Flash for group photos near wall Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Proposal: Rules for *New* Photo Contest on Main SiteWhat is the inverse-square law, and how does it apply to lighting for photography?How to take photos of large groups (over 100 people)?How to meter for manual bounce flash?What is the smallest option for a flash that can also bounce?How to avoid shadows under the eyes when using bounce flash?Can I get a high quality image from a rostrum mounted camera and bounce flash?Capturing the full effect of iridescent/“holo” nail polishWhy are some photos gray and dark in my lightbox?How can I avoid reflections in windows when using flash?How can I avoid dark horizontal lines (stripes or bands) with LED lighting?Lighting the inside of an incubator

Married in secret, can marital status in passport be changed at a later date?

Are all CP/M-80 implementations binary compatible?

How to translate "red flag" into Spanish?

Could moose/elk survive in the Amazon forest?

What is the ongoing value of the Kanban board to the developers as opposed to management

Is there any hidden 'W' sound after 'comment' in : Comment est-elle?

How would I use different systems of magic when they are capable of the same effects?

Does the set of sets which are elements of every set exist?

Flash for group photos near wall

How to open locks without disable device?

Why is this method for solving linear equations systems using determinants works?

What was Apollo 13's "Little Jolt" after MECO?

Map material from china not allowed to leave the country

"Rubric" as meaning "signature" or "personal mark" -- is this accepted usage?

Has a Nobel Peace laureate ever been accused of war crimes?

Would reducing the reference voltage of an ADC have any effect on accuracy?

What is /etc/mtab in Linux?

Does Feeblemind produce an ongoing magical effect that can be dispelled?

Does Mathematica have an implementation of the Poisson Binomial Distribution?

SQL Query not selecting all points that it should?

Why did Israel vote against lifting the American embargo on Cuba?

What do you call the part of a novel that is not dialog?

PIC mathematical operations weird problem

How to count in linear time worst-case?



Flash for group photos near wall



Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Proposal: Rules for *New* Photo Contest on Main SiteWhat is the inverse-square law, and how does it apply to lighting for photography?How to take photos of large groups (over 100 people)?How to meter for manual bounce flash?What is the smallest option for a flash that can also bounce?How to avoid shadows under the eyes when using bounce flash?Can I get a high quality image from a rostrum mounted camera and bounce flash?Capturing the full effect of iridescent/“holo” nail polishWhy are some photos gray and dark in my lightbox?How can I avoid reflections in windows when using flash?How can I avoid dark horizontal lines (stripes or bands) with LED lighting?Lighting the inside of an incubator



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2















I'm having trouble geting nice even lighting when using my speelight on my camera. I photographed a formal recently in a hall with high yellowish callings. I pointed the speelight directly upwards at the ceiling to diffuse the light. However in many of my photos, especially those near walls, the light would be very bright near the top and dim near the bottom. What could I do to avoid this? Example photo below. Thanks
Group photo










share|improve this question







New contributor




Geoff Shaw Photography is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


























    2















    I'm having trouble geting nice even lighting when using my speelight on my camera. I photographed a formal recently in a hall with high yellowish callings. I pointed the speelight directly upwards at the ceiling to diffuse the light. However in many of my photos, especially those near walls, the light would be very bright near the top and dim near the bottom. What could I do to avoid this? Example photo below. Thanks
    Group photo










    share|improve this question







    New contributor




    Geoff Shaw Photography is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      2












      2








      2








      I'm having trouble geting nice even lighting when using my speelight on my camera. I photographed a formal recently in a hall with high yellowish callings. I pointed the speelight directly upwards at the ceiling to diffuse the light. However in many of my photos, especially those near walls, the light would be very bright near the top and dim near the bottom. What could I do to avoid this? Example photo below. Thanks
      Group photo










      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Geoff Shaw Photography is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      I'm having trouble geting nice even lighting when using my speelight on my camera. I photographed a formal recently in a hall with high yellowish callings. I pointed the speelight directly upwards at the ceiling to diffuse the light. However in many of my photos, especially those near walls, the light would be very bright near the top and dim near the bottom. What could I do to avoid this? Example photo below. Thanks
      Group photo







      flash lighting bounce-flash






      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Geoff Shaw Photography is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Geoff Shaw Photography is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question






      New contributor




      Geoff Shaw Photography is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 3 hours ago









      Geoff Shaw PhotographyGeoff Shaw Photography

      111




      111




      New contributor




      Geoff Shaw Photography is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Geoff Shaw Photography is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Geoff Shaw Photography is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          You need to think about the direction of the light when you bounce.



          Bouncing isn't just about pointing the flash up, or up and forward. It's about picking the direction of your light. If you're bouncing, you have to stop thinking of the flash as your light source, and think of the reflecting surface your flash is pointed at as your light source. In other words, point the head of the flash at where you'd put a softbox in a studio. In this specific case, you put the light in the ceiling, straight over your head, more or less pointing downwards.



          If you want the light to come from the front more, you need to bounce behind you. But there may not be a reflective surface (wall) there. So, choosing where in the room you do this, and how the room is shaped / how far away the walls/ceiling are all key. The higher the ceiling, the less liable you'll be able to bounce, because light, like all forms of electromagnetic energy, falls of according to inverse square. Double the distance, you quarter the light. Triple it, and you've only got one-ninth. There are reasons to still use a high ISO setting, even if you use a flash.



          You may need to set up a reflector or reflective surface, or rearrange where the group is standing, so you can use a bounce surface. Or. Consider taking that flash off camera, and remotely triggering it somehow (most commonly, with a radio transmitter/receiver).






          share|improve this answer






























            2














            In addition to what xiota suggests, you need to consider how the inverse square law applies here (What is the inverse-square law, and how does it apply to lighting for photography?).



            If you were forced to only bounce the light off the ceiling, then to even out the exposure from top to bottom, you'd need to increase the total distance the light has to travel so that the difference between light path to top and light path to bottom are ratios that are closer together. This is often hard to control, as you can't adjust the ceiling height and often have little working room for which to move back - and the solution of decoupling the flash from the camera to move it further behind you, for example, actually opens the door to better lighting methods.



            If you can get the flash off the camera - this would be the most ideal as you have more control over where the strobe sits relative to the subject and any sort of modifiers you want to use to soften the light.



            If you cannot decouple the flash from the camera, then your next best option is to direct some of the light forward so that it can fill in where the main light path has started to fall-off. This is done by extending the bounce card up (if your flash has one), adding a home-made bounce card, or using a light modifier that throws the light in all directions (something like a Magmod of Fonger)






            share|improve this answer























            • Thought I'd typed about the bounce card, but guess forgot.

              – xiota
              44 mins ago


















            1














            In addition to the light falloff across the frame, there are some light-dark bands, possibly caused by flickering artificial lights?



            Options to consider:



            • Reduce shutter speed or use sync settings on camera to eliminate banding.


            • Use diffuser in addition to bouce.


            • Use the bounce card on your flash.

            • Change the angle of bounce. (See inkista's answer.)

            • Try bouncing off nearby walls.

            • Bounce off a reflector, held by assistant or stand.

            • Umbrellas and soft boxes?

            • Off camera flash (See Hueco's answer.)

            The problem should be fairly easy to fix with post processing.



            • Create layer with black to white gradient matching the change in light levels. You can even grab, expand, blur, invert, and desaturate a section of the wall. Using a portion of the wall will help reduce the appearance of the bands. You will need to clone out the logos.

            • Find an appropriate layer blending mode. (I used overlay.)

            • Change opacity to taste. (I used 35%.)

            • Touch up with dodge and burn. (I skipped this, so banding is still visible.)

            There are more complicated methods, but the basic idea of using layer blending modes is the same.



            gradientimage






            share|improve this answer

























              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "61"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );






              Geoff Shaw Photography is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f107809%2fflash-for-group-photos-near-wall%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              3














              You need to think about the direction of the light when you bounce.



              Bouncing isn't just about pointing the flash up, or up and forward. It's about picking the direction of your light. If you're bouncing, you have to stop thinking of the flash as your light source, and think of the reflecting surface your flash is pointed at as your light source. In other words, point the head of the flash at where you'd put a softbox in a studio. In this specific case, you put the light in the ceiling, straight over your head, more or less pointing downwards.



              If you want the light to come from the front more, you need to bounce behind you. But there may not be a reflective surface (wall) there. So, choosing where in the room you do this, and how the room is shaped / how far away the walls/ceiling are all key. The higher the ceiling, the less liable you'll be able to bounce, because light, like all forms of electromagnetic energy, falls of according to inverse square. Double the distance, you quarter the light. Triple it, and you've only got one-ninth. There are reasons to still use a high ISO setting, even if you use a flash.



              You may need to set up a reflector or reflective surface, or rearrange where the group is standing, so you can use a bounce surface. Or. Consider taking that flash off camera, and remotely triggering it somehow (most commonly, with a radio transmitter/receiver).






              share|improve this answer



























                3














                You need to think about the direction of the light when you bounce.



                Bouncing isn't just about pointing the flash up, or up and forward. It's about picking the direction of your light. If you're bouncing, you have to stop thinking of the flash as your light source, and think of the reflecting surface your flash is pointed at as your light source. In other words, point the head of the flash at where you'd put a softbox in a studio. In this specific case, you put the light in the ceiling, straight over your head, more or less pointing downwards.



                If you want the light to come from the front more, you need to bounce behind you. But there may not be a reflective surface (wall) there. So, choosing where in the room you do this, and how the room is shaped / how far away the walls/ceiling are all key. The higher the ceiling, the less liable you'll be able to bounce, because light, like all forms of electromagnetic energy, falls of according to inverse square. Double the distance, you quarter the light. Triple it, and you've only got one-ninth. There are reasons to still use a high ISO setting, even if you use a flash.



                You may need to set up a reflector or reflective surface, or rearrange where the group is standing, so you can use a bounce surface. Or. Consider taking that flash off camera, and remotely triggering it somehow (most commonly, with a radio transmitter/receiver).






                share|improve this answer

























                  3












                  3








                  3







                  You need to think about the direction of the light when you bounce.



                  Bouncing isn't just about pointing the flash up, or up and forward. It's about picking the direction of your light. If you're bouncing, you have to stop thinking of the flash as your light source, and think of the reflecting surface your flash is pointed at as your light source. In other words, point the head of the flash at where you'd put a softbox in a studio. In this specific case, you put the light in the ceiling, straight over your head, more or less pointing downwards.



                  If you want the light to come from the front more, you need to bounce behind you. But there may not be a reflective surface (wall) there. So, choosing where in the room you do this, and how the room is shaped / how far away the walls/ceiling are all key. The higher the ceiling, the less liable you'll be able to bounce, because light, like all forms of electromagnetic energy, falls of according to inverse square. Double the distance, you quarter the light. Triple it, and you've only got one-ninth. There are reasons to still use a high ISO setting, even if you use a flash.



                  You may need to set up a reflector or reflective surface, or rearrange where the group is standing, so you can use a bounce surface. Or. Consider taking that flash off camera, and remotely triggering it somehow (most commonly, with a radio transmitter/receiver).






                  share|improve this answer













                  You need to think about the direction of the light when you bounce.



                  Bouncing isn't just about pointing the flash up, or up and forward. It's about picking the direction of your light. If you're bouncing, you have to stop thinking of the flash as your light source, and think of the reflecting surface your flash is pointed at as your light source. In other words, point the head of the flash at where you'd put a softbox in a studio. In this specific case, you put the light in the ceiling, straight over your head, more or less pointing downwards.



                  If you want the light to come from the front more, you need to bounce behind you. But there may not be a reflective surface (wall) there. So, choosing where in the room you do this, and how the room is shaped / how far away the walls/ceiling are all key. The higher the ceiling, the less liable you'll be able to bounce, because light, like all forms of electromagnetic energy, falls of according to inverse square. Double the distance, you quarter the light. Triple it, and you've only got one-ninth. There are reasons to still use a high ISO setting, even if you use a flash.



                  You may need to set up a reflector or reflective surface, or rearrange where the group is standing, so you can use a bounce surface. Or. Consider taking that flash off camera, and remotely triggering it somehow (most commonly, with a radio transmitter/receiver).







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 58 mins ago









                  inkistainkista

                  41.3k562107




                  41.3k562107























                      2














                      In addition to what xiota suggests, you need to consider how the inverse square law applies here (What is the inverse-square law, and how does it apply to lighting for photography?).



                      If you were forced to only bounce the light off the ceiling, then to even out the exposure from top to bottom, you'd need to increase the total distance the light has to travel so that the difference between light path to top and light path to bottom are ratios that are closer together. This is often hard to control, as you can't adjust the ceiling height and often have little working room for which to move back - and the solution of decoupling the flash from the camera to move it further behind you, for example, actually opens the door to better lighting methods.



                      If you can get the flash off the camera - this would be the most ideal as you have more control over where the strobe sits relative to the subject and any sort of modifiers you want to use to soften the light.



                      If you cannot decouple the flash from the camera, then your next best option is to direct some of the light forward so that it can fill in where the main light path has started to fall-off. This is done by extending the bounce card up (if your flash has one), adding a home-made bounce card, or using a light modifier that throws the light in all directions (something like a Magmod of Fonger)






                      share|improve this answer























                      • Thought I'd typed about the bounce card, but guess forgot.

                        – xiota
                        44 mins ago















                      2














                      In addition to what xiota suggests, you need to consider how the inverse square law applies here (What is the inverse-square law, and how does it apply to lighting for photography?).



                      If you were forced to only bounce the light off the ceiling, then to even out the exposure from top to bottom, you'd need to increase the total distance the light has to travel so that the difference between light path to top and light path to bottom are ratios that are closer together. This is often hard to control, as you can't adjust the ceiling height and often have little working room for which to move back - and the solution of decoupling the flash from the camera to move it further behind you, for example, actually opens the door to better lighting methods.



                      If you can get the flash off the camera - this would be the most ideal as you have more control over where the strobe sits relative to the subject and any sort of modifiers you want to use to soften the light.



                      If you cannot decouple the flash from the camera, then your next best option is to direct some of the light forward so that it can fill in where the main light path has started to fall-off. This is done by extending the bounce card up (if your flash has one), adding a home-made bounce card, or using a light modifier that throws the light in all directions (something like a Magmod of Fonger)






                      share|improve this answer























                      • Thought I'd typed about the bounce card, but guess forgot.

                        – xiota
                        44 mins ago













                      2












                      2








                      2







                      In addition to what xiota suggests, you need to consider how the inverse square law applies here (What is the inverse-square law, and how does it apply to lighting for photography?).



                      If you were forced to only bounce the light off the ceiling, then to even out the exposure from top to bottom, you'd need to increase the total distance the light has to travel so that the difference between light path to top and light path to bottom are ratios that are closer together. This is often hard to control, as you can't adjust the ceiling height and often have little working room for which to move back - and the solution of decoupling the flash from the camera to move it further behind you, for example, actually opens the door to better lighting methods.



                      If you can get the flash off the camera - this would be the most ideal as you have more control over where the strobe sits relative to the subject and any sort of modifiers you want to use to soften the light.



                      If you cannot decouple the flash from the camera, then your next best option is to direct some of the light forward so that it can fill in where the main light path has started to fall-off. This is done by extending the bounce card up (if your flash has one), adding a home-made bounce card, or using a light modifier that throws the light in all directions (something like a Magmod of Fonger)






                      share|improve this answer













                      In addition to what xiota suggests, you need to consider how the inverse square law applies here (What is the inverse-square law, and how does it apply to lighting for photography?).



                      If you were forced to only bounce the light off the ceiling, then to even out the exposure from top to bottom, you'd need to increase the total distance the light has to travel so that the difference between light path to top and light path to bottom are ratios that are closer together. This is often hard to control, as you can't adjust the ceiling height and often have little working room for which to move back - and the solution of decoupling the flash from the camera to move it further behind you, for example, actually opens the door to better lighting methods.



                      If you can get the flash off the camera - this would be the most ideal as you have more control over where the strobe sits relative to the subject and any sort of modifiers you want to use to soften the light.



                      If you cannot decouple the flash from the camera, then your next best option is to direct some of the light forward so that it can fill in where the main light path has started to fall-off. This is done by extending the bounce card up (if your flash has one), adding a home-made bounce card, or using a light modifier that throws the light in all directions (something like a Magmod of Fonger)







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered 2 hours ago









                      HuecoHueco

                      12.6k32858




                      12.6k32858












                      • Thought I'd typed about the bounce card, but guess forgot.

                        – xiota
                        44 mins ago

















                      • Thought I'd typed about the bounce card, but guess forgot.

                        – xiota
                        44 mins ago
















                      Thought I'd typed about the bounce card, but guess forgot.

                      – xiota
                      44 mins ago





                      Thought I'd typed about the bounce card, but guess forgot.

                      – xiota
                      44 mins ago











                      1














                      In addition to the light falloff across the frame, there are some light-dark bands, possibly caused by flickering artificial lights?



                      Options to consider:



                      • Reduce shutter speed or use sync settings on camera to eliminate banding.


                      • Use diffuser in addition to bouce.


                      • Use the bounce card on your flash.

                      • Change the angle of bounce. (See inkista's answer.)

                      • Try bouncing off nearby walls.

                      • Bounce off a reflector, held by assistant or stand.

                      • Umbrellas and soft boxes?

                      • Off camera flash (See Hueco's answer.)

                      The problem should be fairly easy to fix with post processing.



                      • Create layer with black to white gradient matching the change in light levels. You can even grab, expand, blur, invert, and desaturate a section of the wall. Using a portion of the wall will help reduce the appearance of the bands. You will need to clone out the logos.

                      • Find an appropriate layer blending mode. (I used overlay.)

                      • Change opacity to taste. (I used 35%.)

                      • Touch up with dodge and burn. (I skipped this, so banding is still visible.)

                      There are more complicated methods, but the basic idea of using layer blending modes is the same.



                      gradientimage






                      share|improve this answer





























                        1














                        In addition to the light falloff across the frame, there are some light-dark bands, possibly caused by flickering artificial lights?



                        Options to consider:



                        • Reduce shutter speed or use sync settings on camera to eliminate banding.


                        • Use diffuser in addition to bouce.


                        • Use the bounce card on your flash.

                        • Change the angle of bounce. (See inkista's answer.)

                        • Try bouncing off nearby walls.

                        • Bounce off a reflector, held by assistant or stand.

                        • Umbrellas and soft boxes?

                        • Off camera flash (See Hueco's answer.)

                        The problem should be fairly easy to fix with post processing.



                        • Create layer with black to white gradient matching the change in light levels. You can even grab, expand, blur, invert, and desaturate a section of the wall. Using a portion of the wall will help reduce the appearance of the bands. You will need to clone out the logos.

                        • Find an appropriate layer blending mode. (I used overlay.)

                        • Change opacity to taste. (I used 35%.)

                        • Touch up with dodge and burn. (I skipped this, so banding is still visible.)

                        There are more complicated methods, but the basic idea of using layer blending modes is the same.



                        gradientimage






                        share|improve this answer



























                          1












                          1








                          1







                          In addition to the light falloff across the frame, there are some light-dark bands, possibly caused by flickering artificial lights?



                          Options to consider:



                          • Reduce shutter speed or use sync settings on camera to eliminate banding.


                          • Use diffuser in addition to bouce.


                          • Use the bounce card on your flash.

                          • Change the angle of bounce. (See inkista's answer.)

                          • Try bouncing off nearby walls.

                          • Bounce off a reflector, held by assistant or stand.

                          • Umbrellas and soft boxes?

                          • Off camera flash (See Hueco's answer.)

                          The problem should be fairly easy to fix with post processing.



                          • Create layer with black to white gradient matching the change in light levels. You can even grab, expand, blur, invert, and desaturate a section of the wall. Using a portion of the wall will help reduce the appearance of the bands. You will need to clone out the logos.

                          • Find an appropriate layer blending mode. (I used overlay.)

                          • Change opacity to taste. (I used 35%.)

                          • Touch up with dodge and burn. (I skipped this, so banding is still visible.)

                          There are more complicated methods, but the basic idea of using layer blending modes is the same.



                          gradientimage






                          share|improve this answer















                          In addition to the light falloff across the frame, there are some light-dark bands, possibly caused by flickering artificial lights?



                          Options to consider:



                          • Reduce shutter speed or use sync settings on camera to eliminate banding.


                          • Use diffuser in addition to bouce.


                          • Use the bounce card on your flash.

                          • Change the angle of bounce. (See inkista's answer.)

                          • Try bouncing off nearby walls.

                          • Bounce off a reflector, held by assistant or stand.

                          • Umbrellas and soft boxes?

                          • Off camera flash (See Hueco's answer.)

                          The problem should be fairly easy to fix with post processing.



                          • Create layer with black to white gradient matching the change in light levels. You can even grab, expand, blur, invert, and desaturate a section of the wall. Using a portion of the wall will help reduce the appearance of the bands. You will need to clone out the logos.

                          • Find an appropriate layer blending mode. (I used overlay.)

                          • Change opacity to taste. (I used 35%.)

                          • Touch up with dodge and burn. (I skipped this, so banding is still visible.)

                          There are more complicated methods, but the basic idea of using layer blending modes is the same.



                          gradientimage







                          share|improve this answer














                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer








                          edited 5 mins ago

























                          answered 3 hours ago









                          xiotaxiota

                          12.3k41864




                          12.3k41864




















                              Geoff Shaw Photography is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                              draft saved

                              draft discarded


















                              Geoff Shaw Photography is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                              Geoff Shaw Photography is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                              Geoff Shaw Photography is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Photography Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f107809%2fflash-for-group-photos-near-wall%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                              Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                              Tom Holland Mục lục Đầu đời và giáo dục | Sự nghiệp | Cuộc sống cá nhân | Phim tham gia | Giải thưởng và đề cử | Chú thích | Liên kết ngoài | Trình đơn chuyển hướngProfile“Person Details for Thomas Stanley Holland, "England and Wales Birth Registration Index, 1837-2008" — FamilySearch.org”"Meet Tom Holland... the 16-year-old star of The Impossible""Schoolboy actor Tom Holland finds himself in Oscar contention for role in tsunami drama"“Naomi Watts on the Prince William and Harry's reaction to her film about the late Princess Diana”lưu trữ"Holland and Pflueger Are West End's Two New 'Billy Elliots'""I'm so envious of my son, the movie star! British writer Dominic Holland's spent 20 years trying to crack Hollywood - but he's been beaten to it by a very unlikely rival"“Richard and Margaret Povey of Jersey, Channel Islands, UK: Information about Thomas Stanley Holland”"Tom Holland to play Billy Elliot""New Billy Elliot leaving the garage"Billy Elliot the Musical - Tom Holland - Billy"A Tale of four Billys: Tom Holland""The Feel Good Factor""Thames Christian College schoolboys join Myleene Klass for The Feelgood Factor""Government launches £600,000 arts bursaries pilot""BILLY's Chapman, Holland, Gardner & Jackson-Keen Visit Prime Minister""Elton John 'blown away' by Billy Elliot fifth birthday" (video with John's interview and fragments of Holland's performance)"First News interviews Arrietty's Tom Holland"“33rd Critics' Circle Film Awards winners”“National Board of Review Current Awards”Bản gốc"Ron Howard Whaling Tale 'In The Heart Of The Sea' Casts Tom Holland"“'Spider-Man' Finds Tom Holland to Star as New Web-Slinger”lưu trữ“Captain America: Civil War (2016)”“Film Review: ‘Captain America: Civil War’”lưu trữ“‘Captain America: Civil War’ review: Choose your own avenger”lưu trữ“The Lost City of Z reviews”“Sony Pictures and Marvel Studios Find Their 'Spider-Man' Star and Director”“‘Mary Magdalene’, ‘Current War’ & ‘Wind River’ Get 2017 Release Dates From Weinstein”“Lionsgate Unleashing Daisy Ridley & Tom Holland Starrer ‘Chaos Walking’ In Cannes”“PTA's 'Master' Leads Chicago Film Critics Nominations, UPDATED: Houston and Indiana Critics Nominations”“Nominaciones Goya 2013 Telecinco Cinema – ENG”“Jameson Empire Film Awards: Martin Freeman wins best actor for performance in The Hobbit”“34th Annual Young Artist Awards”Bản gốc“Teen Choice Awards 2016—Captain America: Civil War Leads Second Wave of Nominations”“BAFTA Film Award Nominations: ‘La La Land’ Leads Race”“Saturn Awards Nominations 2017: 'Rogue One,' 'Walking Dead' Lead”Tom HollandTom HollandTom HollandTom Hollandmedia.gettyimages.comWorldCat Identities300279794no20130442900000 0004 0355 42791085670554170004732cb16706349t(data)XX5557367