Flash for group photos near wall Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Proposal: Rules for *New* Photo Contest on Main SiteWhat is the inverse-square law, and how does it apply to lighting for photography?How to take photos of large groups (over 100 people)?How to meter for manual bounce flash?What is the smallest option for a flash that can also bounce?How to avoid shadows under the eyes when using bounce flash?Can I get a high quality image from a rostrum mounted camera and bounce flash?Capturing the full effect of iridescent/“holo” nail polishWhy are some photos gray and dark in my lightbox?How can I avoid reflections in windows when using flash?How can I avoid dark horizontal lines (stripes or bands) with LED lighting?Lighting the inside of an incubator
Married in secret, can marital status in passport be changed at a later date?
Are all CP/M-80 implementations binary compatible?
How to translate "red flag" into Spanish?
Could moose/elk survive in the Amazon forest?
What is the ongoing value of the Kanban board to the developers as opposed to management
Is there any hidden 'W' sound after 'comment' in : Comment est-elle?
How would I use different systems of magic when they are capable of the same effects?
Does the set of sets which are elements of every set exist?
Flash for group photos near wall
How to open locks without disable device?
Why is this method for solving linear equations systems using determinants works?
What was Apollo 13's "Little Jolt" after MECO?
Map material from china not allowed to leave the country
"Rubric" as meaning "signature" or "personal mark" -- is this accepted usage?
Has a Nobel Peace laureate ever been accused of war crimes?
Would reducing the reference voltage of an ADC have any effect on accuracy?
What is /etc/mtab in Linux?
Does Feeblemind produce an ongoing magical effect that can be dispelled?
Does Mathematica have an implementation of the Poisson Binomial Distribution?
SQL Query not selecting all points that it should?
Why did Israel vote against lifting the American embargo on Cuba?
What do you call the part of a novel that is not dialog?
PIC mathematical operations weird problem
How to count in linear time worst-case?
Flash for group photos near wall
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Proposal: Rules for *New* Photo Contest on Main SiteWhat is the inverse-square law, and how does it apply to lighting for photography?How to take photos of large groups (over 100 people)?How to meter for manual bounce flash?What is the smallest option for a flash that can also bounce?How to avoid shadows under the eyes when using bounce flash?Can I get a high quality image from a rostrum mounted camera and bounce flash?Capturing the full effect of iridescent/“holo” nail polishWhy are some photos gray and dark in my lightbox?How can I avoid reflections in windows when using flash?How can I avoid dark horizontal lines (stripes or bands) with LED lighting?Lighting the inside of an incubator
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I'm having trouble geting nice even lighting when using my speelight on my camera. I photographed a formal recently in a hall with high yellowish callings. I pointed the speelight directly upwards at the ceiling to diffuse the light. However in many of my photos, especially those near walls, the light would be very bright near the top and dim near the bottom. What could I do to avoid this? Example photo below. Thanks
flash lighting bounce-flash
New contributor
add a comment |
I'm having trouble geting nice even lighting when using my speelight on my camera. I photographed a formal recently in a hall with high yellowish callings. I pointed the speelight directly upwards at the ceiling to diffuse the light. However in many of my photos, especially those near walls, the light would be very bright near the top and dim near the bottom. What could I do to avoid this? Example photo below. Thanks
flash lighting bounce-flash
New contributor
add a comment |
I'm having trouble geting nice even lighting when using my speelight on my camera. I photographed a formal recently in a hall with high yellowish callings. I pointed the speelight directly upwards at the ceiling to diffuse the light. However in many of my photos, especially those near walls, the light would be very bright near the top and dim near the bottom. What could I do to avoid this? Example photo below. Thanks
flash lighting bounce-flash
New contributor
I'm having trouble geting nice even lighting when using my speelight on my camera. I photographed a formal recently in a hall with high yellowish callings. I pointed the speelight directly upwards at the ceiling to diffuse the light. However in many of my photos, especially those near walls, the light would be very bright near the top and dim near the bottom. What could I do to avoid this? Example photo below. Thanks
flash lighting bounce-flash
flash lighting bounce-flash
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 3 hours ago
Geoff Shaw PhotographyGeoff Shaw Photography
111
111
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
You need to think about the direction of the light when you bounce.
Bouncing isn't just about pointing the flash up, or up and forward. It's about picking the direction of your light. If you're bouncing, you have to stop thinking of the flash as your light source, and think of the reflecting surface your flash is pointed at as your light source. In other words, point the head of the flash at where you'd put a softbox in a studio. In this specific case, you put the light in the ceiling, straight over your head, more or less pointing downwards.
If you want the light to come from the front more, you need to bounce behind you. But there may not be a reflective surface (wall) there. So, choosing where in the room you do this, and how the room is shaped / how far away the walls/ceiling are all key. The higher the ceiling, the less liable you'll be able to bounce, because light, like all forms of electromagnetic energy, falls of according to inverse square. Double the distance, you quarter the light. Triple it, and you've only got one-ninth. There are reasons to still use a high ISO setting, even if you use a flash.
You may need to set up a reflector or reflective surface, or rearrange where the group is standing, so you can use a bounce surface. Or. Consider taking that flash off camera, and remotely triggering it somehow (most commonly, with a radio transmitter/receiver).
add a comment |
In addition to what xiota suggests, you need to consider how the inverse square law applies here (What is the inverse-square law, and how does it apply to lighting for photography?).
If you were forced to only bounce the light off the ceiling, then to even out the exposure from top to bottom, you'd need to increase the total distance the light has to travel so that the difference between light path to top and light path to bottom are ratios that are closer together. This is often hard to control, as you can't adjust the ceiling height and often have little working room for which to move back - and the solution of decoupling the flash from the camera to move it further behind you, for example, actually opens the door to better lighting methods.
If you can get the flash off the camera - this would be the most ideal as you have more control over where the strobe sits relative to the subject and any sort of modifiers you want to use to soften the light.
If you cannot decouple the flash from the camera, then your next best option is to direct some of the light forward so that it can fill in where the main light path has started to fall-off. This is done by extending the bounce card up (if your flash has one), adding a home-made bounce card, or using a light modifier that throws the light in all directions (something like a Magmod of Fonger)
Thought I'd typed about the bounce card, but guess forgot.
– xiota
44 mins ago
add a comment |
In addition to the light falloff across the frame, there are some light-dark bands, possibly caused by flickering artificial lights?
Options to consider:
Reduce shutter speed or use sync settings on camera to eliminate banding.
Use diffuser in addition to bouce.
- Use the bounce card on your flash.
- Change the angle of bounce. (See inkista's answer.)
- Try bouncing off nearby walls.
- Bounce off a reflector, held by assistant or stand.
- Umbrellas and soft boxes?
- Off camera flash (See Hueco's answer.)
The problem should be fairly easy to fix with post processing.
- Create layer with black to white gradient matching the change in light levels. You can even grab, expand, blur, invert, and desaturate a section of the wall. Using a portion of the wall will help reduce the appearance of the bands. You will need to clone out the logos.
- Find an appropriate layer blending mode. (I used overlay.)
- Change opacity to taste. (I used 35%.)
- Touch up with dodge and burn. (I skipped this, so banding is still visible.)
There are more complicated methods, but the basic idea of using layer blending modes is the same.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "61"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Geoff Shaw Photography is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f107809%2fflash-for-group-photos-near-wall%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You need to think about the direction of the light when you bounce.
Bouncing isn't just about pointing the flash up, or up and forward. It's about picking the direction of your light. If you're bouncing, you have to stop thinking of the flash as your light source, and think of the reflecting surface your flash is pointed at as your light source. In other words, point the head of the flash at where you'd put a softbox in a studio. In this specific case, you put the light in the ceiling, straight over your head, more or less pointing downwards.
If you want the light to come from the front more, you need to bounce behind you. But there may not be a reflective surface (wall) there. So, choosing where in the room you do this, and how the room is shaped / how far away the walls/ceiling are all key. The higher the ceiling, the less liable you'll be able to bounce, because light, like all forms of electromagnetic energy, falls of according to inverse square. Double the distance, you quarter the light. Triple it, and you've only got one-ninth. There are reasons to still use a high ISO setting, even if you use a flash.
You may need to set up a reflector or reflective surface, or rearrange where the group is standing, so you can use a bounce surface. Or. Consider taking that flash off camera, and remotely triggering it somehow (most commonly, with a radio transmitter/receiver).
add a comment |
You need to think about the direction of the light when you bounce.
Bouncing isn't just about pointing the flash up, or up and forward. It's about picking the direction of your light. If you're bouncing, you have to stop thinking of the flash as your light source, and think of the reflecting surface your flash is pointed at as your light source. In other words, point the head of the flash at where you'd put a softbox in a studio. In this specific case, you put the light in the ceiling, straight over your head, more or less pointing downwards.
If you want the light to come from the front more, you need to bounce behind you. But there may not be a reflective surface (wall) there. So, choosing where in the room you do this, and how the room is shaped / how far away the walls/ceiling are all key. The higher the ceiling, the less liable you'll be able to bounce, because light, like all forms of electromagnetic energy, falls of according to inverse square. Double the distance, you quarter the light. Triple it, and you've only got one-ninth. There are reasons to still use a high ISO setting, even if you use a flash.
You may need to set up a reflector or reflective surface, or rearrange where the group is standing, so you can use a bounce surface. Or. Consider taking that flash off camera, and remotely triggering it somehow (most commonly, with a radio transmitter/receiver).
add a comment |
You need to think about the direction of the light when you bounce.
Bouncing isn't just about pointing the flash up, or up and forward. It's about picking the direction of your light. If you're bouncing, you have to stop thinking of the flash as your light source, and think of the reflecting surface your flash is pointed at as your light source. In other words, point the head of the flash at where you'd put a softbox in a studio. In this specific case, you put the light in the ceiling, straight over your head, more or less pointing downwards.
If you want the light to come from the front more, you need to bounce behind you. But there may not be a reflective surface (wall) there. So, choosing where in the room you do this, and how the room is shaped / how far away the walls/ceiling are all key. The higher the ceiling, the less liable you'll be able to bounce, because light, like all forms of electromagnetic energy, falls of according to inverse square. Double the distance, you quarter the light. Triple it, and you've only got one-ninth. There are reasons to still use a high ISO setting, even if you use a flash.
You may need to set up a reflector or reflective surface, or rearrange where the group is standing, so you can use a bounce surface. Or. Consider taking that flash off camera, and remotely triggering it somehow (most commonly, with a radio transmitter/receiver).
You need to think about the direction of the light when you bounce.
Bouncing isn't just about pointing the flash up, or up and forward. It's about picking the direction of your light. If you're bouncing, you have to stop thinking of the flash as your light source, and think of the reflecting surface your flash is pointed at as your light source. In other words, point the head of the flash at where you'd put a softbox in a studio. In this specific case, you put the light in the ceiling, straight over your head, more or less pointing downwards.
If you want the light to come from the front more, you need to bounce behind you. But there may not be a reflective surface (wall) there. So, choosing where in the room you do this, and how the room is shaped / how far away the walls/ceiling are all key. The higher the ceiling, the less liable you'll be able to bounce, because light, like all forms of electromagnetic energy, falls of according to inverse square. Double the distance, you quarter the light. Triple it, and you've only got one-ninth. There are reasons to still use a high ISO setting, even if you use a flash.
You may need to set up a reflector or reflective surface, or rearrange where the group is standing, so you can use a bounce surface. Or. Consider taking that flash off camera, and remotely triggering it somehow (most commonly, with a radio transmitter/receiver).
answered 58 mins ago
inkistainkista
41.3k562107
41.3k562107
add a comment |
add a comment |
In addition to what xiota suggests, you need to consider how the inverse square law applies here (What is the inverse-square law, and how does it apply to lighting for photography?).
If you were forced to only bounce the light off the ceiling, then to even out the exposure from top to bottom, you'd need to increase the total distance the light has to travel so that the difference between light path to top and light path to bottom are ratios that are closer together. This is often hard to control, as you can't adjust the ceiling height and often have little working room for which to move back - and the solution of decoupling the flash from the camera to move it further behind you, for example, actually opens the door to better lighting methods.
If you can get the flash off the camera - this would be the most ideal as you have more control over where the strobe sits relative to the subject and any sort of modifiers you want to use to soften the light.
If you cannot decouple the flash from the camera, then your next best option is to direct some of the light forward so that it can fill in where the main light path has started to fall-off. This is done by extending the bounce card up (if your flash has one), adding a home-made bounce card, or using a light modifier that throws the light in all directions (something like a Magmod of Fonger)
Thought I'd typed about the bounce card, but guess forgot.
– xiota
44 mins ago
add a comment |
In addition to what xiota suggests, you need to consider how the inverse square law applies here (What is the inverse-square law, and how does it apply to lighting for photography?).
If you were forced to only bounce the light off the ceiling, then to even out the exposure from top to bottom, you'd need to increase the total distance the light has to travel so that the difference between light path to top and light path to bottom are ratios that are closer together. This is often hard to control, as you can't adjust the ceiling height and often have little working room for which to move back - and the solution of decoupling the flash from the camera to move it further behind you, for example, actually opens the door to better lighting methods.
If you can get the flash off the camera - this would be the most ideal as you have more control over where the strobe sits relative to the subject and any sort of modifiers you want to use to soften the light.
If you cannot decouple the flash from the camera, then your next best option is to direct some of the light forward so that it can fill in where the main light path has started to fall-off. This is done by extending the bounce card up (if your flash has one), adding a home-made bounce card, or using a light modifier that throws the light in all directions (something like a Magmod of Fonger)
Thought I'd typed about the bounce card, but guess forgot.
– xiota
44 mins ago
add a comment |
In addition to what xiota suggests, you need to consider how the inverse square law applies here (What is the inverse-square law, and how does it apply to lighting for photography?).
If you were forced to only bounce the light off the ceiling, then to even out the exposure from top to bottom, you'd need to increase the total distance the light has to travel so that the difference between light path to top and light path to bottom are ratios that are closer together. This is often hard to control, as you can't adjust the ceiling height and often have little working room for which to move back - and the solution of decoupling the flash from the camera to move it further behind you, for example, actually opens the door to better lighting methods.
If you can get the flash off the camera - this would be the most ideal as you have more control over where the strobe sits relative to the subject and any sort of modifiers you want to use to soften the light.
If you cannot decouple the flash from the camera, then your next best option is to direct some of the light forward so that it can fill in where the main light path has started to fall-off. This is done by extending the bounce card up (if your flash has one), adding a home-made bounce card, or using a light modifier that throws the light in all directions (something like a Magmod of Fonger)
In addition to what xiota suggests, you need to consider how the inverse square law applies here (What is the inverse-square law, and how does it apply to lighting for photography?).
If you were forced to only bounce the light off the ceiling, then to even out the exposure from top to bottom, you'd need to increase the total distance the light has to travel so that the difference between light path to top and light path to bottom are ratios that are closer together. This is often hard to control, as you can't adjust the ceiling height and often have little working room for which to move back - and the solution of decoupling the flash from the camera to move it further behind you, for example, actually opens the door to better lighting methods.
If you can get the flash off the camera - this would be the most ideal as you have more control over where the strobe sits relative to the subject and any sort of modifiers you want to use to soften the light.
If you cannot decouple the flash from the camera, then your next best option is to direct some of the light forward so that it can fill in where the main light path has started to fall-off. This is done by extending the bounce card up (if your flash has one), adding a home-made bounce card, or using a light modifier that throws the light in all directions (something like a Magmod of Fonger)
answered 2 hours ago
HuecoHueco
12.6k32858
12.6k32858
Thought I'd typed about the bounce card, but guess forgot.
– xiota
44 mins ago
add a comment |
Thought I'd typed about the bounce card, but guess forgot.
– xiota
44 mins ago
Thought I'd typed about the bounce card, but guess forgot.
– xiota
44 mins ago
Thought I'd typed about the bounce card, but guess forgot.
– xiota
44 mins ago
add a comment |
In addition to the light falloff across the frame, there are some light-dark bands, possibly caused by flickering artificial lights?
Options to consider:
Reduce shutter speed or use sync settings on camera to eliminate banding.
Use diffuser in addition to bouce.
- Use the bounce card on your flash.
- Change the angle of bounce. (See inkista's answer.)
- Try bouncing off nearby walls.
- Bounce off a reflector, held by assistant or stand.
- Umbrellas and soft boxes?
- Off camera flash (See Hueco's answer.)
The problem should be fairly easy to fix with post processing.
- Create layer with black to white gradient matching the change in light levels. You can even grab, expand, blur, invert, and desaturate a section of the wall. Using a portion of the wall will help reduce the appearance of the bands. You will need to clone out the logos.
- Find an appropriate layer blending mode. (I used overlay.)
- Change opacity to taste. (I used 35%.)
- Touch up with dodge and burn. (I skipped this, so banding is still visible.)
There are more complicated methods, but the basic idea of using layer blending modes is the same.
add a comment |
In addition to the light falloff across the frame, there are some light-dark bands, possibly caused by flickering artificial lights?
Options to consider:
Reduce shutter speed or use sync settings on camera to eliminate banding.
Use diffuser in addition to bouce.
- Use the bounce card on your flash.
- Change the angle of bounce. (See inkista's answer.)
- Try bouncing off nearby walls.
- Bounce off a reflector, held by assistant or stand.
- Umbrellas and soft boxes?
- Off camera flash (See Hueco's answer.)
The problem should be fairly easy to fix with post processing.
- Create layer with black to white gradient matching the change in light levels. You can even grab, expand, blur, invert, and desaturate a section of the wall. Using a portion of the wall will help reduce the appearance of the bands. You will need to clone out the logos.
- Find an appropriate layer blending mode. (I used overlay.)
- Change opacity to taste. (I used 35%.)
- Touch up with dodge and burn. (I skipped this, so banding is still visible.)
There are more complicated methods, but the basic idea of using layer blending modes is the same.
add a comment |
In addition to the light falloff across the frame, there are some light-dark bands, possibly caused by flickering artificial lights?
Options to consider:
Reduce shutter speed or use sync settings on camera to eliminate banding.
Use diffuser in addition to bouce.
- Use the bounce card on your flash.
- Change the angle of bounce. (See inkista's answer.)
- Try bouncing off nearby walls.
- Bounce off a reflector, held by assistant or stand.
- Umbrellas and soft boxes?
- Off camera flash (See Hueco's answer.)
The problem should be fairly easy to fix with post processing.
- Create layer with black to white gradient matching the change in light levels. You can even grab, expand, blur, invert, and desaturate a section of the wall. Using a portion of the wall will help reduce the appearance of the bands. You will need to clone out the logos.
- Find an appropriate layer blending mode. (I used overlay.)
- Change opacity to taste. (I used 35%.)
- Touch up with dodge and burn. (I skipped this, so banding is still visible.)
There are more complicated methods, but the basic idea of using layer blending modes is the same.
In addition to the light falloff across the frame, there are some light-dark bands, possibly caused by flickering artificial lights?
Options to consider:
Reduce shutter speed or use sync settings on camera to eliminate banding.
Use diffuser in addition to bouce.
- Use the bounce card on your flash.
- Change the angle of bounce. (See inkista's answer.)
- Try bouncing off nearby walls.
- Bounce off a reflector, held by assistant or stand.
- Umbrellas and soft boxes?
- Off camera flash (See Hueco's answer.)
The problem should be fairly easy to fix with post processing.
- Create layer with black to white gradient matching the change in light levels. You can even grab, expand, blur, invert, and desaturate a section of the wall. Using a portion of the wall will help reduce the appearance of the bands. You will need to clone out the logos.
- Find an appropriate layer blending mode. (I used overlay.)
- Change opacity to taste. (I used 35%.)
- Touch up with dodge and burn. (I skipped this, so banding is still visible.)
There are more complicated methods, but the basic idea of using layer blending modes is the same.
edited 5 mins ago
answered 3 hours ago
xiotaxiota
12.3k41864
12.3k41864
add a comment |
add a comment |
Geoff Shaw Photography is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Geoff Shaw Photography is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Geoff Shaw Photography is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Geoff Shaw Photography is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Photography Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f107809%2fflash-for-group-photos-near-wall%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown