Does the category of finite dimensional free modules over a principal ideal domain have all finite colimits?A surjective homomorphism between finite free modules of the same rankSources on a category of ordinalsMonads on Set and their strengthFree objects in the category of dg modulesWhat does the type theory of a free-category-over-M look like?What's wrong or where is the AOC required in this proof? (free modules over a PID)Refinement of the structure theorem of finitely generated modules over a principal ideal domainWhy is $mathbb Z_p$ a free $mathbb Z$-module? Equivalently, why is $mathbb Q_p$ finite dimensional over $mathbb Q$?If ideal $I$ of domain $R$ is free $R$-module, then $I$ is principal ideal.Does the comma category of a set over category of graphs have initial and terminal objects?

Cropping a message using array splits

How can I answer high-school writing prompts without sounding weird and fake?

What are the ramifications of setting ARITHABORT ON for all connections in SQL Server?

Help decide course of action for rotting windows

Noob at soldering, can anyone explain why my circuit won't work?

Is the schwa sound consistent?

Is there any evidence to support the claim that the United States was "suckered into WW1" by Zionists, made by Benjamin Freedman in his 1961 speech?

Exception propagation: When to catch exceptions?

Can the sorting of a list be verified without comparing neighbors?

Does Lawful Interception of 4G / the proposed 5G provide a back door for hackers as well?

The lexical root of the past tense forms differs from the lexical root of the infinitive form

Is a vertical stabiliser needed for straight line flight in a glider?

Delta TSA-Precheck status removed

Is it a Munchausen Number?

Why did God specifically target the firstborn in the 10th plague (Exodus 12:29-36)?

What did Rocket give Hawkeye in "Avengers: Endgame"?

Will change of address affect direct deposit?

How to make the table in the figure in LaTeX?

Is there enough time to Planar Bind a creature conjured by a one hour duration spell?

Does a member have to be initialized to take its address?

Does the 500 feet falling cap apply per fall, or per turn?

LocalDate.plus Incorrect Answer

"Right on the tip of my tongue" meaning?

How to slow yourself down (for playing nice with others)



Does the category of finite dimensional free modules over a principal ideal domain have all finite colimits?


A surjective homomorphism between finite free modules of the same rankSources on a category of ordinalsMonads on Set and their strengthFree objects in the category of dg modulesWhat does the type theory of a free-category-over-M look like?What's wrong or where is the AOC required in this proof? (free modules over a PID)Refinement of the structure theorem of finitely generated modules over a principal ideal domainWhy is $mathbb Z_p$ a free $mathbb Z$-module? Equivalently, why is $mathbb Q_p$ finite dimensional over $mathbb Q$?If ideal $I$ of domain $R$ is free $R$-module, then $I$ is principal ideal.Does the comma category of a set over category of graphs have initial and terminal objects?













2












$begingroup$


A paper I'm reading states this fact without proof, and I can't seem to find a proof for it.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$


    A paper I'm reading states this fact without proof, and I can't seem to find a proof for it.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      A paper I'm reading states this fact without proof, and I can't seem to find a proof for it.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      A paper I'm reading states this fact without proof, and I can't seem to find a proof for it.







      category-theory free-modules






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 5 hours ago









      violetavioleta

      387210




      387210




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5












          $begingroup$

          Yes. First, the category of finitely generated modules has all finite colimits (it is closed under finite colimits in the category of all modules). But the category of finite rank free modules is a reflective subcategory: the reflector just mods out the torsion submodule (here we use the fact that any finitely generated torsion-free module is free). It follows that the category of finite rank free modules also has all finite colimits.



          Explicitly, given a finite diagram, you compute its colimit as usual in the category of modules, and then mod out the torsion submodule to get the colimit in the category of finite rank free modules. This still has the required universal property because any map to a free module will vanish on the torsion submodule.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Interesting, do you have any reference on the proof that the category of finitely generated modules has all finite colimits?
            $endgroup$
            – violeta
            4 hours ago






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            A finite colimit (in the category of all modules) of finitely generated modules is finitely generated; this follows immediately from the explicit construction of colimits as a quotient of the coproduct of all the objects in the diagram (the coproduct in this case being a finite direct sum).
            $endgroup$
            – Eric Wofsey
            4 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Oh, I see! Thanks a lot :)
            $endgroup$
            – violeta
            4 hours ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3221322%2fdoes-the-category-of-finite-dimensional-free-modules-over-a-principal-ideal-doma%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          5












          $begingroup$

          Yes. First, the category of finitely generated modules has all finite colimits (it is closed under finite colimits in the category of all modules). But the category of finite rank free modules is a reflective subcategory: the reflector just mods out the torsion submodule (here we use the fact that any finitely generated torsion-free module is free). It follows that the category of finite rank free modules also has all finite colimits.



          Explicitly, given a finite diagram, you compute its colimit as usual in the category of modules, and then mod out the torsion submodule to get the colimit in the category of finite rank free modules. This still has the required universal property because any map to a free module will vanish on the torsion submodule.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Interesting, do you have any reference on the proof that the category of finitely generated modules has all finite colimits?
            $endgroup$
            – violeta
            4 hours ago






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            A finite colimit (in the category of all modules) of finitely generated modules is finitely generated; this follows immediately from the explicit construction of colimits as a quotient of the coproduct of all the objects in the diagram (the coproduct in this case being a finite direct sum).
            $endgroup$
            – Eric Wofsey
            4 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Oh, I see! Thanks a lot :)
            $endgroup$
            – violeta
            4 hours ago















          5












          $begingroup$

          Yes. First, the category of finitely generated modules has all finite colimits (it is closed under finite colimits in the category of all modules). But the category of finite rank free modules is a reflective subcategory: the reflector just mods out the torsion submodule (here we use the fact that any finitely generated torsion-free module is free). It follows that the category of finite rank free modules also has all finite colimits.



          Explicitly, given a finite diagram, you compute its colimit as usual in the category of modules, and then mod out the torsion submodule to get the colimit in the category of finite rank free modules. This still has the required universal property because any map to a free module will vanish on the torsion submodule.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Interesting, do you have any reference on the proof that the category of finitely generated modules has all finite colimits?
            $endgroup$
            – violeta
            4 hours ago






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            A finite colimit (in the category of all modules) of finitely generated modules is finitely generated; this follows immediately from the explicit construction of colimits as a quotient of the coproduct of all the objects in the diagram (the coproduct in this case being a finite direct sum).
            $endgroup$
            – Eric Wofsey
            4 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Oh, I see! Thanks a lot :)
            $endgroup$
            – violeta
            4 hours ago













          5












          5








          5





          $begingroup$

          Yes. First, the category of finitely generated modules has all finite colimits (it is closed under finite colimits in the category of all modules). But the category of finite rank free modules is a reflective subcategory: the reflector just mods out the torsion submodule (here we use the fact that any finitely generated torsion-free module is free). It follows that the category of finite rank free modules also has all finite colimits.



          Explicitly, given a finite diagram, you compute its colimit as usual in the category of modules, and then mod out the torsion submodule to get the colimit in the category of finite rank free modules. This still has the required universal property because any map to a free module will vanish on the torsion submodule.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Yes. First, the category of finitely generated modules has all finite colimits (it is closed under finite colimits in the category of all modules). But the category of finite rank free modules is a reflective subcategory: the reflector just mods out the torsion submodule (here we use the fact that any finitely generated torsion-free module is free). It follows that the category of finite rank free modules also has all finite colimits.



          Explicitly, given a finite diagram, you compute its colimit as usual in the category of modules, and then mod out the torsion submodule to get the colimit in the category of finite rank free modules. This still has the required universal property because any map to a free module will vanish on the torsion submodule.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 4 hours ago

























          answered 5 hours ago









          Eric WofseyEric Wofsey

          196k14226357




          196k14226357











          • $begingroup$
            Interesting, do you have any reference on the proof that the category of finitely generated modules has all finite colimits?
            $endgroup$
            – violeta
            4 hours ago






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            A finite colimit (in the category of all modules) of finitely generated modules is finitely generated; this follows immediately from the explicit construction of colimits as a quotient of the coproduct of all the objects in the diagram (the coproduct in this case being a finite direct sum).
            $endgroup$
            – Eric Wofsey
            4 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Oh, I see! Thanks a lot :)
            $endgroup$
            – violeta
            4 hours ago
















          • $begingroup$
            Interesting, do you have any reference on the proof that the category of finitely generated modules has all finite colimits?
            $endgroup$
            – violeta
            4 hours ago






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            A finite colimit (in the category of all modules) of finitely generated modules is finitely generated; this follows immediately from the explicit construction of colimits as a quotient of the coproduct of all the objects in the diagram (the coproduct in this case being a finite direct sum).
            $endgroup$
            – Eric Wofsey
            4 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Oh, I see! Thanks a lot :)
            $endgroup$
            – violeta
            4 hours ago















          $begingroup$
          Interesting, do you have any reference on the proof that the category of finitely generated modules has all finite colimits?
          $endgroup$
          – violeta
          4 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Interesting, do you have any reference on the proof that the category of finitely generated modules has all finite colimits?
          $endgroup$
          – violeta
          4 hours ago




          2




          2




          $begingroup$
          A finite colimit (in the category of all modules) of finitely generated modules is finitely generated; this follows immediately from the explicit construction of colimits as a quotient of the coproduct of all the objects in the diagram (the coproduct in this case being a finite direct sum).
          $endgroup$
          – Eric Wofsey
          4 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          A finite colimit (in the category of all modules) of finitely generated modules is finitely generated; this follows immediately from the explicit construction of colimits as a quotient of the coproduct of all the objects in the diagram (the coproduct in this case being a finite direct sum).
          $endgroup$
          – Eric Wofsey
          4 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          Oh, I see! Thanks a lot :)
          $endgroup$
          – violeta
          4 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Oh, I see! Thanks a lot :)
          $endgroup$
          – violeta
          4 hours ago

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3221322%2fdoes-the-category-of-finite-dimensional-free-modules-over-a-principal-ideal-doma%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

          Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

          Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її