Understanding this description of teleportation Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Quantum algorithm for linear systems of equations (HHL09): Step 1 - Confusion regarding the usage of phase estimation algorithmQuantum algorithm for linear systems of equations (HHL09): Step 2 - What is $|Psi_0rangle$?HHL algorithm — problem with the outcome of postselectionQutrit TeleportationGeneral construction of $W_n$-stateCalculating measurement result of quantum swap circuitQuantum teleportation: second classical bit for removing entanglement?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Quantum teleportation with moving Alice and BobHow to complete this teleportation circuit? How to create a copy of $|psi〉$?

Stop battery usage [Ubuntu 18]

I'm having difficulty getting my players to do stuff in a sandbox campaign

What do you call a plan that's an alternative plan in case your initial plan fails?

If the nonce is 32 bits why the proof of it is difficult?

How should I respond to a player wanting to catch a sword between their hands?

Stars Make Stars

Unexpected result with right shift after bitwise negation

Can I throw a longsword at someone?

Why does this iterative way of solving of equation work?

Can a non-EU citizen traveling with me come with me through the EU passport line?

What would be Julian Assange's expected punishment, on the current English criminal law?

Estimate capacitor parameters

Is there a documented rationale why the House Ways and Means chairman can demand tax info?

What did Darwin mean by 'squib' here?

How can players take actions together that are impossible otherwise?

Can I add database to AWS RDS MySQL without creating new instance?

Autumning in love

Was credit for the black hole image misattributed?

Single author papers against my advisor's will?

Active filter with series inductor and resistor - do these exist?

If A makes B more likely then B makes A more likely"

Fishing simulator

Strange behaviour of Check

Two different pronunciation of "понял"



Understanding this description of teleportation



Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Quantum algorithm for linear systems of equations (HHL09): Step 1 - Confusion regarding the usage of phase estimation algorithmQuantum algorithm for linear systems of equations (HHL09): Step 2 - What is $|Psi_0rangle$?HHL algorithm — problem with the outcome of postselectionQutrit TeleportationGeneral construction of $W_n$-stateCalculating measurement result of quantum swap circuitQuantum teleportation: second classical bit for removing entanglement?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Quantum teleportation with moving Alice and BobHow to complete this teleportation circuit? How to create a copy of $|psi〉$?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3












$begingroup$


In the context of quantum teleportation, my lecturer writes the following (note that I assume the reader is familiar with the circuit):



If the measurement of the first qubit is 0 and the measurement of the second qubit is 0 , then we have the state $left|phi_4right>=c_0left|000right>+c_1left|001right>=left|00right>otimes left(c_0left|0right>+c_1left|1right>right)=left|00right> otimes left|psi 'right>$.



Now to get the final teleported state we have to go through the final two gates $Z, X$.



My lecturer writes this as;



$left|gammaright>=Z^0X^0left|psi 'right>= left|psi'right>= c_0left|0right>+c_1left|1right>$



Here are my questions:



  1. Why is it that the we do not have $left|gammaright>=Z^0X^0left(left|00right>otimes left|psi 'right>right)$? I don't understand why we cut the state $left|phi_4right>$ "in half ", to use bad terminology, at this step.


  2. What does the superscript 0 on the operators refer to?


  3. In the final state again to use bad terminology we only use half of the state $left|phi_4right>$ can we always assume that the final state will be the $left|psi'right>$ part of $left|phi_4right>=left|xyright>otimesleft|psi'right>$ state, and if so what is the significance of the final step.


If my question is unanswerable due to a deep misunderstanding of the math processes here, I'd still really appreciate some clarification on whatever points can be answered and I can edit it to make more sense as I learn.










share|improve this question









New contributor




can'tcauchy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$


















    3












    $begingroup$


    In the context of quantum teleportation, my lecturer writes the following (note that I assume the reader is familiar with the circuit):



    If the measurement of the first qubit is 0 and the measurement of the second qubit is 0 , then we have the state $left|phi_4right>=c_0left|000right>+c_1left|001right>=left|00right>otimes left(c_0left|0right>+c_1left|1right>right)=left|00right> otimes left|psi 'right>$.



    Now to get the final teleported state we have to go through the final two gates $Z, X$.



    My lecturer writes this as;



    $left|gammaright>=Z^0X^0left|psi 'right>= left|psi'right>= c_0left|0right>+c_1left|1right>$



    Here are my questions:



    1. Why is it that the we do not have $left|gammaright>=Z^0X^0left(left|00right>otimes left|psi 'right>right)$? I don't understand why we cut the state $left|phi_4right>$ "in half ", to use bad terminology, at this step.


    2. What does the superscript 0 on the operators refer to?


    3. In the final state again to use bad terminology we only use half of the state $left|phi_4right>$ can we always assume that the final state will be the $left|psi'right>$ part of $left|phi_4right>=left|xyright>otimesleft|psi'right>$ state, and if so what is the significance of the final step.


    If my question is unanswerable due to a deep misunderstanding of the math processes here, I'd still really appreciate some clarification on whatever points can be answered and I can edit it to make more sense as I learn.










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    can'tcauchy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$














      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      In the context of quantum teleportation, my lecturer writes the following (note that I assume the reader is familiar with the circuit):



      If the measurement of the first qubit is 0 and the measurement of the second qubit is 0 , then we have the state $left|phi_4right>=c_0left|000right>+c_1left|001right>=left|00right>otimes left(c_0left|0right>+c_1left|1right>right)=left|00right> otimes left|psi 'right>$.



      Now to get the final teleported state we have to go through the final two gates $Z, X$.



      My lecturer writes this as;



      $left|gammaright>=Z^0X^0left|psi 'right>= left|psi'right>= c_0left|0right>+c_1left|1right>$



      Here are my questions:



      1. Why is it that the we do not have $left|gammaright>=Z^0X^0left(left|00right>otimes left|psi 'right>right)$? I don't understand why we cut the state $left|phi_4right>$ "in half ", to use bad terminology, at this step.


      2. What does the superscript 0 on the operators refer to?


      3. In the final state again to use bad terminology we only use half of the state $left|phi_4right>$ can we always assume that the final state will be the $left|psi'right>$ part of $left|phi_4right>=left|xyright>otimesleft|psi'right>$ state, and if so what is the significance of the final step.


      If my question is unanswerable due to a deep misunderstanding of the math processes here, I'd still really appreciate some clarification on whatever points can be answered and I can edit it to make more sense as I learn.










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      can'tcauchy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      In the context of quantum teleportation, my lecturer writes the following (note that I assume the reader is familiar with the circuit):



      If the measurement of the first qubit is 0 and the measurement of the second qubit is 0 , then we have the state $left|phi_4right>=c_0left|000right>+c_1left|001right>=left|00right>otimes left(c_0left|0right>+c_1left|1right>right)=left|00right> otimes left|psi 'right>$.



      Now to get the final teleported state we have to go through the final two gates $Z, X$.



      My lecturer writes this as;



      $left|gammaright>=Z^0X^0left|psi 'right>= left|psi'right>= c_0left|0right>+c_1left|1right>$



      Here are my questions:



      1. Why is it that the we do not have $left|gammaright>=Z^0X^0left(left|00right>otimes left|psi 'right>right)$? I don't understand why we cut the state $left|phi_4right>$ "in half ", to use bad terminology, at this step.


      2. What does the superscript 0 on the operators refer to?


      3. In the final state again to use bad terminology we only use half of the state $left|phi_4right>$ can we always assume that the final state will be the $left|psi'right>$ part of $left|phi_4right>=left|xyright>otimesleft|psi'right>$ state, and if so what is the significance of the final step.


      If my question is unanswerable due to a deep misunderstanding of the math processes here, I'd still really appreciate some clarification on whatever points can be answered and I can edit it to make more sense as I learn.







      algorithm quantum-state quantum-information teleportation






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      can'tcauchy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      can'tcauchy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 1 hour ago









      Sanchayan Dutta

      6,67641556




      6,67641556






      New contributor




      can'tcauchy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 7 hours ago









      can'tcauchycan'tcauchy

      1285




      1285




      New contributor




      can'tcauchy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      can'tcauchy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      can'tcauchy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          1. The first two qubits stay on the sender's side, and since they are not entangled with the receiver's qubit, it's not necessary to mention them any further — we switched to discussing the receiver's side of the protocol, and all information from the first two qubits is now in measurement results.


          2. The superscripts denote the power of the operator applied: if both measurement results are 0, you don't need to apply X or Z corrections, which is the same as applying these operators raised to power 0 ($X^0 = Z^0 = I$).


          3. After measuring the first two qubits, the state will always be represented as $|xyrangle otimes |textsome staterangle$, but to convert the receiver's qubit from $|textsome staterangle$ to the state that needed to be teleported $|psi'rangle$ you'll need to apply corrections which depend on the measurement results $x$ and $y$. I believe this is what you refer to as the final step, and its goal is fixing the amplitudes of the state for it to match the state that was teleported.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Minor nitpicks. If you write text within a mathematical expression it's best to use the text formatting; otherwise, the $spacing space between space letters space is space somewhat space uneven$. Moreover, 1., 2. and 3. is the only format that works for numbered lists (on SE). 1), 2) and 3) does not work. Cf. help/formatting. I've edited these things; hope you don't mind. Also, it might be useful to clarify the Alice-Bob terminology in the answer itself as the OP doesn't seem to be using it.
            $endgroup$
            – Sanchayan Dutta
            1 hour ago












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "694"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );






          can'tcauchy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f5913%2funderstanding-this-description-of-teleportation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2












          $begingroup$

          1. The first two qubits stay on the sender's side, and since they are not entangled with the receiver's qubit, it's not necessary to mention them any further — we switched to discussing the receiver's side of the protocol, and all information from the first two qubits is now in measurement results.


          2. The superscripts denote the power of the operator applied: if both measurement results are 0, you don't need to apply X or Z corrections, which is the same as applying these operators raised to power 0 ($X^0 = Z^0 = I$).


          3. After measuring the first two qubits, the state will always be represented as $|xyrangle otimes |textsome staterangle$, but to convert the receiver's qubit from $|textsome staterangle$ to the state that needed to be teleported $|psi'rangle$ you'll need to apply corrections which depend on the measurement results $x$ and $y$. I believe this is what you refer to as the final step, and its goal is fixing the amplitudes of the state for it to match the state that was teleported.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Minor nitpicks. If you write text within a mathematical expression it's best to use the text formatting; otherwise, the $spacing space between space letters space is space somewhat space uneven$. Moreover, 1., 2. and 3. is the only format that works for numbered lists (on SE). 1), 2) and 3) does not work. Cf. help/formatting. I've edited these things; hope you don't mind. Also, it might be useful to clarify the Alice-Bob terminology in the answer itself as the OP doesn't seem to be using it.
            $endgroup$
            – Sanchayan Dutta
            1 hour ago
















          2












          $begingroup$

          1. The first two qubits stay on the sender's side, and since they are not entangled with the receiver's qubit, it's not necessary to mention them any further — we switched to discussing the receiver's side of the protocol, and all information from the first two qubits is now in measurement results.


          2. The superscripts denote the power of the operator applied: if both measurement results are 0, you don't need to apply X or Z corrections, which is the same as applying these operators raised to power 0 ($X^0 = Z^0 = I$).


          3. After measuring the first two qubits, the state will always be represented as $|xyrangle otimes |textsome staterangle$, but to convert the receiver's qubit from $|textsome staterangle$ to the state that needed to be teleported $|psi'rangle$ you'll need to apply corrections which depend on the measurement results $x$ and $y$. I believe this is what you refer to as the final step, and its goal is fixing the amplitudes of the state for it to match the state that was teleported.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Minor nitpicks. If you write text within a mathematical expression it's best to use the text formatting; otherwise, the $spacing space between space letters space is space somewhat space uneven$. Moreover, 1., 2. and 3. is the only format that works for numbered lists (on SE). 1), 2) and 3) does not work. Cf. help/formatting. I've edited these things; hope you don't mind. Also, it might be useful to clarify the Alice-Bob terminology in the answer itself as the OP doesn't seem to be using it.
            $endgroup$
            – Sanchayan Dutta
            1 hour ago














          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          1. The first two qubits stay on the sender's side, and since they are not entangled with the receiver's qubit, it's not necessary to mention them any further — we switched to discussing the receiver's side of the protocol, and all information from the first two qubits is now in measurement results.


          2. The superscripts denote the power of the operator applied: if both measurement results are 0, you don't need to apply X or Z corrections, which is the same as applying these operators raised to power 0 ($X^0 = Z^0 = I$).


          3. After measuring the first two qubits, the state will always be represented as $|xyrangle otimes |textsome staterangle$, but to convert the receiver's qubit from $|textsome staterangle$ to the state that needed to be teleported $|psi'rangle$ you'll need to apply corrections which depend on the measurement results $x$ and $y$. I believe this is what you refer to as the final step, and its goal is fixing the amplitudes of the state for it to match the state that was teleported.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          1. The first two qubits stay on the sender's side, and since they are not entangled with the receiver's qubit, it's not necessary to mention them any further — we switched to discussing the receiver's side of the protocol, and all information from the first two qubits is now in measurement results.


          2. The superscripts denote the power of the operator applied: if both measurement results are 0, you don't need to apply X or Z corrections, which is the same as applying these operators raised to power 0 ($X^0 = Z^0 = I$).


          3. After measuring the first two qubits, the state will always be represented as $|xyrangle otimes |textsome staterangle$, but to convert the receiver's qubit from $|textsome staterangle$ to the state that needed to be teleported $|psi'rangle$ you'll need to apply corrections which depend on the measurement results $x$ and $y$. I believe this is what you refer to as the final step, and its goal is fixing the amplitudes of the state for it to match the state that was teleported.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 52 mins ago

























          answered 1 hour ago









          Mariia MykhailovaMariia Mykhailova

          1,8651212




          1,8651212







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Minor nitpicks. If you write text within a mathematical expression it's best to use the text formatting; otherwise, the $spacing space between space letters space is space somewhat space uneven$. Moreover, 1., 2. and 3. is the only format that works for numbered lists (on SE). 1), 2) and 3) does not work. Cf. help/formatting. I've edited these things; hope you don't mind. Also, it might be useful to clarify the Alice-Bob terminology in the answer itself as the OP doesn't seem to be using it.
            $endgroup$
            – Sanchayan Dutta
            1 hour ago













          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Minor nitpicks. If you write text within a mathematical expression it's best to use the text formatting; otherwise, the $spacing space between space letters space is space somewhat space uneven$. Moreover, 1., 2. and 3. is the only format that works for numbered lists (on SE). 1), 2) and 3) does not work. Cf. help/formatting. I've edited these things; hope you don't mind. Also, it might be useful to clarify the Alice-Bob terminology in the answer itself as the OP doesn't seem to be using it.
            $endgroup$
            – Sanchayan Dutta
            1 hour ago








          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          Minor nitpicks. If you write text within a mathematical expression it's best to use the text formatting; otherwise, the $spacing space between space letters space is space somewhat space uneven$. Moreover, 1., 2. and 3. is the only format that works for numbered lists (on SE). 1), 2) and 3) does not work. Cf. help/formatting. I've edited these things; hope you don't mind. Also, it might be useful to clarify the Alice-Bob terminology in the answer itself as the OP doesn't seem to be using it.
          $endgroup$
          – Sanchayan Dutta
          1 hour ago





          $begingroup$
          Minor nitpicks. If you write text within a mathematical expression it's best to use the text formatting; otherwise, the $spacing space between space letters space is space somewhat space uneven$. Moreover, 1., 2. and 3. is the only format that works for numbered lists (on SE). 1), 2) and 3) does not work. Cf. help/formatting. I've edited these things; hope you don't mind. Also, it might be useful to clarify the Alice-Bob terminology in the answer itself as the OP doesn't seem to be using it.
          $endgroup$
          – Sanchayan Dutta
          1 hour ago











          can'tcauchy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          can'tcauchy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          can'tcauchy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











          can'tcauchy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














          Thanks for contributing an answer to Quantum Computing Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f5913%2funderstanding-this-description-of-teleportation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

          Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

          Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її