Which is better for keeping data primary partition or logical partition?Is it possible to move Ubuntu on a primary partition to a logical/extended partition?is it a good idea to change a recovery partition from primary to logical? [HP laptop]Removing extended partition without deleting logical in itCan not create logical partition on an external HDDConverting C:/ partition to Logical PartitionMake primary partition from unallocated space from extended partitionHow to change ext4 primary partition to logicalMerge extended partitions keeping logical partitions intactBasic Disk and Dynamic Disk vs. Primary Partition and Extended Partition and Logical PartitionUnable to convert logical partition to primary or create create a new primary partition
Using a concentration spell on top of another spell from another spell list?
Integral from infinity to infinity
What could a reptilian race tell by candling their eggs?
How to answer "write something on the board"?
Why was Mal so quick to drop Bester in favour of Kaylee?
Can Aziraphale and Crowley actually become native?
Can an editor review manuscript without sending to reviewers?
What game is this character in the Pixels movie from?
Graph problems as integer programs
Why is Japan trying to have a better relationship with Iran?
What's the easiest way for a whole party to be able to communicate with a creature that doesn't know Common?
Can the Raspberry Pi 4 better distribute Python scripts to all four cores?
Ordered list of OR journals
Is there reliable evidence that depleted uranium from the 1999 NATO bombing is causing cancer in Serbia?
Golf the smallest circle!
I hit a pipe with a mower and now it won't turn
Adjective for 'made of pus' or 'corrupted by pus' or something of something of pus
Step into the Octagram
In native German words, is Q always followed by U, as in English?
Can you actually break an FPGA by programming it wrong?
Prime parity peregrination
Can a function nowhere continuous have a connected graph?
Is there a legal way for US presidents to extend their terms beyond four years?
For decoupling an IC's power supply pins, is there any reason to use multiple capacitances when all the MLCCs have the same package size?
Which is better for keeping data primary partition or logical partition?
Is it possible to move Ubuntu on a primary partition to a logical/extended partition?is it a good idea to change a recovery partition from primary to logical? [HP laptop]Removing extended partition without deleting logical in itCan not create logical partition on an external HDDConverting C:/ partition to Logical PartitionMake primary partition from unallocated space from extended partitionHow to change ext4 primary partition to logicalMerge extended partitions keeping logical partitions intactBasic Disk and Dynamic Disk vs. Primary Partition and Extended Partition and Logical PartitionUnable to convert logical partition to primary or create create a new primary partition
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
We have two options;
a. creating a primary partition (say D:) or
b. creating an extended partition, then create a logical partition (say D:) in the extended partition
In terms of data security, data loss or anything else, is there any difference, if we keep data in primary partition or if we keep data in logical partition?
Regards
FewL
hard-drive partitioning
add a comment |
We have two options;
a. creating a primary partition (say D:) or
b. creating an extended partition, then create a logical partition (say D:) in the extended partition
In terms of data security, data loss or anything else, is there any difference, if we keep data in primary partition or if we keep data in logical partition?
Regards
FewL
hard-drive partitioning
Are you using the primary partition to install the operating system?
– Nimesh Neema
10 hours ago
add a comment |
We have two options;
a. creating a primary partition (say D:) or
b. creating an extended partition, then create a logical partition (say D:) in the extended partition
In terms of data security, data loss or anything else, is there any difference, if we keep data in primary partition or if we keep data in logical partition?
Regards
FewL
hard-drive partitioning
We have two options;
a. creating a primary partition (say D:) or
b. creating an extended partition, then create a logical partition (say D:) in the extended partition
In terms of data security, data loss or anything else, is there any difference, if we keep data in primary partition or if we keep data in logical partition?
Regards
FewL
hard-drive partitioning
hard-drive partitioning
edited 10 hours ago
Tetsujin
17.4k5 gold badges39 silver badges65 bronze badges
17.4k5 gold badges39 silver badges65 bronze badges
asked 10 hours ago
user725162user725162
493 bronze badges
493 bronze badges
Are you using the primary partition to install the operating system?
– Nimesh Neema
10 hours ago
add a comment |
Are you using the primary partition to install the operating system?
– Nimesh Neema
10 hours ago
Are you using the primary partition to install the operating system?
– Nimesh Neema
10 hours ago
Are you using the primary partition to install the operating system?
– Nimesh Neema
10 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
If you are using a Logical Partition in an Extended Partition, then you are using the old-fashioned MBR Partition Tables which are limited to drives of 2TB or less. The current standard for Windows 10 is GPT Partition Tables which arrived with EFI and UEFI Booting. One poster tested and found better performance with GPT, and GPT has additional features which help protect your data better, transparantly. Microsoft has provided an article on conversion.
Therefore, storing your data on an MBR partitioned drive is less safe than a GPT partitioned drive, but Tetsujin's also very right, and I voted for his answer.
add a comment |
No difference whatsoever.
For data loss-prevention, your only security is to never keep only one copy of anything.
There's an adage...
"Any data not stored in at lest three distinct locations ought to be considered temporary."
In short, that means one on-site backup & one off-site backup [in case the house burns down.]
Having all your eggs in one basket... it doesn't matter if you have two baskets, if you're carrying them both in the same hand.
Assuming data is 'safe' because it's on a different partition on the same physical drive, no matter how you format it, is 'all eggs in one basket'.
I observed tech steps followed by two tech guys. Windows 10 was installed in C: Using diskpart, extended partition was created, then a logical partition (D:) was created in extended partition. Both tech guys preferred to keep data in logical partition. I couldn’t understand why.
– user725162
9 hours ago
1
It's an old [& ultimately pointless] method to 'protect' your data in case you ever have to reinstall the OS. I honestly wouldn't bother with it, it offers no real protection from anything.
– Tetsujin
9 hours ago
1
@user725162, the reason may have nothing to do with security. As K7AAY describes, extended and logical partitions are used with MBR. MBR supports a maximum of 4 primary partitions. Using one of those for an extended partition allows you to exceed the limit by using logical partitions. When you start using recovery and other dedicated partitions, it's easy to use up the allowance of 4.
– fixer1234
6 hours ago
add a comment |
When creating a second partition for data storage (i.e., not the boot partition) for an OS, the primary difference here is that it may affect your ability to create more partitions later.
There are four primary partition slots on an MBR-formatted drive. One of these may be used to create/hold an extended partition, which in turn allows additional partitions on the drive that do not use any of the remaining three primary partition slots in the MBR.
If all four primary partition slots are allocated to primary partitions, it's no longer possible to add an extended partition and thus you can add no more partitions to that drive, even if you have free space. Therefore it's standard practice, when creating the first partition for which an extended partition slot can be used, to create it as an extended partition. This ensures that further additions can never run out of partition slots.
Some older or less sophisticated boot programs may not be able to boot from an extended partition but only from a primary one, so it's also good practice not to use a primary slot for a partition you know you will never want to boot, leaving it free in case you later need another bootable partition.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1452819%2fwhich-is-better-for-keeping-data-primary-partition-or-logical-partition%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
If you are using a Logical Partition in an Extended Partition, then you are using the old-fashioned MBR Partition Tables which are limited to drives of 2TB or less. The current standard for Windows 10 is GPT Partition Tables which arrived with EFI and UEFI Booting. One poster tested and found better performance with GPT, and GPT has additional features which help protect your data better, transparantly. Microsoft has provided an article on conversion.
Therefore, storing your data on an MBR partitioned drive is less safe than a GPT partitioned drive, but Tetsujin's also very right, and I voted for his answer.
add a comment |
If you are using a Logical Partition in an Extended Partition, then you are using the old-fashioned MBR Partition Tables which are limited to drives of 2TB or less. The current standard for Windows 10 is GPT Partition Tables which arrived with EFI and UEFI Booting. One poster tested and found better performance with GPT, and GPT has additional features which help protect your data better, transparantly. Microsoft has provided an article on conversion.
Therefore, storing your data on an MBR partitioned drive is less safe than a GPT partitioned drive, but Tetsujin's also very right, and I voted for his answer.
add a comment |
If you are using a Logical Partition in an Extended Partition, then you are using the old-fashioned MBR Partition Tables which are limited to drives of 2TB or less. The current standard for Windows 10 is GPT Partition Tables which arrived with EFI and UEFI Booting. One poster tested and found better performance with GPT, and GPT has additional features which help protect your data better, transparantly. Microsoft has provided an article on conversion.
Therefore, storing your data on an MBR partitioned drive is less safe than a GPT partitioned drive, but Tetsujin's also very right, and I voted for his answer.
If you are using a Logical Partition in an Extended Partition, then you are using the old-fashioned MBR Partition Tables which are limited to drives of 2TB or less. The current standard for Windows 10 is GPT Partition Tables which arrived with EFI and UEFI Booting. One poster tested and found better performance with GPT, and GPT has additional features which help protect your data better, transparantly. Microsoft has provided an article on conversion.
Therefore, storing your data on an MBR partitioned drive is less safe than a GPT partitioned drive, but Tetsujin's also very right, and I voted for his answer.
answered 9 hours ago
K7AAYK7AAY
4,2042 gold badges16 silver badges41 bronze badges
4,2042 gold badges16 silver badges41 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
No difference whatsoever.
For data loss-prevention, your only security is to never keep only one copy of anything.
There's an adage...
"Any data not stored in at lest three distinct locations ought to be considered temporary."
In short, that means one on-site backup & one off-site backup [in case the house burns down.]
Having all your eggs in one basket... it doesn't matter if you have two baskets, if you're carrying them both in the same hand.
Assuming data is 'safe' because it's on a different partition on the same physical drive, no matter how you format it, is 'all eggs in one basket'.
I observed tech steps followed by two tech guys. Windows 10 was installed in C: Using diskpart, extended partition was created, then a logical partition (D:) was created in extended partition. Both tech guys preferred to keep data in logical partition. I couldn’t understand why.
– user725162
9 hours ago
1
It's an old [& ultimately pointless] method to 'protect' your data in case you ever have to reinstall the OS. I honestly wouldn't bother with it, it offers no real protection from anything.
– Tetsujin
9 hours ago
1
@user725162, the reason may have nothing to do with security. As K7AAY describes, extended and logical partitions are used with MBR. MBR supports a maximum of 4 primary partitions. Using one of those for an extended partition allows you to exceed the limit by using logical partitions. When you start using recovery and other dedicated partitions, it's easy to use up the allowance of 4.
– fixer1234
6 hours ago
add a comment |
No difference whatsoever.
For data loss-prevention, your only security is to never keep only one copy of anything.
There's an adage...
"Any data not stored in at lest three distinct locations ought to be considered temporary."
In short, that means one on-site backup & one off-site backup [in case the house burns down.]
Having all your eggs in one basket... it doesn't matter if you have two baskets, if you're carrying them both in the same hand.
Assuming data is 'safe' because it's on a different partition on the same physical drive, no matter how you format it, is 'all eggs in one basket'.
I observed tech steps followed by two tech guys. Windows 10 was installed in C: Using diskpart, extended partition was created, then a logical partition (D:) was created in extended partition. Both tech guys preferred to keep data in logical partition. I couldn’t understand why.
– user725162
9 hours ago
1
It's an old [& ultimately pointless] method to 'protect' your data in case you ever have to reinstall the OS. I honestly wouldn't bother with it, it offers no real protection from anything.
– Tetsujin
9 hours ago
1
@user725162, the reason may have nothing to do with security. As K7AAY describes, extended and logical partitions are used with MBR. MBR supports a maximum of 4 primary partitions. Using one of those for an extended partition allows you to exceed the limit by using logical partitions. When you start using recovery and other dedicated partitions, it's easy to use up the allowance of 4.
– fixer1234
6 hours ago
add a comment |
No difference whatsoever.
For data loss-prevention, your only security is to never keep only one copy of anything.
There's an adage...
"Any data not stored in at lest three distinct locations ought to be considered temporary."
In short, that means one on-site backup & one off-site backup [in case the house burns down.]
Having all your eggs in one basket... it doesn't matter if you have two baskets, if you're carrying them both in the same hand.
Assuming data is 'safe' because it's on a different partition on the same physical drive, no matter how you format it, is 'all eggs in one basket'.
No difference whatsoever.
For data loss-prevention, your only security is to never keep only one copy of anything.
There's an adage...
"Any data not stored in at lest three distinct locations ought to be considered temporary."
In short, that means one on-site backup & one off-site backup [in case the house burns down.]
Having all your eggs in one basket... it doesn't matter if you have two baskets, if you're carrying them both in the same hand.
Assuming data is 'safe' because it's on a different partition on the same physical drive, no matter how you format it, is 'all eggs in one basket'.
answered 10 hours ago
TetsujinTetsujin
17.4k5 gold badges39 silver badges65 bronze badges
17.4k5 gold badges39 silver badges65 bronze badges
I observed tech steps followed by two tech guys. Windows 10 was installed in C: Using diskpart, extended partition was created, then a logical partition (D:) was created in extended partition. Both tech guys preferred to keep data in logical partition. I couldn’t understand why.
– user725162
9 hours ago
1
It's an old [& ultimately pointless] method to 'protect' your data in case you ever have to reinstall the OS. I honestly wouldn't bother with it, it offers no real protection from anything.
– Tetsujin
9 hours ago
1
@user725162, the reason may have nothing to do with security. As K7AAY describes, extended and logical partitions are used with MBR. MBR supports a maximum of 4 primary partitions. Using one of those for an extended partition allows you to exceed the limit by using logical partitions. When you start using recovery and other dedicated partitions, it's easy to use up the allowance of 4.
– fixer1234
6 hours ago
add a comment |
I observed tech steps followed by two tech guys. Windows 10 was installed in C: Using diskpart, extended partition was created, then a logical partition (D:) was created in extended partition. Both tech guys preferred to keep data in logical partition. I couldn’t understand why.
– user725162
9 hours ago
1
It's an old [& ultimately pointless] method to 'protect' your data in case you ever have to reinstall the OS. I honestly wouldn't bother with it, it offers no real protection from anything.
– Tetsujin
9 hours ago
1
@user725162, the reason may have nothing to do with security. As K7AAY describes, extended and logical partitions are used with MBR. MBR supports a maximum of 4 primary partitions. Using one of those for an extended partition allows you to exceed the limit by using logical partitions. When you start using recovery and other dedicated partitions, it's easy to use up the allowance of 4.
– fixer1234
6 hours ago
I observed tech steps followed by two tech guys. Windows 10 was installed in C: Using diskpart, extended partition was created, then a logical partition (D:) was created in extended partition. Both tech guys preferred to keep data in logical partition. I couldn’t understand why.
– user725162
9 hours ago
I observed tech steps followed by two tech guys. Windows 10 was installed in C: Using diskpart, extended partition was created, then a logical partition (D:) was created in extended partition. Both tech guys preferred to keep data in logical partition. I couldn’t understand why.
– user725162
9 hours ago
1
1
It's an old [& ultimately pointless] method to 'protect' your data in case you ever have to reinstall the OS. I honestly wouldn't bother with it, it offers no real protection from anything.
– Tetsujin
9 hours ago
It's an old [& ultimately pointless] method to 'protect' your data in case you ever have to reinstall the OS. I honestly wouldn't bother with it, it offers no real protection from anything.
– Tetsujin
9 hours ago
1
1
@user725162, the reason may have nothing to do with security. As K7AAY describes, extended and logical partitions are used with MBR. MBR supports a maximum of 4 primary partitions. Using one of those for an extended partition allows you to exceed the limit by using logical partitions. When you start using recovery and other dedicated partitions, it's easy to use up the allowance of 4.
– fixer1234
6 hours ago
@user725162, the reason may have nothing to do with security. As K7AAY describes, extended and logical partitions are used with MBR. MBR supports a maximum of 4 primary partitions. Using one of those for an extended partition allows you to exceed the limit by using logical partitions. When you start using recovery and other dedicated partitions, it's easy to use up the allowance of 4.
– fixer1234
6 hours ago
add a comment |
When creating a second partition for data storage (i.e., not the boot partition) for an OS, the primary difference here is that it may affect your ability to create more partitions later.
There are four primary partition slots on an MBR-formatted drive. One of these may be used to create/hold an extended partition, which in turn allows additional partitions on the drive that do not use any of the remaining three primary partition slots in the MBR.
If all four primary partition slots are allocated to primary partitions, it's no longer possible to add an extended partition and thus you can add no more partitions to that drive, even if you have free space. Therefore it's standard practice, when creating the first partition for which an extended partition slot can be used, to create it as an extended partition. This ensures that further additions can never run out of partition slots.
Some older or less sophisticated boot programs may not be able to boot from an extended partition but only from a primary one, so it's also good practice not to use a primary slot for a partition you know you will never want to boot, leaving it free in case you later need another bootable partition.
add a comment |
When creating a second partition for data storage (i.e., not the boot partition) for an OS, the primary difference here is that it may affect your ability to create more partitions later.
There are four primary partition slots on an MBR-formatted drive. One of these may be used to create/hold an extended partition, which in turn allows additional partitions on the drive that do not use any of the remaining three primary partition slots in the MBR.
If all four primary partition slots are allocated to primary partitions, it's no longer possible to add an extended partition and thus you can add no more partitions to that drive, even if you have free space. Therefore it's standard practice, when creating the first partition for which an extended partition slot can be used, to create it as an extended partition. This ensures that further additions can never run out of partition slots.
Some older or less sophisticated boot programs may not be able to boot from an extended partition but only from a primary one, so it's also good practice not to use a primary slot for a partition you know you will never want to boot, leaving it free in case you later need another bootable partition.
add a comment |
When creating a second partition for data storage (i.e., not the boot partition) for an OS, the primary difference here is that it may affect your ability to create more partitions later.
There are four primary partition slots on an MBR-formatted drive. One of these may be used to create/hold an extended partition, which in turn allows additional partitions on the drive that do not use any of the remaining three primary partition slots in the MBR.
If all four primary partition slots are allocated to primary partitions, it's no longer possible to add an extended partition and thus you can add no more partitions to that drive, even if you have free space. Therefore it's standard practice, when creating the first partition for which an extended partition slot can be used, to create it as an extended partition. This ensures that further additions can never run out of partition slots.
Some older or less sophisticated boot programs may not be able to boot from an extended partition but only from a primary one, so it's also good practice not to use a primary slot for a partition you know you will never want to boot, leaving it free in case you later need another bootable partition.
When creating a second partition for data storage (i.e., not the boot partition) for an OS, the primary difference here is that it may affect your ability to create more partitions later.
There are four primary partition slots on an MBR-formatted drive. One of these may be used to create/hold an extended partition, which in turn allows additional partitions on the drive that do not use any of the remaining three primary partition slots in the MBR.
If all four primary partition slots are allocated to primary partitions, it's no longer possible to add an extended partition and thus you can add no more partitions to that drive, even if you have free space. Therefore it's standard practice, when creating the first partition for which an extended partition slot can be used, to create it as an extended partition. This ensures that further additions can never run out of partition slots.
Some older or less sophisticated boot programs may not be able to boot from an extended partition but only from a primary one, so it's also good practice not to use a primary slot for a partition you know you will never want to boot, leaving it free in case you later need another bootable partition.
answered 30 mins ago
Curt J. SampsonCurt J. Sampson
2481 silver badge9 bronze badges
2481 silver badge9 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1452819%2fwhich-is-better-for-keeping-data-primary-partition-or-logical-partition%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Are you using the primary partition to install the operating system?
– Nimesh Neema
10 hours ago