If I set assumevalid=0 after syncing the blockchain will Bitcoin Core go back and validate historical blocks?bitcoind synced more blocks than in the blockchain?Do I need 145GB disk space to validate and relay transactions with Bitcoin Core?What are the trust assumptions in --assumed-valid in bitcoin core 0.14?How do I delete the blockchain after uninstalling Bitcion Core?How to delete last n blocks / roll back to specific block number in Bitcoin Core? (Like `monero-blockchain-import --pop-blocks n`)How can i set fee permanently via paytxfee commandBitcoin-cli using getblock to retrieve historical dataAfter a long connection to the wallet, it offers to reinstall blocks and synchronize all Bitcoin core blocksBitcoin core node is not starting after -prune is applied in bitcoin.config fileHow to revert back several blocks in Bitcoin Core without re-syncing from scratch
3D Volume in TIKZ
Proving n+1 th differential as zero given lower differentials are 0
Why are UK Bank Holidays on Mondays?
Copy previous line to current line from text file
If I set assumevalid=0 after syncing the blockchain will Bitcoin Core go back and validate historical blocks?
Causes of bimodal distributions when bootstrapping a meta-analysis model
Wrong answer from DSolve when solving a differential equation
Point of the Dothraki's attack in GoT S8E3?
How did the Venus Express detect lightning?
Are the Night's Watch still required?
Adding command shortcuts to bin
Nominativ or Akkusativ
Shutter speed -vs- effective image stabilisation
Where can I go to avoid planes overhead?
US born but as a child of foreign diplomat
What was Bran's plan to kill the Night King?
Should homeowners insurance cover the cost of the home?
Why did the Apollo 13 crew extend the LM landing gear?
Why does this derived table improve performance?
What does this wavy downward arrow preceding a piano chord mean?
Why do people keep telling me that I am a bad photographer?
Would you use llamarse for an animal's name?
What is the solution to this metapuzzle from a university puzzling column?
Where in Bitcoin Core does it do X?
If I set assumevalid=0 after syncing the blockchain will Bitcoin Core go back and validate historical blocks?
bitcoind synced more blocks than in the blockchain?Do I need 145GB disk space to validate and relay transactions with Bitcoin Core?What are the trust assumptions in --assumed-valid in bitcoin core 0.14?How do I delete the blockchain after uninstalling Bitcion Core?How to delete last n blocks / roll back to specific block number in Bitcoin Core? (Like `monero-blockchain-import --pop-blocks n`)How can i set fee permanently via paytxfee commandBitcoin-cli using getblock to retrieve historical dataAfter a long connection to the wallet, it offers to reinstall blocks and synchronize all Bitcoin core blocksBitcoin core node is not starting after -prune is applied in bitcoin.config fileHow to revert back several blocks in Bitcoin Core without re-syncing from scratch
I originally synced my node using the Bitcoin Core default assumevalid value. If I set assumevalid=0 in bitcoin.conf and restart my node, will my node go back and validate historical blocks?
bitcoin-core bitcoind signature transaction-verification assume-valid
asked 2 hours ago
paddypaddy
233
add a comment |
I originally synced my node using the Bitcoin Core default assumevalid value. If I set assumevalid=0 in bitcoin.conf and restart my node, will my node go back and validate historical blocks?
bitcoin-core bitcoind signature transaction-verification assume-valid
asked 2 hours ago
paddypaddy
233
add a comment |
I originally synced my node using the Bitcoin Core default assumevalid value. If I set assumevalid=0 in bitcoin.conf and restart my node, will my node go back and validate historical blocks?
bitcoin-core bitcoind signature transaction-verification assume-valid
asked 2 hours ago
paddypaddy
233
I originally synced my node using the Bitcoin Core default assumevalid value. If I set assumevalid=0 in bitcoin.conf and restart my node, will my node go back and validate historical blocks?
bitcoin-core bitcoind signature transaction-verification assume-valid
bitcoin-core bitcoind signature transaction-verification assume-valid
asked 2 hours ago
paddypaddy
233
asked 2 hours ago
paddypaddy
233
asked 2 hours ago
paddypaddy
233
asked 2 hours ago
paddypaddy
233
asked 2 hours ago
paddypaddy
233
233
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
No, it won't.
That's also not possible without rebuilding the UTXO set from scratch, as the unspent outputs being spent need to be known to validate spends against.
If you want to force a revalidation from scratch, start with -reindex-chainstate. This will blow away the UTXO set, and recreate it from the blocks on disk, and revalidate everything in the process (including all signatures, if -assumevalid=0 is set).
answered 1 hour ago
Pieter WuillePieter Wuille
49.1k4101164
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "308"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbitcoin.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f87453%2fif-i-set-assumevalid-0-after-syncing-the-blockchain-will-bitcoin-core-go-back-an%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
No, it won't.
That's also not possible without rebuilding the UTXO set from scratch, as the unspent outputs being spent need to be known to validate spends against.
If you want to force a revalidation from scratch, start with -reindex-chainstate. This will blow away the UTXO set, and recreate it from the blocks on disk, and revalidate everything in the process (including all signatures, if -assumevalid=0 is set).
answered 1 hour ago
Pieter WuillePieter Wuille
49.1k4101164
add a comment |
No, it won't.
That's also not possible without rebuilding the UTXO set from scratch, as the unspent outputs being spent need to be known to validate spends against.
If you want to force a revalidation from scratch, start with -reindex-chainstate. This will blow away the UTXO set, and recreate it from the blocks on disk, and revalidate everything in the process (including all signatures, if -assumevalid=0 is set).
answered 1 hour ago
Pieter WuillePieter Wuille
49.1k4101164
add a comment |
No, it won't.
That's also not possible without rebuilding the UTXO set from scratch, as the unspent outputs being spent need to be known to validate spends against.
If you want to force a revalidation from scratch, start with -reindex-chainstate. This will blow away the UTXO set, and recreate it from the blocks on disk, and revalidate everything in the process (including all signatures, if -assumevalid=0 is set).
answered 1 hour ago
Pieter WuillePieter Wuille
49.1k4101164
No, it won't.
That's also not possible without rebuilding the UTXO set from scratch, as the unspent outputs being spent need to be known to validate spends against.
If you want to force a revalidation from scratch, start with -reindex-chainstate. This will blow away the UTXO set, and recreate it from the blocks on disk, and revalidate everything in the process (including all signatures, if -assumevalid=0 is set).
answered 1 hour ago
Pieter WuillePieter Wuille
49.1k4101164
answered 1 hour ago
Pieter WuillePieter Wuille
49.1k4101164
answered 1 hour ago
Pieter WuillePieter Wuille
49.1k4101164
answered 1 hour ago
Pieter WuillePieter Wuille
49.1k4101164
49.1k4101164
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Bitcoin Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbitcoin.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f87453%2fif-i-set-assumevalid-0-after-syncing-the-blockchain-will-bitcoin-core-go-back-an%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
