Why is the reciprocal used in fraction division?How to make sense of fractions?How do I rewrite -100+1/2 as the mixed number -99 1/2?Fraction exponents in divisionfraction division understandingFraction and Decimal: Reciprocal of x's non-integerWhy was I taught to convert “improper fractions” into mixed numbers?The division of a fraction - Whole or Part?division by fraction proofWhen dividing by a fraction, why can you not take the reciprocal of term involving addition/subtraction?How to tell when a fraction does not end?Basic division problem: dividing a fraction by a fraction

Way of refund if scammed?

VHDL: Why is it hard to design a floating point unit in hardware?

Surface of the 3x3x3 cube as a graph

Variable does not Exist: CaseTrigger

If change in free energy (G) is positive, how do those reactions still occur?

Efficient Algorithms for Destroyed Document Reconstruction

Is it OK to look at the list of played moves during the game to determine the status of the 50 move rule?

What is this dime sized black bug with white on the segments near Loveland Colorodao?

Is there an idiom that means that you are in a very strong negotiation position in a negotiation?

Keeping the dodos out of the field

Is the default 512 byte physical sector size appropriate for SSD disks under Linux?

Is it normal to "extract a paper" from a master thesis?

Why the work done is positive when bringing 2 opposite charges together?

Proto-Indo-European (PIE) words with IPA

Why do testers need root cause analysis?

What does it mean for something to be strictly less than epsilon for an arbitrary epsilon?

Writing "hahaha" versus describing the laugh

Existence of a model of ZFC in which the natural numbers are really the natural numbers

Is there a word for pant sleeves?

Department head said that group project may be rejected. How to mitigate?

Can someone get a spouse off a deed that never lived together and was incarcerated?

How many wires should be in a new thermostat cable?

Can diplomats be allowed on the flight deck of a commercial European airline?

Why is this integration method not valid?



Why is the reciprocal used in fraction division?


How to make sense of fractions?How do I rewrite -100+1/2 as the mixed number -99 1/2?Fraction exponents in divisionfraction division understandingFraction and Decimal: Reciprocal of x's non-integerWhy was I taught to convert “improper fractions” into mixed numbers?The division of a fraction - Whole or Part?division by fraction proofWhen dividing by a fraction, why can you not take the reciprocal of term involving addition/subtraction?How to tell when a fraction does not end?Basic division problem: dividing a fraction by a fraction













2












$begingroup$


I don't know if this is a basic question or whatever, but I can't seem to find an answer.



As far as I understand the reciprocal of a number the inverse of that number, that still doesn't clarify why it is needed.



For many years I've only ever done math like if I were a robot. I just did it and never understood what I was doing. So when I went and divided fractions I just used the reciprocal, because "that was the way to do it". I want to understand math at a deeper level, especially subjects like probability, statistics, calculus, and linear algebra. To do that I have to understand the fundamentals however.



Any response is appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    To clarify, is your question regarding how reciprocal multiplication can be used to divide by any nonzero number, or specifically just in the case when you’re dividing by a fraction?
    $endgroup$
    – KronZ
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    This may be helpful. math.stackexchange.com/questions/1127483/…
    $endgroup$
    – Ethan Bolker
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    If you are asking this question, it probably means that you do not have enough experience with algebra
    $endgroup$
    – rash
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Also see How to explain the flipping of division by a fraction? on Mathematics Educators, showcasing many attempts at an intuitive and elementary explanation.
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    1 hour ago
















2












$begingroup$


I don't know if this is a basic question or whatever, but I can't seem to find an answer.



As far as I understand the reciprocal of a number the inverse of that number, that still doesn't clarify why it is needed.



For many years I've only ever done math like if I were a robot. I just did it and never understood what I was doing. So when I went and divided fractions I just used the reciprocal, because "that was the way to do it". I want to understand math at a deeper level, especially subjects like probability, statistics, calculus, and linear algebra. To do that I have to understand the fundamentals however.



Any response is appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    To clarify, is your question regarding how reciprocal multiplication can be used to divide by any nonzero number, or specifically just in the case when you’re dividing by a fraction?
    $endgroup$
    – KronZ
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    This may be helpful. math.stackexchange.com/questions/1127483/…
    $endgroup$
    – Ethan Bolker
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    If you are asking this question, it probably means that you do not have enough experience with algebra
    $endgroup$
    – rash
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Also see How to explain the flipping of division by a fraction? on Mathematics Educators, showcasing many attempts at an intuitive and elementary explanation.
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    1 hour ago














2












2








2


1



$begingroup$


I don't know if this is a basic question or whatever, but I can't seem to find an answer.



As far as I understand the reciprocal of a number the inverse of that number, that still doesn't clarify why it is needed.



For many years I've only ever done math like if I were a robot. I just did it and never understood what I was doing. So when I went and divided fractions I just used the reciprocal, because "that was the way to do it". I want to understand math at a deeper level, especially subjects like probability, statistics, calculus, and linear algebra. To do that I have to understand the fundamentals however.



Any response is appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I don't know if this is a basic question or whatever, but I can't seem to find an answer.



As far as I understand the reciprocal of a number the inverse of that number, that still doesn't clarify why it is needed.



For many years I've only ever done math like if I were a robot. I just did it and never understood what I was doing. So when I went and divided fractions I just used the reciprocal, because "that was the way to do it". I want to understand math at a deeper level, especially subjects like probability, statistics, calculus, and linear algebra. To do that I have to understand the fundamentals however.



Any response is appreciated.







fractions






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 2 hours ago









ArgusArgus

20418




20418











  • $begingroup$
    To clarify, is your question regarding how reciprocal multiplication can be used to divide by any nonzero number, or specifically just in the case when you’re dividing by a fraction?
    $endgroup$
    – KronZ
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    This may be helpful. math.stackexchange.com/questions/1127483/…
    $endgroup$
    – Ethan Bolker
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    If you are asking this question, it probably means that you do not have enough experience with algebra
    $endgroup$
    – rash
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Also see How to explain the flipping of division by a fraction? on Mathematics Educators, showcasing many attempts at an intuitive and elementary explanation.
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    1 hour ago

















  • $begingroup$
    To clarify, is your question regarding how reciprocal multiplication can be used to divide by any nonzero number, or specifically just in the case when you’re dividing by a fraction?
    $endgroup$
    – KronZ
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    This may be helpful. math.stackexchange.com/questions/1127483/…
    $endgroup$
    – Ethan Bolker
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    If you are asking this question, it probably means that you do not have enough experience with algebra
    $endgroup$
    – rash
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Also see How to explain the flipping of division by a fraction? on Mathematics Educators, showcasing many attempts at an intuitive and elementary explanation.
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    1 hour ago
















$begingroup$
To clarify, is your question regarding how reciprocal multiplication can be used to divide by any nonzero number, or specifically just in the case when you’re dividing by a fraction?
$endgroup$
– KronZ
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
To clarify, is your question regarding how reciprocal multiplication can be used to divide by any nonzero number, or specifically just in the case when you’re dividing by a fraction?
$endgroup$
– KronZ
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
This may be helpful. math.stackexchange.com/questions/1127483/…
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
This may be helpful. math.stackexchange.com/questions/1127483/…
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
If you are asking this question, it probably means that you do not have enough experience with algebra
$endgroup$
– rash
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
If you are asking this question, it probably means that you do not have enough experience with algebra
$endgroup$
– rash
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
Also see How to explain the flipping of division by a fraction? on Mathematics Educators, showcasing many attempts at an intuitive and elementary explanation.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
1 hour ago





$begingroup$
Also see How to explain the flipping of division by a fraction? on Mathematics Educators, showcasing many attempts at an intuitive and elementary explanation.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
1 hour ago











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

I think you're asking why the rule for division of fractions,
$$fracpq div fracrs = fracpq cdot fracsr,$$
works.
And I'm assuming that you're already comfortable with how to multiply fractions.



We need to go back to what division is supposed to achieve in the first place. When we look into that, the answer is that $Adiv B$ means something that gives $A$ when we multiply it by $B$ -- or, written in symbols, $Adiv B$ means the $X$ that solves the equation $$ Xcdot B = A $$



When our $A$ and $B$ are fraction, the "reciprocal" division rule can be regarded as a trick that happens to produce an $X$ that works. It's easy enough to see that it does work: If we're dividing $frac pq div frac rs$ we need to solve the equation
$$ X cdot frac rs = frac pq $$
And indeed setting $X=frac pqcdot frac sr = fracpsqr$ does this:
$$ fracpsqrcdotfrac rs = fracpscdot rqrcdot s = fracpcdot srqcdot sr = frac pq$$
like we want. (I'm also assuming that you're comfortable with cancelling the common factor $sr$ in the middle fraction).



This computation hopefully also gives some ides why it works, at least part way. In $fracpsqr$ the $p$ and $q$ are what we want to end up with, and the $s$ and $r$ are there to "neutralize" the $r$ and $s$ we have but want to discard. By making sure that the product has exactly one $r$ and one $s$ on each side of the fraction bar they make sure we can cancel them away.



Writing the solution $fracpsqr$ as $frac pqcdot frac sr$ might be best understood as just an easy way to remember what goes where. But this memory trick itself then also serves as motivation for considering the reciprocal to be an interesting operation in its own right in higher algebra.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    0












    $begingroup$

    Your question isn't completely clear but what I understood is that you don't get why $$fracfracabfraccd= fracab*fracdc$$ the answer it's located in the axioms of the real numbers, a number $b$ it's the reciprocal of a number $d$ if $$ d*b=1$$ now, let's see the definition of fraction $$e/f=e*f^-1$$ with $f^-1$ the reciprocal of $f$, therefore $$fracfracabfraccd=fracab(fraccd)^-1$$ and since $$fraccd*fracdc=1$$ we have $$fracfracabfraccd= fracab*fracdc$$ our result






    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor



    Mario Aldean is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





    $endgroup$













      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3232527%2fwhy-is-the-reciprocal-used-in-fraction-division%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3












      $begingroup$

      I think you're asking why the rule for division of fractions,
      $$fracpq div fracrs = fracpq cdot fracsr,$$
      works.
      And I'm assuming that you're already comfortable with how to multiply fractions.



      We need to go back to what division is supposed to achieve in the first place. When we look into that, the answer is that $Adiv B$ means something that gives $A$ when we multiply it by $B$ -- or, written in symbols, $Adiv B$ means the $X$ that solves the equation $$ Xcdot B = A $$



      When our $A$ and $B$ are fraction, the "reciprocal" division rule can be regarded as a trick that happens to produce an $X$ that works. It's easy enough to see that it does work: If we're dividing $frac pq div frac rs$ we need to solve the equation
      $$ X cdot frac rs = frac pq $$
      And indeed setting $X=frac pqcdot frac sr = fracpsqr$ does this:
      $$ fracpsqrcdotfrac rs = fracpscdot rqrcdot s = fracpcdot srqcdot sr = frac pq$$
      like we want. (I'm also assuming that you're comfortable with cancelling the common factor $sr$ in the middle fraction).



      This computation hopefully also gives some ides why it works, at least part way. In $fracpsqr$ the $p$ and $q$ are what we want to end up with, and the $s$ and $r$ are there to "neutralize" the $r$ and $s$ we have but want to discard. By making sure that the product has exactly one $r$ and one $s$ on each side of the fraction bar they make sure we can cancel them away.



      Writing the solution $fracpsqr$ as $frac pqcdot frac sr$ might be best understood as just an easy way to remember what goes where. But this memory trick itself then also serves as motivation for considering the reciprocal to be an interesting operation in its own right in higher algebra.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$

















        3












        $begingroup$

        I think you're asking why the rule for division of fractions,
        $$fracpq div fracrs = fracpq cdot fracsr,$$
        works.
        And I'm assuming that you're already comfortable with how to multiply fractions.



        We need to go back to what division is supposed to achieve in the first place. When we look into that, the answer is that $Adiv B$ means something that gives $A$ when we multiply it by $B$ -- or, written in symbols, $Adiv B$ means the $X$ that solves the equation $$ Xcdot B = A $$



        When our $A$ and $B$ are fraction, the "reciprocal" division rule can be regarded as a trick that happens to produce an $X$ that works. It's easy enough to see that it does work: If we're dividing $frac pq div frac rs$ we need to solve the equation
        $$ X cdot frac rs = frac pq $$
        And indeed setting $X=frac pqcdot frac sr = fracpsqr$ does this:
        $$ fracpsqrcdotfrac rs = fracpscdot rqrcdot s = fracpcdot srqcdot sr = frac pq$$
        like we want. (I'm also assuming that you're comfortable with cancelling the common factor $sr$ in the middle fraction).



        This computation hopefully also gives some ides why it works, at least part way. In $fracpsqr$ the $p$ and $q$ are what we want to end up with, and the $s$ and $r$ are there to "neutralize" the $r$ and $s$ we have but want to discard. By making sure that the product has exactly one $r$ and one $s$ on each side of the fraction bar they make sure we can cancel them away.



        Writing the solution $fracpsqr$ as $frac pqcdot frac sr$ might be best understood as just an easy way to remember what goes where. But this memory trick itself then also serves as motivation for considering the reciprocal to be an interesting operation in its own right in higher algebra.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$















          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          I think you're asking why the rule for division of fractions,
          $$fracpq div fracrs = fracpq cdot fracsr,$$
          works.
          And I'm assuming that you're already comfortable with how to multiply fractions.



          We need to go back to what division is supposed to achieve in the first place. When we look into that, the answer is that $Adiv B$ means something that gives $A$ when we multiply it by $B$ -- or, written in symbols, $Adiv B$ means the $X$ that solves the equation $$ Xcdot B = A $$



          When our $A$ and $B$ are fraction, the "reciprocal" division rule can be regarded as a trick that happens to produce an $X$ that works. It's easy enough to see that it does work: If we're dividing $frac pq div frac rs$ we need to solve the equation
          $$ X cdot frac rs = frac pq $$
          And indeed setting $X=frac pqcdot frac sr = fracpsqr$ does this:
          $$ fracpsqrcdotfrac rs = fracpscdot rqrcdot s = fracpcdot srqcdot sr = frac pq$$
          like we want. (I'm also assuming that you're comfortable with cancelling the common factor $sr$ in the middle fraction).



          This computation hopefully also gives some ides why it works, at least part way. In $fracpsqr$ the $p$ and $q$ are what we want to end up with, and the $s$ and $r$ are there to "neutralize" the $r$ and $s$ we have but want to discard. By making sure that the product has exactly one $r$ and one $s$ on each side of the fraction bar they make sure we can cancel them away.



          Writing the solution $fracpsqr$ as $frac pqcdot frac sr$ might be best understood as just an easy way to remember what goes where. But this memory trick itself then also serves as motivation for considering the reciprocal to be an interesting operation in its own right in higher algebra.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          I think you're asking why the rule for division of fractions,
          $$fracpq div fracrs = fracpq cdot fracsr,$$
          works.
          And I'm assuming that you're already comfortable with how to multiply fractions.



          We need to go back to what division is supposed to achieve in the first place. When we look into that, the answer is that $Adiv B$ means something that gives $A$ when we multiply it by $B$ -- or, written in symbols, $Adiv B$ means the $X$ that solves the equation $$ Xcdot B = A $$



          When our $A$ and $B$ are fraction, the "reciprocal" division rule can be regarded as a trick that happens to produce an $X$ that works. It's easy enough to see that it does work: If we're dividing $frac pq div frac rs$ we need to solve the equation
          $$ X cdot frac rs = frac pq $$
          And indeed setting $X=frac pqcdot frac sr = fracpsqr$ does this:
          $$ fracpsqrcdotfrac rs = fracpscdot rqrcdot s = fracpcdot srqcdot sr = frac pq$$
          like we want. (I'm also assuming that you're comfortable with cancelling the common factor $sr$ in the middle fraction).



          This computation hopefully also gives some ides why it works, at least part way. In $fracpsqr$ the $p$ and $q$ are what we want to end up with, and the $s$ and $r$ are there to "neutralize" the $r$ and $s$ we have but want to discard. By making sure that the product has exactly one $r$ and one $s$ on each side of the fraction bar they make sure we can cancel them away.



          Writing the solution $fracpsqr$ as $frac pqcdot frac sr$ might be best understood as just an easy way to remember what goes where. But this memory trick itself then also serves as motivation for considering the reciprocal to be an interesting operation in its own right in higher algebra.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 1 hour ago

























          answered 1 hour ago









          Henning MakholmHenning Makholm

          246k17316561




          246k17316561





















              0












              $begingroup$

              Your question isn't completely clear but what I understood is that you don't get why $$fracfracabfraccd= fracab*fracdc$$ the answer it's located in the axioms of the real numbers, a number $b$ it's the reciprocal of a number $d$ if $$ d*b=1$$ now, let's see the definition of fraction $$e/f=e*f^-1$$ with $f^-1$ the reciprocal of $f$, therefore $$fracfracabfraccd=fracab(fraccd)^-1$$ and since $$fraccd*fracdc=1$$ we have $$fracfracabfraccd= fracab*fracdc$$ our result






              share|cite|improve this answer








              New contributor



              Mario Aldean is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.





              $endgroup$

















                0












                $begingroup$

                Your question isn't completely clear but what I understood is that you don't get why $$fracfracabfraccd= fracab*fracdc$$ the answer it's located in the axioms of the real numbers, a number $b$ it's the reciprocal of a number $d$ if $$ d*b=1$$ now, let's see the definition of fraction $$e/f=e*f^-1$$ with $f^-1$ the reciprocal of $f$, therefore $$fracfracabfraccd=fracab(fraccd)^-1$$ and since $$fraccd*fracdc=1$$ we have $$fracfracabfraccd= fracab*fracdc$$ our result






                share|cite|improve this answer








                New contributor



                Mario Aldean is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.





                $endgroup$















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  Your question isn't completely clear but what I understood is that you don't get why $$fracfracabfraccd= fracab*fracdc$$ the answer it's located in the axioms of the real numbers, a number $b$ it's the reciprocal of a number $d$ if $$ d*b=1$$ now, let's see the definition of fraction $$e/f=e*f^-1$$ with $f^-1$ the reciprocal of $f$, therefore $$fracfracabfraccd=fracab(fraccd)^-1$$ and since $$fraccd*fracdc=1$$ we have $$fracfracabfraccd= fracab*fracdc$$ our result






                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  New contributor



                  Mario Aldean is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  $endgroup$



                  Your question isn't completely clear but what I understood is that you don't get why $$fracfracabfraccd= fracab*fracdc$$ the answer it's located in the axioms of the real numbers, a number $b$ it's the reciprocal of a number $d$ if $$ d*b=1$$ now, let's see the definition of fraction $$e/f=e*f^-1$$ with $f^-1$ the reciprocal of $f$, therefore $$fracfracabfraccd=fracab(fraccd)^-1$$ and since $$fraccd*fracdc=1$$ we have $$fracfracabfraccd= fracab*fracdc$$ our result







                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  New contributor



                  Mario Aldean is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.








                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer






                  New contributor



                  Mario Aldean is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.








                  answered 1 hour ago









                  Mario AldeanMario Aldean

                  135




                  135




                  New contributor



                  Mario Aldean is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.




                  New contributor




                  Mario Aldean is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3232527%2fwhy-is-the-reciprocal-used-in-fraction-division%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                      Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                      Tom Holland Mục lục Đầu đời và giáo dục | Sự nghiệp | Cuộc sống cá nhân | Phim tham gia | Giải thưởng và đề cử | Chú thích | Liên kết ngoài | Trình đơn chuyển hướngProfile“Person Details for Thomas Stanley Holland, "England and Wales Birth Registration Index, 1837-2008" — FamilySearch.org”"Meet Tom Holland... the 16-year-old star of The Impossible""Schoolboy actor Tom Holland finds himself in Oscar contention for role in tsunami drama"“Naomi Watts on the Prince William and Harry's reaction to her film about the late Princess Diana”lưu trữ"Holland and Pflueger Are West End's Two New 'Billy Elliots'""I'm so envious of my son, the movie star! British writer Dominic Holland's spent 20 years trying to crack Hollywood - but he's been beaten to it by a very unlikely rival"“Richard and Margaret Povey of Jersey, Channel Islands, UK: Information about Thomas Stanley Holland”"Tom Holland to play Billy Elliot""New Billy Elliot leaving the garage"Billy Elliot the Musical - Tom Holland - Billy"A Tale of four Billys: Tom Holland""The Feel Good Factor""Thames Christian College schoolboys join Myleene Klass for The Feelgood Factor""Government launches £600,000 arts bursaries pilot""BILLY's Chapman, Holland, Gardner & Jackson-Keen Visit Prime Minister""Elton John 'blown away' by Billy Elliot fifth birthday" (video with John's interview and fragments of Holland's performance)"First News interviews Arrietty's Tom Holland"“33rd Critics' Circle Film Awards winners”“National Board of Review Current Awards”Bản gốc"Ron Howard Whaling Tale 'In The Heart Of The Sea' Casts Tom Holland"“'Spider-Man' Finds Tom Holland to Star as New Web-Slinger”lưu trữ“Captain America: Civil War (2016)”“Film Review: ‘Captain America: Civil War’”lưu trữ“‘Captain America: Civil War’ review: Choose your own avenger”lưu trữ“The Lost City of Z reviews”“Sony Pictures and Marvel Studios Find Their 'Spider-Man' Star and Director”“‘Mary Magdalene’, ‘Current War’ & ‘Wind River’ Get 2017 Release Dates From Weinstein”“Lionsgate Unleashing Daisy Ridley & Tom Holland Starrer ‘Chaos Walking’ In Cannes”“PTA's 'Master' Leads Chicago Film Critics Nominations, UPDATED: Houston and Indiana Critics Nominations”“Nominaciones Goya 2013 Telecinco Cinema – ENG”“Jameson Empire Film Awards: Martin Freeman wins best actor for performance in The Hobbit”“34th Annual Young Artist Awards”Bản gốc“Teen Choice Awards 2016—Captain America: Civil War Leads Second Wave of Nominations”“BAFTA Film Award Nominations: ‘La La Land’ Leads Race”“Saturn Awards Nominations 2017: 'Rogue One,' 'Walking Dead' Lead”Tom HollandTom HollandTom HollandTom Hollandmedia.gettyimages.comWorldCat Identities300279794no20130442900000 0004 0355 42791085670554170004732cb16706349t(data)XX5557367