Why is the reciprocal used in fraction division?How to make sense of fractions?How do I rewrite -100+1/2 as the mixed number -99 1/2?Fraction exponents in divisionfraction division understandingFraction and Decimal: Reciprocal of x's non-integerWhy was I taught to convert “improper fractions” into mixed numbers?The division of a fraction - Whole or Part?division by fraction proofWhen dividing by a fraction, why can you not take the reciprocal of term involving addition/subtraction?How to tell when a fraction does not end?Basic division problem: dividing a fraction by a fraction
Way of refund if scammed?
VHDL: Why is it hard to design a floating point unit in hardware?
Surface of the 3x3x3 cube as a graph
Variable does not Exist: CaseTrigger
If change in free energy (G) is positive, how do those reactions still occur?
Efficient Algorithms for Destroyed Document Reconstruction
Is it OK to look at the list of played moves during the game to determine the status of the 50 move rule?
What is this dime sized black bug with white on the segments near Loveland Colorodao?
Is there an idiom that means that you are in a very strong negotiation position in a negotiation?
Keeping the dodos out of the field
Is the default 512 byte physical sector size appropriate for SSD disks under Linux?
Is it normal to "extract a paper" from a master thesis?
Why the work done is positive when bringing 2 opposite charges together?
Proto-Indo-European (PIE) words with IPA
Why do testers need root cause analysis?
What does it mean for something to be strictly less than epsilon for an arbitrary epsilon?
Writing "hahaha" versus describing the laugh
Existence of a model of ZFC in which the natural numbers are really the natural numbers
Is there a word for pant sleeves?
Department head said that group project may be rejected. How to mitigate?
Can someone get a spouse off a deed that never lived together and was incarcerated?
How many wires should be in a new thermostat cable?
Can diplomats be allowed on the flight deck of a commercial European airline?
Why is this integration method not valid?
Why is the reciprocal used in fraction division?
How to make sense of fractions?How do I rewrite -100+1/2 as the mixed number -99 1/2?Fraction exponents in divisionfraction division understandingFraction and Decimal: Reciprocal of x's non-integerWhy was I taught to convert “improper fractions” into mixed numbers?The division of a fraction - Whole or Part?division by fraction proofWhen dividing by a fraction, why can you not take the reciprocal of term involving addition/subtraction?How to tell when a fraction does not end?Basic division problem: dividing a fraction by a fraction
$begingroup$
I don't know if this is a basic question or whatever, but I can't seem to find an answer.
As far as I understand the reciprocal of a number the inverse of that number, that still doesn't clarify why it is needed.
For many years I've only ever done math like if I were a robot. I just did it and never understood what I was doing. So when I went and divided fractions I just used the reciprocal, because "that was the way to do it". I want to understand math at a deeper level, especially subjects like probability, statistics, calculus, and linear algebra. To do that I have to understand the fundamentals however.
Any response is appreciated.
fractions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I don't know if this is a basic question or whatever, but I can't seem to find an answer.
As far as I understand the reciprocal of a number the inverse of that number, that still doesn't clarify why it is needed.
For many years I've only ever done math like if I were a robot. I just did it and never understood what I was doing. So when I went and divided fractions I just used the reciprocal, because "that was the way to do it". I want to understand math at a deeper level, especially subjects like probability, statistics, calculus, and linear algebra. To do that I have to understand the fundamentals however.
Any response is appreciated.
fractions
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
To clarify, is your question regarding how reciprocal multiplication can be used to divide by any nonzero number, or specifically just in the case when you’re dividing by a fraction?
$endgroup$
– KronZ
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
This may be helpful. math.stackexchange.com/questions/1127483/…
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
If you are asking this question, it probably means that you do not have enough experience with algebra
$endgroup$
– rash
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Also see How to explain the flipping of division by a fraction? on Mathematics Educators, showcasing many attempts at an intuitive and elementary explanation.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I don't know if this is a basic question or whatever, but I can't seem to find an answer.
As far as I understand the reciprocal of a number the inverse of that number, that still doesn't clarify why it is needed.
For many years I've only ever done math like if I were a robot. I just did it and never understood what I was doing. So when I went and divided fractions I just used the reciprocal, because "that was the way to do it". I want to understand math at a deeper level, especially subjects like probability, statistics, calculus, and linear algebra. To do that I have to understand the fundamentals however.
Any response is appreciated.
fractions
$endgroup$
I don't know if this is a basic question or whatever, but I can't seem to find an answer.
As far as I understand the reciprocal of a number the inverse of that number, that still doesn't clarify why it is needed.
For many years I've only ever done math like if I were a robot. I just did it and never understood what I was doing. So when I went and divided fractions I just used the reciprocal, because "that was the way to do it". I want to understand math at a deeper level, especially subjects like probability, statistics, calculus, and linear algebra. To do that I have to understand the fundamentals however.
Any response is appreciated.
fractions
fractions
asked 2 hours ago
ArgusArgus
20418
20418
$begingroup$
To clarify, is your question regarding how reciprocal multiplication can be used to divide by any nonzero number, or specifically just in the case when you’re dividing by a fraction?
$endgroup$
– KronZ
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
This may be helpful. math.stackexchange.com/questions/1127483/…
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
If you are asking this question, it probably means that you do not have enough experience with algebra
$endgroup$
– rash
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Also see How to explain the flipping of division by a fraction? on Mathematics Educators, showcasing many attempts at an intuitive and elementary explanation.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To clarify, is your question regarding how reciprocal multiplication can be used to divide by any nonzero number, or specifically just in the case when you’re dividing by a fraction?
$endgroup$
– KronZ
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
This may be helpful. math.stackexchange.com/questions/1127483/…
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
If you are asking this question, it probably means that you do not have enough experience with algebra
$endgroup$
– rash
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Also see How to explain the flipping of division by a fraction? on Mathematics Educators, showcasing many attempts at an intuitive and elementary explanation.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
To clarify, is your question regarding how reciprocal multiplication can be used to divide by any nonzero number, or specifically just in the case when you’re dividing by a fraction?
$endgroup$
– KronZ
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
To clarify, is your question regarding how reciprocal multiplication can be used to divide by any nonzero number, or specifically just in the case when you’re dividing by a fraction?
$endgroup$
– KronZ
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
This may be helpful. math.stackexchange.com/questions/1127483/…
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
This may be helpful. math.stackexchange.com/questions/1127483/…
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
If you are asking this question, it probably means that you do not have enough experience with algebra
$endgroup$
– rash
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
If you are asking this question, it probably means that you do not have enough experience with algebra
$endgroup$
– rash
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Also see How to explain the flipping of division by a fraction? on Mathematics Educators, showcasing many attempts at an intuitive and elementary explanation.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Also see How to explain the flipping of division by a fraction? on Mathematics Educators, showcasing many attempts at an intuitive and elementary explanation.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
1 hour ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I think you're asking why the rule for division of fractions,
$$fracpq div fracrs = fracpq cdot fracsr,$$
works.
And I'm assuming that you're already comfortable with how to multiply fractions.
We need to go back to what division is supposed to achieve in the first place. When we look into that, the answer is that $Adiv B$ means something that gives $A$ when we multiply it by $B$ -- or, written in symbols, $Adiv B$ means the $X$ that solves the equation $$ Xcdot B = A $$
When our $A$ and $B$ are fraction, the "reciprocal" division rule can be regarded as a trick that happens to produce an $X$ that works. It's easy enough to see that it does work: If we're dividing $frac pq div frac rs$ we need to solve the equation
$$ X cdot frac rs = frac pq $$
And indeed setting $X=frac pqcdot frac sr = fracpsqr$ does this:
$$ fracpsqrcdotfrac rs = fracpscdot rqrcdot s = fracpcdot srqcdot sr = frac pq$$
like we want. (I'm also assuming that you're comfortable with cancelling the common factor $sr$ in the middle fraction).
This computation hopefully also gives some ides why it works, at least part way. In $fracpsqr$ the $p$ and $q$ are what we want to end up with, and the $s$ and $r$ are there to "neutralize" the $r$ and $s$ we have but want to discard. By making sure that the product has exactly one $r$ and one $s$ on each side of the fraction bar they make sure we can cancel them away.
Writing the solution $fracpsqr$ as $frac pqcdot frac sr$ might be best understood as just an easy way to remember what goes where. But this memory trick itself then also serves as motivation for considering the reciprocal to be an interesting operation in its own right in higher algebra.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your question isn't completely clear but what I understood is that you don't get why $$fracfracabfraccd= fracab*fracdc$$ the answer it's located in the axioms of the real numbers, a number $b$ it's the reciprocal of a number $d$ if $$ d*b=1$$ now, let's see the definition of fraction $$e/f=e*f^-1$$ with $f^-1$ the reciprocal of $f$, therefore $$fracfracabfraccd=fracab(fraccd)^-1$$ and since $$fraccd*fracdc=1$$ we have $$fracfracabfraccd= fracab*fracdc$$ our result
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3232527%2fwhy-is-the-reciprocal-used-in-fraction-division%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I think you're asking why the rule for division of fractions,
$$fracpq div fracrs = fracpq cdot fracsr,$$
works.
And I'm assuming that you're already comfortable with how to multiply fractions.
We need to go back to what division is supposed to achieve in the first place. When we look into that, the answer is that $Adiv B$ means something that gives $A$ when we multiply it by $B$ -- or, written in symbols, $Adiv B$ means the $X$ that solves the equation $$ Xcdot B = A $$
When our $A$ and $B$ are fraction, the "reciprocal" division rule can be regarded as a trick that happens to produce an $X$ that works. It's easy enough to see that it does work: If we're dividing $frac pq div frac rs$ we need to solve the equation
$$ X cdot frac rs = frac pq $$
And indeed setting $X=frac pqcdot frac sr = fracpsqr$ does this:
$$ fracpsqrcdotfrac rs = fracpscdot rqrcdot s = fracpcdot srqcdot sr = frac pq$$
like we want. (I'm also assuming that you're comfortable with cancelling the common factor $sr$ in the middle fraction).
This computation hopefully also gives some ides why it works, at least part way. In $fracpsqr$ the $p$ and $q$ are what we want to end up with, and the $s$ and $r$ are there to "neutralize" the $r$ and $s$ we have but want to discard. By making sure that the product has exactly one $r$ and one $s$ on each side of the fraction bar they make sure we can cancel them away.
Writing the solution $fracpsqr$ as $frac pqcdot frac sr$ might be best understood as just an easy way to remember what goes where. But this memory trick itself then also serves as motivation for considering the reciprocal to be an interesting operation in its own right in higher algebra.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think you're asking why the rule for division of fractions,
$$fracpq div fracrs = fracpq cdot fracsr,$$
works.
And I'm assuming that you're already comfortable with how to multiply fractions.
We need to go back to what division is supposed to achieve in the first place. When we look into that, the answer is that $Adiv B$ means something that gives $A$ when we multiply it by $B$ -- or, written in symbols, $Adiv B$ means the $X$ that solves the equation $$ Xcdot B = A $$
When our $A$ and $B$ are fraction, the "reciprocal" division rule can be regarded as a trick that happens to produce an $X$ that works. It's easy enough to see that it does work: If we're dividing $frac pq div frac rs$ we need to solve the equation
$$ X cdot frac rs = frac pq $$
And indeed setting $X=frac pqcdot frac sr = fracpsqr$ does this:
$$ fracpsqrcdotfrac rs = fracpscdot rqrcdot s = fracpcdot srqcdot sr = frac pq$$
like we want. (I'm also assuming that you're comfortable with cancelling the common factor $sr$ in the middle fraction).
This computation hopefully also gives some ides why it works, at least part way. In $fracpsqr$ the $p$ and $q$ are what we want to end up with, and the $s$ and $r$ are there to "neutralize" the $r$ and $s$ we have but want to discard. By making sure that the product has exactly one $r$ and one $s$ on each side of the fraction bar they make sure we can cancel them away.
Writing the solution $fracpsqr$ as $frac pqcdot frac sr$ might be best understood as just an easy way to remember what goes where. But this memory trick itself then also serves as motivation for considering the reciprocal to be an interesting operation in its own right in higher algebra.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think you're asking why the rule for division of fractions,
$$fracpq div fracrs = fracpq cdot fracsr,$$
works.
And I'm assuming that you're already comfortable with how to multiply fractions.
We need to go back to what division is supposed to achieve in the first place. When we look into that, the answer is that $Adiv B$ means something that gives $A$ when we multiply it by $B$ -- or, written in symbols, $Adiv B$ means the $X$ that solves the equation $$ Xcdot B = A $$
When our $A$ and $B$ are fraction, the "reciprocal" division rule can be regarded as a trick that happens to produce an $X$ that works. It's easy enough to see that it does work: If we're dividing $frac pq div frac rs$ we need to solve the equation
$$ X cdot frac rs = frac pq $$
And indeed setting $X=frac pqcdot frac sr = fracpsqr$ does this:
$$ fracpsqrcdotfrac rs = fracpscdot rqrcdot s = fracpcdot srqcdot sr = frac pq$$
like we want. (I'm also assuming that you're comfortable with cancelling the common factor $sr$ in the middle fraction).
This computation hopefully also gives some ides why it works, at least part way. In $fracpsqr$ the $p$ and $q$ are what we want to end up with, and the $s$ and $r$ are there to "neutralize" the $r$ and $s$ we have but want to discard. By making sure that the product has exactly one $r$ and one $s$ on each side of the fraction bar they make sure we can cancel them away.
Writing the solution $fracpsqr$ as $frac pqcdot frac sr$ might be best understood as just an easy way to remember what goes where. But this memory trick itself then also serves as motivation for considering the reciprocal to be an interesting operation in its own right in higher algebra.
$endgroup$
I think you're asking why the rule for division of fractions,
$$fracpq div fracrs = fracpq cdot fracsr,$$
works.
And I'm assuming that you're already comfortable with how to multiply fractions.
We need to go back to what division is supposed to achieve in the first place. When we look into that, the answer is that $Adiv B$ means something that gives $A$ when we multiply it by $B$ -- or, written in symbols, $Adiv B$ means the $X$ that solves the equation $$ Xcdot B = A $$
When our $A$ and $B$ are fraction, the "reciprocal" division rule can be regarded as a trick that happens to produce an $X$ that works. It's easy enough to see that it does work: If we're dividing $frac pq div frac rs$ we need to solve the equation
$$ X cdot frac rs = frac pq $$
And indeed setting $X=frac pqcdot frac sr = fracpsqr$ does this:
$$ fracpsqrcdotfrac rs = fracpscdot rqrcdot s = fracpcdot srqcdot sr = frac pq$$
like we want. (I'm also assuming that you're comfortable with cancelling the common factor $sr$ in the middle fraction).
This computation hopefully also gives some ides why it works, at least part way. In $fracpsqr$ the $p$ and $q$ are what we want to end up with, and the $s$ and $r$ are there to "neutralize" the $r$ and $s$ we have but want to discard. By making sure that the product has exactly one $r$ and one $s$ on each side of the fraction bar they make sure we can cancel them away.
Writing the solution $fracpsqr$ as $frac pqcdot frac sr$ might be best understood as just an easy way to remember what goes where. But this memory trick itself then also serves as motivation for considering the reciprocal to be an interesting operation in its own right in higher algebra.
edited 1 hour ago
answered 1 hour ago
Henning MakholmHenning Makholm
246k17316561
246k17316561
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your question isn't completely clear but what I understood is that you don't get why $$fracfracabfraccd= fracab*fracdc$$ the answer it's located in the axioms of the real numbers, a number $b$ it's the reciprocal of a number $d$ if $$ d*b=1$$ now, let's see the definition of fraction $$e/f=e*f^-1$$ with $f^-1$ the reciprocal of $f$, therefore $$fracfracabfraccd=fracab(fraccd)^-1$$ and since $$fraccd*fracdc=1$$ we have $$fracfracabfraccd= fracab*fracdc$$ our result
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your question isn't completely clear but what I understood is that you don't get why $$fracfracabfraccd= fracab*fracdc$$ the answer it's located in the axioms of the real numbers, a number $b$ it's the reciprocal of a number $d$ if $$ d*b=1$$ now, let's see the definition of fraction $$e/f=e*f^-1$$ with $f^-1$ the reciprocal of $f$, therefore $$fracfracabfraccd=fracab(fraccd)^-1$$ and since $$fraccd*fracdc=1$$ we have $$fracfracabfraccd= fracab*fracdc$$ our result
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your question isn't completely clear but what I understood is that you don't get why $$fracfracabfraccd= fracab*fracdc$$ the answer it's located in the axioms of the real numbers, a number $b$ it's the reciprocal of a number $d$ if $$ d*b=1$$ now, let's see the definition of fraction $$e/f=e*f^-1$$ with $f^-1$ the reciprocal of $f$, therefore $$fracfracabfraccd=fracab(fraccd)^-1$$ and since $$fraccd*fracdc=1$$ we have $$fracfracabfraccd= fracab*fracdc$$ our result
New contributor
$endgroup$
Your question isn't completely clear but what I understood is that you don't get why $$fracfracabfraccd= fracab*fracdc$$ the answer it's located in the axioms of the real numbers, a number $b$ it's the reciprocal of a number $d$ if $$ d*b=1$$ now, let's see the definition of fraction $$e/f=e*f^-1$$ with $f^-1$ the reciprocal of $f$, therefore $$fracfracabfraccd=fracab(fraccd)^-1$$ and since $$fraccd*fracdc=1$$ we have $$fracfracabfraccd= fracab*fracdc$$ our result
New contributor
New contributor
answered 1 hour ago
Mario AldeanMario Aldean
135
135
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3232527%2fwhy-is-the-reciprocal-used-in-fraction-division%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
To clarify, is your question regarding how reciprocal multiplication can be used to divide by any nonzero number, or specifically just in the case when you’re dividing by a fraction?
$endgroup$
– KronZ
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
This may be helpful. math.stackexchange.com/questions/1127483/…
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
If you are asking this question, it probably means that you do not have enough experience with algebra
$endgroup$
– rash
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Also see How to explain the flipping of division by a fraction? on Mathematics Educators, showcasing many attempts at an intuitive and elementary explanation.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
1 hour ago