Lie bracket of vector fields in Penrose's abstract index notationWhich tensor fields on a symplectic manifold are invariant under all Hamiltonian vector fields?Lie group actions and f-relatednessIs there much theory of superalgebras acting on manifolds by alternating polyvector fields?Lie bracket of Invariant Vector fields Splitting of the double tangent bundle into vertical and horizontal parts, and defining partial derivativesNormalized Hamiltonian holomorphic vector fields on Sasakian manifoldsDoes for every vector field there always exist a volume form for which the vector field is a homothety?Properties of connection Laplacian on vector fieldsFunctoriality of the formality quasi-isomorphism of E-polydifferential operatorsNotation and geometry facts in a paper on the Diederich-Fornæss index

Lie bracket of vector fields in Penrose's abstract index notation


Which tensor fields on a symplectic manifold are invariant under all Hamiltonian vector fields?Lie group actions and f-relatednessIs there much theory of superalgebras acting on manifolds by alternating polyvector fields?Lie bracket of Invariant Vector fields Splitting of the double tangent bundle into vertical and horizontal parts, and defining partial derivativesNormalized Hamiltonian holomorphic vector fields on Sasakian manifoldsDoes for every vector field there always exist a volume form for which the vector field is a homothety?Properties of connection Laplacian on vector fieldsFunctoriality of the formality quasi-isomorphism of E-polydifferential operatorsNotation and geometry facts in a paper on the Diederich-Fornæss index













2












$begingroup$


In the abstract index notation of Penrose, indicies serve as placeholders to indicate the type of a tensor field. For example, $X^i$ denotes a vector field. What is the commonly accepted notation for the Lie bracket of two vector fields $X^i$ and $Y^j$?
Clearly, $[X^i, Y^j]^k$ does not work, because this would denote a $3$-contravariant tensor. Something like $[ cdot, cdot]_ij^ k X^i Y^j$ would work but looks strange.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$


    In the abstract index notation of Penrose, indicies serve as placeholders to indicate the type of a tensor field. For example, $X^i$ denotes a vector field. What is the commonly accepted notation for the Lie bracket of two vector fields $X^i$ and $Y^j$?
    Clearly, $[X^i, Y^j]^k$ does not work, because this would denote a $3$-contravariant tensor. Something like $[ cdot, cdot]_ij^ k X^i Y^j$ would work but looks strange.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      In the abstract index notation of Penrose, indicies serve as placeholders to indicate the type of a tensor field. For example, $X^i$ denotes a vector field. What is the commonly accepted notation for the Lie bracket of two vector fields $X^i$ and $Y^j$?
      Clearly, $[X^i, Y^j]^k$ does not work, because this would denote a $3$-contravariant tensor. Something like $[ cdot, cdot]_ij^ k X^i Y^j$ would work but looks strange.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      In the abstract index notation of Penrose, indicies serve as placeholders to indicate the type of a tensor field. For example, $X^i$ denotes a vector field. What is the commonly accepted notation for the Lie bracket of two vector fields $X^i$ and $Y^j$?
      Clearly, $[X^i, Y^j]^k$ does not work, because this would denote a $3$-contravariant tensor. Something like $[ cdot, cdot]_ij^ k X^i Y^j$ would work but looks strange.







      dg.differential-geometry






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 11 hours ago









      Tobias DiezTobias Diez

      2,75813 silver badges34 bronze badges




      2,75813 silver badges34 bronze badges




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          7












          $begingroup$

          Penrose-Rindler write it $X^inabla_iY^j-Y^inabla_iX^j$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




















            1












            $begingroup$

            I think it is standard in the mathematical physics literature to write this as $[X,Y]^k$. The entire expression "$[X,Y]$" is a new vector and $k$ is its index.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$















              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "504"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f335367%2flie-bracket-of-vector-fields-in-penroses-abstract-index-notation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              7












              $begingroup$

              Penrose-Rindler write it $X^inabla_iY^j-Y^inabla_iX^j$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                7












                $begingroup$

                Penrose-Rindler write it $X^inabla_iY^j-Y^inabla_iX^j$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  7












                  7








                  7





                  $begingroup$

                  Penrose-Rindler write it $X^inabla_iY^j-Y^inabla_iX^j$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Penrose-Rindler write it $X^inabla_iY^j-Y^inabla_iX^j$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 10 hours ago









                  Francois ZieglerFrancois Ziegler

                  21.2k3 gold badges78 silver badges124 bronze badges




                  21.2k3 gold badges78 silver badges124 bronze badges





















                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      I think it is standard in the mathematical physics literature to write this as $[X,Y]^k$. The entire expression "$[X,Y]$" is a new vector and $k$ is its index.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$

















                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        I think it is standard in the mathematical physics literature to write this as $[X,Y]^k$. The entire expression "$[X,Y]$" is a new vector and $k$ is its index.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$















                          1












                          1








                          1





                          $begingroup$

                          I think it is standard in the mathematical physics literature to write this as $[X,Y]^k$. The entire expression "$[X,Y]$" is a new vector and $k$ is its index.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          I think it is standard in the mathematical physics literature to write this as $[X,Y]^k$. The entire expression "$[X,Y]$" is a new vector and $k$ is its index.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered 9 hours ago









                          WillRWillR

                          334 bronze badges




                          334 bronze badges



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f335367%2flie-bracket-of-vector-fields-in-penroses-abstract-index-notation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                              Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                              Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її