Are there non-military uses of 20%-enriched Uranium?Why are some politicians saying the Iran Nuclear deal is bad?Why isn't there Israel nuclear talk?What benefits are there for a nation to sign the NPT?Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and Indian politicsWhy would Iran adhere to a nuclear non-proliferation agreement when North-Korea didn't?How big is Iran's military budget?What are the conditions of Iran's nuclear agreement?What's the point of non-nuclear nations signing an agreement to ban nuclear weapons?Why weren't any sanctions imposed on India for not signing the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons?Can the US Congress prevent a military action against Iran?

Why should password hash verification be time constant?

No such column 'DeveloperName' on entity 'RecordType' after Summer '19 release on sandbox

Passport stamps art, can it be done?

Why did Captain America age?

When quoting someone, is it proper to change "gotta" to "got to" without modifying the rest of the quote?

Why was the ancient one so hesitant to teach Dr Strange the art of sorcery

How did Thanos not realise this had happened at the end of Endgame?

A Cunning Riley Riddle

Peculiarities in low dimensions or low order or etc

Watching the game, having a puzzle

Why did they go to Dragonstone?

What was the plan for an abort of the Enola Gay's mission to drop the atomic bomb?

Has there been evidence of any other gods?

Is every story set in the future "science fiction"?

Is there an application which does HTTP PUT?

Why is PerfectForwardSecrecy considered OK, when it has same defects as salt-less password hashing?

Can 'sudo apt-get remove [write]' destroy my Ubuntu?

Why does the Earth follow an elliptical trajectory rather than a parabolic one?

My perfect evil overlord plan... or is it?

Is ‘despite that’ right?

The meaning of a て-form verb at the end of this sentence

Names of the Six Tastes

Intersecting with the x-axis / intersecting the x-axis

How is CoreiX like Corei5, i7 is related to Haswell, Ivy Bridge?



Are there non-military uses of 20%-enriched Uranium?


Why are some politicians saying the Iran Nuclear deal is bad?Why isn't there Israel nuclear talk?What benefits are there for a nation to sign the NPT?Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and Indian politicsWhy would Iran adhere to a nuclear non-proliferation agreement when North-Korea didn't?How big is Iran's military budget?What are the conditions of Iran's nuclear agreement?What's the point of non-nuclear nations signing an agreement to ban nuclear weapons?Why weren't any sanctions imposed on India for not signing the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons?Can the US Congress prevent a military action against Iran?













2















Following the US pulling out of the JCPOA agreement last year, Iran has announced it may resume Uranium enrichment, up to a level of 20% of U-235 (the more-active isotope, as opposed to U-238). The plan allows Iran to enrich to 3.67% U-235, for use in power plants.



Now, 20%-enriched Uranium can be used for (quicker) further enrichment to weapons-grade Uranium at around 80% or 90% U-235. And it can even theoretically itself be used in a weapon, although this is "not practical" as a design.



But - are there civilian uses of further-enriched Uranium? And specifically:



  • Are there benefits for using 20%-enriched Uranium for power generation?

  • Is there non-weapons research that uses 20%-enriched Uranium?

  • HOw was Iran using the 20%-enriched Uranium it had produced before the deal (if it was using it at all)?









share|improve this question


























    2















    Following the US pulling out of the JCPOA agreement last year, Iran has announced it may resume Uranium enrichment, up to a level of 20% of U-235 (the more-active isotope, as opposed to U-238). The plan allows Iran to enrich to 3.67% U-235, for use in power plants.



    Now, 20%-enriched Uranium can be used for (quicker) further enrichment to weapons-grade Uranium at around 80% or 90% U-235. And it can even theoretically itself be used in a weapon, although this is "not practical" as a design.



    But - are there civilian uses of further-enriched Uranium? And specifically:



    • Are there benefits for using 20%-enriched Uranium for power generation?

    • Is there non-weapons research that uses 20%-enriched Uranium?

    • HOw was Iran using the 20%-enriched Uranium it had produced before the deal (if it was using it at all)?









    share|improve this question
























      2












      2








      2








      Following the US pulling out of the JCPOA agreement last year, Iran has announced it may resume Uranium enrichment, up to a level of 20% of U-235 (the more-active isotope, as opposed to U-238). The plan allows Iran to enrich to 3.67% U-235, for use in power plants.



      Now, 20%-enriched Uranium can be used for (quicker) further enrichment to weapons-grade Uranium at around 80% or 90% U-235. And it can even theoretically itself be used in a weapon, although this is "not practical" as a design.



      But - are there civilian uses of further-enriched Uranium? And specifically:



      • Are there benefits for using 20%-enriched Uranium for power generation?

      • Is there non-weapons research that uses 20%-enriched Uranium?

      • HOw was Iran using the 20%-enriched Uranium it had produced before the deal (if it was using it at all)?









      share|improve this question














      Following the US pulling out of the JCPOA agreement last year, Iran has announced it may resume Uranium enrichment, up to a level of 20% of U-235 (the more-active isotope, as opposed to U-238). The plan allows Iran to enrich to 3.67% U-235, for use in power plants.



      Now, 20%-enriched Uranium can be used for (quicker) further enrichment to weapons-grade Uranium at around 80% or 90% U-235. And it can even theoretically itself be used in a weapon, although this is "not practical" as a design.



      But - are there civilian uses of further-enriched Uranium? And specifically:



      • Are there benefits for using 20%-enriched Uranium for power generation?

      • Is there non-weapons research that uses 20%-enriched Uranium?

      • HOw was Iran using the 20%-enriched Uranium it had produced before the deal (if it was using it at all)?






      nuclear-weapons iran nuclear-energy






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 4 hours ago









      einpoklumeinpoklum

      2,1811033




      2,1811033




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          Partial answer: It's usable as reactor fuel



          20% enrichment is also referred to as "High-assay Low-Enrichment Uranium" (HALEU). It has various benefits when used as a fuel in some reactors; see the Centrus page on HALEU.



          Apparently, it is already in use in existing research reactors in the US, for example - after 10 tonnes of the material had been produced by the Idaho National Lab. In Iran, there's a research reactor in Tehran for which 20%-enriched Uranium could be used as fuel; and apparently, Ali Akbar Salehi, head of the nuclear program, has said that's what Iran plans to do, basically



          According to the World Nuclear News website, many advanced reactor designs will require fuel from Uranium enriched to the 20% level. So it is quite conceivable that Iran may have planned energy-production uses for 20%-enriched Uranium.



          I can't speak to whether it actually has working reactors, or planned reactors, which use such fuel.






          share|improve this answer
































            1














            US HALEU (High-assay Low-Enrichment Uranium) reactors are intended to be fairly mobile. Basically the DOD is currently the only (US) customer. So claiming this has non-bomb uses is one thing. Claiming it has non-military uses (presently) is quite another. (Nevertheless, a HALEU reactor would be much bigger than a HEU reactor used on military naval craft.)




            according to Dr. Everett Redmond, senior technical advisor of the NEI’s New Reactor & Advanced Technology division, the DOE’s announcement is a significant leap in the right direction because no commercial facilities to make HALEU on a commercial scale or transportation infrastructure associated with uranium hexafluoride above 5% exist worldwide.




            On the other hand




            Massachusetts-based fuel company Lightbridge is developing HALEU for use in commercial fuel. It has said it wants to demonstrate the fuel in a research reactor at a U.S. national laboratory in 2020, as well as a commercial nuclear power plant powering a U.S. city by 2021.




            Also the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists doesn't find plausible (contra to the OP's own anwer) that Iran could use HALEU as fuel for their research reactor. Instead it says:




            If Iran’s claim that it’s enriching uranium to produce fuel for its research reactor is suspect, then we must examine the possibility that Tehran is intentionally moving toward a weapons capability. Although 20 percent enrichment is legal under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, it brings Iran a step closer to producing 90 percent enriched, bomb-grade uranium.



            A stockpile of 20 percent enriched uranium increases the breakout threat in two ways. First, by starting with 20 percent LEU–rather than the current stock of 3.5 percent–Iran cuts the time required to produce a bomb’s worth of material by more than one-half. Second, a higher degree of enrichment means that a smaller quantity of material presents a weapons threat.



            To make a bomb’s worth of highly enriched uranium, Iran would need to start with more than 5 tons of natural uranium or about 1 ton of its 3.5 percent LEU. But if it starts enriching with 20 percent enriched uranium, it would only need 130 kilograms. (All of these numbers depend on assumptions about the amount of uranium 235 lost in the waste, which tends to be high in Iran’s operations.)




            Also Iran has been working on and off on the HALEU for at least 6 years, when few considered HALEU commercially viable, including Iran's president:




            What has raised the world’s suspicions is that Iran continues to produce 20 percent enriched uranium despite the fact that this exceeds its civilian needs and, as President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad acknowledged in September [2011], does not make economic sense. [...]



            Iran’s entire uranium-enrichment program is now [2012] being devoted to producing 20 percent enriched uranium.




            That changed with the deal, of course.




            In case there's still doubt about the intent of this latest Iranian conditional announcement (to resume enirchment to HALEU levels), it coincides with another (conditional) annoucement to resume the work on the heavy water version of the research reactor, which is considered plan B for making weapons-grade material (plutonium in the latter case).






            share|improve this answer

























              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "475"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f41343%2fare-there-non-military-uses-of-20-enriched-uranium%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              1














              Partial answer: It's usable as reactor fuel



              20% enrichment is also referred to as "High-assay Low-Enrichment Uranium" (HALEU). It has various benefits when used as a fuel in some reactors; see the Centrus page on HALEU.



              Apparently, it is already in use in existing research reactors in the US, for example - after 10 tonnes of the material had been produced by the Idaho National Lab. In Iran, there's a research reactor in Tehran for which 20%-enriched Uranium could be used as fuel; and apparently, Ali Akbar Salehi, head of the nuclear program, has said that's what Iran plans to do, basically



              According to the World Nuclear News website, many advanced reactor designs will require fuel from Uranium enriched to the 20% level. So it is quite conceivable that Iran may have planned energy-production uses for 20%-enriched Uranium.



              I can't speak to whether it actually has working reactors, or planned reactors, which use such fuel.






              share|improve this answer





























                1














                Partial answer: It's usable as reactor fuel



                20% enrichment is also referred to as "High-assay Low-Enrichment Uranium" (HALEU). It has various benefits when used as a fuel in some reactors; see the Centrus page on HALEU.



                Apparently, it is already in use in existing research reactors in the US, for example - after 10 tonnes of the material had been produced by the Idaho National Lab. In Iran, there's a research reactor in Tehran for which 20%-enriched Uranium could be used as fuel; and apparently, Ali Akbar Salehi, head of the nuclear program, has said that's what Iran plans to do, basically



                According to the World Nuclear News website, many advanced reactor designs will require fuel from Uranium enriched to the 20% level. So it is quite conceivable that Iran may have planned energy-production uses for 20%-enriched Uranium.



                I can't speak to whether it actually has working reactors, or planned reactors, which use such fuel.






                share|improve this answer



























                  1












                  1








                  1







                  Partial answer: It's usable as reactor fuel



                  20% enrichment is also referred to as "High-assay Low-Enrichment Uranium" (HALEU). It has various benefits when used as a fuel in some reactors; see the Centrus page on HALEU.



                  Apparently, it is already in use in existing research reactors in the US, for example - after 10 tonnes of the material had been produced by the Idaho National Lab. In Iran, there's a research reactor in Tehran for which 20%-enriched Uranium could be used as fuel; and apparently, Ali Akbar Salehi, head of the nuclear program, has said that's what Iran plans to do, basically



                  According to the World Nuclear News website, many advanced reactor designs will require fuel from Uranium enriched to the 20% level. So it is quite conceivable that Iran may have planned energy-production uses for 20%-enriched Uranium.



                  I can't speak to whether it actually has working reactors, or planned reactors, which use such fuel.






                  share|improve this answer















                  Partial answer: It's usable as reactor fuel



                  20% enrichment is also referred to as "High-assay Low-Enrichment Uranium" (HALEU). It has various benefits when used as a fuel in some reactors; see the Centrus page on HALEU.



                  Apparently, it is already in use in existing research reactors in the US, for example - after 10 tonnes of the material had been produced by the Idaho National Lab. In Iran, there's a research reactor in Tehran for which 20%-enriched Uranium could be used as fuel; and apparently, Ali Akbar Salehi, head of the nuclear program, has said that's what Iran plans to do, basically



                  According to the World Nuclear News website, many advanced reactor designs will require fuel from Uranium enriched to the 20% level. So it is quite conceivable that Iran may have planned energy-production uses for 20%-enriched Uranium.



                  I can't speak to whether it actually has working reactors, or planned reactors, which use such fuel.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 4 hours ago

























                  answered 4 hours ago









                  einpoklumeinpoklum

                  2,1811033




                  2,1811033





















                      1














                      US HALEU (High-assay Low-Enrichment Uranium) reactors are intended to be fairly mobile. Basically the DOD is currently the only (US) customer. So claiming this has non-bomb uses is one thing. Claiming it has non-military uses (presently) is quite another. (Nevertheless, a HALEU reactor would be much bigger than a HEU reactor used on military naval craft.)




                      according to Dr. Everett Redmond, senior technical advisor of the NEI’s New Reactor & Advanced Technology division, the DOE’s announcement is a significant leap in the right direction because no commercial facilities to make HALEU on a commercial scale or transportation infrastructure associated with uranium hexafluoride above 5% exist worldwide.




                      On the other hand




                      Massachusetts-based fuel company Lightbridge is developing HALEU for use in commercial fuel. It has said it wants to demonstrate the fuel in a research reactor at a U.S. national laboratory in 2020, as well as a commercial nuclear power plant powering a U.S. city by 2021.




                      Also the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists doesn't find plausible (contra to the OP's own anwer) that Iran could use HALEU as fuel for their research reactor. Instead it says:




                      If Iran’s claim that it’s enriching uranium to produce fuel for its research reactor is suspect, then we must examine the possibility that Tehran is intentionally moving toward a weapons capability. Although 20 percent enrichment is legal under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, it brings Iran a step closer to producing 90 percent enriched, bomb-grade uranium.



                      A stockpile of 20 percent enriched uranium increases the breakout threat in two ways. First, by starting with 20 percent LEU–rather than the current stock of 3.5 percent–Iran cuts the time required to produce a bomb’s worth of material by more than one-half. Second, a higher degree of enrichment means that a smaller quantity of material presents a weapons threat.



                      To make a bomb’s worth of highly enriched uranium, Iran would need to start with more than 5 tons of natural uranium or about 1 ton of its 3.5 percent LEU. But if it starts enriching with 20 percent enriched uranium, it would only need 130 kilograms. (All of these numbers depend on assumptions about the amount of uranium 235 lost in the waste, which tends to be high in Iran’s operations.)




                      Also Iran has been working on and off on the HALEU for at least 6 years, when few considered HALEU commercially viable, including Iran's president:




                      What has raised the world’s suspicions is that Iran continues to produce 20 percent enriched uranium despite the fact that this exceeds its civilian needs and, as President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad acknowledged in September [2011], does not make economic sense. [...]



                      Iran’s entire uranium-enrichment program is now [2012] being devoted to producing 20 percent enriched uranium.




                      That changed with the deal, of course.




                      In case there's still doubt about the intent of this latest Iranian conditional announcement (to resume enirchment to HALEU levels), it coincides with another (conditional) annoucement to resume the work on the heavy water version of the research reactor, which is considered plan B for making weapons-grade material (plutonium in the latter case).






                      share|improve this answer





























                        1














                        US HALEU (High-assay Low-Enrichment Uranium) reactors are intended to be fairly mobile. Basically the DOD is currently the only (US) customer. So claiming this has non-bomb uses is one thing. Claiming it has non-military uses (presently) is quite another. (Nevertheless, a HALEU reactor would be much bigger than a HEU reactor used on military naval craft.)




                        according to Dr. Everett Redmond, senior technical advisor of the NEI’s New Reactor & Advanced Technology division, the DOE’s announcement is a significant leap in the right direction because no commercial facilities to make HALEU on a commercial scale or transportation infrastructure associated with uranium hexafluoride above 5% exist worldwide.




                        On the other hand




                        Massachusetts-based fuel company Lightbridge is developing HALEU for use in commercial fuel. It has said it wants to demonstrate the fuel in a research reactor at a U.S. national laboratory in 2020, as well as a commercial nuclear power plant powering a U.S. city by 2021.




                        Also the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists doesn't find plausible (contra to the OP's own anwer) that Iran could use HALEU as fuel for their research reactor. Instead it says:




                        If Iran’s claim that it’s enriching uranium to produce fuel for its research reactor is suspect, then we must examine the possibility that Tehran is intentionally moving toward a weapons capability. Although 20 percent enrichment is legal under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, it brings Iran a step closer to producing 90 percent enriched, bomb-grade uranium.



                        A stockpile of 20 percent enriched uranium increases the breakout threat in two ways. First, by starting with 20 percent LEU–rather than the current stock of 3.5 percent–Iran cuts the time required to produce a bomb’s worth of material by more than one-half. Second, a higher degree of enrichment means that a smaller quantity of material presents a weapons threat.



                        To make a bomb’s worth of highly enriched uranium, Iran would need to start with more than 5 tons of natural uranium or about 1 ton of its 3.5 percent LEU. But if it starts enriching with 20 percent enriched uranium, it would only need 130 kilograms. (All of these numbers depend on assumptions about the amount of uranium 235 lost in the waste, which tends to be high in Iran’s operations.)




                        Also Iran has been working on and off on the HALEU for at least 6 years, when few considered HALEU commercially viable, including Iran's president:




                        What has raised the world’s suspicions is that Iran continues to produce 20 percent enriched uranium despite the fact that this exceeds its civilian needs and, as President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad acknowledged in September [2011], does not make economic sense. [...]



                        Iran’s entire uranium-enrichment program is now [2012] being devoted to producing 20 percent enriched uranium.




                        That changed with the deal, of course.




                        In case there's still doubt about the intent of this latest Iranian conditional announcement (to resume enirchment to HALEU levels), it coincides with another (conditional) annoucement to resume the work on the heavy water version of the research reactor, which is considered plan B for making weapons-grade material (plutonium in the latter case).






                        share|improve this answer



























                          1












                          1








                          1







                          US HALEU (High-assay Low-Enrichment Uranium) reactors are intended to be fairly mobile. Basically the DOD is currently the only (US) customer. So claiming this has non-bomb uses is one thing. Claiming it has non-military uses (presently) is quite another. (Nevertheless, a HALEU reactor would be much bigger than a HEU reactor used on military naval craft.)




                          according to Dr. Everett Redmond, senior technical advisor of the NEI’s New Reactor & Advanced Technology division, the DOE’s announcement is a significant leap in the right direction because no commercial facilities to make HALEU on a commercial scale or transportation infrastructure associated with uranium hexafluoride above 5% exist worldwide.




                          On the other hand




                          Massachusetts-based fuel company Lightbridge is developing HALEU for use in commercial fuel. It has said it wants to demonstrate the fuel in a research reactor at a U.S. national laboratory in 2020, as well as a commercial nuclear power plant powering a U.S. city by 2021.




                          Also the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists doesn't find plausible (contra to the OP's own anwer) that Iran could use HALEU as fuel for their research reactor. Instead it says:




                          If Iran’s claim that it’s enriching uranium to produce fuel for its research reactor is suspect, then we must examine the possibility that Tehran is intentionally moving toward a weapons capability. Although 20 percent enrichment is legal under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, it brings Iran a step closer to producing 90 percent enriched, bomb-grade uranium.



                          A stockpile of 20 percent enriched uranium increases the breakout threat in two ways. First, by starting with 20 percent LEU–rather than the current stock of 3.5 percent–Iran cuts the time required to produce a bomb’s worth of material by more than one-half. Second, a higher degree of enrichment means that a smaller quantity of material presents a weapons threat.



                          To make a bomb’s worth of highly enriched uranium, Iran would need to start with more than 5 tons of natural uranium or about 1 ton of its 3.5 percent LEU. But if it starts enriching with 20 percent enriched uranium, it would only need 130 kilograms. (All of these numbers depend on assumptions about the amount of uranium 235 lost in the waste, which tends to be high in Iran’s operations.)




                          Also Iran has been working on and off on the HALEU for at least 6 years, when few considered HALEU commercially viable, including Iran's president:




                          What has raised the world’s suspicions is that Iran continues to produce 20 percent enriched uranium despite the fact that this exceeds its civilian needs and, as President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad acknowledged in September [2011], does not make economic sense. [...]



                          Iran’s entire uranium-enrichment program is now [2012] being devoted to producing 20 percent enriched uranium.




                          That changed with the deal, of course.




                          In case there's still doubt about the intent of this latest Iranian conditional announcement (to resume enirchment to HALEU levels), it coincides with another (conditional) annoucement to resume the work on the heavy water version of the research reactor, which is considered plan B for making weapons-grade material (plutonium in the latter case).






                          share|improve this answer















                          US HALEU (High-assay Low-Enrichment Uranium) reactors are intended to be fairly mobile. Basically the DOD is currently the only (US) customer. So claiming this has non-bomb uses is one thing. Claiming it has non-military uses (presently) is quite another. (Nevertheless, a HALEU reactor would be much bigger than a HEU reactor used on military naval craft.)




                          according to Dr. Everett Redmond, senior technical advisor of the NEI’s New Reactor & Advanced Technology division, the DOE’s announcement is a significant leap in the right direction because no commercial facilities to make HALEU on a commercial scale or transportation infrastructure associated with uranium hexafluoride above 5% exist worldwide.




                          On the other hand




                          Massachusetts-based fuel company Lightbridge is developing HALEU for use in commercial fuel. It has said it wants to demonstrate the fuel in a research reactor at a U.S. national laboratory in 2020, as well as a commercial nuclear power plant powering a U.S. city by 2021.




                          Also the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists doesn't find plausible (contra to the OP's own anwer) that Iran could use HALEU as fuel for their research reactor. Instead it says:




                          If Iran’s claim that it’s enriching uranium to produce fuel for its research reactor is suspect, then we must examine the possibility that Tehran is intentionally moving toward a weapons capability. Although 20 percent enrichment is legal under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, it brings Iran a step closer to producing 90 percent enriched, bomb-grade uranium.



                          A stockpile of 20 percent enriched uranium increases the breakout threat in two ways. First, by starting with 20 percent LEU–rather than the current stock of 3.5 percent–Iran cuts the time required to produce a bomb’s worth of material by more than one-half. Second, a higher degree of enrichment means that a smaller quantity of material presents a weapons threat.



                          To make a bomb’s worth of highly enriched uranium, Iran would need to start with more than 5 tons of natural uranium or about 1 ton of its 3.5 percent LEU. But if it starts enriching with 20 percent enriched uranium, it would only need 130 kilograms. (All of these numbers depend on assumptions about the amount of uranium 235 lost in the waste, which tends to be high in Iran’s operations.)




                          Also Iran has been working on and off on the HALEU for at least 6 years, when few considered HALEU commercially viable, including Iran's president:




                          What has raised the world’s suspicions is that Iran continues to produce 20 percent enriched uranium despite the fact that this exceeds its civilian needs and, as President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad acknowledged in September [2011], does not make economic sense. [...]



                          Iran’s entire uranium-enrichment program is now [2012] being devoted to producing 20 percent enriched uranium.




                          That changed with the deal, of course.




                          In case there's still doubt about the intent of this latest Iranian conditional announcement (to resume enirchment to HALEU levels), it coincides with another (conditional) annoucement to resume the work on the heavy water version of the research reactor, which is considered plan B for making weapons-grade material (plutonium in the latter case).







                          share|improve this answer














                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer








                          edited 2 hours ago

























                          answered 3 hours ago









                          FizzFizz

                          18.4k248115




                          18.4k248115



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Politics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f41343%2fare-there-non-military-uses-of-20-enriched-uranium%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                              Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                              Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її