Complexity of many constant time steps with occasional logarithmic steps Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Upper-bounding the number of comparisons for Sorting to $Theta(n)$ using a physically big number like Number of Particles in the UniverseWhy does this mergesort variant not do Θ(n) comparisons on average?Why does the total credit associated with a data structure must be nonnegative at all times for the accounting method?How does the token method of amortized analysis work in this example?In Amortized Analysis, can we chose how big $n$ is?Incremental strongly connected componentsThe validity of the potential function for splay treeClock page replacement policy vs LRU page replacement policy, is Clock more efficient?if binary heap potential function is c*size(binary heap)) then insert will not take O(logn)and extract min will not take O(1) amortized timeMergable heap with no key knowledge cannot EXTRACT-MIN in $o(log n)$ amortized time
Are my PIs rude or am I just being too sensitive?
Passing functions in C++
How to say that you spent the night with someone, you were only sleeping and nothing else?
How is simplicity better than precision and clarity in prose?
Fishing simulator
Is it possible to ask for a hotel room without minibar/extra services?
Limit for e and 1/e
What would be Julian Assange's expected punishment, on the current English criminal law?
What kind of display is this?
Replacing HDD with SSD; what about non-APFS/APFS?
Is there a documented rationale why the House Ways and Means chairman can demand tax info?
Was credit for the black hole image misattributed?
Can smartphones with the same camera sensor have different image quality?
Slither Like a Snake
Stop battery usage [Ubuntu 18]
Can a zero nonce be safely used with AES-GCM if the key is random and never used again?
Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?
How are presidential pardons supposed to be used?
Make it rain characters
Should you tell Jews they are breaking a commandment?
How do you clear the ApexPages.getMessages() collection in a test?
Statistical model of ligand substitution
Problem when applying foreach loop
How to colour the US map with Yellow, Green, Red and Blue to minimize the number of states with the colour of Green
Complexity of many constant time steps with occasional logarithmic steps
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Upper-bounding the number of comparisons for Sorting to $Theta(n)$ using a physically big number like Number of Particles in the UniverseWhy does this mergesort variant not do Θ(n) comparisons on average?Why does the total credit associated with a data structure must be nonnegative at all times for the accounting method?How does the token method of amortized analysis work in this example?In Amortized Analysis, can we chose how big $n$ is?Incremental strongly connected componentsThe validity of the potential function for splay treeClock page replacement policy vs LRU page replacement policy, is Clock more efficient?if binary heap potential function is c*size(binary heap)) then insert will not take O(logn)and extract min will not take O(1) amortized timeMergable heap with no key knowledge cannot EXTRACT-MIN in $o(log n)$ amortized time
$begingroup$
I have a data structure that can perform a task $T$ in constant time, $O(1)$. However, every $k$th invocation requires $O(logn)$, where $k$ is constant.
Is it possible for this task to ever take amortized constant time, or is it impossible because the logarithm will eventually become greater than $k$?
If an upper bound for $n$ is known as $N$, can $k$ be chosen to be less than $logN$?
algorithm-analysis runtime-analysis amortized-analysis
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a data structure that can perform a task $T$ in constant time, $O(1)$. However, every $k$th invocation requires $O(logn)$, where $k$ is constant.
Is it possible for this task to ever take amortized constant time, or is it impossible because the logarithm will eventually become greater than $k$?
If an upper bound for $n$ is known as $N$, can $k$ be chosen to be less than $logN$?
algorithm-analysis runtime-analysis amortized-analysis
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
It depends on how $k$ relates to $n$. For instance $k=2$ then this will not matter and $n$ operations will take $O(n log n)$. If $k = n$ then after $n$ operations we have time $O(n + log n)$. How does $k$ relate to $n$?
$endgroup$
– ryan
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@ryan k is constant. (I have edited the question to specify this)
$endgroup$
– rtheunissen
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a data structure that can perform a task $T$ in constant time, $O(1)$. However, every $k$th invocation requires $O(logn)$, where $k$ is constant.
Is it possible for this task to ever take amortized constant time, or is it impossible because the logarithm will eventually become greater than $k$?
If an upper bound for $n$ is known as $N$, can $k$ be chosen to be less than $logN$?
algorithm-analysis runtime-analysis amortized-analysis
$endgroup$
I have a data structure that can perform a task $T$ in constant time, $O(1)$. However, every $k$th invocation requires $O(logn)$, where $k$ is constant.
Is it possible for this task to ever take amortized constant time, or is it impossible because the logarithm will eventually become greater than $k$?
If an upper bound for $n$ is known as $N$, can $k$ be chosen to be less than $logN$?
algorithm-analysis runtime-analysis amortized-analysis
algorithm-analysis runtime-analysis amortized-analysis
edited 2 hours ago
rtheunissen
asked 4 hours ago
rtheunissenrtheunissen
1304
1304
1
$begingroup$
It depends on how $k$ relates to $n$. For instance $k=2$ then this will not matter and $n$ operations will take $O(n log n)$. If $k = n$ then after $n$ operations we have time $O(n + log n)$. How does $k$ relate to $n$?
$endgroup$
– ryan
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@ryan k is constant. (I have edited the question to specify this)
$endgroup$
– rtheunissen
2 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
It depends on how $k$ relates to $n$. For instance $k=2$ then this will not matter and $n$ operations will take $O(n log n)$. If $k = n$ then after $n$ operations we have time $O(n + log n)$. How does $k$ relate to $n$?
$endgroup$
– ryan
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@ryan k is constant. (I have edited the question to specify this)
$endgroup$
– rtheunissen
2 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
It depends on how $k$ relates to $n$. For instance $k=2$ then this will not matter and $n$ operations will take $O(n log n)$. If $k = n$ then after $n$ operations we have time $O(n + log n)$. How does $k$ relate to $n$?
$endgroup$
– ryan
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
It depends on how $k$ relates to $n$. For instance $k=2$ then this will not matter and $n$ operations will take $O(n log n)$. If $k = n$ then after $n$ operations we have time $O(n + log n)$. How does $k$ relate to $n$?
$endgroup$
– ryan
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@ryan k is constant. (I have edited the question to specify this)
$endgroup$
– rtheunissen
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@ryan k is constant. (I have edited the question to specify this)
$endgroup$
– rtheunissen
2 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If every $k$th operation takes $O(log n)$ time, then the best bound you can get on the amortized complexity is $O(1 + fraclog nk)$. This follows from the definition of amortized complexity.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Does that mean that if k is constant, the amortized complexity is O(1 + (log n / k))?
$endgroup$
– rtheunissen
2 hours ago
6
$begingroup$
If $k$ is constant, the amortized complexity is $O(log n)$.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@YuvalFilmus might want to note that this is per step, the overall complexity cannot be better than O(n)
$endgroup$
– Frank Hopkins
3 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "419"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106957%2fcomplexity-of-many-constant-time-steps-with-occasional-logarithmic-steps%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If every $k$th operation takes $O(log n)$ time, then the best bound you can get on the amortized complexity is $O(1 + fraclog nk)$. This follows from the definition of amortized complexity.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Does that mean that if k is constant, the amortized complexity is O(1 + (log n / k))?
$endgroup$
– rtheunissen
2 hours ago
6
$begingroup$
If $k$ is constant, the amortized complexity is $O(log n)$.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@YuvalFilmus might want to note that this is per step, the overall complexity cannot be better than O(n)
$endgroup$
– Frank Hopkins
3 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If every $k$th operation takes $O(log n)$ time, then the best bound you can get on the amortized complexity is $O(1 + fraclog nk)$. This follows from the definition of amortized complexity.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Does that mean that if k is constant, the amortized complexity is O(1 + (log n / k))?
$endgroup$
– rtheunissen
2 hours ago
6
$begingroup$
If $k$ is constant, the amortized complexity is $O(log n)$.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@YuvalFilmus might want to note that this is per step, the overall complexity cannot be better than O(n)
$endgroup$
– Frank Hopkins
3 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If every $k$th operation takes $O(log n)$ time, then the best bound you can get on the amortized complexity is $O(1 + fraclog nk)$. This follows from the definition of amortized complexity.
$endgroup$
If every $k$th operation takes $O(log n)$ time, then the best bound you can get on the amortized complexity is $O(1 + fraclog nk)$. This follows from the definition of amortized complexity.
answered 3 hours ago
Yuval FilmusYuval Filmus
197k15185349
197k15185349
$begingroup$
Does that mean that if k is constant, the amortized complexity is O(1 + (log n / k))?
$endgroup$
– rtheunissen
2 hours ago
6
$begingroup$
If $k$ is constant, the amortized complexity is $O(log n)$.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@YuvalFilmus might want to note that this is per step, the overall complexity cannot be better than O(n)
$endgroup$
– Frank Hopkins
3 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Does that mean that if k is constant, the amortized complexity is O(1 + (log n / k))?
$endgroup$
– rtheunissen
2 hours ago
6
$begingroup$
If $k$ is constant, the amortized complexity is $O(log n)$.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@YuvalFilmus might want to note that this is per step, the overall complexity cannot be better than O(n)
$endgroup$
– Frank Hopkins
3 mins ago
$begingroup$
Does that mean that if k is constant, the amortized complexity is O(1 + (log n / k))?
$endgroup$
– rtheunissen
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Does that mean that if k is constant, the amortized complexity is O(1 + (log n / k))?
$endgroup$
– rtheunissen
2 hours ago
6
6
$begingroup$
If $k$ is constant, the amortized complexity is $O(log n)$.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
If $k$ is constant, the amortized complexity is $O(log n)$.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@YuvalFilmus might want to note that this is per step, the overall complexity cannot be better than O(n)
$endgroup$
– Frank Hopkins
3 mins ago
$begingroup$
@YuvalFilmus might want to note that this is per step, the overall complexity cannot be better than O(n)
$endgroup$
– Frank Hopkins
3 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Computer Science Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106957%2fcomplexity-of-many-constant-time-steps-with-occasional-logarithmic-steps%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
It depends on how $k$ relates to $n$. For instance $k=2$ then this will not matter and $n$ operations will take $O(n log n)$. If $k = n$ then after $n$ operations we have time $O(n + log n)$. How does $k$ relate to $n$?
$endgroup$
– ryan
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@ryan k is constant. (I have edited the question to specify this)
$endgroup$
– rtheunissen
2 hours ago