Determining the ideals of a quotient ring Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraShort question on notation of ideals in a quotient ring.Image of a Prime ideals in quotient ringThe number of ideals in the quotient ring $mathbb R[x]/langle x^2-3x+2 rangle$A question about a quotient ring.Form of maximal ideals in an algebraicaly closed polynomial ringFind all prime and maximal ideals of ring $mathbbZ[x,y]/langle 6, (x-2)^2, y^6rangle$.The prime ideals of a quotient ringideals of quotient ringRadical Ideal in the Coordinate Ring is Intersection of Maximal IdealsQuotient of ring of formal power series

What is the best argument for maximum parsimony method in phylogenetic tree construction?

Does the set of sets which are elements of every set exist?

Check if a string is entirely made of the same substring

Mistake in years of experience in resume?

How can I wire a 9-position switch so that each position turns on one more LED than the one before?

Israeli soda type drink

How do I check if a string is entirely made of the same substring?

Is a 5 watt UHF/VHF handheld considered QRP?

What's the difference between using dependency injection with a container and using a service locator?

Where did Arya get these scars?

Is Diceware more secure than a long passphrase?

Multiple options vs single option UI

Co-worker works way more than he should

What is a 'Key' in computer science?

Do you need a weapon for Thunderous Smite, and the other 'Smite' spells?

Array Dynamic resize in heap

What is this word supposed to be?

Are these square matrices always diagonalisable?

Dynamic Return Type

What *exactly* is electrical current, voltage, and resistance?

How would this chord from "Rocket Man" be analyzed?

Could moose/elk survive in the Amazon forest?

Is updating Emacs and installing Emacs the same thing?

A Paper Record is What I Hamper



Determining the ideals of a quotient ring



Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraShort question on notation of ideals in a quotient ring.Image of a Prime ideals in quotient ringThe number of ideals in the quotient ring $mathbb R[x]/langle x^2-3x+2 rangle$A question about a quotient ring.Form of maximal ideals in an algebraicaly closed polynomial ringFind all prime and maximal ideals of ring $mathbbZ[x,y]/langle 6, (x-2)^2, y^6rangle$.The prime ideals of a quotient ringideals of quotient ringRadical Ideal in the Coordinate Ring is Intersection of Maximal IdealsQuotient of ring of formal power series










2












$begingroup$


Given an ideal $I = langle x^3 - xrangle subseteq mathbbR[x]$, determine the ideals in the quotient ring $Bbb R[x]/I$.



I understand that the quotient ring is of the form $k[x_1...x_n]/I$ where I is an ideal in $k[x_1...x_n]$. I also understand that the ideals of the quotient ring are in one-to-one correspondence w/ the ideals of $k[x_1...x_n]$ containing $I$.



However, I'm really confused on how to actually go about finding the ideals of the quotient ring given a specific ideal. Any hints or suggestions would be appreciated, thank you.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Masha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    You have just one indeterminate. There's a very useful description of all ideals of $mathbbR[x]$, because it is a principal ideal domain.
    $endgroup$
    – egreg
    3 hours ago















2












$begingroup$


Given an ideal $I = langle x^3 - xrangle subseteq mathbbR[x]$, determine the ideals in the quotient ring $Bbb R[x]/I$.



I understand that the quotient ring is of the form $k[x_1...x_n]/I$ where I is an ideal in $k[x_1...x_n]$. I also understand that the ideals of the quotient ring are in one-to-one correspondence w/ the ideals of $k[x_1...x_n]$ containing $I$.



However, I'm really confused on how to actually go about finding the ideals of the quotient ring given a specific ideal. Any hints or suggestions would be appreciated, thank you.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Masha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    You have just one indeterminate. There's a very useful description of all ideals of $mathbbR[x]$, because it is a principal ideal domain.
    $endgroup$
    – egreg
    3 hours ago













2












2








2


1



$begingroup$


Given an ideal $I = langle x^3 - xrangle subseteq mathbbR[x]$, determine the ideals in the quotient ring $Bbb R[x]/I$.



I understand that the quotient ring is of the form $k[x_1...x_n]/I$ where I is an ideal in $k[x_1...x_n]$. I also understand that the ideals of the quotient ring are in one-to-one correspondence w/ the ideals of $k[x_1...x_n]$ containing $I$.



However, I'm really confused on how to actually go about finding the ideals of the quotient ring given a specific ideal. Any hints or suggestions would be appreciated, thank you.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Masha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




Given an ideal $I = langle x^3 - xrangle subseteq mathbbR[x]$, determine the ideals in the quotient ring $Bbb R[x]/I$.



I understand that the quotient ring is of the form $k[x_1...x_n]/I$ where I is an ideal in $k[x_1...x_n]$. I also understand that the ideals of the quotient ring are in one-to-one correspondence w/ the ideals of $k[x_1...x_n]$ containing $I$.



However, I'm really confused on how to actually go about finding the ideals of the quotient ring given a specific ideal. Any hints or suggestions would be appreciated, thank you.







abstract-algebra ring-theory






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Masha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Masha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago









Chinnapparaj R

6,92221030




6,92221030






New contributor




Masha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 3 hours ago









MashaMasha

262




262




New contributor




Masha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Masha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Masha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • $begingroup$
    You have just one indeterminate. There's a very useful description of all ideals of $mathbbR[x]$, because it is a principal ideal domain.
    $endgroup$
    – egreg
    3 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    You have just one indeterminate. There's a very useful description of all ideals of $mathbbR[x]$, because it is a principal ideal domain.
    $endgroup$
    – egreg
    3 hours ago















$begingroup$
You have just one indeterminate. There's a very useful description of all ideals of $mathbbR[x]$, because it is a principal ideal domain.
$endgroup$
– egreg
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
You have just one indeterminate. There's a very useful description of all ideals of $mathbbR[x]$, because it is a principal ideal domain.
$endgroup$
– egreg
3 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Because $BbbR$ is a field, the polynomial ring $BbbR[x]$ in one indeterminate is a principal ideal domain. That means every ideal is of the form $langle frangle$ for some $finBbbR[x]$. Now use the fact that
$$langle x^3-xranglesubsetlangle frangle
qquadiffqquad
x^3-xinlangle frangle
qquadiffqquad
ftext divides x^3-x.$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    3












    $begingroup$

    Note that we can factor $x^3 - x = x(x^2 - 1) = x(x + 1)(x - 1)$. Now, by the Chinese Reimander theorem:



    $$mathbb R[X]/langle x^3 - xrangle = mathbb R[X] /langle x(x + 1)(x-1) rangle = mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x-1 rangle $$



    We know that:




    1. $mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle simeq mathbb R$, since quotienting by $x$ kills all polynomials of degree 1 or higher. What's left are the reals

    2. Similarly, $mathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle simeq mathbb R [X]/ langle x-1 rangle simeq mathbb R$.

    So, the ring that we have is actually $mathbb R times mathbb R times mathbb R$.



    Since $mathbb R$ is a field, it has only two idels: the zero ideal and the ring itself.



    Now, note that:



    1. the product of ideals is an ideal of the product ring

    2. Every ideal of the product ring is a product of ideals

    and we complete the proof, since the set of all ideals will all be:



    $$
    0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 2




      $begingroup$
      This answer is not correct. $X^2-1$ factors as $(X-1)(X+1)$ over $mathbbR$. The Chinese Remainder Theorem therefore shows that $mathbbR[X]/langle X^3-X rangle cong mathbbR oplus mathbbR oplus mathbbR$.
      $endgroup$
      – Alex Wertheim
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Oh my god, right, I confused $X^2 - 1$ and $X^2 + 1$. Fixing right now!
      $endgroup$
      – Siddharth Bhat
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @AlexWertheim I just fixed it. Could you please double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything?
      $endgroup$
      – Siddharth Bhat
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      Looks mostly correct to me! (The factorization is $(X^3-X) = X(X^2-1)$, not $X(1-X^2)$. But this is a minor point, which doesn't affect the computation of the quotient up to isomorphism.
      $endgroup$
      – Alex Wertheim
      1 hour ago











    • $begingroup$
      @AlexWertheim Argh, fixed! Thanks for catching that :)
      $endgroup$
      – Siddharth Bhat
      1 hour ago











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Masha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3200710%2fdetermining-the-ideals-of-a-quotient-ring%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    Because $BbbR$ is a field, the polynomial ring $BbbR[x]$ in one indeterminate is a principal ideal domain. That means every ideal is of the form $langle frangle$ for some $finBbbR[x]$. Now use the fact that
    $$langle x^3-xranglesubsetlangle frangle
    qquadiffqquad
    x^3-xinlangle frangle
    qquadiffqquad
    ftext divides x^3-x.$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      3












      $begingroup$

      Because $BbbR$ is a field, the polynomial ring $BbbR[x]$ in one indeterminate is a principal ideal domain. That means every ideal is of the form $langle frangle$ for some $finBbbR[x]$. Now use the fact that
      $$langle x^3-xranglesubsetlangle frangle
      qquadiffqquad
      x^3-xinlangle frangle
      qquadiffqquad
      ftext divides x^3-x.$$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        Because $BbbR$ is a field, the polynomial ring $BbbR[x]$ in one indeterminate is a principal ideal domain. That means every ideal is of the form $langle frangle$ for some $finBbbR[x]$. Now use the fact that
        $$langle x^3-xranglesubsetlangle frangle
        qquadiffqquad
        x^3-xinlangle frangle
        qquadiffqquad
        ftext divides x^3-x.$$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Because $BbbR$ is a field, the polynomial ring $BbbR[x]$ in one indeterminate is a principal ideal domain. That means every ideal is of the form $langle frangle$ for some $finBbbR[x]$. Now use the fact that
        $$langle x^3-xranglesubsetlangle frangle
        qquadiffqquad
        x^3-xinlangle frangle
        qquadiffqquad
        ftext divides x^3-x.$$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 2 hours ago









        ServaesServaes

        31k342101




        31k342101





















            3












            $begingroup$

            Note that we can factor $x^3 - x = x(x^2 - 1) = x(x + 1)(x - 1)$. Now, by the Chinese Reimander theorem:



            $$mathbb R[X]/langle x^3 - xrangle = mathbb R[X] /langle x(x + 1)(x-1) rangle = mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x-1 rangle $$



            We know that:




            1. $mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle simeq mathbb R$, since quotienting by $x$ kills all polynomials of degree 1 or higher. What's left are the reals

            2. Similarly, $mathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle simeq mathbb R [X]/ langle x-1 rangle simeq mathbb R$.

            So, the ring that we have is actually $mathbb R times mathbb R times mathbb R$.



            Since $mathbb R$ is a field, it has only two idels: the zero ideal and the ring itself.



            Now, note that:



            1. the product of ideals is an ideal of the product ring

            2. Every ideal of the product ring is a product of ideals

            and we complete the proof, since the set of all ideals will all be:



            $$
            0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$








            • 2




              $begingroup$
              This answer is not correct. $X^2-1$ factors as $(X-1)(X+1)$ over $mathbbR$. The Chinese Remainder Theorem therefore shows that $mathbbR[X]/langle X^3-X rangle cong mathbbR oplus mathbbR oplus mathbbR$.
              $endgroup$
              – Alex Wertheim
              2 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Oh my god, right, I confused $X^2 - 1$ and $X^2 + 1$. Fixing right now!
              $endgroup$
              – Siddharth Bhat
              2 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @AlexWertheim I just fixed it. Could you please double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything?
              $endgroup$
              – Siddharth Bhat
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              Looks mostly correct to me! (The factorization is $(X^3-X) = X(X^2-1)$, not $X(1-X^2)$. But this is a minor point, which doesn't affect the computation of the quotient up to isomorphism.
              $endgroup$
              – Alex Wertheim
              1 hour ago











            • $begingroup$
              @AlexWertheim Argh, fixed! Thanks for catching that :)
              $endgroup$
              – Siddharth Bhat
              1 hour ago















            3












            $begingroup$

            Note that we can factor $x^3 - x = x(x^2 - 1) = x(x + 1)(x - 1)$. Now, by the Chinese Reimander theorem:



            $$mathbb R[X]/langle x^3 - xrangle = mathbb R[X] /langle x(x + 1)(x-1) rangle = mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x-1 rangle $$



            We know that:




            1. $mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle simeq mathbb R$, since quotienting by $x$ kills all polynomials of degree 1 or higher. What's left are the reals

            2. Similarly, $mathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle simeq mathbb R [X]/ langle x-1 rangle simeq mathbb R$.

            So, the ring that we have is actually $mathbb R times mathbb R times mathbb R$.



            Since $mathbb R$ is a field, it has only two idels: the zero ideal and the ring itself.



            Now, note that:



            1. the product of ideals is an ideal of the product ring

            2. Every ideal of the product ring is a product of ideals

            and we complete the proof, since the set of all ideals will all be:



            $$
            0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$








            • 2




              $begingroup$
              This answer is not correct. $X^2-1$ factors as $(X-1)(X+1)$ over $mathbbR$. The Chinese Remainder Theorem therefore shows that $mathbbR[X]/langle X^3-X rangle cong mathbbR oplus mathbbR oplus mathbbR$.
              $endgroup$
              – Alex Wertheim
              2 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Oh my god, right, I confused $X^2 - 1$ and $X^2 + 1$. Fixing right now!
              $endgroup$
              – Siddharth Bhat
              2 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @AlexWertheim I just fixed it. Could you please double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything?
              $endgroup$
              – Siddharth Bhat
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              Looks mostly correct to me! (The factorization is $(X^3-X) = X(X^2-1)$, not $X(1-X^2)$. But this is a minor point, which doesn't affect the computation of the quotient up to isomorphism.
              $endgroup$
              – Alex Wertheim
              1 hour ago











            • $begingroup$
              @AlexWertheim Argh, fixed! Thanks for catching that :)
              $endgroup$
              – Siddharth Bhat
              1 hour ago













            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            Note that we can factor $x^3 - x = x(x^2 - 1) = x(x + 1)(x - 1)$. Now, by the Chinese Reimander theorem:



            $$mathbb R[X]/langle x^3 - xrangle = mathbb R[X] /langle x(x + 1)(x-1) rangle = mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x-1 rangle $$



            We know that:




            1. $mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle simeq mathbb R$, since quotienting by $x$ kills all polynomials of degree 1 or higher. What's left are the reals

            2. Similarly, $mathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle simeq mathbb R [X]/ langle x-1 rangle simeq mathbb R$.

            So, the ring that we have is actually $mathbb R times mathbb R times mathbb R$.



            Since $mathbb R$ is a field, it has only two idels: the zero ideal and the ring itself.



            Now, note that:



            1. the product of ideals is an ideal of the product ring

            2. Every ideal of the product ring is a product of ideals

            and we complete the proof, since the set of all ideals will all be:



            $$
            0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Note that we can factor $x^3 - x = x(x^2 - 1) = x(x + 1)(x - 1)$. Now, by the Chinese Reimander theorem:



            $$mathbb R[X]/langle x^3 - xrangle = mathbb R[X] /langle x(x + 1)(x-1) rangle = mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x-1 rangle $$



            We know that:




            1. $mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle simeq mathbb R$, since quotienting by $x$ kills all polynomials of degree 1 or higher. What's left are the reals

            2. Similarly, $mathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle simeq mathbb R [X]/ langle x-1 rangle simeq mathbb R$.

            So, the ring that we have is actually $mathbb R times mathbb R times mathbb R$.



            Since $mathbb R$ is a field, it has only two idels: the zero ideal and the ring itself.



            Now, note that:



            1. the product of ideals is an ideal of the product ring

            2. Every ideal of the product ring is a product of ideals

            and we complete the proof, since the set of all ideals will all be:



            $$
            0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R
            $$







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 1 hour ago

























            answered 2 hours ago









            Siddharth BhatSiddharth Bhat

            3,3021918




            3,3021918







            • 2




              $begingroup$
              This answer is not correct. $X^2-1$ factors as $(X-1)(X+1)$ over $mathbbR$. The Chinese Remainder Theorem therefore shows that $mathbbR[X]/langle X^3-X rangle cong mathbbR oplus mathbbR oplus mathbbR$.
              $endgroup$
              – Alex Wertheim
              2 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Oh my god, right, I confused $X^2 - 1$ and $X^2 + 1$. Fixing right now!
              $endgroup$
              – Siddharth Bhat
              2 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @AlexWertheim I just fixed it. Could you please double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything?
              $endgroup$
              – Siddharth Bhat
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              Looks mostly correct to me! (The factorization is $(X^3-X) = X(X^2-1)$, not $X(1-X^2)$. But this is a minor point, which doesn't affect the computation of the quotient up to isomorphism.
              $endgroup$
              – Alex Wertheim
              1 hour ago











            • $begingroup$
              @AlexWertheim Argh, fixed! Thanks for catching that :)
              $endgroup$
              – Siddharth Bhat
              1 hour ago












            • 2




              $begingroup$
              This answer is not correct. $X^2-1$ factors as $(X-1)(X+1)$ over $mathbbR$. The Chinese Remainder Theorem therefore shows that $mathbbR[X]/langle X^3-X rangle cong mathbbR oplus mathbbR oplus mathbbR$.
              $endgroup$
              – Alex Wertheim
              2 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Oh my god, right, I confused $X^2 - 1$ and $X^2 + 1$. Fixing right now!
              $endgroup$
              – Siddharth Bhat
              2 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @AlexWertheim I just fixed it. Could you please double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything?
              $endgroup$
              – Siddharth Bhat
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              Looks mostly correct to me! (The factorization is $(X^3-X) = X(X^2-1)$, not $X(1-X^2)$. But this is a minor point, which doesn't affect the computation of the quotient up to isomorphism.
              $endgroup$
              – Alex Wertheim
              1 hour ago











            • $begingroup$
              @AlexWertheim Argh, fixed! Thanks for catching that :)
              $endgroup$
              – Siddharth Bhat
              1 hour ago







            2




            2




            $begingroup$
            This answer is not correct. $X^2-1$ factors as $(X-1)(X+1)$ over $mathbbR$. The Chinese Remainder Theorem therefore shows that $mathbbR[X]/langle X^3-X rangle cong mathbbR oplus mathbbR oplus mathbbR$.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex Wertheim
            2 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            This answer is not correct. $X^2-1$ factors as $(X-1)(X+1)$ over $mathbbR$. The Chinese Remainder Theorem therefore shows that $mathbbR[X]/langle X^3-X rangle cong mathbbR oplus mathbbR oplus mathbbR$.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex Wertheim
            2 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            Oh my god, right, I confused $X^2 - 1$ and $X^2 + 1$. Fixing right now!
            $endgroup$
            – Siddharth Bhat
            2 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            Oh my god, right, I confused $X^2 - 1$ and $X^2 + 1$. Fixing right now!
            $endgroup$
            – Siddharth Bhat
            2 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            @AlexWertheim I just fixed it. Could you please double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything?
            $endgroup$
            – Siddharth Bhat
            1 hour ago




            $begingroup$
            @AlexWertheim I just fixed it. Could you please double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything?
            $endgroup$
            – Siddharth Bhat
            1 hour ago












            $begingroup$
            Looks mostly correct to me! (The factorization is $(X^3-X) = X(X^2-1)$, not $X(1-X^2)$. But this is a minor point, which doesn't affect the computation of the quotient up to isomorphism.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex Wertheim
            1 hour ago





            $begingroup$
            Looks mostly correct to me! (The factorization is $(X^3-X) = X(X^2-1)$, not $X(1-X^2)$. But this is a minor point, which doesn't affect the computation of the quotient up to isomorphism.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex Wertheim
            1 hour ago













            $begingroup$
            @AlexWertheim Argh, fixed! Thanks for catching that :)
            $endgroup$
            – Siddharth Bhat
            1 hour ago




            $begingroup$
            @AlexWertheim Argh, fixed! Thanks for catching that :)
            $endgroup$
            – Siddharth Bhat
            1 hour ago










            Masha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Masha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Masha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Masha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3200710%2fdetermining-the-ideals-of-a-quotient-ring%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            In Tikz, how to set a node's label alignment to the left?Rotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?Numerical conditional within tikz keys?TikZ/ERD: node (=Entity) label on the insideLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themVertically align a tikzpicture and forestDrawing tikz line in the margin for multiple pagesLongtable, contained tikz, padding, custom columns, and an alignment issueTikZ: define arrow starting position based on style and format node labelAlign node name in Tikz