If a space ship entered Earth orbit, how likely is it to be seen?Traffic in Space (a traffic controller for low earth orbit)How can a ship dock in space?Everyday tasks on a space shipSpace ship deceleration from speed of light

A Mainer Expression

In what sequence should an advanced civilization teach technology to medieval society to maximize rate of adoption?

If the gambler's fallacy is false, how do notions of "expected number" of events work?

What is a "major country" as named in Bernie Sanders' Healthcare debate answers?

What officially disallows US presidents from driving?

Can I tap all my opponent's lands while they're casting a spell to negate it?

What is the name of this Allen-head furniture fastener?

Parallel resistance in electric circuits

2000s space film where an alien species has almost wiped out the human race in a war

In what state are satellites left in when they are left in a graveyard orbit?

How to write characters doing illogical things in a believable way?

What was the ultimate objective of The Party in 1984?

Why don't Wizards use wrist straps to protect against disarming charms?

Should I put criteria inside my join or where clause when optimizing?

Bit one of the Intel 8080's Flags register

Ambiguity in notation resolved by +

How does a simple logistic regression model achieve a 92% classification accuracy on MNIST?

Permutations in Disguise

Why are some files not movable on Windows 10?

How are unbalanced coaxial cables used for broadcasting TV signals without any problems?

Is there a real-world mythological counterpart to WoW's "kill your gods for power" theme?

If a space ship entered Earth orbit, how likely is it to be seen?

How many ways you can go from point A to point B

Why don't airports use arresting gears to recover energy from landing passenger planes?



If a space ship entered Earth orbit, how likely is it to be seen?


Traffic in Space (a traffic controller for low earth orbit)How can a ship dock in space?Everyday tasks on a space shipSpace ship deceleration from speed of light






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








4












$begingroup$


Mostly what it says on the tin. If a spaceship, let's say about 200 meters long and 100 meters wide (made of modern materials) was approaching Earth and slowing down (say from 100 km/s to 3km/s), how far out would it be noticed? How clear of a picture could something take of it? Is is possible it wouldn't be seen until it reached the atmosphere?



The ship in question is not announcing its presence, but it also isn't trying to hide (and has no means of stealth), so it can probably be treated similarly to an asteroid.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I'll throw it out there that the answer does depend a LITTLE bit on what you're thinking of by 'Earth Orbit'. Technically your ship could approach from the far side of the moon and slot into the L2 Lagrange point on the far side and still be in 'Earth Orbit' even though it's half a million miles away with the moon in between it and us. We've got satellites there too though, so we'd almost certainly still notice it.
    $endgroup$
    – Morris The Cat
    6 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    The long version doesn't match the Title question. E.g. does it enter Earth orbit, or does it enter the atmosphere? E.g. is it seen while in orbit, or while slowing down?
    $endgroup$
    – Ray Butterworth
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    While this analysis of spacecraft detection analyses a stealth spacecraft, the hydrogen steamer, it has a lot of interesting explanations and useful equations.
    $endgroup$
    – TheDyingOfLight
    3 hours ago

















4












$begingroup$


Mostly what it says on the tin. If a spaceship, let's say about 200 meters long and 100 meters wide (made of modern materials) was approaching Earth and slowing down (say from 100 km/s to 3km/s), how far out would it be noticed? How clear of a picture could something take of it? Is is possible it wouldn't be seen until it reached the atmosphere?



The ship in question is not announcing its presence, but it also isn't trying to hide (and has no means of stealth), so it can probably be treated similarly to an asteroid.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I'll throw it out there that the answer does depend a LITTLE bit on what you're thinking of by 'Earth Orbit'. Technically your ship could approach from the far side of the moon and slot into the L2 Lagrange point on the far side and still be in 'Earth Orbit' even though it's half a million miles away with the moon in between it and us. We've got satellites there too though, so we'd almost certainly still notice it.
    $endgroup$
    – Morris The Cat
    6 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    The long version doesn't match the Title question. E.g. does it enter Earth orbit, or does it enter the atmosphere? E.g. is it seen while in orbit, or while slowing down?
    $endgroup$
    – Ray Butterworth
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    While this analysis of spacecraft detection analyses a stealth spacecraft, the hydrogen steamer, it has a lot of interesting explanations and useful equations.
    $endgroup$
    – TheDyingOfLight
    3 hours ago













4












4








4


1



$begingroup$


Mostly what it says on the tin. If a spaceship, let's say about 200 meters long and 100 meters wide (made of modern materials) was approaching Earth and slowing down (say from 100 km/s to 3km/s), how far out would it be noticed? How clear of a picture could something take of it? Is is possible it wouldn't be seen until it reached the atmosphere?



The ship in question is not announcing its presence, but it also isn't trying to hide (and has no means of stealth), so it can probably be treated similarly to an asteroid.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Mostly what it says on the tin. If a spaceship, let's say about 200 meters long and 100 meters wide (made of modern materials) was approaching Earth and slowing down (say from 100 km/s to 3km/s), how far out would it be noticed? How clear of a picture could something take of it? Is is possible it wouldn't be seen until it reached the atmosphere?



The ship in question is not announcing its presence, but it also isn't trying to hide (and has no means of stealth), so it can probably be treated similarly to an asteroid.







science-based spaceships detection






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 7 hours ago









Cyn

19.1k2 gold badges37 silver badges86 bronze badges




19.1k2 gold badges37 silver badges86 bronze badges










asked 8 hours ago









AetherfoxAetherfox

1503 bronze badges




1503 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    I'll throw it out there that the answer does depend a LITTLE bit on what you're thinking of by 'Earth Orbit'. Technically your ship could approach from the far side of the moon and slot into the L2 Lagrange point on the far side and still be in 'Earth Orbit' even though it's half a million miles away with the moon in between it and us. We've got satellites there too though, so we'd almost certainly still notice it.
    $endgroup$
    – Morris The Cat
    6 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    The long version doesn't match the Title question. E.g. does it enter Earth orbit, or does it enter the atmosphere? E.g. is it seen while in orbit, or while slowing down?
    $endgroup$
    – Ray Butterworth
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    While this analysis of spacecraft detection analyses a stealth spacecraft, the hydrogen steamer, it has a lot of interesting explanations and useful equations.
    $endgroup$
    – TheDyingOfLight
    3 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    I'll throw it out there that the answer does depend a LITTLE bit on what you're thinking of by 'Earth Orbit'. Technically your ship could approach from the far side of the moon and slot into the L2 Lagrange point on the far side and still be in 'Earth Orbit' even though it's half a million miles away with the moon in between it and us. We've got satellites there too though, so we'd almost certainly still notice it.
    $endgroup$
    – Morris The Cat
    6 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    The long version doesn't match the Title question. E.g. does it enter Earth orbit, or does it enter the atmosphere? E.g. is it seen while in orbit, or while slowing down?
    $endgroup$
    – Ray Butterworth
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    While this analysis of spacecraft detection analyses a stealth spacecraft, the hydrogen steamer, it has a lot of interesting explanations and useful equations.
    $endgroup$
    – TheDyingOfLight
    3 hours ago















$begingroup$
I'll throw it out there that the answer does depend a LITTLE bit on what you're thinking of by 'Earth Orbit'. Technically your ship could approach from the far side of the moon and slot into the L2 Lagrange point on the far side and still be in 'Earth Orbit' even though it's half a million miles away with the moon in between it and us. We've got satellites there too though, so we'd almost certainly still notice it.
$endgroup$
– Morris The Cat
6 hours ago





$begingroup$
I'll throw it out there that the answer does depend a LITTLE bit on what you're thinking of by 'Earth Orbit'. Technically your ship could approach from the far side of the moon and slot into the L2 Lagrange point on the far side and still be in 'Earth Orbit' even though it's half a million miles away with the moon in between it and us. We've got satellites there too though, so we'd almost certainly still notice it.
$endgroup$
– Morris The Cat
6 hours ago













$begingroup$
The long version doesn't match the Title question. E.g. does it enter Earth orbit, or does it enter the atmosphere? E.g. is it seen while in orbit, or while slowing down?
$endgroup$
– Ray Butterworth
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
The long version doesn't match the Title question. E.g. does it enter Earth orbit, or does it enter the atmosphere? E.g. is it seen while in orbit, or while slowing down?
$endgroup$
– Ray Butterworth
6 hours ago












$begingroup$
While this analysis of spacecraft detection analyses a stealth spacecraft, the hydrogen steamer, it has a lot of interesting explanations and useful equations.
$endgroup$
– TheDyingOfLight
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
While this analysis of spacecraft detection analyses a stealth spacecraft, the hydrogen steamer, it has a lot of interesting explanations and useful equations.
$endgroup$
– TheDyingOfLight
3 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















8














$begingroup$

Without any kind of stealth technology, it is 100% likely to be seen long before it gets anywhere close to Earth Orbit. This might give you some perspective:



A comet coming in unannounced from intersteller space, from outside of the ecliptic, was detected at 3au (three times as far from the sun as the earth is), by more than 20 different telescopes.



https://www.skyandtelescope.com/astronomy-news/possible-interstellar-comet-headed-our-way/



There are literally hundreds of organizations and thousands of amateur observers constantly looking for things like that.



An even better example might be Asteroid 2019_OK, which is just about the same size as what you're describing. It was moving about 25 times as fast as your example, and almost a worst case scenario in terms of where it was coming from in terms of being able to see it, and it was still detected about a million and a half km out, three times the distance to the moon.



Oh, and it looks like this is a duplicate too. So, my bad. =)






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Yet there are very large asteroids that we only ever learn about AFTER they've gone past the periapsis of their flyby.
    $endgroup$
    – Renan
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Renan those are moving much, much faster than the OPs example, and generally don't get nearly as close as 'earth orbit'. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_OK. It was almost a worst-case scenario in terms of difficulty of detection because of both speed and solar opposition, and it was still caught more than a million miles out.
    $endgroup$
    – Morris The Cat
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    the sky and space still seems like a pretty vast expanse to claim 100% chance to spot it
    $endgroup$
    – BKlassen
    7 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @BKlassen sky and space generally, yes. The bit specifically between the earth and the Moon's orbit is really, really intensely observed. We track lost WRENCHES in earth orbit.
    $endgroup$
    – Morris The Cat
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @BKlassen: The ship is big, and it's coming close to Earth. We are really, really interested in biggish objects coming close to Earth.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    7 hours ago


















0














$begingroup$

If the ship's orbit is perfectly circular and with a speed of 3km/s, it will be orbiting at an altitude of approximately 37,917 kilometers above sea level. That is just a very little bit above geosynchronous orbit.



This may be interesting for you: geosync altitude is kinda the sweet spot for communication satellites, so slots in it are in high demand. If you check the interactive graphic in this page, you will lots and lots of satellites there.



Then we have this article from Sky and Telescope:




Many geosynchronous satellites shine between magnitudes 10–12, so you can spot them in telescopes as small as 4 inches.




On top of that, being close to geosync altitude means that for an observer in the ground, the ship will be moving very slowly - so it will be easy to track once found.



How visible it will be, though, depends on its albedo. If it is completely dark, it will only be noticed if it passes in front of something - another planet, or the Moon. If however it is as shiny as a solar panel, lots of people stargazing will see it as a shiny dot. It might be visible by day, with the right angles and equipment.



If it has the albedo of the regular asteroid, it may probably be found before it settles into orbit. In 2018, 41.9% of the asteroids approaching Earth with a closest distance smaller than Lunar Distance were detected before closest approach.



We'll probably never know what hits us



The huge majority of those were in the 1 to 20 meters size range, so a much large ship might be easier to spot oncoming.



2019 is not over yet, but we seem to be doing slightly better at detecting things before they arrive. I'd give your ship's odds of coming in unexpected at around 50%. If it arrives without being detected, then once it settles in orbit it might be a matter of hours to days until it is seen.



P.s.: at a distance from the sun close to the Earth, the solar system's escape speed is around 42 km/s. The flight path of a 100km/s ship prior to decelleration would be a very broad, open curve entering the system at one side and exiting it again at the other side.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Your graph tends to obscure the fact that the fast majority of those 'After closest approach' objects are quite small. The only things on that graph that got within 100,000km without being detected were less than 10m across. You're also not taking into account the fact that anything trying to insert into earth orbit would come into the range of the hundreds of radar stations that track earth's orbital space. Those systems are able resolve objects of 1m in Geosynchronous orbit, so I don't see how anything 200m across is going to arrive without being detected.
    $endgroup$
    – Morris The Cat
    7 hours ago


















0














$begingroup$

More important than the size of the object is its heat signature. Slowing down from 200 km/s to 3 km/s, without having the ship be 99.9% propellant, requires a LOT of energy, and that energy will show up as a bright heat signature even if the deceleration burn starts months in advance. It's my understanding that heat signatures in space are very, very easy to detect, to the point that a detector small enough to be put on a modern-day satellite could detect the exhaust plume of a space shuttle... from the orbit of Pluto, and that such a detector could scan the entire sky about once an hour. Granted, that last part is hearsay and I have no numbers to back it up; but if we have a heat detection system even 1% that effective, we'll spot this ship coming in from it's exhaust plume long, long before it gets into range of any radar or optical telescopes.



Assuming, of course, that it's not using a reactionless drive, but that's a whole other can of worms.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$

















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "579"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );














    draft saved

    draft discarded
















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f156069%2fif-a-space-ship-entered-earth-orbit-how-likely-is-it-to-be-seen%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    8














    $begingroup$

    Without any kind of stealth technology, it is 100% likely to be seen long before it gets anywhere close to Earth Orbit. This might give you some perspective:



    A comet coming in unannounced from intersteller space, from outside of the ecliptic, was detected at 3au (three times as far from the sun as the earth is), by more than 20 different telescopes.



    https://www.skyandtelescope.com/astronomy-news/possible-interstellar-comet-headed-our-way/



    There are literally hundreds of organizations and thousands of amateur observers constantly looking for things like that.



    An even better example might be Asteroid 2019_OK, which is just about the same size as what you're describing. It was moving about 25 times as fast as your example, and almost a worst case scenario in terms of where it was coming from in terms of being able to see it, and it was still detected about a million and a half km out, three times the distance to the moon.



    Oh, and it looks like this is a duplicate too. So, my bad. =)






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$














    • $begingroup$
      Yet there are very large asteroids that we only ever learn about AFTER they've gone past the periapsis of their flyby.
      $endgroup$
      – Renan
      8 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Renan those are moving much, much faster than the OPs example, and generally don't get nearly as close as 'earth orbit'. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_OK. It was almost a worst-case scenario in terms of difficulty of detection because of both speed and solar opposition, and it was still caught more than a million miles out.
      $endgroup$
      – Morris The Cat
      7 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      the sky and space still seems like a pretty vast expanse to claim 100% chance to spot it
      $endgroup$
      – BKlassen
      7 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @BKlassen sky and space generally, yes. The bit specifically between the earth and the Moon's orbit is really, really intensely observed. We track lost WRENCHES in earth orbit.
      $endgroup$
      – Morris The Cat
      7 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @BKlassen: The ship is big, and it's coming close to Earth. We are really, really interested in biggish objects coming close to Earth.
      $endgroup$
      – AlexP
      7 hours ago















    8














    $begingroup$

    Without any kind of stealth technology, it is 100% likely to be seen long before it gets anywhere close to Earth Orbit. This might give you some perspective:



    A comet coming in unannounced from intersteller space, from outside of the ecliptic, was detected at 3au (three times as far from the sun as the earth is), by more than 20 different telescopes.



    https://www.skyandtelescope.com/astronomy-news/possible-interstellar-comet-headed-our-way/



    There are literally hundreds of organizations and thousands of amateur observers constantly looking for things like that.



    An even better example might be Asteroid 2019_OK, which is just about the same size as what you're describing. It was moving about 25 times as fast as your example, and almost a worst case scenario in terms of where it was coming from in terms of being able to see it, and it was still detected about a million and a half km out, three times the distance to the moon.



    Oh, and it looks like this is a duplicate too. So, my bad. =)






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$














    • $begingroup$
      Yet there are very large asteroids that we only ever learn about AFTER they've gone past the periapsis of their flyby.
      $endgroup$
      – Renan
      8 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Renan those are moving much, much faster than the OPs example, and generally don't get nearly as close as 'earth orbit'. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_OK. It was almost a worst-case scenario in terms of difficulty of detection because of both speed and solar opposition, and it was still caught more than a million miles out.
      $endgroup$
      – Morris The Cat
      7 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      the sky and space still seems like a pretty vast expanse to claim 100% chance to spot it
      $endgroup$
      – BKlassen
      7 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @BKlassen sky and space generally, yes. The bit specifically between the earth and the Moon's orbit is really, really intensely observed. We track lost WRENCHES in earth orbit.
      $endgroup$
      – Morris The Cat
      7 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @BKlassen: The ship is big, and it's coming close to Earth. We are really, really interested in biggish objects coming close to Earth.
      $endgroup$
      – AlexP
      7 hours ago













    8














    8










    8







    $begingroup$

    Without any kind of stealth technology, it is 100% likely to be seen long before it gets anywhere close to Earth Orbit. This might give you some perspective:



    A comet coming in unannounced from intersteller space, from outside of the ecliptic, was detected at 3au (three times as far from the sun as the earth is), by more than 20 different telescopes.



    https://www.skyandtelescope.com/astronomy-news/possible-interstellar-comet-headed-our-way/



    There are literally hundreds of organizations and thousands of amateur observers constantly looking for things like that.



    An even better example might be Asteroid 2019_OK, which is just about the same size as what you're describing. It was moving about 25 times as fast as your example, and almost a worst case scenario in terms of where it was coming from in terms of being able to see it, and it was still detected about a million and a half km out, three times the distance to the moon.



    Oh, and it looks like this is a duplicate too. So, my bad. =)






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Without any kind of stealth technology, it is 100% likely to be seen long before it gets anywhere close to Earth Orbit. This might give you some perspective:



    A comet coming in unannounced from intersteller space, from outside of the ecliptic, was detected at 3au (three times as far from the sun as the earth is), by more than 20 different telescopes.



    https://www.skyandtelescope.com/astronomy-news/possible-interstellar-comet-headed-our-way/



    There are literally hundreds of organizations and thousands of amateur observers constantly looking for things like that.



    An even better example might be Asteroid 2019_OK, which is just about the same size as what you're describing. It was moving about 25 times as fast as your example, and almost a worst case scenario in terms of where it was coming from in terms of being able to see it, and it was still detected about a million and a half km out, three times the distance to the moon.



    Oh, and it looks like this is a duplicate too. So, my bad. =)







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 7 hours ago

























    answered 8 hours ago









    Morris The CatMorris The Cat

    8,6161 gold badge24 silver badges45 bronze badges




    8,6161 gold badge24 silver badges45 bronze badges














    • $begingroup$
      Yet there are very large asteroids that we only ever learn about AFTER they've gone past the periapsis of their flyby.
      $endgroup$
      – Renan
      8 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Renan those are moving much, much faster than the OPs example, and generally don't get nearly as close as 'earth orbit'. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_OK. It was almost a worst-case scenario in terms of difficulty of detection because of both speed and solar opposition, and it was still caught more than a million miles out.
      $endgroup$
      – Morris The Cat
      7 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      the sky and space still seems like a pretty vast expanse to claim 100% chance to spot it
      $endgroup$
      – BKlassen
      7 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @BKlassen sky and space generally, yes. The bit specifically between the earth and the Moon's orbit is really, really intensely observed. We track lost WRENCHES in earth orbit.
      $endgroup$
      – Morris The Cat
      7 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @BKlassen: The ship is big, and it's coming close to Earth. We are really, really interested in biggish objects coming close to Earth.
      $endgroup$
      – AlexP
      7 hours ago
















    • $begingroup$
      Yet there are very large asteroids that we only ever learn about AFTER they've gone past the periapsis of their flyby.
      $endgroup$
      – Renan
      8 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Renan those are moving much, much faster than the OPs example, and generally don't get nearly as close as 'earth orbit'. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_OK. It was almost a worst-case scenario in terms of difficulty of detection because of both speed and solar opposition, and it was still caught more than a million miles out.
      $endgroup$
      – Morris The Cat
      7 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      the sky and space still seems like a pretty vast expanse to claim 100% chance to spot it
      $endgroup$
      – BKlassen
      7 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @BKlassen sky and space generally, yes. The bit specifically between the earth and the Moon's orbit is really, really intensely observed. We track lost WRENCHES in earth orbit.
      $endgroup$
      – Morris The Cat
      7 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @BKlassen: The ship is big, and it's coming close to Earth. We are really, really interested in biggish objects coming close to Earth.
      $endgroup$
      – AlexP
      7 hours ago















    $begingroup$
    Yet there are very large asteroids that we only ever learn about AFTER they've gone past the periapsis of their flyby.
    $endgroup$
    – Renan
    8 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Yet there are very large asteroids that we only ever learn about AFTER they've gone past the periapsis of their flyby.
    $endgroup$
    – Renan
    8 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    @Renan those are moving much, much faster than the OPs example, and generally don't get nearly as close as 'earth orbit'. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_OK. It was almost a worst-case scenario in terms of difficulty of detection because of both speed and solar opposition, and it was still caught more than a million miles out.
    $endgroup$
    – Morris The Cat
    7 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @Renan those are moving much, much faster than the OPs example, and generally don't get nearly as close as 'earth orbit'. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_OK. It was almost a worst-case scenario in terms of difficulty of detection because of both speed and solar opposition, and it was still caught more than a million miles out.
    $endgroup$
    – Morris The Cat
    7 hours ago




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    the sky and space still seems like a pretty vast expanse to claim 100% chance to spot it
    $endgroup$
    – BKlassen
    7 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    the sky and space still seems like a pretty vast expanse to claim 100% chance to spot it
    $endgroup$
    – BKlassen
    7 hours ago




    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    @BKlassen sky and space generally, yes. The bit specifically between the earth and the Moon's orbit is really, really intensely observed. We track lost WRENCHES in earth orbit.
    $endgroup$
    – Morris The Cat
    7 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @BKlassen sky and space generally, yes. The bit specifically between the earth and the Moon's orbit is really, really intensely observed. We track lost WRENCHES in earth orbit.
    $endgroup$
    – Morris The Cat
    7 hours ago




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @BKlassen: The ship is big, and it's coming close to Earth. We are really, really interested in biggish objects coming close to Earth.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    7 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @BKlassen: The ship is big, and it's coming close to Earth. We are really, really interested in biggish objects coming close to Earth.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    7 hours ago













    0














    $begingroup$

    If the ship's orbit is perfectly circular and with a speed of 3km/s, it will be orbiting at an altitude of approximately 37,917 kilometers above sea level. That is just a very little bit above geosynchronous orbit.



    This may be interesting for you: geosync altitude is kinda the sweet spot for communication satellites, so slots in it are in high demand. If you check the interactive graphic in this page, you will lots and lots of satellites there.



    Then we have this article from Sky and Telescope:




    Many geosynchronous satellites shine between magnitudes 10–12, so you can spot them in telescopes as small as 4 inches.




    On top of that, being close to geosync altitude means that for an observer in the ground, the ship will be moving very slowly - so it will be easy to track once found.



    How visible it will be, though, depends on its albedo. If it is completely dark, it will only be noticed if it passes in front of something - another planet, or the Moon. If however it is as shiny as a solar panel, lots of people stargazing will see it as a shiny dot. It might be visible by day, with the right angles and equipment.



    If it has the albedo of the regular asteroid, it may probably be found before it settles into orbit. In 2018, 41.9% of the asteroids approaching Earth with a closest distance smaller than Lunar Distance were detected before closest approach.



    We'll probably never know what hits us



    The huge majority of those were in the 1 to 20 meters size range, so a much large ship might be easier to spot oncoming.



    2019 is not over yet, but we seem to be doing slightly better at detecting things before they arrive. I'd give your ship's odds of coming in unexpected at around 50%. If it arrives without being detected, then once it settles in orbit it might be a matter of hours to days until it is seen.



    P.s.: at a distance from the sun close to the Earth, the solar system's escape speed is around 42 km/s. The flight path of a 100km/s ship prior to decelleration would be a very broad, open curve entering the system at one side and exiting it again at the other side.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$










    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Your graph tends to obscure the fact that the fast majority of those 'After closest approach' objects are quite small. The only things on that graph that got within 100,000km without being detected were less than 10m across. You're also not taking into account the fact that anything trying to insert into earth orbit would come into the range of the hundreds of radar stations that track earth's orbital space. Those systems are able resolve objects of 1m in Geosynchronous orbit, so I don't see how anything 200m across is going to arrive without being detected.
      $endgroup$
      – Morris The Cat
      7 hours ago















    0














    $begingroup$

    If the ship's orbit is perfectly circular and with a speed of 3km/s, it will be orbiting at an altitude of approximately 37,917 kilometers above sea level. That is just a very little bit above geosynchronous orbit.



    This may be interesting for you: geosync altitude is kinda the sweet spot for communication satellites, so slots in it are in high demand. If you check the interactive graphic in this page, you will lots and lots of satellites there.



    Then we have this article from Sky and Telescope:




    Many geosynchronous satellites shine between magnitudes 10–12, so you can spot them in telescopes as small as 4 inches.




    On top of that, being close to geosync altitude means that for an observer in the ground, the ship will be moving very slowly - so it will be easy to track once found.



    How visible it will be, though, depends on its albedo. If it is completely dark, it will only be noticed if it passes in front of something - another planet, or the Moon. If however it is as shiny as a solar panel, lots of people stargazing will see it as a shiny dot. It might be visible by day, with the right angles and equipment.



    If it has the albedo of the regular asteroid, it may probably be found before it settles into orbit. In 2018, 41.9% of the asteroids approaching Earth with a closest distance smaller than Lunar Distance were detected before closest approach.



    We'll probably never know what hits us



    The huge majority of those were in the 1 to 20 meters size range, so a much large ship might be easier to spot oncoming.



    2019 is not over yet, but we seem to be doing slightly better at detecting things before they arrive. I'd give your ship's odds of coming in unexpected at around 50%. If it arrives without being detected, then once it settles in orbit it might be a matter of hours to days until it is seen.



    P.s.: at a distance from the sun close to the Earth, the solar system's escape speed is around 42 km/s. The flight path of a 100km/s ship prior to decelleration would be a very broad, open curve entering the system at one side and exiting it again at the other side.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$










    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Your graph tends to obscure the fact that the fast majority of those 'After closest approach' objects are quite small. The only things on that graph that got within 100,000km without being detected were less than 10m across. You're also not taking into account the fact that anything trying to insert into earth orbit would come into the range of the hundreds of radar stations that track earth's orbital space. Those systems are able resolve objects of 1m in Geosynchronous orbit, so I don't see how anything 200m across is going to arrive without being detected.
      $endgroup$
      – Morris The Cat
      7 hours ago













    0














    0










    0







    $begingroup$

    If the ship's orbit is perfectly circular and with a speed of 3km/s, it will be orbiting at an altitude of approximately 37,917 kilometers above sea level. That is just a very little bit above geosynchronous orbit.



    This may be interesting for you: geosync altitude is kinda the sweet spot for communication satellites, so slots in it are in high demand. If you check the interactive graphic in this page, you will lots and lots of satellites there.



    Then we have this article from Sky and Telescope:




    Many geosynchronous satellites shine between magnitudes 10–12, so you can spot them in telescopes as small as 4 inches.




    On top of that, being close to geosync altitude means that for an observer in the ground, the ship will be moving very slowly - so it will be easy to track once found.



    How visible it will be, though, depends on its albedo. If it is completely dark, it will only be noticed if it passes in front of something - another planet, or the Moon. If however it is as shiny as a solar panel, lots of people stargazing will see it as a shiny dot. It might be visible by day, with the right angles and equipment.



    If it has the albedo of the regular asteroid, it may probably be found before it settles into orbit. In 2018, 41.9% of the asteroids approaching Earth with a closest distance smaller than Lunar Distance were detected before closest approach.



    We'll probably never know what hits us



    The huge majority of those were in the 1 to 20 meters size range, so a much large ship might be easier to spot oncoming.



    2019 is not over yet, but we seem to be doing slightly better at detecting things before they arrive. I'd give your ship's odds of coming in unexpected at around 50%. If it arrives without being detected, then once it settles in orbit it might be a matter of hours to days until it is seen.



    P.s.: at a distance from the sun close to the Earth, the solar system's escape speed is around 42 km/s. The flight path of a 100km/s ship prior to decelleration would be a very broad, open curve entering the system at one side and exiting it again at the other side.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    If the ship's orbit is perfectly circular and with a speed of 3km/s, it will be orbiting at an altitude of approximately 37,917 kilometers above sea level. That is just a very little bit above geosynchronous orbit.



    This may be interesting for you: geosync altitude is kinda the sweet spot for communication satellites, so slots in it are in high demand. If you check the interactive graphic in this page, you will lots and lots of satellites there.



    Then we have this article from Sky and Telescope:




    Many geosynchronous satellites shine between magnitudes 10–12, so you can spot them in telescopes as small as 4 inches.




    On top of that, being close to geosync altitude means that for an observer in the ground, the ship will be moving very slowly - so it will be easy to track once found.



    How visible it will be, though, depends on its albedo. If it is completely dark, it will only be noticed if it passes in front of something - another planet, or the Moon. If however it is as shiny as a solar panel, lots of people stargazing will see it as a shiny dot. It might be visible by day, with the right angles and equipment.



    If it has the albedo of the regular asteroid, it may probably be found before it settles into orbit. In 2018, 41.9% of the asteroids approaching Earth with a closest distance smaller than Lunar Distance were detected before closest approach.



    We'll probably never know what hits us



    The huge majority of those were in the 1 to 20 meters size range, so a much large ship might be easier to spot oncoming.



    2019 is not over yet, but we seem to be doing slightly better at detecting things before they arrive. I'd give your ship's odds of coming in unexpected at around 50%. If it arrives without being detected, then once it settles in orbit it might be a matter of hours to days until it is seen.



    P.s.: at a distance from the sun close to the Earth, the solar system's escape speed is around 42 km/s. The flight path of a 100km/s ship prior to decelleration would be a very broad, open curve entering the system at one side and exiting it again at the other side.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 7 hours ago

























    answered 7 hours ago









    RenanRenan

    68.2k21 gold badges155 silver badges330 bronze badges




    68.2k21 gold badges155 silver badges330 bronze badges










    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Your graph tends to obscure the fact that the fast majority of those 'After closest approach' objects are quite small. The only things on that graph that got within 100,000km without being detected were less than 10m across. You're also not taking into account the fact that anything trying to insert into earth orbit would come into the range of the hundreds of radar stations that track earth's orbital space. Those systems are able resolve objects of 1m in Geosynchronous orbit, so I don't see how anything 200m across is going to arrive without being detected.
      $endgroup$
      – Morris The Cat
      7 hours ago












    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Your graph tends to obscure the fact that the fast majority of those 'After closest approach' objects are quite small. The only things on that graph that got within 100,000km without being detected were less than 10m across. You're also not taking into account the fact that anything trying to insert into earth orbit would come into the range of the hundreds of radar stations that track earth's orbital space. Those systems are able resolve objects of 1m in Geosynchronous orbit, so I don't see how anything 200m across is going to arrive without being detected.
      $endgroup$
      – Morris The Cat
      7 hours ago







    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    Your graph tends to obscure the fact that the fast majority of those 'After closest approach' objects are quite small. The only things on that graph that got within 100,000km without being detected were less than 10m across. You're also not taking into account the fact that anything trying to insert into earth orbit would come into the range of the hundreds of radar stations that track earth's orbital space. Those systems are able resolve objects of 1m in Geosynchronous orbit, so I don't see how anything 200m across is going to arrive without being detected.
    $endgroup$
    – Morris The Cat
    7 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Your graph tends to obscure the fact that the fast majority of those 'After closest approach' objects are quite small. The only things on that graph that got within 100,000km without being detected were less than 10m across. You're also not taking into account the fact that anything trying to insert into earth orbit would come into the range of the hundreds of radar stations that track earth's orbital space. Those systems are able resolve objects of 1m in Geosynchronous orbit, so I don't see how anything 200m across is going to arrive without being detected.
    $endgroup$
    – Morris The Cat
    7 hours ago











    0














    $begingroup$

    More important than the size of the object is its heat signature. Slowing down from 200 km/s to 3 km/s, without having the ship be 99.9% propellant, requires a LOT of energy, and that energy will show up as a bright heat signature even if the deceleration burn starts months in advance. It's my understanding that heat signatures in space are very, very easy to detect, to the point that a detector small enough to be put on a modern-day satellite could detect the exhaust plume of a space shuttle... from the orbit of Pluto, and that such a detector could scan the entire sky about once an hour. Granted, that last part is hearsay and I have no numbers to back it up; but if we have a heat detection system even 1% that effective, we'll spot this ship coming in from it's exhaust plume long, long before it gets into range of any radar or optical telescopes.



    Assuming, of course, that it's not using a reactionless drive, but that's a whole other can of worms.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



















      0














      $begingroup$

      More important than the size of the object is its heat signature. Slowing down from 200 km/s to 3 km/s, without having the ship be 99.9% propellant, requires a LOT of energy, and that energy will show up as a bright heat signature even if the deceleration burn starts months in advance. It's my understanding that heat signatures in space are very, very easy to detect, to the point that a detector small enough to be put on a modern-day satellite could detect the exhaust plume of a space shuttle... from the orbit of Pluto, and that such a detector could scan the entire sky about once an hour. Granted, that last part is hearsay and I have no numbers to back it up; but if we have a heat detection system even 1% that effective, we'll spot this ship coming in from it's exhaust plume long, long before it gets into range of any radar or optical telescopes.



      Assuming, of course, that it's not using a reactionless drive, but that's a whole other can of worms.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        0














        0










        0







        $begingroup$

        More important than the size of the object is its heat signature. Slowing down from 200 km/s to 3 km/s, without having the ship be 99.9% propellant, requires a LOT of energy, and that energy will show up as a bright heat signature even if the deceleration burn starts months in advance. It's my understanding that heat signatures in space are very, very easy to detect, to the point that a detector small enough to be put on a modern-day satellite could detect the exhaust plume of a space shuttle... from the orbit of Pluto, and that such a detector could scan the entire sky about once an hour. Granted, that last part is hearsay and I have no numbers to back it up; but if we have a heat detection system even 1% that effective, we'll spot this ship coming in from it's exhaust plume long, long before it gets into range of any radar or optical telescopes.



        Assuming, of course, that it's not using a reactionless drive, but that's a whole other can of worms.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        More important than the size of the object is its heat signature. Slowing down from 200 km/s to 3 km/s, without having the ship be 99.9% propellant, requires a LOT of energy, and that energy will show up as a bright heat signature even if the deceleration burn starts months in advance. It's my understanding that heat signatures in space are very, very easy to detect, to the point that a detector small enough to be put on a modern-day satellite could detect the exhaust plume of a space shuttle... from the orbit of Pluto, and that such a detector could scan the entire sky about once an hour. Granted, that last part is hearsay and I have no numbers to back it up; but if we have a heat detection system even 1% that effective, we'll spot this ship coming in from it's exhaust plume long, long before it gets into range of any radar or optical telescopes.



        Assuming, of course, that it's not using a reactionless drive, but that's a whole other can of worms.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 6 hours ago









        FlyingLemmingSoupFlyingLemmingSoup

        5141 gold badge2 silver badges11 bronze badges




        5141 gold badge2 silver badges11 bronze badges































            draft saved

            draft discarded















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f156069%2fif-a-space-ship-entered-earth-orbit-how-likely-is-it-to-be-seen%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            François Viète Contents Biography Work and thought Bibliography See also Notes Further reading External links Navigation menup. 21Google Bookspp. 75–77Google BooksDe thou (from University of Saint Andrews)ArchivedGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle booksGoogle Bookscc-parthenay.frL'histoire universelle (fr)Universal History (en)ArchivedAdsabs.harvard.eduPagesperso-orange.frArchive.orgChikara Sasaki. Descartes' mathematical thought p.259Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle Bookspp. 152 and onwardGoogle BooksGoogle BooksScribd.comGoogle Books1257-7979Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGallica.bnf.frGoogle BooksGoogle Books"François Viète"Francois Viète: Father of Modern Algebraic NotationThe Lawyer and the GamblerAbout TarporleySite de Jean-Paul GuichardL'algèbre nouvelle"About the Harmonicon"cb120511976(data)1188044800000 0001 0913 5903n82164680ola2013766880073431702w6vt1sb70287374827140948071409480