Capacitor with specific self-resonant frequency?What is the unit for resonant frequency?Resonant Frequency from Bode plotSelf resonance frequency for MLCC capacitorSelf resonant frequency of buck converterLDO regulator stability with bypass capacitorCapacitor Selection for TPS56221Can you filter out power supply noise by using a capacitor with a resonant frequency that matches the noise frequency?Why does a real world capacitor behave like an inductor at frequencies above its self-resonant frequency?LC circuit, resonant frequencyProblem with load switching at capacitor resonant frequency
I do not have power to all my breakers
Mathematica function equivalent to Matlab's residue function (partial fraction expansion)
Why aren't globular clusters disk shaped
Construct a pentagon avoiding compass use
Credit card stolen every 1-2 years. What am I doing wrong?
Will it hurt my career to work as a graphic designer in a startup for beauty and skin care?
What do mathematicians mean when they say some conjecture can’t be proven using the current technology?
Manually select/unselect lines before forwarding to stdout
Accidentally deleted python and yum is not working in centos7
Draw a line nicely around notes
Is this artwork (used in a video game) real?
I won USD 50K! Now what should I do with it?
Capacitor with specific self-resonant frequency?
How to honestly answer questions from a girlfriend like "How did you find this place" without giving the impression I'm always talking about my exes?
FPGA CPU's, how to find the max speed?
Sending a photo of my bank account card to the future employer
Can you perfectly wrap a cube with this blocky shape?
Getting fresh water in the middle of hypersaline lake in the Bronze Age
Why do legislative committees exist?
Why does the Trade Federation become so alarmed upon learning the ambassadors are Jedi Knights?
Video editor for YouTube
Why doesn't philosophy have higher standards for its arguments?
If I stood next to a piece of metal heated to a million degrees, but in a perfect vacuum, would I feel hot?
Cauchy reals and Dedekind reals satisfy "the same mathematical theorems"
Capacitor with specific self-resonant frequency?
What is the unit for resonant frequency?Resonant Frequency from Bode plotSelf resonance frequency for MLCC capacitorSelf resonant frequency of buck converterLDO regulator stability with bypass capacitorCapacitor Selection for TPS56221Can you filter out power supply noise by using a capacitor with a resonant frequency that matches the noise frequency?Why does a real world capacitor behave like an inductor at frequencies above its self-resonant frequency?LC circuit, resonant frequencyProblem with load switching at capacitor resonant frequency
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
I have a datasheet that calls for "a 15 pF capacitor with Self-Resonant Frequency in the 1800/1900 MHz range". It then recommends a capacitor (Murata GRM1555C1H150J) that (so far as I can tell) from the datasheet doesn't specify it's SRF.
I'd like to use a different, slightly larger SMT capacitor, but I understand this may lower (or just change) the SRF.
Mouser's part search engine doesn't include an SRF parameter. Is there some way to obtain capacitors with a specific SRF? Can the SRF be reliably derived in some way? Or does this property have to be measured?
capacitor frequency bypass-capacitor bypass
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a datasheet that calls for "a 15 pF capacitor with Self-Resonant Frequency in the 1800/1900 MHz range". It then recommends a capacitor (Murata GRM1555C1H150J) that (so far as I can tell) from the datasheet doesn't specify it's SRF.
I'd like to use a different, slightly larger SMT capacitor, but I understand this may lower (or just change) the SRF.
Mouser's part search engine doesn't include an SRF parameter. Is there some way to obtain capacitors with a specific SRF? Can the SRF be reliably derived in some way? Or does this property have to be measured?
capacitor frequency bypass-capacitor bypass
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a datasheet that calls for "a 15 pF capacitor with Self-Resonant Frequency in the 1800/1900 MHz range". It then recommends a capacitor (Murata GRM1555C1H150J) that (so far as I can tell) from the datasheet doesn't specify it's SRF.
I'd like to use a different, slightly larger SMT capacitor, but I understand this may lower (or just change) the SRF.
Mouser's part search engine doesn't include an SRF parameter. Is there some way to obtain capacitors with a specific SRF? Can the SRF be reliably derived in some way? Or does this property have to be measured?
capacitor frequency bypass-capacitor bypass
$endgroup$
I have a datasheet that calls for "a 15 pF capacitor with Self-Resonant Frequency in the 1800/1900 MHz range". It then recommends a capacitor (Murata GRM1555C1H150J) that (so far as I can tell) from the datasheet doesn't specify it's SRF.
I'd like to use a different, slightly larger SMT capacitor, but I understand this may lower (or just change) the SRF.
Mouser's part search engine doesn't include an SRF parameter. Is there some way to obtain capacitors with a specific SRF? Can the SRF be reliably derived in some way? Or does this property have to be measured?
capacitor frequency bypass-capacitor bypass
capacitor frequency bypass-capacitor bypass
edited 8 hours ago
laptop2d
34.1k12 gold badges40 silver badges101 bronze badges
34.1k12 gold badges40 silver badges101 bronze badges
asked 8 hours ago
Britton KerinBritton Kerin
161 bronze badge
161 bronze badge
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You need to use Murata Simsurfer (or the equivalent from another vendor) that provides the REAL datasheet (so-called tech-PDF in Murata's case) for the individual capacitor's detailed curves. That's where you will find the datasheet for the GRM1555C1H150J and its SRF:
What you are probably looking at right now is not the datasheet but the catalog where they cannot afford to actually list the datasheets for thousands of different capacitor with different combinations of capacitance, package, voltage, and dielectric.
Taken from Murata Tech-PDF for GRM1555C1H150J.
I think they are fairly representative from one manufacturer to the next though for a given dielectric and package size so if you can't find it for one dielectric in a package size, you might not find it for any manufacturer unless you change dieelectrics.
https://ds.murata.co.jp/simsurfing/mlcc.html?lcid=en-us
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
It is btw amazing that Murata does this, it's a great resource.
$endgroup$
– pipe
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Does every manufacturer do this? I assume they must somewhere but since it's so difficult/cumbersome to find it's the main reason I tend to stick with Murata.
$endgroup$
– DKNguyen
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
I've never seen it in such detail from any other manufacturer at least, maybe it's available on a case-by-case NDA basis for large customers or they expect customers to do their own testing.
$endgroup$
– pipe
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
How many customers can even afford to spend the time and equipment to buying and test every possible combination of capacitor? I guess only the ones big enough that spend enough money for them to actually care about. Ugh.
$endgroup$
– DKNguyen
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Most capacitor manufactures will list these parameters on their website which they have measured. Most of them will also provide spice models (use lt spice, it's free), s-parameter models and other tools to help you model the effects of parasitics at high frequencies.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Simsurfing web tool from Murata that @DKNguyen mentioned is my weapon of choice for problems like this. Other manufacturers may offer somewhat similar tools, but none as convenient as Murata's.
Addressing issues not yet mentioned in the other replies:
- the particular part that was recommended (GRM1555C1H150J - 0402 size) has SRF ~2.05GHz, a little higher than you're looking for. Besides, this part is not recommended for new designs. You're better off using the bigger 0603 part GRM1885C2E150JW07, with SRF ~1.75GHz.
- as a first order approximation, you may assume that the parasitic inductance is more or less constant for a given package size and dielectric. This way, if you know the SRF of a particular capacitance value, you can estimate the SRF for other capacitance values within the same series. I find it easier to use the tool interactively, though.
- the bigger the package, the bigger the parasitic inductance, and the lower the SRF; for really low inductance, high SRF, there are special packages with the pad side along the longest dimension of the package.
- unfortunately, the SRF always changes a little from manufacturer to manufacturer even for the same ceramic and package size. If SRF is really critical for your circuit, I recommend sticking to a single manufacturer.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
StackExchange.schematics.init();
);
, "cicuitlab");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f448481%2fcapacitor-with-specific-self-resonant-frequency%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You need to use Murata Simsurfer (or the equivalent from another vendor) that provides the REAL datasheet (so-called tech-PDF in Murata's case) for the individual capacitor's detailed curves. That's where you will find the datasheet for the GRM1555C1H150J and its SRF:
What you are probably looking at right now is not the datasheet but the catalog where they cannot afford to actually list the datasheets for thousands of different capacitor with different combinations of capacitance, package, voltage, and dielectric.
Taken from Murata Tech-PDF for GRM1555C1H150J.
I think they are fairly representative from one manufacturer to the next though for a given dielectric and package size so if you can't find it for one dielectric in a package size, you might not find it for any manufacturer unless you change dieelectrics.
https://ds.murata.co.jp/simsurfing/mlcc.html?lcid=en-us
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
It is btw amazing that Murata does this, it's a great resource.
$endgroup$
– pipe
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Does every manufacturer do this? I assume they must somewhere but since it's so difficult/cumbersome to find it's the main reason I tend to stick with Murata.
$endgroup$
– DKNguyen
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
I've never seen it in such detail from any other manufacturer at least, maybe it's available on a case-by-case NDA basis for large customers or they expect customers to do their own testing.
$endgroup$
– pipe
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
How many customers can even afford to spend the time and equipment to buying and test every possible combination of capacitor? I guess only the ones big enough that spend enough money for them to actually care about. Ugh.
$endgroup$
– DKNguyen
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You need to use Murata Simsurfer (or the equivalent from another vendor) that provides the REAL datasheet (so-called tech-PDF in Murata's case) for the individual capacitor's detailed curves. That's where you will find the datasheet for the GRM1555C1H150J and its SRF:
What you are probably looking at right now is not the datasheet but the catalog where they cannot afford to actually list the datasheets for thousands of different capacitor with different combinations of capacitance, package, voltage, and dielectric.
Taken from Murata Tech-PDF for GRM1555C1H150J.
I think they are fairly representative from one manufacturer to the next though for a given dielectric and package size so if you can't find it for one dielectric in a package size, you might not find it for any manufacturer unless you change dieelectrics.
https://ds.murata.co.jp/simsurfing/mlcc.html?lcid=en-us
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
It is btw amazing that Murata does this, it's a great resource.
$endgroup$
– pipe
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Does every manufacturer do this? I assume they must somewhere but since it's so difficult/cumbersome to find it's the main reason I tend to stick with Murata.
$endgroup$
– DKNguyen
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
I've never seen it in such detail from any other manufacturer at least, maybe it's available on a case-by-case NDA basis for large customers or they expect customers to do their own testing.
$endgroup$
– pipe
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
How many customers can even afford to spend the time and equipment to buying and test every possible combination of capacitor? I guess only the ones big enough that spend enough money for them to actually care about. Ugh.
$endgroup$
– DKNguyen
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You need to use Murata Simsurfer (or the equivalent from another vendor) that provides the REAL datasheet (so-called tech-PDF in Murata's case) for the individual capacitor's detailed curves. That's where you will find the datasheet for the GRM1555C1H150J and its SRF:
What you are probably looking at right now is not the datasheet but the catalog where they cannot afford to actually list the datasheets for thousands of different capacitor with different combinations of capacitance, package, voltage, and dielectric.
Taken from Murata Tech-PDF for GRM1555C1H150J.
I think they are fairly representative from one manufacturer to the next though for a given dielectric and package size so if you can't find it for one dielectric in a package size, you might not find it for any manufacturer unless you change dieelectrics.
https://ds.murata.co.jp/simsurfing/mlcc.html?lcid=en-us
$endgroup$
You need to use Murata Simsurfer (or the equivalent from another vendor) that provides the REAL datasheet (so-called tech-PDF in Murata's case) for the individual capacitor's detailed curves. That's where you will find the datasheet for the GRM1555C1H150J and its SRF:
What you are probably looking at right now is not the datasheet but the catalog where they cannot afford to actually list the datasheets for thousands of different capacitor with different combinations of capacitance, package, voltage, and dielectric.
Taken from Murata Tech-PDF for GRM1555C1H150J.
I think they are fairly representative from one manufacturer to the next though for a given dielectric and package size so if you can't find it for one dielectric in a package size, you might not find it for any manufacturer unless you change dieelectrics.
https://ds.murata.co.jp/simsurfing/mlcc.html?lcid=en-us
edited 8 hours ago
answered 8 hours ago
DKNguyenDKNguyen
4,5471 gold badge5 silver badges23 bronze badges
4,5471 gold badge5 silver badges23 bronze badges
$begingroup$
It is btw amazing that Murata does this, it's a great resource.
$endgroup$
– pipe
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Does every manufacturer do this? I assume they must somewhere but since it's so difficult/cumbersome to find it's the main reason I tend to stick with Murata.
$endgroup$
– DKNguyen
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
I've never seen it in such detail from any other manufacturer at least, maybe it's available on a case-by-case NDA basis for large customers or they expect customers to do their own testing.
$endgroup$
– pipe
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
How many customers can even afford to spend the time and equipment to buying and test every possible combination of capacitor? I guess only the ones big enough that spend enough money for them to actually care about. Ugh.
$endgroup$
– DKNguyen
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is btw amazing that Murata does this, it's a great resource.
$endgroup$
– pipe
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Does every manufacturer do this? I assume they must somewhere but since it's so difficult/cumbersome to find it's the main reason I tend to stick with Murata.
$endgroup$
– DKNguyen
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
I've never seen it in such detail from any other manufacturer at least, maybe it's available on a case-by-case NDA basis for large customers or they expect customers to do their own testing.
$endgroup$
– pipe
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
How many customers can even afford to spend the time and equipment to buying and test every possible combination of capacitor? I guess only the ones big enough that spend enough money for them to actually care about. Ugh.
$endgroup$
– DKNguyen
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
It is btw amazing that Murata does this, it's a great resource.
$endgroup$
– pipe
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
It is btw amazing that Murata does this, it's a great resource.
$endgroup$
– pipe
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Does every manufacturer do this? I assume they must somewhere but since it's so difficult/cumbersome to find it's the main reason I tend to stick with Murata.
$endgroup$
– DKNguyen
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Does every manufacturer do this? I assume they must somewhere but since it's so difficult/cumbersome to find it's the main reason I tend to stick with Murata.
$endgroup$
– DKNguyen
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
I've never seen it in such detail from any other manufacturer at least, maybe it's available on a case-by-case NDA basis for large customers or they expect customers to do their own testing.
$endgroup$
– pipe
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
I've never seen it in such detail from any other manufacturer at least, maybe it's available on a case-by-case NDA basis for large customers or they expect customers to do their own testing.
$endgroup$
– pipe
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
How many customers can even afford to spend the time and equipment to buying and test every possible combination of capacitor? I guess only the ones big enough that spend enough money for them to actually care about. Ugh.
$endgroup$
– DKNguyen
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
How many customers can even afford to spend the time and equipment to buying and test every possible combination of capacitor? I guess only the ones big enough that spend enough money for them to actually care about. Ugh.
$endgroup$
– DKNguyen
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Most capacitor manufactures will list these parameters on their website which they have measured. Most of them will also provide spice models (use lt spice, it's free), s-parameter models and other tools to help you model the effects of parasitics at high frequencies.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Most capacitor manufactures will list these parameters on their website which they have measured. Most of them will also provide spice models (use lt spice, it's free), s-parameter models and other tools to help you model the effects of parasitics at high frequencies.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Most capacitor manufactures will list these parameters on their website which they have measured. Most of them will also provide spice models (use lt spice, it's free), s-parameter models and other tools to help you model the effects of parasitics at high frequencies.
$endgroup$
Most capacitor manufactures will list these parameters on their website which they have measured. Most of them will also provide spice models (use lt spice, it's free), s-parameter models and other tools to help you model the effects of parasitics at high frequencies.
answered 8 hours ago
laptop2dlaptop2d
34.1k12 gold badges40 silver badges101 bronze badges
34.1k12 gold badges40 silver badges101 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Simsurfing web tool from Murata that @DKNguyen mentioned is my weapon of choice for problems like this. Other manufacturers may offer somewhat similar tools, but none as convenient as Murata's.
Addressing issues not yet mentioned in the other replies:
- the particular part that was recommended (GRM1555C1H150J - 0402 size) has SRF ~2.05GHz, a little higher than you're looking for. Besides, this part is not recommended for new designs. You're better off using the bigger 0603 part GRM1885C2E150JW07, with SRF ~1.75GHz.
- as a first order approximation, you may assume that the parasitic inductance is more or less constant for a given package size and dielectric. This way, if you know the SRF of a particular capacitance value, you can estimate the SRF for other capacitance values within the same series. I find it easier to use the tool interactively, though.
- the bigger the package, the bigger the parasitic inductance, and the lower the SRF; for really low inductance, high SRF, there are special packages with the pad side along the longest dimension of the package.
- unfortunately, the SRF always changes a little from manufacturer to manufacturer even for the same ceramic and package size. If SRF is really critical for your circuit, I recommend sticking to a single manufacturer.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Simsurfing web tool from Murata that @DKNguyen mentioned is my weapon of choice for problems like this. Other manufacturers may offer somewhat similar tools, but none as convenient as Murata's.
Addressing issues not yet mentioned in the other replies:
- the particular part that was recommended (GRM1555C1H150J - 0402 size) has SRF ~2.05GHz, a little higher than you're looking for. Besides, this part is not recommended for new designs. You're better off using the bigger 0603 part GRM1885C2E150JW07, with SRF ~1.75GHz.
- as a first order approximation, you may assume that the parasitic inductance is more or less constant for a given package size and dielectric. This way, if you know the SRF of a particular capacitance value, you can estimate the SRF for other capacitance values within the same series. I find it easier to use the tool interactively, though.
- the bigger the package, the bigger the parasitic inductance, and the lower the SRF; for really low inductance, high SRF, there are special packages with the pad side along the longest dimension of the package.
- unfortunately, the SRF always changes a little from manufacturer to manufacturer even for the same ceramic and package size. If SRF is really critical for your circuit, I recommend sticking to a single manufacturer.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Simsurfing web tool from Murata that @DKNguyen mentioned is my weapon of choice for problems like this. Other manufacturers may offer somewhat similar tools, but none as convenient as Murata's.
Addressing issues not yet mentioned in the other replies:
- the particular part that was recommended (GRM1555C1H150J - 0402 size) has SRF ~2.05GHz, a little higher than you're looking for. Besides, this part is not recommended for new designs. You're better off using the bigger 0603 part GRM1885C2E150JW07, with SRF ~1.75GHz.
- as a first order approximation, you may assume that the parasitic inductance is more or less constant for a given package size and dielectric. This way, if you know the SRF of a particular capacitance value, you can estimate the SRF for other capacitance values within the same series. I find it easier to use the tool interactively, though.
- the bigger the package, the bigger the parasitic inductance, and the lower the SRF; for really low inductance, high SRF, there are special packages with the pad side along the longest dimension of the package.
- unfortunately, the SRF always changes a little from manufacturer to manufacturer even for the same ceramic and package size. If SRF is really critical for your circuit, I recommend sticking to a single manufacturer.
$endgroup$
The Simsurfing web tool from Murata that @DKNguyen mentioned is my weapon of choice for problems like this. Other manufacturers may offer somewhat similar tools, but none as convenient as Murata's.
Addressing issues not yet mentioned in the other replies:
- the particular part that was recommended (GRM1555C1H150J - 0402 size) has SRF ~2.05GHz, a little higher than you're looking for. Besides, this part is not recommended for new designs. You're better off using the bigger 0603 part GRM1885C2E150JW07, with SRF ~1.75GHz.
- as a first order approximation, you may assume that the parasitic inductance is more or less constant for a given package size and dielectric. This way, if you know the SRF of a particular capacitance value, you can estimate the SRF for other capacitance values within the same series. I find it easier to use the tool interactively, though.
- the bigger the package, the bigger the parasitic inductance, and the lower the SRF; for really low inductance, high SRF, there are special packages with the pad side along the longest dimension of the package.
- unfortunately, the SRF always changes a little from manufacturer to manufacturer even for the same ceramic and package size. If SRF is really critical for your circuit, I recommend sticking to a single manufacturer.
answered 2 hours ago
joribamajoribama
9311 silver badge11 bronze badges
9311 silver badge11 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f448481%2fcapacitor-with-specific-self-resonant-frequency%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown