What does “in the course of” mean?Big corporation in the UK, Intellectual Property and a ContractWhat can I do if I signed an excessively restrictive contract?Does a non-disparagement clause in a settlement cover the oppositions attorney?What does payable in advance mean?Legality of absolving martial arts class of responsibility if injury or death occurs?Job Contract Copyright WaiverLegal syntax question in the Canadian Copyright ActInventions Assignment Agreement in CaliforniaAssignment of Inventions in Employment Contract for Software DevelopmentWhat does 'attach costs' mean?

How can a ban from entering the US be lifted?

Convert integer to full text string duration

What causes a fastener to lock?

Can you take the Dodge action while prone?

Sci-fi book (no magic, hyperspace jumps, blind protagonist)

Way to see all encrypted fields in Salesforce?

Is there a standard definition of the "stall" phenomena?

How important is it for multiple POVs to run chronologically?

How did the IEC decide to create kibibytes?

Sleepy tired vs physically tired

How to supply water to a coastal desert town with no rain and no freshwater aquifers?

Was I wrongfully denied boarding for having a Schengen visa issued from the second country on my itinerary?

Why do we need a bootloader separate from our application program in microcontrollers?

How frequently do Russian people still refer to others by their patronymic (отчество)?

Should I cheat if the majority does it?

Isn't "Dave's protocol" good if only the database, and not the code, is leaked?

Boss furious on bad appraisal

Is it possible to spoof an IP address to an exact number?

Are "confidant" and "confident" homophones?

Motorcyle Chain needs to be cleaned every time you lube it?

How to reclaim personal item I've lent to the office without burning bridges?

Bypass with wrong cvv of debit card and getting OTP

How would a sea turtle end up on its back?

Why do most airliners have underwing engines, while business jets have rear-mounted engines?



What does “in the course of” mean?


Big corporation in the UK, Intellectual Property and a ContractWhat can I do if I signed an excessively restrictive contract?Does a non-disparagement clause in a settlement cover the oppositions attorney?What does payable in advance mean?Legality of absolving martial arts class of responsibility if injury or death occurs?Job Contract Copyright WaiverLegal syntax question in the Canadian Copyright ActInventions Assignment Agreement in CaliforniaAssignment of Inventions in Employment Contract for Software DevelopmentWhat does 'attach costs' mean?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2















I'm trying to decipher the Proprietary Rights section of a contract I've been asked to sign. Does "in the course of providing services" mean "during the same time as providing services" or "for the purpose of providing services" or something else?



I ask because I am a programmer who will be working on my own project during the same period as I am providing services to this Client, but after-hours and not for the same purpose or business. I want to make sure that what I create for myself I will own.



The full section states:




Any and all inventions, discoveries, improvements, software, intellectual property and other works of authorship or creations (collectively "Creations") which the Contractor or Contractor's Agents have conceived or made or may conceive or make in the course of providing Services that are related to or connected with Client's business activities shall be the sole and exclusive property of such Client.











share|improve this question









New contributor



adam0101 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    2















    I'm trying to decipher the Proprietary Rights section of a contract I've been asked to sign. Does "in the course of providing services" mean "during the same time as providing services" or "for the purpose of providing services" or something else?



    I ask because I am a programmer who will be working on my own project during the same period as I am providing services to this Client, but after-hours and not for the same purpose or business. I want to make sure that what I create for myself I will own.



    The full section states:




    Any and all inventions, discoveries, improvements, software, intellectual property and other works of authorship or creations (collectively "Creations") which the Contractor or Contractor's Agents have conceived or made or may conceive or make in the course of providing Services that are related to or connected with Client's business activities shall be the sole and exclusive property of such Client.











    share|improve this question









    New contributor



    adam0101 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





















      2












      2








      2








      I'm trying to decipher the Proprietary Rights section of a contract I've been asked to sign. Does "in the course of providing services" mean "during the same time as providing services" or "for the purpose of providing services" or something else?



      I ask because I am a programmer who will be working on my own project during the same period as I am providing services to this Client, but after-hours and not for the same purpose or business. I want to make sure that what I create for myself I will own.



      The full section states:




      Any and all inventions, discoveries, improvements, software, intellectual property and other works of authorship or creations (collectively "Creations") which the Contractor or Contractor's Agents have conceived or made or may conceive or make in the course of providing Services that are related to or connected with Client's business activities shall be the sole and exclusive property of such Client.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor



      adam0101 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      I'm trying to decipher the Proprietary Rights section of a contract I've been asked to sign. Does "in the course of providing services" mean "during the same time as providing services" or "for the purpose of providing services" or something else?



      I ask because I am a programmer who will be working on my own project during the same period as I am providing services to this Client, but after-hours and not for the same purpose or business. I want to make sure that what I create for myself I will own.



      The full section states:




      Any and all inventions, discoveries, improvements, software, intellectual property and other works of authorship or creations (collectively "Creations") which the Contractor or Contractor's Agents have conceived or made or may conceive or make in the course of providing Services that are related to or connected with Client's business activities shall be the sole and exclusive property of such Client.








      contract-law contract legal-terms






      share|improve this question









      New contributor



      adam0101 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.










      share|improve this question









      New contributor



      adam0101 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 1 hour ago







      adam0101













      New contributor



      adam0101 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      asked 8 hours ago









      adam0101adam0101

      1135 bronze badges




      1135 bronze badges




      New contributor



      adam0101 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




      New contributor




      adam0101 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3















          Does "in the course of providing services" mean "during the same time
          as providing services" or "for the purpose of providing services" or
          something else?



          I ask because I am a programmer who will be working on my own project
          during the same period as I am providing services to this Client, but
          after-hours and not for the same purpose or business. I want to make
          sure that what I create for myself I will own.




          The best definitions that come to mind off the cuff are "related to" and "in connection with", and both of those phrases appear in the same sentence, so that is quite close to the mark.



          Black's Law Dictionary (5th edition 1979) (from my har copy edition) defines "in the course of employment" as follows (citation omitted):




          The phase "in the course of" employment, as used in worker's
          compensation acts, related to time, place and circumstances under
          which accident occurred, and means injury happened while worker was at
          work in his or her employer's service.




          Dictionary.com defines "in the course of" as:




          during the course of. In the process or progress of




          The best definition I gleaned from relevant case law is as follows:




          [A]n invention made or conceived in performing, or as a
          result of performing, the work required by a contract is made or
          conceived "in the course of" that contract. That would be true even
          though the invention was not specifically sought in the terms of the
          contract. An invention is made or conceived "under" a contract when it
          is made or conceived during the life of the contract and the invention
          is, in whole or in part, specifically provided for by that contract.




          Fitch v. Atomic Energy Commn., 491 F.2d 1392, 1395 (Cust. & Pat. App. 1974).



          The law which forms the background against which the contract term in question is drafted is discussed in the following language from a Federal Circuit patent law case:




          The general rule is that an individual owns the patent rights to the
          subject matter of which he is an inventor, even though he conceived it
          or reduced it to practice in the course of his employment. There are
          two exceptions to this rule: first, an employer owns an employee's
          invention if the employee is a party to an express contract to that
          effect; second, where an employee is hired to invent something or
          solve a particular problem, the property of the invention related to
          this effort may belong to the employer. Both exceptions are firmly
          grounded in the principles of contract law that allow parties to
          freely structure their transactions and obtain the benefit of any
          bargains reached.




          Banks v. Unisys Corp., 228 F.3d 1357, 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2000).



          A similar contact is applied in the case Greene v. Ablon, 794 F.3d 133, 142 (1st Cir. 2015), but the term was not defined or disputed in that case. This case is still useful, however, for purposes of seeing the kind of issues that are typically raised in a case like this one and to assure yourself that the contract probably is enforceable.



          For the purposes of this question, the difference between an employee and an independent contractor is immaterial.






          share|improve this answer

























          • Thanks. If I understand you correctly, with the terms as-is, they would be able to gain the rights to anything that I work on during life of the contract. If I asked them to change the wording from "in the course of providing Services" to "for the purpose of providing Services", do you think that would be sufficient for me to preserve the rights to my own project?

            – adam0101
            7 hours ago












          • @adam0101 Hard to know.

            – ohwilleke
            2 hours ago











          • Thanks for your help. I got the contract revised to say "for the purpose of providing Services". I'm going to sign and hope that it's good enough. Still, even though it's hard to know, I'm curious what your best guess would be.

            – adam0101
            1 hour ago













          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "617"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );






          adam0101 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f42614%2fwhat-does-in-the-course-of-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3















          Does "in the course of providing services" mean "during the same time
          as providing services" or "for the purpose of providing services" or
          something else?



          I ask because I am a programmer who will be working on my own project
          during the same period as I am providing services to this Client, but
          after-hours and not for the same purpose or business. I want to make
          sure that what I create for myself I will own.




          The best definitions that come to mind off the cuff are "related to" and "in connection with", and both of those phrases appear in the same sentence, so that is quite close to the mark.



          Black's Law Dictionary (5th edition 1979) (from my har copy edition) defines "in the course of employment" as follows (citation omitted):




          The phase "in the course of" employment, as used in worker's
          compensation acts, related to time, place and circumstances under
          which accident occurred, and means injury happened while worker was at
          work in his or her employer's service.




          Dictionary.com defines "in the course of" as:




          during the course of. In the process or progress of




          The best definition I gleaned from relevant case law is as follows:




          [A]n invention made or conceived in performing, or as a
          result of performing, the work required by a contract is made or
          conceived "in the course of" that contract. That would be true even
          though the invention was not specifically sought in the terms of the
          contract. An invention is made or conceived "under" a contract when it
          is made or conceived during the life of the contract and the invention
          is, in whole or in part, specifically provided for by that contract.




          Fitch v. Atomic Energy Commn., 491 F.2d 1392, 1395 (Cust. & Pat. App. 1974).



          The law which forms the background against which the contract term in question is drafted is discussed in the following language from a Federal Circuit patent law case:




          The general rule is that an individual owns the patent rights to the
          subject matter of which he is an inventor, even though he conceived it
          or reduced it to practice in the course of his employment. There are
          two exceptions to this rule: first, an employer owns an employee's
          invention if the employee is a party to an express contract to that
          effect; second, where an employee is hired to invent something or
          solve a particular problem, the property of the invention related to
          this effort may belong to the employer. Both exceptions are firmly
          grounded in the principles of contract law that allow parties to
          freely structure their transactions and obtain the benefit of any
          bargains reached.




          Banks v. Unisys Corp., 228 F.3d 1357, 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2000).



          A similar contact is applied in the case Greene v. Ablon, 794 F.3d 133, 142 (1st Cir. 2015), but the term was not defined or disputed in that case. This case is still useful, however, for purposes of seeing the kind of issues that are typically raised in a case like this one and to assure yourself that the contract probably is enforceable.



          For the purposes of this question, the difference between an employee and an independent contractor is immaterial.






          share|improve this answer

























          • Thanks. If I understand you correctly, with the terms as-is, they would be able to gain the rights to anything that I work on during life of the contract. If I asked them to change the wording from "in the course of providing Services" to "for the purpose of providing Services", do you think that would be sufficient for me to preserve the rights to my own project?

            – adam0101
            7 hours ago












          • @adam0101 Hard to know.

            – ohwilleke
            2 hours ago











          • Thanks for your help. I got the contract revised to say "for the purpose of providing Services". I'm going to sign and hope that it's good enough. Still, even though it's hard to know, I'm curious what your best guess would be.

            – adam0101
            1 hour ago















          3















          Does "in the course of providing services" mean "during the same time
          as providing services" or "for the purpose of providing services" or
          something else?



          I ask because I am a programmer who will be working on my own project
          during the same period as I am providing services to this Client, but
          after-hours and not for the same purpose or business. I want to make
          sure that what I create for myself I will own.




          The best definitions that come to mind off the cuff are "related to" and "in connection with", and both of those phrases appear in the same sentence, so that is quite close to the mark.



          Black's Law Dictionary (5th edition 1979) (from my har copy edition) defines "in the course of employment" as follows (citation omitted):




          The phase "in the course of" employment, as used in worker's
          compensation acts, related to time, place and circumstances under
          which accident occurred, and means injury happened while worker was at
          work in his or her employer's service.




          Dictionary.com defines "in the course of" as:




          during the course of. In the process or progress of




          The best definition I gleaned from relevant case law is as follows:




          [A]n invention made or conceived in performing, or as a
          result of performing, the work required by a contract is made or
          conceived "in the course of" that contract. That would be true even
          though the invention was not specifically sought in the terms of the
          contract. An invention is made or conceived "under" a contract when it
          is made or conceived during the life of the contract and the invention
          is, in whole or in part, specifically provided for by that contract.




          Fitch v. Atomic Energy Commn., 491 F.2d 1392, 1395 (Cust. & Pat. App. 1974).



          The law which forms the background against which the contract term in question is drafted is discussed in the following language from a Federal Circuit patent law case:




          The general rule is that an individual owns the patent rights to the
          subject matter of which he is an inventor, even though he conceived it
          or reduced it to practice in the course of his employment. There are
          two exceptions to this rule: first, an employer owns an employee's
          invention if the employee is a party to an express contract to that
          effect; second, where an employee is hired to invent something or
          solve a particular problem, the property of the invention related to
          this effort may belong to the employer. Both exceptions are firmly
          grounded in the principles of contract law that allow parties to
          freely structure their transactions and obtain the benefit of any
          bargains reached.




          Banks v. Unisys Corp., 228 F.3d 1357, 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2000).



          A similar contact is applied in the case Greene v. Ablon, 794 F.3d 133, 142 (1st Cir. 2015), but the term was not defined or disputed in that case. This case is still useful, however, for purposes of seeing the kind of issues that are typically raised in a case like this one and to assure yourself that the contract probably is enforceable.



          For the purposes of this question, the difference between an employee and an independent contractor is immaterial.






          share|improve this answer

























          • Thanks. If I understand you correctly, with the terms as-is, they would be able to gain the rights to anything that I work on during life of the contract. If I asked them to change the wording from "in the course of providing Services" to "for the purpose of providing Services", do you think that would be sufficient for me to preserve the rights to my own project?

            – adam0101
            7 hours ago












          • @adam0101 Hard to know.

            – ohwilleke
            2 hours ago











          • Thanks for your help. I got the contract revised to say "for the purpose of providing Services". I'm going to sign and hope that it's good enough. Still, even though it's hard to know, I'm curious what your best guess would be.

            – adam0101
            1 hour ago













          3












          3








          3








          Does "in the course of providing services" mean "during the same time
          as providing services" or "for the purpose of providing services" or
          something else?



          I ask because I am a programmer who will be working on my own project
          during the same period as I am providing services to this Client, but
          after-hours and not for the same purpose or business. I want to make
          sure that what I create for myself I will own.




          The best definitions that come to mind off the cuff are "related to" and "in connection with", and both of those phrases appear in the same sentence, so that is quite close to the mark.



          Black's Law Dictionary (5th edition 1979) (from my har copy edition) defines "in the course of employment" as follows (citation omitted):




          The phase "in the course of" employment, as used in worker's
          compensation acts, related to time, place and circumstances under
          which accident occurred, and means injury happened while worker was at
          work in his or her employer's service.




          Dictionary.com defines "in the course of" as:




          during the course of. In the process or progress of




          The best definition I gleaned from relevant case law is as follows:




          [A]n invention made or conceived in performing, or as a
          result of performing, the work required by a contract is made or
          conceived "in the course of" that contract. That would be true even
          though the invention was not specifically sought in the terms of the
          contract. An invention is made or conceived "under" a contract when it
          is made or conceived during the life of the contract and the invention
          is, in whole or in part, specifically provided for by that contract.




          Fitch v. Atomic Energy Commn., 491 F.2d 1392, 1395 (Cust. & Pat. App. 1974).



          The law which forms the background against which the contract term in question is drafted is discussed in the following language from a Federal Circuit patent law case:




          The general rule is that an individual owns the patent rights to the
          subject matter of which he is an inventor, even though he conceived it
          or reduced it to practice in the course of his employment. There are
          two exceptions to this rule: first, an employer owns an employee's
          invention if the employee is a party to an express contract to that
          effect; second, where an employee is hired to invent something or
          solve a particular problem, the property of the invention related to
          this effort may belong to the employer. Both exceptions are firmly
          grounded in the principles of contract law that allow parties to
          freely structure their transactions and obtain the benefit of any
          bargains reached.




          Banks v. Unisys Corp., 228 F.3d 1357, 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2000).



          A similar contact is applied in the case Greene v. Ablon, 794 F.3d 133, 142 (1st Cir. 2015), but the term was not defined or disputed in that case. This case is still useful, however, for purposes of seeing the kind of issues that are typically raised in a case like this one and to assure yourself that the contract probably is enforceable.



          For the purposes of this question, the difference between an employee and an independent contractor is immaterial.






          share|improve this answer
















          Does "in the course of providing services" mean "during the same time
          as providing services" or "for the purpose of providing services" or
          something else?



          I ask because I am a programmer who will be working on my own project
          during the same period as I am providing services to this Client, but
          after-hours and not for the same purpose or business. I want to make
          sure that what I create for myself I will own.




          The best definitions that come to mind off the cuff are "related to" and "in connection with", and both of those phrases appear in the same sentence, so that is quite close to the mark.



          Black's Law Dictionary (5th edition 1979) (from my har copy edition) defines "in the course of employment" as follows (citation omitted):




          The phase "in the course of" employment, as used in worker's
          compensation acts, related to time, place and circumstances under
          which accident occurred, and means injury happened while worker was at
          work in his or her employer's service.




          Dictionary.com defines "in the course of" as:




          during the course of. In the process or progress of




          The best definition I gleaned from relevant case law is as follows:




          [A]n invention made or conceived in performing, or as a
          result of performing, the work required by a contract is made or
          conceived "in the course of" that contract. That would be true even
          though the invention was not specifically sought in the terms of the
          contract. An invention is made or conceived "under" a contract when it
          is made or conceived during the life of the contract and the invention
          is, in whole or in part, specifically provided for by that contract.




          Fitch v. Atomic Energy Commn., 491 F.2d 1392, 1395 (Cust. & Pat. App. 1974).



          The law which forms the background against which the contract term in question is drafted is discussed in the following language from a Federal Circuit patent law case:




          The general rule is that an individual owns the patent rights to the
          subject matter of which he is an inventor, even though he conceived it
          or reduced it to practice in the course of his employment. There are
          two exceptions to this rule: first, an employer owns an employee's
          invention if the employee is a party to an express contract to that
          effect; second, where an employee is hired to invent something or
          solve a particular problem, the property of the invention related to
          this effort may belong to the employer. Both exceptions are firmly
          grounded in the principles of contract law that allow parties to
          freely structure their transactions and obtain the benefit of any
          bargains reached.




          Banks v. Unisys Corp., 228 F.3d 1357, 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2000).



          A similar contact is applied in the case Greene v. Ablon, 794 F.3d 133, 142 (1st Cir. 2015), but the term was not defined or disputed in that case. This case is still useful, however, for purposes of seeing the kind of issues that are typically raised in a case like this one and to assure yourself that the contract probably is enforceable.



          For the purposes of this question, the difference between an employee and an independent contractor is immaterial.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 7 hours ago

























          answered 7 hours ago









          ohwillekeohwilleke

          56.5k2 gold badges66 silver badges146 bronze badges




          56.5k2 gold badges66 silver badges146 bronze badges












          • Thanks. If I understand you correctly, with the terms as-is, they would be able to gain the rights to anything that I work on during life of the contract. If I asked them to change the wording from "in the course of providing Services" to "for the purpose of providing Services", do you think that would be sufficient for me to preserve the rights to my own project?

            – adam0101
            7 hours ago












          • @adam0101 Hard to know.

            – ohwilleke
            2 hours ago











          • Thanks for your help. I got the contract revised to say "for the purpose of providing Services". I'm going to sign and hope that it's good enough. Still, even though it's hard to know, I'm curious what your best guess would be.

            – adam0101
            1 hour ago

















          • Thanks. If I understand you correctly, with the terms as-is, they would be able to gain the rights to anything that I work on during life of the contract. If I asked them to change the wording from "in the course of providing Services" to "for the purpose of providing Services", do you think that would be sufficient for me to preserve the rights to my own project?

            – adam0101
            7 hours ago












          • @adam0101 Hard to know.

            – ohwilleke
            2 hours ago











          • Thanks for your help. I got the contract revised to say "for the purpose of providing Services". I'm going to sign and hope that it's good enough. Still, even though it's hard to know, I'm curious what your best guess would be.

            – adam0101
            1 hour ago
















          Thanks. If I understand you correctly, with the terms as-is, they would be able to gain the rights to anything that I work on during life of the contract. If I asked them to change the wording from "in the course of providing Services" to "for the purpose of providing Services", do you think that would be sufficient for me to preserve the rights to my own project?

          – adam0101
          7 hours ago






          Thanks. If I understand you correctly, with the terms as-is, they would be able to gain the rights to anything that I work on during life of the contract. If I asked them to change the wording from "in the course of providing Services" to "for the purpose of providing Services", do you think that would be sufficient for me to preserve the rights to my own project?

          – adam0101
          7 hours ago














          @adam0101 Hard to know.

          – ohwilleke
          2 hours ago





          @adam0101 Hard to know.

          – ohwilleke
          2 hours ago













          Thanks for your help. I got the contract revised to say "for the purpose of providing Services". I'm going to sign and hope that it's good enough. Still, even though it's hard to know, I'm curious what your best guess would be.

          – adam0101
          1 hour ago





          Thanks for your help. I got the contract revised to say "for the purpose of providing Services". I'm going to sign and hope that it's good enough. Still, even though it's hard to know, I'm curious what your best guess would be.

          – adam0101
          1 hour ago










          adam0101 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          adam0101 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          adam0101 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











          adam0101 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














          Thanks for contributing an answer to Law Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f42614%2fwhat-does-in-the-course-of-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

          Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

          199年 目錄 大件事 到箇年出世嗰人 到箇年死嗰人 節慶、風俗習慣 導覽選單