Mfcttrf

How to pass hash as password to ssh server

Meaning of the (idiomatic?) expression "seghe mentali"

What is a common way to tell if an academic is "above average," or outstanding in their field? Is their h-index (Hirsh index) one of them?

Is there an age requirement to play in Adventurers League?

The origin of list data structure

Motion-trail-like lines

Disabling quote conversion in docstrings

All superlinear runtime algorithms are asymptotically equivalent to convex function?

How to calculate rate of axial precession?

Is there precedent or are there procedures for a US president refusing to concede to an electoral defeat?

Where are the "shires" in the UK?

Execute command on shell command output

Krull dimension of the ring of global sections

Sheared off exhasut pipe: How to fix without a welder?

What is the closest airport to the center of the city it serves?

Some Russian letters overlap the next line of text when used in drop caps

Dangerous workplace travelling

How to deal with employer who keeps me at work after working hours

Simple Derivative Proof?

Gerrymandering Puzzle - Rig the Election

Is 'contemporary' ambiguous and if so is there a better word?

Game artist computer workstation set-up – is this overkill?

Is disk brake effectiveness mitigated by tyres losing traction under strong braking?

Why does blending blueberries, milk, banana and vanilla extract cause the mixture to have a yogurty consistency?

Is space itself expanding or is it just momentum from the big bang carrying things apart?

Did the Big Bang happen at a point?How is it possible for astronomers to see something 13B light years away?How to test whether galaxies are moving away from each other in a static background or whether space is being created beween them?Is it possible that universe might not be speeding up expansion?Evidence for expansion of spaceWhy do galaxies “disappear?”Expanding universe and speed of lightCan redshift occur from relative velocity or just from expanding spaceThe speed of the outer stars of galaxiesGalaxies moving in fixed background or fixed in expanding backgroundWhat does general relativity say about the relative velocities of objects that are far away from one another?

4

$begingroup$

So, we observe that galaxies are moving apart (on average) and the further away from us they are the faster they are moving away from us. If space was expanding that would explain this.

However, I imagine that if a primordial explosion happened then at some point close to where the explosion happened things would not move much, and they would be moving faster the further away you were from "ground zero".

But if we were not near ground zero there should be some anisotropy in the speeds we observe, is that correct? There should be a "ground zero" in the "explosion model", right??

However, regardless of the "ground zero" issue, do we (or could we) distinguish between a uniform "explosion" model and the idea that space is expanding?

general-relativity astronomy

share|cite|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

Paul Young

asked 4 hours ago

Paul YoungPaul Young

1,623319

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Possible duplicate of Did the Big Bang happen at a point?
  $endgroup$
  – pela
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

4

$begingroup$

So, we observe that galaxies are moving apart (on average) and the further away from us they are the faster they are moving away from us. If space was expanding that would explain this.

However, I imagine that if a primordial explosion happened then at some point close to where the explosion happened things would not move much, and they would be moving faster the further away you were from "ground zero".

But if we were not near ground zero there should be some anisotropy in the speeds we observe, is that correct? There should be a "ground zero" in the "explosion model", right??

However, regardless of the "ground zero" issue, do we (or could we) distinguish between a uniform "explosion" model and the idea that space is expanding?

general-relativity astronomy

share|cite|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

Paul Young

asked 4 hours ago

Paul YoungPaul Young

1,623319

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Possible duplicate of Did the Big Bang happen at a point?
  $endgroup$
  – pela
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

So, we observe that galaxies are moving apart (on average) and the further away from us they are the faster they are moving away from us. If space was expanding that would explain this.

However, I imagine that if a primordial explosion happened then at some point close to where the explosion happened things would not move much, and they would be moving faster the further away you were from "ground zero".

But if we were not near ground zero there should be some anisotropy in the speeds we observe, is that correct? There should be a "ground zero" in the "explosion model", right??

However, regardless of the "ground zero" issue, do we (or could we) distinguish between a uniform "explosion" model and the idea that space is expanding?

general-relativity astronomy

share|cite|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

Paul Young

asked 4 hours ago

Paul YoungPaul Young

1,623319

$endgroup$

share|cite|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

Paul Young

asked 4 hours ago

Paul YoungPaul Young

1,623319

share|cite|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

Paul Young

asked 4 hours ago

Paul YoungPaul Young

1,623319

asked 4 hours ago

Paul YoungPaul Young

1,623319

asked 4 hours ago

Paul YoungPaul Young

1,623319

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

3

$begingroup$

It is a misconception that the big bang happened at a point. It did not. There is no ground zero point (in space) where you could point and say, this is where the explosion happened. Space is expanding everywhere at the same rate, and everything is getting farther away from everything.

Now this is not completely true, because galaxies are getting usually farther away from each other, because in the intergalactic space, expansion is dominant.

But inside galaxies, gravity dominates, so space does not expand inside galaxies.

So on the bigger scale, between the intergalactic voids of space, where expansion dominates space itself is expanding, and this expansion seems to be accelerating. Now an explosion as you say could not do this, because to have an ever accelerating expansion you need more and more energy (whatever is causing expansion, like dark energy or negative density). An explosion cannot do that.

So the big bang did not happen at a point in space, but it happened everywhere at the same time.

There is no center of the universe or as you say a ground zero point.

The universe is not like a ball expanding, there is nothing outside the universe that it is expanding into.

Please see here:

Did the Big Bang happen at a point?

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

Árpád SzendreiÁrpád Szendrei

4,5371625

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Got it - that the expansion seems to be accelerating seems very key to me
  $endgroup$
  – Paul Young
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f477947%2fis-space-itself-expanding-or-is-it-just-momentum-from-the-big-bang-carrying-thin%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

3

$begingroup$

It is a misconception that the big bang happened at a point. It did not. There is no ground zero point (in space) where you could point and say, this is where the explosion happened. Space is expanding everywhere at the same rate, and everything is getting farther away from everything.

Now this is not completely true, because galaxies are getting usually farther away from each other, because in the intergalactic space, expansion is dominant.

But inside galaxies, gravity dominates, so space does not expand inside galaxies.

So on the bigger scale, between the intergalactic voids of space, where expansion dominates space itself is expanding, and this expansion seems to be accelerating. Now an explosion as you say could not do this, because to have an ever accelerating expansion you need more and more energy (whatever is causing expansion, like dark energy or negative density). An explosion cannot do that.

So the big bang did not happen at a point in space, but it happened everywhere at the same time.

There is no center of the universe or as you say a ground zero point.

The universe is not like a ball expanding, there is nothing outside the universe that it is expanding into.

Please see here:

Did the Big Bang happen at a point?

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

Árpád SzendreiÁrpád Szendrei

4,5371625

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Got it - that the expansion seems to be accelerating seems very key to me
  $endgroup$
  – Paul Young
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

3

$begingroup$

It is a misconception that the big bang happened at a point. It did not. There is no ground zero point (in space) where you could point and say, this is where the explosion happened. Space is expanding everywhere at the same rate, and everything is getting farther away from everything.

Now this is not completely true, because galaxies are getting usually farther away from each other, because in the intergalactic space, expansion is dominant.

But inside galaxies, gravity dominates, so space does not expand inside galaxies.

So on the bigger scale, between the intergalactic voids of space, where expansion dominates space itself is expanding, and this expansion seems to be accelerating. Now an explosion as you say could not do this, because to have an ever accelerating expansion you need more and more energy (whatever is causing expansion, like dark energy or negative density). An explosion cannot do that.

So the big bang did not happen at a point in space, but it happened everywhere at the same time.

There is no center of the universe or as you say a ground zero point.

The universe is not like a ball expanding, there is nothing outside the universe that it is expanding into.

Please see here:

Did the Big Bang happen at a point?

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

Árpád SzendreiÁrpád Szendrei

4,5371625

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Got it - that the expansion seems to be accelerating seems very key to me
  $endgroup$
  – Paul Young
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

It is a misconception that the big bang happened at a point. It did not. There is no ground zero point (in space) where you could point and say, this is where the explosion happened. Space is expanding everywhere at the same rate, and everything is getting farther away from everything.

Now this is not completely true, because galaxies are getting usually farther away from each other, because in the intergalactic space, expansion is dominant.

But inside galaxies, gravity dominates, so space does not expand inside galaxies.

So on the bigger scale, between the intergalactic voids of space, where expansion dominates space itself is expanding, and this expansion seems to be accelerating. Now an explosion as you say could not do this, because to have an ever accelerating expansion you need more and more energy (whatever is causing expansion, like dark energy or negative density). An explosion cannot do that.

So the big bang did not happen at a point in space, but it happened everywhere at the same time.

There is no center of the universe or as you say a ground zero point.

The universe is not like a ball expanding, there is nothing outside the universe that it is expanding into.

Please see here:

Did the Big Bang happen at a point?

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

Árpád SzendreiÁrpád Szendrei

4,5371625

$endgroup$

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

Árpád SzendreiÁrpád Szendrei

4,5371625

answered 3 hours ago

Árpád SzendreiÁrpád Szendrei

4,5371625

answered 3 hours ago

Árpád SzendreiÁrpád Szendrei

4,5371625