Likelihood that a superbug or lethal virus could come from a landfill The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InCan I create an unstoppable disease?Could there exist a quantum virus which breaks someone's body down to fundamental particles?Completely antiviral resistant, possible?A realistic explanation of a typical Plague-inc “infect everyone before you start killing them” strategyReasons why healthy people would intentionally want to get infected?Identifying an engineered virusOdds of survivability when encountering new bacteria in Earth-like planet's atmosphere?Could a virus that just kills plants be the end of us all?How could a seemingly-harmless virus become deadly at a predetermined date and time?In theory, could all mammals be wiped out by a single pathogen?
Is it okay to consider publishing in my first year of PhD?
Will it cause any balance problems to have PCs level up and gain the benefits of a long rest mid-fight?
How to translate "being like"?
Can we generate random numbers using irrational numbers like π and e?
Relationship between Gromov-Witten and Taubes' Gromov invariant
Is bread bad for ducks?
Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?
What is this sharp, curved notch on my knife for?
How come people say “Would of”?
Loose spokes after only a few rides
How to notate time signature switching consistently every measure
I am an eight letter word. What am I?
Keeping a retro style to sci-fi spaceships?
Match Roman Numerals
Did any laptop computers have a built-in 5 1/4 inch floppy drive?
Why “相同意思的词” is called “同义词” instead of "同意词"?
Likelihood that a superbug or lethal virus could come from a landfill
What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?
APIPA and LAN Broadcast Domain
Output the Arecibo Message
How do PCB vias affect signal quality?
Why couldn't they take pictures of a closer black hole?
Is it ethical to upload a automatically generated paper to a non peer-reviewed site as part of a larger research?
How to obtain a position of last non-zero element
Likelihood that a superbug or lethal virus could come from a landfill
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InCan I create an unstoppable disease?Could there exist a quantum virus which breaks someone's body down to fundamental particles?Completely antiviral resistant, possible?A realistic explanation of a typical Plague-inc “infect everyone before you start killing them” strategyReasons why healthy people would intentionally want to get infected?Identifying an engineered virusOdds of survivability when encountering new bacteria in Earth-like planet's atmosphere?Could a virus that just kills plants be the end of us all?How could a seemingly-harmless virus become deadly at a predetermined date and time?In theory, could all mammals be wiped out by a single pathogen?
$begingroup$
Landfills seem like disgusting, nasty places that could be breeding grounds for all sorts of viruses and bacteria. What is the likelihood that the next lethal superbug or virus (like Ebola) could originate there?
society diseases viruses bacteria
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Landfills seem like disgusting, nasty places that could be breeding grounds for all sorts of viruses and bacteria. What is the likelihood that the next lethal superbug or virus (like Ebola) could originate there?
society diseases viruses bacteria
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Landfills seem like disgusting, nasty places that could be breeding grounds for all sorts of viruses and bacteria. What is the likelihood that the next lethal superbug or virus (like Ebola) could originate there?
society diseases viruses bacteria
New contributor
$endgroup$
Landfills seem like disgusting, nasty places that could be breeding grounds for all sorts of viruses and bacteria. What is the likelihood that the next lethal superbug or virus (like Ebola) could originate there?
society diseases viruses bacteria
society diseases viruses bacteria
New contributor
New contributor
edited 1 hour ago
Cyn
11.2k12454
11.2k12454
New contributor
asked 5 hours ago
bremen_mattbremen_matt
1293
1293
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Slim.
Superbugs seem to come in roughly two flavours... things resistant to treatment, and new diseases our immune systems aren't familiar with.
The former comes from places where large numbers of people get together and use antibiotics excessively and/or incorrectly. You end up with new flavours of old favourites, like totally drug resistant TB.
The latter are often zoonoses. The likes of ebola, HIV and swine flu are animal pathogens that jumped the species barrier and proved to be a little too effective in their new environments. You get novel zoonoses where people and animals spend a time together in unsanitary conditions.
Landfills describe neither of those things. Unless it is a waste dump for surplus and expired antibiotics, there's not much pressure on landfill microbes to develop and maintain drug resistance. Not too many exotic animals frequent landfills, and humans don't tend to hunt or farm there.
I'm not saying it is impossible but, y'know, there's not much reason to think it'll happen, and every reason to think there will instead be an outbreak of a new kind of flu or haemorrhagic fever or an old kind of disease suddenly becomes treatment resistant and goes on a bit of a spree instead. If you wanted ideas for somewhere else, I'd be looking at places that do cheap, massive-scale meat production.
(Also, viruses and bacteria get all the press, but there are other unpleasant things you can catch more and more easily these days. Rat lungworm, anyone?)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
In Germany, we also have special recycling just for food waste. I imagine that a sick person eats an apple, puts the core in this recycling, and then when this infected apple meets the apple core of another person infected with some fun thing, these two viruses combine to make something really scary. Plausible?
$endgroup$
– bremen_matt
5 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@bremen_matt the problem is that you need something that is capable of infecting humans and spending a long time in an environment that doesn't have a lot of humans in, but does have a lot of other microbes that are better suited to survival there and that are consuming all the resources. Viruses are pretty much right out, because they have a fairly limited lifespan outside of a human. Viruses are also ill-suited to exchange DNA outside of a human. Sewage treatment facilities might be a good place to breed antibiotic resistant enterobacteria, though.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@bremen_matt and whilst I'm always happy to be marked as the official accepted answer, it is generally considered best to wait 24-48 hours before doing so because there's a chance that someone in another timezone or who is at work may happen by later and give a much better answer. Your question has only been up 30 minutes so far ;-)
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
5 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Don't click that lungworm link. Excuse me while I go wash my vegetables some more.
$endgroup$
– Innovine
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
This answer deserves a bounty.
$endgroup$
– Renan
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Starfish Prime explained why the chance of superbugs developing in a landfill site are unlikely.
However that does not mean that a landfill site could not play a significant part in the development of a superbug.
If badly processed human or animal waste (e.g. from a hospital or farm) were being dumped into a poorly contained landfill site, such as a site where runoff was escaping into human water supplies, this could play a very significant part in the genesis of a superbug.
While the bug actually developed on the farm or in the hospital, as an animal disease or drug resistant strain, the landfill acts as a launching ground releasing the bug to huge numbers of victims.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This was my first thought, clinical waste that's not gotten incinerated as it should be - maybe in a third world country or a recession or profit driven business in a first world one that won't pay for safe practices. There are people in old-folks-homes who've been on antibiotics for years incubating these things. +1
$endgroup$
– Agrajag
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Did you know Mammoth tusks were found among illegal markets?
Global warming is uncovering large swathes of Siberia, where innumerable pieces of animal carcasses are decomposing.
All you need is for one of those fellas to get a bug.
They usually don't have good hygiene. Ton of hands touching the same sample and you also must take into account that poor families statistically bear more children.
So you have a possible source, a vulnerable population and the means to travel the globe as contraband.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Eh, I'm not worried about ancient diseases being defrosted. The microbes that didn't get frozen have spent thousands upon thousands of years fighting against each other and immune systems and eventually medical treatments that get better all the time. The mammoth germs have lost their principal host, possibly forever. They're like vikings being unfrozen in the present day; dangerous perhaps, but not much good against modern defences.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes and no. There are plenty of species which changes relatively few times in all that timespan. Some birds may be close to their ancestors, such the case of aligators, which havn't changed since the dinosaurs roamed the earth.
$endgroup$
– Gustavo Almeida
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You could definitely make this the premise of a story.
- Third world abandoned laboratory is cleaned up by new government.
source
Bags of assorted mysterious stuff are sent to landfill with no processing or sterilization.
In landfill, bioengineered spores (anthrax? gangrene?) find new rodent hosts.
Landfill scavengers are exposed and bring disease back to favela.
It begins...
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The reality is that landfills are not places we dump our trash and then leave alone (or maybe move around with machinery).
People live on landfills. Not just former/covered ones, but real live ones.
People scavenge there.
Children run around barefoot and play in piles of garbage.
People eat food they find in landfills.
(People in garbage landfill. Mexico)
(Cambodia children living in Garbage Dumps)
We already know there are dangers to living within 5 kilometers of a landfill. Hydrogen sulphide gas and other toxins. Toxins aren't "bugs" but they can lower your resistance. Cancer and birth defect rates go way up as well.
So what about diseases caused by viruses or bacteria?
Yes. Unfortunately.
One of the most basic hygiene problems that haunt developing
communities is lack of adequate toilets...People defecate in the open — in fields, bushes and bodies of water —
putting themselves and their community in danger of fecal-oral
diseases, like hepatitis, cholera and dysentery.
Children are especially susceptible to these diseases when their home
and “playgrounds” are overrun with rubbish and human waste. In
countries throughout Asia, children can be seen swimming in polluted
stagnant waters, digging through trash and playing amid toxic
substances at landfills.
The pictures in this PBS article are staggering. Landfills are vectors of disease and people who have no choice but to live on or next to them generally do not have safe toilets/sewage and their water supplies are usually contaminated as well. In some places, entire communities are garbage dumps and people are too poor to move or fight the influx of refuse.
What are the chances that the next Superbug will come from a landfill? Quite possible. Once it spreads in the community living there, it can easily extend its reach beyond that. Combine a landfill with waste from something like factory farms, which use massive amounts of antibiotics (including in the rural 3rd world; most factory fish farms are in those places (Vietnam, for example) and they use tons of antibiotics and pesticides and more). It would be another post to describe how antibiotic use in animals leads to disease in humans but, suffice it to say, it's already happened.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
bremen_matt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143813%2flikelihood-that-a-superbug-or-lethal-virus-could-come-from-a-landfill%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Slim.
Superbugs seem to come in roughly two flavours... things resistant to treatment, and new diseases our immune systems aren't familiar with.
The former comes from places where large numbers of people get together and use antibiotics excessively and/or incorrectly. You end up with new flavours of old favourites, like totally drug resistant TB.
The latter are often zoonoses. The likes of ebola, HIV and swine flu are animal pathogens that jumped the species barrier and proved to be a little too effective in their new environments. You get novel zoonoses where people and animals spend a time together in unsanitary conditions.
Landfills describe neither of those things. Unless it is a waste dump for surplus and expired antibiotics, there's not much pressure on landfill microbes to develop and maintain drug resistance. Not too many exotic animals frequent landfills, and humans don't tend to hunt or farm there.
I'm not saying it is impossible but, y'know, there's not much reason to think it'll happen, and every reason to think there will instead be an outbreak of a new kind of flu or haemorrhagic fever or an old kind of disease suddenly becomes treatment resistant and goes on a bit of a spree instead. If you wanted ideas for somewhere else, I'd be looking at places that do cheap, massive-scale meat production.
(Also, viruses and bacteria get all the press, but there are other unpleasant things you can catch more and more easily these days. Rat lungworm, anyone?)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
In Germany, we also have special recycling just for food waste. I imagine that a sick person eats an apple, puts the core in this recycling, and then when this infected apple meets the apple core of another person infected with some fun thing, these two viruses combine to make something really scary. Plausible?
$endgroup$
– bremen_matt
5 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@bremen_matt the problem is that you need something that is capable of infecting humans and spending a long time in an environment that doesn't have a lot of humans in, but does have a lot of other microbes that are better suited to survival there and that are consuming all the resources. Viruses are pretty much right out, because they have a fairly limited lifespan outside of a human. Viruses are also ill-suited to exchange DNA outside of a human. Sewage treatment facilities might be a good place to breed antibiotic resistant enterobacteria, though.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@bremen_matt and whilst I'm always happy to be marked as the official accepted answer, it is generally considered best to wait 24-48 hours before doing so because there's a chance that someone in another timezone or who is at work may happen by later and give a much better answer. Your question has only been up 30 minutes so far ;-)
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
5 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Don't click that lungworm link. Excuse me while I go wash my vegetables some more.
$endgroup$
– Innovine
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
This answer deserves a bounty.
$endgroup$
– Renan
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Slim.
Superbugs seem to come in roughly two flavours... things resistant to treatment, and new diseases our immune systems aren't familiar with.
The former comes from places where large numbers of people get together and use antibiotics excessively and/or incorrectly. You end up with new flavours of old favourites, like totally drug resistant TB.
The latter are often zoonoses. The likes of ebola, HIV and swine flu are animal pathogens that jumped the species barrier and proved to be a little too effective in their new environments. You get novel zoonoses where people and animals spend a time together in unsanitary conditions.
Landfills describe neither of those things. Unless it is a waste dump for surplus and expired antibiotics, there's not much pressure on landfill microbes to develop and maintain drug resistance. Not too many exotic animals frequent landfills, and humans don't tend to hunt or farm there.
I'm not saying it is impossible but, y'know, there's not much reason to think it'll happen, and every reason to think there will instead be an outbreak of a new kind of flu or haemorrhagic fever or an old kind of disease suddenly becomes treatment resistant and goes on a bit of a spree instead. If you wanted ideas for somewhere else, I'd be looking at places that do cheap, massive-scale meat production.
(Also, viruses and bacteria get all the press, but there are other unpleasant things you can catch more and more easily these days. Rat lungworm, anyone?)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
In Germany, we also have special recycling just for food waste. I imagine that a sick person eats an apple, puts the core in this recycling, and then when this infected apple meets the apple core of another person infected with some fun thing, these two viruses combine to make something really scary. Plausible?
$endgroup$
– bremen_matt
5 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@bremen_matt the problem is that you need something that is capable of infecting humans and spending a long time in an environment that doesn't have a lot of humans in, but does have a lot of other microbes that are better suited to survival there and that are consuming all the resources. Viruses are pretty much right out, because they have a fairly limited lifespan outside of a human. Viruses are also ill-suited to exchange DNA outside of a human. Sewage treatment facilities might be a good place to breed antibiotic resistant enterobacteria, though.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@bremen_matt and whilst I'm always happy to be marked as the official accepted answer, it is generally considered best to wait 24-48 hours before doing so because there's a chance that someone in another timezone or who is at work may happen by later and give a much better answer. Your question has only been up 30 minutes so far ;-)
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
5 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Don't click that lungworm link. Excuse me while I go wash my vegetables some more.
$endgroup$
– Innovine
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
This answer deserves a bounty.
$endgroup$
– Renan
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Slim.
Superbugs seem to come in roughly two flavours... things resistant to treatment, and new diseases our immune systems aren't familiar with.
The former comes from places where large numbers of people get together and use antibiotics excessively and/or incorrectly. You end up with new flavours of old favourites, like totally drug resistant TB.
The latter are often zoonoses. The likes of ebola, HIV and swine flu are animal pathogens that jumped the species barrier and proved to be a little too effective in their new environments. You get novel zoonoses where people and animals spend a time together in unsanitary conditions.
Landfills describe neither of those things. Unless it is a waste dump for surplus and expired antibiotics, there's not much pressure on landfill microbes to develop and maintain drug resistance. Not too many exotic animals frequent landfills, and humans don't tend to hunt or farm there.
I'm not saying it is impossible but, y'know, there's not much reason to think it'll happen, and every reason to think there will instead be an outbreak of a new kind of flu or haemorrhagic fever or an old kind of disease suddenly becomes treatment resistant and goes on a bit of a spree instead. If you wanted ideas for somewhere else, I'd be looking at places that do cheap, massive-scale meat production.
(Also, viruses and bacteria get all the press, but there are other unpleasant things you can catch more and more easily these days. Rat lungworm, anyone?)
$endgroup$
Slim.
Superbugs seem to come in roughly two flavours... things resistant to treatment, and new diseases our immune systems aren't familiar with.
The former comes from places where large numbers of people get together and use antibiotics excessively and/or incorrectly. You end up with new flavours of old favourites, like totally drug resistant TB.
The latter are often zoonoses. The likes of ebola, HIV and swine flu are animal pathogens that jumped the species barrier and proved to be a little too effective in their new environments. You get novel zoonoses where people and animals spend a time together in unsanitary conditions.
Landfills describe neither of those things. Unless it is a waste dump for surplus and expired antibiotics, there's not much pressure on landfill microbes to develop and maintain drug resistance. Not too many exotic animals frequent landfills, and humans don't tend to hunt or farm there.
I'm not saying it is impossible but, y'know, there's not much reason to think it'll happen, and every reason to think there will instead be an outbreak of a new kind of flu or haemorrhagic fever or an old kind of disease suddenly becomes treatment resistant and goes on a bit of a spree instead. If you wanted ideas for somewhere else, I'd be looking at places that do cheap, massive-scale meat production.
(Also, viruses and bacteria get all the press, but there are other unpleasant things you can catch more and more easily these days. Rat lungworm, anyone?)
answered 5 hours ago
Starfish PrimeStarfish Prime
1,04112
1,04112
$begingroup$
In Germany, we also have special recycling just for food waste. I imagine that a sick person eats an apple, puts the core in this recycling, and then when this infected apple meets the apple core of another person infected with some fun thing, these two viruses combine to make something really scary. Plausible?
$endgroup$
– bremen_matt
5 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@bremen_matt the problem is that you need something that is capable of infecting humans and spending a long time in an environment that doesn't have a lot of humans in, but does have a lot of other microbes that are better suited to survival there and that are consuming all the resources. Viruses are pretty much right out, because they have a fairly limited lifespan outside of a human. Viruses are also ill-suited to exchange DNA outside of a human. Sewage treatment facilities might be a good place to breed antibiotic resistant enterobacteria, though.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@bremen_matt and whilst I'm always happy to be marked as the official accepted answer, it is generally considered best to wait 24-48 hours before doing so because there's a chance that someone in another timezone or who is at work may happen by later and give a much better answer. Your question has only been up 30 minutes so far ;-)
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
5 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Don't click that lungworm link. Excuse me while I go wash my vegetables some more.
$endgroup$
– Innovine
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
This answer deserves a bounty.
$endgroup$
– Renan
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In Germany, we also have special recycling just for food waste. I imagine that a sick person eats an apple, puts the core in this recycling, and then when this infected apple meets the apple core of another person infected with some fun thing, these two viruses combine to make something really scary. Plausible?
$endgroup$
– bremen_matt
5 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@bremen_matt the problem is that you need something that is capable of infecting humans and spending a long time in an environment that doesn't have a lot of humans in, but does have a lot of other microbes that are better suited to survival there and that are consuming all the resources. Viruses are pretty much right out, because they have a fairly limited lifespan outside of a human. Viruses are also ill-suited to exchange DNA outside of a human. Sewage treatment facilities might be a good place to breed antibiotic resistant enterobacteria, though.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@bremen_matt and whilst I'm always happy to be marked as the official accepted answer, it is generally considered best to wait 24-48 hours before doing so because there's a chance that someone in another timezone or who is at work may happen by later and give a much better answer. Your question has only been up 30 minutes so far ;-)
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
5 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Don't click that lungworm link. Excuse me while I go wash my vegetables some more.
$endgroup$
– Innovine
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
This answer deserves a bounty.
$endgroup$
– Renan
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
In Germany, we also have special recycling just for food waste. I imagine that a sick person eats an apple, puts the core in this recycling, and then when this infected apple meets the apple core of another person infected with some fun thing, these two viruses combine to make something really scary. Plausible?
$endgroup$
– bremen_matt
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
In Germany, we also have special recycling just for food waste. I imagine that a sick person eats an apple, puts the core in this recycling, and then when this infected apple meets the apple core of another person infected with some fun thing, these two viruses combine to make something really scary. Plausible?
$endgroup$
– bremen_matt
5 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@bremen_matt the problem is that you need something that is capable of infecting humans and spending a long time in an environment that doesn't have a lot of humans in, but does have a lot of other microbes that are better suited to survival there and that are consuming all the resources. Viruses are pretty much right out, because they have a fairly limited lifespan outside of a human. Viruses are also ill-suited to exchange DNA outside of a human. Sewage treatment facilities might be a good place to breed antibiotic resistant enterobacteria, though.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@bremen_matt the problem is that you need something that is capable of infecting humans and spending a long time in an environment that doesn't have a lot of humans in, but does have a lot of other microbes that are better suited to survival there and that are consuming all the resources. Viruses are pretty much right out, because they have a fairly limited lifespan outside of a human. Viruses are also ill-suited to exchange DNA outside of a human. Sewage treatment facilities might be a good place to breed antibiotic resistant enterobacteria, though.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@bremen_matt and whilst I'm always happy to be marked as the official accepted answer, it is generally considered best to wait 24-48 hours before doing so because there's a chance that someone in another timezone or who is at work may happen by later and give a much better answer. Your question has only been up 30 minutes so far ;-)
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@bremen_matt and whilst I'm always happy to be marked as the official accepted answer, it is generally considered best to wait 24-48 hours before doing so because there's a chance that someone in another timezone or who is at work may happen by later and give a much better answer. Your question has only been up 30 minutes so far ;-)
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
5 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
Don't click that lungworm link. Excuse me while I go wash my vegetables some more.
$endgroup$
– Innovine
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Don't click that lungworm link. Excuse me while I go wash my vegetables some more.
$endgroup$
– Innovine
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
This answer deserves a bounty.
$endgroup$
– Renan
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
This answer deserves a bounty.
$endgroup$
– Renan
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Starfish Prime explained why the chance of superbugs developing in a landfill site are unlikely.
However that does not mean that a landfill site could not play a significant part in the development of a superbug.
If badly processed human or animal waste (e.g. from a hospital or farm) were being dumped into a poorly contained landfill site, such as a site where runoff was escaping into human water supplies, this could play a very significant part in the genesis of a superbug.
While the bug actually developed on the farm or in the hospital, as an animal disease or drug resistant strain, the landfill acts as a launching ground releasing the bug to huge numbers of victims.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This was my first thought, clinical waste that's not gotten incinerated as it should be - maybe in a third world country or a recession or profit driven business in a first world one that won't pay for safe practices. There are people in old-folks-homes who've been on antibiotics for years incubating these things. +1
$endgroup$
– Agrajag
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Starfish Prime explained why the chance of superbugs developing in a landfill site are unlikely.
However that does not mean that a landfill site could not play a significant part in the development of a superbug.
If badly processed human or animal waste (e.g. from a hospital or farm) were being dumped into a poorly contained landfill site, such as a site where runoff was escaping into human water supplies, this could play a very significant part in the genesis of a superbug.
While the bug actually developed on the farm or in the hospital, as an animal disease or drug resistant strain, the landfill acts as a launching ground releasing the bug to huge numbers of victims.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This was my first thought, clinical waste that's not gotten incinerated as it should be - maybe in a third world country or a recession or profit driven business in a first world one that won't pay for safe practices. There are people in old-folks-homes who've been on antibiotics for years incubating these things. +1
$endgroup$
– Agrajag
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Starfish Prime explained why the chance of superbugs developing in a landfill site are unlikely.
However that does not mean that a landfill site could not play a significant part in the development of a superbug.
If badly processed human or animal waste (e.g. from a hospital or farm) were being dumped into a poorly contained landfill site, such as a site where runoff was escaping into human water supplies, this could play a very significant part in the genesis of a superbug.
While the bug actually developed on the farm or in the hospital, as an animal disease or drug resistant strain, the landfill acts as a launching ground releasing the bug to huge numbers of victims.
$endgroup$
Starfish Prime explained why the chance of superbugs developing in a landfill site are unlikely.
However that does not mean that a landfill site could not play a significant part in the development of a superbug.
If badly processed human or animal waste (e.g. from a hospital or farm) were being dumped into a poorly contained landfill site, such as a site where runoff was escaping into human water supplies, this could play a very significant part in the genesis of a superbug.
While the bug actually developed on the farm or in the hospital, as an animal disease or drug resistant strain, the landfill acts as a launching ground releasing the bug to huge numbers of victims.
answered 4 hours ago
BenBen
610216
610216
$begingroup$
This was my first thought, clinical waste that's not gotten incinerated as it should be - maybe in a third world country or a recession or profit driven business in a first world one that won't pay for safe practices. There are people in old-folks-homes who've been on antibiotics for years incubating these things. +1
$endgroup$
– Agrajag
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This was my first thought, clinical waste that's not gotten incinerated as it should be - maybe in a third world country or a recession or profit driven business in a first world one that won't pay for safe practices. There are people in old-folks-homes who've been on antibiotics for years incubating these things. +1
$endgroup$
– Agrajag
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
This was my first thought, clinical waste that's not gotten incinerated as it should be - maybe in a third world country or a recession or profit driven business in a first world one that won't pay for safe practices. There are people in old-folks-homes who've been on antibiotics for years incubating these things. +1
$endgroup$
– Agrajag
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
This was my first thought, clinical waste that's not gotten incinerated as it should be - maybe in a third world country or a recession or profit driven business in a first world one that won't pay for safe practices. There are people in old-folks-homes who've been on antibiotics for years incubating these things. +1
$endgroup$
– Agrajag
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Did you know Mammoth tusks were found among illegal markets?
Global warming is uncovering large swathes of Siberia, where innumerable pieces of animal carcasses are decomposing.
All you need is for one of those fellas to get a bug.
They usually don't have good hygiene. Ton of hands touching the same sample and you also must take into account that poor families statistically bear more children.
So you have a possible source, a vulnerable population and the means to travel the globe as contraband.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Eh, I'm not worried about ancient diseases being defrosted. The microbes that didn't get frozen have spent thousands upon thousands of years fighting against each other and immune systems and eventually medical treatments that get better all the time. The mammoth germs have lost their principal host, possibly forever. They're like vikings being unfrozen in the present day; dangerous perhaps, but not much good against modern defences.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes and no. There are plenty of species which changes relatively few times in all that timespan. Some birds may be close to their ancestors, such the case of aligators, which havn't changed since the dinosaurs roamed the earth.
$endgroup$
– Gustavo Almeida
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Did you know Mammoth tusks were found among illegal markets?
Global warming is uncovering large swathes of Siberia, where innumerable pieces of animal carcasses are decomposing.
All you need is for one of those fellas to get a bug.
They usually don't have good hygiene. Ton of hands touching the same sample and you also must take into account that poor families statistically bear more children.
So you have a possible source, a vulnerable population and the means to travel the globe as contraband.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Eh, I'm not worried about ancient diseases being defrosted. The microbes that didn't get frozen have spent thousands upon thousands of years fighting against each other and immune systems and eventually medical treatments that get better all the time. The mammoth germs have lost their principal host, possibly forever. They're like vikings being unfrozen in the present day; dangerous perhaps, but not much good against modern defences.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes and no. There are plenty of species which changes relatively few times in all that timespan. Some birds may be close to their ancestors, such the case of aligators, which havn't changed since the dinosaurs roamed the earth.
$endgroup$
– Gustavo Almeida
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Did you know Mammoth tusks were found among illegal markets?
Global warming is uncovering large swathes of Siberia, where innumerable pieces of animal carcasses are decomposing.
All you need is for one of those fellas to get a bug.
They usually don't have good hygiene. Ton of hands touching the same sample and you also must take into account that poor families statistically bear more children.
So you have a possible source, a vulnerable population and the means to travel the globe as contraband.
$endgroup$
Did you know Mammoth tusks were found among illegal markets?
Global warming is uncovering large swathes of Siberia, where innumerable pieces of animal carcasses are decomposing.
All you need is for one of those fellas to get a bug.
They usually don't have good hygiene. Ton of hands touching the same sample and you also must take into account that poor families statistically bear more children.
So you have a possible source, a vulnerable population and the means to travel the globe as contraband.
answered 4 hours ago
Gustavo AlmeidaGustavo Almeida
1,516112
1,516112
1
$begingroup$
Eh, I'm not worried about ancient diseases being defrosted. The microbes that didn't get frozen have spent thousands upon thousands of years fighting against each other and immune systems and eventually medical treatments that get better all the time. The mammoth germs have lost their principal host, possibly forever. They're like vikings being unfrozen in the present day; dangerous perhaps, but not much good against modern defences.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes and no. There are plenty of species which changes relatively few times in all that timespan. Some birds may be close to their ancestors, such the case of aligators, which havn't changed since the dinosaurs roamed the earth.
$endgroup$
– Gustavo Almeida
4 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Eh, I'm not worried about ancient diseases being defrosted. The microbes that didn't get frozen have spent thousands upon thousands of years fighting against each other and immune systems and eventually medical treatments that get better all the time. The mammoth germs have lost their principal host, possibly forever. They're like vikings being unfrozen in the present day; dangerous perhaps, but not much good against modern defences.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes and no. There are plenty of species which changes relatively few times in all that timespan. Some birds may be close to their ancestors, such the case of aligators, which havn't changed since the dinosaurs roamed the earth.
$endgroup$
– Gustavo Almeida
4 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Eh, I'm not worried about ancient diseases being defrosted. The microbes that didn't get frozen have spent thousands upon thousands of years fighting against each other and immune systems and eventually medical treatments that get better all the time. The mammoth germs have lost their principal host, possibly forever. They're like vikings being unfrozen in the present day; dangerous perhaps, but not much good against modern defences.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Eh, I'm not worried about ancient diseases being defrosted. The microbes that didn't get frozen have spent thousands upon thousands of years fighting against each other and immune systems and eventually medical treatments that get better all the time. The mammoth germs have lost their principal host, possibly forever. They're like vikings being unfrozen in the present day; dangerous perhaps, but not much good against modern defences.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes and no. There are plenty of species which changes relatively few times in all that timespan. Some birds may be close to their ancestors, such the case of aligators, which havn't changed since the dinosaurs roamed the earth.
$endgroup$
– Gustavo Almeida
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes and no. There are plenty of species which changes relatively few times in all that timespan. Some birds may be close to their ancestors, such the case of aligators, which havn't changed since the dinosaurs roamed the earth.
$endgroup$
– Gustavo Almeida
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You could definitely make this the premise of a story.
- Third world abandoned laboratory is cleaned up by new government.
source
Bags of assorted mysterious stuff are sent to landfill with no processing or sterilization.
In landfill, bioengineered spores (anthrax? gangrene?) find new rodent hosts.
Landfill scavengers are exposed and bring disease back to favela.
It begins...
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You could definitely make this the premise of a story.
- Third world abandoned laboratory is cleaned up by new government.
source
Bags of assorted mysterious stuff are sent to landfill with no processing or sterilization.
In landfill, bioengineered spores (anthrax? gangrene?) find new rodent hosts.
Landfill scavengers are exposed and bring disease back to favela.
It begins...
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You could definitely make this the premise of a story.
- Third world abandoned laboratory is cleaned up by new government.
source
Bags of assorted mysterious stuff are sent to landfill with no processing or sterilization.
In landfill, bioengineered spores (anthrax? gangrene?) find new rodent hosts.
Landfill scavengers are exposed and bring disease back to favela.
It begins...
$endgroup$
You could definitely make this the premise of a story.
- Third world abandoned laboratory is cleaned up by new government.
source
Bags of assorted mysterious stuff are sent to landfill with no processing or sterilization.
In landfill, bioengineered spores (anthrax? gangrene?) find new rodent hosts.
Landfill scavengers are exposed and bring disease back to favela.
It begins...
answered 3 hours ago
WillkWillk
117k28221489
117k28221489
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The reality is that landfills are not places we dump our trash and then leave alone (or maybe move around with machinery).
People live on landfills. Not just former/covered ones, but real live ones.
People scavenge there.
Children run around barefoot and play in piles of garbage.
People eat food they find in landfills.
(People in garbage landfill. Mexico)
(Cambodia children living in Garbage Dumps)
We already know there are dangers to living within 5 kilometers of a landfill. Hydrogen sulphide gas and other toxins. Toxins aren't "bugs" but they can lower your resistance. Cancer and birth defect rates go way up as well.
So what about diseases caused by viruses or bacteria?
Yes. Unfortunately.
One of the most basic hygiene problems that haunt developing
communities is lack of adequate toilets...People defecate in the open — in fields, bushes and bodies of water —
putting themselves and their community in danger of fecal-oral
diseases, like hepatitis, cholera and dysentery.
Children are especially susceptible to these diseases when their home
and “playgrounds” are overrun with rubbish and human waste. In
countries throughout Asia, children can be seen swimming in polluted
stagnant waters, digging through trash and playing amid toxic
substances at landfills.
The pictures in this PBS article are staggering. Landfills are vectors of disease and people who have no choice but to live on or next to them generally do not have safe toilets/sewage and their water supplies are usually contaminated as well. In some places, entire communities are garbage dumps and people are too poor to move or fight the influx of refuse.
What are the chances that the next Superbug will come from a landfill? Quite possible. Once it spreads in the community living there, it can easily extend its reach beyond that. Combine a landfill with waste from something like factory farms, which use massive amounts of antibiotics (including in the rural 3rd world; most factory fish farms are in those places (Vietnam, for example) and they use tons of antibiotics and pesticides and more). It would be another post to describe how antibiotic use in animals leads to disease in humans but, suffice it to say, it's already happened.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The reality is that landfills are not places we dump our trash and then leave alone (or maybe move around with machinery).
People live on landfills. Not just former/covered ones, but real live ones.
People scavenge there.
Children run around barefoot and play in piles of garbage.
People eat food they find in landfills.
(People in garbage landfill. Mexico)
(Cambodia children living in Garbage Dumps)
We already know there are dangers to living within 5 kilometers of a landfill. Hydrogen sulphide gas and other toxins. Toxins aren't "bugs" but they can lower your resistance. Cancer and birth defect rates go way up as well.
So what about diseases caused by viruses or bacteria?
Yes. Unfortunately.
One of the most basic hygiene problems that haunt developing
communities is lack of adequate toilets...People defecate in the open — in fields, bushes and bodies of water —
putting themselves and their community in danger of fecal-oral
diseases, like hepatitis, cholera and dysentery.
Children are especially susceptible to these diseases when their home
and “playgrounds” are overrun with rubbish and human waste. In
countries throughout Asia, children can be seen swimming in polluted
stagnant waters, digging through trash and playing amid toxic
substances at landfills.
The pictures in this PBS article are staggering. Landfills are vectors of disease and people who have no choice but to live on or next to them generally do not have safe toilets/sewage and their water supplies are usually contaminated as well. In some places, entire communities are garbage dumps and people are too poor to move or fight the influx of refuse.
What are the chances that the next Superbug will come from a landfill? Quite possible. Once it spreads in the community living there, it can easily extend its reach beyond that. Combine a landfill with waste from something like factory farms, which use massive amounts of antibiotics (including in the rural 3rd world; most factory fish farms are in those places (Vietnam, for example) and they use tons of antibiotics and pesticides and more). It would be another post to describe how antibiotic use in animals leads to disease in humans but, suffice it to say, it's already happened.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The reality is that landfills are not places we dump our trash and then leave alone (or maybe move around with machinery).
People live on landfills. Not just former/covered ones, but real live ones.
People scavenge there.
Children run around barefoot and play in piles of garbage.
People eat food they find in landfills.
(People in garbage landfill. Mexico)
(Cambodia children living in Garbage Dumps)
We already know there are dangers to living within 5 kilometers of a landfill. Hydrogen sulphide gas and other toxins. Toxins aren't "bugs" but they can lower your resistance. Cancer and birth defect rates go way up as well.
So what about diseases caused by viruses or bacteria?
Yes. Unfortunately.
One of the most basic hygiene problems that haunt developing
communities is lack of adequate toilets...People defecate in the open — in fields, bushes and bodies of water —
putting themselves and their community in danger of fecal-oral
diseases, like hepatitis, cholera and dysentery.
Children are especially susceptible to these diseases when their home
and “playgrounds” are overrun with rubbish and human waste. In
countries throughout Asia, children can be seen swimming in polluted
stagnant waters, digging through trash and playing amid toxic
substances at landfills.
The pictures in this PBS article are staggering. Landfills are vectors of disease and people who have no choice but to live on or next to them generally do not have safe toilets/sewage and their water supplies are usually contaminated as well. In some places, entire communities are garbage dumps and people are too poor to move or fight the influx of refuse.
What are the chances that the next Superbug will come from a landfill? Quite possible. Once it spreads in the community living there, it can easily extend its reach beyond that. Combine a landfill with waste from something like factory farms, which use massive amounts of antibiotics (including in the rural 3rd world; most factory fish farms are in those places (Vietnam, for example) and they use tons of antibiotics and pesticides and more). It would be another post to describe how antibiotic use in animals leads to disease in humans but, suffice it to say, it's already happened.
$endgroup$
The reality is that landfills are not places we dump our trash and then leave alone (or maybe move around with machinery).
People live on landfills. Not just former/covered ones, but real live ones.
People scavenge there.
Children run around barefoot and play in piles of garbage.
People eat food they find in landfills.
(People in garbage landfill. Mexico)
(Cambodia children living in Garbage Dumps)
We already know there are dangers to living within 5 kilometers of a landfill. Hydrogen sulphide gas and other toxins. Toxins aren't "bugs" but they can lower your resistance. Cancer and birth defect rates go way up as well.
So what about diseases caused by viruses or bacteria?
Yes. Unfortunately.
One of the most basic hygiene problems that haunt developing
communities is lack of adequate toilets...People defecate in the open — in fields, bushes and bodies of water —
putting themselves and their community in danger of fecal-oral
diseases, like hepatitis, cholera and dysentery.
Children are especially susceptible to these diseases when their home
and “playgrounds” are overrun with rubbish and human waste. In
countries throughout Asia, children can be seen swimming in polluted
stagnant waters, digging through trash and playing amid toxic
substances at landfills.
The pictures in this PBS article are staggering. Landfills are vectors of disease and people who have no choice but to live on or next to them generally do not have safe toilets/sewage and their water supplies are usually contaminated as well. In some places, entire communities are garbage dumps and people are too poor to move or fight the influx of refuse.
What are the chances that the next Superbug will come from a landfill? Quite possible. Once it spreads in the community living there, it can easily extend its reach beyond that. Combine a landfill with waste from something like factory farms, which use massive amounts of antibiotics (including in the rural 3rd world; most factory fish farms are in those places (Vietnam, for example) and they use tons of antibiotics and pesticides and more). It would be another post to describe how antibiotic use in animals leads to disease in humans but, suffice it to say, it's already happened.
answered 1 hour ago
CynCyn
11.2k12454
11.2k12454
add a comment |
add a comment |
bremen_matt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
bremen_matt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
bremen_matt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
bremen_matt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143813%2flikelihood-that-a-superbug-or-lethal-virus-could-come-from-a-landfill%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown