Support of measurable function is measurable?If $f$ is measurable, then support of $f$ is measurable?Support of measurable function regular?Equivalent conditions for a measurable functionComposition of 2 Lebesgue measurable functions is not lebesgue measurable: Are these two functions Borel Measurable?A function that is Lebesgue integrable but not measurable (not absurd obviously)Equivalency of two forms of Lebesgue measurabilityA simple proof that there exixsts lebesgue measurable sets, not borel measurableLebesgue Measurable via open setIs the composition of two Lebesgue Measurable functions necessarily Lebesgue measurable?Existence/examples of a non measurable function measurable on its supportIf $f_n_n=1^infty$ is a sequence of measurable functions, then $sup_n f_n(x)$ is measurable
Civic overheating and hoses popping
Does the Pole of Angling's command word require an action?
What is the measurable difference between dry basil and fresh?
Was I subtly told to resign?
How can I get a player to accept that they should stop trying to pull stunts without thinking them through first?
Some interesting calculation puzzle that I made
Is "De qui parles-tu" (for example) as formal as it is in English, or is it normal for the French to casually say that
Credit score and financing new car
If your plane is out-of-control, why does military training instruct releasing the joystick to neutralize controls?
OR-backed serious games
Single word for "refusing to move to next activity unless present one is completed."
This one's for Matthew:
Salt, pepper, herbs and spices
Placing text inside a loop
Why isn't pressure filtration popular compared to vacuum filtration?
What happens to unproductive professors?
Is English unusual in having no second person plural form?
Why did Harry Potter get a bedroom?
Would dual wielding daggers be a viable choice for a covert bodyguard?
Why doesn't sea level show seasonality?
What does the phrase "head down the rat's hole" mean here?
How can I truly shut down ssh server?
Why is the air gap between the stator and rotor on a motor kept as small as it is?
Is there any reason why MCU changed the Snap to Blip
Support of measurable function is measurable?
If $f$ is measurable, then support of $f$ is measurable?Support of measurable function regular?Equivalent conditions for a measurable functionComposition of 2 Lebesgue measurable functions is not lebesgue measurable: Are these two functions Borel Measurable?A function that is Lebesgue integrable but not measurable (not absurd obviously)Equivalency of two forms of Lebesgue measurabilityA simple proof that there exixsts lebesgue measurable sets, not borel measurableLebesgue Measurable via open setIs the composition of two Lebesgue Measurable functions necessarily Lebesgue measurable?Existence/examples of a non measurable function measurable on its supportIf $f_n_n=1^infty$ is a sequence of measurable functions, then $sup_n f_n(x)$ is measurable
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
Let $f$ be a Lebesgue measurable function defined on a set $Esubset mathbbR^d$. Let $xin Emid f(x)neq 0 $ be the support of the function on $E$.
Stein and Shakarchi claim without proof that the support is measurable. But why is this true? It's not just due to the fact that the support is a subset of a measurable set.
real-analysis measure-theory lebesgue-measure
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f$ be a Lebesgue measurable function defined on a set $Esubset mathbbR^d$. Let $xin Emid f(x)neq 0 $ be the support of the function on $E$.
Stein and Shakarchi claim without proof that the support is measurable. But why is this true? It's not just due to the fact that the support is a subset of a measurable set.
real-analysis measure-theory lebesgue-measure
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of If $f$ is measurable, then support of $f$ is measurable?
$endgroup$
– Meni
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f$ be a Lebesgue measurable function defined on a set $Esubset mathbbR^d$. Let $xin Emid f(x)neq 0 $ be the support of the function on $E$.
Stein and Shakarchi claim without proof that the support is measurable. But why is this true? It's not just due to the fact that the support is a subset of a measurable set.
real-analysis measure-theory lebesgue-measure
$endgroup$
Let $f$ be a Lebesgue measurable function defined on a set $Esubset mathbbR^d$. Let $xin Emid f(x)neq 0 $ be the support of the function on $E$.
Stein and Shakarchi claim without proof that the support is measurable. But why is this true? It's not just due to the fact that the support is a subset of a measurable set.
real-analysis measure-theory lebesgue-measure
real-analysis measure-theory lebesgue-measure
asked 8 hours ago
ponchanponchan
4163 silver badges9 bronze badges
4163 silver badges9 bronze badges
3
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of If $f$ is measurable, then support of $f$ is measurable?
$endgroup$
– Meni
8 hours ago
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of If $f$ is measurable, then support of $f$ is measurable?
$endgroup$
– Meni
8 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of If $f$ is measurable, then support of $f$ is measurable?
$endgroup$
– Meni
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of If $f$ is measurable, then support of $f$ is measurable?
$endgroup$
– Meni
8 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The support is usually defined as the closure of that set, but I'll answer your specific question.
Note that your set is precisely $$f^-1 ((-infty,0)cup (0,infty))=f^-1((-infty,0))cup f^-1((0,infty)).$$ Now, just recall the definition of a Lebesgue measurable function.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As a general rule, anything that you can define explicitly in terms of a measurable function or sequence of functions is going to turn out to be measurable; it takes a little trick to show that not every set is measurable.
That's too broad to be provable, but this particular example is trivial. Say $f=u+iv$ where $u$ and $v$ are real-valued. Then $f(x)ne0=u(x)ne0cupv(x)ne0$. So you can assume wlog that $f$ is real-valued. So $f(x)ne0=f(x)>0cupf(x)<0$, the union of two measurable sets.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A function $f:mathbbR^dmapsto mathbbR$ is Lebesque measurable by definition if
$$xin mathbbR^d $$
is measureable for all $ain mathbbR$. Equivilently you may use $leq, <$ or $geq$ instead of $>$. Therefor
$$ xin mathbbR^d = f(x) > 0 cupxin mathbbR^d $$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3287966%2fsupport-of-measurable-function-is-measurable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The support is usually defined as the closure of that set, but I'll answer your specific question.
Note that your set is precisely $$f^-1 ((-infty,0)cup (0,infty))=f^-1((-infty,0))cup f^-1((0,infty)).$$ Now, just recall the definition of a Lebesgue measurable function.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The support is usually defined as the closure of that set, but I'll answer your specific question.
Note that your set is precisely $$f^-1 ((-infty,0)cup (0,infty))=f^-1((-infty,0))cup f^-1((0,infty)).$$ Now, just recall the definition of a Lebesgue measurable function.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The support is usually defined as the closure of that set, but I'll answer your specific question.
Note that your set is precisely $$f^-1 ((-infty,0)cup (0,infty))=f^-1((-infty,0))cup f^-1((0,infty)).$$ Now, just recall the definition of a Lebesgue measurable function.
$endgroup$
The support is usually defined as the closure of that set, but I'll answer your specific question.
Note that your set is precisely $$f^-1 ((-infty,0)cup (0,infty))=f^-1((-infty,0))cup f^-1((0,infty)).$$ Now, just recall the definition of a Lebesgue measurable function.
edited 8 hours ago
answered 8 hours ago
cmkcmk
4,1971 gold badge7 silver badges25 bronze badges
4,1971 gold badge7 silver badges25 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As a general rule, anything that you can define explicitly in terms of a measurable function or sequence of functions is going to turn out to be measurable; it takes a little trick to show that not every set is measurable.
That's too broad to be provable, but this particular example is trivial. Say $f=u+iv$ where $u$ and $v$ are real-valued. Then $f(x)ne0=u(x)ne0cupv(x)ne0$. So you can assume wlog that $f$ is real-valued. So $f(x)ne0=f(x)>0cupf(x)<0$, the union of two measurable sets.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As a general rule, anything that you can define explicitly in terms of a measurable function or sequence of functions is going to turn out to be measurable; it takes a little trick to show that not every set is measurable.
That's too broad to be provable, but this particular example is trivial. Say $f=u+iv$ where $u$ and $v$ are real-valued. Then $f(x)ne0=u(x)ne0cupv(x)ne0$. So you can assume wlog that $f$ is real-valued. So $f(x)ne0=f(x)>0cupf(x)<0$, the union of two measurable sets.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As a general rule, anything that you can define explicitly in terms of a measurable function or sequence of functions is going to turn out to be measurable; it takes a little trick to show that not every set is measurable.
That's too broad to be provable, but this particular example is trivial. Say $f=u+iv$ where $u$ and $v$ are real-valued. Then $f(x)ne0=u(x)ne0cupv(x)ne0$. So you can assume wlog that $f$ is real-valued. So $f(x)ne0=f(x)>0cupf(x)<0$, the union of two measurable sets.
$endgroup$
As a general rule, anything that you can define explicitly in terms of a measurable function or sequence of functions is going to turn out to be measurable; it takes a little trick to show that not every set is measurable.
That's too broad to be provable, but this particular example is trivial. Say $f=u+iv$ where $u$ and $v$ are real-valued. Then $f(x)ne0=u(x)ne0cupv(x)ne0$. So you can assume wlog that $f$ is real-valued. So $f(x)ne0=f(x)>0cupf(x)<0$, the union of two measurable sets.
answered 8 hours ago
David C. UllrichDavid C. Ullrich
64.1k4 gold badges44 silver badges99 bronze badges
64.1k4 gold badges44 silver badges99 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A function $f:mathbbR^dmapsto mathbbR$ is Lebesque measurable by definition if
$$xin mathbbR^d $$
is measureable for all $ain mathbbR$. Equivilently you may use $leq, <$ or $geq$ instead of $>$. Therefor
$$ xin mathbbR^d = f(x) > 0 cupxin mathbbR^d $$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A function $f:mathbbR^dmapsto mathbbR$ is Lebesque measurable by definition if
$$xin mathbbR^d $$
is measureable for all $ain mathbbR$. Equivilently you may use $leq, <$ or $geq$ instead of $>$. Therefor
$$ xin mathbbR^d = f(x) > 0 cupxin mathbbR^d $$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A function $f:mathbbR^dmapsto mathbbR$ is Lebesque measurable by definition if
$$xin mathbbR^d $$
is measureable for all $ain mathbbR$. Equivilently you may use $leq, <$ or $geq$ instead of $>$. Therefor
$$ xin mathbbR^d = f(x) > 0 cupxin mathbbR^d $$
$endgroup$
A function $f:mathbbR^dmapsto mathbbR$ is Lebesque measurable by definition if
$$xin mathbbR^d $$
is measureable for all $ain mathbbR$. Equivilently you may use $leq, <$ or $geq$ instead of $>$. Therefor
$$ xin mathbbR^d = f(x) > 0 cupxin mathbbR^d $$
answered 8 hours ago
DaytonDayton
3361 silver badge13 bronze badges
3361 silver badge13 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3287966%2fsupport-of-measurable-function-is-measurable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of If $f$ is measurable, then support of $f$ is measurable?
$endgroup$
– Meni
8 hours ago