How much damage does a magic stone cause when hurled from a sling?Does a slung Magic Stone have the same normal and long range as a mundane bullet?Does forced movement, as in Thunderwave, necessarily break a grapple?Is it possible to use Sneak Attack with the Magic Stone cantrip?Can a level 11 Warlock do 78 damage in one turn with Eldritch Blast and Magic Stone?How much health will a Life Cleric gain from Mass Healing WordIs the damage from the Magic Stone cantrip magical?Do temporary hit points from heroism accumulate?Are these homebrew weapon attack cantrips balanced?Is the homebrew weapon attack cantrip 'Blizzard Blow' balanced?Is the homebrew weapon attack cantrip 'Vampiric Assault' balanced?
Character Frequency in a String
Hold[Expression] (or similar) in InputField that truly holds the input unmodified
Other than a swing wing, what types of variable geometry have flown?
Spoken encryption
Why are angular mometum and angular velocity not necessarily parallel, but linear momentum and linear velocity are always parallel?
USA: Can a witness take the 5th to avoid perjury?
Where to place an artificial gland in the human body?
Why did NASA use U.S customary units?
How do campaign rallies gain candidates votes?
What does the minus sign mean in measurements in datasheet footprint drawings?
Grid/table with lots of buttons
Is the apartment I want to rent a scam?
How can I make sure my players' decisions have consequences?
Very basic singly linked list
How do I run a game when my PCs have different approaches to combat?
Closet Wall, is it Load Bearing?
Marketing Cloud Query Activity is not pulling in data for newly added fields to target Data Extension
How can I prevent corporations from growing their own workforce?
Why do websites not use the HaveIBeenPwned API to warn users about exposed passwords?
What is the life span of a Flerken?
What should I say when a company asks you why someone (a friend) who was fired left?
Explanation for a joke about a three-legged dog that walks into a bar
Using "Kollege" as "university friend"?
Monty Hall Problem with a Fallible Monty
How much damage does a magic stone cause when hurled from a sling?
Does a slung Magic Stone have the same normal and long range as a mundane bullet?Does forced movement, as in Thunderwave, necessarily break a grapple?Is it possible to use Sneak Attack with the Magic Stone cantrip?Can a level 11 Warlock do 78 damage in one turn with Eldritch Blast and Magic Stone?How much health will a Life Cleric gain from Mass Healing WordIs the damage from the Magic Stone cantrip magical?Do temporary hit points from heroism accumulate?Are these homebrew weapon attack cantrips balanced?Is the homebrew weapon attack cantrip 'Blizzard Blow' balanced?Is the homebrew weapon attack cantrip 'Vampiric Assault' balanced?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
There appear to be two plausible interpretations.
- The magic stone’s effect amplifies and thereby replaces the regular damage of the stone hurled by the sling.
- The sling is hurling the stone at high velocity causing regular damage and the spells effect is that it causes it’s damage (additional).
Question
What damage dice are rolled when a creature is hit by a magic stone that was slung by a sling, and why?
Example: A Druid named Agar has +3 to his spellcasting ability modifier, he carries a sling and has already cast magic stones on a few pebble carried in his pocket.
In the distance, a goblin slowly crests a hill and comes into view.
Agar readies his sling as the goblin advances from about 100 feet away.
Agar slings a magic stone toward the goblin.
Before the goblin can react, he is struck by the stone.
Does the Goblin take 1d6+3 damage?
Does the Goblin take 1d4+1d6+3 damage?
Magic Stone
You touch one to three pebbles and imbue them with magic. You or
someone else can make a ranged spell attack with one of the pebbles by
throwing it or hurling it with a sling. If thrown, it has a range of
60 feet. If someone else attacks with the pebble, that attacker adds
your spellcasting ability modifier, not the attacker’s, to the attack
roll. On a hit, the target takes bludgeoning damage equal to 1d6 +
your spellcasting ability modifier. Hit or miss, the spell then ends
on the stone. If you cast this spell again, the spell ends early on
any pebbles still affected by it.
Sling
Sling, damage 1d4 blugeoning (PH, 149)
dnd-5e spells damage ranged-attack
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There appear to be two plausible interpretations.
- The magic stone’s effect amplifies and thereby replaces the regular damage of the stone hurled by the sling.
- The sling is hurling the stone at high velocity causing regular damage and the spells effect is that it causes it’s damage (additional).
Question
What damage dice are rolled when a creature is hit by a magic stone that was slung by a sling, and why?
Example: A Druid named Agar has +3 to his spellcasting ability modifier, he carries a sling and has already cast magic stones on a few pebble carried in his pocket.
In the distance, a goblin slowly crests a hill and comes into view.
Agar readies his sling as the goblin advances from about 100 feet away.
Agar slings a magic stone toward the goblin.
Before the goblin can react, he is struck by the stone.
Does the Goblin take 1d6+3 damage?
Does the Goblin take 1d4+1d6+3 damage?
Magic Stone
You touch one to three pebbles and imbue them with magic. You or
someone else can make a ranged spell attack with one of the pebbles by
throwing it or hurling it with a sling. If thrown, it has a range of
60 feet. If someone else attacks with the pebble, that attacker adds
your spellcasting ability modifier, not the attacker’s, to the attack
roll. On a hit, the target takes bludgeoning damage equal to 1d6 +
your spellcasting ability modifier. Hit or miss, the spell then ends
on the stone. If you cast this spell again, the spell ends early on
any pebbles still affected by it.
Sling
Sling, damage 1d4 blugeoning (PH, 149)
dnd-5e spells damage ranged-attack
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There appear to be two plausible interpretations.
- The magic stone’s effect amplifies and thereby replaces the regular damage of the stone hurled by the sling.
- The sling is hurling the stone at high velocity causing regular damage and the spells effect is that it causes it’s damage (additional).
Question
What damage dice are rolled when a creature is hit by a magic stone that was slung by a sling, and why?
Example: A Druid named Agar has +3 to his spellcasting ability modifier, he carries a sling and has already cast magic stones on a few pebble carried in his pocket.
In the distance, a goblin slowly crests a hill and comes into view.
Agar readies his sling as the goblin advances from about 100 feet away.
Agar slings a magic stone toward the goblin.
Before the goblin can react, he is struck by the stone.
Does the Goblin take 1d6+3 damage?
Does the Goblin take 1d4+1d6+3 damage?
Magic Stone
You touch one to three pebbles and imbue them with magic. You or
someone else can make a ranged spell attack with one of the pebbles by
throwing it or hurling it with a sling. If thrown, it has a range of
60 feet. If someone else attacks with the pebble, that attacker adds
your spellcasting ability modifier, not the attacker’s, to the attack
roll. On a hit, the target takes bludgeoning damage equal to 1d6 +
your spellcasting ability modifier. Hit or miss, the spell then ends
on the stone. If you cast this spell again, the spell ends early on
any pebbles still affected by it.
Sling
Sling, damage 1d4 blugeoning (PH, 149)
dnd-5e spells damage ranged-attack
$endgroup$
There appear to be two plausible interpretations.
- The magic stone’s effect amplifies and thereby replaces the regular damage of the stone hurled by the sling.
- The sling is hurling the stone at high velocity causing regular damage and the spells effect is that it causes it’s damage (additional).
Question
What damage dice are rolled when a creature is hit by a magic stone that was slung by a sling, and why?
Example: A Druid named Agar has +3 to his spellcasting ability modifier, he carries a sling and has already cast magic stones on a few pebble carried in his pocket.
In the distance, a goblin slowly crests a hill and comes into view.
Agar readies his sling as the goblin advances from about 100 feet away.
Agar slings a magic stone toward the goblin.
Before the goblin can react, he is struck by the stone.
Does the Goblin take 1d6+3 damage?
Does the Goblin take 1d4+1d6+3 damage?
Magic Stone
You touch one to three pebbles and imbue them with magic. You or
someone else can make a ranged spell attack with one of the pebbles by
throwing it or hurling it with a sling. If thrown, it has a range of
60 feet. If someone else attacks with the pebble, that attacker adds
your spellcasting ability modifier, not the attacker’s, to the attack
roll. On a hit, the target takes bludgeoning damage equal to 1d6 +
your spellcasting ability modifier. Hit or miss, the spell then ends
on the stone. If you cast this spell again, the spell ends early on
any pebbles still affected by it.
Sling
Sling, damage 1d4 blugeoning (PH, 149)
dnd-5e spells damage ranged-attack
dnd-5e spells damage ranged-attack
edited 9 hours ago
KorvinStarmast
91.6k22 gold badges303 silver badges491 bronze badges
91.6k22 gold badges303 silver badges491 bronze badges
asked 9 hours ago
Amethyst WizardAmethyst Wizard
5422 silver badges19 bronze badges
5422 silver badges19 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The magic stone always deals the same damage regardless of launching method
The relevant parts of the spell text are:
You or someone else can make a ranged spell attack with one of the pebbles by throwing it or hurling it with a sling. [...] On a hit, the target takes bludgeoning damage equal to 1d6 + your spellcasting ability modifier.
The normal damage of the sling is irrelevant, because you are not using it to make a weapon attack. Instead, you are making a ranged spell attack, which deals damage as described in the spell.
In your example, the damage will be 1d6+3.
What if I'm using a +1 magic sling?
A +1 weapon states:
You have a +1 bonus to attack and damage rolls made with this magic weapon.
Since this text doesn't limit the bonus to only weapon attacks, this +1 bonus applies to both the ranged spell attack roll and damage roll of a magic stone launched using the sling.
What if the target is more than 30 feet away?
The rules for the range weapon property say:
Range. A weapon that can be used to make a ranged attack has a range in parentheses after the ammunition or thrown property. The range lists two numbers. The first is the weapon's normal range in feet, and the second indicates the weapon's long range. When attacking a target beyond normal range, you have disadvantage on the attack roll. You can't attack a target beyond the weapon's long range.
As with the +1 weapon case, the rule for weapon range does not limit itself to only weapon attacks, so the disadvantage beyond the sling's normal range also applies when using the sling to make a ranged spell attack with the magic stone.
The same principles can be applied to any other questions about which properties of the sling apply to the magic stone attack and which ones don't: if the property applies only to weapon attacks, it is not relevant, but if it applies to all attacks made with the sling, it applies to the magic stone attack.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
RAW
Slings are a Simple Ranged Weapon (PHB 149) thus allowing a ranged attack. While using the magic stone in a sling after the spell been cast is considered a ranged spell attack (Elemental Evil Player's Companion , pg. 160).
You touch one to three pebbles and imbue them with magic. You or
someone else can make a ranged spell attack with one of the pebbles by
throwing it or hurling it with a sling
With D&D 5th edition rule that specific beats general (page 7). I would rule that the 1d6+spellcaster ability modifier would substitute for the normal sling damage as the normal ranged attack is converted to a ranged spell attack per the spell's description
Commentary
It would be a trade off using a sling versus being thrown. As the sling attack would be made at a disadvantage after 30 feet. While with throwing the magic stone by hand will allow a ranged spell attack out to 60 feet.
If thrown, it has a range of 60 feet.
The advantage of using a magic stone with a sling over throwing is to allow an attack with a disadvantaged ranged spell attack roll out to 120 feet.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
The rules say it is ranged spell attack is you "by throwing it or hurling it with a sling". You are still making the spell attack with the sling.
$endgroup$
– David Coffron
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Changed my answer to cover the sling information which I missed the first time around.
$endgroup$
– RS Conley
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Possibly of note is that the magic stone damage does not have to substitute out. You could still use the stone as a normal sling ammunition as it states "You or someone else can make a ranged spell attack..."
$endgroup$
– Medix2
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Medix2. The spell states shortly after that quote "If someone else attacks with the pebble, ". I have to conclude that anybody choosing to use a magic stone has no option but to make a ranged spell attack whether it is thrown or used in a sling. Without a statement explicitly mentioning adding in normal sling damage, the guidance of General versus specific means we have to substitute in what the spell says. What not substituted is the ammunition trait of (30/120)
$endgroup$
– RS Conley
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Ah I had assumed there was an implied "If somebody else attack with the pebble after having chosen to be making a ranged spell attack with it" but that makes sense as well, I may ask that as its own question
$endgroup$
– Medix2
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
1d6+3
As the spell states:
You... can make a ranged spell attack with one of the pebbles by... hurling it with a sling
When Agar performs the Readied action, he is performing that spell attack, and follows the rules that the spell describe:
On a hit, the target takes bludgeoning damage equal to 1d6 + your spellcasting ability modifier.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f152462%2fhow-much-damage-does-a-magic-stone-cause-when-hurled-from-a-sling%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The magic stone always deals the same damage regardless of launching method
The relevant parts of the spell text are:
You or someone else can make a ranged spell attack with one of the pebbles by throwing it or hurling it with a sling. [...] On a hit, the target takes bludgeoning damage equal to 1d6 + your spellcasting ability modifier.
The normal damage of the sling is irrelevant, because you are not using it to make a weapon attack. Instead, you are making a ranged spell attack, which deals damage as described in the spell.
In your example, the damage will be 1d6+3.
What if I'm using a +1 magic sling?
A +1 weapon states:
You have a +1 bonus to attack and damage rolls made with this magic weapon.
Since this text doesn't limit the bonus to only weapon attacks, this +1 bonus applies to both the ranged spell attack roll and damage roll of a magic stone launched using the sling.
What if the target is more than 30 feet away?
The rules for the range weapon property say:
Range. A weapon that can be used to make a ranged attack has a range in parentheses after the ammunition or thrown property. The range lists two numbers. The first is the weapon's normal range in feet, and the second indicates the weapon's long range. When attacking a target beyond normal range, you have disadvantage on the attack roll. You can't attack a target beyond the weapon's long range.
As with the +1 weapon case, the rule for weapon range does not limit itself to only weapon attacks, so the disadvantage beyond the sling's normal range also applies when using the sling to make a ranged spell attack with the magic stone.
The same principles can be applied to any other questions about which properties of the sling apply to the magic stone attack and which ones don't: if the property applies only to weapon attacks, it is not relevant, but if it applies to all attacks made with the sling, it applies to the magic stone attack.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The magic stone always deals the same damage regardless of launching method
The relevant parts of the spell text are:
You or someone else can make a ranged spell attack with one of the pebbles by throwing it or hurling it with a sling. [...] On a hit, the target takes bludgeoning damage equal to 1d6 + your spellcasting ability modifier.
The normal damage of the sling is irrelevant, because you are not using it to make a weapon attack. Instead, you are making a ranged spell attack, which deals damage as described in the spell.
In your example, the damage will be 1d6+3.
What if I'm using a +1 magic sling?
A +1 weapon states:
You have a +1 bonus to attack and damage rolls made with this magic weapon.
Since this text doesn't limit the bonus to only weapon attacks, this +1 bonus applies to both the ranged spell attack roll and damage roll of a magic stone launched using the sling.
What if the target is more than 30 feet away?
The rules for the range weapon property say:
Range. A weapon that can be used to make a ranged attack has a range in parentheses after the ammunition or thrown property. The range lists two numbers. The first is the weapon's normal range in feet, and the second indicates the weapon's long range. When attacking a target beyond normal range, you have disadvantage on the attack roll. You can't attack a target beyond the weapon's long range.
As with the +1 weapon case, the rule for weapon range does not limit itself to only weapon attacks, so the disadvantage beyond the sling's normal range also applies when using the sling to make a ranged spell attack with the magic stone.
The same principles can be applied to any other questions about which properties of the sling apply to the magic stone attack and which ones don't: if the property applies only to weapon attacks, it is not relevant, but if it applies to all attacks made with the sling, it applies to the magic stone attack.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The magic stone always deals the same damage regardless of launching method
The relevant parts of the spell text are:
You or someone else can make a ranged spell attack with one of the pebbles by throwing it or hurling it with a sling. [...] On a hit, the target takes bludgeoning damage equal to 1d6 + your spellcasting ability modifier.
The normal damage of the sling is irrelevant, because you are not using it to make a weapon attack. Instead, you are making a ranged spell attack, which deals damage as described in the spell.
In your example, the damage will be 1d6+3.
What if I'm using a +1 magic sling?
A +1 weapon states:
You have a +1 bonus to attack and damage rolls made with this magic weapon.
Since this text doesn't limit the bonus to only weapon attacks, this +1 bonus applies to both the ranged spell attack roll and damage roll of a magic stone launched using the sling.
What if the target is more than 30 feet away?
The rules for the range weapon property say:
Range. A weapon that can be used to make a ranged attack has a range in parentheses after the ammunition or thrown property. The range lists two numbers. The first is the weapon's normal range in feet, and the second indicates the weapon's long range. When attacking a target beyond normal range, you have disadvantage on the attack roll. You can't attack a target beyond the weapon's long range.
As with the +1 weapon case, the rule for weapon range does not limit itself to only weapon attacks, so the disadvantage beyond the sling's normal range also applies when using the sling to make a ranged spell attack with the magic stone.
The same principles can be applied to any other questions about which properties of the sling apply to the magic stone attack and which ones don't: if the property applies only to weapon attacks, it is not relevant, but if it applies to all attacks made with the sling, it applies to the magic stone attack.
$endgroup$
The magic stone always deals the same damage regardless of launching method
The relevant parts of the spell text are:
You or someone else can make a ranged spell attack with one of the pebbles by throwing it or hurling it with a sling. [...] On a hit, the target takes bludgeoning damage equal to 1d6 + your spellcasting ability modifier.
The normal damage of the sling is irrelevant, because you are not using it to make a weapon attack. Instead, you are making a ranged spell attack, which deals damage as described in the spell.
In your example, the damage will be 1d6+3.
What if I'm using a +1 magic sling?
A +1 weapon states:
You have a +1 bonus to attack and damage rolls made with this magic weapon.
Since this text doesn't limit the bonus to only weapon attacks, this +1 bonus applies to both the ranged spell attack roll and damage roll of a magic stone launched using the sling.
What if the target is more than 30 feet away?
The rules for the range weapon property say:
Range. A weapon that can be used to make a ranged attack has a range in parentheses after the ammunition or thrown property. The range lists two numbers. The first is the weapon's normal range in feet, and the second indicates the weapon's long range. When attacking a target beyond normal range, you have disadvantage on the attack roll. You can't attack a target beyond the weapon's long range.
As with the +1 weapon case, the rule for weapon range does not limit itself to only weapon attacks, so the disadvantage beyond the sling's normal range also applies when using the sling to make a ranged spell attack with the magic stone.
The same principles can be applied to any other questions about which properties of the sling apply to the magic stone attack and which ones don't: if the property applies only to weapon attacks, it is not relevant, but if it applies to all attacks made with the sling, it applies to the magic stone attack.
edited 8 hours ago
answered 9 hours ago
Ryan ThompsonRyan Thompson
16.9k2 gold badges57 silver badges120 bronze badges
16.9k2 gold badges57 silver badges120 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
RAW
Slings are a Simple Ranged Weapon (PHB 149) thus allowing a ranged attack. While using the magic stone in a sling after the spell been cast is considered a ranged spell attack (Elemental Evil Player's Companion , pg. 160).
You touch one to three pebbles and imbue them with magic. You or
someone else can make a ranged spell attack with one of the pebbles by
throwing it or hurling it with a sling
With D&D 5th edition rule that specific beats general (page 7). I would rule that the 1d6+spellcaster ability modifier would substitute for the normal sling damage as the normal ranged attack is converted to a ranged spell attack per the spell's description
Commentary
It would be a trade off using a sling versus being thrown. As the sling attack would be made at a disadvantage after 30 feet. While with throwing the magic stone by hand will allow a ranged spell attack out to 60 feet.
If thrown, it has a range of 60 feet.
The advantage of using a magic stone with a sling over throwing is to allow an attack with a disadvantaged ranged spell attack roll out to 120 feet.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
The rules say it is ranged spell attack is you "by throwing it or hurling it with a sling". You are still making the spell attack with the sling.
$endgroup$
– David Coffron
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Changed my answer to cover the sling information which I missed the first time around.
$endgroup$
– RS Conley
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Possibly of note is that the magic stone damage does not have to substitute out. You could still use the stone as a normal sling ammunition as it states "You or someone else can make a ranged spell attack..."
$endgroup$
– Medix2
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Medix2. The spell states shortly after that quote "If someone else attacks with the pebble, ". I have to conclude that anybody choosing to use a magic stone has no option but to make a ranged spell attack whether it is thrown or used in a sling. Without a statement explicitly mentioning adding in normal sling damage, the guidance of General versus specific means we have to substitute in what the spell says. What not substituted is the ammunition trait of (30/120)
$endgroup$
– RS Conley
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Ah I had assumed there was an implied "If somebody else attack with the pebble after having chosen to be making a ranged spell attack with it" but that makes sense as well, I may ask that as its own question
$endgroup$
– Medix2
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
RAW
Slings are a Simple Ranged Weapon (PHB 149) thus allowing a ranged attack. While using the magic stone in a sling after the spell been cast is considered a ranged spell attack (Elemental Evil Player's Companion , pg. 160).
You touch one to three pebbles and imbue them with magic. You or
someone else can make a ranged spell attack with one of the pebbles by
throwing it or hurling it with a sling
With D&D 5th edition rule that specific beats general (page 7). I would rule that the 1d6+spellcaster ability modifier would substitute for the normal sling damage as the normal ranged attack is converted to a ranged spell attack per the spell's description
Commentary
It would be a trade off using a sling versus being thrown. As the sling attack would be made at a disadvantage after 30 feet. While with throwing the magic stone by hand will allow a ranged spell attack out to 60 feet.
If thrown, it has a range of 60 feet.
The advantage of using a magic stone with a sling over throwing is to allow an attack with a disadvantaged ranged spell attack roll out to 120 feet.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
The rules say it is ranged spell attack is you "by throwing it or hurling it with a sling". You are still making the spell attack with the sling.
$endgroup$
– David Coffron
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Changed my answer to cover the sling information which I missed the first time around.
$endgroup$
– RS Conley
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Possibly of note is that the magic stone damage does not have to substitute out. You could still use the stone as a normal sling ammunition as it states "You or someone else can make a ranged spell attack..."
$endgroup$
– Medix2
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Medix2. The spell states shortly after that quote "If someone else attacks with the pebble, ". I have to conclude that anybody choosing to use a magic stone has no option but to make a ranged spell attack whether it is thrown or used in a sling. Without a statement explicitly mentioning adding in normal sling damage, the guidance of General versus specific means we have to substitute in what the spell says. What not substituted is the ammunition trait of (30/120)
$endgroup$
– RS Conley
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Ah I had assumed there was an implied "If somebody else attack with the pebble after having chosen to be making a ranged spell attack with it" but that makes sense as well, I may ask that as its own question
$endgroup$
– Medix2
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
RAW
Slings are a Simple Ranged Weapon (PHB 149) thus allowing a ranged attack. While using the magic stone in a sling after the spell been cast is considered a ranged spell attack (Elemental Evil Player's Companion , pg. 160).
You touch one to three pebbles and imbue them with magic. You or
someone else can make a ranged spell attack with one of the pebbles by
throwing it or hurling it with a sling
With D&D 5th edition rule that specific beats general (page 7). I would rule that the 1d6+spellcaster ability modifier would substitute for the normal sling damage as the normal ranged attack is converted to a ranged spell attack per the spell's description
Commentary
It would be a trade off using a sling versus being thrown. As the sling attack would be made at a disadvantage after 30 feet. While with throwing the magic stone by hand will allow a ranged spell attack out to 60 feet.
If thrown, it has a range of 60 feet.
The advantage of using a magic stone with a sling over throwing is to allow an attack with a disadvantaged ranged spell attack roll out to 120 feet.
$endgroup$
RAW
Slings are a Simple Ranged Weapon (PHB 149) thus allowing a ranged attack. While using the magic stone in a sling after the spell been cast is considered a ranged spell attack (Elemental Evil Player's Companion , pg. 160).
You touch one to three pebbles and imbue them with magic. You or
someone else can make a ranged spell attack with one of the pebbles by
throwing it or hurling it with a sling
With D&D 5th edition rule that specific beats general (page 7). I would rule that the 1d6+spellcaster ability modifier would substitute for the normal sling damage as the normal ranged attack is converted to a ranged spell attack per the spell's description
Commentary
It would be a trade off using a sling versus being thrown. As the sling attack would be made at a disadvantage after 30 feet. While with throwing the magic stone by hand will allow a ranged spell attack out to 60 feet.
If thrown, it has a range of 60 feet.
The advantage of using a magic stone with a sling over throwing is to allow an attack with a disadvantaged ranged spell attack roll out to 120 feet.
edited 9 hours ago
answered 9 hours ago
RS ConleyRS Conley
33.4k8 gold badges78 silver badges166 bronze badges
33.4k8 gold badges78 silver badges166 bronze badges
1
$begingroup$
The rules say it is ranged spell attack is you "by throwing it or hurling it with a sling". You are still making the spell attack with the sling.
$endgroup$
– David Coffron
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Changed my answer to cover the sling information which I missed the first time around.
$endgroup$
– RS Conley
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Possibly of note is that the magic stone damage does not have to substitute out. You could still use the stone as a normal sling ammunition as it states "You or someone else can make a ranged spell attack..."
$endgroup$
– Medix2
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Medix2. The spell states shortly after that quote "If someone else attacks with the pebble, ". I have to conclude that anybody choosing to use a magic stone has no option but to make a ranged spell attack whether it is thrown or used in a sling. Without a statement explicitly mentioning adding in normal sling damage, the guidance of General versus specific means we have to substitute in what the spell says. What not substituted is the ammunition trait of (30/120)
$endgroup$
– RS Conley
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Ah I had assumed there was an implied "If somebody else attack with the pebble after having chosen to be making a ranged spell attack with it" but that makes sense as well, I may ask that as its own question
$endgroup$
– Medix2
9 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
The rules say it is ranged spell attack is you "by throwing it or hurling it with a sling". You are still making the spell attack with the sling.
$endgroup$
– David Coffron
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Changed my answer to cover the sling information which I missed the first time around.
$endgroup$
– RS Conley
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Possibly of note is that the magic stone damage does not have to substitute out. You could still use the stone as a normal sling ammunition as it states "You or someone else can make a ranged spell attack..."
$endgroup$
– Medix2
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Medix2. The spell states shortly after that quote "If someone else attacks with the pebble, ". I have to conclude that anybody choosing to use a magic stone has no option but to make a ranged spell attack whether it is thrown or used in a sling. Without a statement explicitly mentioning adding in normal sling damage, the guidance of General versus specific means we have to substitute in what the spell says. What not substituted is the ammunition trait of (30/120)
$endgroup$
– RS Conley
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Ah I had assumed there was an implied "If somebody else attack with the pebble after having chosen to be making a ranged spell attack with it" but that makes sense as well, I may ask that as its own question
$endgroup$
– Medix2
9 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
The rules say it is ranged spell attack is you "by throwing it or hurling it with a sling". You are still making the spell attack with the sling.
$endgroup$
– David Coffron
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
The rules say it is ranged spell attack is you "by throwing it or hurling it with a sling". You are still making the spell attack with the sling.
$endgroup$
– David Coffron
9 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Changed my answer to cover the sling information which I missed the first time around.
$endgroup$
– RS Conley
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Changed my answer to cover the sling information which I missed the first time around.
$endgroup$
– RS Conley
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Possibly of note is that the magic stone damage does not have to substitute out. You could still use the stone as a normal sling ammunition as it states "You or someone else can make a ranged spell attack..."
$endgroup$
– Medix2
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Possibly of note is that the magic stone damage does not have to substitute out. You could still use the stone as a normal sling ammunition as it states "You or someone else can make a ranged spell attack..."
$endgroup$
– Medix2
9 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@Medix2. The spell states shortly after that quote "If someone else attacks with the pebble, ". I have to conclude that anybody choosing to use a magic stone has no option but to make a ranged spell attack whether it is thrown or used in a sling. Without a statement explicitly mentioning adding in normal sling damage, the guidance of General versus specific means we have to substitute in what the spell says. What not substituted is the ammunition trait of (30/120)
$endgroup$
– RS Conley
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Medix2. The spell states shortly after that quote "If someone else attacks with the pebble, ". I have to conclude that anybody choosing to use a magic stone has no option but to make a ranged spell attack whether it is thrown or used in a sling. Without a statement explicitly mentioning adding in normal sling damage, the guidance of General versus specific means we have to substitute in what the spell says. What not substituted is the ammunition trait of (30/120)
$endgroup$
– RS Conley
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Ah I had assumed there was an implied "If somebody else attack with the pebble after having chosen to be making a ranged spell attack with it" but that makes sense as well, I may ask that as its own question
$endgroup$
– Medix2
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Ah I had assumed there was an implied "If somebody else attack with the pebble after having chosen to be making a ranged spell attack with it" but that makes sense as well, I may ask that as its own question
$endgroup$
– Medix2
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
1d6+3
As the spell states:
You... can make a ranged spell attack with one of the pebbles by... hurling it with a sling
When Agar performs the Readied action, he is performing that spell attack, and follows the rules that the spell describe:
On a hit, the target takes bludgeoning damage equal to 1d6 + your spellcasting ability modifier.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
1d6+3
As the spell states:
You... can make a ranged spell attack with one of the pebbles by... hurling it with a sling
When Agar performs the Readied action, he is performing that spell attack, and follows the rules that the spell describe:
On a hit, the target takes bludgeoning damage equal to 1d6 + your spellcasting ability modifier.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
1d6+3
As the spell states:
You... can make a ranged spell attack with one of the pebbles by... hurling it with a sling
When Agar performs the Readied action, he is performing that spell attack, and follows the rules that the spell describe:
On a hit, the target takes bludgeoning damage equal to 1d6 + your spellcasting ability modifier.
$endgroup$
1d6+3
As the spell states:
You... can make a ranged spell attack with one of the pebbles by... hurling it with a sling
When Agar performs the Readied action, he is performing that spell attack, and follows the rules that the spell describe:
On a hit, the target takes bludgeoning damage equal to 1d6 + your spellcasting ability modifier.
answered 9 hours ago
David CoffronDavid Coffron
45.5k6 gold badges166 silver badges331 bronze badges
45.5k6 gold badges166 silver badges331 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f152462%2fhow-much-damage-does-a-magic-stone-cause-when-hurled-from-a-sling%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown