Workplace compensation backtracking when considering salary [closed]What would be the most appropriate time to ask for a raise for my summer job? Or would it not be appropriate at all?How to mention that I won't do more for the same price?Salary Compensation PracticesCompany backtracking on compensation and company housingHow to prepare for a conversation with someone much higher up?

How can I improve combat so my players don't always use the strategy of collectively focusing fire on one enemy at a time until it's dead?

SSH host identification changes on one wireless network

Is it a mistake to use a password that has previously been used (by anyone ever)?

Does removing finitely many points from an open set yield an open set?

How can I simplify this sum any further?

Why chip designers chose to jump from 32bit to 64bit CPUs?

Running code in a different tmux pane

Search Console unable to access website after DNS change

How to explain to traditional people why they should upgrade their old Windows XP device?

Employer withholds last paycheck in Virginia

Stack data structure in python 3

Ethics: Is it ethical for a professor to conduct research using a student's ideas without giving them credit?

how can traditional forms of magic compete against demon magic?

If צחק refers to the 3 worst misdeeds why Itzchak was called so?

What other tricks were there to get more data onto floppy disks?

N-Dimensional Cartesian Product

Did Ohio pass a law granting students the right to give scientifically wrong answers consistent with their religious beliefs?

Why are rain clouds darker?

Buddha Hinduism

Can't CD to Desktop anymore

What was the deal with the news stories about rats in "Joker"?

What does "Filiane" mean?

Days in indexed month

Why does Greedo say "Maclunkey" in the Mos Eisley Cantina?



Workplace compensation backtracking when considering salary [closed]


What would be the most appropriate time to ask for a raise for my summer job? Or would it not be appropriate at all?How to mention that I won't do more for the same price?Salary Compensation PracticesCompany backtracking on compensation and company housingHow to prepare for a conversation with someone much higher up?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;









3


















I started working at company X 8 months ago as a software developer, after graduating from university. I was working with no problems and hearing only praise.



The company underwent a new compensation model change where we are ranked based on levels of contribution. This also affects salary.



I was told I was higher level than my salary and asked specifically where I was in the new level. I was told mid to low in that level range.



Originally I decided to wait as I hoped they would bring salary adjustment changes up. This never happened. I brought up salary adjustment later on and they said they would get back to me. After a while I asked again (roughly 1 month), and they mentioned I was actually "incorrectly" placed into that higher level but we will keep you there "as its easier to move within levels".



I brought this up in a meeting with my peers as the conversation was shifted to compensation. This was probably not the best idea, and I was told as such from higher ups.



I'm not sure how I should be proceeding. I can find another company to work at that would (hopefully) compensate me fairly for the work I was doing, which is something I have been thinking of doing.



I am required for a big project that is nearing release and I think it would reflect poorly on me if I left, as the city I am in has a fairly close and small tech scene.



I am wondering if it is a better idea to seek a new employer who will compensate me for what I am asking, or stick with my current employer and see this incidence as a small hiccup?



Edit for clarification: Project is nearing completion, roughly 4-5 weeks away from launch and my departure will guarantee on missing launch date.










share|improve this question

















closed as unclear what you're asking by Dan Neely, gnat, mag, espindolaa, sf02 Oct 16 at 14:56


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.














  • 3





    Leaving a company with an upcoming project shouldn't be an issue. It is far easier to replace someone before a project, instead of halfway when they have accrued specific knowledge in the system and how it functions (Specially as you aren't a senior or architect). Make sure to secure a job before handing in your resignation. This way, even if it reflected poorly on you, you would already have secured a job.

    – Shadowzee
    Oct 16 at 3:41











  • "The company underwent a new compensation model change where we are ranked based on levels of contribution". This sounds quite bad in itself. How is measured "levels of contribution" ?

    – Arthur Havlicek
    Oct 16 at 4:36











  • Given that you are already considering looking for a new job, I would suggest not taking that. Demand your compensation as per new regulations, or only do the bad job that you are payed for. Yes, they will not like you at all, but right now it sounds not like a place to work at anyway.

    – Dirk
    Oct 16 at 6:28






  • 2





    This was probably not the best idea, and I was told as such from higher ups. Side Note: Your higher ups telling you that you can't discuss salary with your co-workers may be illegal depending on where you live.

    – BSMP
    Oct 16 at 10:54











  • @ArthurHavlicek its hard to say, they are very vague with the levels. It is based on "contribution" levels, which is why I think I was placed in a higher level. They recognized my value being higher than what I'm being paid for but seem to refute that now money is involved.

    – workplacethrowa2000
    Oct 16 at 16:30

















3


















I started working at company X 8 months ago as a software developer, after graduating from university. I was working with no problems and hearing only praise.



The company underwent a new compensation model change where we are ranked based on levels of contribution. This also affects salary.



I was told I was higher level than my salary and asked specifically where I was in the new level. I was told mid to low in that level range.



Originally I decided to wait as I hoped they would bring salary adjustment changes up. This never happened. I brought up salary adjustment later on and they said they would get back to me. After a while I asked again (roughly 1 month), and they mentioned I was actually "incorrectly" placed into that higher level but we will keep you there "as its easier to move within levels".



I brought this up in a meeting with my peers as the conversation was shifted to compensation. This was probably not the best idea, and I was told as such from higher ups.



I'm not sure how I should be proceeding. I can find another company to work at that would (hopefully) compensate me fairly for the work I was doing, which is something I have been thinking of doing.



I am required for a big project that is nearing release and I think it would reflect poorly on me if I left, as the city I am in has a fairly close and small tech scene.



I am wondering if it is a better idea to seek a new employer who will compensate me for what I am asking, or stick with my current employer and see this incidence as a small hiccup?



Edit for clarification: Project is nearing completion, roughly 4-5 weeks away from launch and my departure will guarantee on missing launch date.










share|improve this question

















closed as unclear what you're asking by Dan Neely, gnat, mag, espindolaa, sf02 Oct 16 at 14:56


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.














  • 3





    Leaving a company with an upcoming project shouldn't be an issue. It is far easier to replace someone before a project, instead of halfway when they have accrued specific knowledge in the system and how it functions (Specially as you aren't a senior or architect). Make sure to secure a job before handing in your resignation. This way, even if it reflected poorly on you, you would already have secured a job.

    – Shadowzee
    Oct 16 at 3:41











  • "The company underwent a new compensation model change where we are ranked based on levels of contribution". This sounds quite bad in itself. How is measured "levels of contribution" ?

    – Arthur Havlicek
    Oct 16 at 4:36











  • Given that you are already considering looking for a new job, I would suggest not taking that. Demand your compensation as per new regulations, or only do the bad job that you are payed for. Yes, they will not like you at all, but right now it sounds not like a place to work at anyway.

    – Dirk
    Oct 16 at 6:28






  • 2





    This was probably not the best idea, and I was told as such from higher ups. Side Note: Your higher ups telling you that you can't discuss salary with your co-workers may be illegal depending on where you live.

    – BSMP
    Oct 16 at 10:54











  • @ArthurHavlicek its hard to say, they are very vague with the levels. It is based on "contribution" levels, which is why I think I was placed in a higher level. They recognized my value being higher than what I'm being paid for but seem to refute that now money is involved.

    – workplacethrowa2000
    Oct 16 at 16:30













3













3









3








I started working at company X 8 months ago as a software developer, after graduating from university. I was working with no problems and hearing only praise.



The company underwent a new compensation model change where we are ranked based on levels of contribution. This also affects salary.



I was told I was higher level than my salary and asked specifically where I was in the new level. I was told mid to low in that level range.



Originally I decided to wait as I hoped they would bring salary adjustment changes up. This never happened. I brought up salary adjustment later on and they said they would get back to me. After a while I asked again (roughly 1 month), and they mentioned I was actually "incorrectly" placed into that higher level but we will keep you there "as its easier to move within levels".



I brought this up in a meeting with my peers as the conversation was shifted to compensation. This was probably not the best idea, and I was told as such from higher ups.



I'm not sure how I should be proceeding. I can find another company to work at that would (hopefully) compensate me fairly for the work I was doing, which is something I have been thinking of doing.



I am required for a big project that is nearing release and I think it would reflect poorly on me if I left, as the city I am in has a fairly close and small tech scene.



I am wondering if it is a better idea to seek a new employer who will compensate me for what I am asking, or stick with my current employer and see this incidence as a small hiccup?



Edit for clarification: Project is nearing completion, roughly 4-5 weeks away from launch and my departure will guarantee on missing launch date.










share|improve this question
















I started working at company X 8 months ago as a software developer, after graduating from university. I was working with no problems and hearing only praise.



The company underwent a new compensation model change where we are ranked based on levels of contribution. This also affects salary.



I was told I was higher level than my salary and asked specifically where I was in the new level. I was told mid to low in that level range.



Originally I decided to wait as I hoped they would bring salary adjustment changes up. This never happened. I brought up salary adjustment later on and they said they would get back to me. After a while I asked again (roughly 1 month), and they mentioned I was actually "incorrectly" placed into that higher level but we will keep you there "as its easier to move within levels".



I brought this up in a meeting with my peers as the conversation was shifted to compensation. This was probably not the best idea, and I was told as such from higher ups.



I'm not sure how I should be proceeding. I can find another company to work at that would (hopefully) compensate me fairly for the work I was doing, which is something I have been thinking of doing.



I am required for a big project that is nearing release and I think it would reflect poorly on me if I left, as the city I am in has a fairly close and small tech scene.



I am wondering if it is a better idea to seek a new employer who will compensate me for what I am asking, or stick with my current employer and see this incidence as a small hiccup?



Edit for clarification: Project is nearing completion, roughly 4-5 weeks away from launch and my departure will guarantee on missing launch date.







software-industry communication salary compensation






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Oct 16 at 17:07









Joe Strazzere

280k147 gold badges841 silver badges1155 bronze badges




280k147 gold badges841 silver badges1155 bronze badges










asked Oct 16 at 2:04









workplacethrowa2000workplacethrowa2000

393 bronze badges




393 bronze badges





closed as unclear what you're asking by Dan Neely, gnat, mag, espindolaa, sf02 Oct 16 at 14:56


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











closed as unclear what you're asking by Dan Neely, gnat, mag, espindolaa, sf02 Oct 16 at 14:56


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









closed as unclear what you're asking by Dan Neely, gnat, mag, espindolaa, sf02 Oct 16 at 14:56


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









  • 3





    Leaving a company with an upcoming project shouldn't be an issue. It is far easier to replace someone before a project, instead of halfway when they have accrued specific knowledge in the system and how it functions (Specially as you aren't a senior or architect). Make sure to secure a job before handing in your resignation. This way, even if it reflected poorly on you, you would already have secured a job.

    – Shadowzee
    Oct 16 at 3:41











  • "The company underwent a new compensation model change where we are ranked based on levels of contribution". This sounds quite bad in itself. How is measured "levels of contribution" ?

    – Arthur Havlicek
    Oct 16 at 4:36











  • Given that you are already considering looking for a new job, I would suggest not taking that. Demand your compensation as per new regulations, or only do the bad job that you are payed for. Yes, they will not like you at all, but right now it sounds not like a place to work at anyway.

    – Dirk
    Oct 16 at 6:28






  • 2





    This was probably not the best idea, and I was told as such from higher ups. Side Note: Your higher ups telling you that you can't discuss salary with your co-workers may be illegal depending on where you live.

    – BSMP
    Oct 16 at 10:54











  • @ArthurHavlicek its hard to say, they are very vague with the levels. It is based on "contribution" levels, which is why I think I was placed in a higher level. They recognized my value being higher than what I'm being paid for but seem to refute that now money is involved.

    – workplacethrowa2000
    Oct 16 at 16:30












  • 3





    Leaving a company with an upcoming project shouldn't be an issue. It is far easier to replace someone before a project, instead of halfway when they have accrued specific knowledge in the system and how it functions (Specially as you aren't a senior or architect). Make sure to secure a job before handing in your resignation. This way, even if it reflected poorly on you, you would already have secured a job.

    – Shadowzee
    Oct 16 at 3:41











  • "The company underwent a new compensation model change where we are ranked based on levels of contribution". This sounds quite bad in itself. How is measured "levels of contribution" ?

    – Arthur Havlicek
    Oct 16 at 4:36











  • Given that you are already considering looking for a new job, I would suggest not taking that. Demand your compensation as per new regulations, or only do the bad job that you are payed for. Yes, they will not like you at all, but right now it sounds not like a place to work at anyway.

    – Dirk
    Oct 16 at 6:28






  • 2





    This was probably not the best idea, and I was told as such from higher ups. Side Note: Your higher ups telling you that you can't discuss salary with your co-workers may be illegal depending on where you live.

    – BSMP
    Oct 16 at 10:54











  • @ArthurHavlicek its hard to say, they are very vague with the levels. It is based on "contribution" levels, which is why I think I was placed in a higher level. They recognized my value being higher than what I'm being paid for but seem to refute that now money is involved.

    – workplacethrowa2000
    Oct 16 at 16:30







3




3





Leaving a company with an upcoming project shouldn't be an issue. It is far easier to replace someone before a project, instead of halfway when they have accrued specific knowledge in the system and how it functions (Specially as you aren't a senior or architect). Make sure to secure a job before handing in your resignation. This way, even if it reflected poorly on you, you would already have secured a job.

– Shadowzee
Oct 16 at 3:41





Leaving a company with an upcoming project shouldn't be an issue. It is far easier to replace someone before a project, instead of halfway when they have accrued specific knowledge in the system and how it functions (Specially as you aren't a senior or architect). Make sure to secure a job before handing in your resignation. This way, even if it reflected poorly on you, you would already have secured a job.

– Shadowzee
Oct 16 at 3:41













"The company underwent a new compensation model change where we are ranked based on levels of contribution". This sounds quite bad in itself. How is measured "levels of contribution" ?

– Arthur Havlicek
Oct 16 at 4:36





"The company underwent a new compensation model change where we are ranked based on levels of contribution". This sounds quite bad in itself. How is measured "levels of contribution" ?

– Arthur Havlicek
Oct 16 at 4:36













Given that you are already considering looking for a new job, I would suggest not taking that. Demand your compensation as per new regulations, or only do the bad job that you are payed for. Yes, they will not like you at all, but right now it sounds not like a place to work at anyway.

– Dirk
Oct 16 at 6:28





Given that you are already considering looking for a new job, I would suggest not taking that. Demand your compensation as per new regulations, or only do the bad job that you are payed for. Yes, they will not like you at all, but right now it sounds not like a place to work at anyway.

– Dirk
Oct 16 at 6:28




2




2





This was probably not the best idea, and I was told as such from higher ups. Side Note: Your higher ups telling you that you can't discuss salary with your co-workers may be illegal depending on where you live.

– BSMP
Oct 16 at 10:54





This was probably not the best idea, and I was told as such from higher ups. Side Note: Your higher ups telling you that you can't discuss salary with your co-workers may be illegal depending on where you live.

– BSMP
Oct 16 at 10:54













@ArthurHavlicek its hard to say, they are very vague with the levels. It is based on "contribution" levels, which is why I think I was placed in a higher level. They recognized my value being higher than what I'm being paid for but seem to refute that now money is involved.

– workplacethrowa2000
Oct 16 at 16:30





@ArthurHavlicek its hard to say, they are very vague with the levels. It is based on "contribution" levels, which is why I think I was placed in a higher level. They recognized my value being higher than what I'm being paid for but seem to refute that now money is involved.

– workplacethrowa2000
Oct 16 at 16:30










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















7



















The state of project is not really relevant here. The points you need to consider here are:



  • Are you satisfied with the work and compensation here?

  • Do you see value in the work you do?

  • Is you work/effort valued?

  • Did you try to talk / discuss the scenario/ situation you're currently in with higher-ups and received no positive sign?

If the answers of first three are negative and the last one is affirmative, you should move on and find a new job.






share|improve this answer




























  • This sounds like the OP's first post-college job. Given the small size of community and leaving within a year, there may be more to consider around this reference than most situations. That said, I agree with the conditions and if those imply leaving, OP should do so, but may need to factor in more notice or ways to salvage the reference than some cases my suggest.

    – John Spiegel
    Oct 16 at 13:16






  • 1





    I did have a talk with the higher ups and they went with I have bad attitude and should work hard, and if I truly am deserving of higher compensation it will come. I wouldnt really say thats a positive sign as they themselves have me rated higher in their own internal scale.

    – workplacethrowa2000
    Oct 16 at 16:27












  • Sounds like they have an attitude problem themselves. If they don't think a raise is merited they should at least be polite about it.

    – P. Hopkinson
    Oct 16 at 19:34



















2




















I am required for a big project that is nearing release and I think it would reflect poorly on me if I left




That's irrelevant. There's never going to be a nice, convenient time to leave. It's up to your employer to plan for these conditions accordingly, not you.




I was told I was higher level than my salary and asked specifically where I was in the new level. I was told mid to low in that level range.




...but where are you in the grand scheme of things, ignoring the internals of your company? This is the important question you don't seem to be considering.



Where you happen to be on an internal pay scale is nearly irrelevant. If you're right at the top of it and still earning half as much as you could get elsewhere, you've got a poor deal. If you're right at the bottom of it and earning twice as much as you could elsewhere, you'd be insane to quit (over compensation, anyway.)



If compensation is a really important factor to you, then do some independent research for other similar positions, and then use that to decide if you want to move. However, don't forget to factor in the following as well:



  • You're working with no problems, hearing praise

  • You seemed to be happy there (before this conversation started, anyway)

  • You've only been in this role 8 months, so you're unlikely to get a step up from graduate roles (and questions could well be asked as to why you're moving on so soon.)

All in all, unless you're receiving a really terrible deal, my gut feeling is that you'd be better staying where you are and keeping up the great work. If you still don't feel that's recognised and still feel you're getting a poor deal in another 6 months or so, you then may find more options open to you if you look elsewhere.






share|improve this answer

































    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    7



















    The state of project is not really relevant here. The points you need to consider here are:



    • Are you satisfied with the work and compensation here?

    • Do you see value in the work you do?

    • Is you work/effort valued?

    • Did you try to talk / discuss the scenario/ situation you're currently in with higher-ups and received no positive sign?

    If the answers of first three are negative and the last one is affirmative, you should move on and find a new job.






    share|improve this answer




























    • This sounds like the OP's first post-college job. Given the small size of community and leaving within a year, there may be more to consider around this reference than most situations. That said, I agree with the conditions and if those imply leaving, OP should do so, but may need to factor in more notice or ways to salvage the reference than some cases my suggest.

      – John Spiegel
      Oct 16 at 13:16






    • 1





      I did have a talk with the higher ups and they went with I have bad attitude and should work hard, and if I truly am deserving of higher compensation it will come. I wouldnt really say thats a positive sign as they themselves have me rated higher in their own internal scale.

      – workplacethrowa2000
      Oct 16 at 16:27












    • Sounds like they have an attitude problem themselves. If they don't think a raise is merited they should at least be polite about it.

      – P. Hopkinson
      Oct 16 at 19:34
















    7



















    The state of project is not really relevant here. The points you need to consider here are:



    • Are you satisfied with the work and compensation here?

    • Do you see value in the work you do?

    • Is you work/effort valued?

    • Did you try to talk / discuss the scenario/ situation you're currently in with higher-ups and received no positive sign?

    If the answers of first three are negative and the last one is affirmative, you should move on and find a new job.






    share|improve this answer




























    • This sounds like the OP's first post-college job. Given the small size of community and leaving within a year, there may be more to consider around this reference than most situations. That said, I agree with the conditions and if those imply leaving, OP should do so, but may need to factor in more notice or ways to salvage the reference than some cases my suggest.

      – John Spiegel
      Oct 16 at 13:16






    • 1





      I did have a talk with the higher ups and they went with I have bad attitude and should work hard, and if I truly am deserving of higher compensation it will come. I wouldnt really say thats a positive sign as they themselves have me rated higher in their own internal scale.

      – workplacethrowa2000
      Oct 16 at 16:27












    • Sounds like they have an attitude problem themselves. If they don't think a raise is merited they should at least be polite about it.

      – P. Hopkinson
      Oct 16 at 19:34














    7















    7











    7









    The state of project is not really relevant here. The points you need to consider here are:



    • Are you satisfied with the work and compensation here?

    • Do you see value in the work you do?

    • Is you work/effort valued?

    • Did you try to talk / discuss the scenario/ situation you're currently in with higher-ups and received no positive sign?

    If the answers of first three are negative and the last one is affirmative, you should move on and find a new job.






    share|improve this answer
















    The state of project is not really relevant here. The points you need to consider here are:



    • Are you satisfied with the work and compensation here?

    • Do you see value in the work you do?

    • Is you work/effort valued?

    • Did you try to talk / discuss the scenario/ situation you're currently in with higher-ups and received no positive sign?

    If the answers of first three are negative and the last one is affirmative, you should move on and find a new job.







    share|improve this answer















    share|improve this answer




    share|improve this answer








    edited Oct 16 at 13:19

























    answered Oct 16 at 4:53









    Sourav GhoshSourav Ghosh

    26.4k25 gold badges122 silver badges147 bronze badges




    26.4k25 gold badges122 silver badges147 bronze badges















    • This sounds like the OP's first post-college job. Given the small size of community and leaving within a year, there may be more to consider around this reference than most situations. That said, I agree with the conditions and if those imply leaving, OP should do so, but may need to factor in more notice or ways to salvage the reference than some cases my suggest.

      – John Spiegel
      Oct 16 at 13:16






    • 1





      I did have a talk with the higher ups and they went with I have bad attitude and should work hard, and if I truly am deserving of higher compensation it will come. I wouldnt really say thats a positive sign as they themselves have me rated higher in their own internal scale.

      – workplacethrowa2000
      Oct 16 at 16:27












    • Sounds like they have an attitude problem themselves. If they don't think a raise is merited they should at least be polite about it.

      – P. Hopkinson
      Oct 16 at 19:34


















    • This sounds like the OP's first post-college job. Given the small size of community and leaving within a year, there may be more to consider around this reference than most situations. That said, I agree with the conditions and if those imply leaving, OP should do so, but may need to factor in more notice or ways to salvage the reference than some cases my suggest.

      – John Spiegel
      Oct 16 at 13:16






    • 1





      I did have a talk with the higher ups and they went with I have bad attitude and should work hard, and if I truly am deserving of higher compensation it will come. I wouldnt really say thats a positive sign as they themselves have me rated higher in their own internal scale.

      – workplacethrowa2000
      Oct 16 at 16:27












    • Sounds like they have an attitude problem themselves. If they don't think a raise is merited they should at least be polite about it.

      – P. Hopkinson
      Oct 16 at 19:34

















    This sounds like the OP's first post-college job. Given the small size of community and leaving within a year, there may be more to consider around this reference than most situations. That said, I agree with the conditions and if those imply leaving, OP should do so, but may need to factor in more notice or ways to salvage the reference than some cases my suggest.

    – John Spiegel
    Oct 16 at 13:16





    This sounds like the OP's first post-college job. Given the small size of community and leaving within a year, there may be more to consider around this reference than most situations. That said, I agree with the conditions and if those imply leaving, OP should do so, but may need to factor in more notice or ways to salvage the reference than some cases my suggest.

    – John Spiegel
    Oct 16 at 13:16




    1




    1





    I did have a talk with the higher ups and they went with I have bad attitude and should work hard, and if I truly am deserving of higher compensation it will come. I wouldnt really say thats a positive sign as they themselves have me rated higher in their own internal scale.

    – workplacethrowa2000
    Oct 16 at 16:27






    I did have a talk with the higher ups and they went with I have bad attitude and should work hard, and if I truly am deserving of higher compensation it will come. I wouldnt really say thats a positive sign as they themselves have me rated higher in their own internal scale.

    – workplacethrowa2000
    Oct 16 at 16:27














    Sounds like they have an attitude problem themselves. If they don't think a raise is merited they should at least be polite about it.

    – P. Hopkinson
    Oct 16 at 19:34






    Sounds like they have an attitude problem themselves. If they don't think a raise is merited they should at least be polite about it.

    – P. Hopkinson
    Oct 16 at 19:34














    2




















    I am required for a big project that is nearing release and I think it would reflect poorly on me if I left




    That's irrelevant. There's never going to be a nice, convenient time to leave. It's up to your employer to plan for these conditions accordingly, not you.




    I was told I was higher level than my salary and asked specifically where I was in the new level. I was told mid to low in that level range.




    ...but where are you in the grand scheme of things, ignoring the internals of your company? This is the important question you don't seem to be considering.



    Where you happen to be on an internal pay scale is nearly irrelevant. If you're right at the top of it and still earning half as much as you could get elsewhere, you've got a poor deal. If you're right at the bottom of it and earning twice as much as you could elsewhere, you'd be insane to quit (over compensation, anyway.)



    If compensation is a really important factor to you, then do some independent research for other similar positions, and then use that to decide if you want to move. However, don't forget to factor in the following as well:



    • You're working with no problems, hearing praise

    • You seemed to be happy there (before this conversation started, anyway)

    • You've only been in this role 8 months, so you're unlikely to get a step up from graduate roles (and questions could well be asked as to why you're moving on so soon.)

    All in all, unless you're receiving a really terrible deal, my gut feeling is that you'd be better staying where you are and keeping up the great work. If you still don't feel that's recognised and still feel you're getting a poor deal in another 6 months or so, you then may find more options open to you if you look elsewhere.






    share|improve this answer






























      2




















      I am required for a big project that is nearing release and I think it would reflect poorly on me if I left




      That's irrelevant. There's never going to be a nice, convenient time to leave. It's up to your employer to plan for these conditions accordingly, not you.




      I was told I was higher level than my salary and asked specifically where I was in the new level. I was told mid to low in that level range.




      ...but where are you in the grand scheme of things, ignoring the internals of your company? This is the important question you don't seem to be considering.



      Where you happen to be on an internal pay scale is nearly irrelevant. If you're right at the top of it and still earning half as much as you could get elsewhere, you've got a poor deal. If you're right at the bottom of it and earning twice as much as you could elsewhere, you'd be insane to quit (over compensation, anyway.)



      If compensation is a really important factor to you, then do some independent research for other similar positions, and then use that to decide if you want to move. However, don't forget to factor in the following as well:



      • You're working with no problems, hearing praise

      • You seemed to be happy there (before this conversation started, anyway)

      • You've only been in this role 8 months, so you're unlikely to get a step up from graduate roles (and questions could well be asked as to why you're moving on so soon.)

      All in all, unless you're receiving a really terrible deal, my gut feeling is that you'd be better staying where you are and keeping up the great work. If you still don't feel that's recognised and still feel you're getting a poor deal in another 6 months or so, you then may find more options open to you if you look elsewhere.






      share|improve this answer




























        2















        2











        2










        I am required for a big project that is nearing release and I think it would reflect poorly on me if I left




        That's irrelevant. There's never going to be a nice, convenient time to leave. It's up to your employer to plan for these conditions accordingly, not you.




        I was told I was higher level than my salary and asked specifically where I was in the new level. I was told mid to low in that level range.




        ...but where are you in the grand scheme of things, ignoring the internals of your company? This is the important question you don't seem to be considering.



        Where you happen to be on an internal pay scale is nearly irrelevant. If you're right at the top of it and still earning half as much as you could get elsewhere, you've got a poor deal. If you're right at the bottom of it and earning twice as much as you could elsewhere, you'd be insane to quit (over compensation, anyway.)



        If compensation is a really important factor to you, then do some independent research for other similar positions, and then use that to decide if you want to move. However, don't forget to factor in the following as well:



        • You're working with no problems, hearing praise

        • You seemed to be happy there (before this conversation started, anyway)

        • You've only been in this role 8 months, so you're unlikely to get a step up from graduate roles (and questions could well be asked as to why you're moving on so soon.)

        All in all, unless you're receiving a really terrible deal, my gut feeling is that you'd be better staying where you are and keeping up the great work. If you still don't feel that's recognised and still feel you're getting a poor deal in another 6 months or so, you then may find more options open to you if you look elsewhere.






        share|improve this answer















        I am required for a big project that is nearing release and I think it would reflect poorly on me if I left




        That's irrelevant. There's never going to be a nice, convenient time to leave. It's up to your employer to plan for these conditions accordingly, not you.




        I was told I was higher level than my salary and asked specifically where I was in the new level. I was told mid to low in that level range.




        ...but where are you in the grand scheme of things, ignoring the internals of your company? This is the important question you don't seem to be considering.



        Where you happen to be on an internal pay scale is nearly irrelevant. If you're right at the top of it and still earning half as much as you could get elsewhere, you've got a poor deal. If you're right at the bottom of it and earning twice as much as you could elsewhere, you'd be insane to quit (over compensation, anyway.)



        If compensation is a really important factor to you, then do some independent research for other similar positions, and then use that to decide if you want to move. However, don't forget to factor in the following as well:



        • You're working with no problems, hearing praise

        • You seemed to be happy there (before this conversation started, anyway)

        • You've only been in this role 8 months, so you're unlikely to get a step up from graduate roles (and questions could well be asked as to why you're moving on so soon.)

        All in all, unless you're receiving a really terrible deal, my gut feeling is that you'd be better staying where you are and keeping up the great work. If you still don't feel that's recognised and still feel you're getting a poor deal in another 6 months or so, you then may find more options open to you if you look elsewhere.







        share|improve this answer













        share|improve this answer




        share|improve this answer










        answered Oct 16 at 11:04









        berry120berry120

        24.9k16 gold badges57 silver badges90 bronze badges




        24.9k16 gold badges57 silver badges90 bronze badges
















            Popular posts from this blog

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її