What happens when one target of Paradoxical Outcome becomes illegal?What happens if Genesis Wave puts Fists of Ironwood onto a battlefield with no creatures?What happens if the target of equipping dies?What happens when I remove Mistbind Clique with its champion trigger still on the stack?Can an illegal target that will become a legal target before the spell resolves be targeted?What happens if a target for removal becomes ineligible after a card has been cast?What happens if I become an illegal target of Cruel Entertainment?What happens if Merfolk Trickster taps Emmara?What happens when a reanimated creature returns from exile?What happens to spells on the stack when a player leaves the game?Radiate and shelter

Harley Davidson clattering noise from engine, backfire and failure to start

Why does there seem to be an extreme lack of public trashcans in Taiwan?

What publication claimed that Michael Jackson died in a nuclear holocaust?

Is all-caps blackletter no longer taboo?

Optimising matrix generation time

What's the reason for the decade jump in the recent X-Men trilogy?

Interview was just a one hour panel. Got an offer the next day; do I accept or is this a red flag?

Why can't we feel the Earth's revolution?

Difference between grep -R and -r

New Site Design!

Dedicated bike GPS computer over smartphone

In The Incredibles 2, why does Screenslaver's name use a pun on something that doesn't exist in the 1950s pastiche?

Nth term of Van Eck Sequence

What did the 8086 (and 8088) do upon encountering an illegal instruction?

Someone who is granted access to information but not expected to read it

How to turn a table by 90° and split variables in two or more lines

ISP is not hashing the password I log in with online. Should I take any action?

Jam with honey & without pectin has a saucy consistency always

Must a CPU have a GPU if the motherboard provides a display port (when there isn't any separate video card)?

Opposite of "Concerto Grosso"?

Can I get a photo of an Ancient Arrow?

SFDX force:org:clone not working

Boss making me feel guilty for leaving the company at the end of my internship

Realistic, logical way for men with medieval-era weaponry to compete with much larger and physically stronger foes



What happens when one target of Paradoxical Outcome becomes illegal?


What happens if Genesis Wave puts Fists of Ironwood onto a battlefield with no creatures?What happens if the target of equipping dies?What happens when I remove Mistbind Clique with its champion trigger still on the stack?Can an illegal target that will become a legal target before the spell resolves be targeted?What happens if a target for removal becomes ineligible after a card has been cast?What happens if I become an illegal target of Cruel Entertainment?What happens if Merfolk Trickster taps Emmara?What happens when a reanimated creature returns from exile?What happens to spells on the stack when a player leaves the game?Radiate and shelter













2















What happens when one target of Paradoxical Outcome becomes leaves the battlefield while Paradoxical Outcome is on the stack? Does it fizzle?










share|improve this question




























    2















    What happens when one target of Paradoxical Outcome becomes leaves the battlefield while Paradoxical Outcome is on the stack? Does it fizzle?










    share|improve this question


























      2












      2








      2








      What happens when one target of Paradoxical Outcome becomes leaves the battlefield while Paradoxical Outcome is on the stack? Does it fizzle?










      share|improve this question
















      What happens when one target of Paradoxical Outcome becomes leaves the battlefield while Paradoxical Outcome is on the stack? Does it fizzle?







      magic-the-gathering






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 8 hours ago









      Glorfindel

      9,82113563




      9,82113563










      asked 8 hours ago









      ChristianChristian

      270210




      270210




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          A spell only fizzles if all targets become invalid before resolution. The spell will resolve on the remaining targets, and a card drawn for each card actually returned to your hand.




          608.2b If the spell or ability specifies targets, it checks whether the targets are still legal. A target that’s no longer in the zone it was in when it was targeted is illegal. Other changes to the game state may cause a target to no longer be legal; for example, its characteristics may have changed or an effect may have changed the text of the spell. If the source of an ability has left the zone it was in, its last known information is used during this process. If all its targets, for every instance of the word “target,” are now illegal, the spell or ability doesn’t resolve. It’s removed from the stack and, if it’s a spell, put into its owner’s graveyard. Otherwise, the spell or ability will resolve normally. Illegal targets, if any, won’t be affected by parts of a resolving spell’s effect for which they’re illegal. Other parts of the effect for which those targets are not illegal may still affect them. If the spell or ability creates any continuous effects that affect game rules (see rule 613.10), those effects don’t apply to illegal targets. If part of the effect requires information about an illegal target, it fails to determine any such information. Any part of the effect that requires that information won’t happen.







          share|improve this answer






























            2














            Paradoxical Outcome will not resolve (i.e. 'fizzle', though that term does not appear in the rulebooks) if you target only one permanent and that leaves the battlefield before it resolves. Otherwise, if there are any legal targets left, all of these will still be returned to their owners' hands and you'll draw some cards (one for each of those permanents you own).




            608.2b If the spell or ability specifies targets, it checks whether the targets are still legal. A target that’s no longer in the zone it was in when it was targeted is illegal. Other changes to the game state may cause a target to no longer be legal; for example, its characteristics may have changed or an effect may have changed the text of the spell. If the source of an ability has left the zone it was in, its last known information is used during this process. If all its targets, for every instance of the word “target,” are now illegal, the spell or ability doesn’t resolve. It’s removed from the stack and, if it’s a spell, put into its owner’s graveyard. Otherwise, the spell or ability will resolve normally. Illegal targets, if any, won’t be affected by parts of a resolving spell’s effect for which they’re illegal. Other parts of the effect for which those targets are not illegal may still affect them. If the spell or ability creates any continuous effects that affect game rules (see rule 613.10), those effects don’t apply to illegal targets. If part of the effect requires information about an illegal target, it fails to determine any such information. Any part of the effect that requires that information won’t happen.




            (emphasis mine)



            The next step in spell resolution is




            608.2c The controller of the spell or ability follows its instructions in the order written.




            which will happen if it still has legal targets.






            share|improve this answer

























            • Although the word "fizzle" doesn't appear in the rules, it is simply a common shorthand for the bold sentence of 608.2b. So your first sentence is somewhat misleading (or at least ambiguous, it implies that fizzling isn't actually a rule, as opposed to the fact that the fizzle rule doesn't actually go by that name in the rules).

              – GendoIkari
              8 hours ago











            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "147"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fboardgames.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f47541%2fwhat-happens-when-one-target-of-paradoxical-outcome-becomes-illegal%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4














            A spell only fizzles if all targets become invalid before resolution. The spell will resolve on the remaining targets, and a card drawn for each card actually returned to your hand.




            608.2b If the spell or ability specifies targets, it checks whether the targets are still legal. A target that’s no longer in the zone it was in when it was targeted is illegal. Other changes to the game state may cause a target to no longer be legal; for example, its characteristics may have changed or an effect may have changed the text of the spell. If the source of an ability has left the zone it was in, its last known information is used during this process. If all its targets, for every instance of the word “target,” are now illegal, the spell or ability doesn’t resolve. It’s removed from the stack and, if it’s a spell, put into its owner’s graveyard. Otherwise, the spell or ability will resolve normally. Illegal targets, if any, won’t be affected by parts of a resolving spell’s effect for which they’re illegal. Other parts of the effect for which those targets are not illegal may still affect them. If the spell or ability creates any continuous effects that affect game rules (see rule 613.10), those effects don’t apply to illegal targets. If part of the effect requires information about an illegal target, it fails to determine any such information. Any part of the effect that requires that information won’t happen.







            share|improve this answer



























              4














              A spell only fizzles if all targets become invalid before resolution. The spell will resolve on the remaining targets, and a card drawn for each card actually returned to your hand.




              608.2b If the spell or ability specifies targets, it checks whether the targets are still legal. A target that’s no longer in the zone it was in when it was targeted is illegal. Other changes to the game state may cause a target to no longer be legal; for example, its characteristics may have changed or an effect may have changed the text of the spell. If the source of an ability has left the zone it was in, its last known information is used during this process. If all its targets, for every instance of the word “target,” are now illegal, the spell or ability doesn’t resolve. It’s removed from the stack and, if it’s a spell, put into its owner’s graveyard. Otherwise, the spell or ability will resolve normally. Illegal targets, if any, won’t be affected by parts of a resolving spell’s effect for which they’re illegal. Other parts of the effect for which those targets are not illegal may still affect them. If the spell or ability creates any continuous effects that affect game rules (see rule 613.10), those effects don’t apply to illegal targets. If part of the effect requires information about an illegal target, it fails to determine any such information. Any part of the effect that requires that information won’t happen.







              share|improve this answer

























                4












                4








                4







                A spell only fizzles if all targets become invalid before resolution. The spell will resolve on the remaining targets, and a card drawn for each card actually returned to your hand.




                608.2b If the spell or ability specifies targets, it checks whether the targets are still legal. A target that’s no longer in the zone it was in when it was targeted is illegal. Other changes to the game state may cause a target to no longer be legal; for example, its characteristics may have changed or an effect may have changed the text of the spell. If the source of an ability has left the zone it was in, its last known information is used during this process. If all its targets, for every instance of the word “target,” are now illegal, the spell or ability doesn’t resolve. It’s removed from the stack and, if it’s a spell, put into its owner’s graveyard. Otherwise, the spell or ability will resolve normally. Illegal targets, if any, won’t be affected by parts of a resolving spell’s effect for which they’re illegal. Other parts of the effect for which those targets are not illegal may still affect them. If the spell or ability creates any continuous effects that affect game rules (see rule 613.10), those effects don’t apply to illegal targets. If part of the effect requires information about an illegal target, it fails to determine any such information. Any part of the effect that requires that information won’t happen.







                share|improve this answer













                A spell only fizzles if all targets become invalid before resolution. The spell will resolve on the remaining targets, and a card drawn for each card actually returned to your hand.




                608.2b If the spell or ability specifies targets, it checks whether the targets are still legal. A target that’s no longer in the zone it was in when it was targeted is illegal. Other changes to the game state may cause a target to no longer be legal; for example, its characteristics may have changed or an effect may have changed the text of the spell. If the source of an ability has left the zone it was in, its last known information is used during this process. If all its targets, for every instance of the word “target,” are now illegal, the spell or ability doesn’t resolve. It’s removed from the stack and, if it’s a spell, put into its owner’s graveyard. Otherwise, the spell or ability will resolve normally. Illegal targets, if any, won’t be affected by parts of a resolving spell’s effect for which they’re illegal. Other parts of the effect for which those targets are not illegal may still affect them. If the spell or ability creates any continuous effects that affect game rules (see rule 613.10), those effects don’t apply to illegal targets. If part of the effect requires information about an illegal target, it fails to determine any such information. Any part of the effect that requires that information won’t happen.








                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 8 hours ago









                NickNick

                4,4191831




                4,4191831





















                    2














                    Paradoxical Outcome will not resolve (i.e. 'fizzle', though that term does not appear in the rulebooks) if you target only one permanent and that leaves the battlefield before it resolves. Otherwise, if there are any legal targets left, all of these will still be returned to their owners' hands and you'll draw some cards (one for each of those permanents you own).




                    608.2b If the spell or ability specifies targets, it checks whether the targets are still legal. A target that’s no longer in the zone it was in when it was targeted is illegal. Other changes to the game state may cause a target to no longer be legal; for example, its characteristics may have changed or an effect may have changed the text of the spell. If the source of an ability has left the zone it was in, its last known information is used during this process. If all its targets, for every instance of the word “target,” are now illegal, the spell or ability doesn’t resolve. It’s removed from the stack and, if it’s a spell, put into its owner’s graveyard. Otherwise, the spell or ability will resolve normally. Illegal targets, if any, won’t be affected by parts of a resolving spell’s effect for which they’re illegal. Other parts of the effect for which those targets are not illegal may still affect them. If the spell or ability creates any continuous effects that affect game rules (see rule 613.10), those effects don’t apply to illegal targets. If part of the effect requires information about an illegal target, it fails to determine any such information. Any part of the effect that requires that information won’t happen.




                    (emphasis mine)



                    The next step in spell resolution is




                    608.2c The controller of the spell or ability follows its instructions in the order written.




                    which will happen if it still has legal targets.






                    share|improve this answer

























                    • Although the word "fizzle" doesn't appear in the rules, it is simply a common shorthand for the bold sentence of 608.2b. So your first sentence is somewhat misleading (or at least ambiguous, it implies that fizzling isn't actually a rule, as opposed to the fact that the fizzle rule doesn't actually go by that name in the rules).

                      – GendoIkari
                      8 hours ago















                    2














                    Paradoxical Outcome will not resolve (i.e. 'fizzle', though that term does not appear in the rulebooks) if you target only one permanent and that leaves the battlefield before it resolves. Otherwise, if there are any legal targets left, all of these will still be returned to their owners' hands and you'll draw some cards (one for each of those permanents you own).




                    608.2b If the spell or ability specifies targets, it checks whether the targets are still legal. A target that’s no longer in the zone it was in when it was targeted is illegal. Other changes to the game state may cause a target to no longer be legal; for example, its characteristics may have changed or an effect may have changed the text of the spell. If the source of an ability has left the zone it was in, its last known information is used during this process. If all its targets, for every instance of the word “target,” are now illegal, the spell or ability doesn’t resolve. It’s removed from the stack and, if it’s a spell, put into its owner’s graveyard. Otherwise, the spell or ability will resolve normally. Illegal targets, if any, won’t be affected by parts of a resolving spell’s effect for which they’re illegal. Other parts of the effect for which those targets are not illegal may still affect them. If the spell or ability creates any continuous effects that affect game rules (see rule 613.10), those effects don’t apply to illegal targets. If part of the effect requires information about an illegal target, it fails to determine any such information. Any part of the effect that requires that information won’t happen.




                    (emphasis mine)



                    The next step in spell resolution is




                    608.2c The controller of the spell or ability follows its instructions in the order written.




                    which will happen if it still has legal targets.






                    share|improve this answer

























                    • Although the word "fizzle" doesn't appear in the rules, it is simply a common shorthand for the bold sentence of 608.2b. So your first sentence is somewhat misleading (or at least ambiguous, it implies that fizzling isn't actually a rule, as opposed to the fact that the fizzle rule doesn't actually go by that name in the rules).

                      – GendoIkari
                      8 hours ago













                    2












                    2








                    2







                    Paradoxical Outcome will not resolve (i.e. 'fizzle', though that term does not appear in the rulebooks) if you target only one permanent and that leaves the battlefield before it resolves. Otherwise, if there are any legal targets left, all of these will still be returned to their owners' hands and you'll draw some cards (one for each of those permanents you own).




                    608.2b If the spell or ability specifies targets, it checks whether the targets are still legal. A target that’s no longer in the zone it was in when it was targeted is illegal. Other changes to the game state may cause a target to no longer be legal; for example, its characteristics may have changed or an effect may have changed the text of the spell. If the source of an ability has left the zone it was in, its last known information is used during this process. If all its targets, for every instance of the word “target,” are now illegal, the spell or ability doesn’t resolve. It’s removed from the stack and, if it’s a spell, put into its owner’s graveyard. Otherwise, the spell or ability will resolve normally. Illegal targets, if any, won’t be affected by parts of a resolving spell’s effect for which they’re illegal. Other parts of the effect for which those targets are not illegal may still affect them. If the spell or ability creates any continuous effects that affect game rules (see rule 613.10), those effects don’t apply to illegal targets. If part of the effect requires information about an illegal target, it fails to determine any such information. Any part of the effect that requires that information won’t happen.




                    (emphasis mine)



                    The next step in spell resolution is




                    608.2c The controller of the spell or ability follows its instructions in the order written.




                    which will happen if it still has legal targets.






                    share|improve this answer















                    Paradoxical Outcome will not resolve (i.e. 'fizzle', though that term does not appear in the rulebooks) if you target only one permanent and that leaves the battlefield before it resolves. Otherwise, if there are any legal targets left, all of these will still be returned to their owners' hands and you'll draw some cards (one for each of those permanents you own).




                    608.2b If the spell or ability specifies targets, it checks whether the targets are still legal. A target that’s no longer in the zone it was in when it was targeted is illegal. Other changes to the game state may cause a target to no longer be legal; for example, its characteristics may have changed or an effect may have changed the text of the spell. If the source of an ability has left the zone it was in, its last known information is used during this process. If all its targets, for every instance of the word “target,” are now illegal, the spell or ability doesn’t resolve. It’s removed from the stack and, if it’s a spell, put into its owner’s graveyard. Otherwise, the spell or ability will resolve normally. Illegal targets, if any, won’t be affected by parts of a resolving spell’s effect for which they’re illegal. Other parts of the effect for which those targets are not illegal may still affect them. If the spell or ability creates any continuous effects that affect game rules (see rule 613.10), those effects don’t apply to illegal targets. If part of the effect requires information about an illegal target, it fails to determine any such information. Any part of the effect that requires that information won’t happen.




                    (emphasis mine)



                    The next step in spell resolution is




                    608.2c The controller of the spell or ability follows its instructions in the order written.




                    which will happen if it still has legal targets.







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited 8 hours ago

























                    answered 8 hours ago









                    GlorfindelGlorfindel

                    9,82113563




                    9,82113563












                    • Although the word "fizzle" doesn't appear in the rules, it is simply a common shorthand for the bold sentence of 608.2b. So your first sentence is somewhat misleading (or at least ambiguous, it implies that fizzling isn't actually a rule, as opposed to the fact that the fizzle rule doesn't actually go by that name in the rules).

                      – GendoIkari
                      8 hours ago

















                    • Although the word "fizzle" doesn't appear in the rules, it is simply a common shorthand for the bold sentence of 608.2b. So your first sentence is somewhat misleading (or at least ambiguous, it implies that fizzling isn't actually a rule, as opposed to the fact that the fizzle rule doesn't actually go by that name in the rules).

                      – GendoIkari
                      8 hours ago
















                    Although the word "fizzle" doesn't appear in the rules, it is simply a common shorthand for the bold sentence of 608.2b. So your first sentence is somewhat misleading (or at least ambiguous, it implies that fizzling isn't actually a rule, as opposed to the fact that the fizzle rule doesn't actually go by that name in the rules).

                    – GendoIkari
                    8 hours ago





                    Although the word "fizzle" doesn't appear in the rules, it is simply a common shorthand for the bold sentence of 608.2b. So your first sentence is somewhat misleading (or at least ambiguous, it implies that fizzling isn't actually a rule, as opposed to the fact that the fizzle rule doesn't actually go by that name in the rules).

                    – GendoIkari
                    8 hours ago

















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Board & Card Games Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fboardgames.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f47541%2fwhat-happens-when-one-target-of-paradoxical-outcome-becomes-illegal%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                    Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                    Tom Holland Mục lục Đầu đời và giáo dục | Sự nghiệp | Cuộc sống cá nhân | Phim tham gia | Giải thưởng và đề cử | Chú thích | Liên kết ngoài | Trình đơn chuyển hướngProfile“Person Details for Thomas Stanley Holland, "England and Wales Birth Registration Index, 1837-2008" — FamilySearch.org”"Meet Tom Holland... the 16-year-old star of The Impossible""Schoolboy actor Tom Holland finds himself in Oscar contention for role in tsunami drama"“Naomi Watts on the Prince William and Harry's reaction to her film about the late Princess Diana”lưu trữ"Holland and Pflueger Are West End's Two New 'Billy Elliots'""I'm so envious of my son, the movie star! British writer Dominic Holland's spent 20 years trying to crack Hollywood - but he's been beaten to it by a very unlikely rival"“Richard and Margaret Povey of Jersey, Channel Islands, UK: Information about Thomas Stanley Holland”"Tom Holland to play Billy Elliot""New Billy Elliot leaving the garage"Billy Elliot the Musical - Tom Holland - Billy"A Tale of four Billys: Tom Holland""The Feel Good Factor""Thames Christian College schoolboys join Myleene Klass for The Feelgood Factor""Government launches £600,000 arts bursaries pilot""BILLY's Chapman, Holland, Gardner & Jackson-Keen Visit Prime Minister""Elton John 'blown away' by Billy Elliot fifth birthday" (video with John's interview and fragments of Holland's performance)"First News interviews Arrietty's Tom Holland"“33rd Critics' Circle Film Awards winners”“National Board of Review Current Awards”Bản gốc"Ron Howard Whaling Tale 'In The Heart Of The Sea' Casts Tom Holland"“'Spider-Man' Finds Tom Holland to Star as New Web-Slinger”lưu trữ“Captain America: Civil War (2016)”“Film Review: ‘Captain America: Civil War’”lưu trữ“‘Captain America: Civil War’ review: Choose your own avenger”lưu trữ“The Lost City of Z reviews”“Sony Pictures and Marvel Studios Find Their 'Spider-Man' Star and Director”“‘Mary Magdalene’, ‘Current War’ & ‘Wind River’ Get 2017 Release Dates From Weinstein”“Lionsgate Unleashing Daisy Ridley & Tom Holland Starrer ‘Chaos Walking’ In Cannes”“PTA's 'Master' Leads Chicago Film Critics Nominations, UPDATED: Houston and Indiana Critics Nominations”“Nominaciones Goya 2013 Telecinco Cinema – ENG”“Jameson Empire Film Awards: Martin Freeman wins best actor for performance in The Hobbit”“34th Annual Young Artist Awards”Bản gốc“Teen Choice Awards 2016—Captain America: Civil War Leads Second Wave of Nominations”“BAFTA Film Award Nominations: ‘La La Land’ Leads Race”“Saturn Awards Nominations 2017: 'Rogue One,' 'Walking Dead' Lead”Tom HollandTom HollandTom HollandTom Hollandmedia.gettyimages.comWorldCat Identities300279794no20130442900000 0004 0355 42791085670554170004732cb16706349t(data)XX5557367