How to calculate partition Start End Sector?Disk problems prevent me from booting, or set the disk to read-only. How do I fix the disk?How to format a 1GB USB stick to FAT32 with 512 bytes sector?Expanding root partition CentOS 6 With using fdiskHow to extend logical & extended partition with fdiskExtend partition using LVMHost unreachable after resizing partitionCorrupted ntfs volume mounting problemI have a dedicated with 2 SSDs, how to I group them to behave as 1?Wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdXExternal HDD failure due to bad blocks

What are these boxed doors outside store fronts in New York?

Collect Fourier series terms

A newer friend of my brother's gave him a load of baseball cards that are supposedly extremely valuable. Is this a scam?

Is it unprofessional to ask if a job posting on GlassDoor is real?

What's the output of a record cartridge playing an out-of-speed record

Which models of the Boeing 737 are still in production?

Mage Armor with Defense fighting style (for Adventurers League bladeslinger)

How did the USSR manage to innovate in an environment characterized by government censorship and high bureaucracy?

Today is the Center

How is it possible to have an ability score that is less than 3?

Either or Neither in sentence with another negative

Why doesn't H₄O²⁺ exist?

Why Is Death Allowed In the Matrix?

Smoothness of finite-dimensional functional calculus

Can I make popcorn with any corn?

Why don't electron-positron collisions release infinite energy?

Why "Having chlorophyll without photosynthesis is actually very dangerous" and "like living with a bomb"?

Schoenfled Residua test shows proportionality hazard assumptions holds but Kaplan-Meier plots intersect

Finding angle with pure Geometry.

Why, historically, did Gödel think CH was false?

TGV timetables / schedules?

The use of multiple foreign keys on same column in SQL Server

Does Unearthed Arcana render Favored Souls redundant?

How to find program name(s) of an installed package?



How to calculate partition Start End Sector?


Disk problems prevent me from booting, or set the disk to read-only. How do I fix the disk?How to format a 1GB USB stick to FAT32 with 512 bytes sector?Expanding root partition CentOS 6 With using fdiskHow to extend logical & extended partition with fdiskExtend partition using LVMHost unreachable after resizing partitionCorrupted ntfs volume mounting problemI have a dedicated with 2 SSDs, how to I group them to behave as 1?Wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdXExternal HDD failure due to bad blocks






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








6















I am wondering what Start and End value to choose when partitioning my ext. SSD using fdisk.



fdisk suggests 2048-250069679, default 2048 but 250069679 cannot be divided by 512 nor by 2048. Wouldn't it be better to set the Start and End value to a number that can be devided by 512 or 2048 or 4096?



For example: Start 4096 and End 250068992 




Command (m for help): p

Disk /dev/sda: 119,2 GiB, 128035676160 bytes, 250069680 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0xa4b57300


Command (m for help): n
Partition type
 p primary (0 primary, 0 extended, 4 free)
 e extended (container for logical partitions)
Select (default p): p
Partition number (1-4, default 1): 
First sector (2048-250069679, default 2048): 
Last sector, +sectors or +sizeK,M,G,T,P (2048-250069679, default 250069679): 

Created a new partition 1 of type 'Linux' and of size 119,2 GiB.


Command (m for help): p
Disk /dev/sda: 119,2 GiB, 128035676160 bytes, 250069680 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0xa4b57300

Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1 2048 250069679 250067632 119,2G 83 Linux

Command (m for help): i
Selected partition 1
 Device: /dev/sda1
 Start: 2048
 End: 250069679
 Sectors: 250067632
 Cylinders: 15566
 Size: 119,2G
 Id: 83
 Type: Linux
 Start-C/H/S: 0/32/33
 End-C/H/S: 206/29/63


mkfs.ext4 /dev/sda1
mke2fs 1.43.4 (31-Jan-2017)
Ein Dateisystems mit 31258454 (4k) Blöcken und 7815168 Inodes wird erzeugt.
UUID des Dateisystems: fdce9286-4545-447c-9cca-7d67f5bb9f43
Superblock-Sicherungskopien gespeichert in den Blöcken: 
 32768, 98304, 163840, 229376, 294912, 819200, 884736, 1605632, 2654208, 
 4096000, 7962624, 11239424, 20480000, 23887872


fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sda: 119,2 GiB, 128035676160 bytes, 250069680 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0xa4b57300

Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1 2048 250069679 250067632 119,2G 83 Linux


And how can it be that the Sectors number is lower than the End value?




Command (m for help): i
Selected partition 1
 Device: /dev/sda1
 Start: 2048
 End: 250069679
 Sectors: 250067632
 Cylinders: 15566
 Size: 119,2G
 Id: 83
 Type: Linux
 Start-C/H/S: 0/32/33
 End-C/H/S: 206/29/63






hard-disk fdisk external-hdd mkfs







share|improve this question






















  • Sectors is End minus Start. Usually for alignment, only Start matters.

    – frostschutz
    12 hours ago












  • have you considered using a higher level (therefore easier to use) tool, such as gparted?

    – ctrl-alt-delor
    10 hours ago











  • @ctrl-alt-delor normaly i use gparted, but this time i have no gui installed.

    – AlexOnLinux
    9 hours ago











  • Live OS (boot off of USB, use ssh -X and run it remotely, or parted.

    – ctrl-alt-delor
    6 hours ago

















6















I am wondering what Start and End value to choose when partitioning my ext. SSD using fdisk.



fdisk suggests 2048-250069679, default 2048 but 250069679 cannot be divided by 512 nor by 2048. Wouldn't it be better to set the Start and End value to a number that can be devided by 512 or 2048 or 4096?



For example: Start 4096 and End 250068992 




Command (m for help): p

Disk /dev/sda: 119,2 GiB, 128035676160 bytes, 250069680 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0xa4b57300


Command (m for help): n
Partition type
 p primary (0 primary, 0 extended, 4 free)
 e extended (container for logical partitions)
Select (default p): p
Partition number (1-4, default 1): 
First sector (2048-250069679, default 2048): 
Last sector, +sectors or +sizeK,M,G,T,P (2048-250069679, default 250069679): 

Created a new partition 1 of type 'Linux' and of size 119,2 GiB.


Command (m for help): p
Disk /dev/sda: 119,2 GiB, 128035676160 bytes, 250069680 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0xa4b57300

Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1 2048 250069679 250067632 119,2G 83 Linux

Command (m for help): i
Selected partition 1
 Device: /dev/sda1
 Start: 2048
 End: 250069679
 Sectors: 250067632
 Cylinders: 15566
 Size: 119,2G
 Id: 83
 Type: Linux
 Start-C/H/S: 0/32/33
 End-C/H/S: 206/29/63


mkfs.ext4 /dev/sda1
mke2fs 1.43.4 (31-Jan-2017)
Ein Dateisystems mit 31258454 (4k) Blöcken und 7815168 Inodes wird erzeugt.
UUID des Dateisystems: fdce9286-4545-447c-9cca-7d67f5bb9f43
Superblock-Sicherungskopien gespeichert in den Blöcken: 
 32768, 98304, 163840, 229376, 294912, 819200, 884736, 1605632, 2654208, 
 4096000, 7962624, 11239424, 20480000, 23887872


fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sda: 119,2 GiB, 128035676160 bytes, 250069680 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0xa4b57300

Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1 2048 250069679 250067632 119,2G 83 Linux


And how can it be that the Sectors number is lower than the End value?




Command (m for help): i
Selected partition 1
 Device: /dev/sda1
 Start: 2048
 End: 250069679
 Sectors: 250067632
 Cylinders: 15566
 Size: 119,2G
 Id: 83
 Type: Linux
 Start-C/H/S: 0/32/33
 End-C/H/S: 206/29/63






hard-disk fdisk external-hdd mkfs







share|improve this question






















  • Sectors is End minus Start. Usually for alignment, only Start matters.

    – frostschutz
    12 hours ago












  • have you considered using a higher level (therefore easier to use) tool, such as gparted?

    – ctrl-alt-delor
    10 hours ago











  • @ctrl-alt-delor normaly i use gparted, but this time i have no gui installed.

    – AlexOnLinux
    9 hours ago











  • Live OS (boot off of USB, use ssh -X and run it remotely, or parted.

    – ctrl-alt-delor
    6 hours ago













6












6








6








I am wondering what Start and End value to choose when partitioning my ext. SSD using fdisk.



fdisk suggests 2048-250069679, default 2048 but 250069679 cannot be divided by 512 nor by 2048. Wouldn't it be better to set the Start and End value to a number that can be devided by 512 or 2048 or 4096?



For example: Start 4096 and End 250068992 




Command (m for help): p

Disk /dev/sda: 119,2 GiB, 128035676160 bytes, 250069680 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0xa4b57300


Command (m for help): n
Partition type
 p primary (0 primary, 0 extended, 4 free)
 e extended (container for logical partitions)
Select (default p): p
Partition number (1-4, default 1): 
First sector (2048-250069679, default 2048): 
Last sector, +sectors or +sizeK,M,G,T,P (2048-250069679, default 250069679): 

Created a new partition 1 of type 'Linux' and of size 119,2 GiB.


Command (m for help): p
Disk /dev/sda: 119,2 GiB, 128035676160 bytes, 250069680 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0xa4b57300

Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1 2048 250069679 250067632 119,2G 83 Linux

Command (m for help): i
Selected partition 1
 Device: /dev/sda1
 Start: 2048
 End: 250069679
 Sectors: 250067632
 Cylinders: 15566
 Size: 119,2G
 Id: 83
 Type: Linux
 Start-C/H/S: 0/32/33
 End-C/H/S: 206/29/63


mkfs.ext4 /dev/sda1
mke2fs 1.43.4 (31-Jan-2017)
Ein Dateisystems mit 31258454 (4k) Blöcken und 7815168 Inodes wird erzeugt.
UUID des Dateisystems: fdce9286-4545-447c-9cca-7d67f5bb9f43
Superblock-Sicherungskopien gespeichert in den Blöcken: 
 32768, 98304, 163840, 229376, 294912, 819200, 884736, 1605632, 2654208, 
 4096000, 7962624, 11239424, 20480000, 23887872


fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sda: 119,2 GiB, 128035676160 bytes, 250069680 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0xa4b57300

Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1 2048 250069679 250067632 119,2G 83 Linux


And how can it be that the Sectors number is lower than the End value?




Command (m for help): i
Selected partition 1
 Device: /dev/sda1
 Start: 2048
 End: 250069679
 Sectors: 250067632
 Cylinders: 15566
 Size: 119,2G
 Id: 83
 Type: Linux
 Start-C/H/S: 0/32/33
 End-C/H/S: 206/29/63






hard-disk fdisk external-hdd mkfs







share|improve this question














I am wondering what Start and End value to choose when partitioning my ext. SSD using fdisk.



fdisk suggests 2048-250069679, default 2048 but 250069679 cannot be divided by 512 nor by 2048. Wouldn't it be better to set the Start and End value to a number that can be devided by 512 or 2048 or 4096?



For example: Start 4096 and End 250068992 




Command (m for help): p

Disk /dev/sda: 119,2 GiB, 128035676160 bytes, 250069680 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0xa4b57300


Command (m for help): n
Partition type
 p primary (0 primary, 0 extended, 4 free)
 e extended (container for logical partitions)
Select (default p): p
Partition number (1-4, default 1): 
First sector (2048-250069679, default 2048): 
Last sector, +sectors or +sizeK,M,G,T,P (2048-250069679, default 250069679): 

Created a new partition 1 of type 'Linux' and of size 119,2 GiB.


Command (m for help): p
Disk /dev/sda: 119,2 GiB, 128035676160 bytes, 250069680 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0xa4b57300

Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1 2048 250069679 250067632 119,2G 83 Linux

Command (m for help): i
Selected partition 1
 Device: /dev/sda1
 Start: 2048
 End: 250069679
 Sectors: 250067632
 Cylinders: 15566
 Size: 119,2G
 Id: 83
 Type: Linux
 Start-C/H/S: 0/32/33
 End-C/H/S: 206/29/63


mkfs.ext4 /dev/sda1
mke2fs 1.43.4 (31-Jan-2017)
Ein Dateisystems mit 31258454 (4k) Blöcken und 7815168 Inodes wird erzeugt.
UUID des Dateisystems: fdce9286-4545-447c-9cca-7d67f5bb9f43
Superblock-Sicherungskopien gespeichert in den Blöcken: 
 32768, 98304, 163840, 229376, 294912, 819200, 884736, 1605632, 2654208, 
 4096000, 7962624, 11239424, 20480000, 23887872


fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sda: 119,2 GiB, 128035676160 bytes, 250069680 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0xa4b57300

Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1 2048 250069679 250067632 119,2G 83 Linux


And how can it be that the Sectors number is lower than the End value?




Command (m for help): i
Selected partition 1
 Device: /dev/sda1
 Start: 2048
 End: 250069679
 Sectors: 250067632
 Cylinders: 15566
 Size: 119,2G
 Id: 83
 Type: Linux
 Start-C/H/S: 0/32/33
 End-C/H/S: 206/29/63






hard-disk fdisk external-hdd mkfs




hard-disk fdisk external-hdd mkfs






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 12 hours ago









AlexOnLinuxAlexOnLinux

1686




1686












  • Sectors is End minus Start. Usually for alignment, only Start matters.

    – frostschutz
    12 hours ago












  • have you considered using a higher level (therefore easier to use) tool, such as gparted?

    – ctrl-alt-delor
    10 hours ago











  • @ctrl-alt-delor normaly i use gparted, but this time i have no gui installed.

    – AlexOnLinux
    9 hours ago











  • Live OS (boot off of USB, use ssh -X and run it remotely, or parted.

    – ctrl-alt-delor
    6 hours ago

















  • Sectors is End minus Start. Usually for alignment, only Start matters.

    – frostschutz
    12 hours ago












  • have you considered using a higher level (therefore easier to use) tool, such as gparted?

    – ctrl-alt-delor
    10 hours ago











  • @ctrl-alt-delor normaly i use gparted, but this time i have no gui installed.

    – AlexOnLinux
    9 hours ago











  • Live OS (boot off of USB, use ssh -X and run it remotely, or parted.

    – ctrl-alt-delor
    6 hours ago
















Sectors is End minus Start. Usually for alignment, only Start matters.

– frostschutz
12 hours ago






Sectors is End minus Start. Usually for alignment, only Start matters.

– frostschutz
12 hours ago














have you considered using a higher level (therefore easier to use) tool, such as gparted?

– ctrl-alt-delor
10 hours ago





have you considered using a higher level (therefore easier to use) tool, such as gparted?

– ctrl-alt-delor
10 hours ago













@ctrl-alt-delor normaly i use gparted, but this time i have no gui installed.

– AlexOnLinux
9 hours ago





@ctrl-alt-delor normaly i use gparted, but this time i have no gui installed.

– AlexOnLinux
9 hours ago













Live OS (boot off of USB, use ssh -X and run it remotely, or parted.

– ctrl-alt-delor
6 hours ago





Live OS (boot off of USB, use ssh -X and run it remotely, or parted.

– ctrl-alt-delor
6 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5














Alignment doesn’t matter for the end sector. Sectors are numbered from 0; fdisk is suggesting the last sector on your disk (which has 250069680 sectors).



 Start: 2048
 End: 250069679
Sectors: 250067632


is correct, 250069679 minus 2048 plus one is 250067632: the partition contains 250067632 sectors, starting at offset 2048.






share|improve this answer

























  • i am wondering why the end-value is not important. do you know why perhaps?

    – AlexOnLinux
    9 hours ago











  • @AlexOnLinux your choices are either to use all the sectors available or not. If you want them all and the disk has a size which is not a multiple of 512/2048/4096 then the end will not be aligned.

    – icarus
    3 hours ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f510868%2fhow-to-calculate-partition-start-end-sector%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5














Alignment doesn’t matter for the end sector. Sectors are numbered from 0; fdisk is suggesting the last sector on your disk (which has 250069680 sectors).



 Start: 2048
 End: 250069679
Sectors: 250067632


is correct, 250069679 minus 2048 plus one is 250067632: the partition contains 250067632 sectors, starting at offset 2048.






share|improve this answer

























  • i am wondering why the end-value is not important. do you know why perhaps?

    – AlexOnLinux
    9 hours ago











  • @AlexOnLinux your choices are either to use all the sectors available or not. If you want them all and the disk has a size which is not a multiple of 512/2048/4096 then the end will not be aligned.

    – icarus
    3 hours ago















5














Alignment doesn’t matter for the end sector. Sectors are numbered from 0; fdisk is suggesting the last sector on your disk (which has 250069680 sectors).



 Start: 2048
 End: 250069679
Sectors: 250067632


is correct, 250069679 minus 2048 plus one is 250067632: the partition contains 250067632 sectors, starting at offset 2048.






share|improve this answer

























  • i am wondering why the end-value is not important. do you know why perhaps?

    – AlexOnLinux
    9 hours ago











  • @AlexOnLinux your choices are either to use all the sectors available or not. If you want them all and the disk has a size which is not a multiple of 512/2048/4096 then the end will not be aligned.

    – icarus
    3 hours ago













5












5








5







Alignment doesn’t matter for the end sector. Sectors are numbered from 0; fdisk is suggesting the last sector on your disk (which has 250069680 sectors).



 Start: 2048
 End: 250069679
Sectors: 250067632


is correct, 250069679 minus 2048 plus one is 250067632: the partition contains 250067632 sectors, starting at offset 2048.






share|improve this answer















Alignment doesn’t matter for the end sector. Sectors are numbered from 0; fdisk is suggesting the last sector on your disk (which has 250069680 sectors).



 Start: 2048
 End: 250069679
Sectors: 250067632


is correct, 250069679 minus 2048 plus one is 250067632: the partition contains 250067632 sectors, starting at offset 2048.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 11 hours ago

























answered 12 hours ago









Stephen KittStephen Kitt

180k25408487




180k25408487












  • i am wondering why the end-value is not important. do you know why perhaps?

    – AlexOnLinux
    9 hours ago











  • @AlexOnLinux your choices are either to use all the sectors available or not. If you want them all and the disk has a size which is not a multiple of 512/2048/4096 then the end will not be aligned.

    – icarus
    3 hours ago

















  • i am wondering why the end-value is not important. do you know why perhaps?

    – AlexOnLinux
    9 hours ago











  • @AlexOnLinux your choices are either to use all the sectors available or not. If you want them all and the disk has a size which is not a multiple of 512/2048/4096 then the end will not be aligned.

    – icarus
    3 hours ago
















i am wondering why the end-value is not important. do you know why perhaps?

– AlexOnLinux
9 hours ago





i am wondering why the end-value is not important. do you know why perhaps?

– AlexOnLinux
9 hours ago













@AlexOnLinux your choices are either to use all the sectors available or not. If you want them all and the disk has a size which is not a multiple of 512/2048/4096 then the end will not be aligned.

– icarus
3 hours ago





@AlexOnLinux your choices are either to use all the sectors available or not. If you want them all and the disk has a size which is not a multiple of 512/2048/4096 then the end will not be aligned.

– icarus
3 hours ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f510868%2fhow-to-calculate-partition-start-end-sector%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-