12TET vs Pythagorean scales; “perfect” fourths?Why is the guitar tuned like it is?Is i-V a stronger progression than I-V?Why are there major and minor intervals?Tuning of Accidentals & ScalesConfusion about intervals in chromatic VS diatonic scalesIf an ensemble plays using just intonation, is it true the ensemble will always go sharp?Which are all the musical intervals that are valid?
Is it possible to encode a message in such a way that can only be read by someone or something capable of seeing into the very near future?
while loop factorial only works up to 20?
What exactly did this mechanic sabotage on the American Airlines 737, and how dangerous was it?
Should the average user with no special access rights be worried about SMS-based 2FA being theoretically interceptable?
Safe to use 220V electric clothes dryer when building has been bridged down to 110V?
Why weren't the Death Star plans transmitted electronically?
A delve into extraordinary chess problems: Selfmate 1
What is the need of methods like GET and POST in the HTTP protocol?
How to deal with my team leader who keeps calling me about project updates even though I am on leave for personal reasons?
Designing a time thief proof safe
12TET vs Pythagorean scales; "perfect" fourths?
How do pilots align the HUD with their eyeballs?
To change trains = cambiare treno?
Safely hang a mirror that does not have hooks
Comma Code - Automate the Boring Stuff with Python
Is there any iPhone SE out there with 3D Touch?
Vehicle routing benchmark instances
Hiking with a mule or two?
Hilbert's hotel: why can't I repeat it infinitely many times?
Can a DC brushless motor produce the same torque at different power levels?
1, 2, 4, 8, 16, ... 33?
Line segments inside a square
Basic digital RC approximation filter in python (Micropython)
Can you cast Dispel Magic on a Shadow Monk's Silence?
12TET vs Pythagorean scales; “perfect” fourths?
Why is the guitar tuned like it is?Is i-V a stronger progression than I-V?Why are there major and minor intervals?Tuning of Accidentals & ScalesConfusion about intervals in chromatic VS diatonic scalesIf an ensemble plays using just intonation, is it true the ensemble will always go sharp?Which are all the musical intervals that are valid?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
Virtually all the sources I can find claim that the intervals between adjacent guitar strings in standard tuning (EADGBE) should be perfect fourths, except for one major third. However, since a perfect fourth is 4/3 and a major third is 5/4, this means the interval between the two E strings would be (4/3)**4 * (5/4) = 3.950... which is about 2% flat from the perfect interval, 4 (two perfect octaves).
Wikipedia has a table of "String frequencies of standard tuning" in Hz. If you do the math, you'll find that none of the intervals are actually exact. All the "perfect" fourths are sharp and the major third is also sharp. The really funny thing is they are all sharp by differing percentages. ~~It doesn't seem to be perfectly 12-TET either (semitone = 1.05946..).~~ Actually, maybe it is 12-TET within the given precision.
Is the "perfect" interval tuning just a simplification? Also, I realize this applies to all fretted instruments, not just the guitar.
tuning intervals
|
show 4 more comments
Virtually all the sources I can find claim that the intervals between adjacent guitar strings in standard tuning (EADGBE) should be perfect fourths, except for one major third. However, since a perfect fourth is 4/3 and a major third is 5/4, this means the interval between the two E strings would be (4/3)**4 * (5/4) = 3.950... which is about 2% flat from the perfect interval, 4 (two perfect octaves).
Wikipedia has a table of "String frequencies of standard tuning" in Hz. If you do the math, you'll find that none of the intervals are actually exact. All the "perfect" fourths are sharp and the major third is also sharp. The really funny thing is they are all sharp by differing percentages. ~~It doesn't seem to be perfectly 12-TET either (semitone = 1.05946..).~~ Actually, maybe it is 12-TET within the given precision.
Is the "perfect" interval tuning just a simplification? Also, I realize this applies to all fretted instruments, not just the guitar.
tuning intervals
5
'Perfect thirds' don't exist. On guitar, between G and B is M3. Maybe our ears compensate a little for the 'out of tune'. Also bear in mind that each string is a slightly different length to comensate for intonation caused by the fretwires being perpendicular to all the strings.
– Tim
yesterday
Are these sources referring to a 4 string guitar?
– ggcg
yesterday
1
You are correct, we do not tune the guitar like that. We usually start with relative tuning but adjust by comparing harmonics and open string octaves. In other words the high e is tuned rel to the low E harmonic and intermediate strings adjusted until (at least for acoustics) resonances with open strings are observed.
– ggcg
yesterday
2
@Tim Sure a perfect third exists - just climb up the harmonic ladder a bit. It just doesn't "exist" in tempered scales.
– Carl Witthoft
yesterday
1
you're confusing the term "perfect" with the term "just". In a sense, a "perfectly in tune interval" would be the just interval, but that's not what the word "perfect" means in a musical context.
– Some_Guy
9 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
Virtually all the sources I can find claim that the intervals between adjacent guitar strings in standard tuning (EADGBE) should be perfect fourths, except for one major third. However, since a perfect fourth is 4/3 and a major third is 5/4, this means the interval between the two E strings would be (4/3)**4 * (5/4) = 3.950... which is about 2% flat from the perfect interval, 4 (two perfect octaves).
Wikipedia has a table of "String frequencies of standard tuning" in Hz. If you do the math, you'll find that none of the intervals are actually exact. All the "perfect" fourths are sharp and the major third is also sharp. The really funny thing is they are all sharp by differing percentages. ~~It doesn't seem to be perfectly 12-TET either (semitone = 1.05946..).~~ Actually, maybe it is 12-TET within the given precision.
Is the "perfect" interval tuning just a simplification? Also, I realize this applies to all fretted instruments, not just the guitar.
tuning intervals
Virtually all the sources I can find claim that the intervals between adjacent guitar strings in standard tuning (EADGBE) should be perfect fourths, except for one major third. However, since a perfect fourth is 4/3 and a major third is 5/4, this means the interval between the two E strings would be (4/3)**4 * (5/4) = 3.950... which is about 2% flat from the perfect interval, 4 (two perfect octaves).
Wikipedia has a table of "String frequencies of standard tuning" in Hz. If you do the math, you'll find that none of the intervals are actually exact. All the "perfect" fourths are sharp and the major third is also sharp. The really funny thing is they are all sharp by differing percentages. ~~It doesn't seem to be perfectly 12-TET either (semitone = 1.05946..).~~ Actually, maybe it is 12-TET within the given precision.
Is the "perfect" interval tuning just a simplification? Also, I realize this applies to all fretted instruments, not just the guitar.
tuning intervals
tuning intervals
edited 54 mins ago
neilfein
3,5181 gold badge26 silver badges56 bronze badges
3,5181 gold badge26 silver badges56 bronze badges
asked yesterday
Emanuel LandeholmEmanuel Landeholm
2703 silver badges10 bronze badges
2703 silver badges10 bronze badges
5
'Perfect thirds' don't exist. On guitar, between G and B is M3. Maybe our ears compensate a little for the 'out of tune'. Also bear in mind that each string is a slightly different length to comensate for intonation caused by the fretwires being perpendicular to all the strings.
– Tim
yesterday
Are these sources referring to a 4 string guitar?
– ggcg
yesterday
1
You are correct, we do not tune the guitar like that. We usually start with relative tuning but adjust by comparing harmonics and open string octaves. In other words the high e is tuned rel to the low E harmonic and intermediate strings adjusted until (at least for acoustics) resonances with open strings are observed.
– ggcg
yesterday
2
@Tim Sure a perfect third exists - just climb up the harmonic ladder a bit. It just doesn't "exist" in tempered scales.
– Carl Witthoft
yesterday
1
you're confusing the term "perfect" with the term "just". In a sense, a "perfectly in tune interval" would be the just interval, but that's not what the word "perfect" means in a musical context.
– Some_Guy
9 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
5
'Perfect thirds' don't exist. On guitar, between G and B is M3. Maybe our ears compensate a little for the 'out of tune'. Also bear in mind that each string is a slightly different length to comensate for intonation caused by the fretwires being perpendicular to all the strings.
– Tim
yesterday
Are these sources referring to a 4 string guitar?
– ggcg
yesterday
1
You are correct, we do not tune the guitar like that. We usually start with relative tuning but adjust by comparing harmonics and open string octaves. In other words the high e is tuned rel to the low E harmonic and intermediate strings adjusted until (at least for acoustics) resonances with open strings are observed.
– ggcg
yesterday
2
@Tim Sure a perfect third exists - just climb up the harmonic ladder a bit. It just doesn't "exist" in tempered scales.
– Carl Witthoft
yesterday
1
you're confusing the term "perfect" with the term "just". In a sense, a "perfectly in tune interval" would be the just interval, but that's not what the word "perfect" means in a musical context.
– Some_Guy
9 hours ago
5
5
'Perfect thirds' don't exist. On guitar, between G and B is M3. Maybe our ears compensate a little for the 'out of tune'. Also bear in mind that each string is a slightly different length to comensate for intonation caused by the fretwires being perpendicular to all the strings.
– Tim
yesterday
'Perfect thirds' don't exist. On guitar, between G and B is M3. Maybe our ears compensate a little for the 'out of tune'. Also bear in mind that each string is a slightly different length to comensate for intonation caused by the fretwires being perpendicular to all the strings.
– Tim
yesterday
Are these sources referring to a 4 string guitar?
– ggcg
yesterday
Are these sources referring to a 4 string guitar?
– ggcg
yesterday
1
1
You are correct, we do not tune the guitar like that. We usually start with relative tuning but adjust by comparing harmonics and open string octaves. In other words the high e is tuned rel to the low E harmonic and intermediate strings adjusted until (at least for acoustics) resonances with open strings are observed.
– ggcg
yesterday
You are correct, we do not tune the guitar like that. We usually start with relative tuning but adjust by comparing harmonics and open string octaves. In other words the high e is tuned rel to the low E harmonic and intermediate strings adjusted until (at least for acoustics) resonances with open strings are observed.
– ggcg
yesterday
2
2
@Tim Sure a perfect third exists - just climb up the harmonic ladder a bit. It just doesn't "exist" in tempered scales.
– Carl Witthoft
yesterday
@Tim Sure a perfect third exists - just climb up the harmonic ladder a bit. It just doesn't "exist" in tempered scales.
– Carl Witthoft
yesterday
1
1
you're confusing the term "perfect" with the term "just". In a sense, a "perfectly in tune interval" would be the just interval, but that's not what the word "perfect" means in a musical context.
– Some_Guy
9 hours ago
you're confusing the term "perfect" with the term "just". In a sense, a "perfectly in tune interval" would be the just interval, but that's not what the word "perfect" means in a musical context.
– Some_Guy
9 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
In just intonation, you'd be correct. However, in order for the interval between the top and bottom strings to be exactly two octaves, some compromise needs to be made. (That is, given that the intervals between the open strings are as you say, one major third and all the rest fourths.)
As you say, in just intonation, a perfect fourth is 4:3 and a major third is 5:4. Thus four perfect fourths and a major third are (4/3)^4 * (5/4) = (4^3*5) / (3^4) = 4 * 80/81. Two octaves is a straight 4, so we are too narrow by 81/80, which is a syntonic comma. In terms of cents (1200 cents = 1 octave), a syntonic comma is 21.506 cents. Thus, we must widen our fourths and our major third.
A just perfect fourth (4:3) is 498.045 cents. A just major third (5:4) is 386.314 cents. If we adopt 12-equal temperament, we widen each perfect fourth by 1.955 cents to 500 cents, and widen the major third by 13.686 cents to 400 cents. This widens by a total of 4*1.955 + 13.686 = 21.506 cents as required.
You are correct. I'm beginning to think that the intervals in WP table I referred to are actually 500 cents (2**(500/1200)) within precision. So I should tune my guitar in 12-TET then? Bye perfect just fourths, it was nice knowing you! :)
– Emanuel Landeholm
yesterday
9
Isn't this a "12 TET vs Pythagorean scale" issue, and not specific to the guitar?
– mkorman
yesterday
1
@mkorman It is indeed not specific to the guitar. I'd say it's an issue of the Pythagorean scale vs Just Intonation. The Pythagorean scale gives us the 81 (it can only produce ratios of powers of 3 to powers of 2). JI gives us the 5. The combo of the two gives us the syntonic comma 81:80. Trying to equate the two entails tempering the s.c. out, hence mean-tone temperaments. These are a family of which 12-equal is one member. You choose how much to narrow a fifth by, then every tone is 2 fifths minus an octave, and a major third is 2 tones.
– Rosie F
yesterday
It gets worse when considering that on guitar, the frets are straight, so in fact even if you just tune 2 separate strings to each other (perfectly) - playing a cord with the two further up the fretboard - you are back to out of (perfect) tune again.
– Stian Yttervik
17 hours ago
add a comment
|
This applies to all stringed instruments, not just fretted, or even strummed ones. The tuning compromises are messier with a guitar because of the mix of fourths and thirds between strings.
For us bowed instrument players, we tune the open strings as close to perfect fifths (or fourths, for the double bass) so that open strings will resonate "cleanly" against other open strings. We then do some compromising when playing, say, a double-stop with one fingered and one open string to get clean overtones.
Yes, of course... I was being careless with terminology. I actually meant stringed instruments. But I think the piano is a special case since you don't really walk up and down the neck, so to speak... The piano is like a guitar with 88 open strings.
– Emanuel Landeholm
yesterday
add a comment
|
"Perfect fourth" is not a mathematical calculation, but is used in context of music theory, where a perfect fourth would be 5 semitones. A fourth that is not perfect, would be augmented or diminished. Thirds are not described as perfect, instead they are major or minor.
Also, it should be noted that our (Western) scale is mathematically not as simple as dividing an octave into equal parts. There are many different models for calculating the scale. Pythagoras and Vallotti for instance had their ideas. The well tempered tuning is indeed a more equal tuning, but not all instruments use this tuning. String players often tune their instruments to a more 'natural' theme, having the perfect fifth intervals of their strings according to the natural fifth overtone.
New contributor
1
However, if you tune a guitar naturally (all fourth are exactly 4/3), you'll get problems with many chords sounding quite a bit off. Especially A and D based chords because they have an octave formed by the open A/D string and the 3rd fret on the H/E string. This octave will be significantly too large, and listeners with a good musical ear will notice. Thus, in order to get a sensible guitar tuning, the fourths must be stretched a bit.
– cmaster
21 hours ago
add a comment
|
Historically, instruments with a chromatic scale of fixed frets have always been tuned in the best approximation to Equal Temperament that the makers could achieve.
That includes guitars and their relations, but not lutes, where the frets were simply loops of gut tied round the neck of the instrument and therefore adjustable by the performer to play in any desired tuning system.
The earliest written records say that each fret was placed 1/18 of the distance between the preceding fret and the bridge. A simple-minded calculation says that is about 1 cent smaller than an exact ET semitone, but that ignores the effect of the height of the action on the intonation of a real instrument which tends to correct the error.
So whatever some modern "guys on the internet" think, real luthiers have known better for several hundred years already, and if you tune an open string and a fretted string in unison, you will automatically get the correctly tempered fourths.
New contributor
add a comment
|
The issue here is in interpreting “perfect fourth” as meaning “just intonated (perfect) fourth”. The interval from C to F (or E-A, A-D...) is a perfect fourth no matter what intonation is. Here, perfect distinguishes the interval from augmented and diminished fourths, and says nothing about the intonation.
Nowadays at least, guitars are tuned equal temperament, so the intervals across the 6 strings do add up to two octaves.
add a comment
|
The perfect fourth in equal temperament is 2 to the power of (5/12), or 1.334839..., not 4/3 = 1.333333...
That said, stringed instruments are not tuned exactly to equal temperament anyway. Firstly, consider the stretch tuning phenomenon exhibited by pianos. Higher notes on the keyboard are sharp relative to the equal temperament math, lower notes slightly flat. This is because the fundamentals of notes in higher octaves are tuned not to clash with the harmonics of notes in lower octaves. The harmonics of a non-ideal, real-world string are sharp compared to what the math says for an idealized string.
Guitarists follow various methods of tuning, some of them even personalized. What comes into play also is the imperfect intonation of the guitar. There are tuning methods that involve matching octaves on non-adjacent strings. For instance, the D string might be tuned by fretting an E, and tuning that against the open E string one octave below. Also, if you naively tune the open strings, the notes above the twelfth fret will likely not be in tune due to intonation imperfections. There are tuning methods involving tuning notes in the middle of the neck to create the best compromise over the fretboard. I usually begin tuning a guitar, or check its tuning, using the 440 Hz A on the B string at the 10th fret.
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "240"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f89865%2f12tet-vs-pythagorean-scales-perfect-fourths%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
In just intonation, you'd be correct. However, in order for the interval between the top and bottom strings to be exactly two octaves, some compromise needs to be made. (That is, given that the intervals between the open strings are as you say, one major third and all the rest fourths.)
As you say, in just intonation, a perfect fourth is 4:3 and a major third is 5:4. Thus four perfect fourths and a major third are (4/3)^4 * (5/4) = (4^3*5) / (3^4) = 4 * 80/81. Two octaves is a straight 4, so we are too narrow by 81/80, which is a syntonic comma. In terms of cents (1200 cents = 1 octave), a syntonic comma is 21.506 cents. Thus, we must widen our fourths and our major third.
A just perfect fourth (4:3) is 498.045 cents. A just major third (5:4) is 386.314 cents. If we adopt 12-equal temperament, we widen each perfect fourth by 1.955 cents to 500 cents, and widen the major third by 13.686 cents to 400 cents. This widens by a total of 4*1.955 + 13.686 = 21.506 cents as required.
You are correct. I'm beginning to think that the intervals in WP table I referred to are actually 500 cents (2**(500/1200)) within precision. So I should tune my guitar in 12-TET then? Bye perfect just fourths, it was nice knowing you! :)
– Emanuel Landeholm
yesterday
9
Isn't this a "12 TET vs Pythagorean scale" issue, and not specific to the guitar?
– mkorman
yesterday
1
@mkorman It is indeed not specific to the guitar. I'd say it's an issue of the Pythagorean scale vs Just Intonation. The Pythagorean scale gives us the 81 (it can only produce ratios of powers of 3 to powers of 2). JI gives us the 5. The combo of the two gives us the syntonic comma 81:80. Trying to equate the two entails tempering the s.c. out, hence mean-tone temperaments. These are a family of which 12-equal is one member. You choose how much to narrow a fifth by, then every tone is 2 fifths minus an octave, and a major third is 2 tones.
– Rosie F
yesterday
It gets worse when considering that on guitar, the frets are straight, so in fact even if you just tune 2 separate strings to each other (perfectly) - playing a cord with the two further up the fretboard - you are back to out of (perfect) tune again.
– Stian Yttervik
17 hours ago
add a comment
|
In just intonation, you'd be correct. However, in order for the interval between the top and bottom strings to be exactly two octaves, some compromise needs to be made. (That is, given that the intervals between the open strings are as you say, one major third and all the rest fourths.)
As you say, in just intonation, a perfect fourth is 4:3 and a major third is 5:4. Thus four perfect fourths and a major third are (4/3)^4 * (5/4) = (4^3*5) / (3^4) = 4 * 80/81. Two octaves is a straight 4, so we are too narrow by 81/80, which is a syntonic comma. In terms of cents (1200 cents = 1 octave), a syntonic comma is 21.506 cents. Thus, we must widen our fourths and our major third.
A just perfect fourth (4:3) is 498.045 cents. A just major third (5:4) is 386.314 cents. If we adopt 12-equal temperament, we widen each perfect fourth by 1.955 cents to 500 cents, and widen the major third by 13.686 cents to 400 cents. This widens by a total of 4*1.955 + 13.686 = 21.506 cents as required.
You are correct. I'm beginning to think that the intervals in WP table I referred to are actually 500 cents (2**(500/1200)) within precision. So I should tune my guitar in 12-TET then? Bye perfect just fourths, it was nice knowing you! :)
– Emanuel Landeholm
yesterday
9
Isn't this a "12 TET vs Pythagorean scale" issue, and not specific to the guitar?
– mkorman
yesterday
1
@mkorman It is indeed not specific to the guitar. I'd say it's an issue of the Pythagorean scale vs Just Intonation. The Pythagorean scale gives us the 81 (it can only produce ratios of powers of 3 to powers of 2). JI gives us the 5. The combo of the two gives us the syntonic comma 81:80. Trying to equate the two entails tempering the s.c. out, hence mean-tone temperaments. These are a family of which 12-equal is one member. You choose how much to narrow a fifth by, then every tone is 2 fifths minus an octave, and a major third is 2 tones.
– Rosie F
yesterday
It gets worse when considering that on guitar, the frets are straight, so in fact even if you just tune 2 separate strings to each other (perfectly) - playing a cord with the two further up the fretboard - you are back to out of (perfect) tune again.
– Stian Yttervik
17 hours ago
add a comment
|
In just intonation, you'd be correct. However, in order for the interval between the top and bottom strings to be exactly two octaves, some compromise needs to be made. (That is, given that the intervals between the open strings are as you say, one major third and all the rest fourths.)
As you say, in just intonation, a perfect fourth is 4:3 and a major third is 5:4. Thus four perfect fourths and a major third are (4/3)^4 * (5/4) = (4^3*5) / (3^4) = 4 * 80/81. Two octaves is a straight 4, so we are too narrow by 81/80, which is a syntonic comma. In terms of cents (1200 cents = 1 octave), a syntonic comma is 21.506 cents. Thus, we must widen our fourths and our major third.
A just perfect fourth (4:3) is 498.045 cents. A just major third (5:4) is 386.314 cents. If we adopt 12-equal temperament, we widen each perfect fourth by 1.955 cents to 500 cents, and widen the major third by 13.686 cents to 400 cents. This widens by a total of 4*1.955 + 13.686 = 21.506 cents as required.
In just intonation, you'd be correct. However, in order for the interval between the top and bottom strings to be exactly two octaves, some compromise needs to be made. (That is, given that the intervals between the open strings are as you say, one major third and all the rest fourths.)
As you say, in just intonation, a perfect fourth is 4:3 and a major third is 5:4. Thus four perfect fourths and a major third are (4/3)^4 * (5/4) = (4^3*5) / (3^4) = 4 * 80/81. Two octaves is a straight 4, so we are too narrow by 81/80, which is a syntonic comma. In terms of cents (1200 cents = 1 octave), a syntonic comma is 21.506 cents. Thus, we must widen our fourths and our major third.
A just perfect fourth (4:3) is 498.045 cents. A just major third (5:4) is 386.314 cents. If we adopt 12-equal temperament, we widen each perfect fourth by 1.955 cents to 500 cents, and widen the major third by 13.686 cents to 400 cents. This widens by a total of 4*1.955 + 13.686 = 21.506 cents as required.
answered yesterday
Rosie FRosie F
2,2306 silver badges17 bronze badges
2,2306 silver badges17 bronze badges
You are correct. I'm beginning to think that the intervals in WP table I referred to are actually 500 cents (2**(500/1200)) within precision. So I should tune my guitar in 12-TET then? Bye perfect just fourths, it was nice knowing you! :)
– Emanuel Landeholm
yesterday
9
Isn't this a "12 TET vs Pythagorean scale" issue, and not specific to the guitar?
– mkorman
yesterday
1
@mkorman It is indeed not specific to the guitar. I'd say it's an issue of the Pythagorean scale vs Just Intonation. The Pythagorean scale gives us the 81 (it can only produce ratios of powers of 3 to powers of 2). JI gives us the 5. The combo of the two gives us the syntonic comma 81:80. Trying to equate the two entails tempering the s.c. out, hence mean-tone temperaments. These are a family of which 12-equal is one member. You choose how much to narrow a fifth by, then every tone is 2 fifths minus an octave, and a major third is 2 tones.
– Rosie F
yesterday
It gets worse when considering that on guitar, the frets are straight, so in fact even if you just tune 2 separate strings to each other (perfectly) - playing a cord with the two further up the fretboard - you are back to out of (perfect) tune again.
– Stian Yttervik
17 hours ago
add a comment
|
You are correct. I'm beginning to think that the intervals in WP table I referred to are actually 500 cents (2**(500/1200)) within precision. So I should tune my guitar in 12-TET then? Bye perfect just fourths, it was nice knowing you! :)
– Emanuel Landeholm
yesterday
9
Isn't this a "12 TET vs Pythagorean scale" issue, and not specific to the guitar?
– mkorman
yesterday
1
@mkorman It is indeed not specific to the guitar. I'd say it's an issue of the Pythagorean scale vs Just Intonation. The Pythagorean scale gives us the 81 (it can only produce ratios of powers of 3 to powers of 2). JI gives us the 5. The combo of the two gives us the syntonic comma 81:80. Trying to equate the two entails tempering the s.c. out, hence mean-tone temperaments. These are a family of which 12-equal is one member. You choose how much to narrow a fifth by, then every tone is 2 fifths minus an octave, and a major third is 2 tones.
– Rosie F
yesterday
It gets worse when considering that on guitar, the frets are straight, so in fact even if you just tune 2 separate strings to each other (perfectly) - playing a cord with the two further up the fretboard - you are back to out of (perfect) tune again.
– Stian Yttervik
17 hours ago
You are correct. I'm beginning to think that the intervals in WP table I referred to are actually 500 cents (2**(500/1200)) within precision. So I should tune my guitar in 12-TET then? Bye perfect just fourths, it was nice knowing you! :)
– Emanuel Landeholm
yesterday
You are correct. I'm beginning to think that the intervals in WP table I referred to are actually 500 cents (2**(500/1200)) within precision. So I should tune my guitar in 12-TET then? Bye perfect just fourths, it was nice knowing you! :)
– Emanuel Landeholm
yesterday
9
9
Isn't this a "12 TET vs Pythagorean scale" issue, and not specific to the guitar?
– mkorman
yesterday
Isn't this a "12 TET vs Pythagorean scale" issue, and not specific to the guitar?
– mkorman
yesterday
1
1
@mkorman It is indeed not specific to the guitar. I'd say it's an issue of the Pythagorean scale vs Just Intonation. The Pythagorean scale gives us the 81 (it can only produce ratios of powers of 3 to powers of 2). JI gives us the 5. The combo of the two gives us the syntonic comma 81:80. Trying to equate the two entails tempering the s.c. out, hence mean-tone temperaments. These are a family of which 12-equal is one member. You choose how much to narrow a fifth by, then every tone is 2 fifths minus an octave, and a major third is 2 tones.
– Rosie F
yesterday
@mkorman It is indeed not specific to the guitar. I'd say it's an issue of the Pythagorean scale vs Just Intonation. The Pythagorean scale gives us the 81 (it can only produce ratios of powers of 3 to powers of 2). JI gives us the 5. The combo of the two gives us the syntonic comma 81:80. Trying to equate the two entails tempering the s.c. out, hence mean-tone temperaments. These are a family of which 12-equal is one member. You choose how much to narrow a fifth by, then every tone is 2 fifths minus an octave, and a major third is 2 tones.
– Rosie F
yesterday
It gets worse when considering that on guitar, the frets are straight, so in fact even if you just tune 2 separate strings to each other (perfectly) - playing a cord with the two further up the fretboard - you are back to out of (perfect) tune again.
– Stian Yttervik
17 hours ago
It gets worse when considering that on guitar, the frets are straight, so in fact even if you just tune 2 separate strings to each other (perfectly) - playing a cord with the two further up the fretboard - you are back to out of (perfect) tune again.
– Stian Yttervik
17 hours ago
add a comment
|
This applies to all stringed instruments, not just fretted, or even strummed ones. The tuning compromises are messier with a guitar because of the mix of fourths and thirds between strings.
For us bowed instrument players, we tune the open strings as close to perfect fifths (or fourths, for the double bass) so that open strings will resonate "cleanly" against other open strings. We then do some compromising when playing, say, a double-stop with one fingered and one open string to get clean overtones.
Yes, of course... I was being careless with terminology. I actually meant stringed instruments. But I think the piano is a special case since you don't really walk up and down the neck, so to speak... The piano is like a guitar with 88 open strings.
– Emanuel Landeholm
yesterday
add a comment
|
This applies to all stringed instruments, not just fretted, or even strummed ones. The tuning compromises are messier with a guitar because of the mix of fourths and thirds between strings.
For us bowed instrument players, we tune the open strings as close to perfect fifths (or fourths, for the double bass) so that open strings will resonate "cleanly" against other open strings. We then do some compromising when playing, say, a double-stop with one fingered and one open string to get clean overtones.
Yes, of course... I was being careless with terminology. I actually meant stringed instruments. But I think the piano is a special case since you don't really walk up and down the neck, so to speak... The piano is like a guitar with 88 open strings.
– Emanuel Landeholm
yesterday
add a comment
|
This applies to all stringed instruments, not just fretted, or even strummed ones. The tuning compromises are messier with a guitar because of the mix of fourths and thirds between strings.
For us bowed instrument players, we tune the open strings as close to perfect fifths (or fourths, for the double bass) so that open strings will resonate "cleanly" against other open strings. We then do some compromising when playing, say, a double-stop with one fingered and one open string to get clean overtones.
This applies to all stringed instruments, not just fretted, or even strummed ones. The tuning compromises are messier with a guitar because of the mix of fourths and thirds between strings.
For us bowed instrument players, we tune the open strings as close to perfect fifths (or fourths, for the double bass) so that open strings will resonate "cleanly" against other open strings. We then do some compromising when playing, say, a double-stop with one fingered and one open string to get clean overtones.
answered yesterday
Carl WitthoftCarl Witthoft
10.7k2 gold badges15 silver badges32 bronze badges
10.7k2 gold badges15 silver badges32 bronze badges
Yes, of course... I was being careless with terminology. I actually meant stringed instruments. But I think the piano is a special case since you don't really walk up and down the neck, so to speak... The piano is like a guitar with 88 open strings.
– Emanuel Landeholm
yesterday
add a comment
|
Yes, of course... I was being careless with terminology. I actually meant stringed instruments. But I think the piano is a special case since you don't really walk up and down the neck, so to speak... The piano is like a guitar with 88 open strings.
– Emanuel Landeholm
yesterday
Yes, of course... I was being careless with terminology. I actually meant stringed instruments. But I think the piano is a special case since you don't really walk up and down the neck, so to speak... The piano is like a guitar with 88 open strings.
– Emanuel Landeholm
yesterday
Yes, of course... I was being careless with terminology. I actually meant stringed instruments. But I think the piano is a special case since you don't really walk up and down the neck, so to speak... The piano is like a guitar with 88 open strings.
– Emanuel Landeholm
yesterday
add a comment
|
"Perfect fourth" is not a mathematical calculation, but is used in context of music theory, where a perfect fourth would be 5 semitones. A fourth that is not perfect, would be augmented or diminished. Thirds are not described as perfect, instead they are major or minor.
Also, it should be noted that our (Western) scale is mathematically not as simple as dividing an octave into equal parts. There are many different models for calculating the scale. Pythagoras and Vallotti for instance had their ideas. The well tempered tuning is indeed a more equal tuning, but not all instruments use this tuning. String players often tune their instruments to a more 'natural' theme, having the perfect fifth intervals of their strings according to the natural fifth overtone.
New contributor
1
However, if you tune a guitar naturally (all fourth are exactly 4/3), you'll get problems with many chords sounding quite a bit off. Especially A and D based chords because they have an octave formed by the open A/D string and the 3rd fret on the H/E string. This octave will be significantly too large, and listeners with a good musical ear will notice. Thus, in order to get a sensible guitar tuning, the fourths must be stretched a bit.
– cmaster
21 hours ago
add a comment
|
"Perfect fourth" is not a mathematical calculation, but is used in context of music theory, where a perfect fourth would be 5 semitones. A fourth that is not perfect, would be augmented or diminished. Thirds are not described as perfect, instead they are major or minor.
Also, it should be noted that our (Western) scale is mathematically not as simple as dividing an octave into equal parts. There are many different models for calculating the scale. Pythagoras and Vallotti for instance had their ideas. The well tempered tuning is indeed a more equal tuning, but not all instruments use this tuning. String players often tune their instruments to a more 'natural' theme, having the perfect fifth intervals of their strings according to the natural fifth overtone.
New contributor
1
However, if you tune a guitar naturally (all fourth are exactly 4/3), you'll get problems with many chords sounding quite a bit off. Especially A and D based chords because they have an octave formed by the open A/D string and the 3rd fret on the H/E string. This octave will be significantly too large, and listeners with a good musical ear will notice. Thus, in order to get a sensible guitar tuning, the fourths must be stretched a bit.
– cmaster
21 hours ago
add a comment
|
"Perfect fourth" is not a mathematical calculation, but is used in context of music theory, where a perfect fourth would be 5 semitones. A fourth that is not perfect, would be augmented or diminished. Thirds are not described as perfect, instead they are major or minor.
Also, it should be noted that our (Western) scale is mathematically not as simple as dividing an octave into equal parts. There are many different models for calculating the scale. Pythagoras and Vallotti for instance had their ideas. The well tempered tuning is indeed a more equal tuning, but not all instruments use this tuning. String players often tune their instruments to a more 'natural' theme, having the perfect fifth intervals of their strings according to the natural fifth overtone.
New contributor
"Perfect fourth" is not a mathematical calculation, but is used in context of music theory, where a perfect fourth would be 5 semitones. A fourth that is not perfect, would be augmented or diminished. Thirds are not described as perfect, instead they are major or minor.
Also, it should be noted that our (Western) scale is mathematically not as simple as dividing an octave into equal parts. There are many different models for calculating the scale. Pythagoras and Vallotti for instance had their ideas. The well tempered tuning is indeed a more equal tuning, but not all instruments use this tuning. String players often tune their instruments to a more 'natural' theme, having the perfect fifth intervals of their strings according to the natural fifth overtone.
New contributor
New contributor
answered yesterday
StefStef
1513 bronze badges
1513 bronze badges
New contributor
New contributor
1
However, if you tune a guitar naturally (all fourth are exactly 4/3), you'll get problems with many chords sounding quite a bit off. Especially A and D based chords because they have an octave formed by the open A/D string and the 3rd fret on the H/E string. This octave will be significantly too large, and listeners with a good musical ear will notice. Thus, in order to get a sensible guitar tuning, the fourths must be stretched a bit.
– cmaster
21 hours ago
add a comment
|
1
However, if you tune a guitar naturally (all fourth are exactly 4/3), you'll get problems with many chords sounding quite a bit off. Especially A and D based chords because they have an octave formed by the open A/D string and the 3rd fret on the H/E string. This octave will be significantly too large, and listeners with a good musical ear will notice. Thus, in order to get a sensible guitar tuning, the fourths must be stretched a bit.
– cmaster
21 hours ago
1
1
However, if you tune a guitar naturally (all fourth are exactly 4/3), you'll get problems with many chords sounding quite a bit off. Especially A and D based chords because they have an octave formed by the open A/D string and the 3rd fret on the H/E string. This octave will be significantly too large, and listeners with a good musical ear will notice. Thus, in order to get a sensible guitar tuning, the fourths must be stretched a bit.
– cmaster
21 hours ago
However, if you tune a guitar naturally (all fourth are exactly 4/3), you'll get problems with many chords sounding quite a bit off. Especially A and D based chords because they have an octave formed by the open A/D string and the 3rd fret on the H/E string. This octave will be significantly too large, and listeners with a good musical ear will notice. Thus, in order to get a sensible guitar tuning, the fourths must be stretched a bit.
– cmaster
21 hours ago
add a comment
|
Historically, instruments with a chromatic scale of fixed frets have always been tuned in the best approximation to Equal Temperament that the makers could achieve.
That includes guitars and their relations, but not lutes, where the frets were simply loops of gut tied round the neck of the instrument and therefore adjustable by the performer to play in any desired tuning system.
The earliest written records say that each fret was placed 1/18 of the distance between the preceding fret and the bridge. A simple-minded calculation says that is about 1 cent smaller than an exact ET semitone, but that ignores the effect of the height of the action on the intonation of a real instrument which tends to correct the error.
So whatever some modern "guys on the internet" think, real luthiers have known better for several hundred years already, and if you tune an open string and a fretted string in unison, you will automatically get the correctly tempered fourths.
New contributor
add a comment
|
Historically, instruments with a chromatic scale of fixed frets have always been tuned in the best approximation to Equal Temperament that the makers could achieve.
That includes guitars and their relations, but not lutes, where the frets were simply loops of gut tied round the neck of the instrument and therefore adjustable by the performer to play in any desired tuning system.
The earliest written records say that each fret was placed 1/18 of the distance between the preceding fret and the bridge. A simple-minded calculation says that is about 1 cent smaller than an exact ET semitone, but that ignores the effect of the height of the action on the intonation of a real instrument which tends to correct the error.
So whatever some modern "guys on the internet" think, real luthiers have known better for several hundred years already, and if you tune an open string and a fretted string in unison, you will automatically get the correctly tempered fourths.
New contributor
add a comment
|
Historically, instruments with a chromatic scale of fixed frets have always been tuned in the best approximation to Equal Temperament that the makers could achieve.
That includes guitars and their relations, but not lutes, where the frets were simply loops of gut tied round the neck of the instrument and therefore adjustable by the performer to play in any desired tuning system.
The earliest written records say that each fret was placed 1/18 of the distance between the preceding fret and the bridge. A simple-minded calculation says that is about 1 cent smaller than an exact ET semitone, but that ignores the effect of the height of the action on the intonation of a real instrument which tends to correct the error.
So whatever some modern "guys on the internet" think, real luthiers have known better for several hundred years already, and if you tune an open string and a fretted string in unison, you will automatically get the correctly tempered fourths.
New contributor
Historically, instruments with a chromatic scale of fixed frets have always been tuned in the best approximation to Equal Temperament that the makers could achieve.
That includes guitars and their relations, but not lutes, where the frets were simply loops of gut tied round the neck of the instrument and therefore adjustable by the performer to play in any desired tuning system.
The earliest written records say that each fret was placed 1/18 of the distance between the preceding fret and the bridge. A simple-minded calculation says that is about 1 cent smaller than an exact ET semitone, but that ignores the effect of the height of the action on the intonation of a real instrument which tends to correct the error.
So whatever some modern "guys on the internet" think, real luthiers have known better for several hundred years already, and if you tune an open string and a fretted string in unison, you will automatically get the correctly tempered fourths.
New contributor
New contributor
answered yesterday
guestguest
311 bronze badge
311 bronze badge
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
The issue here is in interpreting “perfect fourth” as meaning “just intonated (perfect) fourth”. The interval from C to F (or E-A, A-D...) is a perfect fourth no matter what intonation is. Here, perfect distinguishes the interval from augmented and diminished fourths, and says nothing about the intonation.
Nowadays at least, guitars are tuned equal temperament, so the intervals across the 6 strings do add up to two octaves.
add a comment
|
The issue here is in interpreting “perfect fourth” as meaning “just intonated (perfect) fourth”. The interval from C to F (or E-A, A-D...) is a perfect fourth no matter what intonation is. Here, perfect distinguishes the interval from augmented and diminished fourths, and says nothing about the intonation.
Nowadays at least, guitars are tuned equal temperament, so the intervals across the 6 strings do add up to two octaves.
add a comment
|
The issue here is in interpreting “perfect fourth” as meaning “just intonated (perfect) fourth”. The interval from C to F (or E-A, A-D...) is a perfect fourth no matter what intonation is. Here, perfect distinguishes the interval from augmented and diminished fourths, and says nothing about the intonation.
Nowadays at least, guitars are tuned equal temperament, so the intervals across the 6 strings do add up to two octaves.
The issue here is in interpreting “perfect fourth” as meaning “just intonated (perfect) fourth”. The interval from C to F (or E-A, A-D...) is a perfect fourth no matter what intonation is. Here, perfect distinguishes the interval from augmented and diminished fourths, and says nothing about the intonation.
Nowadays at least, guitars are tuned equal temperament, so the intervals across the 6 strings do add up to two octaves.
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
DaveDave
14.9k7 gold badges52 silver badges88 bronze badges
14.9k7 gold badges52 silver badges88 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
The perfect fourth in equal temperament is 2 to the power of (5/12), or 1.334839..., not 4/3 = 1.333333...
That said, stringed instruments are not tuned exactly to equal temperament anyway. Firstly, consider the stretch tuning phenomenon exhibited by pianos. Higher notes on the keyboard are sharp relative to the equal temperament math, lower notes slightly flat. This is because the fundamentals of notes in higher octaves are tuned not to clash with the harmonics of notes in lower octaves. The harmonics of a non-ideal, real-world string are sharp compared to what the math says for an idealized string.
Guitarists follow various methods of tuning, some of them even personalized. What comes into play also is the imperfect intonation of the guitar. There are tuning methods that involve matching octaves on non-adjacent strings. For instance, the D string might be tuned by fretting an E, and tuning that against the open E string one octave below. Also, if you naively tune the open strings, the notes above the twelfth fret will likely not be in tune due to intonation imperfections. There are tuning methods involving tuning notes in the middle of the neck to create the best compromise over the fretboard. I usually begin tuning a guitar, or check its tuning, using the 440 Hz A on the B string at the 10th fret.
add a comment
|
The perfect fourth in equal temperament is 2 to the power of (5/12), or 1.334839..., not 4/3 = 1.333333...
That said, stringed instruments are not tuned exactly to equal temperament anyway. Firstly, consider the stretch tuning phenomenon exhibited by pianos. Higher notes on the keyboard are sharp relative to the equal temperament math, lower notes slightly flat. This is because the fundamentals of notes in higher octaves are tuned not to clash with the harmonics of notes in lower octaves. The harmonics of a non-ideal, real-world string are sharp compared to what the math says for an idealized string.
Guitarists follow various methods of tuning, some of them even personalized. What comes into play also is the imperfect intonation of the guitar. There are tuning methods that involve matching octaves on non-adjacent strings. For instance, the D string might be tuned by fretting an E, and tuning that against the open E string one octave below. Also, if you naively tune the open strings, the notes above the twelfth fret will likely not be in tune due to intonation imperfections. There are tuning methods involving tuning notes in the middle of the neck to create the best compromise over the fretboard. I usually begin tuning a guitar, or check its tuning, using the 440 Hz A on the B string at the 10th fret.
add a comment
|
The perfect fourth in equal temperament is 2 to the power of (5/12), or 1.334839..., not 4/3 = 1.333333...
That said, stringed instruments are not tuned exactly to equal temperament anyway. Firstly, consider the stretch tuning phenomenon exhibited by pianos. Higher notes on the keyboard are sharp relative to the equal temperament math, lower notes slightly flat. This is because the fundamentals of notes in higher octaves are tuned not to clash with the harmonics of notes in lower octaves. The harmonics of a non-ideal, real-world string are sharp compared to what the math says for an idealized string.
Guitarists follow various methods of tuning, some of them even personalized. What comes into play also is the imperfect intonation of the guitar. There are tuning methods that involve matching octaves on non-adjacent strings. For instance, the D string might be tuned by fretting an E, and tuning that against the open E string one octave below. Also, if you naively tune the open strings, the notes above the twelfth fret will likely not be in tune due to intonation imperfections. There are tuning methods involving tuning notes in the middle of the neck to create the best compromise over the fretboard. I usually begin tuning a guitar, or check its tuning, using the 440 Hz A on the B string at the 10th fret.
The perfect fourth in equal temperament is 2 to the power of (5/12), or 1.334839..., not 4/3 = 1.333333...
That said, stringed instruments are not tuned exactly to equal temperament anyway. Firstly, consider the stretch tuning phenomenon exhibited by pianos. Higher notes on the keyboard are sharp relative to the equal temperament math, lower notes slightly flat. This is because the fundamentals of notes in higher octaves are tuned not to clash with the harmonics of notes in lower octaves. The harmonics of a non-ideal, real-world string are sharp compared to what the math says for an idealized string.
Guitarists follow various methods of tuning, some of them even personalized. What comes into play also is the imperfect intonation of the guitar. There are tuning methods that involve matching octaves on non-adjacent strings. For instance, the D string might be tuned by fretting an E, and tuning that against the open E string one octave below. Also, if you naively tune the open strings, the notes above the twelfth fret will likely not be in tune due to intonation imperfections. There are tuning methods involving tuning notes in the middle of the neck to create the best compromise over the fretboard. I usually begin tuning a guitar, or check its tuning, using the 440 Hz A on the B string at the 10th fret.
answered 10 hours ago
KazKaz
2,60311 silver badges10 bronze badges
2,60311 silver badges10 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
Thanks for contributing an answer to Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f89865%2f12tet-vs-pythagorean-scales-perfect-fourths%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
5
'Perfect thirds' don't exist. On guitar, between G and B is M3. Maybe our ears compensate a little for the 'out of tune'. Also bear in mind that each string is a slightly different length to comensate for intonation caused by the fretwires being perpendicular to all the strings.
– Tim
yesterday
Are these sources referring to a 4 string guitar?
– ggcg
yesterday
1
You are correct, we do not tune the guitar like that. We usually start with relative tuning but adjust by comparing harmonics and open string octaves. In other words the high e is tuned rel to the low E harmonic and intermediate strings adjusted until (at least for acoustics) resonances with open strings are observed.
– ggcg
yesterday
2
@Tim Sure a perfect third exists - just climb up the harmonic ladder a bit. It just doesn't "exist" in tempered scales.
– Carl Witthoft
yesterday
1
you're confusing the term "perfect" with the term "just". In a sense, a "perfectly in tune interval" would be the just interval, but that's not what the word "perfect" means in a musical context.
– Some_Guy
9 hours ago