Determining the ideals of a quotient ring Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraShort question on notation of ideals in a quotient ring.Image of a Prime ideals in quotient ringThe number of ideals in the quotient ring $mathbb R[x]/langle x^2-3x+2 rangle$A question about a quotient ring.Form of maximal ideals in an algebraicaly closed polynomial ringFind all prime and maximal ideals of ring $mathbbZ[x,y]/langle 6, (x-2)^2, y^6rangle$.The prime ideals of a quotient ringideals of quotient ringRadical Ideal in the Coordinate Ring is Intersection of Maximal IdealsQuotient of ring of formal power series
What is the best argument for maximum parsimony method in phylogenetic tree construction?
Does the set of sets which are elements of every set exist?
Check if a string is entirely made of the same substring
Mistake in years of experience in resume?
How can I wire a 9-position switch so that each position turns on one more LED than the one before?
Israeli soda type drink
How do I check if a string is entirely made of the same substring?
Is a 5 watt UHF/VHF handheld considered QRP?
What's the difference between using dependency injection with a container and using a service locator?
Where did Arya get these scars?
Is Diceware more secure than a long passphrase?
Multiple options vs single option UI
Co-worker works way more than he should
What is a 'Key' in computer science?
Do you need a weapon for Thunderous Smite, and the other 'Smite' spells?
Array Dynamic resize in heap
What is this word supposed to be?
Are these square matrices always diagonalisable?
Dynamic Return Type
What *exactly* is electrical current, voltage, and resistance?
How would this chord from "Rocket Man" be analyzed?
Could moose/elk survive in the Amazon forest?
Is updating Emacs and installing Emacs the same thing?
A Paper Record is What I Hamper
Determining the ideals of a quotient ring
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraShort question on notation of ideals in a quotient ring.Image of a Prime ideals in quotient ringThe number of ideals in the quotient ring $mathbb R[x]/langle x^2-3x+2 rangle$A question about a quotient ring.Form of maximal ideals in an algebraicaly closed polynomial ringFind all prime and maximal ideals of ring $mathbbZ[x,y]/langle 6, (x-2)^2, y^6rangle$.The prime ideals of a quotient ringideals of quotient ringRadical Ideal in the Coordinate Ring is Intersection of Maximal IdealsQuotient of ring of formal power series
$begingroup$
Given an ideal $I = langle x^3 - xrangle subseteq mathbbR[x]$, determine the ideals in the quotient ring $Bbb R[x]/I$.
I understand that the quotient ring is of the form $k[x_1...x_n]/I$ where I is an ideal in $k[x_1...x_n]$. I also understand that the ideals of the quotient ring are in one-to-one correspondence w/ the ideals of $k[x_1...x_n]$ containing $I$.
However, I'm really confused on how to actually go about finding the ideals of the quotient ring given a specific ideal. Any hints or suggestions would be appreciated, thank you.
abstract-algebra ring-theory
New contributor
Masha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Given an ideal $I = langle x^3 - xrangle subseteq mathbbR[x]$, determine the ideals in the quotient ring $Bbb R[x]/I$.
I understand that the quotient ring is of the form $k[x_1...x_n]/I$ where I is an ideal in $k[x_1...x_n]$. I also understand that the ideals of the quotient ring are in one-to-one correspondence w/ the ideals of $k[x_1...x_n]$ containing $I$.
However, I'm really confused on how to actually go about finding the ideals of the quotient ring given a specific ideal. Any hints or suggestions would be appreciated, thank you.
abstract-algebra ring-theory
New contributor
Masha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You have just one indeterminate. There's a very useful description of all ideals of $mathbbR[x]$, because it is a principal ideal domain.
$endgroup$
– egreg
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Given an ideal $I = langle x^3 - xrangle subseteq mathbbR[x]$, determine the ideals in the quotient ring $Bbb R[x]/I$.
I understand that the quotient ring is of the form $k[x_1...x_n]/I$ where I is an ideal in $k[x_1...x_n]$. I also understand that the ideals of the quotient ring are in one-to-one correspondence w/ the ideals of $k[x_1...x_n]$ containing $I$.
However, I'm really confused on how to actually go about finding the ideals of the quotient ring given a specific ideal. Any hints or suggestions would be appreciated, thank you.
abstract-algebra ring-theory
New contributor
Masha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
Given an ideal $I = langle x^3 - xrangle subseteq mathbbR[x]$, determine the ideals in the quotient ring $Bbb R[x]/I$.
I understand that the quotient ring is of the form $k[x_1...x_n]/I$ where I is an ideal in $k[x_1...x_n]$. I also understand that the ideals of the quotient ring are in one-to-one correspondence w/ the ideals of $k[x_1...x_n]$ containing $I$.
However, I'm really confused on how to actually go about finding the ideals of the quotient ring given a specific ideal. Any hints or suggestions would be appreciated, thank you.
abstract-algebra ring-theory
abstract-algebra ring-theory
New contributor
Masha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Masha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 3 hours ago
Chinnapparaj R
6,92221030
6,92221030
New contributor
Masha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 3 hours ago
MashaMasha
262
262
New contributor
Masha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Masha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Masha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$begingroup$
You have just one indeterminate. There's a very useful description of all ideals of $mathbbR[x]$, because it is a principal ideal domain.
$endgroup$
– egreg
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You have just one indeterminate. There's a very useful description of all ideals of $mathbbR[x]$, because it is a principal ideal domain.
$endgroup$
– egreg
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
You have just one indeterminate. There's a very useful description of all ideals of $mathbbR[x]$, because it is a principal ideal domain.
$endgroup$
– egreg
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
You have just one indeterminate. There's a very useful description of all ideals of $mathbbR[x]$, because it is a principal ideal domain.
$endgroup$
– egreg
3 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Because $BbbR$ is a field, the polynomial ring $BbbR[x]$ in one indeterminate is a principal ideal domain. That means every ideal is of the form $langle frangle$ for some $finBbbR[x]$. Now use the fact that
$$langle x^3-xranglesubsetlangle frangle
qquadiffqquad
x^3-xinlangle frangle
qquadiffqquad
ftext divides x^3-x.$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Note that we can factor $x^3 - x = x(x^2 - 1) = x(x + 1)(x - 1)$. Now, by the Chinese Reimander theorem:
$$mathbb R[X]/langle x^3 - xrangle = mathbb R[X] /langle x(x + 1)(x-1) rangle = mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x-1 rangle $$
We know that:
$mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle simeq mathbb R$, since quotienting by $x$ kills all polynomials of degree 1 or higher. What's left are the reals- Similarly, $mathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle simeq mathbb R [X]/ langle x-1 rangle simeq mathbb R$.
So, the ring that we have is actually $mathbb R times mathbb R times mathbb R$.
Since $mathbb R$ is a field, it has only two idels: the zero ideal and the ring itself.
Now, note that:
- the product of ideals is an ideal of the product ring
- Every ideal of the product ring is a product of ideals
and we complete the proof, since the set of all ideals will all be:
$$
0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R
$$
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
This answer is not correct. $X^2-1$ factors as $(X-1)(X+1)$ over $mathbbR$. The Chinese Remainder Theorem therefore shows that $mathbbR[X]/langle X^3-X rangle cong mathbbR oplus mathbbR oplus mathbbR$.
$endgroup$
– Alex Wertheim
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Oh my god, right, I confused $X^2 - 1$ and $X^2 + 1$. Fixing right now!
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexWertheim I just fixed it. Could you please double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything?
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Looks mostly correct to me! (The factorization is $(X^3-X) = X(X^2-1)$, not $X(1-X^2)$. But this is a minor point, which doesn't affect the computation of the quotient up to isomorphism.
$endgroup$
– Alex Wertheim
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@AlexWertheim Argh, fixed! Thanks for catching that :)
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
1 hour ago
|
show 3 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Masha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3200710%2fdetermining-the-ideals-of-a-quotient-ring%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Because $BbbR$ is a field, the polynomial ring $BbbR[x]$ in one indeterminate is a principal ideal domain. That means every ideal is of the form $langle frangle$ for some $finBbbR[x]$. Now use the fact that
$$langle x^3-xranglesubsetlangle frangle
qquadiffqquad
x^3-xinlangle frangle
qquadiffqquad
ftext divides x^3-x.$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Because $BbbR$ is a field, the polynomial ring $BbbR[x]$ in one indeterminate is a principal ideal domain. That means every ideal is of the form $langle frangle$ for some $finBbbR[x]$. Now use the fact that
$$langle x^3-xranglesubsetlangle frangle
qquadiffqquad
x^3-xinlangle frangle
qquadiffqquad
ftext divides x^3-x.$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Because $BbbR$ is a field, the polynomial ring $BbbR[x]$ in one indeterminate is a principal ideal domain. That means every ideal is of the form $langle frangle$ for some $finBbbR[x]$. Now use the fact that
$$langle x^3-xranglesubsetlangle frangle
qquadiffqquad
x^3-xinlangle frangle
qquadiffqquad
ftext divides x^3-x.$$
$endgroup$
Because $BbbR$ is a field, the polynomial ring $BbbR[x]$ in one indeterminate is a principal ideal domain. That means every ideal is of the form $langle frangle$ for some $finBbbR[x]$. Now use the fact that
$$langle x^3-xranglesubsetlangle frangle
qquadiffqquad
x^3-xinlangle frangle
qquadiffqquad
ftext divides x^3-x.$$
answered 2 hours ago
ServaesServaes
31k342101
31k342101
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Note that we can factor $x^3 - x = x(x^2 - 1) = x(x + 1)(x - 1)$. Now, by the Chinese Reimander theorem:
$$mathbb R[X]/langle x^3 - xrangle = mathbb R[X] /langle x(x + 1)(x-1) rangle = mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x-1 rangle $$
We know that:
$mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle simeq mathbb R$, since quotienting by $x$ kills all polynomials of degree 1 or higher. What's left are the reals- Similarly, $mathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle simeq mathbb R [X]/ langle x-1 rangle simeq mathbb R$.
So, the ring that we have is actually $mathbb R times mathbb R times mathbb R$.
Since $mathbb R$ is a field, it has only two idels: the zero ideal and the ring itself.
Now, note that:
- the product of ideals is an ideal of the product ring
- Every ideal of the product ring is a product of ideals
and we complete the proof, since the set of all ideals will all be:
$$
0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R
$$
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
This answer is not correct. $X^2-1$ factors as $(X-1)(X+1)$ over $mathbbR$. The Chinese Remainder Theorem therefore shows that $mathbbR[X]/langle X^3-X rangle cong mathbbR oplus mathbbR oplus mathbbR$.
$endgroup$
– Alex Wertheim
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Oh my god, right, I confused $X^2 - 1$ and $X^2 + 1$. Fixing right now!
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexWertheim I just fixed it. Could you please double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything?
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Looks mostly correct to me! (The factorization is $(X^3-X) = X(X^2-1)$, not $X(1-X^2)$. But this is a minor point, which doesn't affect the computation of the quotient up to isomorphism.
$endgroup$
– Alex Wertheim
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@AlexWertheim Argh, fixed! Thanks for catching that :)
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
1 hour ago
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Note that we can factor $x^3 - x = x(x^2 - 1) = x(x + 1)(x - 1)$. Now, by the Chinese Reimander theorem:
$$mathbb R[X]/langle x^3 - xrangle = mathbb R[X] /langle x(x + 1)(x-1) rangle = mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x-1 rangle $$
We know that:
$mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle simeq mathbb R$, since quotienting by $x$ kills all polynomials of degree 1 or higher. What's left are the reals- Similarly, $mathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle simeq mathbb R [X]/ langle x-1 rangle simeq mathbb R$.
So, the ring that we have is actually $mathbb R times mathbb R times mathbb R$.
Since $mathbb R$ is a field, it has only two idels: the zero ideal and the ring itself.
Now, note that:
- the product of ideals is an ideal of the product ring
- Every ideal of the product ring is a product of ideals
and we complete the proof, since the set of all ideals will all be:
$$
0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R
$$
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
This answer is not correct. $X^2-1$ factors as $(X-1)(X+1)$ over $mathbbR$. The Chinese Remainder Theorem therefore shows that $mathbbR[X]/langle X^3-X rangle cong mathbbR oplus mathbbR oplus mathbbR$.
$endgroup$
– Alex Wertheim
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Oh my god, right, I confused $X^2 - 1$ and $X^2 + 1$. Fixing right now!
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexWertheim I just fixed it. Could you please double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything?
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Looks mostly correct to me! (The factorization is $(X^3-X) = X(X^2-1)$, not $X(1-X^2)$. But this is a minor point, which doesn't affect the computation of the quotient up to isomorphism.
$endgroup$
– Alex Wertheim
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@AlexWertheim Argh, fixed! Thanks for catching that :)
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
1 hour ago
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Note that we can factor $x^3 - x = x(x^2 - 1) = x(x + 1)(x - 1)$. Now, by the Chinese Reimander theorem:
$$mathbb R[X]/langle x^3 - xrangle = mathbb R[X] /langle x(x + 1)(x-1) rangle = mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x-1 rangle $$
We know that:
$mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle simeq mathbb R$, since quotienting by $x$ kills all polynomials of degree 1 or higher. What's left are the reals- Similarly, $mathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle simeq mathbb R [X]/ langle x-1 rangle simeq mathbb R$.
So, the ring that we have is actually $mathbb R times mathbb R times mathbb R$.
Since $mathbb R$ is a field, it has only two idels: the zero ideal and the ring itself.
Now, note that:
- the product of ideals is an ideal of the product ring
- Every ideal of the product ring is a product of ideals
and we complete the proof, since the set of all ideals will all be:
$$
0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R
$$
$endgroup$
Note that we can factor $x^3 - x = x(x^2 - 1) = x(x + 1)(x - 1)$. Now, by the Chinese Reimander theorem:
$$mathbb R[X]/langle x^3 - xrangle = mathbb R[X] /langle x(x + 1)(x-1) rangle = mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x-1 rangle $$
We know that:
$mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle simeq mathbb R$, since quotienting by $x$ kills all polynomials of degree 1 or higher. What's left are the reals- Similarly, $mathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle simeq mathbb R [X]/ langle x-1 rangle simeq mathbb R$.
So, the ring that we have is actually $mathbb R times mathbb R times mathbb R$.
Since $mathbb R$ is a field, it has only two idels: the zero ideal and the ring itself.
Now, note that:
- the product of ideals is an ideal of the product ring
- Every ideal of the product ring is a product of ideals
and we complete the proof, since the set of all ideals will all be:
$$
0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R
$$
edited 1 hour ago
answered 2 hours ago
Siddharth BhatSiddharth Bhat
3,3021918
3,3021918
2
$begingroup$
This answer is not correct. $X^2-1$ factors as $(X-1)(X+1)$ over $mathbbR$. The Chinese Remainder Theorem therefore shows that $mathbbR[X]/langle X^3-X rangle cong mathbbR oplus mathbbR oplus mathbbR$.
$endgroup$
– Alex Wertheim
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Oh my god, right, I confused $X^2 - 1$ and $X^2 + 1$. Fixing right now!
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexWertheim I just fixed it. Could you please double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything?
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Looks mostly correct to me! (The factorization is $(X^3-X) = X(X^2-1)$, not $X(1-X^2)$. But this is a minor point, which doesn't affect the computation of the quotient up to isomorphism.
$endgroup$
– Alex Wertheim
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@AlexWertheim Argh, fixed! Thanks for catching that :)
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
1 hour ago
|
show 3 more comments
2
$begingroup$
This answer is not correct. $X^2-1$ factors as $(X-1)(X+1)$ over $mathbbR$. The Chinese Remainder Theorem therefore shows that $mathbbR[X]/langle X^3-X rangle cong mathbbR oplus mathbbR oplus mathbbR$.
$endgroup$
– Alex Wertheim
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Oh my god, right, I confused $X^2 - 1$ and $X^2 + 1$. Fixing right now!
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexWertheim I just fixed it. Could you please double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything?
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Looks mostly correct to me! (The factorization is $(X^3-X) = X(X^2-1)$, not $X(1-X^2)$. But this is a minor point, which doesn't affect the computation of the quotient up to isomorphism.
$endgroup$
– Alex Wertheim
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@AlexWertheim Argh, fixed! Thanks for catching that :)
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
1 hour ago
2
2
$begingroup$
This answer is not correct. $X^2-1$ factors as $(X-1)(X+1)$ over $mathbbR$. The Chinese Remainder Theorem therefore shows that $mathbbR[X]/langle X^3-X rangle cong mathbbR oplus mathbbR oplus mathbbR$.
$endgroup$
– Alex Wertheim
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
This answer is not correct. $X^2-1$ factors as $(X-1)(X+1)$ over $mathbbR$. The Chinese Remainder Theorem therefore shows that $mathbbR[X]/langle X^3-X rangle cong mathbbR oplus mathbbR oplus mathbbR$.
$endgroup$
– Alex Wertheim
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Oh my god, right, I confused $X^2 - 1$ and $X^2 + 1$. Fixing right now!
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Oh my god, right, I confused $X^2 - 1$ and $X^2 + 1$. Fixing right now!
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexWertheim I just fixed it. Could you please double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything?
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@AlexWertheim I just fixed it. Could you please double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything?
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Looks mostly correct to me! (The factorization is $(X^3-X) = X(X^2-1)$, not $X(1-X^2)$. But this is a minor point, which doesn't affect the computation of the quotient up to isomorphism.
$endgroup$
– Alex Wertheim
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Looks mostly correct to me! (The factorization is $(X^3-X) = X(X^2-1)$, not $X(1-X^2)$. But this is a minor point, which doesn't affect the computation of the quotient up to isomorphism.
$endgroup$
– Alex Wertheim
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@AlexWertheim Argh, fixed! Thanks for catching that :)
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@AlexWertheim Argh, fixed! Thanks for catching that :)
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
1 hour ago
|
show 3 more comments
Masha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Masha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Masha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Masha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3200710%2fdetermining-the-ideals-of-a-quotient-ring%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
You have just one indeterminate. There's a very useful description of all ideals of $mathbbR[x]$, because it is a principal ideal domain.
$endgroup$
– egreg
3 hours ago