SSD - Disk is OK, one bad sectorUpgrade disk in a HP EliteBook 8530P to SSD, how do I know what is compatible?Continuous scanning of hard disk for bad sectorsIs my SSD failing? Can it be saved if so?HDD bad sectors with OSOne Bad Sector on new HDReading bad blocks from hard disk too slow in LinuxUnable to Write Zeros to Bad Sectors/Hard Disk Not Counting Reallocated SectorsReallocate bad sector [Linux]How can I know if my Crucial 2.5 SSD can be powered with one usb2TB HDD, bad sectors in one area around 3GB, can I safely use it if partitioned beyond that defective area?
Understanding integration over Orthogonal Group
What is the best way for a skeleton to impersonate human without using magic?
Would an 8% reduction in drag outweigh the weight addition from this custom CFD-tested winglet?
Word for being out at night during curfew
Ex-manager wants to stay in touch, I don't want to
Exclude loop* snap devices from lsblk output?
Why do Thanos's punches not kill Captain America or at least cause some mortal injuries?
Who was this character from the Tomb of Annihilation adventure before they became a monster?
What's the word for the soldier salute?
Setting the major mode of a new buffer interactively
Why is this int array not passed as an object vararg array?
Do atomic orbitals "pulse" in time?
Why is “Ich wusste, dass aus dir mal was wird” grammitally correct?
How to select certain lines (n, n+4, n+8, n+12...) from the file?
How to compact two the parabol commands in the following example?
Find the cipher used
Proof that the inverse image of a single element is a discrete space
Can you book a one-way ticket to the UK on a visa?
How did Thanos not realise this had happened at the end of Endgame?
Size of a folder with du
How to slow yourself down (for playing nice with others)
Why was castling bad for white in this game, and engine strongly prefered trading queens?
iMac 27" 2017 memory upgrade question
Reaction of borax with NaOH
SSD - Disk is OK, one bad sector
Upgrade disk in a HP EliteBook 8530P to SSD, how do I know what is compatible?Continuous scanning of hard disk for bad sectorsIs my SSD failing? Can it be saved if so?HDD bad sectors with OSOne Bad Sector on new HDReading bad blocks from hard disk too slow in LinuxUnable to Write Zeros to Bad Sectors/Hard Disk Not Counting Reallocated SectorsReallocate bad sector [Linux]How can I know if my Crucial 2.5 SSD can be powered with one usb2TB HDD, bad sectors in one area around 3GB, can I safely use it if partitioned beyond that defective area?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
So, the make is Crucial MX500 2.5-INCH SSD 250GB, I bought it a half year ago and so far it works flawlessly, fine quality piece of hardware I must say.
My laptop is w/o battery and I guess sometimes I might just unplug the machine from the power network (w/o properly shutting it down, even though it takes 1 second..) and move it somewhere else.
OS - Ubuntu 18.04 LTS, I saw the above message (see title) and was wondering why is that?
On the next start of disks utility the message was gone, I read that it means that the sector was "re-allocated" or something?
Is there something wrong with the disk, is it because I am not paying too much attention on how I am using it and stuff?
P.S. How many sectors are there anyway, and is this something that would affect system performance or anything else?
laptop ssd bad-sectors
add a comment |
So, the make is Crucial MX500 2.5-INCH SSD 250GB, I bought it a half year ago and so far it works flawlessly, fine quality piece of hardware I must say.
My laptop is w/o battery and I guess sometimes I might just unplug the machine from the power network (w/o properly shutting it down, even though it takes 1 second..) and move it somewhere else.
OS - Ubuntu 18.04 LTS, I saw the above message (see title) and was wondering why is that?
On the next start of disks utility the message was gone, I read that it means that the sector was "re-allocated" or something?
Is there something wrong with the disk, is it because I am not paying too much attention on how I am using it and stuff?
P.S. How many sectors are there anyway, and is this something that would affect system performance or anything else?
laptop ssd bad-sectors
@Ramhound, ah I see.. so "hard boot/ cold boot" is also bad, not just "cold reboot" (unplugging the power cord w/o OS shut down first)? *If my understanding is correct.
– Vitaliy Terziev
3 hours ago
add a comment |
So, the make is Crucial MX500 2.5-INCH SSD 250GB, I bought it a half year ago and so far it works flawlessly, fine quality piece of hardware I must say.
My laptop is w/o battery and I guess sometimes I might just unplug the machine from the power network (w/o properly shutting it down, even though it takes 1 second..) and move it somewhere else.
OS - Ubuntu 18.04 LTS, I saw the above message (see title) and was wondering why is that?
On the next start of disks utility the message was gone, I read that it means that the sector was "re-allocated" or something?
Is there something wrong with the disk, is it because I am not paying too much attention on how I am using it and stuff?
P.S. How many sectors are there anyway, and is this something that would affect system performance or anything else?
laptop ssd bad-sectors
So, the make is Crucial MX500 2.5-INCH SSD 250GB, I bought it a half year ago and so far it works flawlessly, fine quality piece of hardware I must say.
My laptop is w/o battery and I guess sometimes I might just unplug the machine from the power network (w/o properly shutting it down, even though it takes 1 second..) and move it somewhere else.
OS - Ubuntu 18.04 LTS, I saw the above message (see title) and was wondering why is that?
On the next start of disks utility the message was gone, I read that it means that the sector was "re-allocated" or something?
Is there something wrong with the disk, is it because I am not paying too much attention on how I am using it and stuff?
P.S. How many sectors are there anyway, and is this something that would affect system performance or anything else?
laptop ssd bad-sectors
laptop ssd bad-sectors
edited 15 mins ago
fixer1234
20.2k145085
20.2k145085
asked 3 hours ago
Vitaliy TerzievVitaliy Terziev
767
767
@Ramhound, ah I see.. so "hard boot/ cold boot" is also bad, not just "cold reboot" (unplugging the power cord w/o OS shut down first)? *If my understanding is correct.
– Vitaliy Terziev
3 hours ago
add a comment |
@Ramhound, ah I see.. so "hard boot/ cold boot" is also bad, not just "cold reboot" (unplugging the power cord w/o OS shut down first)? *If my understanding is correct.
– Vitaliy Terziev
3 hours ago
@Ramhound, ah I see.. so "hard boot/ cold boot" is also bad, not just "cold reboot" (unplugging the power cord w/o OS shut down first)? *If my understanding is correct.
– Vitaliy Terziev
3 hours ago
@Ramhound, ah I see.. so "hard boot/ cold boot" is also bad, not just "cold reboot" (unplugging the power cord w/o OS shut down first)? *If my understanding is correct.
– Vitaliy Terziev
3 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
SSDs are based on blocks rather than sectors, which are associated with hard disk drives. You indicated that the message was from the Gnome Disk Utility, so that likely responds to the general error with an old message.
One bad block (or sector) doesn't mean too much. Any drive can get a failure in one or a few locations. When it happens, the drive controller tries to relocate the contents to another block (or sector). It will spend some time retrying it and moving content. That will momentarily affect performance, but you may not notice it because it will be similar to the drive just being busy.
Eventually, the drive will run out of spares and become unusable. The issue isn't so much the number of bad blocks in relation to the total number of blocks, it's the number in relation to the number of spares. Drives are provisioned with adequate spares for expected failure rates over the planned life of the drive.
In normal use, there will be an occasional random failure. The problem is when there is a recurring pattern with new bad blocks. That indicates the drive is in the process of failing an unnatural death.
So seeing that message is good from the perspective that something is keeping track of it and alerting you, so you will be aware of a problem if you start seeing the message on more than rare occasions.
Ramhound's comment about hard shutdown is a different issue. If you just pull the plug instead of shutting down gracefully, the drive may be left with corruption because write operations may not have been completed. That won't be physical damage, but you're likely to get a message either that a bad sector was detected or that there could potentially be a problem.
The operating system is aware of when the system was not shut down properly and knows to check the drive for corruption just in case there was any. Depending on the nature of the corruption, you might have a file that can't be recovered, or even a system problem if a critical file was left unusable. But recovery from that typically doesn't use up spare blocks.
Even though you aren't likely to cause physical damage with a hard shutdown, it will cause problems that are a pain in the butt. Best case, you will have a very long boot time while it checks for potential corruption. Worst case, you will lose files or need to spend time recovering system files to get operational again. So don't just pull the plug.
I see, I guess I will keep an eye on it then and see if there will be more such messages in future, I have not noticed anything in terms of performance or others. To answer your question, the application which reported it is - "gnome-disk-utility gnome disks". About: Using Disks, you can view SMART data, manage devices, benchmark physical disks, and image USB sticks.
– Vitaliy Terziev
2 hours ago
Thanks, fixer1234 for the detailed answer and for the additional clarifications around hard shutdown and the nature of my error message. I will do as suggested by you and Ramhound - will stop unplugging the cord w/o properly restarting first, keep and eye on my disks utility and use the laptop/SSD normally.
– Vitaliy Terziev
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Beyond theory, the best answer to your question, “Is there something wrong with the disk,” is we can’t tell you.
However, the best way to find out is to use the manufacturer provided tool called Storage Executive to find out the status and health of your drive. Additionally, you can perform maintenance tasks such as upgrading the firmware.
Unfortunately, this appears to only be available on Windows.
Yep, a lot of things are Windows only ignoring the fact that more and more developer and not only configurations are using Linux distributions, I'll keep an eye for other bad stuff errors and discontinue the practice of unplugging the cord while ON. Thanks for the link though, good to know that there is any.. I couldn't find it earlier with google.
– Vitaliy Terziev
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1435700%2fssd-disk-is-ok-one-bad-sector%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
SSDs are based on blocks rather than sectors, which are associated with hard disk drives. You indicated that the message was from the Gnome Disk Utility, so that likely responds to the general error with an old message.
One bad block (or sector) doesn't mean too much. Any drive can get a failure in one or a few locations. When it happens, the drive controller tries to relocate the contents to another block (or sector). It will spend some time retrying it and moving content. That will momentarily affect performance, but you may not notice it because it will be similar to the drive just being busy.
Eventually, the drive will run out of spares and become unusable. The issue isn't so much the number of bad blocks in relation to the total number of blocks, it's the number in relation to the number of spares. Drives are provisioned with adequate spares for expected failure rates over the planned life of the drive.
In normal use, there will be an occasional random failure. The problem is when there is a recurring pattern with new bad blocks. That indicates the drive is in the process of failing an unnatural death.
So seeing that message is good from the perspective that something is keeping track of it and alerting you, so you will be aware of a problem if you start seeing the message on more than rare occasions.
Ramhound's comment about hard shutdown is a different issue. If you just pull the plug instead of shutting down gracefully, the drive may be left with corruption because write operations may not have been completed. That won't be physical damage, but you're likely to get a message either that a bad sector was detected or that there could potentially be a problem.
The operating system is aware of when the system was not shut down properly and knows to check the drive for corruption just in case there was any. Depending on the nature of the corruption, you might have a file that can't be recovered, or even a system problem if a critical file was left unusable. But recovery from that typically doesn't use up spare blocks.
Even though you aren't likely to cause physical damage with a hard shutdown, it will cause problems that are a pain in the butt. Best case, you will have a very long boot time while it checks for potential corruption. Worst case, you will lose files or need to spend time recovering system files to get operational again. So don't just pull the plug.
I see, I guess I will keep an eye on it then and see if there will be more such messages in future, I have not noticed anything in terms of performance or others. To answer your question, the application which reported it is - "gnome-disk-utility gnome disks". About: Using Disks, you can view SMART data, manage devices, benchmark physical disks, and image USB sticks.
– Vitaliy Terziev
2 hours ago
Thanks, fixer1234 for the detailed answer and for the additional clarifications around hard shutdown and the nature of my error message. I will do as suggested by you and Ramhound - will stop unplugging the cord w/o properly restarting first, keep and eye on my disks utility and use the laptop/SSD normally.
– Vitaliy Terziev
1 hour ago
add a comment |
SSDs are based on blocks rather than sectors, which are associated with hard disk drives. You indicated that the message was from the Gnome Disk Utility, so that likely responds to the general error with an old message.
One bad block (or sector) doesn't mean too much. Any drive can get a failure in one or a few locations. When it happens, the drive controller tries to relocate the contents to another block (or sector). It will spend some time retrying it and moving content. That will momentarily affect performance, but you may not notice it because it will be similar to the drive just being busy.
Eventually, the drive will run out of spares and become unusable. The issue isn't so much the number of bad blocks in relation to the total number of blocks, it's the number in relation to the number of spares. Drives are provisioned with adequate spares for expected failure rates over the planned life of the drive.
In normal use, there will be an occasional random failure. The problem is when there is a recurring pattern with new bad blocks. That indicates the drive is in the process of failing an unnatural death.
So seeing that message is good from the perspective that something is keeping track of it and alerting you, so you will be aware of a problem if you start seeing the message on more than rare occasions.
Ramhound's comment about hard shutdown is a different issue. If you just pull the plug instead of shutting down gracefully, the drive may be left with corruption because write operations may not have been completed. That won't be physical damage, but you're likely to get a message either that a bad sector was detected or that there could potentially be a problem.
The operating system is aware of when the system was not shut down properly and knows to check the drive for corruption just in case there was any. Depending on the nature of the corruption, you might have a file that can't be recovered, or even a system problem if a critical file was left unusable. But recovery from that typically doesn't use up spare blocks.
Even though you aren't likely to cause physical damage with a hard shutdown, it will cause problems that are a pain in the butt. Best case, you will have a very long boot time while it checks for potential corruption. Worst case, you will lose files or need to spend time recovering system files to get operational again. So don't just pull the plug.
I see, I guess I will keep an eye on it then and see if there will be more such messages in future, I have not noticed anything in terms of performance or others. To answer your question, the application which reported it is - "gnome-disk-utility gnome disks". About: Using Disks, you can view SMART data, manage devices, benchmark physical disks, and image USB sticks.
– Vitaliy Terziev
2 hours ago
Thanks, fixer1234 for the detailed answer and for the additional clarifications around hard shutdown and the nature of my error message. I will do as suggested by you and Ramhound - will stop unplugging the cord w/o properly restarting first, keep and eye on my disks utility and use the laptop/SSD normally.
– Vitaliy Terziev
1 hour ago
add a comment |
SSDs are based on blocks rather than sectors, which are associated with hard disk drives. You indicated that the message was from the Gnome Disk Utility, so that likely responds to the general error with an old message.
One bad block (or sector) doesn't mean too much. Any drive can get a failure in one or a few locations. When it happens, the drive controller tries to relocate the contents to another block (or sector). It will spend some time retrying it and moving content. That will momentarily affect performance, but you may not notice it because it will be similar to the drive just being busy.
Eventually, the drive will run out of spares and become unusable. The issue isn't so much the number of bad blocks in relation to the total number of blocks, it's the number in relation to the number of spares. Drives are provisioned with adequate spares for expected failure rates over the planned life of the drive.
In normal use, there will be an occasional random failure. The problem is when there is a recurring pattern with new bad blocks. That indicates the drive is in the process of failing an unnatural death.
So seeing that message is good from the perspective that something is keeping track of it and alerting you, so you will be aware of a problem if you start seeing the message on more than rare occasions.
Ramhound's comment about hard shutdown is a different issue. If you just pull the plug instead of shutting down gracefully, the drive may be left with corruption because write operations may not have been completed. That won't be physical damage, but you're likely to get a message either that a bad sector was detected or that there could potentially be a problem.
The operating system is aware of when the system was not shut down properly and knows to check the drive for corruption just in case there was any. Depending on the nature of the corruption, you might have a file that can't be recovered, or even a system problem if a critical file was left unusable. But recovery from that typically doesn't use up spare blocks.
Even though you aren't likely to cause physical damage with a hard shutdown, it will cause problems that are a pain in the butt. Best case, you will have a very long boot time while it checks for potential corruption. Worst case, you will lose files or need to spend time recovering system files to get operational again. So don't just pull the plug.
SSDs are based on blocks rather than sectors, which are associated with hard disk drives. You indicated that the message was from the Gnome Disk Utility, so that likely responds to the general error with an old message.
One bad block (or sector) doesn't mean too much. Any drive can get a failure in one or a few locations. When it happens, the drive controller tries to relocate the contents to another block (or sector). It will spend some time retrying it and moving content. That will momentarily affect performance, but you may not notice it because it will be similar to the drive just being busy.
Eventually, the drive will run out of spares and become unusable. The issue isn't so much the number of bad blocks in relation to the total number of blocks, it's the number in relation to the number of spares. Drives are provisioned with adequate spares for expected failure rates over the planned life of the drive.
In normal use, there will be an occasional random failure. The problem is when there is a recurring pattern with new bad blocks. That indicates the drive is in the process of failing an unnatural death.
So seeing that message is good from the perspective that something is keeping track of it and alerting you, so you will be aware of a problem if you start seeing the message on more than rare occasions.
Ramhound's comment about hard shutdown is a different issue. If you just pull the plug instead of shutting down gracefully, the drive may be left with corruption because write operations may not have been completed. That won't be physical damage, but you're likely to get a message either that a bad sector was detected or that there could potentially be a problem.
The operating system is aware of when the system was not shut down properly and knows to check the drive for corruption just in case there was any. Depending on the nature of the corruption, you might have a file that can't be recovered, or even a system problem if a critical file was left unusable. But recovery from that typically doesn't use up spare blocks.
Even though you aren't likely to cause physical damage with a hard shutdown, it will cause problems that are a pain in the butt. Best case, you will have a very long boot time while it checks for potential corruption. Worst case, you will lose files or need to spend time recovering system files to get operational again. So don't just pull the plug.
edited 2 hours ago
answered 3 hours ago
fixer1234fixer1234
20.2k145085
20.2k145085
I see, I guess I will keep an eye on it then and see if there will be more such messages in future, I have not noticed anything in terms of performance or others. To answer your question, the application which reported it is - "gnome-disk-utility gnome disks". About: Using Disks, you can view SMART data, manage devices, benchmark physical disks, and image USB sticks.
– Vitaliy Terziev
2 hours ago
Thanks, fixer1234 for the detailed answer and for the additional clarifications around hard shutdown and the nature of my error message. I will do as suggested by you and Ramhound - will stop unplugging the cord w/o properly restarting first, keep and eye on my disks utility and use the laptop/SSD normally.
– Vitaliy Terziev
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I see, I guess I will keep an eye on it then and see if there will be more such messages in future, I have not noticed anything in terms of performance or others. To answer your question, the application which reported it is - "gnome-disk-utility gnome disks". About: Using Disks, you can view SMART data, manage devices, benchmark physical disks, and image USB sticks.
– Vitaliy Terziev
2 hours ago
Thanks, fixer1234 for the detailed answer and for the additional clarifications around hard shutdown and the nature of my error message. I will do as suggested by you and Ramhound - will stop unplugging the cord w/o properly restarting first, keep and eye on my disks utility and use the laptop/SSD normally.
– Vitaliy Terziev
1 hour ago
I see, I guess I will keep an eye on it then and see if there will be more such messages in future, I have not noticed anything in terms of performance or others. To answer your question, the application which reported it is - "gnome-disk-utility gnome disks". About: Using Disks, you can view SMART data, manage devices, benchmark physical disks, and image USB sticks.
– Vitaliy Terziev
2 hours ago
I see, I guess I will keep an eye on it then and see if there will be more such messages in future, I have not noticed anything in terms of performance or others. To answer your question, the application which reported it is - "gnome-disk-utility gnome disks". About: Using Disks, you can view SMART data, manage devices, benchmark physical disks, and image USB sticks.
– Vitaliy Terziev
2 hours ago
Thanks, fixer1234 for the detailed answer and for the additional clarifications around hard shutdown and the nature of my error message. I will do as suggested by you and Ramhound - will stop unplugging the cord w/o properly restarting first, keep and eye on my disks utility and use the laptop/SSD normally.
– Vitaliy Terziev
1 hour ago
Thanks, fixer1234 for the detailed answer and for the additional clarifications around hard shutdown and the nature of my error message. I will do as suggested by you and Ramhound - will stop unplugging the cord w/o properly restarting first, keep and eye on my disks utility and use the laptop/SSD normally.
– Vitaliy Terziev
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Beyond theory, the best answer to your question, “Is there something wrong with the disk,” is we can’t tell you.
However, the best way to find out is to use the manufacturer provided tool called Storage Executive to find out the status and health of your drive. Additionally, you can perform maintenance tasks such as upgrading the firmware.
Unfortunately, this appears to only be available on Windows.
Yep, a lot of things are Windows only ignoring the fact that more and more developer and not only configurations are using Linux distributions, I'll keep an eye for other bad stuff errors and discontinue the practice of unplugging the cord while ON. Thanks for the link though, good to know that there is any.. I couldn't find it earlier with google.
– Vitaliy Terziev
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Beyond theory, the best answer to your question, “Is there something wrong with the disk,” is we can’t tell you.
However, the best way to find out is to use the manufacturer provided tool called Storage Executive to find out the status and health of your drive. Additionally, you can perform maintenance tasks such as upgrading the firmware.
Unfortunately, this appears to only be available on Windows.
Yep, a lot of things are Windows only ignoring the fact that more and more developer and not only configurations are using Linux distributions, I'll keep an eye for other bad stuff errors and discontinue the practice of unplugging the cord while ON. Thanks for the link though, good to know that there is any.. I couldn't find it earlier with google.
– Vitaliy Terziev
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Beyond theory, the best answer to your question, “Is there something wrong with the disk,” is we can’t tell you.
However, the best way to find out is to use the manufacturer provided tool called Storage Executive to find out the status and health of your drive. Additionally, you can perform maintenance tasks such as upgrading the firmware.
Unfortunately, this appears to only be available on Windows.
Beyond theory, the best answer to your question, “Is there something wrong with the disk,” is we can’t tell you.
However, the best way to find out is to use the manufacturer provided tool called Storage Executive to find out the status and health of your drive. Additionally, you can perform maintenance tasks such as upgrading the firmware.
Unfortunately, this appears to only be available on Windows.
answered 2 hours ago
AppleoddityAppleoddity
8,07021227
8,07021227
Yep, a lot of things are Windows only ignoring the fact that more and more developer and not only configurations are using Linux distributions, I'll keep an eye for other bad stuff errors and discontinue the practice of unplugging the cord while ON. Thanks for the link though, good to know that there is any.. I couldn't find it earlier with google.
– Vitaliy Terziev
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Yep, a lot of things are Windows only ignoring the fact that more and more developer and not only configurations are using Linux distributions, I'll keep an eye for other bad stuff errors and discontinue the practice of unplugging the cord while ON. Thanks for the link though, good to know that there is any.. I couldn't find it earlier with google.
– Vitaliy Terziev
1 hour ago
Yep, a lot of things are Windows only ignoring the fact that more and more developer and not only configurations are using Linux distributions, I'll keep an eye for other bad stuff errors and discontinue the practice of unplugging the cord while ON. Thanks for the link though, good to know that there is any.. I couldn't find it earlier with google.
– Vitaliy Terziev
1 hour ago
Yep, a lot of things are Windows only ignoring the fact that more and more developer and not only configurations are using Linux distributions, I'll keep an eye for other bad stuff errors and discontinue the practice of unplugging the cord while ON. Thanks for the link though, good to know that there is any.. I couldn't find it earlier with google.
– Vitaliy Terziev
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1435700%2fssd-disk-is-ok-one-bad-sector%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
@Ramhound, ah I see.. so "hard boot/ cold boot" is also bad, not just "cold reboot" (unplugging the power cord w/o OS shut down first)? *If my understanding is correct.
– Vitaliy Terziev
3 hours ago