, the reason that does not work is because the -ity suffix functions to change the adjective into a noun, as noted by the entry for -ity:




      A common termination of nouns of Latin origin or formed after Latin analogy, from adjectives, properly from adjectives of latin origin or type, as in *activity, civility, suavity etc., but also in some words from adjectives not from latin origin or type, as in jollity. The suffix is properly -ty, the preceeding vowel belonging originally to the adjective. See -ty2.




      Sometimes adjoined nouns do modify nouns, but much more rarely than adjectives and in a very different manner.






      share|improve this answer































        3














        The Century Dictionary and Cyclopedia defines Singular as meaning:




        1. Out of the usual course; unusual, uncomon; somewhat strange; a little extraordinary: As a singlular phenomena




        More literally it derives from single, meaning one, so a singular phenomena is logistically something that is assessed as happening just once. It is of course possible to use the term hyperbolicly or mistakenly, which can diminish the effect, but I doubt you will find any word that lacks that particular problem. The nature of hyperbole is that people tend to exaggerate, and sometimes intentionally, so they will choose whichever word most effectively achieves the exaggeration they want to convey.



        Since the dictionary entry was written, Singular Event actually overtook singular phenomena in popularity as shown by google Ngrams, and collins shows that singular is one of the top 10,000 words used in the language, so I figure that this demonstrates that it is more than common and easily enough understood.



        This chart demonstrates the popularity of singular event vs singular phenomena. Both were very popular in the 1820s but declined usage until the 1940s, but afterwards singular event began to rise in popularity again while phenomona remained stable, making Singular event the more popular form by a few times over.



        An example of relevant usage used in a context regarding the unlikely creation of life can be found on page 3 of Free Radicals: Biology and Detection by Spinn Trapping et al (1999):




        This biblical account of creation [referring to an excluded quotation of Genesis 1:1–7], a theme common to the cultural life of many societies over the past several millennia (westerman, 1974, fortells the birth of life on our planet. From the available evidence we have today, this epic began about 15 billion years ago, when, we are told, a massive explosion of incomprehensible power, referred to as "The Big Bang," created everything that was, is, and will be (Hawking, 1088; Peebles et al., 1994). From this singular event, the evolution of life commenced with the formation of hydrogen and, to a lesser extent, helium.





        Regarding singularity event❌, the reason that does not work is because the -ity suffix functions to change the adjective into a noun, as noted by the entry for -ity:




        A common termination of nouns of Latin origin or formed after Latin analogy, from adjectives, properly from adjectives of latin origin or type, as in *activity, civility, suavity etc., but also in some words from adjectives not from latin origin or type, as in jollity. The suffix is properly -ty, the preceeding vowel belonging originally to the adjective. See -ty2.




        Sometimes adjoined nouns do modify nouns, but much more rarely than adjectives and in a very different manner.






        share|improve this answer





























          3












          3








          3







          The Century Dictionary and Cyclopedia defines Singular as meaning:




          1. Out of the usual course; unusual, uncomon; somewhat strange; a little extraordinary: As a singlular phenomena




          More literally it derives from single, meaning one, so a singular phenomena is logistically something that is assessed as happening just once. It is of course possible to use the term hyperbolicly or mistakenly, which can diminish the effect, but I doubt you will find any word that lacks that particular problem. The nature of hyperbole is that people tend to exaggerate, and sometimes intentionally, so they will choose whichever word most effectively achieves the exaggeration they want to convey.



          Since the dictionary entry was written, Singular Event actually overtook singular phenomena in popularity as shown by google Ngrams, and collins shows that singular is one of the top 10,000 words used in the language, so I figure that this demonstrates that it is more than common and easily enough understood.



          This chart demonstrates the popularity of singular event vs singular phenomena. Both were very popular in the 1820s but declined usage until the 1940s, but afterwards singular event began to rise in popularity again while phenomona remained stable, making Singular event the more popular form by a few times over.



          An example of relevant usage used in a context regarding the unlikely creation of life can be found on page 3 of Free Radicals: Biology and Detection by Spinn Trapping et al (1999):




          This biblical account of creation [referring to an excluded quotation of Genesis 1:1–7], a theme common to the cultural life of many societies over the past several millennia (westerman, 1974, fortells the birth of life on our planet. From the available evidence we have today, this epic began about 15 billion years ago, when, we are told, a massive explosion of incomprehensible power, referred to as "The Big Bang," created everything that was, is, and will be (Hawking, 1088; Peebles et al., 1994). From this singular event, the evolution of life commenced with the formation of hydrogen and, to a lesser extent, helium.





          Regarding singularity event❌, the reason that does not work is because the -ity suffix functions to change the adjective into a noun, as noted by the entry for -ity:




          A common termination of nouns of Latin origin or formed after Latin analogy, from adjectives, properly from adjectives of latin origin or type, as in *activity, civility, suavity etc., but also in some words from adjectives not from latin origin or type, as in jollity. The suffix is properly -ty, the preceeding vowel belonging originally to the adjective. See -ty2.




          Sometimes adjoined nouns do modify nouns, but much more rarely than adjectives and in a very different manner.






          share|improve this answer















          The Century Dictionary and Cyclopedia defines Singular as meaning:




          1. Out of the usual course; unusual, uncomon; somewhat strange; a little extraordinary: As a singlular phenomena




          More literally it derives from single, meaning one, so a singular phenomena is logistically something that is assessed as happening just once. It is of course possible to use the term hyperbolicly or mistakenly, which can diminish the effect, but I doubt you will find any word that lacks that particular problem. The nature of hyperbole is that people tend to exaggerate, and sometimes intentionally, so they will choose whichever word most effectively achieves the exaggeration they want to convey.



          Since the dictionary entry was written, Singular Event actually overtook singular phenomena in popularity as shown by google Ngrams, and collins shows that singular is one of the top 10,000 words used in the language, so I figure that this demonstrates that it is more than common and easily enough understood.



          This chart demonstrates the popularity of singular event vs singular phenomena. Both were very popular in the 1820s but declined usage until the 1940s, but afterwards singular event began to rise in popularity again while phenomona remained stable, making Singular event the more popular form by a few times over.



          An example of relevant usage used in a context regarding the unlikely creation of life can be found on page 3 of Free Radicals: Biology and Detection by Spinn Trapping et al (1999):




          This biblical account of creation [referring to an excluded quotation of Genesis 1:1–7], a theme common to the cultural life of many societies over the past several millennia (westerman, 1974, fortells the birth of life on our planet. From the available evidence we have today, this epic began about 15 billion years ago, when, we are told, a massive explosion of incomprehensible power, referred to as "The Big Bang," created everything that was, is, and will be (Hawking, 1088; Peebles et al., 1994). From this singular event, the evolution of life commenced with the formation of hydrogen and, to a lesser extent, helium.





          Regarding singularity event❌, the reason that does not work is because the -ity suffix functions to change the adjective into a noun, as noted by the entry for -ity:




          A common termination of nouns of Latin origin or formed after Latin analogy, from adjectives, properly from adjectives of latin origin or type, as in *activity, civility, suavity etc., but also in some words from adjectives not from latin origin or type, as in jollity. The suffix is properly -ty, the preceeding vowel belonging originally to the adjective. See -ty2.




          Sometimes adjoined nouns do modify nouns, but much more rarely than adjectives and in a very different manner.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 6 hours ago

























          answered 7 hours ago









          TonepoetTonepoet

          3,9331 gold badge16 silver badges29 bronze badges




          3,9331 gold badge16 silver badges29 bronze badges


























              2















              The creation of the first organisms were incredibly unlikely, the event can be called a one-off event, or an event that will likely never happen again.




              Merriam Webster defines it as




              limited to a single time, occasion, or instance




              A witty alternative would be once in a lifetime but I find it rather confusing in this context. It might work for shorter timescales, though.






              share|improve this answer

























              • That is probably the word the text should have used, as that is the sole purpose of the word, but the reason I remembered reading this text was because I asked myself "Why didn't the author use one-off?" Although for anyone reading the question, one-off is definitely the word that should be used.

                – Thaddeus
                8 hours ago











              • The word I am looking for has a more scientific connotation behind it.

                – Thaddeus
                8 hours ago















              2















              The creation of the first organisms were incredibly unlikely, the event can be called a one-off event, or an event that will likely never happen again.




              Merriam Webster defines it as




              limited to a single time, occasion, or instance




              A witty alternative would be once in a lifetime but I find it rather confusing in this context. It might work for shorter timescales, though.






              share|improve this answer

























              • That is probably the word the text should have used, as that is the sole purpose of the word, but the reason I remembered reading this text was because I asked myself "Why didn't the author use one-off?" Although for anyone reading the question, one-off is definitely the word that should be used.

                – Thaddeus
                8 hours ago











              • The word I am looking for has a more scientific connotation behind it.

                – Thaddeus
                8 hours ago













              2












              2








              2








              The creation of the first organisms were incredibly unlikely, the event can be called a one-off event, or an event that will likely never happen again.




              Merriam Webster defines it as




              limited to a single time, occasion, or instance




              A witty alternative would be once in a lifetime but I find it rather confusing in this context. It might work for shorter timescales, though.






              share|improve this answer














              The creation of the first organisms were incredibly unlikely, the event can be called a one-off event, or an event that will likely never happen again.




              Merriam Webster defines it as




              limited to a single time, occasion, or instance




              A witty alternative would be once in a lifetime but I find it rather confusing in this context. It might work for shorter timescales, though.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 8 hours ago









              GlorfindelGlorfindel

              10.9k12 gold badges48 silver badges47 bronze badges




              10.9k12 gold badges48 silver badges47 bronze badges















              • That is probably the word the text should have used, as that is the sole purpose of the word, but the reason I remembered reading this text was because I asked myself "Why didn't the author use one-off?" Although for anyone reading the question, one-off is definitely the word that should be used.

                – Thaddeus
                8 hours ago











              • The word I am looking for has a more scientific connotation behind it.

                – Thaddeus
                8 hours ago

















              • That is probably the word the text should have used, as that is the sole purpose of the word, but the reason I remembered reading this text was because I asked myself "Why didn't the author use one-off?" Although for anyone reading the question, one-off is definitely the word that should be used.

                – Thaddeus
                8 hours ago











              • The word I am looking for has a more scientific connotation behind it.

                – Thaddeus
                8 hours ago
















              That is probably the word the text should have used, as that is the sole purpose of the word, but the reason I remembered reading this text was because I asked myself "Why didn't the author use one-off?" Although for anyone reading the question, one-off is definitely the word that should be used.

              – Thaddeus
              8 hours ago





              That is probably the word the text should have used, as that is the sole purpose of the word, but the reason I remembered reading this text was because I asked myself "Why didn't the author use one-off?" Although for anyone reading the question, one-off is definitely the word that should be used.

              – Thaddeus
              8 hours ago













              The word I am looking for has a more scientific connotation behind it.

              – Thaddeus
              8 hours ago





              The word I am looking for has a more scientific connotation behind it.

              – Thaddeus
              8 hours ago











              0














              Unique.



              Unique means ‘singular, or only happening once.’



              It is from the word one - etymology - ‘early 17th century: from French, from Latin unicus, from unus ‘one’.’



              A unique event. One that happens only once.



              Unique has also been broadened to mean ‘unusual or rare’ but then, things that only happen once, generally are that.



              https://www.thefreedictionary.com/unique






              share|improve this answer





























                0














                Unique.



                Unique means ‘singular, or only happening once.’



                It is from the word one - etymology - ‘early 17th century: from French, from Latin unicus, from unus ‘one’.’



                A unique event. One that happens only once.



                Unique has also been broadened to mean ‘unusual or rare’ but then, things that only happen once, generally are that.



                https://www.thefreedictionary.com/unique






                share|improve this answer



























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  Unique.



                  Unique means ‘singular, or only happening once.’



                  It is from the word one - etymology - ‘early 17th century: from French, from Latin unicus, from unus ‘one’.’



                  A unique event. One that happens only once.



                  Unique has also been broadened to mean ‘unusual or rare’ but then, things that only happen once, generally are that.



                  https://www.thefreedictionary.com/unique






                  share|improve this answer













                  Unique.



                  Unique means ‘singular, or only happening once.’



                  It is from the word one - etymology - ‘early 17th century: from French, from Latin unicus, from unus ‘one’.’



                  A unique event. One that happens only once.



                  Unique has also been broadened to mean ‘unusual or rare’ but then, things that only happen once, generally are that.



                  https://www.thefreedictionary.com/unique







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 49 mins ago









                  JelilaJelila

                  3,2671 gold badge3 silver badges16 bronze badges




                  3,2671 gold badge3 silver badges16 bronze badges























                      Thaddeus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      Thaddeus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      Thaddeus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                      Thaddeus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                      Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f508125%2fword-for-an-event-that-will-likely-never-happen-again%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                      Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                      Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її