Okay to merge included columns on otherwise identical indexes? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)SQL server indexing foreign keys, covering indexes included columnsdifference between having many non clustered index with single columns and with combination of many columnsTwo identical MySQL tables, one not using indexesAre these indexes redundant?Does Index Intersection work with Included Columns?Effect of an index on update statements where update column is not in an indexSQL Server : Included columns in an Index: is there something like “too many”?Any reason to have both an index with included columns and one without?Index creation with multiple columns - should I combine as many as possible?Table/Column Character Encoding and Indexes

What is the logic behind the Maharil's explanation of why we don't say שעשה ניסים on Pesach?

How widely used is the term Treppenwitz? Is it something that most Germans know?

How does debian/ubuntu knows a package has a updated version

Is the Standard Deduction better than Itemized when both are the same amount?

Echoing a tail command produces unexpected output?

English words in a non-english sci-fi novel

What is Arya's weapon design?

How discoverable are IPv6 addresses and AAAA names by potential attackers?

In predicate logic, does existential quantification (∃) include universal quantification (∀), i.e. can 'some' imply 'all'?

List of Python versions

How to answer "Have you ever been terminated?"

What exactly is a "Meth" in Altered Carbon?

What does an IRS interview request entail when called in to verify expenses for a sole proprietor small business?

How to align text above triangle figure

When a candle burns, why does the top of wick glow if bottom of flame is hottest?

Can I cast Passwall to drop an enemy into a 20-foot pit?

How to override model in magento2?

Sci-Fi book where patients in a coma ward all live in a subconscious world linked together

Can a non-EU citizen traveling with me come with me through the EU passport line?

How to tell that you are a giant?

Extract all GPU name, model and GPU ram

porting install scripts : can rpm replace apt?

How can I make names more distinctive without making them longer?

Short Story with Cinderella as a Voo-doo Witch



Okay to merge included columns on otherwise identical indexes?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)SQL server indexing foreign keys, covering indexes included columnsdifference between having many non clustered index with single columns and with combination of many columnsTwo identical MySQL tables, one not using indexesAre these indexes redundant?Does Index Intersection work with Included Columns?Effect of an index on update statements where update column is not in an indexSQL Server : Included columns in an Index: is there something like “too many”?Any reason to have both an index with included columns and one without?Index creation with multiple columns - should I combine as many as possible?Table/Column Character Encoding and Indexes



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3















I have two indexes that index the same field on the same table. The only difference between them is the included columns.



There's no reason I shouldn't combine the included columns and just have one index, right?










share|improve this question




























    3















    I have two indexes that index the same field on the same table. The only difference between them is the included columns.



    There's no reason I shouldn't combine the included columns and just have one index, right?










    share|improve this question
























      3












      3








      3








      I have two indexes that index the same field on the same table. The only difference between them is the included columns.



      There's no reason I shouldn't combine the included columns and just have one index, right?










      share|improve this question














      I have two indexes that index the same field on the same table. The only difference between them is the included columns.



      There's no reason I shouldn't combine the included columns and just have one index, right?







      sql-server index






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 7 hours ago









      BVernonBVernon

      218413




      218413




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5














          Yes, you should merge these indexes and only keep one, as long as you verify that:



          • Neither of them are marked as UNIQUE (in which case, preserve that one)


          • Neither of them have a filter condition


          • Neither of them are expressly referenced in an index hint






          share|improve this answer























          • Thanks. I just combined like 5 indexes and shed close to a gigabyte of data, lol. :)

            – BVernon
            5 hours ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "182"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f234982%2fokay-to-merge-included-columns-on-otherwise-identical-indexes%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          5














          Yes, you should merge these indexes and only keep one, as long as you verify that:



          • Neither of them are marked as UNIQUE (in which case, preserve that one)


          • Neither of them have a filter condition


          • Neither of them are expressly referenced in an index hint






          share|improve this answer























          • Thanks. I just combined like 5 indexes and shed close to a gigabyte of data, lol. :)

            – BVernon
            5 hours ago















          5














          Yes, you should merge these indexes and only keep one, as long as you verify that:



          • Neither of them are marked as UNIQUE (in which case, preserve that one)


          • Neither of them have a filter condition


          • Neither of them are expressly referenced in an index hint






          share|improve this answer























          • Thanks. I just combined like 5 indexes and shed close to a gigabyte of data, lol. :)

            – BVernon
            5 hours ago













          5












          5








          5







          Yes, you should merge these indexes and only keep one, as long as you verify that:



          • Neither of them are marked as UNIQUE (in which case, preserve that one)


          • Neither of them have a filter condition


          • Neither of them are expressly referenced in an index hint






          share|improve this answer













          Yes, you should merge these indexes and only keep one, as long as you verify that:



          • Neither of them are marked as UNIQUE (in which case, preserve that one)


          • Neither of them have a filter condition


          • Neither of them are expressly referenced in an index hint







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 6 hours ago









          Erik DarlingErik Darling

          22.9k1269113




          22.9k1269113












          • Thanks. I just combined like 5 indexes and shed close to a gigabyte of data, lol. :)

            – BVernon
            5 hours ago

















          • Thanks. I just combined like 5 indexes and shed close to a gigabyte of data, lol. :)

            – BVernon
            5 hours ago
















          Thanks. I just combined like 5 indexes and shed close to a gigabyte of data, lol. :)

          – BVernon
          5 hours ago





          Thanks. I just combined like 5 indexes and shed close to a gigabyte of data, lol. :)

          – BVernon
          5 hours ago

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f234982%2fokay-to-merge-included-columns-on-otherwise-identical-indexes%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

          Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

          Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її