Solving the cubic without complex numbersSolving Cubic EquationProve or disprove this relation between one root of the quadratic and the cubic equation of a certain form, and linear recurrences.non-complex cubic roots formula?Solving general cubic without complicated substitutionsSolving a cubic with complex numbersFinding parameters of an ellipse in terms of Semi-Latus Rectum and Directrix.Solving cubic polynomialsDepressed cubic

Going to France with limited French for a day

Is it possible to constructively prove that every quaternion has a square root?

What are these pixel-level discolored specks? How can I fix it?

How to ask a man to not take up more than one seat on public transport while avoiding conflict?

What are these ingforms of learning?

Guitar tuning (EADGBE), "perfect" fourths?

Late 1970's and 6502 chip facilities for operating systems

A drug that allows people to survive on less food

Can the U.S. president make military decisions without consulting anyone?

Safely hang a mirror that does not have hooks

In a folk jam session, when asked which key my non-transposing chromatic instrument (like a violin) is in, what do I answer?

How do I deal with too many NPCs in my campaign?

What is the need of methods like GET and POST in the HTTP protocol?

1, 2, 4, 8, 16, ... 33?

How does IBM's 53-bit quantum computer compare to classical ones for cryptanalytic tasks?

Worms crawling under skin

The quicker I go up, the sooner I’ll go down - Riddle

What do the 2 last numbers between '()' mean in 227 response to “ls” command?

Why are there two fundamental laws of logic?

Which museums have artworks of all four Ninja Turtles' namesakes?

The 100 soldier problem

To what extent is it worthwhile to report check fraud / refund scams?

How can I repair this gas leak on my new range? Teflon tape isn't working

reverse a list of generic type



Solving the cubic without complex numbers


Solving Cubic EquationProve or disprove this relation between one root of the quadratic and the cubic equation of a certain form, and linear recurrences.non-complex cubic roots formula?Solving general cubic without complicated substitutionsSolving a cubic with complex numbersFinding parameters of an ellipse in terms of Semi-Latus Rectum and Directrix.Solving cubic polynomialsDepressed cubic






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








4












$begingroup$


I am trying to work out the resolution of the cubic equation without resorting to complex numbers at all.



The general equation can in all cases be reduced to the depressed form,



$$x^3+px+q=0.$$



By a suitable scaling of the variable, this can be further reduced to



$$x^3-frac34x-frac r4=0$$ where $r>0$, or



$$4x^3-3x=r.$$



Then depending on the magnitude of $r$, we write



$$4cos^3t-3cos t=cos3t=r,$$ $$x=cosfracarccos(r)+2kpi3$$



or
$$4cosh^3t-3cosh t=cosh3t=r,$$ $$x=coshfractextarcosh(r)3.$$



This correctly handles the cases of $1$ and $3$ real roots.



Unfortunately, the trick only works for $p<0$. How can I solve in a similar way when $p>0$ ?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
    $endgroup$
    – Claude Leibovici
    2 hours ago

















4












$begingroup$


I am trying to work out the resolution of the cubic equation without resorting to complex numbers at all.



The general equation can in all cases be reduced to the depressed form,



$$x^3+px+q=0.$$



By a suitable scaling of the variable, this can be further reduced to



$$x^3-frac34x-frac r4=0$$ where $r>0$, or



$$4x^3-3x=r.$$



Then depending on the magnitude of $r$, we write



$$4cos^3t-3cos t=cos3t=r,$$ $$x=cosfracarccos(r)+2kpi3$$



or
$$4cosh^3t-3cosh t=cosh3t=r,$$ $$x=coshfractextarcosh(r)3.$$



This correctly handles the cases of $1$ and $3$ real roots.



Unfortunately, the trick only works for $p<0$. How can I solve in a similar way when $p>0$ ?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
    $endgroup$
    – Claude Leibovici
    2 hours ago













4












4








4


3



$begingroup$


I am trying to work out the resolution of the cubic equation without resorting to complex numbers at all.



The general equation can in all cases be reduced to the depressed form,



$$x^3+px+q=0.$$



By a suitable scaling of the variable, this can be further reduced to



$$x^3-frac34x-frac r4=0$$ where $r>0$, or



$$4x^3-3x=r.$$



Then depending on the magnitude of $r$, we write



$$4cos^3t-3cos t=cos3t=r,$$ $$x=cosfracarccos(r)+2kpi3$$



or
$$4cosh^3t-3cosh t=cosh3t=r,$$ $$x=coshfractextarcosh(r)3.$$



This correctly handles the cases of $1$ and $3$ real roots.



Unfortunately, the trick only works for $p<0$. How can I solve in a similar way when $p>0$ ?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I am trying to work out the resolution of the cubic equation without resorting to complex numbers at all.



The general equation can in all cases be reduced to the depressed form,



$$x^3+px+q=0.$$



By a suitable scaling of the variable, this can be further reduced to



$$x^3-frac34x-frac r4=0$$ where $r>0$, or



$$4x^3-3x=r.$$



Then depending on the magnitude of $r$, we write



$$4cos^3t-3cos t=cos3t=r,$$ $$x=cosfracarccos(r)+2kpi3$$



or
$$4cosh^3t-3cosh t=cosh3t=r,$$ $$x=coshfractextarcosh(r)3.$$



This correctly handles the cases of $1$ and $3$ real roots.



Unfortunately, the trick only works for $p<0$. How can I solve in a similar way when $p>0$ ?







roots real-numbers cubic-equations






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 8 hours ago









Yves DaoustYves Daoust

146k10 gold badges89 silver badges248 bronze badges




146k10 gold badges89 silver badges248 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
    $endgroup$
    – Claude Leibovici
    2 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
    $endgroup$
    – Claude Leibovici
    2 hours ago















$begingroup$
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
2 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5














$begingroup$

When $p>0$, you can apply Cardano's formula. It will give you the only real root of your cubic. And the formula will not have to deal with complex non-real numbers.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    That's right, I forgot that. In fact the real case of Cardano also deals with my $r>1$, right ? I was hoping to find symmetric formulas.
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    8 hours ago


















2














$begingroup$

Stupid me, I missed the relation



$$sinh 3t=4sinh^3t+3sinh t$$



which works without restrictions on the value of the LHS. It completely solves the case of $p>0$ as



$$sinhfractextarsinh(r)3.$$



Putting all together, one can solve all cases of the cubic by means of the following canonical "trisection" functions below, which solve



$$4y^3pm 3y=x.$$



The "hyperbolic" ones have expressions in terms of cubic roots, the trigonometric ones relate to the "casus irreductibilis".



enter image description here



Finally, it seems that it all boils down to the normalization of the equation to one of two forms, with or without an inflection, by an affine transformations of the argument, and getting rid of all coefficients.



This might look like a circular method (solving a cubic by solving a cubic), but we now have analytical expressions in terms of familiar transcendental, real functions.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$

















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );














    draft saved

    draft discarded
















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3362769%2fsolving-the-cubic-without-complex-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5














    $begingroup$

    When $p>0$, you can apply Cardano's formula. It will give you the only real root of your cubic. And the formula will not have to deal with complex non-real numbers.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$














    • $begingroup$
      That's right, I forgot that. In fact the real case of Cardano also deals with my $r>1$, right ? I was hoping to find symmetric formulas.
      $endgroup$
      – Yves Daoust
      8 hours ago















    5














    $begingroup$

    When $p>0$, you can apply Cardano's formula. It will give you the only real root of your cubic. And the formula will not have to deal with complex non-real numbers.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$














    • $begingroup$
      That's right, I forgot that. In fact the real case of Cardano also deals with my $r>1$, right ? I was hoping to find symmetric formulas.
      $endgroup$
      – Yves Daoust
      8 hours ago













    5














    5










    5







    $begingroup$

    When $p>0$, you can apply Cardano's formula. It will give you the only real root of your cubic. And the formula will not have to deal with complex non-real numbers.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    When $p>0$, you can apply Cardano's formula. It will give you the only real root of your cubic. And the formula will not have to deal with complex non-real numbers.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered 8 hours ago









    José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

    215k26 gold badges167 silver badges291 bronze badges




    215k26 gold badges167 silver badges291 bronze badges














    • $begingroup$
      That's right, I forgot that. In fact the real case of Cardano also deals with my $r>1$, right ? I was hoping to find symmetric formulas.
      $endgroup$
      – Yves Daoust
      8 hours ago
















    • $begingroup$
      That's right, I forgot that. In fact the real case of Cardano also deals with my $r>1$, right ? I was hoping to find symmetric formulas.
      $endgroup$
      – Yves Daoust
      8 hours ago















    $begingroup$
    That's right, I forgot that. In fact the real case of Cardano also deals with my $r>1$, right ? I was hoping to find symmetric formulas.
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    8 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    That's right, I forgot that. In fact the real case of Cardano also deals with my $r>1$, right ? I was hoping to find symmetric formulas.
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    8 hours ago













    2














    $begingroup$

    Stupid me, I missed the relation



    $$sinh 3t=4sinh^3t+3sinh t$$



    which works without restrictions on the value of the LHS. It completely solves the case of $p>0$ as



    $$sinhfractextarsinh(r)3.$$



    Putting all together, one can solve all cases of the cubic by means of the following canonical "trisection" functions below, which solve



    $$4y^3pm 3y=x.$$



    The "hyperbolic" ones have expressions in terms of cubic roots, the trigonometric ones relate to the "casus irreductibilis".



    enter image description here



    Finally, it seems that it all boils down to the normalization of the equation to one of two forms, with or without an inflection, by an affine transformations of the argument, and getting rid of all coefficients.



    This might look like a circular method (solving a cubic by solving a cubic), but we now have analytical expressions in terms of familiar transcendental, real functions.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



















      2














      $begingroup$

      Stupid me, I missed the relation



      $$sinh 3t=4sinh^3t+3sinh t$$



      which works without restrictions on the value of the LHS. It completely solves the case of $p>0$ as



      $$sinhfractextarsinh(r)3.$$



      Putting all together, one can solve all cases of the cubic by means of the following canonical "trisection" functions below, which solve



      $$4y^3pm 3y=x.$$



      The "hyperbolic" ones have expressions in terms of cubic roots, the trigonometric ones relate to the "casus irreductibilis".



      enter image description here



      Finally, it seems that it all boils down to the normalization of the equation to one of two forms, with or without an inflection, by an affine transformations of the argument, and getting rid of all coefficients.



      This might look like a circular method (solving a cubic by solving a cubic), but we now have analytical expressions in terms of familiar transcendental, real functions.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$

















        2














        2










        2







        $begingroup$

        Stupid me, I missed the relation



        $$sinh 3t=4sinh^3t+3sinh t$$



        which works without restrictions on the value of the LHS. It completely solves the case of $p>0$ as



        $$sinhfractextarsinh(r)3.$$



        Putting all together, one can solve all cases of the cubic by means of the following canonical "trisection" functions below, which solve



        $$4y^3pm 3y=x.$$



        The "hyperbolic" ones have expressions in terms of cubic roots, the trigonometric ones relate to the "casus irreductibilis".



        enter image description here



        Finally, it seems that it all boils down to the normalization of the equation to one of two forms, with or without an inflection, by an affine transformations of the argument, and getting rid of all coefficients.



        This might look like a circular method (solving a cubic by solving a cubic), but we now have analytical expressions in terms of familiar transcendental, real functions.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Stupid me, I missed the relation



        $$sinh 3t=4sinh^3t+3sinh t$$



        which works without restrictions on the value of the LHS. It completely solves the case of $p>0$ as



        $$sinhfractextarsinh(r)3.$$



        Putting all together, one can solve all cases of the cubic by means of the following canonical "trisection" functions below, which solve



        $$4y^3pm 3y=x.$$



        The "hyperbolic" ones have expressions in terms of cubic roots, the trigonometric ones relate to the "casus irreductibilis".



        enter image description here



        Finally, it seems that it all boils down to the normalization of the equation to one of two forms, with or without an inflection, by an affine transformations of the argument, and getting rid of all coefficients.



        This might look like a circular method (solving a cubic by solving a cubic), but we now have analytical expressions in terms of familiar transcendental, real functions.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 7 hours ago

























        answered 8 hours ago









        Yves DaoustYves Daoust

        146k10 gold badges89 silver badges248 bronze badges




        146k10 gold badges89 silver badges248 bronze badges































            draft saved

            draft discarded















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3362769%2fsolving-the-cubic-without-complex-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            199年 目錄 大件事 到箇年出世嗰人 到箇年死嗰人 節慶、風俗習慣 導覽選單