Support of measurable function is measurable?If $f$ is measurable, then support of $f$ is measurable?Support of measurable function regular?Equivalent conditions for a measurable functionComposition of 2 Lebesgue measurable functions is not lebesgue measurable: Are these two functions Borel Measurable?A function that is Lebesgue integrable but not measurable (not absurd obviously)Equivalency of two forms of Lebesgue measurabilityA simple proof that there exixsts lebesgue measurable sets, not borel measurableLebesgue Measurable via open setIs the composition of two Lebesgue Measurable functions necessarily Lebesgue measurable?Existence/examples of a non measurable function measurable on its supportIf $f_n_n=1^infty$ is a sequence of measurable functions, then $sup_n f_n(x)$ is measurable

Civic overheating and hoses popping

Does the Pole of Angling's command word require an action?

What is the measurable difference between dry basil and fresh?

Was I subtly told to resign?

How can I get a player to accept that they should stop trying to pull stunts without thinking them through first?

Some interesting calculation puzzle that I made

Is "De qui parles-tu" (for example) as formal as it is in English, or is it normal for the French to casually say that

Credit score and financing new car

If your plane is out-of-control, why does military training instruct releasing the joystick to neutralize controls?

OR-backed serious games

Single word for "refusing to move to next activity unless present one is completed."

This one's for Matthew:

Salt, pepper, herbs and spices

Placing text inside a loop

Why isn't pressure filtration popular compared to vacuum filtration?

What happens to unproductive professors?

Is English unusual in having no second person plural form?

Why did Harry Potter get a bedroom?

Would dual wielding daggers be a viable choice for a covert bodyguard?

Why doesn't sea level show seasonality?

What does the phrase "head down the rat's hole" mean here?

How can I truly shut down ssh server?

Why is the air gap between the stator and rotor on a motor kept as small as it is?

Is there any reason why MCU changed the Snap to Blip



Support of measurable function is measurable?


If $f$ is measurable, then support of $f$ is measurable?Support of measurable function regular?Equivalent conditions for a measurable functionComposition of 2 Lebesgue measurable functions is not lebesgue measurable: Are these two functions Borel Measurable?A function that is Lebesgue integrable but not measurable (not absurd obviously)Equivalency of two forms of Lebesgue measurabilityA simple proof that there exixsts lebesgue measurable sets, not borel measurableLebesgue Measurable via open setIs the composition of two Lebesgue Measurable functions necessarily Lebesgue measurable?Existence/examples of a non measurable function measurable on its supportIf $f_n_n=1^infty$ is a sequence of measurable functions, then $sup_n f_n(x)$ is measurable






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2












$begingroup$


Let $f$ be a Lebesgue measurable function defined on a set $Esubset mathbbR^d$. Let $xin Emid f(x)neq 0 $ be the support of the function on $E$.



Stein and Shakarchi claim without proof that the support is measurable. But why is this true? It's not just due to the fact that the support is a subset of a measurable set.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of If $f$ is measurable, then support of $f$ is measurable?
    $endgroup$
    – Meni
    8 hours ago

















2












$begingroup$


Let $f$ be a Lebesgue measurable function defined on a set $Esubset mathbbR^d$. Let $xin Emid f(x)neq 0 $ be the support of the function on $E$.



Stein and Shakarchi claim without proof that the support is measurable. But why is this true? It's not just due to the fact that the support is a subset of a measurable set.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of If $f$ is measurable, then support of $f$ is measurable?
    $endgroup$
    – Meni
    8 hours ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$


Let $f$ be a Lebesgue measurable function defined on a set $Esubset mathbbR^d$. Let $xin Emid f(x)neq 0 $ be the support of the function on $E$.



Stein and Shakarchi claim without proof that the support is measurable. But why is this true? It's not just due to the fact that the support is a subset of a measurable set.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Let $f$ be a Lebesgue measurable function defined on a set $Esubset mathbbR^d$. Let $xin Emid f(x)neq 0 $ be the support of the function on $E$.



Stein and Shakarchi claim without proof that the support is measurable. But why is this true? It's not just due to the fact that the support is a subset of a measurable set.







real-analysis measure-theory lebesgue-measure






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 8 hours ago









ponchanponchan

4163 silver badges9 bronze badges




4163 silver badges9 bronze badges







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of If $f$ is measurable, then support of $f$ is measurable?
    $endgroup$
    – Meni
    8 hours ago












  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of If $f$ is measurable, then support of $f$ is measurable?
    $endgroup$
    – Meni
    8 hours ago







3




3




$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of If $f$ is measurable, then support of $f$ is measurable?
$endgroup$
– Meni
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of If $f$ is measurable, then support of $f$ is measurable?
$endgroup$
– Meni
8 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

The support is usually defined as the closure of that set, but I'll answer your specific question.



Note that your set is precisely $$f^-1 ((-infty,0)cup (0,infty))=f^-1((-infty,0))cup f^-1((0,infty)).$$ Now, just recall the definition of a Lebesgue measurable function.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    3












    $begingroup$

    As a general rule, anything that you can define explicitly in terms of a measurable function or sequence of functions is going to turn out to be measurable; it takes a little trick to show that not every set is measurable.



    That's too broad to be provable, but this particular example is trivial. Say $f=u+iv$ where $u$ and $v$ are real-valued. Then $f(x)ne0=u(x)ne0cupv(x)ne0$. So you can assume wlog that $f$ is real-valued. So $f(x)ne0=f(x)>0cupf(x)<0$, the union of two measurable sets.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      0












      $begingroup$

      A function $f:mathbbR^dmapsto mathbbR$ is Lebesque measurable by definition if
      $$xin mathbbR^d $$
      is measureable for all $ain mathbbR$. Equivilently you may use $leq, <$ or $geq$ instead of $>$. Therefor
      $$ xin mathbbR^d = f(x) > 0 cupxin mathbbR^d $$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );













        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3287966%2fsupport-of-measurable-function-is-measurable%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        3












        $begingroup$

        The support is usually defined as the closure of that set, but I'll answer your specific question.



        Note that your set is precisely $$f^-1 ((-infty,0)cup (0,infty))=f^-1((-infty,0))cup f^-1((0,infty)).$$ Now, just recall the definition of a Lebesgue measurable function.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$

















          3












          $begingroup$

          The support is usually defined as the closure of that set, but I'll answer your specific question.



          Note that your set is precisely $$f^-1 ((-infty,0)cup (0,infty))=f^-1((-infty,0))cup f^-1((0,infty)).$$ Now, just recall the definition of a Lebesgue measurable function.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$















            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            The support is usually defined as the closure of that set, but I'll answer your specific question.



            Note that your set is precisely $$f^-1 ((-infty,0)cup (0,infty))=f^-1((-infty,0))cup f^-1((0,infty)).$$ Now, just recall the definition of a Lebesgue measurable function.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            The support is usually defined as the closure of that set, but I'll answer your specific question.



            Note that your set is precisely $$f^-1 ((-infty,0)cup (0,infty))=f^-1((-infty,0))cup f^-1((0,infty)).$$ Now, just recall the definition of a Lebesgue measurable function.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 8 hours ago

























            answered 8 hours ago









            cmkcmk

            4,1971 gold badge7 silver badges25 bronze badges




            4,1971 gold badge7 silver badges25 bronze badges























                3












                $begingroup$

                As a general rule, anything that you can define explicitly in terms of a measurable function or sequence of functions is going to turn out to be measurable; it takes a little trick to show that not every set is measurable.



                That's too broad to be provable, but this particular example is trivial. Say $f=u+iv$ where $u$ and $v$ are real-valued. Then $f(x)ne0=u(x)ne0cupv(x)ne0$. So you can assume wlog that $f$ is real-valued. So $f(x)ne0=f(x)>0cupf(x)<0$, the union of two measurable sets.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$

















                  3












                  $begingroup$

                  As a general rule, anything that you can define explicitly in terms of a measurable function or sequence of functions is going to turn out to be measurable; it takes a little trick to show that not every set is measurable.



                  That's too broad to be provable, but this particular example is trivial. Say $f=u+iv$ where $u$ and $v$ are real-valued. Then $f(x)ne0=u(x)ne0cupv(x)ne0$. So you can assume wlog that $f$ is real-valued. So $f(x)ne0=f(x)>0cupf(x)<0$, the union of two measurable sets.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$















                    3












                    3








                    3





                    $begingroup$

                    As a general rule, anything that you can define explicitly in terms of a measurable function or sequence of functions is going to turn out to be measurable; it takes a little trick to show that not every set is measurable.



                    That's too broad to be provable, but this particular example is trivial. Say $f=u+iv$ where $u$ and $v$ are real-valued. Then $f(x)ne0=u(x)ne0cupv(x)ne0$. So you can assume wlog that $f$ is real-valued. So $f(x)ne0=f(x)>0cupf(x)<0$, the union of two measurable sets.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    As a general rule, anything that you can define explicitly in terms of a measurable function or sequence of functions is going to turn out to be measurable; it takes a little trick to show that not every set is measurable.



                    That's too broad to be provable, but this particular example is trivial. Say $f=u+iv$ where $u$ and $v$ are real-valued. Then $f(x)ne0=u(x)ne0cupv(x)ne0$. So you can assume wlog that $f$ is real-valued. So $f(x)ne0=f(x)>0cupf(x)<0$, the union of two measurable sets.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered 8 hours ago









                    David C. UllrichDavid C. Ullrich

                    64.1k4 gold badges44 silver badges99 bronze badges




                    64.1k4 gold badges44 silver badges99 bronze badges





















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        A function $f:mathbbR^dmapsto mathbbR$ is Lebesque measurable by definition if
                        $$xin mathbbR^d $$
                        is measureable for all $ain mathbbR$. Equivilently you may use $leq, <$ or $geq$ instead of $>$. Therefor
                        $$ xin mathbbR^d = f(x) > 0 cupxin mathbbR^d $$






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$

















                          0












                          $begingroup$

                          A function $f:mathbbR^dmapsto mathbbR$ is Lebesque measurable by definition if
                          $$xin mathbbR^d $$
                          is measureable for all $ain mathbbR$. Equivilently you may use $leq, <$ or $geq$ instead of $>$. Therefor
                          $$ xin mathbbR^d = f(x) > 0 cupxin mathbbR^d $$






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$















                            0












                            0








                            0





                            $begingroup$

                            A function $f:mathbbR^dmapsto mathbbR$ is Lebesque measurable by definition if
                            $$xin mathbbR^d $$
                            is measureable for all $ain mathbbR$. Equivilently you may use $leq, <$ or $geq$ instead of $>$. Therefor
                            $$ xin mathbbR^d = f(x) > 0 cupxin mathbbR^d $$






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            A function $f:mathbbR^dmapsto mathbbR$ is Lebesque measurable by definition if
                            $$xin mathbbR^d $$
                            is measureable for all $ain mathbbR$. Equivilently you may use $leq, <$ or $geq$ instead of $>$. Therefor
                            $$ xin mathbbR^d = f(x) > 0 cupxin mathbbR^d $$







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered 8 hours ago









                            DaytonDayton

                            3361 silver badge13 bronze badges




                            3361 silver badge13 bronze badges



























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded
















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3287966%2fsupport-of-measurable-function-is-measurable%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                                Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                                Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її