Why does a variable size struct not compile in the Arduino IDE?Why can't the new Arduino IDE 1.6.7 compile extern “C”?How can Arduino know that the number in a variable is a pin number and not something else?Advice for checking integrity of serial char strings?Arduino: put string through variable in arrayHow does Arduino IDE 'Get Board Info'?Transfer serial data to struct variable in ArduinoArduino not adding decimals correctly on double variableWhy does this array have stored values in it even though I have not put any values in it?Arduino OTA port not updating in Arduino IDEGlobal Variable does not Change when Value is set within Boolean Function
How do I compare the result of "1d20+x, with advantage" to "1d20+y, without advantage", assuming x < y?
What does this quote in Small Gods refer to?
How did Thanos not realise this had happened at the end of Endgame?
Why does it take longer to fly from London to Xi'an than to Beijing
How to find the tex encoding of specific fonts?
How to get a ellipse shaped node in Tikz Network?
How does the Time Stop spell work when being grappled?
Why are low spin tetrahedral complexes so rare?
What's the difference between const array and static const array in C/C++
Was there a contingency plan in place if Little Boy failed to detonate?
Why is the Sun made of light elements only?
Is ‘despite that’ right?
Why does a variable size struct not compile in the Arduino IDE?
Would encrypting a database protect against a compromised admin account?
Succinct and gender-neutral Russian word for "writer"
Why should password hash verification be time constant?
Should I pay on student loans in deferment or continue to snowball other debts?
Improving Sati-Sampajañña (situative wisdom)
Pre-1993 comic in which Wolverine's claws were turned to rubber?
Has magnetic core memory been used beyond the Moon?
How to efficiently lower your karma
Why does the Earth follow an elliptical trajectory rather than a parabolic one?
Is there a need for better software for writers?
Company stopped paying my salary. What are my options?
Why does a variable size struct not compile in the Arduino IDE?
Why can't the new Arduino IDE 1.6.7 compile extern “C”?How can Arduino know that the number in a variable is a pin number and not something else?Advice for checking integrity of serial char strings?Arduino: put string through variable in arrayHow does Arduino IDE 'Get Board Info'?Transfer serial data to struct variable in ArduinoArduino not adding decimals correctly on double variableWhy does this array have stored values in it even though I have not put any values in it?Arduino OTA port not updating in Arduino IDEGlobal Variable does not Change when Value is set within Boolean Function
This sketch does not compile in the Arduino IDE
void setup()
// put your setup code here, to run once:
struct test
int i;
char variable[];
;
typedef struct test test;
test t =
0, "hi"
;
void loop()
// put your main code here, to run repeatedly:
Arduino throws
sketch_may09a:16: error: initializer-string for array of chars is too long [-fpermissive]
};
^
exit status 1
initializer-string for array of chars is too long [-fpermissive]
However compiling with g++ works just fine. How can I fix it? Or is there a principle reason why flexible array members are not supported?
programming array struct
New contributor
add a comment |
This sketch does not compile in the Arduino IDE
void setup()
// put your setup code here, to run once:
struct test
int i;
char variable[];
;
typedef struct test test;
test t =
0, "hi"
;
void loop()
// put your main code here, to run repeatedly:
Arduino throws
sketch_may09a:16: error: initializer-string for array of chars is too long [-fpermissive]
};
^
exit status 1
initializer-string for array of chars is too long [-fpermissive]
However compiling with g++ works just fine. How can I fix it? Or is there a principle reason why flexible array members are not supported?
programming array struct
New contributor
1
It hurts to see that code, so it must be wrong. A struct is a definition of a variable (wich contains other variables). How would you create an array of those structs when they have different lengths?
– Jot
9 hours ago
@Jot: The struct type itself is declared correctly. There's nothing wrong with an[]
array as the last member of astruct
. However, in standard C language the only way to make such structs to "have different lengths" is tomalloc
them individually. This is what this[]
feature is designed for. In all other contexts the[]
array simply "disappears" (i.e. it is an array of size 0). So, the issue simply does not exist in situations when one'd try to create an array of such structs.
– AnT
8 hours ago
@AnT I know that it is set to zero size and I have read your answer with the correct type definition and declaration of the structs. the_architect tries to put the characters into the struct itself. That is not possible.
– Jot
8 hours ago
@Jot Not sure what answer you are talking about. Placing the characters into the struct itself, as the OP is trying to, is possible through GNU-specific extension. As I said already, the OP code is perfectly correct from GNU point of view.
– AnT
8 hours ago
add a comment |
This sketch does not compile in the Arduino IDE
void setup()
// put your setup code here, to run once:
struct test
int i;
char variable[];
;
typedef struct test test;
test t =
0, "hi"
;
void loop()
// put your main code here, to run repeatedly:
Arduino throws
sketch_may09a:16: error: initializer-string for array of chars is too long [-fpermissive]
};
^
exit status 1
initializer-string for array of chars is too long [-fpermissive]
However compiling with g++ works just fine. How can I fix it? Or is there a principle reason why flexible array members are not supported?
programming array struct
New contributor
This sketch does not compile in the Arduino IDE
void setup()
// put your setup code here, to run once:
struct test
int i;
char variable[];
;
typedef struct test test;
test t =
0, "hi"
;
void loop()
// put your main code here, to run repeatedly:
Arduino throws
sketch_may09a:16: error: initializer-string for array of chars is too long [-fpermissive]
};
^
exit status 1
initializer-string for array of chars is too long [-fpermissive]
However compiling with g++ works just fine. How can I fix it? Or is there a principle reason why flexible array members are not supported?
programming array struct
programming array struct
New contributor
New contributor
edited 7 hours ago
Glorfindel
4331512
4331512
New contributor
asked 9 hours ago
the_architectthe_architect
1062
1062
New contributor
New contributor
1
It hurts to see that code, so it must be wrong. A struct is a definition of a variable (wich contains other variables). How would you create an array of those structs when they have different lengths?
– Jot
9 hours ago
@Jot: The struct type itself is declared correctly. There's nothing wrong with an[]
array as the last member of astruct
. However, in standard C language the only way to make such structs to "have different lengths" is tomalloc
them individually. This is what this[]
feature is designed for. In all other contexts the[]
array simply "disappears" (i.e. it is an array of size 0). So, the issue simply does not exist in situations when one'd try to create an array of such structs.
– AnT
8 hours ago
@AnT I know that it is set to zero size and I have read your answer with the correct type definition and declaration of the structs. the_architect tries to put the characters into the struct itself. That is not possible.
– Jot
8 hours ago
@Jot Not sure what answer you are talking about. Placing the characters into the struct itself, as the OP is trying to, is possible through GNU-specific extension. As I said already, the OP code is perfectly correct from GNU point of view.
– AnT
8 hours ago
add a comment |
1
It hurts to see that code, so it must be wrong. A struct is a definition of a variable (wich contains other variables). How would you create an array of those structs when they have different lengths?
– Jot
9 hours ago
@Jot: The struct type itself is declared correctly. There's nothing wrong with an[]
array as the last member of astruct
. However, in standard C language the only way to make such structs to "have different lengths" is tomalloc
them individually. This is what this[]
feature is designed for. In all other contexts the[]
array simply "disappears" (i.e. it is an array of size 0). So, the issue simply does not exist in situations when one'd try to create an array of such structs.
– AnT
8 hours ago
@AnT I know that it is set to zero size and I have read your answer with the correct type definition and declaration of the structs. the_architect tries to put the characters into the struct itself. That is not possible.
– Jot
8 hours ago
@Jot Not sure what answer you are talking about. Placing the characters into the struct itself, as the OP is trying to, is possible through GNU-specific extension. As I said already, the OP code is perfectly correct from GNU point of view.
– AnT
8 hours ago
1
1
It hurts to see that code, so it must be wrong. A struct is a definition of a variable (wich contains other variables). How would you create an array of those structs when they have different lengths?
– Jot
9 hours ago
It hurts to see that code, so it must be wrong. A struct is a definition of a variable (wich contains other variables). How would you create an array of those structs when they have different lengths?
– Jot
9 hours ago
@Jot: The struct type itself is declared correctly. There's nothing wrong with an
[]
array as the last member of a struct
. However, in standard C language the only way to make such structs to "have different lengths" is to malloc
them individually. This is what this []
feature is designed for. In all other contexts the []
array simply "disappears" (i.e. it is an array of size 0). So, the issue simply does not exist in situations when one'd try to create an array of such structs.– AnT
8 hours ago
@Jot: The struct type itself is declared correctly. There's nothing wrong with an
[]
array as the last member of a struct
. However, in standard C language the only way to make such structs to "have different lengths" is to malloc
them individually. This is what this []
feature is designed for. In all other contexts the []
array simply "disappears" (i.e. it is an array of size 0). So, the issue simply does not exist in situations when one'd try to create an array of such structs.– AnT
8 hours ago
@AnT I know that it is set to zero size and I have read your answer with the correct type definition and declaration of the structs. the_architect tries to put the characters into the struct itself. That is not possible.
– Jot
8 hours ago
@AnT I know that it is set to zero size and I have read your answer with the correct type definition and declaration of the structs. the_architect tries to put the characters into the struct itself. That is not possible.
– Jot
8 hours ago
@Jot Not sure what answer you are talking about. Placing the characters into the struct itself, as the OP is trying to, is possible through GNU-specific extension. As I said already, the OP code is perfectly correct from GNU point of view.
– AnT
8 hours ago
@Jot Not sure what answer you are talking about. Placing the characters into the struct itself, as the OP is trying to, is possible through GNU-specific extension. As I said already, the OP code is perfectly correct from GNU point of view.
– AnT
8 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Maybe you've compiled it in g++ without any warnings enabled (or maybe it yeld warnings but was compiled). The arduino uses flags to consider all warnings as an error, so it won't compile. It may wary for different platforms, I've got -fpermissive used (and I don't like it at all).
That's because size of struct must be known compile time and if you provide char variable[];
you'll get zero sized array. Therefore anything biiger than nothing you'll try to initialize for is too long.
Maybe you're looking for something like this:
struct test
int a;
const char * ptr;
;
test paramx 1, "some string";
test paramy 2, "another string";
test array[] = 3,"three", 4, "four", 5,"five";
char variable[];
is not a zero-sized array. It is a flexible array. In standard C its size depends on how much memory was allocated by the user for the whole struct object. And in extended GNU-C the extra memory can be requested the way the OP requests it: by using aninitializer. As far as GNU-C is concerned, the code is perfectly fine.
– AnT
9 hours ago
1
And it works like it's zero size array pointing after the end of struct, so you have to allocate more than sizeof(struct) to use it without "buffer overflow". But as it was noted, it can't work on statically allocated struct instance. And in C++ it has to be struct containing POD's only.
– KIIV
8 hours ago
Well, it can't work for non-dynamic struct object in pedantic standard C. But the OP is apparently not trying to use pedantic standard C. And yes, it can and will work in extended GNU-C (and in GNU-C++ after version 6 of the compiler). The original code is perfectly fine as far as GNU-extended versions of these languages are concerned. The code will compile and work as intended in Arduino IDE once it is placed into a.c
file, as I clearly stated in my answer. Once Arduino IDE moves to a later version of AVR-GCC, this code will compile and work as intended right away.
– AnT
8 hours ago
Hower I'm not sure he really wanted to use FAM. It might be just coincidence. Maybe he wanted justconst char * variable;
That should be perfectly legal in this case (or flash string helpers / progmem pointers)
– KIIV
8 hours ago
The title of the question seems to suggest that the OP did actually want to use a variable-size struct. Whether they meant it literally, as a reference to this specific language feature - I don't know.
– AnT
8 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Flexible array member is a C feature. It does not exist in C++. On top of that, the way you use it to declare and initialize a static struct of flexible size is non-standard even for C.
However, GNU-C language supports it as an extension. Also, newer versions of GCC (6 and higher) allow this in GNU-C++ code as an extension as well. But GCC 5.4.0 used by Arduino IDE doesn't support this non-standard feature in C++ code.
If you flip through different GCC versions on Godbolt (https://godbolt.org/z/Iul7hD) you'll see that support for this feature has always been present in C code, but for C++ code it first appeared in GCC 6.
This is why you were able to compile it with your standalone g++
compiler (which is apparently a much later version), but were unable to compile it in Arduino IDE.
It means that if you really want this non-standard code to compile in the current version of Arduino IDE, you have to place it into a .c
file. Or just specify the array size explicitly.
add a comment |
What the range voltage to supply arduino?
New contributor
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
– VE7JRO
6 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
StackExchange.schematics.init();
);
, "cicuitlab");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "540"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
the_architect is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2farduino.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f65267%2fwhy-does-a-variable-size-struct-not-compile-in-the-arduino-ide%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Maybe you've compiled it in g++ without any warnings enabled (or maybe it yeld warnings but was compiled). The arduino uses flags to consider all warnings as an error, so it won't compile. It may wary for different platforms, I've got -fpermissive used (and I don't like it at all).
That's because size of struct must be known compile time and if you provide char variable[];
you'll get zero sized array. Therefore anything biiger than nothing you'll try to initialize for is too long.
Maybe you're looking for something like this:
struct test
int a;
const char * ptr;
;
test paramx 1, "some string";
test paramy 2, "another string";
test array[] = 3,"three", 4, "four", 5,"five";
char variable[];
is not a zero-sized array. It is a flexible array. In standard C its size depends on how much memory was allocated by the user for the whole struct object. And in extended GNU-C the extra memory can be requested the way the OP requests it: by using aninitializer. As far as GNU-C is concerned, the code is perfectly fine.
– AnT
9 hours ago
1
And it works like it's zero size array pointing after the end of struct, so you have to allocate more than sizeof(struct) to use it without "buffer overflow". But as it was noted, it can't work on statically allocated struct instance. And in C++ it has to be struct containing POD's only.
– KIIV
8 hours ago
Well, it can't work for non-dynamic struct object in pedantic standard C. But the OP is apparently not trying to use pedantic standard C. And yes, it can and will work in extended GNU-C (and in GNU-C++ after version 6 of the compiler). The original code is perfectly fine as far as GNU-extended versions of these languages are concerned. The code will compile and work as intended in Arduino IDE once it is placed into a.c
file, as I clearly stated in my answer. Once Arduino IDE moves to a later version of AVR-GCC, this code will compile and work as intended right away.
– AnT
8 hours ago
Hower I'm not sure he really wanted to use FAM. It might be just coincidence. Maybe he wanted justconst char * variable;
That should be perfectly legal in this case (or flash string helpers / progmem pointers)
– KIIV
8 hours ago
The title of the question seems to suggest that the OP did actually want to use a variable-size struct. Whether they meant it literally, as a reference to this specific language feature - I don't know.
– AnT
8 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Maybe you've compiled it in g++ without any warnings enabled (or maybe it yeld warnings but was compiled). The arduino uses flags to consider all warnings as an error, so it won't compile. It may wary for different platforms, I've got -fpermissive used (and I don't like it at all).
That's because size of struct must be known compile time and if you provide char variable[];
you'll get zero sized array. Therefore anything biiger than nothing you'll try to initialize for is too long.
Maybe you're looking for something like this:
struct test
int a;
const char * ptr;
;
test paramx 1, "some string";
test paramy 2, "another string";
test array[] = 3,"three", 4, "four", 5,"five";
char variable[];
is not a zero-sized array. It is a flexible array. In standard C its size depends on how much memory was allocated by the user for the whole struct object. And in extended GNU-C the extra memory can be requested the way the OP requests it: by using aninitializer. As far as GNU-C is concerned, the code is perfectly fine.
– AnT
9 hours ago
1
And it works like it's zero size array pointing after the end of struct, so you have to allocate more than sizeof(struct) to use it without "buffer overflow". But as it was noted, it can't work on statically allocated struct instance. And in C++ it has to be struct containing POD's only.
– KIIV
8 hours ago
Well, it can't work for non-dynamic struct object in pedantic standard C. But the OP is apparently not trying to use pedantic standard C. And yes, it can and will work in extended GNU-C (and in GNU-C++ after version 6 of the compiler). The original code is perfectly fine as far as GNU-extended versions of these languages are concerned. The code will compile and work as intended in Arduino IDE once it is placed into a.c
file, as I clearly stated in my answer. Once Arduino IDE moves to a later version of AVR-GCC, this code will compile and work as intended right away.
– AnT
8 hours ago
Hower I'm not sure he really wanted to use FAM. It might be just coincidence. Maybe he wanted justconst char * variable;
That should be perfectly legal in this case (or flash string helpers / progmem pointers)
– KIIV
8 hours ago
The title of the question seems to suggest that the OP did actually want to use a variable-size struct. Whether they meant it literally, as a reference to this specific language feature - I don't know.
– AnT
8 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Maybe you've compiled it in g++ without any warnings enabled (or maybe it yeld warnings but was compiled). The arduino uses flags to consider all warnings as an error, so it won't compile. It may wary for different platforms, I've got -fpermissive used (and I don't like it at all).
That's because size of struct must be known compile time and if you provide char variable[];
you'll get zero sized array. Therefore anything biiger than nothing you'll try to initialize for is too long.
Maybe you're looking for something like this:
struct test
int a;
const char * ptr;
;
test paramx 1, "some string";
test paramy 2, "another string";
test array[] = 3,"three", 4, "four", 5,"five";
Maybe you've compiled it in g++ without any warnings enabled (or maybe it yeld warnings but was compiled). The arduino uses flags to consider all warnings as an error, so it won't compile. It may wary for different platforms, I've got -fpermissive used (and I don't like it at all).
That's because size of struct must be known compile time and if you provide char variable[];
you'll get zero sized array. Therefore anything biiger than nothing you'll try to initialize for is too long.
Maybe you're looking for something like this:
struct test
int a;
const char * ptr;
;
test paramx 1, "some string";
test paramy 2, "another string";
test array[] = 3,"three", 4, "four", 5,"five";
edited 8 hours ago
answered 9 hours ago
KIIVKIIV
3,7321617
3,7321617
char variable[];
is not a zero-sized array. It is a flexible array. In standard C its size depends on how much memory was allocated by the user for the whole struct object. And in extended GNU-C the extra memory can be requested the way the OP requests it: by using aninitializer. As far as GNU-C is concerned, the code is perfectly fine.
– AnT
9 hours ago
1
And it works like it's zero size array pointing after the end of struct, so you have to allocate more than sizeof(struct) to use it without "buffer overflow". But as it was noted, it can't work on statically allocated struct instance. And in C++ it has to be struct containing POD's only.
– KIIV
8 hours ago
Well, it can't work for non-dynamic struct object in pedantic standard C. But the OP is apparently not trying to use pedantic standard C. And yes, it can and will work in extended GNU-C (and in GNU-C++ after version 6 of the compiler). The original code is perfectly fine as far as GNU-extended versions of these languages are concerned. The code will compile and work as intended in Arduino IDE once it is placed into a.c
file, as I clearly stated in my answer. Once Arduino IDE moves to a later version of AVR-GCC, this code will compile and work as intended right away.
– AnT
8 hours ago
Hower I'm not sure he really wanted to use FAM. It might be just coincidence. Maybe he wanted justconst char * variable;
That should be perfectly legal in this case (or flash string helpers / progmem pointers)
– KIIV
8 hours ago
The title of the question seems to suggest that the OP did actually want to use a variable-size struct. Whether they meant it literally, as a reference to this specific language feature - I don't know.
– AnT
8 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
char variable[];
is not a zero-sized array. It is a flexible array. In standard C its size depends on how much memory was allocated by the user for the whole struct object. And in extended GNU-C the extra memory can be requested the way the OP requests it: by using aninitializer. As far as GNU-C is concerned, the code is perfectly fine.
– AnT
9 hours ago
1
And it works like it's zero size array pointing after the end of struct, so you have to allocate more than sizeof(struct) to use it without "buffer overflow". But as it was noted, it can't work on statically allocated struct instance. And in C++ it has to be struct containing POD's only.
– KIIV
8 hours ago
Well, it can't work for non-dynamic struct object in pedantic standard C. But the OP is apparently not trying to use pedantic standard C. And yes, it can and will work in extended GNU-C (and in GNU-C++ after version 6 of the compiler). The original code is perfectly fine as far as GNU-extended versions of these languages are concerned. The code will compile and work as intended in Arduino IDE once it is placed into a.c
file, as I clearly stated in my answer. Once Arduino IDE moves to a later version of AVR-GCC, this code will compile and work as intended right away.
– AnT
8 hours ago
Hower I'm not sure he really wanted to use FAM. It might be just coincidence. Maybe he wanted justconst char * variable;
That should be perfectly legal in this case (or flash string helpers / progmem pointers)
– KIIV
8 hours ago
The title of the question seems to suggest that the OP did actually want to use a variable-size struct. Whether they meant it literally, as a reference to this specific language feature - I don't know.
– AnT
8 hours ago
char variable[];
is not a zero-sized array. It is a flexible array. In standard C its size depends on how much memory was allocated by the user for the whole struct object. And in extended GNU-C the extra memory can be requested the way the OP requests it: by using an
initializer. As far as GNU-C is concerned, the code is perfectly fine.– AnT
9 hours ago
char variable[];
is not a zero-sized array. It is a flexible array. In standard C its size depends on how much memory was allocated by the user for the whole struct object. And in extended GNU-C the extra memory can be requested the way the OP requests it: by using an
initializer. As far as GNU-C is concerned, the code is perfectly fine.– AnT
9 hours ago
1
1
And it works like it's zero size array pointing after the end of struct, so you have to allocate more than sizeof(struct) to use it without "buffer overflow". But as it was noted, it can't work on statically allocated struct instance. And in C++ it has to be struct containing POD's only.
– KIIV
8 hours ago
And it works like it's zero size array pointing after the end of struct, so you have to allocate more than sizeof(struct) to use it without "buffer overflow". But as it was noted, it can't work on statically allocated struct instance. And in C++ it has to be struct containing POD's only.
– KIIV
8 hours ago
Well, it can't work for non-dynamic struct object in pedantic standard C. But the OP is apparently not trying to use pedantic standard C. And yes, it can and will work in extended GNU-C (and in GNU-C++ after version 6 of the compiler). The original code is perfectly fine as far as GNU-extended versions of these languages are concerned. The code will compile and work as intended in Arduino IDE once it is placed into a
.c
file, as I clearly stated in my answer. Once Arduino IDE moves to a later version of AVR-GCC, this code will compile and work as intended right away.– AnT
8 hours ago
Well, it can't work for non-dynamic struct object in pedantic standard C. But the OP is apparently not trying to use pedantic standard C. And yes, it can and will work in extended GNU-C (and in GNU-C++ after version 6 of the compiler). The original code is perfectly fine as far as GNU-extended versions of these languages are concerned. The code will compile and work as intended in Arduino IDE once it is placed into a
.c
file, as I clearly stated in my answer. Once Arduino IDE moves to a later version of AVR-GCC, this code will compile and work as intended right away.– AnT
8 hours ago
Hower I'm not sure he really wanted to use FAM. It might be just coincidence. Maybe he wanted just
const char * variable;
That should be perfectly legal in this case (or flash string helpers / progmem pointers)– KIIV
8 hours ago
Hower I'm not sure he really wanted to use FAM. It might be just coincidence. Maybe he wanted just
const char * variable;
That should be perfectly legal in this case (or flash string helpers / progmem pointers)– KIIV
8 hours ago
The title of the question seems to suggest that the OP did actually want to use a variable-size struct. Whether they meant it literally, as a reference to this specific language feature - I don't know.
– AnT
8 hours ago
The title of the question seems to suggest that the OP did actually want to use a variable-size struct. Whether they meant it literally, as a reference to this specific language feature - I don't know.
– AnT
8 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Flexible array member is a C feature. It does not exist in C++. On top of that, the way you use it to declare and initialize a static struct of flexible size is non-standard even for C.
However, GNU-C language supports it as an extension. Also, newer versions of GCC (6 and higher) allow this in GNU-C++ code as an extension as well. But GCC 5.4.0 used by Arduino IDE doesn't support this non-standard feature in C++ code.
If you flip through different GCC versions on Godbolt (https://godbolt.org/z/Iul7hD) you'll see that support for this feature has always been present in C code, but for C++ code it first appeared in GCC 6.
This is why you were able to compile it with your standalone g++
compiler (which is apparently a much later version), but were unable to compile it in Arduino IDE.
It means that if you really want this non-standard code to compile in the current version of Arduino IDE, you have to place it into a .c
file. Or just specify the array size explicitly.
add a comment |
Flexible array member is a C feature. It does not exist in C++. On top of that, the way you use it to declare and initialize a static struct of flexible size is non-standard even for C.
However, GNU-C language supports it as an extension. Also, newer versions of GCC (6 and higher) allow this in GNU-C++ code as an extension as well. But GCC 5.4.0 used by Arduino IDE doesn't support this non-standard feature in C++ code.
If you flip through different GCC versions on Godbolt (https://godbolt.org/z/Iul7hD) you'll see that support for this feature has always been present in C code, but for C++ code it first appeared in GCC 6.
This is why you were able to compile it with your standalone g++
compiler (which is apparently a much later version), but were unable to compile it in Arduino IDE.
It means that if you really want this non-standard code to compile in the current version of Arduino IDE, you have to place it into a .c
file. Or just specify the array size explicitly.
add a comment |
Flexible array member is a C feature. It does not exist in C++. On top of that, the way you use it to declare and initialize a static struct of flexible size is non-standard even for C.
However, GNU-C language supports it as an extension. Also, newer versions of GCC (6 and higher) allow this in GNU-C++ code as an extension as well. But GCC 5.4.0 used by Arduino IDE doesn't support this non-standard feature in C++ code.
If you flip through different GCC versions on Godbolt (https://godbolt.org/z/Iul7hD) you'll see that support for this feature has always been present in C code, but for C++ code it first appeared in GCC 6.
This is why you were able to compile it with your standalone g++
compiler (which is apparently a much later version), but were unable to compile it in Arduino IDE.
It means that if you really want this non-standard code to compile in the current version of Arduino IDE, you have to place it into a .c
file. Or just specify the array size explicitly.
Flexible array member is a C feature. It does not exist in C++. On top of that, the way you use it to declare and initialize a static struct of flexible size is non-standard even for C.
However, GNU-C language supports it as an extension. Also, newer versions of GCC (6 and higher) allow this in GNU-C++ code as an extension as well. But GCC 5.4.0 used by Arduino IDE doesn't support this non-standard feature in C++ code.
If you flip through different GCC versions on Godbolt (https://godbolt.org/z/Iul7hD) you'll see that support for this feature has always been present in C code, but for C++ code it first appeared in GCC 6.
This is why you were able to compile it with your standalone g++
compiler (which is apparently a much later version), but were unable to compile it in Arduino IDE.
It means that if you really want this non-standard code to compile in the current version of Arduino IDE, you have to place it into a .c
file. Or just specify the array size explicitly.
edited 4 hours ago
answered 9 hours ago
AnTAnT
4088
4088
add a comment |
add a comment |
What the range voltage to supply arduino?
New contributor
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
– VE7JRO
6 hours ago
add a comment |
What the range voltage to supply arduino?
New contributor
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
– VE7JRO
6 hours ago
add a comment |
What the range voltage to supply arduino?
New contributor
What the range voltage to supply arduino?
New contributor
New contributor
answered 7 hours ago
Mechatronics clubMechatronics club
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
– VE7JRO
6 hours ago
add a comment |
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
– VE7JRO
6 hours ago
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
– VE7JRO
6 hours ago
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
– VE7JRO
6 hours ago
add a comment |
the_architect is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
the_architect is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
the_architect is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
the_architect is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Arduino Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2farduino.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f65267%2fwhy-does-a-variable-size-struct-not-compile-in-the-arduino-ide%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
It hurts to see that code, so it must be wrong. A struct is a definition of a variable (wich contains other variables). How would you create an array of those structs when they have different lengths?
– Jot
9 hours ago
@Jot: The struct type itself is declared correctly. There's nothing wrong with an
[]
array as the last member of astruct
. However, in standard C language the only way to make such structs to "have different lengths" is tomalloc
them individually. This is what this[]
feature is designed for. In all other contexts the[]
array simply "disappears" (i.e. it is an array of size 0). So, the issue simply does not exist in situations when one'd try to create an array of such structs.– AnT
8 hours ago
@AnT I know that it is set to zero size and I have read your answer with the correct type definition and declaration of the structs. the_architect tries to put the characters into the struct itself. That is not possible.
– Jot
8 hours ago
@Jot Not sure what answer you are talking about. Placing the characters into the struct itself, as the OP is trying to, is possible through GNU-specific extension. As I said already, the OP code is perfectly correct from GNU point of view.
– AnT
8 hours ago