Which is better for keeping data primary partition or logical partition?Is it possible to move Ubuntu on a primary partition to a logical/extended partition?is it a good idea to change a recovery partition from primary to logical? [HP laptop]Removing extended partition without deleting logical in itCan not create logical partition on an external HDDConverting C:/ partition to Logical PartitionMake primary partition from unallocated space from extended partitionHow to change ext4 primary partition to logicalMerge extended partitions keeping logical partitions intactBasic Disk and Dynamic Disk vs. Primary Partition and Extended Partition and Logical PartitionUnable to convert logical partition to primary or create create a new primary partition

Using a concentration spell on top of another spell from another spell list?

Integral from infinity to infinity

What could a reptilian race tell by candling their eggs?

How to answer "write something on the board"?

Why was Mal so quick to drop Bester in favour of Kaylee?

Can Aziraphale and Crowley actually become native?

Can an editor review manuscript without sending to reviewers?

What game is this character in the Pixels movie from?

Graph problems as integer programs

Why is Japan trying to have a better relationship with Iran?

What's the easiest way for a whole party to be able to communicate with a creature that doesn't know Common?

Can the Raspberry Pi 4 better distribute Python scripts to all four cores?

Ordered list of OR journals

Is there reliable evidence that depleted uranium from the 1999 NATO bombing is causing cancer in Serbia?

Golf the smallest circle!

I hit a pipe with a mower and now it won't turn

Adjective for 'made of pus' or 'corrupted by pus' or something of something of pus

Step into the Octagram

In native German words, is Q always followed by U, as in English?

Can you actually break an FPGA by programming it wrong?

Prime parity peregrination

Can a function nowhere continuous have a connected graph?

Is there a legal way for US presidents to extend their terms beyond four years?

For decoupling an IC's power supply pins, is there any reason to use multiple capacitances when all the MLCCs have the same package size?



Which is better for keeping data primary partition or logical partition?


Is it possible to move Ubuntu on a primary partition to a logical/extended partition?is it a good idea to change a recovery partition from primary to logical? [HP laptop]Removing extended partition without deleting logical in itCan not create logical partition on an external HDDConverting C:/ partition to Logical PartitionMake primary partition from unallocated space from extended partitionHow to change ext4 primary partition to logicalMerge extended partitions keeping logical partitions intactBasic Disk and Dynamic Disk vs. Primary Partition and Extended Partition and Logical PartitionUnable to convert logical partition to primary or create create a new primary partition






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








4















We have two options;



a. creating a primary partition (say D:) or



b. creating an extended partition, then create a logical partition (say D:) in the extended partition



In terms of data security, data loss or anything else, is there any difference, if we keep data in primary partition or if we keep data in logical partition?



Regards



FewL










share|improve this question
























  • Are you using the primary partition to install the operating system?

    – Nimesh Neema
    10 hours ago

















4















We have two options;



a. creating a primary partition (say D:) or



b. creating an extended partition, then create a logical partition (say D:) in the extended partition



In terms of data security, data loss or anything else, is there any difference, if we keep data in primary partition or if we keep data in logical partition?



Regards



FewL










share|improve this question
























  • Are you using the primary partition to install the operating system?

    – Nimesh Neema
    10 hours ago













4












4








4


1






We have two options;



a. creating a primary partition (say D:) or



b. creating an extended partition, then create a logical partition (say D:) in the extended partition



In terms of data security, data loss or anything else, is there any difference, if we keep data in primary partition or if we keep data in logical partition?



Regards



FewL










share|improve this question
















We have two options;



a. creating a primary partition (say D:) or



b. creating an extended partition, then create a logical partition (say D:) in the extended partition



In terms of data security, data loss or anything else, is there any difference, if we keep data in primary partition or if we keep data in logical partition?



Regards



FewL







hard-drive partitioning






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 10 hours ago









Tetsujin

17.4k5 gold badges39 silver badges65 bronze badges




17.4k5 gold badges39 silver badges65 bronze badges










asked 10 hours ago









user725162user725162

493 bronze badges




493 bronze badges












  • Are you using the primary partition to install the operating system?

    – Nimesh Neema
    10 hours ago

















  • Are you using the primary partition to install the operating system?

    – Nimesh Neema
    10 hours ago
















Are you using the primary partition to install the operating system?

– Nimesh Neema
10 hours ago





Are you using the primary partition to install the operating system?

– Nimesh Neema
10 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















5














If you are using a Logical Partition in an Extended Partition, then you are using the old-fashioned MBR Partition Tables which are limited to drives of 2TB or less. The current standard for Windows 10 is GPT Partition Tables which arrived with EFI and UEFI Booting. One poster tested and found better performance with GPT, and GPT has additional features which help protect your data better, transparantly. Microsoft has provided an article on conversion.



Therefore, storing your data on an MBR partitioned drive is less safe than a GPT partitioned drive, but Tetsujin's also very right, and I voted for his answer.






share|improve this answer






























    4














    No difference whatsoever.



    For data loss-prevention, your only security is to never keep only one copy of anything.

    There's an adage...




    "Any data not stored in at lest three distinct locations ought to be considered temporary."




    In short, that means one on-site backup & one off-site backup [in case the house burns down.]



    Having all your eggs in one basket... it doesn't matter if you have two baskets, if you're carrying them both in the same hand.

    Assuming data is 'safe' because it's on a different partition on the same physical drive, no matter how you format it, is 'all eggs in one basket'.






    share|improve this answer























    • I observed tech steps followed by two tech guys. Windows 10 was installed in C: Using diskpart, extended partition was created, then a logical partition (D:) was created in extended partition. Both tech guys preferred to keep data in logical partition. I couldn’t understand why.

      – user725162
      9 hours ago






    • 1





      It's an old [& ultimately pointless] method to 'protect' your data in case you ever have to reinstall the OS. I honestly wouldn't bother with it, it offers no real protection from anything.

      – Tetsujin
      9 hours ago






    • 1





      @user725162, the reason may have nothing to do with security. As K7AAY describes, extended and logical partitions are used with MBR. MBR supports a maximum of 4 primary partitions. Using one of those for an extended partition allows you to exceed the limit by using logical partitions. When you start using recovery and other dedicated partitions, it's easy to use up the allowance of 4.

      – fixer1234
      6 hours ago


















    0














    When creating a second partition for data storage (i.e., not the boot partition) for an OS, the primary difference here is that it may affect your ability to create more partitions later.



    There are four primary partition slots on an MBR-formatted drive. One of these may be used to create/hold an extended partition, which in turn allows additional partitions on the drive that do not use any of the remaining three primary partition slots in the MBR.



    If all four primary partition slots are allocated to primary partitions, it's no longer possible to add an extended partition and thus you can add no more partitions to that drive, even if you have free space. Therefore it's standard practice, when creating the first partition for which an extended partition slot can be used, to create it as an extended partition. This ensures that further additions can never run out of partition slots.



    Some older or less sophisticated boot programs may not be able to boot from an extended partition but only from a primary one, so it's also good practice not to use a primary slot for a partition you know you will never want to boot, leaving it free in case you later need another bootable partition.






    share|improve this answer

























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "3"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1452819%2fwhich-is-better-for-keeping-data-primary-partition-or-logical-partition%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      5














      If you are using a Logical Partition in an Extended Partition, then you are using the old-fashioned MBR Partition Tables which are limited to drives of 2TB or less. The current standard for Windows 10 is GPT Partition Tables which arrived with EFI and UEFI Booting. One poster tested and found better performance with GPT, and GPT has additional features which help protect your data better, transparantly. Microsoft has provided an article on conversion.



      Therefore, storing your data on an MBR partitioned drive is less safe than a GPT partitioned drive, but Tetsujin's also very right, and I voted for his answer.






      share|improve this answer



























        5














        If you are using a Logical Partition in an Extended Partition, then you are using the old-fashioned MBR Partition Tables which are limited to drives of 2TB or less. The current standard for Windows 10 is GPT Partition Tables which arrived with EFI and UEFI Booting. One poster tested and found better performance with GPT, and GPT has additional features which help protect your data better, transparantly. Microsoft has provided an article on conversion.



        Therefore, storing your data on an MBR partitioned drive is less safe than a GPT partitioned drive, but Tetsujin's also very right, and I voted for his answer.






        share|improve this answer

























          5












          5








          5







          If you are using a Logical Partition in an Extended Partition, then you are using the old-fashioned MBR Partition Tables which are limited to drives of 2TB or less. The current standard for Windows 10 is GPT Partition Tables which arrived with EFI and UEFI Booting. One poster tested and found better performance with GPT, and GPT has additional features which help protect your data better, transparantly. Microsoft has provided an article on conversion.



          Therefore, storing your data on an MBR partitioned drive is less safe than a GPT partitioned drive, but Tetsujin's also very right, and I voted for his answer.






          share|improve this answer













          If you are using a Logical Partition in an Extended Partition, then you are using the old-fashioned MBR Partition Tables which are limited to drives of 2TB or less. The current standard for Windows 10 is GPT Partition Tables which arrived with EFI and UEFI Booting. One poster tested and found better performance with GPT, and GPT has additional features which help protect your data better, transparantly. Microsoft has provided an article on conversion.



          Therefore, storing your data on an MBR partitioned drive is less safe than a GPT partitioned drive, but Tetsujin's also very right, and I voted for his answer.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 9 hours ago









          K7AAYK7AAY

          4,2042 gold badges16 silver badges41 bronze badges




          4,2042 gold badges16 silver badges41 bronze badges























              4














              No difference whatsoever.



              For data loss-prevention, your only security is to never keep only one copy of anything.

              There's an adage...




              "Any data not stored in at lest three distinct locations ought to be considered temporary."




              In short, that means one on-site backup & one off-site backup [in case the house burns down.]



              Having all your eggs in one basket... it doesn't matter if you have two baskets, if you're carrying them both in the same hand.

              Assuming data is 'safe' because it's on a different partition on the same physical drive, no matter how you format it, is 'all eggs in one basket'.






              share|improve this answer























              • I observed tech steps followed by two tech guys. Windows 10 was installed in C: Using diskpart, extended partition was created, then a logical partition (D:) was created in extended partition. Both tech guys preferred to keep data in logical partition. I couldn’t understand why.

                – user725162
                9 hours ago






              • 1





                It's an old [& ultimately pointless] method to 'protect' your data in case you ever have to reinstall the OS. I honestly wouldn't bother with it, it offers no real protection from anything.

                – Tetsujin
                9 hours ago






              • 1





                @user725162, the reason may have nothing to do with security. As K7AAY describes, extended and logical partitions are used with MBR. MBR supports a maximum of 4 primary partitions. Using one of those for an extended partition allows you to exceed the limit by using logical partitions. When you start using recovery and other dedicated partitions, it's easy to use up the allowance of 4.

                – fixer1234
                6 hours ago















              4














              No difference whatsoever.



              For data loss-prevention, your only security is to never keep only one copy of anything.

              There's an adage...




              "Any data not stored in at lest three distinct locations ought to be considered temporary."




              In short, that means one on-site backup & one off-site backup [in case the house burns down.]



              Having all your eggs in one basket... it doesn't matter if you have two baskets, if you're carrying them both in the same hand.

              Assuming data is 'safe' because it's on a different partition on the same physical drive, no matter how you format it, is 'all eggs in one basket'.






              share|improve this answer























              • I observed tech steps followed by two tech guys. Windows 10 was installed in C: Using diskpart, extended partition was created, then a logical partition (D:) was created in extended partition. Both tech guys preferred to keep data in logical partition. I couldn’t understand why.

                – user725162
                9 hours ago






              • 1





                It's an old [& ultimately pointless] method to 'protect' your data in case you ever have to reinstall the OS. I honestly wouldn't bother with it, it offers no real protection from anything.

                – Tetsujin
                9 hours ago






              • 1





                @user725162, the reason may have nothing to do with security. As K7AAY describes, extended and logical partitions are used with MBR. MBR supports a maximum of 4 primary partitions. Using one of those for an extended partition allows you to exceed the limit by using logical partitions. When you start using recovery and other dedicated partitions, it's easy to use up the allowance of 4.

                – fixer1234
                6 hours ago













              4












              4








              4







              No difference whatsoever.



              For data loss-prevention, your only security is to never keep only one copy of anything.

              There's an adage...




              "Any data not stored in at lest three distinct locations ought to be considered temporary."




              In short, that means one on-site backup & one off-site backup [in case the house burns down.]



              Having all your eggs in one basket... it doesn't matter if you have two baskets, if you're carrying them both in the same hand.

              Assuming data is 'safe' because it's on a different partition on the same physical drive, no matter how you format it, is 'all eggs in one basket'.






              share|improve this answer













              No difference whatsoever.



              For data loss-prevention, your only security is to never keep only one copy of anything.

              There's an adage...




              "Any data not stored in at lest three distinct locations ought to be considered temporary."




              In short, that means one on-site backup & one off-site backup [in case the house burns down.]



              Having all your eggs in one basket... it doesn't matter if you have two baskets, if you're carrying them both in the same hand.

              Assuming data is 'safe' because it's on a different partition on the same physical drive, no matter how you format it, is 'all eggs in one basket'.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 10 hours ago









              TetsujinTetsujin

              17.4k5 gold badges39 silver badges65 bronze badges




              17.4k5 gold badges39 silver badges65 bronze badges












              • I observed tech steps followed by two tech guys. Windows 10 was installed in C: Using diskpart, extended partition was created, then a logical partition (D:) was created in extended partition. Both tech guys preferred to keep data in logical partition. I couldn’t understand why.

                – user725162
                9 hours ago






              • 1





                It's an old [& ultimately pointless] method to 'protect' your data in case you ever have to reinstall the OS. I honestly wouldn't bother with it, it offers no real protection from anything.

                – Tetsujin
                9 hours ago






              • 1





                @user725162, the reason may have nothing to do with security. As K7AAY describes, extended and logical partitions are used with MBR. MBR supports a maximum of 4 primary partitions. Using one of those for an extended partition allows you to exceed the limit by using logical partitions. When you start using recovery and other dedicated partitions, it's easy to use up the allowance of 4.

                – fixer1234
                6 hours ago

















              • I observed tech steps followed by two tech guys. Windows 10 was installed in C: Using diskpart, extended partition was created, then a logical partition (D:) was created in extended partition. Both tech guys preferred to keep data in logical partition. I couldn’t understand why.

                – user725162
                9 hours ago






              • 1





                It's an old [& ultimately pointless] method to 'protect' your data in case you ever have to reinstall the OS. I honestly wouldn't bother with it, it offers no real protection from anything.

                – Tetsujin
                9 hours ago






              • 1





                @user725162, the reason may have nothing to do with security. As K7AAY describes, extended and logical partitions are used with MBR. MBR supports a maximum of 4 primary partitions. Using one of those for an extended partition allows you to exceed the limit by using logical partitions. When you start using recovery and other dedicated partitions, it's easy to use up the allowance of 4.

                – fixer1234
                6 hours ago
















              I observed tech steps followed by two tech guys. Windows 10 was installed in C: Using diskpart, extended partition was created, then a logical partition (D:) was created in extended partition. Both tech guys preferred to keep data in logical partition. I couldn’t understand why.

              – user725162
              9 hours ago





              I observed tech steps followed by two tech guys. Windows 10 was installed in C: Using diskpart, extended partition was created, then a logical partition (D:) was created in extended partition. Both tech guys preferred to keep data in logical partition. I couldn’t understand why.

              – user725162
              9 hours ago




              1




              1





              It's an old [& ultimately pointless] method to 'protect' your data in case you ever have to reinstall the OS. I honestly wouldn't bother with it, it offers no real protection from anything.

              – Tetsujin
              9 hours ago





              It's an old [& ultimately pointless] method to 'protect' your data in case you ever have to reinstall the OS. I honestly wouldn't bother with it, it offers no real protection from anything.

              – Tetsujin
              9 hours ago




              1




              1





              @user725162, the reason may have nothing to do with security. As K7AAY describes, extended and logical partitions are used with MBR. MBR supports a maximum of 4 primary partitions. Using one of those for an extended partition allows you to exceed the limit by using logical partitions. When you start using recovery and other dedicated partitions, it's easy to use up the allowance of 4.

              – fixer1234
              6 hours ago





              @user725162, the reason may have nothing to do with security. As K7AAY describes, extended and logical partitions are used with MBR. MBR supports a maximum of 4 primary partitions. Using one of those for an extended partition allows you to exceed the limit by using logical partitions. When you start using recovery and other dedicated partitions, it's easy to use up the allowance of 4.

              – fixer1234
              6 hours ago











              0














              When creating a second partition for data storage (i.e., not the boot partition) for an OS, the primary difference here is that it may affect your ability to create more partitions later.



              There are four primary partition slots on an MBR-formatted drive. One of these may be used to create/hold an extended partition, which in turn allows additional partitions on the drive that do not use any of the remaining three primary partition slots in the MBR.



              If all four primary partition slots are allocated to primary partitions, it's no longer possible to add an extended partition and thus you can add no more partitions to that drive, even if you have free space. Therefore it's standard practice, when creating the first partition for which an extended partition slot can be used, to create it as an extended partition. This ensures that further additions can never run out of partition slots.



              Some older or less sophisticated boot programs may not be able to boot from an extended partition but only from a primary one, so it's also good practice not to use a primary slot for a partition you know you will never want to boot, leaving it free in case you later need another bootable partition.






              share|improve this answer



























                0














                When creating a second partition for data storage (i.e., not the boot partition) for an OS, the primary difference here is that it may affect your ability to create more partitions later.



                There are four primary partition slots on an MBR-formatted drive. One of these may be used to create/hold an extended partition, which in turn allows additional partitions on the drive that do not use any of the remaining three primary partition slots in the MBR.



                If all four primary partition slots are allocated to primary partitions, it's no longer possible to add an extended partition and thus you can add no more partitions to that drive, even if you have free space. Therefore it's standard practice, when creating the first partition for which an extended partition slot can be used, to create it as an extended partition. This ensures that further additions can never run out of partition slots.



                Some older or less sophisticated boot programs may not be able to boot from an extended partition but only from a primary one, so it's also good practice not to use a primary slot for a partition you know you will never want to boot, leaving it free in case you later need another bootable partition.






                share|improve this answer

























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  When creating a second partition for data storage (i.e., not the boot partition) for an OS, the primary difference here is that it may affect your ability to create more partitions later.



                  There are four primary partition slots on an MBR-formatted drive. One of these may be used to create/hold an extended partition, which in turn allows additional partitions on the drive that do not use any of the remaining three primary partition slots in the MBR.



                  If all four primary partition slots are allocated to primary partitions, it's no longer possible to add an extended partition and thus you can add no more partitions to that drive, even if you have free space. Therefore it's standard practice, when creating the first partition for which an extended partition slot can be used, to create it as an extended partition. This ensures that further additions can never run out of partition slots.



                  Some older or less sophisticated boot programs may not be able to boot from an extended partition but only from a primary one, so it's also good practice not to use a primary slot for a partition you know you will never want to boot, leaving it free in case you later need another bootable partition.






                  share|improve this answer













                  When creating a second partition for data storage (i.e., not the boot partition) for an OS, the primary difference here is that it may affect your ability to create more partitions later.



                  There are four primary partition slots on an MBR-formatted drive. One of these may be used to create/hold an extended partition, which in turn allows additional partitions on the drive that do not use any of the remaining three primary partition slots in the MBR.



                  If all four primary partition slots are allocated to primary partitions, it's no longer possible to add an extended partition and thus you can add no more partitions to that drive, even if you have free space. Therefore it's standard practice, when creating the first partition for which an extended partition slot can be used, to create it as an extended partition. This ensures that further additions can never run out of partition slots.



                  Some older or less sophisticated boot programs may not be able to boot from an extended partition but only from a primary one, so it's also good practice not to use a primary slot for a partition you know you will never want to boot, leaving it free in case you later need another bootable partition.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 30 mins ago









                  Curt J. SampsonCurt J. Sampson

                  2481 silver badge9 bronze badges




                  2481 silver badge9 bronze badges



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1452819%2fwhich-is-better-for-keeping-data-primary-partition-or-logical-partition%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                      Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                      Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її