Turning an Abelian Group into a Vector SpaceAre these vector spaces?Proving a subspace of $mathbbR^2$ is still a vector space with redefined addition / scalar multiplication operations?Define two differents vector space structures over a field on an abelian groupnumber of differents vector space structures over the same field $mathbbF$ on an abelian groupgroups products vs vector space productsCan we define a binary operation on $mathbb Z$ to make it a vector space over $mathbb Q$?Vector spaces: Is (the) scalar multiplication unique?Is a vector space a subset of an abelian group?An abelian group as an $mathbb F_2$-vector spaceCan an abelian group be a real vector space in more than one way?

What should be done with the carbon when using magic to get oxygen from carbon dioxide?

Is it possible for a person to be tricked into becoming a lich?

Can two aircraft be allowed to stay on the same runway at the same time?

What's the origin of the concept of alternate dimensions/realities?

Are sweatpants frowned upon on flights?

In Endgame, wouldn't Stark have remembered Hulk busting out of the stairwell?

Properly unlinking hard links

Is this homebrew "Faerie Fire Grenade" unbalanced?

Can I leave a large suitcase at TPE during a 4-hour layover, and pick it up 4.5 days later when I come back to TPE on my way to Taipei downtown?

Who declared the Last Alliance to be the "last" and why?

Group riding etiquette

What is the following VRP?

Create a list of snaking numbers under 50,000

Why are JWST optics not enclosed like HST?

How do I keep my animals from eating my people food?

Storing milk for long periods of time

Turning an Abelian Group into a Vector Space

Understanding data transmission rates over copper wire

Can UV radiation be safe for the skin?

In what language did Túrin converse with Mím?

What are ways to record who took the pictures if a camera is used by multiple people?

Why did I get UK entry stamps in my British passport?

How do I get my neighbour to stop disturbing with loud music?

Are there indian reservations in United States where you can't live if you aren't a tribal member?



Turning an Abelian Group into a Vector Space


Are these vector spaces?Proving a subspace of $mathbbR^2$ is still a vector space with redefined addition / scalar multiplication operations?Define two differents vector space structures over a field on an abelian groupnumber of differents vector space structures over the same field $mathbbF$ on an abelian groupgroups products vs vector space productsCan we define a binary operation on $mathbb Z$ to make it a vector space over $mathbb Q$?Vector spaces: Is (the) scalar multiplication unique?Is a vector space a subset of an abelian group?An abelian group as an $mathbb F_2$-vector spaceCan an abelian group be a real vector space in more than one way?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








5












$begingroup$


This question is inspired by the question Are these vector spaces? but is free-standing.



Suppose $mathbbF$ is a field, and that $X$ is the multiplicative group of $mathbbF$.



Let us write this abelian group $X$ additively. To be precise the set is $mathbbFsetminus0$, the zero element is $hat0:=1$, the addition operation is $x hat+y:=xy$, and the negative operation is $widehat-x:=x^-1$.



Let $V$ be the abelian group of $n$-tuples $X^n$ with the usual co-ordinatewise operations.



Question : Can we define an $mathbbF$-scalar multiplication on $V$ so that $V$ becomes an $mathbbF$-vector space?



By looking at $-1$ in $mathbbF$, which satisfies $(-1)hat+(-1)=(-1)^2=1=hat0$ we see that if there is to be any chance of turning $V$ into a vector space then the field $mathbbF$ must have characteristic $2$. More than that, a similar argument on $(2^k -1)$-th roots of unity will show that $mathbbF$ has no finite subfields $mathbbF_2^k$ except $mathbbF_2$. Beyond that I cannot go.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




















    5












    $begingroup$


    This question is inspired by the question Are these vector spaces? but is free-standing.



    Suppose $mathbbF$ is a field, and that $X$ is the multiplicative group of $mathbbF$.



    Let us write this abelian group $X$ additively. To be precise the set is $mathbbFsetminus0$, the zero element is $hat0:=1$, the addition operation is $x hat+y:=xy$, and the negative operation is $widehat-x:=x^-1$.



    Let $V$ be the abelian group of $n$-tuples $X^n$ with the usual co-ordinatewise operations.



    Question : Can we define an $mathbbF$-scalar multiplication on $V$ so that $V$ becomes an $mathbbF$-vector space?



    By looking at $-1$ in $mathbbF$, which satisfies $(-1)hat+(-1)=(-1)^2=1=hat0$ we see that if there is to be any chance of turning $V$ into a vector space then the field $mathbbF$ must have characteristic $2$. More than that, a similar argument on $(2^k -1)$-th roots of unity will show that $mathbbF$ has no finite subfields $mathbbF_2^k$ except $mathbbF_2$. Beyond that I cannot go.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$
















      5












      5








      5


      3



      $begingroup$


      This question is inspired by the question Are these vector spaces? but is free-standing.



      Suppose $mathbbF$ is a field, and that $X$ is the multiplicative group of $mathbbF$.



      Let us write this abelian group $X$ additively. To be precise the set is $mathbbFsetminus0$, the zero element is $hat0:=1$, the addition operation is $x hat+y:=xy$, and the negative operation is $widehat-x:=x^-1$.



      Let $V$ be the abelian group of $n$-tuples $X^n$ with the usual co-ordinatewise operations.



      Question : Can we define an $mathbbF$-scalar multiplication on $V$ so that $V$ becomes an $mathbbF$-vector space?



      By looking at $-1$ in $mathbbF$, which satisfies $(-1)hat+(-1)=(-1)^2=1=hat0$ we see that if there is to be any chance of turning $V$ into a vector space then the field $mathbbF$ must have characteristic $2$. More than that, a similar argument on $(2^k -1)$-th roots of unity will show that $mathbbF$ has no finite subfields $mathbbF_2^k$ except $mathbbF_2$. Beyond that I cannot go.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      This question is inspired by the question Are these vector spaces? but is free-standing.



      Suppose $mathbbF$ is a field, and that $X$ is the multiplicative group of $mathbbF$.



      Let us write this abelian group $X$ additively. To be precise the set is $mathbbFsetminus0$, the zero element is $hat0:=1$, the addition operation is $x hat+y:=xy$, and the negative operation is $widehat-x:=x^-1$.



      Let $V$ be the abelian group of $n$-tuples $X^n$ with the usual co-ordinatewise operations.



      Question : Can we define an $mathbbF$-scalar multiplication on $V$ so that $V$ becomes an $mathbbF$-vector space?



      By looking at $-1$ in $mathbbF$, which satisfies $(-1)hat+(-1)=(-1)^2=1=hat0$ we see that if there is to be any chance of turning $V$ into a vector space then the field $mathbbF$ must have characteristic $2$. More than that, a similar argument on $(2^k -1)$-th roots of unity will show that $mathbbF$ has no finite subfields $mathbbF_2^k$ except $mathbbF_2$. Beyond that I cannot go.







      linear-algebra abstract-algebra vector-spaces commutative-algebra modules






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 7 hours ago









      Omnomnomnom

      133k7 gold badges98 silver badges198 bronze badges




      133k7 gold badges98 silver badges198 bronze badges










      asked 9 hours ago









      ancientmathematicianancientmathematician

      5,3971 gold badge6 silver badges17 bronze badges




      5,3971 gold badge6 silver badges17 bronze badges























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          7













          $begingroup$

          The answer is no except for the trivial case $mathbb F =mathbb F_2$ (in which $V=0$)



          Indeed, assume $mathbb F$ is such a field and take $xin mathbb F^*$. In the structure of $V$, we have $2cdot x = 0$, which translates to $x^2= 1$ in $mathbb F$ (for each coordinate).



          This implies that any element of $mathbb F$ is a root of $X^2-1$ which has at most to roots : $|mathbb F| leq 2$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            Fantastic! Any clue what $V otimes Bbb F_2^k$ looks like? Is it ever non-zero?
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            7 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @omnomnomnom : yes, in fact if $mathbb F$ is e.g. $mathbb F_2 (X) $ then its multiplicative group is free, so $Votimes mathbb F$ is a direct sum of copies of $mathbb F$
            $endgroup$
            – Max
            7 hours ago






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            @Omnomnomnom But for $mathbbF_2^k$ and $V=mathbbF_2^ksetminus0$ under multiplication, it is zero: every element of $V$ satisfies $v^2^k=v$, hence the generators are all zero: $votimesalpha = v^2^kotimesalpha = votimes(2^kalpha) = votimes 0 = mathbf0$.
            $endgroup$
            – Arturo Magidin
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Great, thanks to both of you
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            7 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @jyrkilahtonen : I think that's the case : the notation $mathbb F$ is used for both
            $endgroup$
            – Max
            7 hours ago


















          0













          $begingroup$

          Not an answer, but hopefully a useful observation. Your question (if I have understood it correctly) can be reframed as follows.




          We are given an abelian group $X = Bbb Fsetminus 0$, which we present as a $Bbb Z$-module where $x+y := xy$ and $nx := x^n$. Is it possible to take $V = X^n$ and extend multiplication by $Bbb Z$ into multiplication by $Bbb F$ in such a way that $V$ becomes a $Bbb F$-module (i.e. a vector space over $Bbb F$)?




          As Max's comment below observes: any $Bbb F$-space structure $V$ exists corresponds to an $Bbb F$-linear map $V otimes_Bbb Z Bbb F to V$. Notably, $V otimes_Bbb Z Bbb F$ is the usual extension of scalars.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            Why does $Votimes mathbb F = 0$ ? if it is the case then there is no $mathbb F$-vector space structure on $V$ as such a thing would be a map $Votimes mathbb Fto V$
            $endgroup$
            – Max
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Max I see no justification for my statement, now that I think about it. I'll remove it.
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            7 hours ago













          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3339244%2fturning-an-abelian-group-into-a-vector-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          7













          $begingroup$

          The answer is no except for the trivial case $mathbb F =mathbb F_2$ (in which $V=0$)



          Indeed, assume $mathbb F$ is such a field and take $xin mathbb F^*$. In the structure of $V$, we have $2cdot x = 0$, which translates to $x^2= 1$ in $mathbb F$ (for each coordinate).



          This implies that any element of $mathbb F$ is a root of $X^2-1$ which has at most to roots : $|mathbb F| leq 2$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            Fantastic! Any clue what $V otimes Bbb F_2^k$ looks like? Is it ever non-zero?
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            7 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @omnomnomnom : yes, in fact if $mathbb F$ is e.g. $mathbb F_2 (X) $ then its multiplicative group is free, so $Votimes mathbb F$ is a direct sum of copies of $mathbb F$
            $endgroup$
            – Max
            7 hours ago






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            @Omnomnomnom But for $mathbbF_2^k$ and $V=mathbbF_2^ksetminus0$ under multiplication, it is zero: every element of $V$ satisfies $v^2^k=v$, hence the generators are all zero: $votimesalpha = v^2^kotimesalpha = votimes(2^kalpha) = votimes 0 = mathbf0$.
            $endgroup$
            – Arturo Magidin
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Great, thanks to both of you
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            7 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @jyrkilahtonen : I think that's the case : the notation $mathbb F$ is used for both
            $endgroup$
            – Max
            7 hours ago















          7













          $begingroup$

          The answer is no except for the trivial case $mathbb F =mathbb F_2$ (in which $V=0$)



          Indeed, assume $mathbb F$ is such a field and take $xin mathbb F^*$. In the structure of $V$, we have $2cdot x = 0$, which translates to $x^2= 1$ in $mathbb F$ (for each coordinate).



          This implies that any element of $mathbb F$ is a root of $X^2-1$ which has at most to roots : $|mathbb F| leq 2$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            Fantastic! Any clue what $V otimes Bbb F_2^k$ looks like? Is it ever non-zero?
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            7 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @omnomnomnom : yes, in fact if $mathbb F$ is e.g. $mathbb F_2 (X) $ then its multiplicative group is free, so $Votimes mathbb F$ is a direct sum of copies of $mathbb F$
            $endgroup$
            – Max
            7 hours ago






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            @Omnomnomnom But for $mathbbF_2^k$ and $V=mathbbF_2^ksetminus0$ under multiplication, it is zero: every element of $V$ satisfies $v^2^k=v$, hence the generators are all zero: $votimesalpha = v^2^kotimesalpha = votimes(2^kalpha) = votimes 0 = mathbf0$.
            $endgroup$
            – Arturo Magidin
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Great, thanks to both of you
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            7 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @jyrkilahtonen : I think that's the case : the notation $mathbb F$ is used for both
            $endgroup$
            – Max
            7 hours ago













          7














          7










          7







          $begingroup$

          The answer is no except for the trivial case $mathbb F =mathbb F_2$ (in which $V=0$)



          Indeed, assume $mathbb F$ is such a field and take $xin mathbb F^*$. In the structure of $V$, we have $2cdot x = 0$, which translates to $x^2= 1$ in $mathbb F$ (for each coordinate).



          This implies that any element of $mathbb F$ is a root of $X^2-1$ which has at most to roots : $|mathbb F| leq 2$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          The answer is no except for the trivial case $mathbb F =mathbb F_2$ (in which $V=0$)



          Indeed, assume $mathbb F$ is such a field and take $xin mathbb F^*$. In the structure of $V$, we have $2cdot x = 0$, which translates to $x^2= 1$ in $mathbb F$ (for each coordinate).



          This implies that any element of $mathbb F$ is a root of $X^2-1$ which has at most to roots : $|mathbb F| leq 2$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 7 hours ago









          MaxMax

          23.2k1 gold badge12 silver badges54 bronze badges




          23.2k1 gold badge12 silver badges54 bronze badges














          • $begingroup$
            Fantastic! Any clue what $V otimes Bbb F_2^k$ looks like? Is it ever non-zero?
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            7 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @omnomnomnom : yes, in fact if $mathbb F$ is e.g. $mathbb F_2 (X) $ then its multiplicative group is free, so $Votimes mathbb F$ is a direct sum of copies of $mathbb F$
            $endgroup$
            – Max
            7 hours ago






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            @Omnomnomnom But for $mathbbF_2^k$ and $V=mathbbF_2^ksetminus0$ under multiplication, it is zero: every element of $V$ satisfies $v^2^k=v$, hence the generators are all zero: $votimesalpha = v^2^kotimesalpha = votimes(2^kalpha) = votimes 0 = mathbf0$.
            $endgroup$
            – Arturo Magidin
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Great, thanks to both of you
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            7 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @jyrkilahtonen : I think that's the case : the notation $mathbb F$ is used for both
            $endgroup$
            – Max
            7 hours ago
















          • $begingroup$
            Fantastic! Any clue what $V otimes Bbb F_2^k$ looks like? Is it ever non-zero?
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            7 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @omnomnomnom : yes, in fact if $mathbb F$ is e.g. $mathbb F_2 (X) $ then its multiplicative group is free, so $Votimes mathbb F$ is a direct sum of copies of $mathbb F$
            $endgroup$
            – Max
            7 hours ago






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            @Omnomnomnom But for $mathbbF_2^k$ and $V=mathbbF_2^ksetminus0$ under multiplication, it is zero: every element of $V$ satisfies $v^2^k=v$, hence the generators are all zero: $votimesalpha = v^2^kotimesalpha = votimes(2^kalpha) = votimes 0 = mathbf0$.
            $endgroup$
            – Arturo Magidin
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Great, thanks to both of you
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            7 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @jyrkilahtonen : I think that's the case : the notation $mathbb F$ is used for both
            $endgroup$
            – Max
            7 hours ago















          $begingroup$
          Fantastic! Any clue what $V otimes Bbb F_2^k$ looks like? Is it ever non-zero?
          $endgroup$
          – Omnomnomnom
          7 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Fantastic! Any clue what $V otimes Bbb F_2^k$ looks like? Is it ever non-zero?
          $endgroup$
          – Omnomnomnom
          7 hours ago




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @omnomnomnom : yes, in fact if $mathbb F$ is e.g. $mathbb F_2 (X) $ then its multiplicative group is free, so $Votimes mathbb F$ is a direct sum of copies of $mathbb F$
          $endgroup$
          – Max
          7 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          @omnomnomnom : yes, in fact if $mathbb F$ is e.g. $mathbb F_2 (X) $ then its multiplicative group is free, so $Votimes mathbb F$ is a direct sum of copies of $mathbb F$
          $endgroup$
          – Max
          7 hours ago




          2




          2




          $begingroup$
          @Omnomnomnom But for $mathbbF_2^k$ and $V=mathbbF_2^ksetminus0$ under multiplication, it is zero: every element of $V$ satisfies $v^2^k=v$, hence the generators are all zero: $votimesalpha = v^2^kotimesalpha = votimes(2^kalpha) = votimes 0 = mathbf0$.
          $endgroup$
          – Arturo Magidin
          7 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          @Omnomnomnom But for $mathbbF_2^k$ and $V=mathbbF_2^ksetminus0$ under multiplication, it is zero: every element of $V$ satisfies $v^2^k=v$, hence the generators are all zero: $votimesalpha = v^2^kotimesalpha = votimes(2^kalpha) = votimes 0 = mathbf0$.
          $endgroup$
          – Arturo Magidin
          7 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          Great, thanks to both of you
          $endgroup$
          – Omnomnomnom
          7 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Great, thanks to both of you
          $endgroup$
          – Omnomnomnom
          7 hours ago




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @jyrkilahtonen : I think that's the case : the notation $mathbb F$ is used for both
          $endgroup$
          – Max
          7 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          @jyrkilahtonen : I think that's the case : the notation $mathbb F$ is used for both
          $endgroup$
          – Max
          7 hours ago













          0













          $begingroup$

          Not an answer, but hopefully a useful observation. Your question (if I have understood it correctly) can be reframed as follows.




          We are given an abelian group $X = Bbb Fsetminus 0$, which we present as a $Bbb Z$-module where $x+y := xy$ and $nx := x^n$. Is it possible to take $V = X^n$ and extend multiplication by $Bbb Z$ into multiplication by $Bbb F$ in such a way that $V$ becomes a $Bbb F$-module (i.e. a vector space over $Bbb F$)?




          As Max's comment below observes: any $Bbb F$-space structure $V$ exists corresponds to an $Bbb F$-linear map $V otimes_Bbb Z Bbb F to V$. Notably, $V otimes_Bbb Z Bbb F$ is the usual extension of scalars.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            Why does $Votimes mathbb F = 0$ ? if it is the case then there is no $mathbb F$-vector space structure on $V$ as such a thing would be a map $Votimes mathbb Fto V$
            $endgroup$
            – Max
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Max I see no justification for my statement, now that I think about it. I'll remove it.
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            7 hours ago















          0













          $begingroup$

          Not an answer, but hopefully a useful observation. Your question (if I have understood it correctly) can be reframed as follows.




          We are given an abelian group $X = Bbb Fsetminus 0$, which we present as a $Bbb Z$-module where $x+y := xy$ and $nx := x^n$. Is it possible to take $V = X^n$ and extend multiplication by $Bbb Z$ into multiplication by $Bbb F$ in such a way that $V$ becomes a $Bbb F$-module (i.e. a vector space over $Bbb F$)?




          As Max's comment below observes: any $Bbb F$-space structure $V$ exists corresponds to an $Bbb F$-linear map $V otimes_Bbb Z Bbb F to V$. Notably, $V otimes_Bbb Z Bbb F$ is the usual extension of scalars.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            Why does $Votimes mathbb F = 0$ ? if it is the case then there is no $mathbb F$-vector space structure on $V$ as such a thing would be a map $Votimes mathbb Fto V$
            $endgroup$
            – Max
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Max I see no justification for my statement, now that I think about it. I'll remove it.
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            7 hours ago













          0














          0










          0







          $begingroup$

          Not an answer, but hopefully a useful observation. Your question (if I have understood it correctly) can be reframed as follows.




          We are given an abelian group $X = Bbb Fsetminus 0$, which we present as a $Bbb Z$-module where $x+y := xy$ and $nx := x^n$. Is it possible to take $V = X^n$ and extend multiplication by $Bbb Z$ into multiplication by $Bbb F$ in such a way that $V$ becomes a $Bbb F$-module (i.e. a vector space over $Bbb F$)?




          As Max's comment below observes: any $Bbb F$-space structure $V$ exists corresponds to an $Bbb F$-linear map $V otimes_Bbb Z Bbb F to V$. Notably, $V otimes_Bbb Z Bbb F$ is the usual extension of scalars.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Not an answer, but hopefully a useful observation. Your question (if I have understood it correctly) can be reframed as follows.




          We are given an abelian group $X = Bbb Fsetminus 0$, which we present as a $Bbb Z$-module where $x+y := xy$ and $nx := x^n$. Is it possible to take $V = X^n$ and extend multiplication by $Bbb Z$ into multiplication by $Bbb F$ in such a way that $V$ becomes a $Bbb F$-module (i.e. a vector space over $Bbb F$)?




          As Max's comment below observes: any $Bbb F$-space structure $V$ exists corresponds to an $Bbb F$-linear map $V otimes_Bbb Z Bbb F to V$. Notably, $V otimes_Bbb Z Bbb F$ is the usual extension of scalars.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 7 hours ago


























          community wiki





          3 revs
          Omnomnomnom















          • $begingroup$
            Why does $Votimes mathbb F = 0$ ? if it is the case then there is no $mathbb F$-vector space structure on $V$ as such a thing would be a map $Votimes mathbb Fto V$
            $endgroup$
            – Max
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Max I see no justification for my statement, now that I think about it. I'll remove it.
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            7 hours ago
















          • $begingroup$
            Why does $Votimes mathbb F = 0$ ? if it is the case then there is no $mathbb F$-vector space structure on $V$ as such a thing would be a map $Votimes mathbb Fto V$
            $endgroup$
            – Max
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Max I see no justification for my statement, now that I think about it. I'll remove it.
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            7 hours ago















          $begingroup$
          Why does $Votimes mathbb F = 0$ ? if it is the case then there is no $mathbb F$-vector space structure on $V$ as such a thing would be a map $Votimes mathbb Fto V$
          $endgroup$
          – Max
          7 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Why does $Votimes mathbb F = 0$ ? if it is the case then there is no $mathbb F$-vector space structure on $V$ as such a thing would be a map $Votimes mathbb Fto V$
          $endgroup$
          – Max
          7 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          @Max I see no justification for my statement, now that I think about it. I'll remove it.
          $endgroup$
          – Omnomnomnom
          7 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          @Max I see no justification for my statement, now that I think about it. I'll remove it.
          $endgroup$
          – Omnomnomnom
          7 hours ago

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3339244%2fturning-an-abelian-group-into-a-vector-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

          Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

          199年 目錄 大件事 到箇年出世嗰人 到箇年死嗰人 節慶、風俗習慣 導覽選單