Solving the cubic without complex numbersSolving Cubic EquationProve or disprove this relation between one root of the quadratic and the cubic equation of a certain form, and linear recurrences.non-complex cubic roots formula?Solving general cubic without complicated substitutionsSolving a cubic with complex numbersFinding parameters of an ellipse in terms of Semi-Latus Rectum and Directrix.Solving cubic polynomialsDepressed cubic
Going to France with limited French for a day
Is it possible to constructively prove that every quaternion has a square root?
What are these pixel-level discolored specks? How can I fix it?
How to ask a man to not take up more than one seat on public transport while avoiding conflict?
What are these ingforms of learning?
Guitar tuning (EADGBE), "perfect" fourths?
Late 1970's and 6502 chip facilities for operating systems
A drug that allows people to survive on less food
Can the U.S. president make military decisions without consulting anyone?
Safely hang a mirror that does not have hooks
In a folk jam session, when asked which key my non-transposing chromatic instrument (like a violin) is in, what do I answer?
How do I deal with too many NPCs in my campaign?
What is the need of methods like GET and POST in the HTTP protocol?
1, 2, 4, 8, 16, ... 33?
How does IBM's 53-bit quantum computer compare to classical ones for cryptanalytic tasks?
Worms crawling under skin
The quicker I go up, the sooner I’ll go down - Riddle
What do the 2 last numbers between '()' mean in 227 response to “ls” command?
Why are there two fundamental laws of logic?
Which museums have artworks of all four Ninja Turtles' namesakes?
The 100 soldier problem
To what extent is it worthwhile to report check fraud / refund scams?
How can I repair this gas leak on my new range? Teflon tape isn't working
reverse a list of generic type
Solving the cubic without complex numbers
Solving Cubic EquationProve or disprove this relation between one root of the quadratic and the cubic equation of a certain form, and linear recurrences.non-complex cubic roots formula?Solving general cubic without complicated substitutionsSolving a cubic with complex numbersFinding parameters of an ellipse in terms of Semi-Latus Rectum and Directrix.Solving cubic polynomialsDepressed cubic
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
I am trying to work out the resolution of the cubic equation without resorting to complex numbers at all.
The general equation can in all cases be reduced to the depressed form,
$$x^3+px+q=0.$$
By a suitable scaling of the variable, this can be further reduced to
$$x^3-frac34x-frac r4=0$$ where $r>0$, or
$$4x^3-3x=r.$$
Then depending on the magnitude of $r$, we write
$$4cos^3t-3cos t=cos3t=r,$$ $$x=cosfracarccos(r)+2kpi3$$
or
$$4cosh^3t-3cosh t=cosh3t=r,$$ $$x=coshfractextarcosh(r)3.$$
This correctly handles the cases of $1$ and $3$ real roots.
Unfortunately, the trick only works for $p<0$. How can I solve in a similar way when $p>0$ ?
roots real-numbers cubic-equations
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
I am trying to work out the resolution of the cubic equation without resorting to complex numbers at all.
The general equation can in all cases be reduced to the depressed form,
$$x^3+px+q=0.$$
By a suitable scaling of the variable, this can be further reduced to
$$x^3-frac34x-frac r4=0$$ where $r>0$, or
$$4x^3-3x=r.$$
Then depending on the magnitude of $r$, we write
$$4cos^3t-3cos t=cos3t=r,$$ $$x=cosfracarccos(r)+2kpi3$$
or
$$4cosh^3t-3cosh t=cosh3t=r,$$ $$x=coshfractextarcosh(r)3.$$
This correctly handles the cases of $1$ and $3$ real roots.
Unfortunately, the trick only works for $p<0$. How can I solve in a similar way when $p>0$ ?
roots real-numbers cubic-equations
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
2 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
I am trying to work out the resolution of the cubic equation without resorting to complex numbers at all.
The general equation can in all cases be reduced to the depressed form,
$$x^3+px+q=0.$$
By a suitable scaling of the variable, this can be further reduced to
$$x^3-frac34x-frac r4=0$$ where $r>0$, or
$$4x^3-3x=r.$$
Then depending on the magnitude of $r$, we write
$$4cos^3t-3cos t=cos3t=r,$$ $$x=cosfracarccos(r)+2kpi3$$
or
$$4cosh^3t-3cosh t=cosh3t=r,$$ $$x=coshfractextarcosh(r)3.$$
This correctly handles the cases of $1$ and $3$ real roots.
Unfortunately, the trick only works for $p<0$. How can I solve in a similar way when $p>0$ ?
roots real-numbers cubic-equations
$endgroup$
I am trying to work out the resolution of the cubic equation without resorting to complex numbers at all.
The general equation can in all cases be reduced to the depressed form,
$$x^3+px+q=0.$$
By a suitable scaling of the variable, this can be further reduced to
$$x^3-frac34x-frac r4=0$$ where $r>0$, or
$$4x^3-3x=r.$$
Then depending on the magnitude of $r$, we write
$$4cos^3t-3cos t=cos3t=r,$$ $$x=cosfracarccos(r)+2kpi3$$
or
$$4cosh^3t-3cosh t=cosh3t=r,$$ $$x=coshfractextarcosh(r)3.$$
This correctly handles the cases of $1$ and $3$ real roots.
Unfortunately, the trick only works for $p<0$. How can I solve in a similar way when $p>0$ ?
roots real-numbers cubic-equations
roots real-numbers cubic-equations
asked 8 hours ago
Yves DaoustYves Daoust
146k10 gold badges89 silver badges248 bronze badges
146k10 gold badges89 silver badges248 bronze badges
$begingroup$
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
2 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
2 hours ago
add a comment
|
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
When $p>0$, you can apply Cardano's formula. It will give you the only real root of your cubic. And the formula will not have to deal with complex non-real numbers.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That's right, I forgot that. In fact the real case of Cardano also deals with my $r>1$, right ? I was hoping to find symmetric formulas.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
8 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Stupid me, I missed the relation
$$sinh 3t=4sinh^3t+3sinh t$$
which works without restrictions on the value of the LHS. It completely solves the case of $p>0$ as
$$sinhfractextarsinh(r)3.$$
Putting all together, one can solve all cases of the cubic by means of the following canonical "trisection" functions below, which solve
$$4y^3pm 3y=x.$$
The "hyperbolic" ones have expressions in terms of cubic roots, the trigonometric ones relate to the "casus irreductibilis".
Finally, it seems that it all boils down to the normalization of the equation to one of two forms, with or without an inflection, by an affine transformations of the argument, and getting rid of all coefficients.
This might look like a circular method (solving a cubic by solving a cubic), but we now have analytical expressions in terms of familiar transcendental, real functions.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3362769%2fsolving-the-cubic-without-complex-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
When $p>0$, you can apply Cardano's formula. It will give you the only real root of your cubic. And the formula will not have to deal with complex non-real numbers.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That's right, I forgot that. In fact the real case of Cardano also deals with my $r>1$, right ? I was hoping to find symmetric formulas.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
8 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
When $p>0$, you can apply Cardano's formula. It will give you the only real root of your cubic. And the formula will not have to deal with complex non-real numbers.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That's right, I forgot that. In fact the real case of Cardano also deals with my $r>1$, right ? I was hoping to find symmetric formulas.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
8 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
When $p>0$, you can apply Cardano's formula. It will give you the only real root of your cubic. And the formula will not have to deal with complex non-real numbers.
$endgroup$
When $p>0$, you can apply Cardano's formula. It will give you the only real root of your cubic. And the formula will not have to deal with complex non-real numbers.
answered 8 hours ago
José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos
215k26 gold badges167 silver badges291 bronze badges
215k26 gold badges167 silver badges291 bronze badges
$begingroup$
That's right, I forgot that. In fact the real case of Cardano also deals with my $r>1$, right ? I was hoping to find symmetric formulas.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
8 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
That's right, I forgot that. In fact the real case of Cardano also deals with my $r>1$, right ? I was hoping to find symmetric formulas.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
That's right, I forgot that. In fact the real case of Cardano also deals with my $r>1$, right ? I was hoping to find symmetric formulas.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
That's right, I forgot that. In fact the real case of Cardano also deals with my $r>1$, right ? I was hoping to find symmetric formulas.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
8 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Stupid me, I missed the relation
$$sinh 3t=4sinh^3t+3sinh t$$
which works without restrictions on the value of the LHS. It completely solves the case of $p>0$ as
$$sinhfractextarsinh(r)3.$$
Putting all together, one can solve all cases of the cubic by means of the following canonical "trisection" functions below, which solve
$$4y^3pm 3y=x.$$
The "hyperbolic" ones have expressions in terms of cubic roots, the trigonometric ones relate to the "casus irreductibilis".
Finally, it seems that it all boils down to the normalization of the equation to one of two forms, with or without an inflection, by an affine transformations of the argument, and getting rid of all coefficients.
This might look like a circular method (solving a cubic by solving a cubic), but we now have analytical expressions in terms of familiar transcendental, real functions.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Stupid me, I missed the relation
$$sinh 3t=4sinh^3t+3sinh t$$
which works without restrictions on the value of the LHS. It completely solves the case of $p>0$ as
$$sinhfractextarsinh(r)3.$$
Putting all together, one can solve all cases of the cubic by means of the following canonical "trisection" functions below, which solve
$$4y^3pm 3y=x.$$
The "hyperbolic" ones have expressions in terms of cubic roots, the trigonometric ones relate to the "casus irreductibilis".
Finally, it seems that it all boils down to the normalization of the equation to one of two forms, with or without an inflection, by an affine transformations of the argument, and getting rid of all coefficients.
This might look like a circular method (solving a cubic by solving a cubic), but we now have analytical expressions in terms of familiar transcendental, real functions.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Stupid me, I missed the relation
$$sinh 3t=4sinh^3t+3sinh t$$
which works without restrictions on the value of the LHS. It completely solves the case of $p>0$ as
$$sinhfractextarsinh(r)3.$$
Putting all together, one can solve all cases of the cubic by means of the following canonical "trisection" functions below, which solve
$$4y^3pm 3y=x.$$
The "hyperbolic" ones have expressions in terms of cubic roots, the trigonometric ones relate to the "casus irreductibilis".
Finally, it seems that it all boils down to the normalization of the equation to one of two forms, with or without an inflection, by an affine transformations of the argument, and getting rid of all coefficients.
This might look like a circular method (solving a cubic by solving a cubic), but we now have analytical expressions in terms of familiar transcendental, real functions.
$endgroup$
Stupid me, I missed the relation
$$sinh 3t=4sinh^3t+3sinh t$$
which works without restrictions on the value of the LHS. It completely solves the case of $p>0$ as
$$sinhfractextarsinh(r)3.$$
Putting all together, one can solve all cases of the cubic by means of the following canonical "trisection" functions below, which solve
$$4y^3pm 3y=x.$$
The "hyperbolic" ones have expressions in terms of cubic roots, the trigonometric ones relate to the "casus irreductibilis".
Finally, it seems that it all boils down to the normalization of the equation to one of two forms, with or without an inflection, by an affine transformations of the argument, and getting rid of all coefficients.
This might look like a circular method (solving a cubic by solving a cubic), but we now have analytical expressions in terms of familiar transcendental, real functions.
edited 7 hours ago
answered 8 hours ago
Yves DaoustYves Daoust
146k10 gold badges89 silver badges248 bronze badges
146k10 gold badges89 silver badges248 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3362769%2fsolving-the-cubic-without-complex-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
2 hours ago