Prove that NP is closed under karp reduction?Space(n) not closed under Karp reductions - what about NTime(n)?Class P is closed under rotation?Prove or disprove that $NL$ is closed under polynomial many-one reductions$mathbfNC_2$ is closed under log-space reductionOn Karp reductionwhen can I know if a class (complexity) is closed under reduction (cook/karp)Check if class $PSPACE$ is closed under polyonomially space reductionIs NPSPACE also closed under polynomial-time reduction and under log-space reduction?Prove PSPACE is closed under complement?Prove PSPACE is closed under union?
Why are electrically insulating heatsinks so rare? Is it just cost?
Is this a crack on the carbon frame?
Today is the Center
How do I create uniquely male characters?
can i play a electric guitar through a bass amp?
Maximum likelihood parameters deviate from posterior distributions
Why doesn't H₄O²⁺ exist?
How can I make my BBEG immortal short of making them a Lich or Vampire?
Test whether all array elements are factors of a number
Adding span tags within wp_list_pages list items
Why do falling prices hurt debtors?
Problem of parity - Can we draw a closed path made up of 20 line segments...
Do VLANs within a subnet need to have their own subnet for router on a stick?
Email Account under attack (really) - anything I can do?
To string or not to string
What does "Puller Prush Person" mean?
Languages that we cannot (dis)prove to be Context-Free
Why doesn't Newton's third law mean a person bounces back to where they started when they hit the ground?
How is it possible to have an ability score that is less than 3?
Can a Warlock become Neutral Good?
Theorems that impeded progress
Why can't I see bouncing of a switch on an oscilloscope?
How do we improve the relationship with a client software team that performs poorly and is becoming less collaborative?
Can I make popcorn with any corn?
Prove that NP is closed under karp reduction?
Space(n) not closed under Karp reductions - what about NTime(n)?Class P is closed under rotation?Prove or disprove that $NL$ is closed under polynomial many-one reductions$mathbfNC_2$ is closed under log-space reductionOn Karp reductionwhen can I know if a class (complexity) is closed under reduction (cook/karp)Check if class $PSPACE$ is closed under polyonomially space reductionIs NPSPACE also closed under polynomial-time reduction and under log-space reduction?Prove PSPACE is closed under complement?Prove PSPACE is closed under union?
$begingroup$
A complexity class $mathbbC$ is said to be closed under a reduction if:
$A$ reduces to $B$ and $B in mathbbC$ $implies$ $A in mathbbC$
How would you go about proving this if $mathbbC = NP$ and the reduction to be the karp reduction? i.e.
Prove that if $A$ karp reduces to $B$ and $B in NP$ $implies$ $A in NP$
complexity-theory
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A complexity class $mathbbC$ is said to be closed under a reduction if:
$A$ reduces to $B$ and $B in mathbbC$ $implies$ $A in mathbbC$
How would you go about proving this if $mathbbC = NP$ and the reduction to be the karp reduction? i.e.
Prove that if $A$ karp reduces to $B$ and $B in NP$ $implies$ $A in NP$
complexity-theory
New contributor
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
Try using the definitions.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
$endgroup$
– Ankit Bahl
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A complexity class $mathbbC$ is said to be closed under a reduction if:
$A$ reduces to $B$ and $B in mathbbC$ $implies$ $A in mathbbC$
How would you go about proving this if $mathbbC = NP$ and the reduction to be the karp reduction? i.e.
Prove that if $A$ karp reduces to $B$ and $B in NP$ $implies$ $A in NP$
complexity-theory
New contributor
$endgroup$
A complexity class $mathbbC$ is said to be closed under a reduction if:
$A$ reduces to $B$ and $B in mathbbC$ $implies$ $A in mathbbC$
How would you go about proving this if $mathbbC = NP$ and the reduction to be the karp reduction? i.e.
Prove that if $A$ karp reduces to $B$ and $B in NP$ $implies$ $A in NP$
complexity-theory
complexity-theory
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 7 hours ago
Ankit BahlAnkit Bahl
413
413
New contributor
New contributor
3
$begingroup$
Try using the definitions.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
$endgroup$
– Ankit Bahl
6 hours ago
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
Try using the definitions.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
$endgroup$
– Ankit Bahl
6 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
Try using the definitions.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Try using the definitions.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
$endgroup$
– Ankit Bahl
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
$endgroup$
– Ankit Bahl
6 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I was able to figure it out. In case anyone was wondering:
$B in NP$ means that there exists a non-deterministic polynomial time algorithm for $B$. Let's call that $b(i)$, where i is the input to $B$.
$A$ karp reducing to $B implies$ that there exists a function $m$ such that $m$ can take an input $i$ to $A$ and map it to some input $m(i)$ for $B$, and if an instance of $i$ is true for $A$ then $m(i)$ is true for B (and vice versa),
Therefore, an algorithm for $A$ can be made as follows:
$A (i)$
- Take input $i$ and apply $m$ to yield $m(i)$
- Apply $b$ with input $m(i)$
This yields an output for $A$. Since both $m$ and $b$ are non-deterministic polynomial time, this algorithm is non-deterministic polynomial time. Therefore $A$ must be in NP.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "419"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Ankit Bahl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106574%2fprove-that-np-is-closed-under-karp-reduction%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I was able to figure it out. In case anyone was wondering:
$B in NP$ means that there exists a non-deterministic polynomial time algorithm for $B$. Let's call that $b(i)$, where i is the input to $B$.
$A$ karp reducing to $B implies$ that there exists a function $m$ such that $m$ can take an input $i$ to $A$ and map it to some input $m(i)$ for $B$, and if an instance of $i$ is true for $A$ then $m(i)$ is true for B (and vice versa),
Therefore, an algorithm for $A$ can be made as follows:
$A (i)$
- Take input $i$ and apply $m$ to yield $m(i)$
- Apply $b$ with input $m(i)$
This yields an output for $A$. Since both $m$ and $b$ are non-deterministic polynomial time, this algorithm is non-deterministic polynomial time. Therefore $A$ must be in NP.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was able to figure it out. In case anyone was wondering:
$B in NP$ means that there exists a non-deterministic polynomial time algorithm for $B$. Let's call that $b(i)$, where i is the input to $B$.
$A$ karp reducing to $B implies$ that there exists a function $m$ such that $m$ can take an input $i$ to $A$ and map it to some input $m(i)$ for $B$, and if an instance of $i$ is true for $A$ then $m(i)$ is true for B (and vice versa),
Therefore, an algorithm for $A$ can be made as follows:
$A (i)$
- Take input $i$ and apply $m$ to yield $m(i)$
- Apply $b$ with input $m(i)$
This yields an output for $A$. Since both $m$ and $b$ are non-deterministic polynomial time, this algorithm is non-deterministic polynomial time. Therefore $A$ must be in NP.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was able to figure it out. In case anyone was wondering:
$B in NP$ means that there exists a non-deterministic polynomial time algorithm for $B$. Let's call that $b(i)$, where i is the input to $B$.
$A$ karp reducing to $B implies$ that there exists a function $m$ such that $m$ can take an input $i$ to $A$ and map it to some input $m(i)$ for $B$, and if an instance of $i$ is true for $A$ then $m(i)$ is true for B (and vice versa),
Therefore, an algorithm for $A$ can be made as follows:
$A (i)$
- Take input $i$ and apply $m$ to yield $m(i)$
- Apply $b$ with input $m(i)$
This yields an output for $A$. Since both $m$ and $b$ are non-deterministic polynomial time, this algorithm is non-deterministic polynomial time. Therefore $A$ must be in NP.
New contributor
$endgroup$
I was able to figure it out. In case anyone was wondering:
$B in NP$ means that there exists a non-deterministic polynomial time algorithm for $B$. Let's call that $b(i)$, where i is the input to $B$.
$A$ karp reducing to $B implies$ that there exists a function $m$ such that $m$ can take an input $i$ to $A$ and map it to some input $m(i)$ for $B$, and if an instance of $i$ is true for $A$ then $m(i)$ is true for B (and vice versa),
Therefore, an algorithm for $A$ can be made as follows:
$A (i)$
- Take input $i$ and apply $m$ to yield $m(i)$
- Apply $b$ with input $m(i)$
This yields an output for $A$. Since both $m$ and $b$ are non-deterministic polynomial time, this algorithm is non-deterministic polynomial time. Therefore $A$ must be in NP.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 6 hours ago
Ankit BahlAnkit Bahl
413
413
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Ankit Bahl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Ankit Bahl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Ankit Bahl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Ankit Bahl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Computer Science Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106574%2fprove-that-np-is-closed-under-karp-reduction%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
Try using the definitions.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
$endgroup$
– Ankit Bahl
6 hours ago