Are employers legally allowed to pay employees in goods and services equal to or greater than the minimum wage?Are there any laws the require subscription services to be prorated?Are passenger services legally obligated to provide the names of passengers?Are McKenzie Friends Allowed in The United States?Can one legally barter services if each party declares they are donating the service?When can “exact change” policies be enforced?Would the end of “net neutrality” legally allow individual ISPs to block access to/censor sites and services?Is this opinion by the Wage & Hour Division, disallowing fines/salary deductions for lost & damaged property, generally applicable to US employers?Are parents allowed to not pay for their children's surgery?Can a landlord charge for pet rent without pets?Are Police legally allowed to confiscate a Camera and Phone over “suspicious activity”?

If clocks themselves are based on light signals, wouldn't we expect the measured speed of light to always be the same constant?

On math looking obvious in retrospect

How much maintenance time did it take to make an F4U Corsair ready for another flight?

Why command hierarchy, if the chain of command is standing next to each other?

Can "être sur" mean "to be about" ?

How to reduce Sinas Chinam

What is a good class if we remove subclasses?

Heat equation: Squiggly lines

What is the status of the F-1B engine development?

PhD advisor lost funding, need advice

How can I categorize files in a directory based on their content?

Does fossil fuels use since 1990 account for half of all the fossil fuels used in history?

A Non Math Puzzle. What is the middle number?

Can anybody explain why using multicolumn changes the width of the four-column tabular environment?

How to divide item stack in MC PE?

Why are Gatwick's runways too close together?

How does proof assistant organize knowledge?

Enigma between Collegues (Part1)

How are you supposed to know the strumming pattern for a song from the "chord sheet music"?

Super Duper Vdd stiffening required on 555 timer, what is the best way?

Is this curved text blend possible in Illustrator?

80's/90's superhero cartoon with a man on fire and a man who made ice runways like Frozone

How to take the beginning and end parts of a list with simpler syntax?

Are differences between uniformly distributed numbers uniformly distributed?



Are employers legally allowed to pay employees in goods and services equal to or greater than the minimum wage?


Are there any laws the require subscription services to be prorated?Are passenger services legally obligated to provide the names of passengers?Are McKenzie Friends Allowed in The United States?Can one legally barter services if each party declares they are donating the service?When can “exact change” policies be enforced?Would the end of “net neutrality” legally allow individual ISPs to block access to/censor sites and services?Is this opinion by the Wage & Hour Division, disallowing fines/salary deductions for lost & damaged property, generally applicable to US employers?Are parents allowed to not pay for their children's surgery?Can a landlord charge for pet rent without pets?Are Police legally allowed to confiscate a Camera and Phone over “suspicious activity”?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








8















In the United States, full-time employees (not contractors) must be paid a minimum wage per hour. Assuming both parties agree to it, are they legally allowed to be paid in goods and services equal to or greater than the minimum wage?



For example, if a restaurant worker earns a $7.25 minimum wage, would it be legal for another worker to be paid in $7.25 worth of food per hour?










share|improve this question





















  • 1





    Are you just asking whether the federal minimum wage law allows this? Many states have their own minimum wage laws that may have different requirements (and amounts). By the way, the federal minimum wage is currently $7.25 per hour, not $10.

    – Nate Eldredge
    9 hours ago






  • 1





    @NateEldredge Yes, that is what I am asking. I updated the question to reflect the federal minimum wage.

    – Evorlor
    9 hours ago











  • Are you asking if a worker can legally agree to this, or are you asking if an employer can unilaterally impose this on a worker who would prefer cash (e.g. "As of next week, you will be paid in crates of Cream of Chicken soup only, based on a survey of local retail prices. I am legally allowed to do this under the Truth in Minimum Wage and In-Kind Compensation Act of 1973. If you do not like this, you can quit!")?

    – Robert Columbia
    7 hours ago












  • @RobertColumbia I am asking if this is legal assuming both parties agree to it.

    – Evorlor
    5 hours ago






  • 1





    This page says yes, but does not give references.

    – Nate Eldredge
    2 hours ago

















8















In the United States, full-time employees (not contractors) must be paid a minimum wage per hour. Assuming both parties agree to it, are they legally allowed to be paid in goods and services equal to or greater than the minimum wage?



For example, if a restaurant worker earns a $7.25 minimum wage, would it be legal for another worker to be paid in $7.25 worth of food per hour?










share|improve this question





















  • 1





    Are you just asking whether the federal minimum wage law allows this? Many states have their own minimum wage laws that may have different requirements (and amounts). By the way, the federal minimum wage is currently $7.25 per hour, not $10.

    – Nate Eldredge
    9 hours ago






  • 1





    @NateEldredge Yes, that is what I am asking. I updated the question to reflect the federal minimum wage.

    – Evorlor
    9 hours ago











  • Are you asking if a worker can legally agree to this, or are you asking if an employer can unilaterally impose this on a worker who would prefer cash (e.g. "As of next week, you will be paid in crates of Cream of Chicken soup only, based on a survey of local retail prices. I am legally allowed to do this under the Truth in Minimum Wage and In-Kind Compensation Act of 1973. If you do not like this, you can quit!")?

    – Robert Columbia
    7 hours ago












  • @RobertColumbia I am asking if this is legal assuming both parties agree to it.

    – Evorlor
    5 hours ago






  • 1





    This page says yes, but does not give references.

    – Nate Eldredge
    2 hours ago













8












8








8


1






In the United States, full-time employees (not contractors) must be paid a minimum wage per hour. Assuming both parties agree to it, are they legally allowed to be paid in goods and services equal to or greater than the minimum wage?



For example, if a restaurant worker earns a $7.25 minimum wage, would it be legal for another worker to be paid in $7.25 worth of food per hour?










share|improve this question
















In the United States, full-time employees (not contractors) must be paid a minimum wage per hour. Assuming both parties agree to it, are they legally allowed to be paid in goods and services equal to or greater than the minimum wage?



For example, if a restaurant worker earns a $7.25 minimum wage, would it be legal for another worker to be paid in $7.25 worth of food per hour?







united-states barter






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 5 hours ago







Evorlor

















asked 9 hours ago









EvorlorEvorlor

3653 silver badges8 bronze badges




3653 silver badges8 bronze badges










  • 1





    Are you just asking whether the federal minimum wage law allows this? Many states have their own minimum wage laws that may have different requirements (and amounts). By the way, the federal minimum wage is currently $7.25 per hour, not $10.

    – Nate Eldredge
    9 hours ago






  • 1





    @NateEldredge Yes, that is what I am asking. I updated the question to reflect the federal minimum wage.

    – Evorlor
    9 hours ago











  • Are you asking if a worker can legally agree to this, or are you asking if an employer can unilaterally impose this on a worker who would prefer cash (e.g. "As of next week, you will be paid in crates of Cream of Chicken soup only, based on a survey of local retail prices. I am legally allowed to do this under the Truth in Minimum Wage and In-Kind Compensation Act of 1973. If you do not like this, you can quit!")?

    – Robert Columbia
    7 hours ago












  • @RobertColumbia I am asking if this is legal assuming both parties agree to it.

    – Evorlor
    5 hours ago






  • 1





    This page says yes, but does not give references.

    – Nate Eldredge
    2 hours ago












  • 1





    Are you just asking whether the federal minimum wage law allows this? Many states have their own minimum wage laws that may have different requirements (and amounts). By the way, the federal minimum wage is currently $7.25 per hour, not $10.

    – Nate Eldredge
    9 hours ago






  • 1





    @NateEldredge Yes, that is what I am asking. I updated the question to reflect the federal minimum wage.

    – Evorlor
    9 hours ago











  • Are you asking if a worker can legally agree to this, or are you asking if an employer can unilaterally impose this on a worker who would prefer cash (e.g. "As of next week, you will be paid in crates of Cream of Chicken soup only, based on a survey of local retail prices. I am legally allowed to do this under the Truth in Minimum Wage and In-Kind Compensation Act of 1973. If you do not like this, you can quit!")?

    – Robert Columbia
    7 hours ago












  • @RobertColumbia I am asking if this is legal assuming both parties agree to it.

    – Evorlor
    5 hours ago






  • 1





    This page says yes, but does not give references.

    – Nate Eldredge
    2 hours ago







1




1





Are you just asking whether the federal minimum wage law allows this? Many states have their own minimum wage laws that may have different requirements (and amounts). By the way, the federal minimum wage is currently $7.25 per hour, not $10.

– Nate Eldredge
9 hours ago





Are you just asking whether the federal minimum wage law allows this? Many states have their own minimum wage laws that may have different requirements (and amounts). By the way, the federal minimum wage is currently $7.25 per hour, not $10.

– Nate Eldredge
9 hours ago




1




1





@NateEldredge Yes, that is what I am asking. I updated the question to reflect the federal minimum wage.

– Evorlor
9 hours ago





@NateEldredge Yes, that is what I am asking. I updated the question to reflect the federal minimum wage.

– Evorlor
9 hours ago













Are you asking if a worker can legally agree to this, or are you asking if an employer can unilaterally impose this on a worker who would prefer cash (e.g. "As of next week, you will be paid in crates of Cream of Chicken soup only, based on a survey of local retail prices. I am legally allowed to do this under the Truth in Minimum Wage and In-Kind Compensation Act of 1973. If you do not like this, you can quit!")?

– Robert Columbia
7 hours ago






Are you asking if a worker can legally agree to this, or are you asking if an employer can unilaterally impose this on a worker who would prefer cash (e.g. "As of next week, you will be paid in crates of Cream of Chicken soup only, based on a survey of local retail prices. I am legally allowed to do this under the Truth in Minimum Wage and In-Kind Compensation Act of 1973. If you do not like this, you can quit!")?

– Robert Columbia
7 hours ago














@RobertColumbia I am asking if this is legal assuming both parties agree to it.

– Evorlor
5 hours ago





@RobertColumbia I am asking if this is legal assuming both parties agree to it.

– Evorlor
5 hours ago




1




1





This page says yes, but does not give references.

– Nate Eldredge
2 hours ago





This page says yes, but does not give references.

– Nate Eldredge
2 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















9














As described, no.



Paying employees with benefits instead of money is called in kind remuneration. There are various limits on in kind payments around the world, including the US. Very generally, in kind payments are only allowed for particular industries and occupations, only allowed up to a certain dollar value, and only allowed as a certain fraction of the employee's wages. Furthermore, the value of the benefit can't exceed the actual cost to the employer - a meal that's priced at $7.25 on the menu is sold at a profit, and would be worth less than the menu price as in kind remuneration.



So, given the scenario described, a restaurant employer could not replace 100% of their employee's wages with food sold for the same amount. It's too high a percentage of the wage paid as in kind payment, and the menu price equivalent of the wage would not have sufficient in kind value.



A more detailed description of in kind payment laws can be found here.






share|improve this answer






















  • 1





    The document you've linked is 93 pages and covers laws all over the world. Can you point to where it explains this provision of US federal law in particular? I would like to see a citation of a specific US statute / regulation / case where this is established.

    – Nate Eldredge
    2 hours ago







  • 1





    Handy Reference Guide to the Fair Labor Standards Act "Deductions made from wages for such items as cash or merchandise shortages, employer-required uniforms, and tools of the trade, are not legal to the extent that they reduce the wages of employees below the minimum rate required by the FLSA or reduce the amount of overtime pay due under the FLSA."

    – David C. Rankin
    2 hours ago













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "617"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f43641%2fare-employers-legally-allowed-to-pay-employees-in-goods-and-services-equal-to-or%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









9














As described, no.



Paying employees with benefits instead of money is called in kind remuneration. There are various limits on in kind payments around the world, including the US. Very generally, in kind payments are only allowed for particular industries and occupations, only allowed up to a certain dollar value, and only allowed as a certain fraction of the employee's wages. Furthermore, the value of the benefit can't exceed the actual cost to the employer - a meal that's priced at $7.25 on the menu is sold at a profit, and would be worth less than the menu price as in kind remuneration.



So, given the scenario described, a restaurant employer could not replace 100% of their employee's wages with food sold for the same amount. It's too high a percentage of the wage paid as in kind payment, and the menu price equivalent of the wage would not have sufficient in kind value.



A more detailed description of in kind payment laws can be found here.






share|improve this answer






















  • 1





    The document you've linked is 93 pages and covers laws all over the world. Can you point to where it explains this provision of US federal law in particular? I would like to see a citation of a specific US statute / regulation / case where this is established.

    – Nate Eldredge
    2 hours ago







  • 1





    Handy Reference Guide to the Fair Labor Standards Act "Deductions made from wages for such items as cash or merchandise shortages, employer-required uniforms, and tools of the trade, are not legal to the extent that they reduce the wages of employees below the minimum rate required by the FLSA or reduce the amount of overtime pay due under the FLSA."

    – David C. Rankin
    2 hours ago















9














As described, no.



Paying employees with benefits instead of money is called in kind remuneration. There are various limits on in kind payments around the world, including the US. Very generally, in kind payments are only allowed for particular industries and occupations, only allowed up to a certain dollar value, and only allowed as a certain fraction of the employee's wages. Furthermore, the value of the benefit can't exceed the actual cost to the employer - a meal that's priced at $7.25 on the menu is sold at a profit, and would be worth less than the menu price as in kind remuneration.



So, given the scenario described, a restaurant employer could not replace 100% of their employee's wages with food sold for the same amount. It's too high a percentage of the wage paid as in kind payment, and the menu price equivalent of the wage would not have sufficient in kind value.



A more detailed description of in kind payment laws can be found here.






share|improve this answer






















  • 1





    The document you've linked is 93 pages and covers laws all over the world. Can you point to where it explains this provision of US federal law in particular? I would like to see a citation of a specific US statute / regulation / case where this is established.

    – Nate Eldredge
    2 hours ago







  • 1





    Handy Reference Guide to the Fair Labor Standards Act "Deductions made from wages for such items as cash or merchandise shortages, employer-required uniforms, and tools of the trade, are not legal to the extent that they reduce the wages of employees below the minimum rate required by the FLSA or reduce the amount of overtime pay due under the FLSA."

    – David C. Rankin
    2 hours ago













9












9








9







As described, no.



Paying employees with benefits instead of money is called in kind remuneration. There are various limits on in kind payments around the world, including the US. Very generally, in kind payments are only allowed for particular industries and occupations, only allowed up to a certain dollar value, and only allowed as a certain fraction of the employee's wages. Furthermore, the value of the benefit can't exceed the actual cost to the employer - a meal that's priced at $7.25 on the menu is sold at a profit, and would be worth less than the menu price as in kind remuneration.



So, given the scenario described, a restaurant employer could not replace 100% of their employee's wages with food sold for the same amount. It's too high a percentage of the wage paid as in kind payment, and the menu price equivalent of the wage would not have sufficient in kind value.



A more detailed description of in kind payment laws can be found here.






share|improve this answer















As described, no.



Paying employees with benefits instead of money is called in kind remuneration. There are various limits on in kind payments around the world, including the US. Very generally, in kind payments are only allowed for particular industries and occupations, only allowed up to a certain dollar value, and only allowed as a certain fraction of the employee's wages. Furthermore, the value of the benefit can't exceed the actual cost to the employer - a meal that's priced at $7.25 on the menu is sold at a profit, and would be worth less than the menu price as in kind remuneration.



So, given the scenario described, a restaurant employer could not replace 100% of their employee's wages with food sold for the same amount. It's too high a percentage of the wage paid as in kind payment, and the menu price equivalent of the wage would not have sufficient in kind value.



A more detailed description of in kind payment laws can be found here.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 4 hours ago

























answered 4 hours ago









Nuclear WangNuclear Wang

1,6518 silver badges9 bronze badges




1,6518 silver badges9 bronze badges










  • 1





    The document you've linked is 93 pages and covers laws all over the world. Can you point to where it explains this provision of US federal law in particular? I would like to see a citation of a specific US statute / regulation / case where this is established.

    – Nate Eldredge
    2 hours ago







  • 1





    Handy Reference Guide to the Fair Labor Standards Act "Deductions made from wages for such items as cash or merchandise shortages, employer-required uniforms, and tools of the trade, are not legal to the extent that they reduce the wages of employees below the minimum rate required by the FLSA or reduce the amount of overtime pay due under the FLSA."

    – David C. Rankin
    2 hours ago












  • 1





    The document you've linked is 93 pages and covers laws all over the world. Can you point to where it explains this provision of US federal law in particular? I would like to see a citation of a specific US statute / regulation / case where this is established.

    – Nate Eldredge
    2 hours ago







  • 1





    Handy Reference Guide to the Fair Labor Standards Act "Deductions made from wages for such items as cash or merchandise shortages, employer-required uniforms, and tools of the trade, are not legal to the extent that they reduce the wages of employees below the minimum rate required by the FLSA or reduce the amount of overtime pay due under the FLSA."

    – David C. Rankin
    2 hours ago







1




1





The document you've linked is 93 pages and covers laws all over the world. Can you point to where it explains this provision of US federal law in particular? I would like to see a citation of a specific US statute / regulation / case where this is established.

– Nate Eldredge
2 hours ago






The document you've linked is 93 pages and covers laws all over the world. Can you point to where it explains this provision of US federal law in particular? I would like to see a citation of a specific US statute / regulation / case where this is established.

– Nate Eldredge
2 hours ago





1




1





Handy Reference Guide to the Fair Labor Standards Act "Deductions made from wages for such items as cash or merchandise shortages, employer-required uniforms, and tools of the trade, are not legal to the extent that they reduce the wages of employees below the minimum rate required by the FLSA or reduce the amount of overtime pay due under the FLSA."

– David C. Rankin
2 hours ago





Handy Reference Guide to the Fair Labor Standards Act "Deductions made from wages for such items as cash or merchandise shortages, employer-required uniforms, and tools of the trade, are not legal to the extent that they reduce the wages of employees below the minimum rate required by the FLSA or reduce the amount of overtime pay due under the FLSA."

– David C. Rankin
2 hours ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Law Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f43641%2fare-employers-legally-allowed-to-pay-employees-in-goods-and-services-equal-to-or%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

199年 目錄 大件事 到箇年出世嗰人 到箇年死嗰人 節慶、風俗習慣 導覽選單